After approximately a year of talks, in teams and one-on-one, at lunches and even at the seemingly seminal conference in Annapolis, the negotiations with the Palestinians are once again sliding into a stalemate.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert did everything in his power at his meeting on Sunday with PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas to persuade him to present an agreement in principle. “We have to complete the Annapolis process,” Mr. Olmert urged Mr. Abbas.
On the issue of Jerusalem, Mr. Olmert proposed that a joint Israeli-Palestinian apparatus be established, with international backing, to find a solution for the holy places – the Temple Mount and the Mount of Olives.
Deputy Israeli Prime Minister Eli Yishai attacked Mr. Olmert sharply, prior to his meeting with Mr. Abbas, following reports of his intention to accelerate the diplomatic negotiations, including examining a solution to the problem of Jerusalem within five years, with the help of international agencies and clerics.
“The prime minister has no legal or public legitimacy to make decision on a shelf agreement or any agreement, certainly not on the topic of Jerusalem,” said Mr. Yishai, adding, “the PA (Palestinian Authority) leadership is virtual and any agreement with them will serve as a basis for terrorist violations on their part and an attempt to upgrade their situation. Above all, it is clear that no dialogue should be held, certainly not with international agencies, on Jerusalem, as if it were negotiable currency.”
Another person who tried to curb the enthusiasm demonstrated by the prime minister’s associates at the idea of reaching a quick agreement, was chief PLO negotiator Saeb Erekat. He said that the PA was not optimistic regarding the possibility of finalizing all the conditions within two or three weeks. “At the start of talks, we already made it clear to Israel that we did not intend to accept a partial agreement, which would not finalize all the issues, including, of course, the issue of Jerusalem and a resolution of the refugee problem. All the talk about an agreement within a week, two weeks or three weeks are not true and not accurate. These are rumors,” said Mr. Erekat. He noted that the talks were mainly intended for summing up the progress in the negotiations to date, and refused to confirm or deny that there had been understandings in writing.
David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com. His Web site is www.IsraelBehindTheNews.com
©The Bulletin 2008