On Wednesday, the outgoing Israel government’s Security Cabinet approved Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s proposal to link the Israeli POW Cpl. Gilad Shalit’s release to any future security arrangement with the Hamas.
Now, say government sources in Jerusalem, the ball is in Hamas’ court. “If they want to rebuild Gaza using the crossings to get goods, then let them release Shalit,” they said.
The Shalit family sounded encouraged Wednesday by the unanimous decision. “We are pleased but the road to his release is still long,” his father, Noam Shalit, said.
However, no Israeli government cabinet member objected to the idea that Israel would pay a heavy ransom in order to free its POW.
That ransom would involve Israel freeing hundreds of Arab terrorists who were convicted of murdering 1,178 men, women and children in Israel since September 2000, in hundreds of lethal attacks that included bus bombings, drive-by shootings, restaurant explosions, hit-and-run attacks and worse.
The list of victims can be viewed at: http://tinyurl.com/29478.
The Bulletin asked the Israeli government why Israel must pay ransom to Hamas with the following eight questions:
1.If Israel pays ransom to a regime which has kidnapped a citizen of the free world, would that not create a precedent that would reverberate across the globe?
2. Would freeing convicted terrorists not create an incentive for Hamas to kidnap anyone else then demand even greater ransom in the future for their freedom?
3. Why is the government of Israel feeding the world with a monolithic message, as if the only way to free the one kidnapped Israeli citizen in Gaza, Cpl. Shalit, would be to trade hundreds of lethal murderers for his freedom?
4. Why does the government of Israel not announce a total economic shutdown of Gaza until the Gaza regime hands over a kidnapped citizen of Israel?
5. Is this because economic sanctions would cause leading Israeli firms to lose profits that they now gain from exports to the Palestinian Authority?
(According to a study released in mid-January by Globes, Israel’s daily business paper, Israeli firms currently export $2.7 billion of products to the Palestinian Authority.)
6. Is the Israeli government pressured to conduct “business as usual” with the Hamas regime in Gaza by “Dor Alon,” Israel’s leading gasoline conglomerate, which owns a contract as the prime supplier of gasoline to Gaza?
7. Since the new owners of “Dor Alon” now include former Israel Finance Minister, Mr. Beiga Shochat and the former president of the World Jewish Congress, Mathew Bronfman, are either Mr. Shochat or Mr. Bronfman pressuring the government of Israel to conduct business as usual with the Hamas regime in Gaza instead of clamping down economic sanctions on the Hamas regime?
8. In sum, why does Israel not impose a total economic freeze of Gaza instead of a surrender to Gaza, to forestall the prospect of a nation flooded with highly motivated convicted murderers on the streets of Israel?
Israeli government spokespeople would not answer any of these queries.