Israel isn’t struggling in Gaza. It’s winning a rapid victory

The Israel Defence Forces have been attacking Hamas in Gaza from land, sea and air for two weeks now, following a three-week air campaign. Before ground operations began, US military advisers urged the Israelis not to launch a large-scale campaign, which they believed would result in an IDF bloodbath – and be less effective than a combination of air strikes and special forces raids. The IDF rejected that advice, and moved into Gaza with a large combined arms force. And it has confounded its critics…

Click here to read the full article. 

NYT report reveals details of Hamas headquarters under Shifa Hospital

Hamas began constructing its headquarters under Shifa Hospital, Gaza’s central hospital, from the moment the organization took control over the Gaza Strip in 2007, the New York Times reported on Monday, citing eight former and current IDF and intelligence officials. The organization first dug additional levels under the hospital’s basement, after which it connected it to its tunnel system, which runs under Gaza.

A senior Shin Bet official told the NYT that Hamas’s complex includes several floors, which contain meeting rooms, barracks, and storage. According to the report, several hundred people at least can gather in these spaces. A statement by the IDF Intelligence Directorate to the newspaper stated that Hamas terrorists divert electricity from the hospital to the headquarters and that the headquarters have several entrances, both from within the hospital and from the outside.

The Israeli officials told the New York Times that in the past, the IDF refrained from operating in the hospital to prevent civilian casualties, but it paid a price for this since what is under the hospital has remained untouched. The officials said that Israel would not repeat that mistake and the Hamas complex under Shifa would not remain, despite international pressure to spare it and additional hospitals.

The Shifa Hospital has been one of the focal points of the international debate around the conflict. Israel has proven that while on its top floors, the hospital treats patients below ground, Hamas runs a central headquarters, hiding behind the civilians in the building.

On Sunday, the IDF revealed that it coordinated with hospital staff to transfer much-needed fuel for urgent medical use and even placed 300 liters of fuel at the entrance to the hospital, but Hamas officials prevented the fuel from reaching its destination.

PA chairman at Arab summit: We own the land, Jerusalem and the holy places

Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas said on Saturday that “we own the land, Jerusalem and the holy places, and the flag of Palestine that remains raised high unites us, and the occupation will go away.”

Speaking at a summit of Arab leaders held in Saudi Arabia, Abbas called the war in Gaza “an unparalleled war of destruction at the hands of the cowardly Israeli war machine, which violated prohibitions and international and humanitarian law and crossed all the red lines in the Gaza Strip.”

“The Israeli occupation authorities and those who support and defend them bear the full responsibility for the killing and injury of every child, every woman and every Palestinian in this unjust war, and we will pursue the occupiers on the international stages, and we will do justice with them, and we will punish them in the international courts even if they go to the end of the world,” he vowed.

Abbas demanded that the US “stop the Israeli aggression and act to end the Israeli occupation of our country, our people and our holy places”, and that the Security Council “stop this brutal aggression against our people immediately and ensure the entry of medical equipment and food and supply water, electricity, fuel to the Gaza Strip and prevent deportation our Palestinian people are in Gaza, in the West Bank and in Jerusalem.”

The PA chairman added, “We will never agree to a military and security solution because they have all failed because the occupation authorities are thwarting the two-state solution and have replaced it with the deepening of the settlement, the policy of annexation and racial cleansing and discrimination in the West Bank and Jerusalem and the siege of the Gaza Strip.”

Abbas also stressed that “we will never bargain for the legitimate rights of our people” and that “the Gaza Strip is an inseparable part of the State of Palestine, and it is imperative that there be a comprehensive political solution for all the land of the State of Palestine, including the West Bank, Jerusalem and Gaza.”

In the diplomatic aspect, Abbas demanded that the Security Council grant “the State of Palestine” the status of a full member, hold an international conference for peace, provide international protection to the Palestinian Arab people and to outline a plan to implement a diplomatic solution based on international legitimacy and the Arab peace initiative.

Investigation Into COGAT and Israel Corporate Sector Complicit Operations in the PA, especially in Gaza.

Israeli corporations have a de facto monopoly on the provision of supplies to Gaza
and other PA areas. The ability of these corporations to sustain their exclusive
control of this multi-billion dollar market is wholly dependent on COGAT
(Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories) decision making.

Proposed-investigation-of-Israeli-Corporate-Corruption

Connect the dots

Connecting the dots is as easy as putting various facts and clues together in order to see the whole picture or to understand something globally.

On 9 November, Jews worldwide commemorated the anniversary of Kristallnacht when, in 1938, Jewish businesses, synagogues, communal buildings and homes were vandalised and destroyed. At the same time, Jews were assaulted and systematically brutalised, rounded up and deported to Dachau. This pogrom against Germany and Austria’s Jews signalled the inevitable doom of European Jewry. Significantly, it also demonstrated to the Nazis that they could literally get away with murder as the democracies refused to take any meaningful steps in defence of the Jewish victims.

Today, in 2023, history repeats itself as latter-day Nazis slaughter Israelis while Jews in the Diaspora face increasingly toxic hate. There is a direct line between Kristallnacht and its aftermath and the scenes we are witnessing in cities everywhere these days. A reluctance to connect the dots proves that large swathes of humanity seem incapable and unwilling to acknowledge reality even when it hits them full force in their face.

One would think after the most horrendous slaughter of Israeli civilians by Hamas it would be logical for anyone with any sort of intelligence to recognize that this group is in fact a terrorist organization. Yet, amazing as it may seem, there are millions who as a result of their own ignorance and prejudices, cannot actually arrive at this logical conclusion.

What about those countries which, despite all evidence, still cannot bring themselves to designate Hamas as terrorists?

I am not thinking of the usual suspects where democracy and human rights are fictions of the imagination. Neither am I speaking of nations where endemic hatred of Jews is so embedded that it has become a natural feature of the political landscape.

The fact that these countries are members of the United Nations and can sit in judgment and condemn Israel every Monday and Thursday is irrelevant. In fact the UN is irrelevant because by its very condoning of members who swear to eradicate the Jewish State, it demonstrates its hypocrisy. Iran has just assumed the chairmanship of the UN Human Rights Council. What further proof is needed?

It may come as a shock to realise that the one democracy and fellow member of the corrupt UN, which does not recognise all of Hamas as a terrorist group, is none other than New Zealand.

Unbelievably, and despite all logical proof to the contrary, no NZ Government has managed to do so. Yes, they have designated the “military wing” of Hamas as terrorists, but for some inexplicable reason, they maintain that the “political wing” of Hamas is somehow a champion of the oppressed and downtrodden and, therefore, have no connection to the murderers carrying out jihad.

Refusing past pleas to recognise reality, both National and Labor-led Governments persist in living in la la land.

What makes their stance so untenable is the fact that overwhelming evidence exists to prove that there is, in fact, no difference between the alleged two “wings” of this murderous group.

In an effort to help the incoming Government make a belated decision, I offer some clues which might enlighten those in Wellington still stuck in some time warp of unreality.

First and foremost, it is important to realise that Hamas is one unified group regardless of whether its followers are actively murdering Jews and Israelis or trying to bamboozle gullible millions with politically duplicitous rhetoric. This simple fact seems to have escaped the befuddled minds in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

This recent declaration by a senior Hamas “political” official is unambiguous.

As recorded by MEMRI, a senior Hamas official, Ghazi Hamad, told Lebanon TV on 24 October: “Hamas will continue to carry out massacres until the Jewish State is destroyed. Israel is a country that has no place in our land. We must remove that country because it constitutes a security, military and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nation and must be finished. We are not ashamed to say this with full force. Israel’s existence is illogical.”

This is not something new because the Hamas political charter clearly calls for the disappearance of Israel and its Jewish inhabitants. It is crystal clear that Hamas, whether political or military, is committed to genocidal and terrorist aims. They have never hidden their agenda.

It is, therefore, astounding and inexplicable, given all the available evidence, that no New Zealand Government, whether of the left or right, has ever designated all of Hamas as a banned terror group.

What further proof is needed, especially after the massacres of 7 October?

Some naively believe that now the knee-jerk anti-Israel MPs of the left and their associates are in opposition, sanity will prevail and this travesty will be rectified. Unfortunately, I do not believe that just because a more conservative coalition is in power, common sense will prevail. Far too many conveniently forget the fact that it was a previous National Government with a Jewish Prime Minister as its leader which co-sponsored the infamous UN 2334 Resolution. This travesty of a resolution denies the Jewish connection to Jerusalem, the Temple Mount and the historical heartland of Judea and Samaria. It is a permanent and slanderous indictment of international hypocrisy and a continuing disgraceful scandal.

Will the incoming NZ coalition officially apologise and openly declare that it distances itself from this past stab in the back?

Based on past and current rhetoric, I doubt it.

What is stopping New Zealand from joining Australia and most other democracies in classifying Hamas in its entirety as a terror organisation? When one of his senior colleagues equated the pogrom of 7 October with the Holocaust, the incoming PM reprimanded him for his “excessively strong” language. If speaking the truth is deserving of censure, then how likely is it that the country’s leader will actually grasp the nettle and act accordingly.

New Zealand’s new Parliament will have at least twenty-one MP’s who are openly hostile to Israel. They cannot bring themselves to condemn terror without trying to create some moral equivalence between a democracy protecting its citizens and terror groups bent on murdering Israelis and instigating violence against Jews elsewhere. The 15 Greens and 6 Maori Party members, plus assorted Labor Party cheerleaders are indicative of which way the wind is blowing in Aotearoa.

Will the incoming coalition belatedly take a firm stand against Hamas, or will it hide yet again in some sort of wishy-washy doublespeak?

When politicians wish to avoid hard decisions, they inevitably hide, trying to cover the field and appease all sides. Thus, instead of seriously dealing with Islamic jihadist demonstrations and cries of “gas the Jews” and “from the river to the sea” they instead pivot to condemning “Islamaphobia.”

Has anyone by any chance noticed mass mobs of Jews and their supporters rampaging through the streets of any city anywhere shouting death threats against Muslims? Have Muslim homes and Mosques been defaced with hate symbols and graffiti? Are Muslims warned not to wear clothes or jewellery which might identify them and target them? In other words, are Muslims being targeted in the same way that Jews are being threatened?

Avoiding tackling clear expressions of jihadist intentions by scattering red herrings needs to be called out for what it really is. Political correctness combined with political moral cowardice makes a lethal combination.

Earlier this year, the city council of New Zealand’s Capital, Wellington, decided to enter into a “sisterly” relationship with Ramallah. At the time, proponents of this move waxed eloquently about the similarities between both cities and extolled the virtues of such a marriage. I am not sure whether this relationship was ever consummated, but the very idea demonstrates how warped and clueless the idea was from the very beginning.

Last week, over ten thousand Ramallah residents roared their wholehearted approval as the leader of Hezbollah, a fraternal partner of Hamas, threatened to join in efforts to murder Israelis.

Ramallah is also the headquarters of the PA, whose leader Mahmoud Abbas, facilitates the payment of stipends to the murderers of Jews.

A sisterly relationship, therefore, between Ramallah and Wellington would be a marriage in hell. Given current circumstances, that represents an appropriate shidduch (match).

In 1948, New Zealand’s Prime Minister, Peter Fraser, declared his intention “to stand four-square for justice for the ancient home of the Jewish People and the return of Jews and creation of the Jewish State.” What a contrast with today.

In 1948, the Arab predecessors of Hamas and Hezbollah (Palestinians not yet having been invented) declared their intention to thwart and abort the rebirth of Jewish sovereignty. At the same time they rejected a country of their own because they wanted all or nothing.

In November 1938, Jews were the targets of pogroms in Germany and Austria. In London, they were threatened by the Mosley fascist black shirts.

In 2023, Jews are still being targeted. Connect the dots.

Never Again was the reaction to the Shoah; now it helps us understand why this war must continue

Dear Friends,

I was walking home today in midtown Manhattan and, to my horror, there was a brightly lit up truck declaring “NYC for the Palestinians, Israel must be stopped”.  This started me thinking – we need to start believing what various Palestinian entities are saying rather than take our usual “stop killing” attitude.  And we need to react to save ourselves and our children.  So here is the shortest email I will ever write about this war:

Hamas says they will keep Israel fighting forever; they will never relent and never stop killing Jews.

“Palestine will be free from the River to the Sea” is a declaration by Palestinians and their sympathizers of the War of Return.   The Palestinians including, I presume, Hamas will take all the land currently inhabited by Israeli Jews.  The implication is that all the Jews will be dead.  There is a song sung in second grade in UNRWA schools that declares the remnants of the war of Return will be drowned in the Sea.  Over 6.5 million Jews live in Israel.  The result of the River to the Sea plan will result in more dead Jews than those killed in the Holocaust.

These two points are all you need to know to understand why Israel must keep fighting and we, the USA, must keep supporting the Israelis.

Am Yisrael Chai

Joan Lurie

The ‘Massacre’ Coming to Judea and Samaria

The Biden administration warns against settler violence, the IDF goes soft against West Bank violence and the terror coming to Judea and Sumeria. Watch now on The Caroline Glick Show IN Focus!

 

Haaretz Forms of “indiscretion”

1. opinion stated as fact
2. only one side presented
3. incorrect fact
4. illogical conclusion drawn from facts
5. skewed choice of subjects that are presented
6. skewed choice of reports that are considered accurate
7. article gives last word to one side without its truly addressing the other side
8. no source cited or only unidentified sources are cited
9. exaggerated estimation
10. twisted moral equivalence
11. misleading headline

7.11.23
Israel News | Haaretz Today
Haaretz Today |

Netanyahu’s Far-right Ministers Are a Gift to Hamas

He brought these extremists into the center of power, and he refuses to part ways with them now, despite a commitment from opposition leader Yair Lapid to join the government if they are removed.

5. skewed choice of subjects that are presented

Anti- Netanyahu subject chosen.

3. incorrect fact

On August 2: “Ynet News reported that when Lapid was asked about the possibility of joining the government with Netanyahu, he replied, “Not while Netanyahu is there. I am the first one who would set up a coalition with Likud, but it’s impossible with Netanyahu.”

I haven’t heard of a change since this statement.

9. exaggerated estimation

“almost every day”
“mostly giving interviews these days”
“caused immense damage”

1. opinion stated as fact

“but as always, [Netanyahu] puts his own political needs and personal good above any other consideration.” (This is presented as a news article.)

Oct 11, 2023
Haaretz | Opinion

How Can Left-wingers Hail Hamas Atrocities Against Israelis as ‘Palestinian Resistance?’

“If it’s morally indefensible to kill Palestinian civilians, even when framed as a fight against terrorism, taking the lives of Israeli civilians is equally inexcusable, even when presented as a battle against occupation.”

10. twisted moral equivalence
It should say: “is even more inexcusable.” Because it is morally defensible to kill terrorists, but it is clearly not morally defensible to kill any Israeli (or anyone who happens to be in Israel) as a battle against “occupation.”

If the moral equivalence is accepted, then one can claim that:
“Since it’s morally defensible to kill Palestinian civilians, when framed as a fight against terrorism, taking the lives of Israeli civilians is equally defensible, when presented as a battle against occupation.”

2.11.23

Haaretz | Israel News
‘Criminal Record Can Be Overlooked’ |

Israel’s Army Plans to Recruit Settlers With No IDF Experience to Defend Ultra-orthodox West Bank Settlements

8. no source cited or only unidentified sources are cited
Just “dedicated website”, “a person who called the army”
The recruits do not have to be settlers and a criminal record may not disqualify in some cases, but will never simply be “overlooked”

30.10.23

Analysis |

In Its Most Difficult Hour, Israel Is Being Led by a Puppet
the prime minister blamed the massacre and the military defeat exclusively on “all the defense officials, including the head of Military Intelligence and the head of the Shin Bet [security service],”

4. illogical conclusion drawn from facts

The tweet may have been used by Netanyahu to avoid blame for the time being.

However, the quoted tweet does not explicitly “blame” anyone and it certainly does not do so “exclusively”.

It only says that Netanyahu received “evaluations” of those authorities “that Hamas is deterred…”

5. skewed choice of subjects that are presented
Anti- Netanyahu subject chosen.

30.10.23

Middle East News | Palestinians

‘Alarming and Catastrophic’: This Is What Aid to Gaza Was Like Before the War – and Now

11. misleading headline

7. article gives last word to one side without its truly addressing the other side

The headline, the beginning and the end present the Palestinian position.

In the middle, the Israeli position is fairly presented – that Hamas has stored supplies and will probably take possession of new supplies

However, the ending position simply ignores the real concern that any additional aid will be taken by Hamas – as the middle position confirms has happened in the past.

In this way, the article supports the conclusion that Israel must provide supplies that may assist Hamas in continuing its fighting.

29.10.23

Internal U.S. State Dept. Document Urges Pressure on Israel to Renew Gaza Water Supply

The recommendations carry implicit criticism of Minister Yisrael Katz’s sweeping order to halt the selling of all water, electricity and fuel to the Gaza Strip.

2. only one side presented

The recommendations carry equal implicit criticism of Hamas’ failure to provide supplies from what it has stored up.

5. skewed choice of subjects that are presented

In general, there are many articles about Arab suffering both within Israel and within Gaza. However, I saw nothing said about the suffering of Israelis apart from the attack on Simchat Torah.
No articles on the suffering of the families of the killed and the kidnapped, and certainly nothing about the suffering caused by rocket attacks – the tension, the need to take shelter, the evacuations, the traumatization, etc.

15.10.23

Israel News | National Security & Cyber

Musk’s X and Hamas’ Digital Offensive: Gaza Is a Perfect Storm of Disinformation

Pictures of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s chemical weapons slaughter of civilians, for example, were presented as if they were from the aftermath of an Israeli attack on Gaza. Such examples abound from both sides of the war.

2. only one side presented

It claims there are examples from both sides, but no example is given of Israel posting fake news regarding Hamas activity.

31.10.23

Haaretz | U.S. News

Biden Bleeding Support From Arab-Americans Over His Support for Israel, Poll Finds

Arab-American support for U.S. President Joe Biden has overwhelmingly dropped largely due to his support for Israel and its military operation in Gaza, according to a new poll commissioned by the Arab-American Institute.

4. illogical conclusion drawn from facts

It’s not clear that the poll indicates why support for Biden has dropped, especially since 40% say they would vote for Trump and only 17.4% for Biden.

1.11.23

Haaretz | Israel News

To Retain World Support, Israel Plays Up Humanitarian Aid to Gaza

The significant change over the past few days in Israel’s public stance on bringing food, water, and medical supplies into the Gaza Strip stems from an understanding that criticism of the operation will only grow.

1. opinion stated as fact

This is a news article which states as fact several assumptions regarding the intentions of Israeli publications and actions. For example, how is it known that the supposed change in public stance “stems from” a concern about criticism? Perhaps these assumptions are correct, but they should not be stated as fact.

1.11.23

Haaretz | Opinion

Israel Is Not Committing Genocide in Gaza
…instead of seeing this as positive and critical to put checks and balances on Netanyahu’s government, which indeed includes supporters of terror, genocide and full apartheid,

1. opinion stated as fact
Which members of the government supports “terror, genocide and full apartheid?”

30.10.23

Israel News | Haaretz Today

At War, Are Israelis Really Unified?

The leader of the city’s “garin torani” (a state-funded group of Jewish religious nationalists who are meant to indoctrinate their urban neighbors), called for all Arabs at the college to be expelled.

2. only one side presented
The garin torani “educates” not “indoctrinates”. The Arabs were expelled after eggs were thrown at Jewish worshippers

To date, six Palestinians have been killed by Israeli settlers since the war began.

3. incorrect fact

I know of only one purported case, not six. In another article from the previous day – “Five Palestinians Killed by Israeli Army Fire in West Bank, Palestinian Health Ministry Says” – also claims there are six but only mentions one.

It may be including soldiers as settlers.

2.11.23
Haaretz | Israel News

Israeli Defense Minister: Transfer Funds to Palestinian Authority Immediately

11. misleading headline

There is no article discussing this headline. I did searches for “transfer funds” “defense minister” and Palestinian Authority”
Did the defense minister say to transfer funds to the PA?

Haaretz Magazine

Israeli Peace Activists Who Lost Loved Ones in the Hamas Massacre Stand Their Ground

“The Palestinian people suffer a lot from the Hamas regime, but what can you do?”

4. illogical conclusion drawn from facts

Why make peace with Hamas if they cause the Palestinian people to suffer?

Cash flow: 16 years of Qatari money to Hamas has created a monster

In Israel, Qatar has been identified for years, and certainly after the murderous attack of October 7th, as belonging to the axis of evil. This follows the aid it provides to the terrorist organization Hamas, either through financing or through hosting its leaders in its territory or through the broadcasts of Al Jazeera, which has become its mouthpiece. “Qatari money” has become synonymous with the building of the terrorist empire of Hamas which has struck with all its force in Israel.
The Qatari funding for Hamas is divided into two periods. The first, in the years 2007-2014, when the Qatari government financed Hamas as it saw fit, far from any international supervision and control, and the second from 2014 until today when Qatari financing is done in coordination with Israel, the United States and the United Nations. At the same time, independent financing channels operate all the time in Qatar, ignoring the authorities.
At the same time, over the years, the Qataris realized that they were in trouble, since the image of a country that finances terrorism stuck to them. The issue is particularly sensitive due to the desire to maintain close relations with the United States, especially before hosting the World Cup a year ago. This is why the Qataris have always made sure to claim that the aid is intended for the poorest Gazan families and to extend the hours of electricity in Gaza. They also made sure to claim that this funding actually goes through and under Israel’s supervision. As evidence, they claimed that the list of those in need is transferred to Israel every month. Bottom line, the Hamas government in Gaza reaped profits from the Qatari money that flowed into the Strip on a monthly basis. This happened not only by manipulating the oversight mechanisms – such as putting Hamas members on the list of those in need – but because it controlled the economy of the Strip and collected taxes on every economic activity that took place there.
U.S. published a list of financiers
The Hamas organization does not rely only on state financial aid from Qatar and Iran, but over the years has established an international economic empire that is well disguised under false names and seemingly legitimate companies. Hamas uses all the countries in which it has a presence to operate its financing network, and in this aspect, the office of Hamas in Qatar, which opened in 2012, is no different.
Over the years, the leaders of Hamas and its operatives in Qatar have established a sophisticated financing network. In the past, it was reported that real estate investment companies belonging to Hamas are registered in Qatar under supposedly innocent names, including the names of women.
The one who is still assisting in the effort is Iran, which also has good relations with its Qatari neighbor. Last week, the authorities in the United States published a list of names of the prominent figures in the international financing network of Hamas. Among others, Muhammad Nasrallah was mentioned, a Jordanian citizen and veteran Hamas operative who settled in Doha, the capital of Qatar, and has been involved in recent years in transferring money to Hamas, including the military arm. This activist has close ties with Iran, which helps him.
Relations between Qatar and Israel relations were not always murky. Qatar was one of the two Gulf countries that opened an office of interests in Israel after the Oslo Accords. Although it was closed with the start of the second intifada in late 2000, Israel and Qatar continued to have diplomatic relations and meetings below the surface.
Money was smuggled in cash through the tunnels
In 2007, the formations were reversed when Israel and Qatar found themselves on opposite sides of the fence. This happened after Qatar was one of the only countries to publicly express support for Hamas after it carried out a violent coup against the Palestinian Authority in the Gaza Strip. In 2012, the emir of Qatar at the time and the father of today’s ruler, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, became the first head of state to visit Gaza under the rule of Hamas, when he pledged to raise $400 million to be used for the economic rehabilitation of the strip.
These were the peak days of the “Arab Spring”, when Mubarak’s rule in Egypt was overthrown and allowed the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, the parent movement of Hamas, to power in Cairo. It was then reported that Qatar transferred annual aid to Hamas estimated at $100 million. It is understood that it is difficult to provide evidence for this, since the transfers of funds, if they occurred, were done in secret to escape international supervision and possible sanctions or, alternatively, the cash was smuggled through the tunnels into the Gaza Strip.
Even before the overthrow of the Islamist President Muhammad Morsi in Egypt, in July 2013, a document was circulated in the Arab media, supposedly from the Central Bank of Qatar, in which the transfer of $250 million to the Political Bureau of Hamas was approved. It was then claimed that this amount was transferred as a special grant intended to protect Morsi’s rule through Hamas terrorists. The document’s authenticity has been questioned, but its publication reflected the atmosphere created around Qatar’s activities at the time. After the overthrow of Morsi and the return of the army to power, it was reported that Qatar transferred to Hamas a special adaptation grant worth $350 million.
Although no conclusive evidence was given for the actual transfer of funds, in 2014 the then-U.S. Undersecretary of the Treasury David Cohen stated that Qatar had been financing Hamas “for years”. This activity of Qatar also attracted the attention of the FATF organization, an international task force for the development and promotion of policies to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, which in recent years has published unflattering reports about the Gulf state.
The rationale that motivated Qatar to support Hamas is that Islamist organizations are getting stronger, and will hence play a more significant role in the future of the region. Therefore, it is important for a small country like Qatar, which feels threatened by a variety of factors, to maintain normal relations with them. This rationale was dominant at the height of the Arab Spring, when Islamists seemed to be reaping the political gains across the Middle East.
Operation Protective Edge in the summer of 2014 was a turning point in Qatari funding for the Gaza Strip. The United States, the United Nations, Qatar, and Israel decided on the establishment of a new mechanism, under which the Qatari government will assist the Gaza Strip in the amount of $30 million per month. Of this amount, $10 million will be earmarked for the purchase of fuel from Israel for the operation of the only power plant in the Gaza Strip, $10 million for financing salaries of government employees, and $10 million for a monthly aid of $100 to 100,000 needy families. This was the beginning of the construction of the concept within Israel, according to which the more Hamas accumulates economic assets, the less its appetite will be to realize its murderous ideology calling for the destruction of Israel. It is difficult to know which portion of these funds ended up in the pockets of the military wing of Hamas, whose senior officials have claimed over the years that this wing has separate financing channels.

Congressman Smith: ‘UNRWA schools are breeding grounds for hatred’

Thank you for the opportunity to submit a statement on behalf of the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC), a leading Jewish Global Human Rights NGO to this distinguished Subcommittee,

I am honored to serve as the SWC’s first Children’s Advocate. I am especially attuned to the fragility of young people, having devoted my professional career to Pediatrics.

I am sorry to report that I have witnessed first-hand the shocking indifference and lack of meaningful action by the United Nations and its numerous agencies tasked with the protection of children’s rights when it comes to Israeli and Jewish children in dire need of support.

Comm Foreign Aff 11.8.23