UNRWA’s Terrorists, by Ted Bellman

FirstOneThrough

Once again Israel is being forced to combat terrorists who have committed and plan to commit murderous attacks on civilians. Once more, the locus for the attacks is coming from United Nations’ “refugee” camps. Once again, the majority of the terrorists are Arabs whom the UN has told have rights to move into grandparents’ homes in Israel.

UNRWA Wards By The Numbers

For the year ending December 2021, according to UNRWA, there were 6,539,844 Palestinian wards who accept services from the agency, of which 5,807,653 (89%) were “refugees” and another 732,191 (11%) were other people whom the UN thought deserved particular support. Of the 6.5m, 863,708 (13.2%) are above age 60, suggesting perhaps only 2.6% of the total, or 175,000 are actual refugees from 1948 who lost homes a few miles away in Israel, after they launched a war to destroy the Jewish state.

The total number of UNRWA Refugees jumped by about 2.5% by year end 2022 to 6.7 million, while the number of actual refugees continues to decline. The total for West Bank wards was around 1.12 million (16.7%) and in Gaza it was 1.76 million (26.3%), which means that around 43% of all UNRWA wards already live in the area of 1948 Palestine, just a few miles from where ancestors had lived.

The majority of UNRWA wards live in Jordan, about 2.55 million (38% of the total wards), and have Jordanian citizenship. Jordan had been part of the original Palestine Mandate in 1922, and then attacked Israel in 1948 and illegally annexed the eastern portion of Israel which became known as the “West Bank” in 1950. After expelling all Jews from the region, Jordan granted all non-Jews in the area citizenship in 1954. Jordan abandoned its claim on the “West Bank” in 1988, and began pulling its citizenship from Arabs in the region.

The balance of UNRWA wards live in Lebanon (557,300) and Syria (674,500).

UNRWA offices in Jerusalem (photo: First One Through)<
>
<
>
UNRWA Camps in the West Bank

Roughly 25% of UNRWA’s West Bank wards live in official UNRWA “camps”. There are 19 camps currently including:

UNRWA’s Jenin Terrorists

UNRWA’s camp in Jenin has long served as the launching point for terrorists as well as a safe haven for murderers.

2002 Massacre

On March 27, 2002, roughly 250 people sat down for a festive holiday seder meal for Passover in the Park Hotel in Netanya along the Mediterranean Sea. A 25-year old member of Hamas from the nearby West Bank city of Tulkarm walked into the hotel and blew himself up, killing 30 and injuring 140. Hamas praised the attack and said Israelis “have to expect those attacks from everywhere, from every Palestinian group.” The Palestinian Authority named a soccer tournament after the terrorist the next year.

In response to the attack, part of a wave of Palestinian terrorism that killed 135 Israeli civilians in that month, Israel launched Operation Defensive Shield a few days later. From April 1-11, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) entered the Jenin Camp which was home base of many of the killers. Rather than bomb the area from the air which might have resulted in the injury of Arab civilians, the IDF deployed infantry into the narrow streets. Palestinian militants set boobytraps which killed and maimed over a dozens soldiers, so the IDF brought in armored bulldozers to clear them out. The militants surrendered on April 11 and the IDF cleared out of the area the following week, but not before losing 23 soldiers.

Center of Jenin Camp in April 2002, cleared of wanted militants, land mines and boobytraps<
>
<
>
June and July, 2023 IDF Incursions for Jenin Camp Terrorists

The Jenin Camp was long been a stronghold of the political-terrorist group Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. In September 2021, a new group called the Jenin Brigades was formed and it was soon accompanied by the Lion’s Den. The terrorists groups committed in excess of 50 attacks against Israeli civilians and soldiers, many attacks staged under the umbrella of UNRWA.

On June 19, the IDF came to arrest two UNRWA ward terrorists. As the Jenin Brigades open fire on the IDF, the Israelis responded with live fire. Eight Palestinian gunmen were killed, most of them confirmed terrorists. UNRWA confirmed that the majority were wards under its care.

As the IDF left the camp, the terrorists detonated a roadside bomb under an Israeli armored vehicle, wounding eight soldiers. Israel deployed a gunship helicopter to help rescue the soldiers from the hornet’s nest.

After yet additional terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians, Israel launched another incursion into the camp on July 3rd. The 48 hour operation once again focused on a small section of the UNRWA camp, where the IDF removed Palestinian terrorists, weapons and weapon-making factories.

UNRWA Ward Terrorists

The high percentage of UNRWA wards who are terrorists goes to the heart of the conflict: it is not about “occupation” or lack of sovereignty, as these people are in Palestine and under Palestinian rule. These terrorists have been told by the United Nations that they are entitled to move into homes where grandparents used to live inside of Israel. They are frustrated by the failure to get their “right of return” which the global body has promised.



Entrance to UNRWA refugee camp as a keyhole with a key on top, demonstrating that the pathway to homes inside Israel is via UNRWA.<
>
<
>
The United Nations has incubated a destructive cult mentality which is leading to terrorism and death. It is well past time to shut UNRWA, and the first camps to be shuttered are those under Palestinian rule, the launching pads in Gaza and the West Bank.

Related articles:

The Growth of UNRWA’s “Other” Wards

Time to Dissolve Key Principles of the “Inalienable Rights of Palestinians”

Help Refugees: Shut the UNRWA, Fund the UNHCR

Stabbing the Palestinian “Right of Return”

“Politics Aside,” It’s All Politics for UNRWA

Related music video:

The 2002 Massacres of Netanya and Jenin (music by Gorecki)

Observation: Tel Aviv police chief Amichai Eshed clueless – thought alternative was breaking bones rather than ARRESTING Kaplan dictators

 5 July 2023

“I could have easily used disproportionate force and filled the ER at
Ichilov [Medical Center] at the end of every demonstration in Tel Aviv. We
could have cleared Ayalon [Highway] within minutes at the terrible cost of
cracking heads and breaking bones, at the cost of breaking the pact between
police and the citizenry…as a commander I taught generations of policemen
to recognize the limits of force, to safeguard our contract with the public…
Unfortunately, for the first time in my three decades of service, I was met
with the bizarre reality that calm and order are not the desired goal, but
rather the opposite is.”

Tel Aviv police chief Amichai Eshed announcing his resignation

Amichai Eshed asserts that the choice was between:

Option #1: Allowing Kaplan dictators to block roads – thus violating his
“contract with the public” to assure that REST OF THE PUBLIC the freedom of
movement which is recognized as a BASIC RIGHT in Article 13 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of
movement” .

or

Option #2: Cracking heads and breaking bones

Amichai Eshed is CLUELESS.

There was ALWAYS another option:  ENFORCING THE LAW.

And by ENFORCING THE LAW I mean ARRESTING EVERYONE BLOCKING THE ROAD
regardless of the time that it takes.

Let every Kaplan dictator burn hours or even days being processed before
being released.

Let every Kaplan dictator find themselves spending a lot of time within the
court system.

And let every Kaplan dictator who did enough to spend time in jail instead
of just face a fine spend time in jail.

Let us be clear what has happened after the police allowed the Kaplan
dictators invade Terminal 3 and effectively close off Ben Gurion Airport:

The Kaplan dictators have tasted blood and they like it.

I have spoken with Kaplan dictators today to see if there are any red lines.

So I asked if they can invade a hospital emergency room with their protest.

“Why not” was the response.

I asked one if it would be ok to hold a protest in front of a fire house so
that the fire trucks can’t get out.

“Sure”.

Good Israelis have now been brainwashed by the favorable media coverage to
accept the behavior of the Kaplan dictators.

And unfortunately, a lot of people are silent.

Naftali Bennett, for example, was busy patting himself on the back on
Twitter for his BBC interview today but never found the time to write even a
sentence against the actions of the Kaplan dictators.  It doesn’t matter if
he has some poll that shows he would lose some supporters in the next
elections if he opened his mouth against road blockers and airport invaders.
The true test of leadership is when you do the right thing simply because it’s
the right thing.

Bennett’s not alone.  There are all kinds of public leaders who remain
silent.  Including of course President Herzog.

And of course – Prime Minister Netanyahu has declined to take a strong
public stand for the police to finally do their job in dealing with the
Kaplan dictators.

We cannot afford for this leadership void to continue.

Will France do what it demands of Israel?

There’s a meme making the rounds, showing a tricolored map of France in blue, white and red, only it has a jagged black line running through the middle from north to south. 

Accompanying this image is the following message, referring to Sharia-supremacist rioting across the country in recent days: “This attack only underscores the need for France to immediately engage in negotiations with French Muslims that will result in the creation of two states for two peoples, living side by side in peace and security, with Paris as a shared capital.” 

The question occurs: How long will it be before enemies of France demand such an outcome? Improbable as it may seem, the answer likely is “Not long.” That’s especially so since President Emanuel Macron and his predecessors have been the most insistent in demanding that Israel follow precisely this suicidal advice.

This is Frank Gaffney.

Heads in the sand

According to a popular and widely accepted myth, it is believed that ostriches spend a large part of their day with their head in the sand.

In actual fact this is a fallacy.

The only forms of life which, in reality, often seem to bury their head in the sand are humans.

Continuing to vote for political parties which habitually take the side of Israel bashers is a classic case. Pretending that the victim is to blame and, therefore, somehow deserves everything directed at it is another symptom. Joining the lynch gangs in the vain hope that this will deflect attention and gain approval is an old failing tactic. History should have taught us that self-flagellation and attempted assimilation never work in the long run.

This past week has provided yet more examples of what happens when reality is distorted and deliberately manipulated.

These are just a few samples that are worth noting.

Advocates of a post-Shoah secure Jewish future in Europe make much of the fact that the return of Jews to Germany and the resurrection of decimated communities there and in other countries on the continent proves we have triumphed over evil. The largest Jewish communal centre since pre-Shoah times has been opened in Berlin. This has been heralded as a wonderful renaissance of Jewish life in a country where 90,000 Jews are affiliated with a communal organisation and 100,000 are unaffiliated. In the same breath, as communal leaders celebrate the dedication of the US$43.7 million edifice and wax lyrically about Jews returning to the fatherland, one can discern some discordant signs.

Efforts to ban Shechitah and Brit Milah in Europe continue and the increasing popularity of political parties with dubious past histories as far as Jews are concerned all point to trouble ahead.

The German antisemitism Commissioner has declared “that German schools must teach that Jews belong in our country”. Based on the recent past one can assume that this will be a wasted exercise in shutting the stable doors after the racist horses have bolted.

In a report to the Austrian Parliament, it was revealed that, based on data collected, one-third of Austrians think Jews are trying to take advantage of the Nazi era while forty-seven percent think that Jews have too much power in the country. More than one third of Austrians think Jews dominate the international business world.

Meanwhile, it is reported from the Netherlands that one in ten Dutch teachers encounter students who deny that the Shoah ever occurred.

One of the best examples of “head in the sand” syndrome is the statement by the President of the EU Union of Jewish students on whether Jews in Europe have any future. She remarked that “she is confident that European Jews will continue and become stronger than ever. As much as antisemitism is a threat, it is also part of the European Jewish identity for better or worse. It makes Jewish communities resilient and active.”

I have yet to discover anything more detached from the grim realities of rising Judeophobia. It is the same hallucinatory conclusions that communal leaders, lay and religious, spouted pre 1939. A report released earlier this year stated “antisemitism has been rising in Germany since the country’s reunification in the 1990s. In the modern day, antisemitism takes many forms, including hate speech, violent attacks, and anti-Jewish conspiracy theories.”

It may not be politically correct to say so but the stark reality is that there is no future for identifying Jews anywhere in Europe, west or east. Increasing restrictions on religious life and rising hate combined with rampant assimilation will inevitably decimate even those who may think they are welcome citizens.

Meanwhile, “down under” another variation of the “head in sand” affliction has manifested itself.

The City Council of Wellington, New Zealand’s Capital, with the support of its Mayor, moved to enter into a “sisterly” relationship with Ramallah. A further proposal to recognize “Palestine” and light up the town hall with its national colours on Nakba Day was for the time being at least put on hold. The Mayor declared her intention to host a meeting with the “Palestinian” Ambassador to Australia in order presumably to express solidarity and support.  This decision by Greens and leftist progressives earned the enthusiastic support of a local group which described Wellington and Ramallah as being “remarkably similar.”

True to form, someone identifying as an “alternative Jewish voice” welcomed the advent of Ramallah to Wellington. This is a classic case of the intended victim embracing her eventual fate.

As a Jewish Israeli, if I was ever to set foot in Ramallah, I would be lynched by the “peace-loving” gangs there. However, for woke progressives, facts like that are seemingly irrelevant.

The official slogan by of the Wellington City Council is “LET’S GET WELLINGTON MOVING” which reads more like an advertisement for laxatives. According to news reports, with potholes galore, failing water infrastructure and burst water pipes, gang violence and robberies commonplace, transport chaos, one would think that those elected to run the city might have more important challenges. Instead of obsessing about things which show their ignorance and cluelessness, they should be busy fixing all the major problems in their own backyard.

Meanwhile, back on ground zero here in Israel, the sight of Jews settling in their historical homeland causes international anguish and sleepless nights.

President Herzog has rung PA President for life, Abbas, and asked him to do something to prevent further terror attacks against Israeli civilians.

While this request may possibly gain a few brownie points from the White House, the State Department, the EU and the UN Secretary General its general effect will be zero. The media no doubt has already ignored or buried this news item.

I have lost count of the number of times that Israeli as well as Diaspora Jewish spokespersons have trodden this same failed path.

How on earth can any intelligent person believe that an individual who stands up in front of the UN General Assembly and spouts slanderous lies about Israel will actually do anything to rein in the terror gangs now running the PA and associated groups?  If you read the incitement pouring forth on a daily basis from Ramallah and Gaza you will immediately understand why appealing to the likes of Abbas and his partners in crime is a futile and self-defeating exercise. It merely reinforces in the warped minds of those concerned that Israel is desperate and weak.

The facilitators of terror and delegitimizers of Jewish sovereignty only understand one language and it certainly is not pleading telephone calls asking them to suddenly transform into paragons of tolerance.

If all those who currently are unable to see reality were to actually open their eyes and unblock their ears progress towards genuine peace might be made.

Unless and until that occurs it is imperative to expose the lies, double standards and hypocrisy as well as settling in greater numbers in our Promised Land.

Michael Kuttner is a Jewish New Zealander who for many years was actively involved with various communal organisations connected to Judaism and Israel. He now lives in Israel and is J-Wire’s correspondent in the region.

Netanyahu: Preserving A State Of Terror

Recent reports in the Jewish Chronicle have shed light on a disheartening development within Israeli politics.

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, during a briefing at the Israel Knesset Parliament Foreign Affairs and Security Committee, declared that the Palestinian Authority (PA), operating under the umbrella of the PLO, a designated terrorist organization, “must be preserved.” This statement raises serious concerns, considering the PA’s role in promoting terrorism, denouncing Israel’s legitimacy, and its complicity in armed attacks against Jewish civilians.

It is alarming to note that the PA school system has become a breeding ground for terrorism, perpetuating a cycle of violence. Furthermore, the PA consistently denounces the legitimacy of a Jewish state in various international forums, exhibiting a refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist. The PA’s actions, including its involvement in armed attacks against Israeli citizens, are indicative of a state of war rather than a commitment to peace.

Even more concerning is the active participation of the Palestine Security Forces (PSF), trained by Israel to assist the IDF, in hundreds of armed attacks against Jewish individuals traveling on highways. The confirmation by senior Israel Cabinet Minister Avi Dichter, who formerly headed the Shabak General Security Services, underscores the gravity of the situation. It is disheartening to see the mainstream entity of the PA, Fatah, reporting directly to PA leader Machmud Abbas, involved in such acts of violence.

The most distressing aspect is the PA’s daily praise of murder attacks in real-time, glorifying the senseless loss of innocent lives. This includes the recent petrol station attack on four unarmed Jews in June. Yet, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s statement suggesting the preservation of the PA raises concerns that Israel may tolerate a permanent state of war within its own borders, given the PLO’s endorsement of violence against Jews on both sides of the pre-1967 armistice lines.

As a veteran journalist, I sought to test the reality of the situation. I asked Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office if they had demanded the repeal of the PA’s law that provides a lifetime salary for anyone who murders a Jew or for the family of someone killed while attempting to murder a Jew. While his spokesman claimed that such demands had been made, I requested documentation to support this assertion.

Unfortunately, despite extending the deadline for submission of this article, there was no response from the Prime Minister’s spokesman. The failure to provide documentation raises serious doubts about the government’s efforts to address the PA’s incentivized violence, where individuals are rewarded for acts of terror.

It is essential that Israel takes a firm stand against the PA’s incitement and incentivization of violence. Repealing the law that rewards murderers and their families must be a priority. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s silence on this matter is deeply troubling, as it sends a message that such actions may go unchallenged. The international community must also hold the PA accountable for its incitement, ensuring that steps are taken to promote peace and discourage violence.

Peace cannot be achieved while one side perpetuates a culture of total war and rewards acts of terror. It is imperative that Israel, as well as the international community, condemn the PA’s incitement and demand the repeal of laws that incentivize violence. Only by taking a strong stance against the PA’s dangerous actions can we hope to pave the way for genuine peace and security in the region.

Prime Minister Netanyahu must recognize the urgency of addressing the PA’s incitement and incentivized violence. It is imperative for the Israeli government to unequivocally demand the repeal of the law that rewards murderers and their families. Failure to do so not only perpetuate a cycle of violence but also undermines the prospects for a meaningful and lasting peace process.

The international community must also play a role in holding the Palestinian Authority accountable for its actions. It is crucial for world leaders and organizations to condemn the incitement and incentivization of violence, urging the PA to take concrete steps towards promoting peace, dialogue, and reconciliation.

It is deeply concerning that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s failure to address the PA’s dangerous actions raises doubts about Israel’s commitment to combatting terrorism and fostering peace. The incitement and incentivized violence perpetuated by the Palestinian Authority must not be overlooked or tolerated. It is essential for Israel, supported by the international community, to take decisive action in demanding the repeal of the PA’s laws that promote and reward acts of terror. Only through a united front against violence and incitement can we hope to create a future where Israelis and Palestinians can live in peace, security, and mutual respect.

Canada has committed more money to Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA, amid concerns about oversight

Canada has committed more money—up to $100 million over four years—to the United Nations agency responsible for the welfare of Palestinian refugees.

The announcement of new funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) came June 26 in a statement from Harjit Sajjan, minister of international development.

The latest allocation is meant to deliver “core programs that support basic education, health, social services and livelihood opportunities and protect the rights of Palestinian refugees,” the statement from Sajjan’s office said.

Canada, it added, is also providing $3 million to UNRWA’s Emergency Appeal for the West Bank and Gaza “to ensure the delivery of humanitarian assistance for basic services,” such as emergency food aid, health services and improved water and sanitation access.

The latest round of funds responds “to the rising needs and deteriorating conditions” faced by Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Gaza, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan.

The new money is in addition to the $90 million Canada committed to UNRWA from 2019 until now.

The agency has been a magnet for controversy over the years because of its alleged ties to terrorist groups, use of hateful teaching materials in UNRWA-run schools, and reports of corruption in the agency’s administration.

Under former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Canada’s contribution to UNRWA dropped to $19 million by 2009, but only to the emergency appeal for food and jobs, and nothing to the general fund, over concerns about the agency’s ties to Hamas.

That year, a study by the Center for Near East Policy Research in Israel found that Hamas, which Canada considers a terrorist group, was elected to run the UNRWA Workers Union and UNRWA teachers association.

The Trudeau Liberals reinstated full funding to UNRWA in 2016.

The following year, Canada and UNRWA signed a joint “Framework for Cooperation” outlining Ottawa’s expectations regarding UNRWA’s reform initiatives, regular monitoring and reporting, compliance with Canadian anti-terrorism requirements, and other oversight measures.

The document called on UNRWA to address “inappropriate” use of social media by its staff and to review curricula in schools the agency runs to ensure they are in line with “UN values and principles, including those that relate to neutrality.”

Sajjan pledged that Canada will “continue to exercise enhanced due diligence for all humanitarian and development assistance funding for Palestinians. This work includes ongoing oversight, regular site visits, a systematic screening process, and strong anti-terrorism provisions in funding agreements.”

In 2021, Canada said it would not suspend funding to UNRWA, pending an investigation into how anti-Israel, pro-violence teaching materials found their way into Palestinian schools.

That stemmed from a report by an Israeli non-profit group which found that teaching materials distributed by UNRWA to Palestinian children in Gaza and the West Bank between November 2020 and January 2021 contained incitement to violence; demonization of Israel, which was erased from maps; endorsements of jihad and martyrdom; the promulgation of “libels and conspiracies;” and failure to promote peacemaking.

Classroom materials referred to Israel solely as “the Enemy” or “the Israeli Occupation,” the Israeli study had found.

UNRWA said it pulled the offending material, saying it had been distributed in error.

Palestinian refugees face high rates of poverty, food insecurity and unemployment, Sajjan noted in his statement. In Syria, for example, 91 percent of Palestinian refugee households live in “absolute poverty.” In Lebanon, more than 89 percent of Palestinian refugees displaced from Syria are “in critical need of sustained humanitarian assistance,” the minister said.

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CJIA) said it supports “legitimate Canadian government efforts to assist Palestinians in providing measures such as food security and healthcare.”

However, CIJA remains concerned about “continued incidents of incitement by UNRWA staff, their ongoing support of terrorism, and their development and use of problematic educational materials,” David Cooper, CIJA’s vice-president of government relations, told The CJN.

“For these reasons, we agree with Canada’s enhanced due diligence and other oversight mechanisms to ensure aid is provided to the most vulnerable populations and is neither misappropriated by terror groups nor used to fund hatred,” Cooper added.

In a statement, the Toronto-based Abraham Global Peace Initiative (AGPI) expressed “profound disappointment” over the funding announcement. In light of recent terror attacks against Israelis, the group said it had called for a moratorium on any further funding to the Palestinian Authority and Gaza through UNRWA “until such time as the infamous pay-for-slay program run by the Palestinian Authority is cancelled. The program incentivizes Palestinians to carry out terror attacks against Israelis.”

Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East, which supports the boycott movement against Israel, said it welcomes the renewal of Canada’s funding to Palestinian refugees but is disappointed that the latest pledge represents an annual cut of $5 million.

House foreign appropriations subcommittee calls to cut U.S. funding to United Nations

Responding to concerns over anti-Israel and antisemitic bias at the United Nations, the House subcommittee responsible for providing funding for the State Department and foreign programs is pushing to eliminate U.S. funding for the United Nations’ general budget in its 2024 budget proposal.

The House Appropriations Committee’s State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs subcommittee advanced a draft funding bill on Friday that would make significant changes to the U.S.’ posture toward the United Nations, as well as implement a host of other policy reforms governing U.S. funding to the U.N., Iran, and more.

“Israel is routinely attacked and undermined across the entire U.N. system, while the world’s worst human rights abusers remain, frankly, relatively untouched,” Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), who chairs the subcommittee, said during Friday’s markup. “Therefore, it should come as no surprise that no funds are included in this bill for the U.N. regular budget. The ineffectiveness and the egregious failures of the United Nations and U.N. bodies do not merit support.”

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), the subcommittee ranking member, described the bill, which came in nearly 25% below the president’s budget request, as “extremely disturbing.” She intimated that the bill would be dead-on-arrival in the Senate. Lee is running for a Senate seat in California.

This bill “views the world in a black-and-white, good-and-evil paradigm. If we don’t like everything about an organization, or can’t control their actions, this bill prohibits funding,” Lee continued. “Believe me, that’s not the approach the government of [China] is taking… This is a deeply political bill that seeks to satisfy some very extreme members of Congress among us, without consideration of the real-life consequences.”

The legislation would also ban the U.S. from providing funding to the U.N. Commission of Inquiry investigating Israel or to UNESCO, which the administration is attempting to rejoin.

It includes a new prerequisite that, before each release of funding to the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, the secretary of state must certify to Congress that UNRWA is complying with a range of oversight and accountability measures, including that it is implementing policies to prevent the dissemination of content that promotes antisemitism, violence or anti-Israel sentiments in UNRWA materials. The bill would also add “a new prohibition on funds for assessed expenses for UNRWA,” according to a summary released by the subcommittee.

The House legislation would tighten restrictions on the U.S.’ support for the U.N. Human Rights Council, demanding that the secretary of state provide a “detailed reform agenda, including a timeline” for removing Israel as a permanent agenda and reforming the selection process for the panel, as well as certify that remaining on the council is in the U.S.’ “national security interest.”

More broadly, the bill instructs the administration to seek written agreements with any international organization receiving funding from the U.S. to ensure access to the organization’s financial and investigative records for U.S. inspectors general.

The House draft legislation would mandate that any nuclear agreement with Iran be submitted to Congress as a treaty. It also maintains a provision present in the 2023 appropriations bill barring the administration from revoking the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ designation as a terrorist organization. It further bans funding to any Iranian proxy organizations operating in Iraq.

The bill includes a rider mandating that the Office of Palestinian Affairs report to the U.S. ambassador to Israel and prohibiting the office from administering or managing any U.S. bilateral assistance funding. The new policy appears to come in response to objections from Republicans to moves by the Biden administration to upgrade the office’s status and allow it to report directly to the State Department.

In anticipation of an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the bill would expand existing restrictions on U.S. relations with the Palestine Liberation Organization, aiming to disincentivize the Palestinans from acting on the court’s opinion.

It would prevent the president from waiving restrictions on the U.S.’ relationship with the PLO if the Palestinians initiate “any further action, whether directly or indirectly, based on an Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice that undermines direct negotiations to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, including matters related to final status and Israel’s longstanding security rights and responsibilities.”

Another provision in the bill would eliminate any special envoys or representatives at the State Department that are not specifically authorized by law or confirmed by Congress, including the special representative for Palestinian Affairs.

The bill also requires a new report to Congress on the Palestinian Authority’s work to counter violent incitement and promote peace with Israel.

The legislation would provide the scheduled $3.3 billion in foreign military financing for Israel as guaranteed under the Memorandum of Understanding, as well as $425 million in military aid and $845.1 million in nonmilitary aid for Jordan and $2.05 billion in military aid for Egypt.

The draft bill would eliminate human rights-based conditions on military aid to Egypt imposed in recent years. It would also extend the Defense Department’s authority to maintain a weapons stockpile in Israel through 2026.

And it strips out language added in the past two years by House Democrats requiring the secretary of state to consult with recipients of foreign military aid on U.S. law regarding the use of U.S. arms. Some critics of Israeli policy saw this language as a tool to enforce stricter oversight of U.S. aid to Israel.

Followers of media coverage of the Middle East were treated with horrific misinformation when at least ten news agencies claimed that “Textbook incitement continues but U.S. support of UNRWA remains high”

Followers of media coverage of the Middle East were treated with horrific misinformation when at least ten news agencies claimed that “Textbook incitement continues but U.S. support of UNRWA remains high”. All of these misinformation sources falsely claimed that the US just allocated $223 million to UNRWA. No news agency reported the real scoop, which is that UNRWA cannot access new US funds for UNRWA until and unless UNRWA squelches incitement to violence from its curriculum, in accordance with the US – UNRWA accord from July 2021 which forbids US aid to UNRWA, so long as UNRWA incitement to violence continues in its curriculum.

Document at UNRWA site admits UNRWA’s definition of “refugee” is not valid in international law

The UN Human Rights Council issued a document last week by its reliably anti-Isrsel team of “experts” demanding that Palestinian “refugees” have the right to “return” under international law.

Right of return of Palestinian refugees must be prioritised over political considerations: UN experts 
2022 marked the largest ever increase in the number of forcibly displaced persons worldwide, with over 108 million people across the globe uprooted from their homes, more than half are women and girls….
This reality is all too familiar for the Palestinian people, 75 years since the Nakba – the event that shattered Palestinian lives and severed their ancestral connection to their land during the establishment of the State of Israel. Since then, they have endured forced displacement, dispossession, and disenfranchisement, with their rights to self-determination, restitution, and compensation repeatedly denied. For 75 years, their cry for justice, embodied in the demand for the right to return, has resounded with unwavering determination.
For Palestinians, forced displacement has become part of their life for generations, tracing back to 1947-1949 when over 750,000 Palestinians were forced to flee massacres and mass expulsions and forcible transfers during the birth of the State of Israel. The majority, along with their descendants, are still in neighbouring Jordan, Lebanon and Syria, while 40 per cent of them remain under occupation in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since 1967. Progressively, Palestinian exile has scattered them across various nations globally.

 

 Since 1948, both the General Assembly and the Security Council have consistently called upon Israel to facilitate the return of Palestinian refugees and provide reparations. Despite these repeated appeals, Palestinian refugees have been systematically denied of their right to return and forced to live in exile under precarious and vulnerable conditions outside the borders of Palestine.

 

The thing is, even the UN admits that these Palestinian Arabs are not legally considered refugees.
The UNHCR’s Refugee Survey Quarterly in 2010 has an article by Riccardo Bocco, a professor at the University of Geneva, looking at the history of UNRWA. It is hosted at the UNRWA website, today.  ASnd it admits what we have been writing here for years: the UNRWA working definition of “Palestine refugee” has nothing to do with international law.
In looking at who is a Palestinian refugee, there is no definitive response. The definition and the number of Palestinian refugees can differ according to the approach (administrative, juridical, political) used to define Palestinian refugees and also according to the social context of interaction between Palestinians (registered refugees or not) and others and the actors defining them. UNRWA, particularly at the beginning of its mandate, lacked a fixed definition; this changed mainly due to a need to delimit the number of relief recipients. When the Agency began its activities, it inherited a legacy of inflated registration: the United Nations Economic Survey Mission recorded approximately 720,000 people, while the number of recipients on the ration rolls of the United Nations Relief for Palestine Refugees (UNRPR) surpassed 950,000. It is the 1952 definition that has become the accepted one and has remained virtually unchanged: “a Palestine refugee shall mean any person whose normal place of residence was Palestine during the period June 1, 1946 to May 15, 1948, and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict”.
Some remarks should be noted…. [T]he descendants of original registered refugees inherited UNRWA’s administrative title independently of the fact that they may have obtained a nationality and/or left the Agency’s fields of operation.
It is important to emphasize that the UNRWA definition of a Palestine refugee is an administrative one and does not translate directly into recognition by international law. Furthermore, a tacit understanding seems to prevail: UNRWA’s continued existence (and the associated Palestine refugee status) is directly linked to the realization of a permanent resolution to the Palestine refugee issue.
Four crucial facts are listed here:
1. Over 30% of the original “refugee” population UNRWA registered were not refugees, and took that status illicitly. They have never been purged.

2. The UNRWA definition of “refugee” is administrative, not legal, and has nothing to do with the legal definition of refugee under international law and the Refugee Convention.

3. UNRWA “refugees” and their descendants are still considered “registered refugees” even if they move away from UNRWA areas, even if they obtain citizenship elsewhere – not only Jordan but also EU countries and the US. This is a truly absurd situation that is impossible for any real refugee; it is axiomatic that one cannot be a refugee while simultaneously being a citizen of a state. But  millions of Palestinians are.  So we have an absurd situation where American multi-millionaire supermodels (whose father’s family voluntarily walked away from their home in Safed in 1948) are still considered “Palestine refugees.”
4. UNRWA has a conflict of interest between staying in business and a sane definition of “refugee.” . This is a major reason why it does not have any cessation clauses as UNHCR does. “Palestine refugees” are forever.
All of these facts are damning,. And they are on UNRWA’s own website, today.

Getting the message

The definition of “getting the message” is to understand something that is not being said directly.

Before and after the Shoah, Judeophobia reverted to a discreet mode at least in democratic countries. It took the form of subtle discrimination often disguised as social ostracism in country clubs, golf establishments, universities and some professional groups. It also manifested itself in a coded language where certain phrases and words conveyed more than a hint of aversion to Jews.

After the shock of the Shoah gradually wore off and with the re-establishment of Jewish sovereignty, the reticence in expressing anti-Jewish views gradually dissipated.

That is where we find ourselves today, where full-blown rhetoric and slanderous lies about Jews and Israel are now standard fare.

Paradoxically the problem facing us is that whereas once we had to decipher coded messages, many feel unable or more likely unwilling to understand the raw incitement now being hurled in our direction.

If one does not understand the implications of what is being said, it follows that one will be completely taken by surprise when negative things happen. Far too many still “didn’t get it” even when in the past, the consequences have been dire.

Over the last several weeks, we have read the Torah portions relating the episodes of the spies sent by Moshe to report on the Promised Land and the abortive attempt by Korach and his followers to depose Moshe and Aaron as leaders.

In most probably the first case of anti-Zionism and self-loathing breast-beating, ten of the spies who were sent to scout out the Promised Land came back with such devastatingly negative reports that caused many of the Israelites to recoil at the prospect of making aliyah. Only Joshua and Caleb had anything good to say but they were unable to stem the panic engendered.

The punishment for this gross display of lack of faith was forty years of wandering in the wilderness until the current generation of ex-slaves died out, and a new generation was prepared to fight for and settle the land of Israel.

The attempt by Korach and his fellow malcontents to depose Moshe and Aaron also ended in disaster for them.

You would think that these two calamities might have conveyed the clear message to the multitude that certain actions have consequences, yet, despite everything, they still relapsed periodically into idolatry and behaviour not exactly in accordance with the laws received at Mount Sinai.

Over the last two thousand years in particular, the Jewish People have, from time to time, failed to learn the lessons that when others declare their intention to exclude, banish and target them they should heed the warning signals.

When almost daily rhetoric clearly indicates which way the wind is blowing there are unfortunately too many unwilling to get the hint. Whether it is political correctness, naivety, self-flagellation or just a desire to ignore reality, the message just does not seem to resonate.

A brief summary of current pronouncements should illustrate the problem.

The recent Victoria State gathering of the Labour Party was predictably an occasion for all the Israel bashers to show their true colours. Recognising “Palestine” has long been the objective of the far left. Ignoring the daily incitement to murder and eliminate any vestige of Jewish sovereignty and pretending that Abbas and the PA are paragons of democracy are standard features of these resolutions.

The Queensland Labour Party supports doubling aid to UNRWA, presumably without insisting on accountability as to how its funds are being used. It also insists that the Federal Government shifts its UN General Assembly votes back to a more neutral position. We should all recognise ill winds when they start blowing.

How long will it take before the Federal Labour Party is stampeded into embracing the terror gangs now in charge in Ramallah and Gaza? The message couldn’t be clearer. Will Jewish voters get the message or, instead, follow their American counterparts and continue to support a party drifting slowly but surely into the anti-Zionist camp?

Meanwhile, rumours continue to swirl about an impending deal between Iran and the USA. Despite denials from Washington, there is enough evidence pointing to some sort of sell-out being cooked up, which will appease the Mullahs and facilitate Iran’s march towards eradicating the “Zionist entity.”  An indication of which way the foul wind is blowing can be garnered by the comment made by an unnamed Western official to the Reuters news Agency.

“The key objective of the impending nuclear deal between the US and Iran is to stop Israel from attacking Iran.”

In plain undiplomatic language, it really means that rather than thwarting and preventing the Iranians from carrying out their aim to destroy Israel and scuttling their sponsorship of terror, the Biden Administration is preparing to follow the Neville Chamberlain script.

The only difference, of course, is that Israel in 2023 is not Czechoslovakia of 1938. That message should be clear.

Despite protestations of the USA having “our back” and other such rhetoric designed to lull Israelis into a euphoric state of optimism, the sad reality is that slowly, but surely, the Democratic Party is being dragged to the left fringes.

Secretary of State Blinken has just made a pilgrimage to China, where he stated that the US does not support Taiwan’s independence. That message should be received loud and clear in Jerusalem. If Taiwan’s alleged closest ally can shamefully stab them in the back while visiting a country pledged to its elimination as an independent nation, then the same scenario can be enacted with Israel or South Korea.

The US is very “troubled” by the prospect of Jews building homes in places like Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. While the State Department calls Iran a major state sponsor of terror it seems that Washington is not so troubled when it comes to actually doing something to scuttle Teheran’s nefarious ambitions.

The PA President for life, Abbas, has just paid a visit to China where he was embraced as a bosom buddy and comrade in arms. The Chinese President stated, “China has always supported the just cause of the Palestinians to restore their legitimate national rights.”

Legitimate national rights championed by the President of a country pledged to take over Taiwan and which had previously destroyed Tibetan independence. Birds of a feather do indeed flock together.

Diplomatic silence in the face of such hypocrisy is no excuse. We should be making a fuss but so far there has been only silence. Is anyone getting the message?

Someone who did get a message, albeit belatedly, is the soon-to-be departed American Ambassador to Israel, Tom Nides. A Democratic political appointee, he faithfully articulated the politically correct line during his tenure whereby any Jewish presence in certain parts of Israel is “verboten”. When Arab terrorists murdered yet more Jews this week, he expressed profound sorrow at the loss of life on all sides. In other words, killing Jewish civilians and killing their murderers and facilitators was equally deplorable. After an uproar, he issued another tweet in which he attempted to backtrack. Of course, by then, the damage had been done and for all except the hopelessly gullible, the message was perfectly clear.

One hopes that whoever succeeds Nides will be more attuned to the realities of the situation, but given the prevailing agenda in the White House, that is a forlorn expectation.

The United Jewish Israel Appeal in the UK has issued a directive that any groups visiting Israel under its auspices who wish to visit places over the “green line” must first receive special permission from them to do so. In other words, a visit to the Kotel, Mount of Olives, Rachel’s Tomb and Cave of the Patriarchs, among other places, cannot be contemplated without first getting the OK from an organisation which is purportedly Zionist.

What’s next? Perhaps a ban on visiting Jerusalem because the UK Government does not recognise the city as Israel’s Capital.

Are we getting these messages and what do we intend to do about them?