Avslöjande kartor: Den palestinska visionen som lärs ut i UNRWA:s skolor

 

Den aktuella efterforskningen handlar om cirka 115 kartor som förekommer i den senaste upplagan av skolböcker utgivna av den palestinska myndigheten 2020 och som används i UNRWA:s skolor. Dess källmaterial omfattade 125 böcker av årskurs 1-10 i ämnena arabiska, engelska, samhällskunskap (inklusive geografi och historia), islamisk utbildning, matematik, vetenskap och teknik.

 

Studierna syftar till att kontrollera hur detta presenteras – Israel/Palestina –, med tanke på den pågående konflikten mellan de två nationer som säger sig vara dess ägare. Grund hypotesen för denna forskning var att de två partierna ser detta land i sin helhet som sitt hemland, vilket bör uttryckas i de kartor som finns i deras respektive skolböcker. För att underbygga denna hypotes undersöktes också två israeliska läroböcker i geografi. De var officiellt licensierade av det israeliska utbildningsministeriet och utfärdades av Israeli Centre of Educational Technology (CET), som anses vara en central utgivare av skolböcker i Israel.

De israeliska läroböckerna finns kartor som presenterar landet som en enhet utan inre gränser under namnet “Israel” när dessa kartor inte var av politisk karaktär. Följande exempel är en karta med titeln “Mark i Israel”, som även inkluderar territorierna Judéen, Samarien och Gaza (liksom Golanhöjderna som ställdes under israelisk juridisk jurisdiktion 1981).

Karta nr 1 (Israel – Man and Space, Intermediate and High School grades (CET, 2007) s. 187)

Ett parallellt fenomen finns också på de palestinska kartorna. Följande är en karta med titeln “Physical Map of Palestine”:

Karta nr 2 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 1 (2020) s. 17)

 

Andra kartor på Israel uttrycker det faktum att territorierna Judéen och Samarien inte har annekterats av Israel (förutom östra Jerusalem) och Gazaremsan har blivit ett territorium utan någon som helst israelisk närvaro där sedan 2005. Dessa är mestadels kartor som bär en administrativ karaktär eftersom de utesluter dessa områden från Israels territorium med hjälp av uttrycket “[en region utan] data”. Följande är en karta med titeln “Befolkningstäthet i Israel enligt underdistrikt”:

Karta nr 3 (Utforska ett land – geografi för årskurs 6 [i] statliga och statliga religiösa [skolor] (CET, 2015) s. 69

 

Bland de palestinska kartorna som används i UNRWA:s skolor finns det å andra sidan bara ett fåtal kartor som visar konturerna av dessa områden. I följande exempel säger kartan inte specifikt vad som finns bortom dem:

Karta nr 4 (National and Life Education, årskurs 2, del 1 (2019) s. 62)

En annan karta behandlar den israeliska Negev-regionen som en del av Palestina bortom konturerna av Judéen, Samaria och Gaza:

 

“1. De fysiska egenskaperna i Palestina varierar – slätter, berg, dalar och öknar. Ytan av Negevöknen uppskattas till ungefär hälften av Palestinas yta. Det är möjligt att presentera det med bråkdelen…”

Karta nr 5 (Matematik, årskurs 3, del 1 (2020) s. 82)

En tredje karta med titeln “Palestina efter kriget 1948” säger specifikt i sin legend vad som är området bortom dessa områden:

“[Orange] arabiska territorier [lila] territorier som tagits över av sionisterna efter kriget”

Karta nr 6 (Geography and Modern and Contemporary History of Palestine, årsk 10, del 2 (2020) s. 8)

 

Och tillbaka till de israeliska kartorna. Den nuvarande politiska verkligheten beskrivs där som den är, med den palestinska myndighetens territorier betecknade som område A, och ibland även dess B-territorier, visas tydligt. Det bör dock noteras att PA inte är ett suveränt politiskt organ – även om det har erkänts av FN som en icke-medlem observatörsstat. Enligt Osloöverenskommelserna, genom vilka PA bildades och som fortfarande är i kraft, är det ett självständigt administrativt organ under den israeliska försvarsstyrkans överhöghet, som i sin tur lyder under den israeliska regeringens jurisdiktion. Följande är två israeliska kartor. Den första visar områdena A (färgad mörkbrun), och den andra visar områdena A (mörkbrun) och B (ljusbrun):

Karta nr 7 (Israel – Människan och rymden, mellan- och gymnasiebetyg (CET, 2007) s. 9)

Karta nr 8 (Utforska ett land – geografi för årskurs 6 [i] statliga och statliga religiösa [skolor] (CET, 2015) s. 10)

I total kontrast till dessa israeliska kartor (liksom många andra i böcker som undersökts till denna forskning), finns det inte ens en karta i hela korpusen av kartor som används i UNRWA:s skolor idag som visar staten Israel. Även på tydligt politiska kartor visas hela landet endast under namnet “Palestina”. Således raderas Israel, en erkänd suverän stat som har varit medlem i FN-organisationen sedan 1949, från kartorna som används av UNRWA, ett officiellt FN-organ!

Den första kartan bland de i följande exempel, med titeln “Karta över Palestina och Levanten”, presenterar de fyra staterna i Levantregionen under namnen: Syrien, Libanon, Jordanien och Palestina:

Karta nr 9 (Geography and Modern and Contemporary History of Palestine, årskurs 10, del 1 (2020) s. 8)

Det andra exemplet är hämtat från en engelsk lärobok. Kartan, utan titel, visar regionens delstater med deras namn utan ytterligare detaljer. Även här ersätter Palestina Israel:

Karta nr 10 (engelska för Palestina, årskurs 6, del 1 (2019) s. 55)

 

En annan karta, med titeln “Map of Palestine”, ger namnen på grannstaterna:

Karta nr 11 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 6, del 1 (2020) s. 9)

 

Den uteslutande palestinska karaktären av landet som helhet betonas i följande exempel. En karta med titeln “Map of the Arab Homeland” visar arabstaterna med deras namn. Namnet “Palestina” visas bredvid landet i sin helhet (färgat i rött) med den palestinska flaggan ovanför:

Karta nr 12 (Nationell och social fostran, årskurs 4, del 1 (2020) s. 8)

 

Denna karta visas i läroboken inom ramen för lektion 2 med titeln: “Palestina är arabiskt och muslimskt”:

 

Det exklusiva palestinska ägandet av landet betonas i en övning där eleven uppmanas att färglägga landets karta med färgerna på den palestinska flaggan:

“Den andra lektionen: Jag ritar mitt land

Förberedande aktivitet: Mitt lands form

Jag kommer att färga mitt hemlands karta med färgerna på den palestinska flaggan.”

Karta nr 13 (National and Life Education, årskurs 2, del 1 (2019) s. 8)

Och ett annat exempel. Inskriptionen bredvid den säger: “Tillsammans ska vi skydda hemlandet”:

Karta nr 14 (islamisk utbildning, årskurs 2, del 1 (2020) s. 42)

Palestinas exklusiva utseende på landets karta syns också i en produkt som säljs till turister som visar landets karta färgad med den palestinska flaggans färger, tillsammans med namnet “Palestina” på arabiska och engelska. Följande är ett exempel som ges i en annan lärobok:

Karta nr 15 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 2 (2020) s. 57)

Om Israels territorium före 1967 är ett ockuperat område, som anges på karta nr 6, bör det befrias. Kampen för detta mål antyds i följande illustration som presenterar kartan över hela landet mot bakgrund av Al-Aqsa-moskén och ett beslöjat ansikte av vad som kan betraktas som en medlem av en terroristorganisation, under titeln “Palestina är nationens hjärta”:

Karta nr 16 (arabiska språket, årskurs 7, del 1 (2020) s. 13)

I detta sammanhang anses städer inom Israels territorium före 1967 där araber bor, eller brukade bo, vara palestinska städer – även om majoriteten av befolkningen där är judar:

“6. Jag kommer att ange följande palestinska städer på en tyst karta över Palestina:

Acre, Haifa, Gaza, Jeriko, Jerusalem, Nablus, Safed, Beer Sheba, Hebron, Rafah.” Det bör noteras att de fetstilta namnen är städer i Israel före 1967 (inklusive västra Jerusalem) och deras befolkning är till största delen judar.

Karta nr 17 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 2 (2020) s. 39)

Nästa exempel, med titeln “Palestinska städer”:

“Aktivitet 3: Vi kommer att titta på kartan nedan och kommer sedan att utföra följande [krav]:

Vi kommer att ge exempel på palestinska städer:

-På kusten

-I inlandets bergen

-Städer i Jordandalen

-Städer belägna i ökenregionen”

 

På kartan, med titeln “Map of Palestine” visas följande städer: Acre, Safed, Haifa, Tiberias, Nasaret, Jaffa, Beer Sheba – alla är israeliska städer före 1967, samt Nablus, Ramallah, Jerusalem (varav den västra del var israelisk före 1967), Betlehem, Hebron, Gaza och Rafah.

Karta nr 18 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 2 (2020) s. 36)

Förutom att ignorera existensen av Israel som en suverän stat, efter att ha presenterat hela sitt territorium som ockuperat – med den underförstådda föreställningen att det borde befrias, finns det totalt icke-erkännande i kartorna som används i UNRWA-skolan för judarna som bor i detta landet och som idag omfattar cirka sju miljoner människor. Detta icke-erkännande uttrycks av den totala frånvaron från kartan över städer som skapats av judar i modern tid, främst Tel Aviv. Budskapet är tydligt: ​​judar är främmande för Palestina och de har ingen legitim plats där. Följande är ett exempel av många:

Städerna som visas på kartan – Safed, Tiberias, Nasaret, Acre, Beisan (dagens Beit She’an), Umm al-Fahm (förklarar officiellt som en stad under israeliskt styre), Jenin, Tubas , Tulkarm, Nablus, Qalqilyah, Jaffa, Lydda, Ramleh, Ramallah, Jeriko, Jerusalem, Betlehem, Hebron, Gaza, Beer Sheba. De saknade städerna: Tel Aviv, Holon, Bat Yam, Ramat Gan, Beney Berak, Petah Tikvah, Herzliya, Netanya, Hadera, Afula, Övre Nasaret (nyligen omdöpt till Nof Hagalil), Kiryat Shmona, Kiryat Gat, Beit Shemesh, Dimona, Ofakim , Shderot, Netivot, Karmiel, The Krayot nära Haifa och många andra.

Karta nr 19 (National and Life Education, årskurs 2, del 2 (2019) s. 58)

 

Och ett annat exempel: städerna vars namn anges på kartan – Akko, Safed, Haifa, Nasaret, Nablus, Ramallah, Jaffa, Asqakan (dagens Ashkelon), Jeriko, Jerusalem, Betlehem, Hebron, Beer Sheba, Gaza, Rafah

Karta nr 20 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 1 (2020) s. 55)

Se även kartorna nr 6, 11, 18 och det finns många fler.

 

Två undantag är städer etablerade av judar som förekommer på kartan under de arabiska namnen på de ödsliga platser där de senare byggdes: Eilat (Umm al-Rashrash) – flera gånger (se kartorna nr 11, 18 ovan) och Hadera (Al) -Khudaira) – en gång (Matematik, årskurs 4, del 1 (2020) s. 86).

Israeliska kartor däremot visar vanligtvis centrala städer som Nablus, Hebron och Gaza i områdena Judéen, Samaria och Gazaremsan (och se kartorna nr 1, 3, 7, 8 ovan).

Att dölja den judiska närvaron i landet i skolböcker som används av UNRWA kommer också till uttryck i det historiska sammanhanget. Följande är en text som åtföljer kartan över detta land och dess omgivningar i en engelsk lärobok. Texten, med titeln “Om Palestina”, avstår från att nämna landets judiska förflutna:

Karta nr 21 (engelska för Palestina, årskurs 10, del 2 (2017) s. 4)

Sammanfattningsvis ger en enkel jämförelse mellan kartorna i UNRWA:s skolböcker och deras israeliska motsvarigheter oss en slutsats:

De israeliska kartorna speglar den existerande verkligheten, medan de palestinska kartorna som används av UNRWA uttrycker den palestinska visionen där inte Israel existerar, hela landet är under palestinsk suveränitet, de sju miljoner judar som bor i Israel ”försvinner” – med sina städer och sin gamla historia där, och sättet att förverkliga denna vision är genom kamp. Den kampen nämns uttryckligen i texter som granskats i tidigare forskningsstudier och antyds även här (se karta nr 16 ovan).

 

Det finns inget sätt att rättfärdiga användningen av dessa kartor av ett FN-organ som har åtagit sig principerna att respektera suveräniteten för varje medlemsstat i FN-organisationen – inklusive staten Israel, total neutralitet gentemot parterna till konflikten och lösningen av den konflikten fredligt enligt FN:s resolutioner. UNRWA:s användning av dessa kartor visar på en grov bristande respekt för dessa tre principer och givarstaterna bör agera kraftfullt för att ändra denna dystra situation.

Citizens of Israel who live abroad plan protests against Israel during the weekend of February 4 in the cities listed below.

Citizens of Israel who live abroad plan protests against Israel during the weekend of February 4 in the cities listed below.

GIVE THEM  FEEDBACK

Glaring inconsistencies

Another week witnesses yet more mind-boggling contortions by so-called friends and declared foes alike.

Michael Kuttner

Surely by now, we should not be shocked or startled by the outbursts of duplicitous double standards and hyperventilated hysterical fear-mongering issuing forth from all and sundry. Unfortunately, experience should have taught us that there is no limit when it comes to anything to do with Israel and Jews.

Is there really any point in continuing to shine a spotlight on these manifestations of irrationality? Perhaps one should just ignore them in the hope that common sense will prevail.

Our history regrettably demonstrates that doing so is a lethal mistake.

As the forthcoming commemoration of International Holocaust Day proves, remembering murdered Jews has become, for many nations, an annual occasion to spout politically correct rhetoric while glossing over a complete failure to save Jews or prevent their demise. How many politicians have apologised for their past Governments’ failures to rescue the victims pre-war? Who will condemn the prejudices which caused borders to be shut? Who will call out the callous UK mandatory policy of barring Jewish refugees from entering Palestine because the Arabs of the time demanded it?

It’s all very well to wax eloquently about the Shoah and its devastating effects, but when the sins of the past are by direct and indirect inference transmitted onto the nation State of the Jews today, then red lines are crossed. In the warped minds of those who view Israel as the embodiment of evil and a pariah among the nations, the glaring inconsistencies couldn’t be clearer.

Crocodile tears shed at the 27 January ceremonies are so much more hypocritical when rampant Judeophobia in the Arab and Islamic world as well as UN-sanctioned incitement, are ignored.

Supporting or abstaining on UN resolutions detaching Jews from their ancient homeland and holy sites makes a mockery of Shoah commemorative gatherings.

It gets worse than that.

Today there is a move to dilute the Shoah’s core meaning by minimising the fact that the main aim of the Germans and their willing helpers was to eradicate every single Jewish man, woman and child. True, others were also targeted for elimination, but it was only the Jews who were to be systematically isolated and slaughtered. A Welsh politician has issued invitations to a Holocaust Day vigil that omits any reference to Jews.

With Jew/Israel hate once again becoming endemic, the conundrum is, what can be done to combat it? Education of a woefully ignorant generation today would seem to be a worthy objective. Some countries commendably, including the United Arab Emirates, have instituted Holocaust studies as compulsory features of their history curricula. It is shameful that still, far too many so-called enlightened democracies have yet to do so. Bear this in mind when you hear your politicians spouting forth.

Trying to educate those already infected by the virus, worthy as it is, and reaching others about to be influenced by millennia-incubated hate will merely be a drop in the ocean. In a recent survey in the Netherlands, nearly a quarter of young adults responded that the Shoah is a myth. If this is the level of knowledge in a country that was under German occupation, just imagine the ignorance level among the same age group in nations unaffected.

Contributing to the upsurge in hate is the incitement pouring out of the mouths of those who deny Jews the right to pray and freely visit the holiest site of Judaism. This stream of invective and lies is given official sanction by the cowardly utterances of diplomats and officials from various nations. The UK Minister for the Middle East, Lord Ahmed, stated on a recent visit that “the Temple Mount should remain under Jordanian control.”  Similar sentiments from others completely ignore the shameful past and present records of the Jordanians when it comes to religious freedom for Jews. That is par for the course in the twisted reality of today’s international diplomacy.

What are we to make of these inconsistencies?

The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards have been exposed multiple times as the enforcers of internal repression and external facilitators of terror. The European Parliament declared them by an overwhelming majority to be a terrorist group and, therefore, worthy candidates for international sanctions. This move has been denounced by the Iranian regime, which in turn threatens to classify European armies as terror organisations.

In response to this blatant chutzpah, the European Union Foreign Policy Chief, in full-blown appeasement mode, declined to follow through on the EU’s Parliamentary vote. Citing mumbo jumbo legal objections once again, the response to Iranian bully threats harks back to the good old appeasement days of the 1930s.

However, surprise, surprise, when it comes to condemning Israel, there is no hesitation. All it takes is for the Israeli Government to punish the terror tactics of the PA, and the wrath of Europe descends in an instant.

Palestine Media Watch reported that the PA President for life, Abbas, in a telephone call to terrorist murders of Israelis said: “you are a role model of the nation and this people and you are symbols of the Palestinian people.”

What has been the EU reaction?

The PA Prime Minister has been invited to be the guest of the EU. No doubt the red carpet will be dusted off and rolled out, and after the usual litany of PA lies is reeled off, the EU will stress that there is no better peace partner. Meanwhile, the rest of the UN democracies are mute or else they are convulsing over Israel’s new coalition.

The hysterical reaction to Israel’s new democratically elected coalition continues unabated. Although few policies have yet been enacted, the doomsday reactions pour forth. When so-called elites of the left prophesy that “darkness has descended” and that “the sky is falling” the media hyperventilate. It does not take much for international groups to join in, and that is why we can witness a festival of fevered agitation. Measured opposition and cogent, calm discourse is a natural part of democratic societies. What we are witnessing these days is an irrational campaign of vilification.

Indicative of the insanity which has now infected all and sundry is the statement of a US Jewish Congressman. In what one can only describe as gross interference in the choice of the Israeli electorate, he proclaimed, “the makeup of the Israeli Government is corrosive to support in the Democratic caucus.” In other words, unless Israelis elect a coalition which is acceptable to the Democratic Party, it will lose the support of the USA.

Faced with these glaring inconsistencies, I can only quote the reported words of Michael Medved, a US author and political commentator. He speaks about Americans but his remarks can also be applied to others suffering from the same symptoms.

“A quick glance at the American left reveals a movement in the midst of a nervous breakdown, displaying behaviour that goes beyond inconsistency into the realm of bipolar moods and multiple personality disorder.”

 Looking at the collective insanity happening all around us, it would seem that psychologists have a major pandemic to deal with.   

Michael Kuttner is a Jewish New Zealander who for many years was actively involved with various communal organisations connected to Judaism and Israel. He now lives in Israel and is J-Wire’s correspondent in the region.

Holding the EU up to its own standards

As the head of the Nahum Bedein Center for Near East Policy Research, I have covered the Palestinian Authority school system since the very first day that the PA began to issue its own textbooks on August 1, 2000. 


Having met with and received authorization of Yassir Arafat to receive and review all textbooks  issued by the Palestinian Authority and used by UNRWA schools in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and Gaza, the center engaged Dr. Arnon Groiss to review more than 1,000 school books issued by the PA. 

Dr. Groiss, fluent in Arabic, holds  a Phd in Islamic Studies from Princeton University, and a masters degree in public administration at Harvard, and served as the deputy director of Arab language services at the Israel Broadcasting Authority.

Holding the EU up to its own standards

The Story Behind The Passion for Israel Court Reform

In June 1992, with the defeat of the Likud government and the ascension of the Labor Party, the Palestine Liberation Organization, an outlawed terrorist organization in a full state of total war against Israel raised its profile and initiated illegal contacts with the Israel Labor Party.

I worked at the time as the Jerusalem Correspondent for CNN Radio, with access to high-level contacts with the Israel and US government. Therefore, I was in a position to confirm that the Bush Administration, and subsequently the new Clinton Administration, laid out policy directives mandating that Israel must follow up on these PLO contacts, described by the US government as a PLO peace initiative.

In August 1993, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres was summoned to Washington to coordinate a shift in Israeli policy, which now officially recognized the PLO as a partner for peace, despite continuing PLO terror attacks. That policy engendered the Oslo process and an accord which was signed on the White House lawn September 13, 1993, yet never ratified by the PLO.

Sources in the Israeli security establishment and the Likud opposition in the Knesset raised objections to the new US pressure on Israel to recognize the PLO as a peace partner. However, it was exactly at this time that Aharon Barak became chief justice of the Supreme Court of Israel.

In 1992, Justice Barak established a precedent to throw out all legal objections to what would become the Oslo peace process.

The Barak court did not object to the September 13 accords, despite the fact that these accords were never ratified by the PLO, and despite the fact that the PLO never renounced its public incitement to violence nor cancelled its charter to destroy Israel.

The Barak court did not object to the September 15 policy statement by the Israeli government that the IDF would supply guns to the armed forces of the PLO. Those Israeli-armed PLO forces are now in an open war against Israel.

The Barak court did not object to the decision of the Israel government to free hordes of convicted PLO felons who had been convicted of murder or attempted murder. Over the past 30 years, families of victims murdered by these felons had appealed to the high court to file motions against freeing them, citing the government’s failure to apply any system of recidivism verification, to determine whether these felons were likely to repeat their capital crimes. All this was to no avail.

A retired commander of Israel’s Security Services in Jerusalem has confirmed that Israel has freed at least 9,000 first-degree felons without any regard to the possibility of them repeating their crimes.

Get thej.ca a Pro Israel Voice by Email. Never miss a top story that effects you, your family & your community

REMOVING CIVIL LIBERTIES, PROPERTY RIGHTS FROM JEWS OF ANY AREA ACQUIRED BY ISRAEL IN THE 1967 WAR 

A central feature of US Middle East Policy in 1992 which was adopted by the Israeli government and echoed by Israel’s courts concerned a policy of delegitimizing civil liberties and property rights of Jews who live in Judea, Samaria, Gush Katif and even Jerusalem.

​For thirty years, the Israeli High Court has tossed out successive cases where Jews in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem sued for their civil liberties and property rights.

The most egregious decisions of the Barak court concerned the plight of Jews expelled from their homesin Gush Katif and Samaria in 2005. The harsh reality was that the Israeli government was not prepared to provide for 1,700 families evicted from their homes in the twenty-one Jewish communities of Gush Katif. On the eve of the Katif expulsions, at an August 23, 2005 press conference, Attorney Yitzhak Meron provided sobering evidence of the failures of the Sharon government in this regard.

Dr. Meron was a senior member of the Israel Legal Forum, an organization of 50 Israeli lawyers that worked pro bono during the period leading up to the expulsion in an effort to ameliorate the difficulties of the Gush Katif residents, presenting their case to the Knesset and the courts.

The government approach to the settlers, according to Dr. Meron, was “aggressive” from the very beginning, with a lack of direct communication.

The prime minister never went to “look in their eyes,” and ministers in the government who voted for expulsion did so without having visited the communities whose fates they were deciding. When the Defense Minister finally traveled to Katif to meet with residents there on April 19, 2005, he refused to answer questions. I witnessed that refusal.

Three days before the expulsion was to begin, the government announced that 1,000 rooms had been rented and everyone would have somewhere to stay. The reality was that 2,500 rooms were required due to large families. Officials had to scour Israel, seeking rooms at the last moment. The Forum assisted in this emergency action. People left their homes literally not knowing where they were going to go. No social workers were sent by the government to help people cope logistically, or psychologists to help with trauma.

Because the government ordered thousands of people removed from their homes, it was obligated to provide satisfactory alternative housing. However, that took ten to fifteen years, without any objection from the courts.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Aharon Barak rejected the final appeal before the Katif expulsions, giving an order for bulldozers to begin demolition. (Photo: Marc Israel Sellem/POOL via JNS).

I was present when Supreme Court Chief Justice Aharon Barak rejected the final appeal before the Katif expulsions. Dr. Meron, speaking upon behalf of the Katif community, appealed to Justice Barak to consider the justice of their case.

These “settlers” were resigned to the expulsion and only asked at the end for a relocation process to be implemented.

Barak turned to the government attorney and asked whether the government had a plan to resettle the twenty-one Katif communities. When the attorney responded vaguely that the government would take care of everything, Justice Barak smiled, thanked him, and gave an order for bulldozers to begin demolition.

When the US announced its policy to demand the removal of Jews from Judea, Samaria and the Old City of Jerusalem, a delegation of US citizens who live in these communities approached the US Consul in Jerusalem, Mr. Philip Wilcox, about the human rights of Jews in these communities. Wilcox responded with a single sentence that echoed around the world: “If you live there, you have no human rights”.

There was silence in the room. Wilcox then asked participants if they would like coffee or tea.

The legacy of Philip Wilcox lives on in the Foundation for Middle East Peace, which finances 40 organizations that support the PLO and advocate for the continuing expulsions of Jews from their homes.

Thus, the Israeli High Court of Justice paved the way for the Palestine Liberation Organization to gain land and power in the heartland of Israel.

Yet the PLO openly refuses to endorse a two-state solution. In the words of retired Member of Knesset Benny Begin, “The PLO wants a two-stage solution, not a two-state solution.”

Thanks to the Israeli High Court of Justice, the PLO is getting away with it.

Israel braces for more violence after mass-casualty West Bank raid

Israel is bracing for another escalation of violence after at least nine Palestinians were killed in a counterterrorism raid on the West Bank city of Jenin, a defense establishment source told Ynet on Thursday.
כניסת כוחות צה"ל לג'נין“This stays in Jenin for the time being,” the source said, adding that Israeli forces will be placed on high alert across the West Bank. 

“This is a number of casualties that you don’t see every day, we’re preparing for various escalation scenarios.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said in response to a Ynet request for comment that the premier is “receiving regular updates on the unfolding security events and will carry out a security situation assessment soon.”
Meanwhile, Hamas and Islamic Jihad announced that they would hold an emergency meeting in the Gaza Strip following the fighting in Jenin.

According to Al Jazeera, Islamic Jihad informed international mediators that “if the aggression against Jenin does not stop, the situation is expected to escalate and all options are on the table.”
In the meantime, no outstanding instructions have been relayed to authorities or security personnel in southern Israeli communities near Gaza.

כניסת כוחות צה"ל לג'נין
According to the IDF, the operation was launched to “apprehend a terror squad belonging to the Islamic Jihad terror organization”, acting on intelligence provided by the Shin Bet security agency. The army said it “thwarted a major attack.”

Eight of the Palestinian casualties were reportedly armed militants, most of whom were Islamic Jihad operatives. The Palestinians reported that an elderly woman was also killed in the fierce shootout between Palestinian terrorists and Israeli troops.
The IDF said it “was aware of reports of a Palestinian civilian being hit” and that “the circumstances of the event are under review.”
At least 20 others were wounded in the fighting, at least four of them sustaining serious injuries.
During the raid on a home in Jenin where the terrorists were hiding, Israeli troops employed a so-called “pressure cooker” tactic on the building and fired a missile at it.
מפגינים בעזה נגד האירועים בג'נין
Protests in Gaza against Israeli counterterrorism operation in Jenin

Such an extensive operation in broad daylight is unusual and suggests the attack was due shortly.
The raid began with IDF soldiers entering Jenin to arrest three wanted Islamic Jihad operatives, who had already carried out shooting attacks against Israeli forces.

During the arrest attempt, the terrorists opened fire on the fighters, who recognized them as armed, returned fire and killed them. Two of them tried to escape and were shot and another surrendered himself to the security forces.
IDF combat engineering soldiers entered the building in order to detonate two explosive devices used by the suspects, where there was an additional armed suspect who was killed by the soldiers at the scene.
Following the events, general strikes were announced in Jenin, Nablus and Ramallah and classes were suspended in some places.

אבו מאזן
A spokesperson for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said, “Israel is committing a massacre in the Jenin camp while the world remains silent.”
The Palestinian foreign ministry appealed to the United States and the international community: “If you don’t act now in the face of the brutal carnage in the Jenin camp, when will you?”

Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh also called on the international community to get involved.

“We call on the United Nations and all international human rights organizations to urgently intervene to provide protection to our people and stop the bloodshed that children, young people and women are experiencing,” he said.

Two of the men were identified by the Palestinian health ministry as Essam Mahmoud Azriqi (24), and Salahat ‘Iz a-Din, who is considered one of the most prominent militants in Jenin.

Piece sited by Andrew Tucker in Israel on Trial

The purpose of this report is to present a clear solid historical and legal
basis for Israeli sovereignty over the entire area of the Mandate. An objective
evaluation of the relevant binding instruments and applicable rules of
international law conclusively establishes the legality of Israeli sovereignty over
Judea and Samaria,1 and the right of Jewish settlement therein. These basic legal
historical documents speak the truth to all who choose to read them.

The British Mandate-Defining-Jewish-Sovereignty-under-International-Law2-thinc-website (1)

‘Pro-Palestinian’ Means No Such Thing

“There are three kinds of lies,” Mark Twain said, attributing the insight to Benjamin Disraeli, “lies, damned lies and statistics.” Turns out there is a fourth: “pro-Palestinian.”

Virtually everything described as pro-Palestinian is not. That is, it does not pertain to improving Palestinian Arabs’ lives in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza Strip, let alone in United Nations-maintained Palestinian internment centers—euphemistically labeled refugee camps—in those territories and Jordan, Lebanon and Syria.

Click here to read full article 

The PA poses a strategic threat to Israel’s security

Recent steps taken by the new Israeli government in retaliation for the Palestinian Authority’s appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) represent the first indication that a much-needed change is underway.

Traditionally, Israeli governments avoided confronting the PA over its breaches of the Oslo Accords, such as supporting terrorism, ongoing incitement, and unilateral activities in international fora.

Click here to read full article 

Frantic Frenzy

The Oxford dictionary definition of frenzy states “a period of uncontrolled excitement or wild behaviour.”

Michael Kuttner

Here in Israel, we seem to be experiencing an endless period of such manifestations. It is not only on the local scene but also erupting internationally.

The basic cause can be traced back to the results of the 1 November 2022 general elections, which resulted in a fairly decisive defeat for the self-proclaimed champions of democratic values and liberalism.

Interestingly, although the defeated coalition consisted of at least one post-Zionist party espousing extreme left-wing views, nobody, either in the media or international forums, used the words ultra-left or extremist. Likewise, the Arab party in the coalition was never called out by commentators or the media for more or less managing to hide its ambivalent attitude towards Islamic terror. The so-called centre parties did a wonderful balancing act of trying to appease those spreading lies and fables about Israel and kowtowing to the United Nations’ endless condemnations. Rhetoric was never in short supply, but when it came to actually making the offenders pay for their actions, there was a distinct lack of a sustained counterattack.

It is vital to remember this because if one is to believe the overblown headlines and frenzied comments of all and sundry since the election results were announced, one would think that a coup d’état has taken place. That is precisely the expression being bandied about by those about to see many of their sacred cows sacrificed.

Obviously, in the distorted thinking of those who proclaim themselves “enlightened, liberal and democratic,” all voters and parties to the right of centre must, by their definition, be fascistic, ultra and extremist.

In addition, anyone who refuses to subscribe to the latest woke political thought beliefs must be a bigot and beyond redemption. Add to the mix an increasing number of voters who believe that we are here because of our religious and historical heritage, and you have the perfect answer as to why the current frenzy has become a veritable apocalyptic storm.

When the leaders of the righteous left give vent to their frustrations by whipping up the masses with bombastic outbursts, it is only natural that their followers will likewise erupt with full fury. In a democracy, opposition voices can and indeed must be heard, but when they descend to rabble-rousing, red lines are crossed. Threats of civil warfare and other inflammatory threats are apparently acceptable if they emanate from the “enlightened left” but are threats to democratic values if they are uttered by the “ultras” of the right.

When a former Prime Minister and millionaire leader of the socialist workers’ Labour party can spout drivel such as “this Government is legal but clearly illegitimate” and “street battles must oust the Prime Minister”, you know that irrational lunacy has supplanted common sense. The deafening silence of much of the media and the “liberal defenders of democracy” in the face of this incitement highlight the glaring double standards now prevailing.

At demonstrations, the black flags of anarchy and the terror flags of the Palestinian Authority can be seen, which just about sums up where many of these protesters are coming from.

JNS reported that the New Israel Fund had admitted financing anti-Government protests in Israel, which should not come as any surprise given their past funding of various extreme leftist groups. No doubt, various other European NGOs are also involved in helping to stir the pot against Israel’s democratic Government.

It is no wonder, therefore, that given all this domestic frenzy, international organisations and nations genetically opposed to Israel’s continued presence in the region have jumped on the bandwagon.

After all, if post-Zionist media outlets in Zion that print and post daily diatribes against the country’s Jewish ethos and excuse each and every outrage perpetrated by terror facilitators can blacken the country, then why can’t the UN and others do the same? I am not sure in these days of woke correctness whether one can still use the expression “blacken”, but no doubt you get the drift.

It was reported by the Times of Israel that the Principal of Israel’s most prestigious secular high school had some time ago stopped pupils from going on State-sponsored visits to Auschwitz. His reason for doing so was because “these trips contribute to the process of fascisization taking over politics in Israel.” To put it simply, his opposition is really a result of pupils returning from Poland with a heightened sense of Israeli and Jewish national consciousness and identity. Seeing first-hand what Germans and their willing partners did to defenceless Jews in the Diaspora has the effect of strengthening Israeli youth in their determination to not allow the same fate to befall their families. This, in turn, can result in some questioning the policy of submission to those who incite and carry out terror acts in Israel.

In the eyes of those who promote extreme leftist policies of appeasement and belittle the religious and historical connection of Jews to this Land the strengthening of any national pride is fascist. Past Israeli Ministers of far-left parties espoused the same sort of opposition to these visits to Auschwitz.

Coincidentally in the international media, taking their lead no doubt from our own flagellating groups, various commentators and so-called experts warn about the rising tide of “aggressive nationalism”, which is posing a peril. In today’s politically correct climate, this means that Zionism which is the movement of Jewish nationalism is by direct inference a threat to world peace. Israelis who demonstrate their patriotism either by voting for nationalist parties or merely by expressing their belief in the necessity for a strong State are therefore condemned. This explains why Israel as the resurrected national nation of the Jewish People, is the target of universal disdain.

At the end of December, the UN General Assembly voted at the behest of the PA to refer Israel to the International Court of Justice at The Hague. Safe in the knowledge that any condemnation of Israel can garner an automatic majority, this latest diplomatic terror tactic is a safe bet as far as Abbas is concerned.

When the previous coalition was in power, the worst that could be expected would have been worthless expressions of outrage followed by Abbas visiting Defence Minister Gantz at his home, where following a cup of tea, all would be back to normal again. After all, as stated by leading members of the past Government, Abbas is our only hope as a peace partner.

This time, however, much to the consternation of the PA and its fellow travellers, the newly installed right-wing coalition reacted in a totally different manner.

Instead of a verbal slap on the wrist and then business as usual, the consequences are far more serious.

Instead of transferring tax money to the PA so that they can continue to pay terrorists for slaying Israelis, the relevant amount has been withheld and redirected to victims of Palestinian terror. Finally, and long overdue, there is a financial penalty for the PA’s ongoing campaign of physical and diplomatic terror.

The next step has been the cancellation of VIP passes for PA officials, which enable them to enter Israel automatically without having to stand in line like everyone else.

Also belatedly, but better late than never, is the clamp down on illegal building in Area C of Judea and Samaria. Financed and facilitated by the EU, this illegal construction has been ignored for far too long.

As anticipated, these measures have unleashed a frenzy of agitated horror from all and sundry. The prospect of an Israeli Government actually taking steps to defend its sovereignty and punishing those waging war against it is anathema. That is why from so-called friends and well-known foes alike, the condemnations have been pouring forth. Apparently, over 90 countries have supported a demand by the PA to force Israel to rescind these sanctions.

Commendably Australia is not among these appeasers. Unsurprisingly, New Zealand, after having abstained on the original UN resolution to refer Israel to the ICJ, has added its name to those countries demanding Israel immediately cancel its penalties. No doubt having been criticised for abstaining in the first place, the NZ Foreign Ministry felt it had to condemn Israel, and thus it jumped on the bandwagon.

An example of how deranged some frustrated leftists have become is the case of a Tel Aviv owner of a restaurant that has kosher certification. In protest at her favourite left-wing party having lost the election, she has now decided to cancel the kosher status of her establishment and presumably now serve up “glat treif” instead.

In the face of this domestic and international insanity, it is time to stand strong and act accordingly.