New brooms

Monday, 20 January 2025, promises to be the start of a major political cleaning operation in Washington.

For the majority of Americans who voted for Trump and the overwhelming number of Israelis who hoped he would triumph, inauguration day heralds a beginning full of promise.

For the majority of Jews who voted for Harris and a Democratic Party veering ever closer to woke leftist policies, inauguration day spells doom and gloom.

A friend of mine who has just returned from visiting family in the USA recounted that the thought of Trump becoming President is a nightmare for many he met and spoke with during his visit. He recounted how one person ripped up the cover of TIME magazine, which featured Trump as “man of the year.” This outbreak of TDS, otherwise known as Trump Derangement Syndrome, seems to be a prevalent feature of those who cannot and will not reconcile themselves to the reality of the election results.

Of course, total detachment from reality reaches the very top. Joe Biden has maintained that he could have beaten Donald Trump. He even asserted that Kamala Harris could also have done so. It is very sad when such unhinged nonsense is reported and even excused by certain sections of the media which still live in denial.

The same sort of “make-believe” was evidenced in a media interview that the outgoing American Ambassador in Israel gave recently. As a Democrat appointee he naturally praised the Biden Administration for its support of Israel during the last four years. President Biden represents a dying breed of old-time Democrats who still have some sympathy for the Zionist enterprise. Unfortunately, his track record is rather uneven.

If Israel would have listened to all his “don’ts” Sinwar would still be alive, Hamas would still be smuggling weapons over the border from Egypt, the perpetrators of the 7 October pogrom would still be at large, Nasrallah would be still hiding in his bunker and Hezbollah would be menacing northern Israel. As it is, the Houthis are continuing their piracy and missile and drone attacks. Iran is unafraid of Biden, Harris and Blinken, whose weak responses have merely emboldened them. Biden cancelled the Houthis designation as terrorists so why should they fear him? He also unfroze billions of dollars enabling Iran to continue financing terror.

Naval vessels and anti-missile batteries, notwithstanding the hold-up and slowdown in the supply of critical munitions, sent a message to adversaries. Hamas and friends became emboldened after seeing US pressure on Israel to cease, withdraw and release terrorists. They realized that all they had to do was galvanize international pressure via the UN, ICJ and the ICC and wait for Israel to wilt. Washington under Biden/Harris refused to take action against The Hague ambush gangs and preferred instead to issue meaningless messages. The corrupt PA knew that they were immune to any sort of censure and continued to reward terrorists as the Biden Administration poured more money into bottomless buckets.

Every time that Israel took pro-active measures to eliminate terrorist leaders and thwart their nefarious intentions the Biden Administration was quick to distance themselves from any involvement. “It wasn’t us and “we knew nothing about it” became the standard mantra. The obviously intended intention was to create distance between the USA and Israel to placate the UN and other knee-jerk Israel haters. Needless to say, Iran took note of this US less than wholehearted support of Israel.

Taking all this into consideration, it was, therefore, with some incredulity that I read the outgoing Ambassador’s reasoning for Biden’s re-election collapse. He stated, “that Biden’s support for Israel amid huge opposition in the media and parts of his own party contributed to the collapse of his re-election bid.” In actual fact, foreign policy matters ranked very low on electors’ minds.

Crime, massive border illegal infiltration and the cost of living together with a gathering negative reaction to woke policies all contributed to sinking the Democrats. The incumbent’s increasing inability to articulate clearly and his increasing cognitive disconnect also had a part to play in his downfall.

Another failure has been an inability to deal with a rising tsunami of hate and incitement on university campuses against Jewish students and faculty. Many of these places of learning have become hubs of uncontrollable violence and virtual “no go” areas for anyone supporting Israel.

Worthless words of disgust are no substitute for resolute action. Unfortunately, this is what has occurred as the mindless mobs receive encouragement from every anti-USA revolutionary group and their supporters on the extreme left of the Democratic Party.

It is certain that the incoming Administration will hit the ground running on many fronts.

How will they impact Israel in general and American Jews in particular?

As someone who has a cynical view of politicians and their promises it would be foolhardy to claim at this stage that a golden age is about to dawn. There have been too many past occasions when expectations have foundered and harmful policies enacted.

At first glance, the nominated officials awaiting confirmation, as well as others, seem more aligned with realities on the ground. The incoming US Ambassador is a long-time Evangelical supporter and friend of Israel who makes no secret of his wholehearted embrace of Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. This makes a welcome change from previous representatives who could never bring themselves to speak about these places being part of Israel going back over three millennia.

The incoming Secretary of State is also a staunch supporter of Israel’s historical legitimacy and seems unlikely to admonish Israel on a weekly basis with a series of “don’ts” and gratuitous advice. Others already nominated also have a positive track record when it comes to confronting terror and hate.

Will university administrators be held to account for the runaway anti-Israel/Zionist and Jew intimidation on their campuses? If promised retribution and sanctions materialize it will be a welcome start.

How will the isolationist wing of the Republican Party and the American “firsters” influence Trump and Vance when it comes to tackling international terror threats?

Can we expect decisive action against Iran’s malign intentions against Israel and, indeed, other democracies? Will the expected nuclear breakout be thwarted in time?

Sanctions against The Hague-based courts are promised. Will this be the start of determined action against UNRWA and other corrupt UN bodies which have been allowed to flourish unchallenged for so long?

President Trump is touted as the ultimate “deal maker.” The only trouble is that often, deals are struck at the expense of determined action. Churchill, Roosevelt and Truman refused to make any deals with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan until they surrendered unconditionally. Will Israel be pressured to make dubious deals with those who have as their aim the elimination of Jewish sovereignty? Neville Chamberlain thought he had obtained the deal of the century when he returned from Munich. Will Trump’s desire to make deals follow the same disastrous path?

It has been reported that one of the religious leaders giving a prayer at the inauguration will be an Imam who has a track record as a Hezbollah supporter. If this is so, it would be a poor start to what we all hope might be a clear break with past woke pandering to political correctness.

Time will tell whether the new Administration is going to be a realistic breath of fresh air that sends a strong message to friends and allies that America is standing by them. Foes of democracy and those subverting international forums need to know that their efforts will attract negative and dire consequences.

Let’s hope that the incoming new brooms make a clean sweep and help to usher in a long-awaited era of peace through strength and justice.

Announcing the Stefan Moldovan Prize for 2025

Monday, January 6, 2025
Tevet 5785

We are pleased to announce the solicitation of titles for the 15th annual Stefan Moldovan Prize for Israeli Security Studies. This prestigious prize has previously been awarded to authors of outstanding Israeli security works in the Hebrew language, but this year will be expanded to include works published in English.

The Trustees of the Stefan Moldovan Foundation have generously allocated an additional $5,000 (USD) to commemorate Mr. Moldovan, a Holocaust survivor, who throughout his life demonstrated a strong commitment to the security of the State of Israel.

We invite you to submit high quality titles (published since 2021) that make a direct contribution to the security of Israel. Suitable works include those concerning military issues, news media and security, global politics, and social media all having an impact on the security of Israel. The ceremony for the awarding of the 2025 Moldovan Prize will take place in Israel on March 24, 2025, and winners will be welcome to address the audience in Jerusalem, either in person or via Zoom. The Stefan Moldovan Prize Committee will, inaddition to awarding the prize, promote the winning book on various media outlets.

Kindly attach a short bio of the author as well as a description of the book, and send two hard copies and two pdf files per title no later than February 7, 2025 to:

Dr. Yehuda Shalem
11 Shimon Street
Ofra, Israel 9062700.
Most Sincerely

Dr Ron Schleifer
Chairman of the Prize Committee

For further enquiries please contact Dr Ron Schleifer at:
ron@psyopil.org; cell: (+972) 054-5792123
https://www.facebook.com/MoldovanAward

UNRWA chief vows to continue aid to Palestinians despite Israeli ban

The UN’s Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA will continue to provide aid to people in the Palestinian territories despite an Israeli ban due to be implemented by the end of January, its director says.

“We will… stay and deliver,” UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini tells a conference in Oslo. “UNRWA’s local staff will remain and continue to provide emergency assistance and where possible, education and primary health care,” he says.

It’s not immediately clear how UNRWA will operate in areas controlled by Israel.

center in Deir el-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on November 3, 2024. (Photo by Eyad BABA / AFP)

The UN’s Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA will continue to provide aid to people in the Palestinian territories despite an Israeli ban due to be implemented by the end of January, its director says.

“We will… stay and deliver,” UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini tells a conference in Oslo. “UNRWA’s local staff will remain and continue to provide emergency assistance and where possible, education and primary health care,” he says.

It’s not immediately clear how UNRWA will operate in areas controlled by Israel.

The laws passed by Israel bar UNRWA from operating in Israeli territory and prevent Israeli authorities from having any contact with the agency.

Israel has long had an adversarial relationship with UNRWA, accusing it of perpetuating the Palestinian refugee crisis, as it allows Palestinians to maintain the status for generations both in and outside the Palestinian territories. But Jerusalem’s campaign against UNRWA intensified significantly following Hamas’s October 7, 2023, onslaught.

Over a dozen UNRWA staffers were found to have participated in the attack, and there has been a drumbeat of revelations in the year that followed regarding the extent to which Hamas has managed to infiltrate the agency.

Israel must stand up to the coercion of Qatar

Israel is now asked to free hundreds of rapists and killers who promise to rape and kill once again if they are set free.

There is no question  about it.

Israel has a responsibility to abide by the highest moral law and not free any killer or rapist who promises to kill or rape again, in exchange for the release of captives held by terrorists.

Qatar lies at the epicentre of organized crime in the Middle East. Qatar took the responsibility to sponsor the Israel organizations which demand the release of hostages in exchange for these killers and rapists.

Israel must stand up to Qatar.

Israel prides itself in leading the world with moral courage. The time has come for Israel to decide whether it’s a nation of prophets or a nation of profits. Moral voices are needed in the world to urge Israel to do the right thing and not bow to the coercion of Qatar.

Documents Reveal Hamas’s Goal: To Deepen the Rifts in Israeli Society

Captured Hamas documents with instructions on taking Israeli hostages, even what to tell them in Hebrew. (IDF)

Documents seized in the Gaza Strip, some of which were published in the Israeli and international media, revealed a partial picture of Hamas’s goals and intentions prior to and during the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel. The files also revealed the plans of Hamas’s decision-makers and their expectations from Iran and its proxies.

The Hamas documents seized in the Gaza Strip revealed that the terrorist organization’s goal was to widen the divisions within Israeli society before and during their attack. Since October 7, 2023, various media outlets in the United States, England, and Israel have received dozens of documents from the IDF that were seized in the Gaza Strip. Those outlets published partial translations of those documents; in most cases, the original documents were never presented to the public. The IDF itself has not published copies of these documents, even though many months have passed since their contents were reported in the media.

Some of those publications were published on the “Uvda” investigative Israeli TV show and Sky News, as well as a translation of a section of a document published by an IDF spokesman. We present here new information from those parts that have not yet been translated or published by television networks. The main points are:

  1. Hamas’s directive to authorize “relevant parties to act to deepen internal contradictions” in Israel, primarily between the Jewish population and non-Jewish minorities.
  2. Hamas concluded from the statements of IDF leaders that Israel had a deep fear of an Israeli ground military operation in Gaza, that Israel was deterred by Hamas’ defense plan based on tunnels, and that consequently, Hamas prepared its offensive plan against Israel.
  3. On January 7, 2024, The Sunday Times published the contents of documents seized by the IDF in the Gaza Strip, which were prepared for Hamas leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar. One suggestion was to torch pictures of Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Israel to sabotage Israel’s relations with Turkey. The contents of the documents indicate that they were written in the summer of 2023, likely before Turkey’s President Tayyip Recep Erdogan’s meeting at the UN with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on September 20, 2023.Three pages of these documents were aired in a report on Sky News in Arabic on January 7, 2023, and their translation follows:

    Page 1 – Boosting the Power of the Attack

    [Topics] Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas

    Politburo Secretariat

    Gaza region

    Politburo meeting minutes

    Conclusions on the political situation

    The National Arena

    • [We urge] Caution against those who are involved in the [Palestinian] Authority’s and security apparatus’s campaign in [stoking] internal conflicts, and complete avoidance of any participation at the level of leaders or [representatives of our] organizations in this.
    • Increase the intensity of [Hamas’s] unofficial attack on the [Palestinian] Authority and security coordination [with Israel] since the continuation of [the existing situation] helps them, causing a rift between them and the Fatah [movement] and its national militant wing.
    • An attack based on the Islamic faith through dawah to formulate a comprehensive plan to combat the fascist right-wing government and its policies in Jerusalem, Al-Aqsa [Mosque], prisons, etc. [majority vote] [13 in favor, 5 against].
    • Forming a very broad national unity around the overall plan to combat the fascist right-wing government and continuing the policy of developing the leadership of national action.
    • Striving to curb any differences of opinion with the Islamic Jihad, avoiding any friction or clashes with the [Islamic] Jihad, and being diligent in containing and absorbing them. The Resistance’s gain is also the [Islamic] Jihad’s.

    Page 2 – Authorize the relevant parties to act to deepen internal contradictions

    • Diligent persistence to export the fundamental principles [regarding] the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Jerusalem, the resistance, the struggle against the settlement, the prisoners, etc.
    • Continued support for the resistance in the [West] Bank by all means, by participating in developing its capabilities and as soon as possible in Jenin, by providing technical support and advice to the resistance, and by being ready to actively participate in a situation where the resistance is in existential danger.
    • The highest level of security caution and vigilance.
    • The highest level of military readiness and preparedness.
    • Continuation of the foreign media campaign against the fascist right-wing government and its actions, and turning the spotlight on the actions of the settlers and actions that infringe upon the judicial law and international resolutions.
    • Authorization of the relevant elements to work to deepen the internal contradictions in [Israel], the occupying entity, especially with the special communities (Arabs, Bedouins, Druze, Circassians, etc.).

    Page 3 – Promote the armed struggle in the “West Bank” arena

    • Increase activity to consolidate the Jerusalem-resistance axis, formulate the united front plan, and mobilize all the resources of the [Arab and Islamic] nation, especially those who have been harmed by the occupation and its policies.
    • Urge the Turkish leadership to address the seriousness of welcoming [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu at this time, when the American administration and the Europeans still refuse to meet him and his ministers, so that Turkey will not be the one to break the state of isolation that the [Israeli] entity is experiencing.
    • We will have a] proactive media campaign aiming to prevent the meeting, and in case the meeting is still to take place, we will not place restrictions on [our] brothers to express their [opposing] positions and opinions.
    • The Gaza leadership’s decision [by general agreement] not to negotiate with Jordan or succumb to its pressure to stop assistance [in arms smuggling and operational guidance] to the [resistance] in the [West] Bank. [We will] examine the relationship with Jordan and emphasize the necessity of maintaining activity through this strategic arena with long borders [with Israel] and a large Palestinian presence.

    This document reflects Hamas’s determination to advance the armed struggle in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) front, to prepare its forces in the Gaza Strip for military action within the framework of the concept of unifying the regional conflict fronts, and to continue Hamas’s efforts to deepen the divisions in Israeli society.

    In the “Uvda” TV show on March 7, 2024, a fragment of a page of a document seized by the IDF in the Gaza Strip was briefly shown. Below is its translation:

    In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

    Summary of the small council meeting in the presence of Brother Abu Ibrahim [Yahya Sinwar’s alias] Assessment of the situation – [handwritten word erased] – the internal apparatus [referring to Hamas’s security/intelligence apparatus] – [Department of] [Armaments] Production – [Department of] Finance] – [Department of] [Security] Prisoners – [Lebanon] Arena] – the Government

    [Missing paragraph] Things will expand. We will act on this matter as much as we can find a way to act.

    We have concluded that the political conditions and the forces on the ground on which this Zionist government is based will assist us in carrying out the great project.

    Also, the nature of the relationship we are working on with the [Iranian] Axis of Resistance and the possibility of achieving [missing section] A campaign with Iran or the axis [axis of resistance] as they have committed [missing section]

    The [intelligence] assessment of the situation on the ground was presented in two parts: The first: the maneuvers [military exercises] that the enemy recently conducted in the southern command, and in particular the exercise of the northern brigade of the Gaza Division. Also, the military training with the American “air force,” A discussion was held, and an assessment was made by the [Department] of Operations regarding the nature of this military training, according to which these are mostly training of a specific nature and not comprehensive.

    The second: [Itamar] Ben Gvir’s raid into the Al-Aqsa [mosque]. The recommendations presented in the military intelligence assessment of the situation were emphasized. Security vigilance was emphasized, and the military intelligence department shared intelligence forecasts regarding the enemy’s intentions [as] for strategic thinking regarding a preemptive strike by the enemy.

    The violations and attacks of the enemy at the Al-Aqsa [Mosque] were discussed. There is no doubt that the enemy will increase the attacks against the Al-Aqsa [Mosque] in the near future, and it is estimated that the enemy’s next holiday period is “Passover” 4/6. It was agreed that it was necessary to postpone [initiating] the small clashes [along the Gaza border] until a time when something big [implying, a significant Israeli move in connection with the Al-Aqsa Mosque] takes place, and on this basis, military intelligence was required to evaluate the position of this new government and the new military command [on the Palestinian issue and especially with the Gaza Strip.]

    On December 21, 2023, military correspondent Yossi Yehoshua wrote in “Yediot Aharonot” (page 3 of the newspaper):

    As part of the IDF’s operation in Khan Yunis, the IDF has obtained new documents that detail the Gaza Hamas leader’s basic assumption, according to which the Shiite Iran-Hezbollah axis will not stay on the sidelines. In a situation assessment document obtained by Yedioth Aharonot, Sinwar wrote to his men: “We received a commitment that the axis will participate in the great liberation project due to the nature of the relationship we have.” In additional documents, he reiterates the commitment he received, according to which the operation in the south will entail a parallel operation in the north, for which Hizbullah has been training under the banner of “conquering the Galilee.”

    This document reflects the understandings that Hamas reached with Iran and Hizbullah within the framework of the unity of the fronts of confrontation, centered on building a military front intended to liberate Palestine in a pre-coordinated military move while exploiting the element of surprise. Ultimately, Sinwar chose to attack Israel without pre-coordinating the date with Iran and Hizbullah, in the belief that the axis of resistance, including the Arabs of Judea and Samaria and Israel, would inevitably join the battle.

    The newspaper “Yediot Aharonot” did not publish the original documents.

    On September 4, 2024, the IDF Spokesperson’s website published in Arabic documents seized in Gaza, which documented a conversation that took place in August 2022 between a senior Hamas figure, identified only by the first name Ahmed, and the commander of the military wing of Islamic Jihad, Akram al-Ajouri.

    Below is a translation of a section that was not translated by the IDF spokesman, in which the senior Hamas official explains the organization’s security concept vis-à-vis Israel, which is based on a defense plan that deters Israel from ground action in the Gaza Strip while simultaneously preparing an offensive plan against Israel:

    There are two parallel efforts, defensive and offensive, with a clear continuation of the defensive effort, and it is done within the framework of a concept related to achieving security for Gaza as a base of resistance and preventing a ground [military] campaign. In practice, we have achieved the goal. Today, the Israeli army opposes a ground campaign, and it regards it as its last course of action, and it presents the political echelon scenarios of 700 deaths if it invades Gaza. This does not occur in a vacuum but is a result of the defense plan, and the conditions in which the resistance operates today are a result of this defensive effort and also a result of the investment in offensive activity… We may not use our [military] equipment and our tunnels, but without them, we could not secure Gaza as a base of resistance.

    The document expresses the collapse of the Israeli concept of deterrence in the eyes of Hamas, which based its assessment, among other things, on the position of the IDF’s senior command, which warned the Israeli political echelon of the possible severe implications of a ground operation in the Gaza Strip.

    On October 12, 2024, journalists Ronen Bergman, Adam Rasgon, and Patrick Kingsley revealed in an article in the New York Times the contents of 30 pages documenting ten secret meetings held by senior Hamas officials, which dealt with planning an attack to capture military bases and settlements around the Gaza Strip.

    The Times article cited only partial quotes from the documents that documented the secret discussions, which were held with the participation of Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’s leader in the Gaza Strip, Muhammad Deif, the supreme commander of the Al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s military wing, Marwan Issa, Muhammad Deif’s deputy, and Muhammad Sinwar, commander of the Al-Qassam Brigades’ southern Khan Yunis brigade and Yahya Sinwar’s brother. The newspaper did not present a copy of the documents. It sufficed with a brief report on some of their content.

    On October 12, 2024, the Washington Post published short excerpts from 59 pages of documents seized by the IDF in Gaza, which dealt with Hamas’s plan to attack Israel and Hamas’s appeal to Iran for financial assistance that would advance the plan to destroy the State of Israel within two years. The newspaper presented a small number of copies of the documents that were handed over to it.

    As reviewed above, seized documents, comprising at least 30 and 59 pages, that were seized by IDF forces were passed on to media outlets in Israel and abroad, but the IDF spokesman chose not to make them available for the Israeli public to review.

    The writer contacted the IDF Spokesperson three times in writing (October 19 and 28 and November 4, 2024) and once orally (IDF Spokesperson’s Office) to receive a copy of the Hamas seized documents released to the media. I stated that the documents the IDF passed on to the media “are very essential for research and are unclassified” and that “I would be grateful for a copy of these documents being passed on to me to continue research on this subject.” No response was received from the IDF.

Will Netanyahu Put Israel On Trump’s Doormat List?

Days away from President-elect Trump’s inauguration, it appears that Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu may set the catastrophic precedent of succumbing
to pressure to accept an unacceptable “deal” with Hamas.

If you only care about the next five minutes – or even seven days – then
being spineless today to please Mr. Trump makes sense.

But for someone concerned about Israel’s future over the next four years and
beyond, being spineless today is not an option.

Because if Mr. Trump and his team see that Binyamin Netanyahu is spineless
today, this “doormat” status will stain the relationship throughout the
entire Trump administration and beyond.

Don’t get me wrong: it’s not that Donald Trump doesn’t like the Jewish
State. It’s just the practical matter that if Israel is willing to be a
“doormat,” then in the worldwide balancing act that a president must
perform, the needs and concerns of “doormats” become less important than
those of others.

And a technical historical note: if Mr. Netanyahu allows us to be doormats,
our American friends and supporters associated with Mr. Trump face a
tremendous dilemma when it comes to pushing Trump for Israel:

#1 They don’t want to find themselves pushing for something that the Prime
Minister of Israel is willing to ultimately concede.

#2 There is nothing more embarrassing for someone whose reputation is based
on their ability to influence others than to put that ability to the test
and fail.

So if Mr. Netanyahu thinks that somehow we will be rewarded later for being
a doormat today, I fear that he is engaging in the most dangerous,
self-serving kind of wishful thinking.

Will the devil Arafat Arfa’ia also be released in the deal?

5 years ago, the terrorist Arafat Arfa’ia, who went out to carry out an attack wearing a kippah, came across a 19-year-old girl in a secluded area near the Biblical Zoo, Ori, who loved to be alone – draw and write in nature.

Arafat stabbed her several times and dragged her 150 meters while she was still alive, then raped her. During the rape, he continued to stab her until he almost beheaded her.

The monster in the form of a man who didn’t stop smiling throughout his trial received a life sentence plus 20 years.

Pay attention to how he answered in his interrogation. Check why he’s happy.

Arfa’ia: I made my parents very proud of what I did.

Investigator: How does murder and rape bring about pride?

Arfa’ia: I didn’t just rape someone,

I murdered a Jewish woman. You won’t be able to understand this because our thinking is different.

If you ask anyone standing at a military checkpoint if they would be happy to kill a Jew…
You will see that I did everything an Arab dreams of.

Interrogator: Why didn’t you do it a while ago if you so desired it?

Arfa’ia: That’s not what Allah planned for me (laughs)
The murder is the best and most important thing I’ve ever done in my life.
If she had stayed alive it would have meant that I had failed in what I had planned and had not succeeded in the mission, that would have been the hardest feeling I’ve ever felt in my life.

Arfa’ia: I planned to enter Jerusalem through the forest to kill Jews.
I wanted to kill several Jews and not just one, but when I was there
I saw that Allah had sent me the Jewess and I realized that I had to kill her. This was the fate that Allah had summoned for me.

Arfa’ia: I planned to enter some place, wearing a kippah so that they would think I was a Jew, and stab as many Jews as possible to kill them.
If I hadn’t met the girl on the way, I would have entered Jerusalem to carry out the attack and murder Jews.

Arfa’ia: After I murdered her,
I stayed by the body for a while longer, waiting for more Jewish people to come and surprise them and stab them with a knife and kill them….
If I had died while trying to kill more Jews, for me it would be a blessed thing because I would have died a martyr.

And these are the kind of monsters we are about to set free as part of the deal.
I feel sorry for the families of the kidnapped, but who thinks about the families of the victims?

Desperate Israeli left panics as Trump inauguration nears

Israeli leftists continue their long-standing tradition of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory as they force the Israel Defense Forces to fight with one hand tied behind its back.

JNS senior contributing editor Caroline Glick examines exactly how they are doing this and why it’s so difficult to stop them.

She also covers the Israeli media’s latest fake polls; a possible winning war strategy; humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip; and opposition leader Yair Lapid’s latest insane comments. All this and more on “In-Focus!”

 

The hostages Deal – Behind the Closed Doors

From the reports coming out of Qatar through Arab media, it’s possible to assess what’s happening behind closed doors in Doha. What’s noteworthy is that parallel to the talks in Doha, an Arab summit on Syria’s future is taking place in Riyadh, and the participants in Riyadh are closely following the developments in Doha, with both events influencing each other. If an agreement on Gaza is reached, the entire Middle East will enter a new era, which will also draw in Syria—positively so, as strengthening Sunni Arab states in Gaza will strengthen them in Syria as well, and will check Turkey’s influence. The Riyadh talks include a Turkish representative, and Turkey’s future in Syria vis-à-vis Arab influence is undoubtedly being discussed there, with a Gaza agreement potentially giving momentum to Arab states in Syria as well.

What can already be said is that the agreement with Hamas will be implemented in phases, though the parties are struggling to establish a tight timeline for the three phases. The nature of the first phase is more or less known—it will be humanitarian both in terms of the type of released individuals, both Israeli and Palestinian, and in terms of increased humanitarian aid to Gaza.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu favors the phased approach because the final destination is already agreed upon—the end of the war. This is what Trump wants. On this matter, he’s aligned with Egypt, which also wants the phased approach, but for different reasons, in contrast to Qatar which wants a single comprehensive agreement.

Bibi wants the phased approach because it’s in his nature. What can be postponed is postponed, but mainly he wants to buy time to convince Smotrich and Ben Gvir not to leave his government. As long as the war hasn’t ended, they can justify their staying in the government, and until we reach the moment of truth when the dream of renewing settlements in Gaza dissipates, there’s still time for maneuvering.

Qatar wants tight phasing, in one sweep, to ensure Israel won’t harm the Hamas leadership remaining in Gaza. The war’s end is supposed to include guarantees for the safety of surviving Hamas leaders, and the sooner the better.

Egypt favors phasing because it has thus far failed to convince Abu Mazen to agree to a joint formula with Hamas on managing the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing. It actually has an interest now in postponing the renewal of Rafah crossing operations to the third phase, hoping that by then a saving formula will be found. Egypt understands that a team agreed upon only by Hamas is problematic—to say the least.

Therefore, what Egypt and Qatar have agreed upon is phasing, but with all phases tightly linked to each other, a sort of compromise between the two approaches. The problem is that this agreement between the mediators faces reality on the ground, as Hamas-Qatar doesn’t control what happens in Gaza, and Hamas leadership in Qatar is unable to provide an authoritative list of living hostages and those who didn’t survive, and in its predicament published the list it received from Israel…

For lack of choice, and to meet Trump’s deadline, it seems we’ll again witness a first-phase deal, with subsequent phases not tightly linked to it.

When we reach the war-ending phase, Netanyahu will face the crisis of his absolute victory crumbling, and then they’ll need to search for wording about the war’s end that doesn’t mention the war’s end…

The uncertainty regarding the hostages to be released affects the number and nature of prisoners Israel will release. It’s clear that in the first, humanitarian phase, elderly and ill prisoners with no security or political significance will be released. However, if it turns out that fortunately there is a high number of living hostages, Israel will need to release heavy terrorist prisoners like the two Barghoutis—Marwan Barghouti, who has an aura of national leadership, and Abdullah Barghouti, a serious terrorist whose release is truly a difficult decision.

In general, the entire large Barghouti clan has shifted to Hamas’s side and pro-Iranian terror organizations, due to the harsh treatment by the PLO leadership in Tunis toward local leadership, and especially because it didn’t lift a finger to release the Barghouti sons from Israeli prison, in contrast to Hamas’s efforts to release its prisoners in various deals with Israel.

This matter of releasing heavy terrorists is the main issue troubling the settler leadership, and this might be the last straw for Smotrich. Struk indeed justified her opposition to the deal precisely on this issue—”the price” Israel will be required to pay.

It can be assumed that in Netanyahu’s talks with Smotrich, this issue is also addressed, and one can guess that he promises him that the heavy terrorists will be deported to Turkey and won’t endanger the settlements.

One hopes this won’t happen, as it’s preferable to have these dangerous terrorists under our watch rather than with Erdogan who would inflate them to monstrous proportions.

But this sectarian government is prone to making anti-state decisions, as that’s its nature.

 

American Residents of Judea, Samaria Sue Biden Administration Over Sanctions

The settlement of Yitzhar in Samaria, near Shechem, off Route 60, north of the Tapuach Junction.

YITZHAR, ISRAEL - NOV 20, 2009 : A general view of the settlement Yitzhar. Yitzhar is an Israeli settlement located in the Samarian mountains of the West Bank near Nablus/Shechem just off Route 60 north of the Tapuach Junction. The Hebrew term 'Yitzhar' is a biblical term, meaning high quality olive oil, and derives from one of the region's major industries. The village was originally established as a pioneer Nahal military outpost and demilitarized only a year later when turned over to residential purposes in 1984 with the assistance of the Amana settlement organization. Photo by Gili Yaari / Flash 90 *** Local Caption *** ???????
????
??????
????

A pair of Israeli-Americans filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration on Thursday alleging that it had improperly imposed sanctions on them under an executive order intended to combat “extremist settler violence” in Judea and Samaria.

Matthew Mainen, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs on behalf of the National Jewish Advocacy Center, told JNS that the case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, raises basic questions about the rights of U.S. citizens to due process under the law.

“American citizens have a right to be heard and to challenge the government before the government takes action against them or deprives them of some interest,” Mainen said. “The Biden administration, with what appears to be zero due diligence, did just that.”

In February, U.S. President Joe Biden Biden issued executive order 14115, “on imposing certain sanctions on persons undermining peace, security and stability in the West Bank,” which was intended to combat “extremist settler violence” in Judea and Samaria that the Biden administration had determined to be undermining a path to a two-state solution.

The text of the order says that it could be applied to any “foreign person” that the Biden administration determines to be undermining peace and security in the “West Bank,” but makes no provisions for U.S. nationals.

The plaintiffs, Issachar Manne and Yitzhak Pilant, allege that as U.S. citizens they should not have been subject to the order and say that the claims the U.S. State and Treasury Departments made about them were false.

“The State Department’s accusations are entirely false and appear to be based on a ‘comprehensive dossier’ submitted just a few days prior to the sanctioning by Democracy for Arab World Now (DAWN), an organization whose board members have ties to the extremist Muslim Brotherhood and have praised Hamas, and which failed to even get plaintiff Pilant’s last name right,” the filing says.

The State Department described Pilant, whom they labeled “Filant,” as a “civilian security coordinator of the Yitzhar settlement” who had “led a group of armed settlers to set up roadblocks and conduct patrols to pursue and attack Palestinians” in February 2024.

The misspelling corresponds to a DAWN report accusing Pilant of violence against “Palestinians”, including the roadblock.

According to the suit, Pilant was not a civilian but was in fact operating under the orders of the Israel Defense Forces as a captain of the regional defense unit for Yitzhar commanding 60 reserve soldiers.

Eugene Kontorovich, an advisor to the plaintiffs’ legal team, told JNS that this was the first case he was aware of in which an IDF soldier was sanctioned by the U.S. government for following Israeli military orders.

“It’s particularly extraordinary because he’s not being sanctioned for murdering civilians, or indiscriminate attacks, or any kind of war crimes,” Kontorovich said. “He’s being sanctioned for administering a checkpoint.”

In Manne’s case, the State Department accused him of “seizing 150 hectares of land” for his sheep farm on pastures “belonging to the Palestinian community.” The lawsuit claims that Manne rents the land and grazes his sheep on property that the Israeli government says is not owned by anyone.

“Manne has never appropriated, nor has he sought to appropriate, land under private Palestinian ownership or otherwise designated by the Israeli government as private or restricted,” per the suit. “To the extent that he utilizes private property, he rents land owned by the settlement division of the World Zionist Organization, and therefore any private land he utilizes is owned not by Palestinians but by a Jewish organization to which he pays rent.”

JNS sought comment from the Treasury and State Departments.

Both Pilant and Manne are U.S. citizens by birth. Pilant was born in Israel, and his family is from Pittsburgh. Manne’s father is from California.

Mainen told JNS that while the president has extensive powers to apply sanctions to foreigners, Pilant and Manne should have been exempt as U.S. citizens.

“We’re in a different ball game when we’re dealing with American citizens who, even if they live in Israel or anywhere else in the world, they have the same rights as an American citizen in California,” Mainen said. “A line clearly needs to be drawn when you’re talking about American citizens.”

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump is expected to rescind many of Biden’s executive orders, including the “extremist settler violence” sanctions on Israelis in Judea and Samaria.

Kontorovich told JNS that even if Trump rescinds the order, Pilant and Manne have had their lives “turned upside down.”

“All their credit cards have been canceled. Everything has been canceled,” Kontorovich said. “If a government can do this to them without any process, without any investigation, without any notice, without any standards and without any oversight, this can happen again.”