IDF Spokesman: ‘European aid funds were found in Hamas tunnels’

IDF spokesman Effie Defrin delivered a statement on Sunday from an underground facility discovered beneath the European Hospital in Khan Yunis, Gaza.

Speaking from the site, Defrin condemned the use of civilian infrastructure by Hamas, accusing the group of turning humanitarian facilities into operational terror centers. “I am standing in the underground facility beneath the European Hospital in Khan Yunis. This is where European aid funds ended up – not in medical care, but in the construction of terror tunnels and infrastructure,” he said, displaying a large pile of cash located in the tunnel

“Hamas has once again made cynical use of a civilian hospital, using it not to save lives, but to facilitate death and murder. This is one of the places from which the October 7 attacks were orchestrated.”

Defrin confirmed that senior Hamas leaders had used the facility, including Mohamed Sinwar, brother of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, and Shabana, commander of the Rafah Brigade. “This is the room where Sinwar and Shabana were staying when they were targeted by IDF strikes about a month ago. We can now confirm with certainty that Mohamed Sinwar was here and was killed in the strike,” he stated. “We will continue to hunt down every last member of Hamas until we achieve the objectives of this war.”

He was joined by soldiers from the elite Yahalom combat engineering unit and the Golani Brigade, who participated in the operation to seize the compound. “We discovered large sums of money here, not for civilian use, but to fund terrorism. Along with the cash, we found a significant stockpile of weapons,” he added.

Defrin concluded by reiterating the IDF’s commitment to dismantling Hamas’s infrastructure and leadership: “This underground complex exemplifies how Hamas exploits humanitarian resources to wage war. Our mission will not end until that threat is fully neutralized.”

Research finds 90% of reports of ‘violence’ by Judea and Samaria Jews were fake

A new report published by Israel’s Regavim Movement NGO on Sunday has found that some 90% of incidents of “violence” attributed to Judea and Samaria Jews in recent years by the United Nations were fabricated.

Regavim’s 128-page research report in English, titled “False Flags and Real Agendas,” scrutinized a database maintained by the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which claims to have documented thousands of alleged incidents of Israeli “settler violence” against Palestinian Arabs from January 2016 through April 2023.

An analysis of the 6,285 incidents documented by the U.N. showed that some 90% of the alleged acts in Judea and Samaria did not take place in the disputed territory but in eastern Jerusalem, or were entirely peaceful, such as visits by Israeli Jews to the Temple Mount, Judaism’s holiest site, as well as legal activities such as civilian hikes or infrastructure work.

Filtered for verified incidents of physical violence by Israeli Jews against Palestinians, the list shrinks to just 833 cases over a period of seven and a half years, averaging fewer than 10 incidents per month, according to Regavim.

In addition, the Regavim report found that many of these confirmed cases were also misclassified or involved anti-Israel provocations orchestrated by Palestinian and foreign left-wing activist groups.

Examination of the reports also revealed that “in many of them, it is not settler violence of one kind or another, but rather the opposite: these are terror attacks by Arabs against settlers that ended with the injury or elimination of the attacker,” according to the research document.

Regavim said that the term “settler violence” has been used by global bodies, media outlets and left-wing activists to draw a false moral equivalence between Israel’s presence in Judea and Samaria and Palestinian terrorism.

“For years, we have been told about a ‘serious phenomenon’ of settler violence, but we have never been shown the data that proves that it exists,” Meir Deutsch, Regavim’s director-general, said in a statement.

“After years in which there was no pushback whatsoever against this false narrative, Regavim is presenting the facts, and they must be seen, heard and internalized in Israel and around the world,” Deutsch stated.

The Israel Defense Forces recorded 663 instances of violence by Jews against Palestinians in Judea and Samaria last year, a 34% decrease compared to 2023, when 1,005 incidents were recorded by the IDF.

Meanwhile, Jerusalem recorded thousands of Palestinian terrorist attacks against Jews in 2024, including many in Judea and Samaria.

Palestinian terrorists targeted Israeli Jews in Judea and Samaria at least 6,343 times last year, according to figures published by the Rescuers Without Borders (Hatzalah Judea and Samaria) NGO on Feb. 17.

Twenty-seven Israelis were murdered in Judea and Samaria in 2024, and more than 300 others were wounded, the group said in its annual report.

New report debunks ‘settler violence’ narrative

New houses being constructed at the Israeli settlement of Eldad, south of Bethlehem in the West Bank. Settlements are illegal under international law, yet despite condemnation from the international community, continue to expand on Palestinian land. There are over half a million Israeli settlers now living in the Palestinian West Bank. If passed, the Occupied Territories Bill would make it illegal in Ireland to trade in goods produced from these settlements. Photo : Garry Walsh/Trócaire.

The “settler violence” campaign, which claims that violence against Arabs by Jewish “settlers” spiked post-Oct. 7, 2023, is based on fraudulent numbers, according to a report published on Sunday.

The campaign’s goal, according to the report, is to defame not merely the Jewish communities of Judea and Samaria, but the Israeli army and by extension the entire State of Israel.

The 125-page report, “False Flags and Real Agendas,” produced by Israeli NGO Regavim, describes the “settler violence” smear as a “modern-day blood libel.”

The report dissects the narrative and the numbers behind the slander, which went into overdrive following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack. A flurry of news items appeared in the liberal mainstream press in the United States and elsewhere about escalating “settler violence” in Judea and Samaria.

These reports claimed that Jewish violence had increased in retaliation for the Hamas massacre. “The breadth and intensity of the violence has revived memories of the ‘nakba,’ or catastrophe, during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were forced from their homes, never to return,” reported The Washington Post on Nov. 9, 2023.

In February 2024, the Biden administration, for the first time, sanctioned Israelis it claimed had engaged in violence against Arab civilians, citing “high levels of extremist settler violence, forced displacement of people and villages and property destruction.” It would sanction more Israelis in subsequent months, along with certain pro-Israel NGOs. (Regavim was threatened with sanctions though none were applied.)

The Biden White House justified its interference in another country’s internal affairs by claiming that Israel’s government had not done enough to “hold accountable extremist settlers who commit acts of violence,” in the words of then-State Department spokesman Matthew Miller.

While the Trump administration has cancelled the sanctions, other countries, such as France, have gone still further, calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state. One of their arguments is that the Palestinians require a state to protect them from violent “settlers.”

The campaign received a “shot of steroids” after the Oct. 7 attack because those promoting a Palestinian state felt the need to create moral equivalence between “Hamas and settlers,” Naomi Kahn, director of the International Division at Regavim, told JNS.

If Jewish residents just want to live in peace while the other side engages in mass murder, it’s much harder to justify kicking the former off their land. So it’s necessary to demonize the Jewish side, she explained.

However, the smear campaign goes beyond the issue of Judea and Samaria, she said, noting there’s a reason the radical groups behind the campaign repeatedly claim Israeli soldiers “accompany” the Jewish attackers.

“More than delegitimizing the Jewish presence there, it’s about delegitimizing the moral standing of the IDF. It’s portrayed as the army that allows this immorality to happen. By attacking the army of the Jewish state, you attack the entire Jewish state,” she said.

The problem for those looking to delegitimize Israel through the “settler violence” claim is that the data doesn’t support their narrative.

Regavim’s report notes that “a core part of this targeted defamation activity” is produced by groups with severe anti-Israel bias, such as B’Tselem and Yesh Din, which started collecting Arab testimonies of “settler violence” in 2005.

In 2008, the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) followed suit and started publishing numbers based on reports and data from these left-wing groups. It is the “authoritative,” supposedly objective, source cited most in the media.

The United Nations pays the salaries of some of the groups that supply the numbers, according to Kahn. “They pay them to create the narrative, and then they take that narrative and say, ‘Here’s your proof.’ But they’ve paid them to create that proof. It’s very circular.”

None of OCHA’s sources can be considered impartial or independent, she noted. “The Palestinian Authority’s Colonization & Wall Resistance Commission is not an objective source. It’s like quoting the Hamas Health Ministry.”

For its report, Regavim obtained 10 years of detailed incident reports from OCHA. It found that the vast majority of incidents, 98%, didn’t involve Jewish civilians at all.

“We took out all of the incidents in which there were no civilians involved on the Israeli side, meaning these were clashes with the IDF. We were then left with only 2% of the original number,” said Kahn.

“We analyzed that 2% and we cross-referenced it by date and location with the police and Shabak [Israel Security Agency] reports. What we found was in an overwhelming majority of cases, it was self-defense by Jews, or it was undetermined—a two-way scuffle. So you can’t actually call that settler violence,” she said.

According to B’Tselem’s own data, in 2022 every Palestinian recorded as killed by Jewish civilians in Judea and Samaria was “in fact killed as a result of either an attack or attempted attack carried out by that individual or by another Palestinian,” Regavim’s report notes.

Other incidents classified as “settler violence” included Jewish hikers entering archaeological sites in Samaria (no clashes involved), car accidents, road paving by the Israeli government and in one particularly absurd case, “an Arab worker who was bitten by a dog in the settlement where he was employed.”

Although OCHA claims each incident is verified by two independent sources, Regavim learned this is not the case. “Almost none of them were. The ones that had two sources—it was actually the same source under two different names. They would use the Arabic name and the English name for the same Palestinian Authority ministry,” said Kahn.

While Regavim stressed that Jewish violence does exist, and should be punished when it occurs, the numbers it says are so small as to be negligible.

“If you’re an American living in a city with a population comparable to that of Area C [the Israeli-controlled part of Judea and Samaria], you’re more than 300 times more likely to be the victim of violent crime than you are if you’re an Arab living in Area C,” she said.

“Israeli police statistics for violent incidents nationwide place Judea and Samaria at the bottom end. It’s the least violent society in Israel. So to say that this is a problem, that settlers in Judea and Samaria are violent, is simply a lie,” she added.

Blasts from the past

Can history repeat itself, and is it happening these days in front of our eyes?

Without a shadow of a doubt, the answer is in the affirmative.

Can we avoid making the same mistakes in response?

Yes, but only if we are prepared to change course and act proactively.

A first step is recognising that there are indeed problems threatening us personally as Jews and collectively as communities in the Diaspora. This needs to replace any sort of denial that there is any problem. Wishful thinking that “things will blow over” given time and a low profile needs to be abandoned as quickly as possible.

Finally, whether one likes it or not, solidarity with Israel must be paramount. This does not mean blind agreement with all policies and actions. It does, however, require an unqualified affirmation that a restored Jewish sovereignty is not only legitimate but also historically mandated.

The inevitable by-product of slogans articulated daily, such as “globalise the intifada” and “from the river to the sea”, can now be seen in an increasing number of countries. An endless stream of ill-informed invective issuing forth from political leaders is culminating in a mass demonisation of Israel. Actual facts are ignored in the race to embrace the web of lies spun by Hamas and their willing accomplices.

In a direct blast from the past, Israel and Jews are tarred with the most outrageous accusations. The mud sticks even when it is proven that claims of genocide and mass murder are figments of deliberate disinformation. As in the past, no amount of logic and rebuttal can undo the damage already caused. Those infected with the Jew hate virus are beyond any sort of redemption.

The common denominator, whether past or current, is that the murder or attempted murder of Jews is always preceded by inflammatory rhetoric and incitement.

It makes no difference if the lies emanate from individuals or groups; the end result is always the same. Physical attacks are the inevitable corollary as can be witnessed on all continents. Once the genie of hate is unleashed, it is impossible to contain.

Ritualistic expressions of horror recycled after each physical assault and act of vandalism are worthless and merely window dressing designed to lull gullible Jews into believing that something is being done.

More often than not, one can predict likely events that are bound to occur. The signs and omens are clearly indicated.

A German Jewish student leader admitted that “antisemitic hate is part of our daily lives.”

The German Chancellor claims that Israel is no longer “justified” in its Gaza campaign. Presumably, this means that Hamas is entirely justified in still holding kidnapped Israelis.

Is it any wonder, therefore, that Jewish students are under attack and Jews in Germany are once again afraid to be identified with life becoming reminiscent of pre-World War conditions?

Macron of France pretends to be a “friend.” He presides over a country that is rapidly becoming a host to groups hostile to fraternity, equality, and liberty. Riots and vandalism against Jewish buildings, as well as violence, murder and mayhem, are now a normal part of French Jewish life. Macron’s embrace of the murderous “Palestinian” cause is another indicator of what Jews in that country can expect in the days ahead.

A commentator mentioned that he needs a slap of reality. Apart from his wife, it seems that nobody else is willing to do so.

France has decided to posthumously promote Alfred Dreyfus one hundred and thirty years after he was cashiered from the army. That sums up how seriously French Governments tackle Jew hate.

A recent survey in the United Kingdom found that over 80% of British Jews are afraid to display their identity. The UK Labour Government is now pandering to the anti-Israel wing of the party. Daily pontifications by the PM and Foreign Secretary, fuelled by a hostile media, contribute to the most toxic atmosphere experienced in years. Universities are hotbeds of hate, and a seething cauldron of violence lurks.

In a recent survey conducted by the European Jewish Association, 82% of Europeans do not view the fight against antisemitism as a policy priority.

In the USA, the results of jihadist indoctrination, gun violence, illegal infiltration and left-wing progressive anti-Israel demonisation can already be seen. Terror attacks are becoming common and, as elsewhere, are attaining uncontrollable levels.

The same pattern is discernible everywhere, including the antipodes, which once were havens of relative sanity and tolerance. Phil Goff, a former NZ Foreign Minister and High Commissioner to the UK (since sacked) proclaimed that “Israel doesn’t care how many innocent people it is killing.” His ignorant claims add fuel to the fire.

Did anyone notice a news item hidden away in an inside column that reported that Stalin is making a reappearance in Russia again? His resurrection takes the form of new statues and paintings appearing in various parts of the country. Hailed by many Russians as a saint and reviled by others as a murderer, his gradual return should be ringing loud warning bells for Jews.

An emerging alliance between Pakistan, Turkey and Iran should be raising red flags. Instead, it sinks from sight.

How long will it take for Jews in countries where they are already under constant threat or where the signs flash danger, to get the message?

Why do we always leave it too late and ignore the early warning messages?

Take the so-called “peace agreements” with Egypt and Jordan as examples of how easily one can be duped into believing that a new Middle East has been born.

Unlike the Abrahamic Accords, the relationship with Egypt and Jordan is cold and getting colder.

The Accords state: We support science, art, medicine, and commerce to inspire humankind, maximise human potential and bring nations closer together. We seek to end radicalisation and conflict to provide all children a better future. We pursue a vision of peace, security, and prosperity in the Middle East and around the world.

In direct contrast, no such ideals and objectives have motivated the treaties with Egypt and Jordan. Neither country has fostered and encouraged warm relationships. Apart from a lack of armed conflict and an occasional trade deal, any sort of people-to-people relationship and eradication of hate education is completely absent. Instead, there is an atmosphere of hostility. No vestige of tolerance of Israel, Zionism, Jews or Judaism is to be found.

Take Jordanian textbooks as an example of how the next generation is being radicalised.

An international study found that they justify the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led massacre, promote Jew hate and violent jihad. The text frames the destruction of “Israeli colonies” inhabited by “settlers” as a response to Israeli oppression, implicitly suggesting that the civilians who were attacked, murdered and kidnapped were legitimate targets.

The report also highlights that textbooks referencing Jews in Islamic history perpetuate harmful stereotypes, portraying deceit, treachery and hostility towards Islam as inherent characteristics of the Jewish People. A Grade 10 Islamic education textbook cited in the study teaches that jihad includes fighting enemies and defending the nation, with martyrdom presented as a religious ideal.

Concurrently, Jordanian textbooks largely omit mention of the landmark 1994 peace treaty with Israel. When referenced, it is often portrayed as a reluctant concession to the “Israeli occupation State.”

Jordan loves to convey the impression that it is the guardian of religious tolerance on the Temple Mount and has successfully sold the narrative that it alone safeguards Islamic holy sites in “occupied” Jerusalem.

The fact that most of the rest of the world has bought into this charade and continues to ignore blatant incitement highlights the failure of successive Israeli Governments and Diaspora Jewish leaders to expose these continuing scandals.

With both Egypt and Jordan promoting “Palestinian” statehood and continuing to inculcate hate in the next generation any sort of peace, security and tolerance is a mirage.

The blasts from the past will become ever more lethal unless we learn from the failures to confront danger in time.

Qatari PR Show in Washington to Focus on “Israel’s Destruction of Gaza” and “Genocide in Gaza”

  • What think tanks promote Qatar propaganda in Washington? The Arab Center Washington (ACW) and the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies (ACRPS) in Doha, Qatar.
  • The ACRPS think tank is run by Azmi Bashara, a former member of the Israeli Knesset (1996-2007) and suspected Hizbullah spy against Israel, who fled Israel and is now ensconced in Qatari academia.
  • The Doha-affiliated organizations are funded by the Qatar Foundation, a multi-billion-dollar royal family initiative that links Qatar with American universities, Washington lobbyists, and the U.S. media.

The Arab Center Washington (ACW) touts itself as an “independent, nonpartisan research organization” dedicated to enhancing American “understanding of the Arab world and providing the Arab world with insights into policy formation in the United States.”

ACW was established in Doha, Qatar, in autumn 2010 with branches in Tunis, Washington, and Paris. Today, it is affiliated with the Qatari Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies (ACRPS), an “independent social sciences and humanities institute” that employs “resident researchers and administrative staff, hosts visiting researchers, and offers sabbaticals to pursue academic research. Additionally, it appoints external researchers to conduct research projects.”

For all their claims of independence and non-partisanship, the Centers are cornerstones of the Qatari royal enterprises, led and funded by the Qatar Foundation.

Sheikha Moza in Turkey at a conference organized by the wife of President Erdogan
Sheikha Moza in Turkey at a conference organized by the wife of President Erdogan. (MEMRI)

Sheikha Moza bint Nasser, one of the richest and most influential figures in Qatar, is the chairperson of the Qatar Foundation. The political message of the foundation was reflected in an antisemitic speech she delivered in Turkey in November 2023.1

For decades, we have witnessed Israel spreading fabricated historical narratives, which were refuted by many historians, including Israeli ones. These narratives have taken over the world’s collective mind, and if someone dares to debate any Israeli narrative, he is cast aside, having been accused of antisemitism, which in itself is another problematic narrative. By ‘Semitism,’ they mean Jews, having taken a monopoly on the Semitic race, which they attribute to themselves, while denying [its application] to other nations, which speak Semitic languages, like the Arabs, the Assyrians, and the Chaldeans….

Everything we do for our brothers in Palestine, in Gaza, and in the West Bank is less than they deserve. At this point in history, they represent the honor of our nation, in a time of inferiority and determination. To the children of Palestine, I say: You were born men. With your steadfastness, you have proven how feeble and broken are the people whom we once thought to be men.

The Kangaroo Court Conference in Washington on June 11

These two Qatari-affiliated think tanks will be promoting the canards on “Israel’s Destruction of Gaza” and “Genocide in Gaza” at the National Press Club in Washington on June 11. The deck is stacked, and the lineup of speakers from nongovernment organizations and universities blessed with Qatari largesse will find Israel guilty on multiple counts of genocide.2 According to the conference announcement:

Participants will explore dimensions of loss beyond physical casualties: cultural heritage erasure, educational disruption, and the unravelling of Gaza’s social fabric. How has Gaza’s healthcare been systematically destroyed, and what are the long-term public health impacts? What dimensions of loss extend beyond physical casualties? How do events in Gaza challenge conventional understandings of genocide? What accountability mechanisms exist for war crimes, and who must be held responsible under international humanitarian law?

At the conference’s second session, titled “Palestine after the Genocide,” attention will be turned to the Palestinians’ political future, with an apparent focus on U.S. policy.

The session provides a multidimensional analysis of potential futures for Palestine, addressing internal political dynamics, international relationships, regional reconfiguration, and the evolving role of global powers. How are Palestinian political structures transforming at this pivotal moment? What dynamics are shaping Hamas’s future role? How are global solidarity movements evolving? How have events since October 7th reconfigured Middle East alliances? What shifts in U.S. policy toward Palestine can be anticipated, and what are their implications?

Sheikha Moza (center with the gold necklace), her son the Emir, and foreign university representatives, recipients of Qatari largesse.
Sheikha Moza (center with the gold necklace), her son the Emir, and foreign university representatives, recipients of Qatari largesse. “Leading institutions have established campuses and programs in Qatar – Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar, Northwestern University in Qatar, Texas A&M University in Qatar, Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar, HEC Paris in Qatar, and University College London in Qatar.” (Qatar Foundation)

The Qatar Foundation and its ACW and ACRPS affiliates provide a steady stream of “experts” to editors, media, publications, and speaking occasions in the United States. U.S. Justice Department Foreign Agent records provide an example from October 2024. The following letter is on file:

As we approach the one-year anniversary of October 7th, the following Qatar Foundation experts are available to support your coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict, Israel-Hizbullah conflict, and regional repercussions. All experts are based in Doha (GMT+3) and available for virtual interviews. Their institutions are part of Qatar Foundation’s Education City.

The experts listed in the Qatari documents include five professors from Georgetown University in Qatar and four from Northwestern University in Qatar, ready, willing, and able to discuss international law, media affairs, and international relations.3

Azmi Bishara
Azmi Bishara, director of the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies and former Member of the Knesset, addresses students of Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service in Qatar. (Qatar.Georgetown.edu)

Bishara and the Emir of Qatar
Bishara (right) and the Emir of Qatar. (Qatarileaks)

ACRPS and the Arab Center Washington, the Megaphones for Propaganda

As the name “Arab Center Washington” gives no clue to its Qatari sponsors, the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies publishes an annual survey called the “Arab Opinion Index.” The study, often cited in the Western media, doesn’t reveal its parentage. An example: the Washington Post published an article in October 2020, “What do ordinary Arabs think about normalizing relations with Israel? Our research suggests many oppose normalization but may be reluctant to say so,” by Dana El Kurd. The polling data of the Arab Opinion Index from “28,300 people in 13 countries, suggests that many Arabs are at odds with their governments on the question of Israel. The vast majority of Arabs probably oppose normalization [italicization added].” Strange language – probably and suggests – for a scientific study. What’s stranger is El Kurd’s narrative, “The UAE and Bahrain are among the most repressive governments in the Middle East. The UAE and Bahrain were not included in our survey, but we can get a sense of public opinion from how civil society reacted to the news of normalization.”

Scratch the surface, and the survey is not so strange. The Arab Opinion Index is a product of the Qatari-based ACRPS; El Kurd teaches at the Doha (Qatar) Institute for Graduate Studies. Qatar and the Muslim Brotherhood it supports, loathed and fought against the Abraham Accords and “normalization” that Bahrain and the UAE embraced. [Was the Washington Post supposed to know this? Yes.]

An Iranian Connection?

Qatar joined with Iran to fight the Abraham Accords. Some analysts have suggested that the two countries’ joint proxy, Hamas, launched its 10/7 invasion of Israel to disrupt the chance of Saudi Arabia entering the Abraham Accords tent. The Qatar-Iran nexus is reflected in the writings of Annelle Rodriguiz-Sheline, a Fellow of the Arab Center and a Research Fellow for the Middle East at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. The Quincy Institute was founded and is run by the Iranian regime advocate Trita Parsi.

Rodriguiz-Shelline is known for her public resignation from the State Department in March 2024: “Unable to serve an administration that enables such atrocities, I have decided to resign from my position at the Department of State. Whatever credibility the United States had as an advocate for human rights has almost entirely vanished since the [Gaza] war began.”4

Sheline joined with Parsi in a March 2025 Quincy paper, “Saudi-Israel Normalization: Parameters for an Acceptable Deal,” in which they wrote, “Saudi–Israel normalization would, in and of itself, neither transform nor stabilize the Middle East.” The Abraham Accords “sought to organize the region against Iran.” They called for a larger deal that would facilitate “America’s military exit from the region, a Palestinian state, and ending the Israeli occupation.” Precisely, the Iranian prescription for a Persian hegemony in the Middle East.

Conclusion

The foreign infiltration of America’s media, academia, and politics is alarming and must be investigated. Billions of dollars are spent. For half a century, from the days of Sen. J. William Fulbright, Israel’s detractors have shrieked about Israeli influence in the United States, but this author can attest from firsthand experience and liaison with the U.S. Justice Department and Federal Elections Commission that all charges are false and the activities of Jewish organizations and political activists are 100 percent kosher under U.S. laws.

The same cannot be said about the activities of countries like China, Qatar, and Iran. The work of the Justice Department’s Foreign Agent Registration Office must be expanded and toughened.

Irony of ironies, Fulbright left the U.S. Senate and had to register as a foreign agent for Saudi Arabia.

* * *

Notes

Ignore the Left-wing naysayers, Israel is winning this necessary war

The EU’s foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, says “Israeli strikes in Gaza go beyond what is necessary to fight Hamas”. Perhaps she should head to Jerusalem and give precise instructions to the IDF on what they should be doing to eliminate the Hamas terrorist regime – assuming that’s what she actually wants. She can tell them how you kill terrorists entwined into the population, hiding in tunnels beneath schools, hospitals and houses, protected by the most comprehensively booby-trapped terrain in the history of warfare, all while minimising harm to civilians.

Of course, like so many other blowhard Western politicians, she doesn’t have a clue. Fortunately the IDF does and has been waging this hugely complex war for 19 months with a combination of fighting prowess and humanitarian restraint that no other army could match. That is the true picture that I have witnessed with my own eyes, unlike the vast array of armchair commentators and rabble-rousers with their lies and distortions intended to break Israel or signal their own non-existent virtues or both.

And Israel has had unparalleled success. They have killed something like 20-25,000 Hamas terrorists, including many senior commanders. The latest of these is Mohammed Sinwar, Hamas’s leader in Gaza, blown apart in an air strike earlier this month as he was skulking in a tunnel beneath a hospital in Khan Younis. His older brother Yahya, from whom he took over the reins of Hamas, met his maker last October. Shortly before that Mohammed Deif, Hamas’s military commander, saw the same fate.

The list goes on, and many more would have joined it had the IDF not been so determined to avoid killing the hostages and where possible to avoid harm to civilians in line with their scrupulously observed obligations under International Humanitarian Law. Those who have been dispatched have been replaced, though by less experienced and less able terrorists, but I’m not sure how long the list of applicants will be for the Sinwar brothers’ uniquely hazardous job.

Kallas also rejects Israel’s latest efforts to get aid to Gazan civilians while preventing it from falling into the hands of Hamas. While she pontificates from her headquarters in Brussels with its lavish restaurants, Gazans have been enthusiastically queuing up in their thousands to collect food and even camping out overnight.

But Kallas is in good company. Hamas also rejects this aid system and has been threatening Gazans against using it. Nor does the UN like it one little bit, despite the outrageously fake assertion last week that 14,000 babies would die of malnutrition in 48 hours.

Hamas’s position is understandable. It is focused on survival and pretty much its only source of funds now is from hijacking and selling aid at premium prices. But what about Kallas, the UN and even our own Government which also does not support this new initiative?

It is hard to escape the conclusion, with the growing chorus of condemnations against Israel, that these people are terrified Jerusalem will win this war. That’s the last thing they want as it would undermine any leverage they might have in pursuit of the holy grail of a “two state solution”.

Lacking insight, or terrified of being seen to have been wrong all along, they utterly fail to recognise that a two state solution is permanently interred after Hamas hammered the final nail into its coffin on October 7 2023.

Unfortunately for the unholy alliance against its victory, Israel is going to prevail – and not just in Gaza. Prime minister Netanyahu launched a dazzling operation against Hezbollah in Lebanon last year that eliminated its overlord Hassan Nasrallah and took out much of its leadership by using explosive-laden pagers. Meanwhile the IDF shattered much of its military capability, especially the long-range missiles that existed to threaten Israel.

Hezbollah is not finished but its potential to cause harm has been dramatically degraded. It will have difficulty rebuilding as it has lost the vital terrain of Assad’s Syria, again as a direct result of Israeli action.

Iran itself, the mastermind of the jihadist plan to suffocate Israel using region-wide terror proxies, was humiliated by its failure to damage Israel with hundreds of missiles and drones, not to mention an inability to protect Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh who was taken out right next to the president’s official residence in Tehran. Even worse, the Islamic Republic is now badly exposed, following the Israeli Air Force’s evisceration of its Russian-supplied air defences.

The likes of Kallas and her faint-hearted fellow travellers have no power to stand in Israel’s path, but their words and threatened actions certainly encourage Hamas. Apart from the hostages it holds, its only card is the vilification of Israel by the international community and the accompanying weaponisation of legal warfare.

Hamas could end all the bloodshed and the deprivation overnight by laying down its arms and releasing the hostages. If the EU, the UN and those governments so eager to condemn the Jewish state actually wanted to achieve peace, they would support Israel in words and actions, and condemn Hamas at every turn.

Philadelphia’s Network of Hate

Executive Summary

Amid the proliferation of antisemitism, anti-Americanism and extremism that disseminated across America after Hamas’ October 7, 2023 massacre of Israelis, Philadelphia stands out as a major center of concern.

In this report, Canary Mission uncovers and analyzes the deeper reasons for the anti-Israel fervor that overtook the city.

Read Complete Report