Israel’s war of retribution

The operation carried out by Israel in the early morning hours of June 13 had been planned since November. If it had not been put into action, Israel would have paid with its life since it looked like Iran had nuclear bombs ready and thousands of ballistic missiles prepared to deliver them and destroy the small Jewish homeland.

The turning point came quickly, but the direction and the lies had been evident for years.

Those who understand extremist Islam know that its adherents cannot give up their eschatological mission through a political negotiation, not even with U.S. President Donald Trump. In his statements, he showed a sense of reality when he warned Iran to make a deal, but they refused.

Just like the prodigious operations undertaken by Israel to win the 1967 Six-Day War, which was built over years of preparation by the Israeli army and the Mossad—knowing that it was the fundamental aim of Egypt and Syria to destroy Israel—the attack was again prepared down to the smallest detail. As always, it’s the circumstances that compel action. The training was not only technical, but of heart and soul, to face the impossible some 1,200 miles away.

In that land, in 2006, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who combined the brutal oppression of his people with a Shi’ite mystical project to destroy the Jewish people and dominate the world, as he declared even at the United Nations, organized an international cartoon contest mocking the Holocaust. It was followed by an international conference to deny the Holocaust.

Billions of dollars, spent at the expense of the starving Iranian people, were invested in building the ultimate weapon to destroy the Jews.

Meanwhile, an iron ring was forged to strangle Israel at its borders and in its streets through terror. The Iranian masses, enslaved by the regime, shouted daily, “Death to Israel.” Hamas received the plans and weapons for Oct. 7, 2024; Hezbollah got the missiles and its very existence. Tehran exported hatred of Jews to the streets and universities of the world.

If anyone in this world polluted by lies against Israel is still capable of recognizing the truth, they will understand that a new era is here and breathe a sense of relief as evil has found someone willing to fight it.

Iranian friends, many of whom have good relations with the Jews, are grateful and hope that this finally marks the end of one of the most cruel and repressive regimes of women, dissidents and homosexuals.

Before the 1979 Iranian Revolution, problems between members of the multi-ethnic country and the Jewish people were nominal. It was the leader of the revolution, Ruhollah Khomeini, who decided to ally with the antisemitic, anti-American Communist forces, defining Israel as “a colonial imperialist state.” Other Iranian leaders, Ali Khamenei and Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, repeated the aim to destroy Israel as a partner of America’s “global arrogance.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu noted that since last year, it had become clear that while Trump was initiating talks with the Iranian regime, its leaders continued to push for enriching uranium. Its dream was not only destroying Israel but of dominating the world with a nuclear weapon in fanatical hands.

The Hamas-led terrorist attacks in Israeli communities on Oct. 7, 2023, led many to proclaim the end of the Jewish state. Hamas pointed the way with premeditated slaughter. Hezbollah attempted to follow suit on Oct. 8, launching rockets and missiles at Israel’s northern communities. The pager and walkie-talkie operation Israel facilitated last September against Hezbollah operatives, coupled with the assassination of both Hamas and Hezbollah senior leadership, led to the expulsion of Bashar Assad in Syria. The tide began to turn.

On June 13, Israel’s fight for its survival through autonomous decisions and a surprise military operation has restored the pride and, hopefully, future safety of this tiny country.

In Israel, people woke up in the middle of the night. This time, they were asked to be more prepared than usual to go down two floors instead of one, if possible. There are no wars without a price.

But this war may be the one that changes the face of the region. If Israel’s strength holds and if the Americans remain with them, even through negotiations, it may bring about a peace that says the era of attacking Israel is over, and that Israel no longer has to fight every day to survive.

Israel can see what Europe can’t: the Devil

“The cleverest ruse of the Devil,” wrote Baudelaire in 1864, “is to persuade you he does not exist.” More than 160 years later, great swathes of Leftists, Israelophobes and Western leaders appear to have fallen under this spell when it comes to the regime in Tehran.

Sir Keir Starmer delivered the usual message of pacifism on behalf of Britain. It matched that of Ursula von der Leyen and the other centrist fundamentalist European leaders, all of whom are equally addicted to the numbing opium of appeasement.

Instead of seeing a resolve for victory, we were subjected to repeated demands for “de-escalation” and “diplomacy”. Having so loudly decried the Iranian threat in recent months, even placing it in the highest category of the new foreign influence register, the Prime Minister seemed unable to connect the synapses.

By the time Israel was driven to attack, the international community had not imposed snapback sanctions on Iran. Britain even disgraced itself by refusing to help with Israel’s defence. The Ayatollah could be launching nuclear bombs at all the major cities of the West in a sulphurous haze, and David Lammy would still extol the virtues of jaw-jaw.

In central Tehran, there is a clock counting down to September 9, 2040, the date of Israel’s destruction as prophesied by the Ayatollah. The regime has enriched uranium to a level only required for military uses. When Khamenei gives speeches, the crowd chants: “Death to America! Death to England! Death to the hypocrites and the infidels! Death to Israel!” Until yesterday, Iran’s scientists could produce 15 nukes within days.

Khamenei’s pet theology lusts after the apocalypse. Triggered by the obliteration of Israel, this cataclysm will supposedly herald the arrival of the “Mahdi” to lead Shia forces to global victory. These are the convictions that drive actual Iranian foreign policy. De-escalation and diplomacy are laughable, yet this is what Israel has suffered since the Obama era. When Jerusalem was forced to act, you’d have thought the West would rally. But no. Israel was the bad guy.

We have seen this movie before. When Jerusalem destroyed Saddam Hussein’s nuclear programme in 1981, the world was appalled. “A clear violation of… the norms of international conduct,” the United Nations huffed. Two decades later, the White House quietly acknowledged that the Jews had done everybody a favour.

We may see a similar change of heart by 2045, but there will be much danger before then. Starmer and the Europeans don’t realise how outdated they sound in this new, perilous world. As Vasily Grossman put it in Life and Fate: “Only yesterday you were sure of yourself, strong and cheerful, a son of the time. But now another time has come – and you don’t even know it.”

Their era has passed. This is Israel’s century. While dogs of war bark globally and instability grips America, the countries that will thrive will be those with conviction in their values and the courage and resilience to defend them. “The world will never pity slaughtered Jews,” observed Menachem Begin. “The world may not necessarily like the fighting Jew, but the world will have to take account of him.”

With Russia and China sharpening their knives, we must not only take account of the fighting Jew but also follow his lead. Just look at Ukraine. First, however, we must accept what our grandparents learned the hard way. The Devil exists. It makes no sense to appease him.

Will Labour actually act on the Casey grooming gang report?

as the government really U-turned on grooming gangs? Six months after resisting a national inquiry into the crimes committed against young girls by men of predominantly Asian heritage, ministers have announced one. But Yvette Cooper’s statement to MPs this afternoon about the exact nature of that inquiry suggested the government had executed something a little wobblier than a U-turn.

The Home Secretary told the Commons that Louise Casey’s rapid review had recommended a national commission – with statutory inquiry powers – which will direct and oversee the local inquiries into grooming gangs that are already underway. It would not be ‘another overarching inquiry of the kind conducted by Professor Alexis Jay’, added Cooper. ‘Its purpose must be to challenge what the audit describes as continued denial, resistance and legal wrangling among local agencies.’ While it would be time-limited, the Home Secretary later told Reform MP Richard Tice that it would take around three years.

There will need to be quite a sustained storm to ensure that there is real change in policy

Is this a full public inquiry? Not quite. And it’s not quite a U-turn. But it’s enough of one for ministers to claim that they are taking grooming gangs as seriously as the row at the start of the year demanded. Detailing Casey’s ‘disturbing’ findings, Cooper said the law had

Ended up protecting [perpetrators] instead of the victims that they had exploited, deep rooted institutional failures stretching back decades where organisations who should have protected children and punished offenders looked the other way.

She added that ‘blindness, ignorance, prejudice, defensiveness and even good but misdirected intentions all played a part in this collective failure’. None of these findings are particularly new or surprising, other than the need for better data, particularly on ethnicity. On that, Cooper said Casey’s review had found the following:

In the local data that the audit examined from three police forces, they identified clear evidence of over-representation among suspects of Asian and Pakistani heritage men, and she refers to examples of organisations avoiding the topic altogether for fear of appearing racist or raising community tensions.

Given there is little that is new in what Casey highlighted, a more important question than what sort of volte-face ministers have executed is whether the new inquiry will lead to real changes. Cooper told MPs that further action was being taken to implement the recommendations of the seven-year inquiry from Jay. The recommendations from Casey included expunging the criminal records of those who had been convicted for child prostitution while their abusers walked free. The National Crime Agency will also launch a new criminal operation into grooming gangs which will develop a new operating model for police forces nationwide to ensure grooming gangs are always treated as serious and organised crime.

Both Cooper and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch spent considerable portions of their respective speeches pointing out that they had been working on this for years and arguing that the party on the other side of the Chamber had done nothing. Both of them had a furious tone as they railed against the injustice of it taking so many years for too few victims to get justice.

Badenoch – who would not normally, as leader of the opposition, respond to a statement from a secretary of state – also asked for details on what changed Keir Starmer’s mind from ‘thinking this was dog-whistle politics’. She also spent a fair chunk of time defending the Conservative record on tackling the sexual exploitation of children – something Cooper then used the report to try to repudiate.

Cooper and Badenoch also fought over whether Labour MPs had really voted against a national inquiry at the start of the year, as Badenoch claimed, or whether they were rejecting a Tory attempt to wreck the Children and Wellbeing Bill at second reading.

MPs representing areas where grooming gangs have already been uncovered, such as Paul Waugh in Rochdale, were not happy with Badenoch’s characterisation of their voting records. Waugh complained early on in the backbench responses that he felt a ‘cold fury’ while listening to the Leader of the Opposition.

That cold fury is presumably fuelled in part by the local opprobrium whipped up against MPs over that mischaracterisation of how they voted. Indeed, it was a national storm of opprobrium over a mischaracterisation that led to grooming gangs going from just one of many issues to being the dominant political story at the start of the year. Without that storm, it is unlikely Casey would have been given the audit or that there would be a national inquiry.

Given the poor record of all governments in following up the findings of all kinds of inquiries, there will need to be quite a sustained storm to ensure that there is real change in policy, not just a different sort of announcement to the one ministers intended to make when this row first surfaced earlier in the year.

The State of Israel launched Operation “Rising Lion”

The State of Israel launched Operation “Rising Lion” tonight against Iran’s nuclear and missile infrastructure, with the aim of eliminating an existential and immediate threat to the citizens of Israel and the entire world. The Iranian regime is blatantly violating international agreements, advancing towards nuclear weapons, and operating a regional terror network.

When the world is silent – Israel is acting. I call on the UN Secretary-General and the members of the Security Council: This is a moment to make moral decisions.

Stand by Israel – or you will be partners in a dangerous silence. Unlike in the past – today we have a state, we have an army, and we are not waiting for those who want to destroy us to surprise us.

Mossad ‘set up drone base in Iran and smuggled in commandos ahead of strikes’

A security official has said that Israel built a drone base on Iranian soil ahead of last night’s strikes on the country’s military and nuclear facilities.

Speaking to Times of Israel, the unnamed official said that as part of the operation, which had been years in the making, precision weapons systems and commandos had also been smuggled into the country.

Key to the operation was close joint planning between the IDF and the Mossad, the official said.

The Israeli drones were reportedly activated overnight, striking surface-to-surface missile launchers aimed at Israel.

Other missiles took out Iran’s air defences and gave Israeli planes air supremacy and freedom of action over Iran.

In addition, Mossad commandos deployed precision missiles near anti-aircraft sites in the central Iran.

The operations relied on “groundbreaking thinking, bold planning and surgical operation of advanced technologies, special forces and agents operating in the heart of Iran while totally evading the eyes of local intelligence,” the official told Times of Israel.

According to Israel Hayom Israeli military and intelligence forces collaborated extensively over several years developing comprehensive intelligence dossiers necessary for executing the preemptive assault that was “Operation Rising Lion.”

This preparations involved gathering detailed intelligence and conducting surveillance operations targeting senior Iranian security apparatus officials and nuclear scientists who were subsequently killed. These efforts ran parallel to a clandestine operational campaign aimed at undermining Iran’s strategic missile capabilities.

Throughout this framework, the Mossad orchestrated intelligence-operational and technological collaboration with IDF units and defense contractors, executing covert sabotage missions deep within Iranian territory, alongside widespread Israeli Air Force operations.

These coordinated operations targeted Iran’s strategic missile infrastructure and air defense networks. The institutional strategy required extended planning periods, demanding bold and sophisticated coordination combined with innovative strategic thinking and operational deception.

Every mission necessitated meticulous research and precision intelligence collection, cutting-edge technologies, and extensive commando force deployment operating clandestinely throughout Tehran and across Iran while evading the Islamic Republic’s security and intelligence surveillance.

Through their operational activities, Mossad operatives introduced specialized combat systems on an extensive scale, strategically positioning them across Iranian territory and directing them toward designated targets with precision and effectiveness.

This operation encompassed three distinct and sophisticated institutional operational frameworks. Initially, Mossad commando units operated throughout central Iran, deploying precision-guided weapons systems in strategic open areas near enemy surface-to-air missile installations. Upon commencement of Israeli operations, coordinated with Israeli Air Force strikes across Iran, these systems received guidance and activation signals, firing precision missiles simultaneously toward designated targets with remarkable accuracy.

Through a secondary operational phase designed to neutralize Iranian air defense systems threatening Israeli aircraft, the Mossad executed clandestine operations deploying attack systems and advanced technologies mounted on mobile platforms. As the surprise offensive commenced, these weapons systems engaged and completely eliminated their designated targets—Iranian defensive installations.

The third operational phase, according to Israel Hayom, involved the Mossad, through agent networks, establishing explosive drone facilities infiltrated deep into Iranian territory well before the attack. During Israeli operations, these explosive drones activated and targeted surface-to-surface missile launchers positioned at the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force’s Esfejabad base near Tehran, launchers that represented significant threats to Israeli strategic and civilian infrastructure.

Posting on X, the IDF said: “We can now confirm that the Chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, Commander of the IRGC and the Commander of Iran’s Emergency Command were all eliminated in the Israeli strikes across Iran by more than 200 fighter jets.

“These are three ruthless mass murderers with international blood on their hands. The world is a better place without them.”

The IDF said the attack was based on “high-quality intelligence” and “in response to the Iranian regime’s ongoing aggression against Israel.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday morning said that the operation would “continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat,” vowing to stop “the Iranian threat to Israel’s very survival.”

The IDF told JNS that the Iranian regime had been advancing a secret plan for the technological advancement of all parts of the development of a nuclear weapon, in a programme involving senior nuclear scientists working secretly.

“In recent months, this programme has accelerated significantly, bringing the regime significantly closer to obtaining a nuclear weapon,” the military stated.

A military official, discussing the operation, elaborated on the specific intelligence that made the preemptive strike a necessity at this time.

“We have been closely following developments in Iran for years,” said the official. “Recently, we identified that the Iranian regime significantly advanced towards obtaining a nuclear weapon, and its capability to act in a concrete way against us.”

He detailed three critical components of the threat that had converged. The first, he explained, was the “nuclear trigger,” adding, “The Iranian regime is advancing towards obtaining a nuclear weapon. In recent months, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published a number of reports that detail a concerning trend of the advancement of the Iranian nuclear project that goes beyond civilian usage. Yesterday, the IAEA Board of Governors declared for the first time in 20 years that the Iranian regime is blatantly violating nuclear agreements.”

Crucially, the military official revealed for the first time that this went far beyond enrichment. “We are exposing for the first time that the Iranian regime has been advancing a secret programme to assemble a nuclear weapon. In the framework of this plan, nuclear scientists and senior officials in Iran have been working to secretly develop all components needed for developing a nuclear weapon — explosive materials, the core (enriched uranium) and neutron source,” he stated.

A neutron source is a device placed at the core of a nuclear weapon, which, upon detonation, releases a burst of neutrons to initiate the rapid nuclear chain reaction required for an explosion. According to the official, the Iranian regime made a decision to advance this secret assembly, having already accumulated enough fissile material “for 15 nuclear bombs within days.”

The second component of the Iranian threat to Israel, the official noted, was “ballistic missiles.” He said, “The Iranian regime has thousands of ballistic missiles, which it plans to double, and to triple, with the understanding that this is an effective threat against Israel. We are talking about a number of missiles that, even without a nuclear weapon, represents an existential threat.”

The third component was Iran’s ongoing effort in the “distribution of weapons and arms to regional proxies,” with Israel identifying attempts by the regime to arm its proxies across the Middle East with ammunition to be used against Israel. These elements, combined with concrete intelligence obtained over the years of a plan developed by senior Iranian officials with Hezbollah and Hamas to destroy Israel, created what the official termed an immediate and imminent existential threat.

IDF Spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said in a separate English announcement on Friday,“Over the past few months, intelligence has shown that Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon. This morning the IDF began preemptive and precise strikes targeting the Iranian nuclear program in order to prevent the Iranian regime’s ability to build a nuclear bomb in the immediate time frame. We have no choice. We are operating against an imminent and existential threat. We cannot allow the Iranian regime to obtain a nuclear weapon that would be a danger to Israel and the entire world.”

The military official stressed that Israel has repeatedly warned the world about the threat.

“We have warned the world for many years,” he said, adding, “We have warned our partners across the world, publicly and privately speaking about Iran advancing, saying this is a global problem, not just an Israeli problem, if the Iranian regime has a nuclear bomb. And we understand if we don’t act now, if we don’t operate now, we’ll get to the point of no return.”

He also addressed Iran’s dual-track strategy of deception: “We understand, and our intelligence shows us that Iran is promoting this nuclear plan right now, in recent months, while the world thinks they are negotiating, at the same time they are promoting a nuclear bomb. As I said before, they have enough enriched materials for 15 nuclear bombs. They are advancing also in enrichment, but also in the weapons group. These are two places that we just cannot accept. A regime that said that their mission is to destroy us with a nuclear bomb that is secretly getting to that nuclear bomb is something we cannot accept, and we must stop it.”

Discussing Israel’s security partnerships, the official stated, “We’ve had great relationships since day one of this war with many of our partners. Leading the way was the U.S. military, saving lives. That’s not an overstatement…. As always, we have a great relations with our partners.”

The Commander of the IDF Home Front Command, Maj. Gen. Rafi Milo, urged the public to prepare for widespread alerts. “During this campaign, we anticipate widespread alerts. It is crucial that you take shelter in the best way possible, whether in your private home or in public spaces—preferably in a safe room, shelter, or protected space approved by the Home Front Command. If there are no protected spaces near you, you must enter a stairway or an interior room.”

He added, “Every civilian must be aware of the most protected space in their area. When an alert is received, you must enter the protected space and remain there until further notice. You must avoid unnecessary movement outside and refrain from driving on the road. There are challenging and complicated days ahead of us. We are strong together and prepared to defend the State of Israel.”

In its initial announcement, the IDF stated that “a short while ago, dozens of IAF [Israeli Air Force] jets completed the first stage that included strikes on dozens of military targets, including nuclear targets in different areas of Iran.”

The announcement noted, “Today, Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of the Iranian regime are an existential threat to the State of Israel and a significant threat to the wider world. The State of Israel will not allow a regime whose objective is to destroy the State of Israel to obtain weapons of mass destruction”.

The statement added that for “years, the Iranian regime has been waging a direct and indirect campaign of terror against the State of Israel, by funding and directing terrorist activities via its proxies across the Middle East, while advancing toward obtaining a nuclear weapon.

The Iranian regime is at the head of the axis responsible for all terrorist attacks against the State of Israel since the beginning of the Swords of Iron War, including by arming and funding the Hamas terror organization, which was responsible for the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre. During the Swords of Iron War, Iran even directly attacked Israel twice, firing hundreds of missiles toward the State of Israel.”

In a direct address to the Israeli public, Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, placed the operation in a historic context. “Civilians of Israel, these are decisive days, we are currently at the start of a new phase in the operation to secure our future. The IDF began Operation ‘Rising Lion’ tonight, in order to strategically strike the threats from the Iranian regime against the State of Israel. We are amidst a historic campaign unlike any other. This is a critical operation to prevent an existential threat, by an enemy who is intent on destroying us,” he declared.

Zamir continued, “We cannot afford to wait for another time to operate, we have no other choice. Recent and past events of history have taught us that when the enemy is attempting to destroy us, we must not turn a blind eye. As such, we need to fight for our existence; freedom is given to those willing to fight for it.”

He added, “I warn that anyone who tries to challenge us will pay a heavy price. We are entering this operation together with one goal—to secure a safer future for the State of Israel and its civilians; in a unified effort and faith, we will win.”

Israel derangement syndrome

A mass psychotic epidemic of pavlovian responses targeting Israel and its supporters is currently raging worldwide.

Like its close relative, Trump derangement syndrome, one has only to mention the words Israel, Zionist or Jew, in order for convulsive condemnations to be spewed forth with venomous vitriol.

In many cases, the responses are unhinged and clearly indicate latent prejudices bubbling to the surface.

There’s no cure for this malicious malady because the rot has become incestuous, infecting large swathes of humanity. True facts and logical arguments are of no avail. Appealing to a sense of logic is a lost cause because, like all such derangement syndromes, cures no longer work.

One can only expose and shine a strong light on this pathological phenomenon in the hope that those still resistant to irrational thoughts might be able to wage a counterattack against the disease.

Take the Australian Government’s revoking of a visa for Hillel Fuld as one of the latest examples of this deranged mindset.

This Israeli influencer and advocate had been booked to visit Australia and speak at fundraising events for the national ambulance service, Magen David Adom. His visa had been approved in advance and all seemed in order. Prior to his scheduled departure, some Islamic and anti-Israel groups in Australia got wind that he was arriving. They complained to the immigration authorities that this individual was an “Islamophobic” threat and likely to cause serious problems.

Quicker than you can say “kangaroo court” the Federal Cabinet Minister in charge of immigration cancelled his visa and declared him a “threat to the health, safety and good order” of Australians.

What is his alleged crime?

Obviously, being a Jewish Israeli who articulates uncomfortable truths about jihadist death cults must be one of his original sins.

The fact that his late brother was murdered by a Palestinian terrorist at a shopping centre not far from where we live obviously never resonated with the politician who rushed to ban him.

His opposition to the creation of “Palestine” in the heartland of Israel must be another black mark against him. The fact that this intended fake country would be a terror-supporting entity in our midst is irrelevant to many Israel haters and ignoramuses of history.

That was the same reason that the current Australian Government banned the visit of former Israeli Justice Minister, Ayelet Shaked at the end of 2024. Her crime for articulating uncomfortable facts was a perceived “threat to social cohesion”.

Presumably, the poisonous rhetoric articulated against Jews and Israel by Australian-based Islamic preachers poses no such threat. This must be so because there have been no consequences.

Could the fact that the Minister’s electorate has a large number of voters who identify as Muslims and whose anti-Israel views are no secret, have anything to do with his decision?

I predicted that post election the “chickens would come home to roost” and so it is transpiring. Who would have thought a few years ago that Jewish Israelis would be barred from entering Australia because they had the temerity to point out some basic home truths?

Interestingly, I searched in vain for a comprehensive report of this sordid affair on the website of the Sydney Morning Herald. I could find no mention of this scandalous situation. It may be that something was buried in an obscure part of the site but, if so, it certainly was well hidden.

What I did discover, however, was a headline which read “My grandmother fled the Holocaust. Now it is time for Jews to abandon Israel.” Revealed for all to see is the murky agenda of many in the media. What lies behind this obsessive urge to dig up disaffected self loathers in order to smear Israel?

It is a classic case of an Israel derangement syndrome on steroids infecting the Australian body politic of what was once a safe haven for Jews.

In contrast, SKY Australia has given the subject of Fuld’s banning extensive publicity.

A perfect example of how deranged news and views now dominate the media was recently revealed.

I happened to come across a YouTube presentation which asserted in all seriousness that “the Zionists did not make the desert bloom. The Palestinians did.” Anyone viewing this work of fiction would immediately be brainwashed into believing that the “colonial Jewish occupiers” took over a land which was a verdant paradise. Instead of barren land and swamps, the so-called “indigenous” Palestinians had cultivated the land since the time of the Canaanites. It was apparently the colonial Jewish settlers who falsified history in order to justify their illegal occupation.

That is how lies are sanitised and false revisionist fables multiply, all eagerly embraced by the growing legions of Zionist haters.

SKY NEWS UK provided a gem of tendentious reporting. Its headline proclaimed, “British surgeon maintains that the only people she has ever seen in Gaza with weapons are the IDF.”  There you have it in one sentence. There are presumably no armed terrorists in Gaza. The only people armed are the IDF which “proves” that Israel is engaged in “genocidal” activities.

Welcome to the deranged purveyors of deliberately deceitful news.

Another example of unhinged behaviour could easily be entitled “a life on the ocean waves.”

Starring Greta Thunberg in a leading role, this maritime farce to Gaza was always going to be a media publicity stunt designed with only one aim in mind.

It was never about sending any sort of meaningful aid to the allegedly starving people of Gaza. With less than a truckload of actual aid on board whatever would have been left after a period at sea was hardly likely to have helped more than a handful.

The sole objective right from the start was to create a hoped-for international incident whereby Israel could be pilloried and condemned. What better visuals might there be than the sight of the IDF storming the vessel, causing countless casualties and even better, sinking the boat?

One could almost hear the “humanitarian” crew salivating at the thought of a major media spectacle in the making. The closer they came to the Israeli coast the more frantic and frenetic were their social media performances. It was as though they were daring the Israelis to attack and thereby fulfil their hoped-for expectations.

The international media naturally played along with this pathetic performance. As complicit partners in this comedy of errors they reported each and every act. No doubt, prospective headlines and photos of Israeli “brutal force” to come whetted their appetites for what promised to be front-page news.

After such a build-up, imagine the devastating let-down when Israeli naval personnel calmly boarded and handed out bottles of water and sandwiches. Photos of Greta accepting this food must have been a massive blow to the over-inflated egos of the intrepid crew.

What do you do when your main props and predicted violence fail to materialise?

The fallback position was soon revealed.

Throwing mobile phones and other electronic equipment overboard was swiftly followed by accusations of “kidnapping” and “violations of international law.”  The media, sadly deprived of a spectacle, resorted to the usual misrepresentations and fudged facts.

The Israeli Government assembled the motley mob and screened for their edification a documentary on the atrocities committed by their Gaza terrorist friends on 7 October 2023, in a futile attempt to impart some actual reality. Refusing to be confused by any sort of facts, the intrepid protesters preferred neither to view nor to listen.

This is par for the course and exposes the real agenda of all those pillorying Israel.

Greta has now been flown back into the welcoming arms of all her European and Scandinavian groupies. Those who refused to be expelled voluntarily from Israel are detained and deported later.

It’s a pity that these hypocrites were not made to “walk the plank” and forced to spend the rest of their days in the welcoming embrace of Hamas. Incarcerated in the underground tunnels of Gaza and experiencing jihadist hospitality would have been a fitting conclusion to their juvenile expedition.

At least Israel has declared them persona non Greta.”

The pathogen of anti-Israel derangement is now rampaging unchecked through the foreign ministries of so-called “friendly” nations.

Stand by for further developments.

Greta refused to watch October 7 footage. But would it have changed her mind?

47 Minutes of Evil Greta Wouldn’t Watch (Judean Rose)

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

On June 9, 2025, Israeli naval forces intercepted the Madleen, a rusty, overhyped, and under-provisioned “aid boat” that sailed with great drama from Europe to Gaza. Onboard: Greta Thunberg, a few other professional protesters, and a pathetic 100 kilograms of flour.

To put that in perspective: Israel facilitates hundreds of aid trucks to Gaza every single day, carrying hundreds of tons of food, medicine, diapers, and fuel. Greta brought enough flour to feed roughly 330 people for one day—assuming Hamas or hungry mobs don’t steal it first, which is precisely what happened to UN flour shipments this week.

In exchange for this performative voyage, Greta got what she came for: selfies, headlines, and a chance to pretend she was the moral conscience of the world. But what she didn’t expect was Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz offering her and her selfie-yacht companions a front-row seat to truth.

The Film They Refused to Watch

Israel prepared a 47-minute documentary, “Bearing Witness to the October 7 Massacre,” which compiles footage directly from Hamas bodycams and GoPro devices worn during the pogrom. The footage is unsparing: rape, torture, execution, mutilation. It’s not Israel’s word against Hamas—it’s Hamas filming its own barbarism, proud, gleeful, laughing as they slit throats and shoot children point-blank.

Greta and gang were invited to watch. According to multiple media accounts, they agreed to begin, then either shut their eyes or turned away, refusing to take in more than a few seconds. Maybe they knew what they would see. Maybe they were afraid they’d lose the ability to justify their moral theater.

Maybe they already had seen it—and simply didn’t care.

Historical Precedents: Can Footage Change Minds?

Israel’s tactic wasn’t new. There’s a long history of using atrocity footage to rip the mask off sanitized evil:

·        Nuremberg Trials (1945): The Allies didn’t just charge Nazis—they made the court and the world watch what they found in the camps. British and American cameramen documented the piles of corpses, gas chambers, and starved survivors. The footage stunned even hardened prosecutors. German civilians were marched into local theaters and made to watch. Some fainted. Others wept. A few denied. But the films worked: they shattered any lingering doubt—at least for a time.

·        Vietnam (1972): The iconic photo of “Napalm Girl,” 9-year-old Kim Phuc screaming, her skin burned off, turned American public opinion decisively against the war. One picture—raw, ugly, undeniable—shifted the moral calculus more than a thousand op-eds could ever have done.

·        Rwanda (1994): In contrast, during the Rwandan genocide, footage was deliberately suppressed. The Clinton White House wouldn’t call it genocide, and CNN didn’t show rivers filled with hacked bodies. Result? Nothing was done. No outrage, no pressure, no intervention. Without images, there was no movement.

·        Israel, 2023–24: The IDF’s October 7 footage has been shown to journalists, diplomats, foreign correspondents, and lawmakers. At a screening in Los Angeles, attendees were reportedly shaken. Some demanded to see more—beheadings, rapes—in order to confront the full horror. A separate screening for foreign journalists in Israel left many stunned. And at Harvard, a screening organized by Chabad with support from Bill Ackman reportedly prompted some students to reconsider their assumptions.

But no screening has been more visceral than the one held for members of the Israeli Knesset.

On November 6, 2023, over 100 MKs watched a version of the October 7 footage at the Knesset. What followed was human, gut-wrenching, and painfully real: some parliamentarians burst into tears. Others vomited. Several ran from the room. The footage, reported by the Jerusalem Post, was described as “unbearable.” Likud MK Galit Distel sobbed and shouted, “Where is the world?” Another member said, “I have no more tears left to cry.”

A short video clip from the screening shows elected officials weeping uncontrollably and being comforted by colleagues as they fled the hall.

This is how decent people react when confronted with evil. With horror. With grief. With rage.

Now compare that to Greta Thunberg and the Madleen crew, who closed their eyes and turned their heads when given the opportunity to bear witness. These are the same people who flew across continents to play martyr in Gaza. Who accuse Israel of genocide while refusing to look Hamas genocide in the face. They couldn’t handle 47 minutes of footage—but they feel qualified to comment on 75 years of Jewish history.

There’s a word for that. But let’s just call it what it is: moral cowardice.

One Boat Does Not a Flotilla Make

The Madleen carried no aid worth mentioning, no moral compass worth respecting, and no courage whatsoever. It was a stunt—and everyone knows it. Everyone on that boat knew that Israel would be polite and diplomatic, and that they were completely safe at all times, free to watch or not watch the footage as they pleased, and offered sandwiches, bottles of water, and a free flight back to Europe, where they belong.

Israel should be commended for showing restraint—because really, Greta Thunberg’s face begs to be slapped. But no. Israel did nothing of the sort.

Fifteen years ago, during the Mavi Marmara incident, things got violent. This time? No shots. No injuries. The IDF simply rerouted the Madleen’s symbolic “aid,” through proper humanitarian channels, handed the activists sandwiches, and gave them a chance to learn something.

They declined.

Greta had a moment—a chance to really bear witness.

She blinked.

Then she shut her eyes.