US officials announced Wednesday that they’ve “helped” Israel and Hamas to reach a ceasefire and hostage deal.
Israelis are divided on the deal and protests have broken out for and against it throughout the country.
While virtually all Israelis are eager to bring the hostages home from over 15 months of Hamas captivity, many are concerned over the potential dangers of a deal that would in its first phase see the release of roughly 1,000 Palestinian security prisoners in exchange for 33 Israeli hostages, as well as the partial withdrawal of Israeli forces from key parts of the Gaza region.
The deal, which had been aggressively pushed by US President-elect Donald Trump and his emissary Steve Witkoff, gave Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu (Likud) and the Israeli public an ominous taste of what should be expected over the next four years.
Trump just forced Netanyahu to accept an agreement that is almost identical to a deal the prime minister refused to accept in July 2024 – a deal he insisted it would irreparably harm Israel’s security.
Outgoing Secretary of State Antony Blinken revealed at the Atlantic Council in Washington on Tuesday that the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority would ultimately run Gaza according to the agreement.
“Israelis must abandon the myth that they can carry out de facto annexation without cost and consequence to Israel’s democracy, to its standing, and to its security,” Blinken said.
One of Washington’s primary concerns throughout this war has been that Israel would return to directly controlling Gaza and would ultimately rebuild the Jewish communities destroyed as part of the 2005 Gaza Disengagement.
The idea of a return to Gaza has gained popularity within certain sectors of Israeli society over the last year and the Biden’s administration has appeared powerless to ensure that this wouldn’t actually take place. But now that Donald Trump is days away from being sworn in, the president-elect has fully thrown himself into the American efforts to push Israel out of Gaza.
Steve Witkoff, a Florida real estate billionaire close to Trump who’s been working with Biden administration envoy Brett McGurk to achieve the agreement, came at Prime Minister Netanyahu like a bulldozer. According to a report in the Haaretz newspaper, Witkoff even forced Netanyahu to leave his family lunch and meet the US envoy on Shabbat in order to advance the deal.
The message was clear. Trump isn’t playing games and won’t tolerate any of Netanyahu’s “tricks” this time around.
In an interview with Israeli journalist Barak Ravid following his first term, Trump castigated Netanyahu for blocking his efforts to divide the land of Israel. Trump told Ravid that he believed Netanyahu “did not want to make peace. Never did.”
While the vast majority of Israeli society and most pro-Israel Diaspora Jews bought into the fantasy that a second Trump presidency would benefit the State of Israel, what’s already become clear is that Jerusalem would have likely had an easier time maneuvering the new geopolitical reality had Vice President Kamala Harris won the election in November.
Following Israel’s uncanny achievements in this war and its emergence as the regional power in West Asia, Trump appears eager to cut Netanyahu down to size.
While it’s true that Trump’s tone towards Israel has been friendlier than that of Harris or President Biden, such rhetoric is often irrelevant when it comes to actual policy.
Since the 1967 Six Day War, it has been consistent bipartisan US foreign policy to force Israel to surrender the lands won in that war. The first Trump administration showed no deviation from this pattern. Trump attempted to force a two-state “Deal of the Century” on Israel and only failed because he was outmaneuvered by Prime Minister Netanyahu at the time.
So despite Trump’s likely genuine warm feelings towards Israel (based on a perception of Israel as an outpost of American power), he’s coming back into office with an axe to grind with Netanyahu and a sense that Israel owes him something for all the friendly gestures he made to Jerusalem prior to the unveiling of his two-state plan.
During the last 15 months of war, Netanyahu defied the Biden administration at almost every point. Washington’s attempts to tie Israel’s hands for the most part failed. This was partially made possible by the fact that most Israelis perceived Biden and his team as somewhat hostile, coupled with a perception of Biden being weak.
Prime Minister Netanyahu actually increased his own domestic popularity by proving himself able to stand up to the Americans on several occasions.
On a deeper level, Netanyahu’s defiance of Washington caused the people of Israel to enjoy significant advancement in our internal development.
The experience of continuously ignoring American demands and then succeeding at our military objective each time showed the nation that we can say no to Uncle Sam and still thrive as a result. Israel actually emerged from this multi-front war as the regional power through this process. And the public caught a glimpse of how strong Israel could be when our leaders behave like heads of an independent state.
Had Harris won the presidential election, this process of furthering Israel’s internal liberation would have likely continued. But Trump is a whole different breed of US president. For starters, his superficial pro-Israel rhetoric caused many Israelis to regress. It’s easy for Israelis and Diaspora Jews to believe that the Democrats are against us while the Republicans are on our side. But the reality is that the United States as a global hegemon struggling to retain its dominance in the world has regional interests in West Asia that are diametrically opposed to Israel’s.
It therefore stands to reason that Jerusalem benefits most from a weak leader in the White House – especially one perceived as overtly hostile to Israel.
Many Israelis on the right, especially those not ready to confront the hard realities of the US-Israel relationship, have put forward the erroneous theory that this deal is something Netanyahu actually desires – that the prime minister wants to withdraw Israeli forces from the Netzarim corridor and the Philadelphi route and to allow the Western-backed Palestinian Authority to ultimately take control of Gaza.
This analysis ignores the fact that Prime Minister Netanyahu had resisted such moves at every turn until now. Israel’s military even expanded its infrastructural presence in Netzarim in anticipation of remaining in the corridor for the foreseeable future.
Netanyahu had also successfully resisted pressure from the Biden administration to talk about a “day after” plan. This is likely because he knows that the only plan for Gaza that could serve Israel’s true interests is one that Washington and its allies could never accept – namely permanent Israeli control.
This is likely not only because Netanyahu understands that Israel needs a military presence in Gaza in order to effectively protect the country’s south but also because he sees the Gaza Disengagement as an injustice that he could envision – under the right geopolitical conditions – correcting through the rebuilding of the Gaza Jewish communities destroyed in 2005.
Prime Minister Netanyahu is more of an ideologue than he lets on. But unlike his predecessor, Prime Minister Yitzḥak Shamir, Netanyahu generally doesn’t have what it takes to confront the Americans head on. He tried a more direct approach during his first term in office and got taught a harsh lesson by President Bill Clinton. Since then, he’s adopted a style of misleading American leaders into thinking he’s on board with their plans – only to quietly sabotage those plans.
This infuriated Trump last time around.
Rightist Israelis should be careful not to place too much blame on Netanyahu for this deal. It’s true that he didn’t stand up to Trump in the same manner that he had been resisting Biden until now. But Trump is coming in hot with a score to settle and is determined to trap and impose his agenda on Netanyahu.
The conclusion those unhappy with this ceasefire and hostage deal should reach is that the US-Israel relationship is deeply abusive and dangerous to Israel’s longterm survival. Netanyahu might not be perfect but, unlike his political rivals, he’s keenly aware of the unhealthy nature of the relationship and has been taking quiet steps to increase Israel’s military and economic independence.
How the prime minister will weather the Trump storm for the next four years remains to be seen but those in the national camp should offer him the necessary support and maneuverability to bring his A-game on Israel’s behalf.
In good time, four more of our abductees were released in a well-planned event by Hamas. This event must be understood in its true light – the bottom line is that Hamas adheres to the doctrine of muqawma, resistance.
Israel’s starting point must be that Hamas is preparing for another round with Israel, that it is returning to internal terrorism against the Gazans under its rule, and that Hamas is making it clear to Ramallah and the world that it is the government of Gaza, without Ramallah.
The message to the Gazans was embedded in the handcuffs that Hamas fighters put on Hazm’s chest in Palestine Square in Gaza, and the message to Ramallah and the world was that Hamas signed the agreement with the Red Cross – it, not Ramallah.You could say that this signature is the official death certificate of the Palestinian state. There is a government in Ramallah and another government in Gaza. Period.
The ceremony with the Red Cross has another meaning. For the first time, Hamas recognizes the international organization that bears the cross, something it has refused to do until today. One could say that with this, Hamas is separating from ISIS, which sees the Red Cross as a “crusader” organization and an enemy.
This recognition is related to the fact that the released abductees were dressed in uniforms, and by doing so, Hamas wanted to say that it was moving from the stage of an ISIS militia to the stage of a state army, seeking global recognition.
It is suspected that this move is in line with, or was inspired by, the Golani state in Syria, which is a regime aligned with Hamas. It too is seeking global recognition, and is in the process of transitioning from militias to an army. Are Qatar and Turkey the mentors of these processes, which are parallel in their occurrence in Gaza and Syria? There is no proof, but that is what it seems.
The nature of the state of Gaza can be learned from the appearance of the flags that waved in the square: Most of the flags are green, belonging to Hamas, and are large and prominent. A minority are small Palestinian flags. In other words: this is the state of Hamas before it is a Palestinian state.
The nature of the state of Gaza can be learned from the appearance of the flags that waved in the square: most of them are Hamas green and are large and prominent. A minority are small Palestinian flags. In other words: this is the state of Hamas before it is a Palestinian state.
But the “Palestine” brand had significance in choosing the location for the hostage handover. Unlike the previous exchanges, in Saraya Square, this time Palestine Square was chosen. Saraya is a symbol of Hamas rule, and in that event Hamas sought to demonstrate that it alone owns the house in Gaza.
But the participation of Islamic Jihad in the liberation ceremony expresses that Hamas is not a government of Hamas alone, but that other groups are partners in it – for now, only Islamic Jihad. This is reminiscent of the process that Jabhat al- Nusra went through , when Hayat Tahrir al-Sham was formed, along with other militias.
A very prominent motif was the desire to humiliate Israel. “Zionism will not win,” was the inscription on a prominent sign printed in Hebrew and hung on the stage of the ceremony. And it can be said that in the matter of humiliating Zionism, Hamas is on the same page with important elements of the Israeli government.
The organizers put a microphone on the stage, when it seemed that one of the freed women would speak, but in the end someone convinced Hamas to give up that part. Qatar?
The desire to humiliate Israel was very evident in this ceremony. The insistence on all the signs of the Muqawama and the alliance between Hamas and Islamic Jihad – the coalition currently fighting against Israel in Jenin – should send us a clear message: the war will resume when Hamas is able to do so.
The desire to humiliate Israel was evident at the ceremony. The insistence on the symbols of the Muqawma and the alliance between Hamas and Jihad – the coalition currently fighting against Israel in Jenin – is a message: the war will resume when Hamas can do so.
The unregulated division between Ramallah and Gaza was also evident in the way Ramallah welcomed the liberated Palestinians. The modest flags in Ramallah were those of Fatah and the Democratic Front.
Palestinian security confiscated Hamas flags that were in the hands of Hamas supporters. The Popular Front has disappeared – both in Gaza and in Ramallah. So, Hamas and Jihad control the state of Gaza. Fatah and the Democratic Front control the state of Ramallah.
Ramallah is already working among donor countries to ensure that they do not provide any aid to Hamas. Because despite all the antics, Hamas does not represent the Palestinian people, and aid must only pass through the channels of the PA, the only legitimate entity of the Palestinian people.
The donor countries accept this. Without any representation for the legitimate Palestinian cause, no one will invest in Hamas’ puppet state. In other words: Gaza will remain in ruins for a long time to come.
Despite the messages from Hamas, which tries to present itself as the government of Gaza, when you step out of the focus of Al Jazeera’s cameras, even the Gazans themselves are not part of it. The mayor of Rafah said that everything is destroyed, and that the residents of Rafah have nowhere to return.
What concerns Gazans today is finding their loved ones under the rubble of their homes. If we compare what is happening in Gaza to the processes that have taken place in Syria, the Syrians have understood that it is the entire culture of muqawma of the Bashar Assad regime that brought the great disaster upon the Syrians.
Ramallah is working to ensure that donor countries do not provide aid to Hamas, which, despite its antics, does not represent the Palestinian people. Without representation for the legitimate Palestinian entity, no one will invest in Hamas’s puppet state, and Gaza will be left in ruins.
It seems that similar processes will occur in Gaza, especially if it becomes clear to them that the culture of muqawma that Hamas insists on adhering to will deepen their disaster further.
Two months ago, then-President-Elect Donald Trump, with his special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff by his side, reiterated: “If those hostages aren’t back … by the time I get into office, all hell will break out in the Middle East.” His often-repeated statement gave hope to all seeking the release of the 98 Israeli hostages (including three with dual American citizenship) in Hamas captivity in Gaza since October 7, 2023.
It seemed President Trump wished to repeat the scene of the 52 Americans who were abducted by supporters of the Iranian Revolution on November 4, 1979, and released on Ronald Reagan’s inauguration day on January 20, 1981, though without publicly acknowledged blackmail payments. So, on January 5, 2025, he sent his long time friend and real estate developer Steve Witkoff to kick-start the stalled negotiations with Hamas in Doha, Qatar, alongside the Biden administration team.
On January 17, the Israeli government was pressured to sign a bad, complicated, and illogical ceasefire agreement, that was inconsistent with the philosophy of the new Trump administration. An extra bit of irony is that the “all hell” threat was supposed to be directed to Hamas, Qatar, and Iran, but not to Israel.
The deal includes three phases of ceasefire (the first 2 phases to last 42 days each). The first phase will see 33 hostages, including “women, children, elderly men, and individuals with critical medical needs”, released by Hamas. On Sunday, January 19, only two of the three American captives of Hamas were released. In return, Israel released hundreds of Hamas terrorists. The agreement also allowed 600 trucks with humanitarian aid to enter Gaza daily, under Hamas control.
Three weeks into the ceasefire, Israeli forces will be required to limit their presence to only key routes, and displaced northern Gazans will be allowed to return, with vehicle inspection taking place under “Qatari Egyptian supervision“, instead of trustworthy Israeli supervision.
On day 22, the IDF will withdraw from the Netzarim corridor (which cuts Gaza in half) to a buffer zone 500 meters wide along the border with Israel. In total, some 30 Hamas terrorists will be released for each returned Israeli hostage, for a total of 3,000 Hamas terrorists. Senior terrorists will be deported to Qatar and Turkey, but the vast majority will be deported to Judea and Samaria, in the heart of Israel. America and Egypt will guarantee the deal. (See more details here)
Historically, about 80% of released terrorists return to terrorism. Israel’s domestic security force, Shin Bet, has said that 60% return to terror financing and 20% return to direct physical terror. Thus, at least 600 of the freed terrorists will continue their efforts to kill as many Israelis, including Americans, as they can. This deal guarantees a forever war with Gaza and radical Islam (Hamas) instead of a victory for Israel.
Why was Israel forced to accept such a bad deal when a much better deal could have been negotiated one month later, aided by the threat of force? Why did America push Israel to accept a deal that is so unfavorable to America’s long-term interests? Why did America push for a deal designed by the failed Biden administration, which was also favorable to radical Muslim Brotherhood countries such as Qatar and Turkey? What mistakes were made by the American negotiators, particularly by Steve Witkoff?
Save The West can only guess:
1) Witkoff was so eager to close a deal by January 19 to please his boss that he felt that he had to pressure US ally Israel rather than the unrelenting radical Islamic US enemy Hamas and its financial supporters, Qatar and Iran.
2) Witkoff did not properly consider the ramifications of the deal to US long-term foreign policy.
3) The full Trump national security team was focused on confirmation hearings in the Senate and could not focus adequately on this issue.
4) The staff surrounding Trump wanted to please his determination to “end the war”. Moreover, they didn’t have the courage to question the mistakes of his overzealous negotiator.
5) The happy prospects of facilitating the joyous release of these hostages very early in President Trump’s new term clouded the vision of his staff, who worked so hard to get him re-elected.
6) Witkoff had close financial dealings with Qatar and clearly overlooked Qatar’s financing of the global Muslim Brotherhood, which spreads anti-Christian and antisemitic propaganda through the al Jazeera propaganda TV outlet.
7) Having no real knowledge of the Middle East, but with financial links to Qatar, Witkoff did not understand that this deal re-invigorates the radical Islamic enemies of America (Iran and its proxies, as well as its proxies, Qatar and Turkey) in their quest to take over the Middle East and then the World.
8) Witkoff was apparently unaware that he was not ending the Israel war with Hamas/Iran, but turning it into an endless war, in violation of the Trump Doctrine to end “forever wars”.
9) Witkoff also abandoned the Trump Doctrine of “peace through strength”. Instead, he adopted the Democrat notion of peace through appeasement, which always leads to war.
10) Witkoff abandoned the Trump Doctrine of “America First.” Instead, he opted for Biden-Democratic policy of choosing Qatar and Hamas First. But the majority of Americans voted out the disgraced Democrat Pro-Communists/Islamists and their false narratives.
11) Witkoff ignored the Trump doctrine of “winning so often, that we will get tired of winning.”
12) Witkoff ignored the Trump doctrine of not overpaying for hostages.
13) Witkoff impaired the future success of the potential Abraham Accords expansion by appearing so weak and abandoning America’s only true ally in the Middle East.
14) WitKoff is facilitating the return of Gaza to Hamas, thereby forcing the residents of Gaza to live forever under the brutal rule of the Hamas Muslim Brotherhood Death Cult, instead of gaining some semblance of freedom under Israeli rule or, perhaps, the rule of Saudi Arabia and/or the UAE. We guess that the silent majority of American Muslim voters will be very disappointed by the prospect of such ongoing cruelty against their brethren.
So, how can the new Trump Administration recover from this major strategic blunder after the limited positive short-term glow of the hostage release fades? This hostage fiasco will cause allies to distrust the new Administration and enemies to not fear it.
1) Fire Steve Witkoff immediately, to set an example for future diplomats who ignore the noble aspects of the America First Trump Doctrine.
2) Review the vetting process to find out why Witkoff’s conflict of interest with Qatar was not detected. And why was he granted a National Security clearance?
3) Appoint a senior leader for a new Department of Policy Co-ordination (DOPC) so that rogue and incompetent appointees cannot subvert the Trump Doctrine.
4) Immediately purge all national security appointees who have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood (Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan) or Iran and its domestic sympathizers.
The new highly competent National Security team will now have lots of extra work to do to re-establish American national security credibility and the Trump Doctrine of America First. Let’s make America Great and Powerful Again!
The definition of nausea is “a feeling of sickness with an inclination to vomit.”
Subsequent frantic attempts by politicians and officials to justify this “deal” and idiotic pronouncements by the international community have been enough to induce a mass case of queasiness.
It must be stated at the outset that the return of the hostages is of the highest priority. This includes not only the living and the dead but also the bodies of soldiers and civilians who were kidnapped several years ago and cruelly held in the hell of Gaza. No justification whatsoever can be made for the sort of terrorist blackmail now being enacted.
Anything short of the return of every single illegally taken Israeli should be completely unacceptable. The very notion that terrorist murderers and rapists are able to control a drip-feed release of hostages is obscene. We now face a scandalous situation whereby Hamas and its allies can turn the screws resulting in anguished families wondering when they will ever see still-held loved ones.
The fact that the release of the hostages is being shlepped out means that at any stage, blackmail tactics will be employed to squeeze yet more disgusting concessions. Hamas knows only too well that all they have to do is to blame Israel for something and the international community will ride to their rescue as they have done in the past. Hypocrisy and appeasement are now the default positions of most of the UN and political leaders in democratic countries.
There is yet another nauseous component to this doubtful deal.
In exchange for the release of dead and living hostages kidnapped by Hamas and its terror associates Israel is releasing thousands of convicted terrorists from jail. These individuals have blood on their hands which means they are guilty of murdering Israeli civilians as well as IDF soldiers. Their victims were intentionally rammed with vehicles, stabbed, raped and otherwise brutally assaulted. Those murdered included the young and elderly, husbands and wives, brothers and sisters and small children and even babies.
These murderers never showed any sort of remorse. On the contrary, they remain proud of their actions. Instead, they are hailed as heroes by their respective terror patrons and lauded by the PLO and an Arab Palestinian Authority touted by the international community as peace partners.
It is these despicable specimens of humanity who are now being released and returned to their families. They are welcomed back to PA-controlled territory as conquering champions of the evil Zionist regime. Even worse, hundreds are being released into Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. One must question this act of reckless lunacy and wonder at the complete lack of backbone and self-respect that sanctioned its implementation.
This scandalous situation is made even worse when you consider the devastating effect this flood of released murderers has on the families who have lost dear ones. Put yourselves in the shoes of the widows, widowers, orphans and bereaved families. They are getting a knock on the door and the representatives of the IDF or Government inform them that the killer of their family has been released.
Making the situation even more excruciating is the fact that TV and social media are showing these murderers being feted and welcomed back into their homes. Scenes of jubilation for murdering Israelis are rubbing salt into raw wounds.
Without any doubt these released terrorists will soon be back plotting and carrying out yet more murders. That is what happened after the release of terrorists in the Shalit deal and it is 100 per cent a certainty after this current release. In effect, the murder of more Israelis is guaranteed, all enabled by those facilitating this latest charade.
How do we know that murder and mayhem will follow?
The terror facilitators have already proclaimed their future intentions.
A senior Hamas official: “the destruction of Israel remains our primary objective.”
Hamas thanks Turkey, South Africa, Algeria, Russia, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Belgium, Spain and Ireland for their support.
The Ramallah-based Arab Palestinian kleptocracy defended, glorified and celebrated 7 October. Just in case their message was not clear enough they followed this up by slandering and smearing Israel once again: “Palestinian prisoners are held in Israeli camps which are worse than Hitler’s fascist holocaust furnaces.”
The common theme emanating from all these terror-supporting quarters is that the cease-fire is a resounding victory and merely a temporary pause in the ultimate goal of destroying Israel.
Unsurprisingly, despite this explicit message, the world’s media prefers to ignore the clear agenda and instead engages in spreading tendentious reports about the evil Israelis. Convicted murderers are lauded as innocent victims of Zionist oppression and elevated to equal status with kidnapped hostages.
As though this is not bad enough, we are forced to read, listen to and endure the most nonsensical pontifications by political officials.
According to these misinformed, uninformed and clueless individuals, peace and tolerance are about to dawn.
Despite Hamas terrorists now emerging from yet-to-be-destroyed tunnels beneath mosques, schools, clinics, hospitals and homes and the discovery of yet more weapons and rockets, the genetic hallucinatory “experts” are already proclaiming “peace in our time.”
Despite clear evidence to the contrary, Israel is being warned that unless it agrees to the creation of yet another terror state in its Biblical heartland, it will be forever branded as a threat to world peace.
The likes of Albanese, Wong and New Zealand’s Foreign Minister, Winston Peters, join the rest of the UN in burbling the most inane nonsense. A common theme is that there must now be “a massive, rapid, unimpeded flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza.” Ignored is the stark fact that whatever aid has been and will be sent to Gaza is immediately hijacked by Hamas for its own purposes. Any deprivation suffered by locals is entirely the fault of the terror groups in charge.
Choosing to ignore this reality, befuddled politicians prefer to blame Israel and spout a myopic message of unreality.
Take this pearl from the NZ Foreign Minister: “to achieve a durable and lasting peace, we call on the parties to take meaningful steps towards a two state solution. Political will is the key to ensuring history does not repeat itself.”
Given the irrefutable stated aims of the terror groups involved and the articulated objectives of their patron, Iran, how can anyone in their right mind believe that the history of terror will not repeat itself?
It is glaringly obvious that for history NOT to be repeated, Israel must decisively put an end to the nefarious designs of its enemies.
PM Netanyahu must resign if he reaffirms his “doormat” status by withdrawing from Lebanon
Dr. Aaron Lerner 23 January 2025
We face many critical issues for our future, and if President Trump thinks that our leader is a “doormat,” we are doomed.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a one-time opportunity to change his “doormat” status in President Trump’s eyes.
We all understand that we must keep IDF forces in Lebanon. This is not a political issue in Israel at all.
According to media reports, instead of informing the Trump administration that we are staying in Lebanon, we asked for permission from the Trump administration to remain there, and they objected. It was a mistake to ask for permission instead of declaring our intent, but that is behind us now.
When we caved into Trump’s envoy and accepted the terms of the agreement with Hamas, Trump labeled Netanyahu as a “doormat.”
It is critical to change the designation of “doormat” for our prime minister by Mr. Trump, because a country whose leader is considered a “doormat” will not win Trump’s support on Gaza, Iran, or any other critical issue.
Therefore, with great regret, if we withdraw from Lebanon in the coming days, for the sake of us all, Netanyahu must resign in a process that immediately installs a replacement who will act decisively (e.g., annexation?) to signal to Trump that he is not a “doormat.”
To be clear: I am not looking for an excuse to remove Netanyahu. With all my heart, I want him to do the right thing, so he can continue to lead.
But if Mr. Netanyahu has resigned himself to being President Trump’s “doormat,” he must resign.
Czech
French
German
Hebrew
Noruegan
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Polish
Portuguese
