Diversity Guidelines by Society of Professional Journalists for journalists when writing about Muslims….

On October 6, 2001 at its National Convention in Seattle, the Society of Professional Journalists passed a resolution urging members and fellow journalists to take steps against racial profiling in their coverage of the war on terrorism and to reaffirm their commitment to:

— Use language that is informative and not inflammatory;

— Portray Muslims, Arabs and Middle Eastern and South Asian Americans in the richness of their diverse experiences;

— Seek truth through a variety of voices and perspectives that help audiences understand the complexities of the events in Pennsylvania, New York City and Washington, D.C.

Guidelines

Visual images

— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing Americans mourning those lost in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing rescue and other public service workers and military personnel.

— Do not represent Arab Americans and Muslims as monolithic groups. Avoid conveying the impression that all Arab Americans and Muslims wear traditional clothing.

— Use photos and features to demystify veils, turbans and other cultural articles and customs.

Stories

— Seek out and include Arabs and Arab Americans, Muslims, South Asians and men and women of Middle Eastern descent in all stories about the war, not just those about Arab and Muslim communities or racial profiling.

— Cover the victims of harassment, murder and other hate crimes as thoroughly as you cover the victims of overt terrorist attacks.

— Make an extra effort to include olive-complexioned and darker men and women, Sikhs, Muslims and devout religious people of all types in arts, business, society columns and all other news and feature coverage, not just stories about the crisis.

— Seek out experts on military strategies, public safety, diplomacy, economics and other pertinent topics who run the spectrum of race, class, gender and geography.

— When writing about terrorism, remember to include white supremacist, radical anti-abortionists and other groups with a history of such activity.

— Do not imply that kneeling on the floor praying, listening to Arabic music or reciting from the Quran are peculiar activities.

— When describing Islam, keep in mind there are large populations of Muslims around the world, including in Africa, Asia, Canada, Europe, India and the United States. Distinguish between various Muslim states; do not lump them together as in constructions such as “the fury of the Muslim world.”

— Avoid using word combinations such as “Islamic terrorist” or “Muslim extremist” that are misleading because they link whole religions to criminal activity. Be specific: Alternate choices, depending on context, include “Al Qaeda terrorists” or, to describe the broad range of groups involved in Islamic politics, “political Islamists.” Do not use religious characterizations as shorthand when geographic, political, socioeconomic or other distinctions might be more accurate.

— Avoid using terms such as “jihad” unless you are certain of their precise meaning and include the context when they are used in quotations. The basic meaning of “jihad” is to exert oneself for the good of Islam and to better oneself.

— Consult the Library of Congress guide for transliteration of Arabic names and Muslim or Arab words to the Roman alphabet. Use spellings preferred by the American Muslim Council, including “Muhammad,” “Quran,” and “Makkah,” not “Mecca.”

— Regularly seek out a variety of perspectives for your opinion pieces. Check your coverage against the five Maynard Institute for Journalism Education fault lines of race and ethnicity, class, geography, gender and generation.

— Ask men and women from within targeted communities to review your coverage and make suggestions.

Source:

http://www.spj.org/divguidelines.asp

UN: A ‘Humanitarian Move’: Israel’s Decision to Release Terrorists;

The recent Israeli decision to release Hezbollah and Lebanese terrorists in a prisoner exchange was hailed yesterday by the United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon as a “humanitarian move.”

“The Secretary-General welcomes the progress on the urgent humanitarian aspects of Security Council Resolution 1701 achieved by the recent decision of the Israeli government,” commented a senior official at the U.N. “These involve the return of the two abducted Israeli soldiers and the solution of the cases of Lebanese prisoners held in Israel. He looks forward to the signing and the full implementation of the negotiated agreement in the near future.”

The senior U.N. official added that “He hopes that the envisaged humanitarian moves will encourage further steps on implementing other parts of the resolution and contribute to further humanitarian moves.” Israeli reservists Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser were abducted in a cross-border raid in July 2006 carried out by Hezbollah, a Lebanese terrorist organization.

The unprovoked attack also killed eight other Israeli troops and sparked the Second Lebanon War. Security Council Resolution 1701 called for a cease-fire between Israel and Hezbollah, as well as “the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers, that have given rise to the current crisis.”.”

In response to a question of the status of the reservists, as to whether they were alive of dead, the U.N. official said that their status is unknown.

In a related move, The Bulletin asked how there could be considered progress on the ‘urgent humanitarian aspects of Security Council Resolution 1701’ if the abducted soldiers were not even confirmed to be alive. She responded, “We just don’t know what the status of the soldier is. Israel thought that they should release the Lebanese combatants, and the Secretary- -General welcomes the exchange.”

The Bulletin also spoke to a high-ranking official U.N. off the record for an opinion of how the release of combatants of a terrorist organization such as Hezbollah could be considered “humanitarian.”

The answer: “Israel occupied Lebanese territory. Hezbollah could be seen as resisting those that were invading a member state.”

When pointed out that Israel invaded Lebanon only after Hezbollah attacked Israel without provocation, abducted two Israeli soldiers and launched Kaytusha rockets on Israeli cities, the U.N. official responded by saying that she didn’t want to argue this point.

She said, “All I was saying was that there are two sides to every story. Hezbollah was resisting invasion. Israel went in, took combatants, and left. The Security Council condemned the war. Looking at the combatants as resistance fighters, it was a humanitarian action to return them.”

Sam Harari can be reached at harari@thebulletin.us.

This piece ran in the Bulletin in Philadelphia on July 1st, 2008

“Bodies for Terrorists” Exchange Deal Sacrifices Safety Of Israeli Lives For A Better International Image

One of the mysteries of this accord, from Israel’s point of view, revolved around an Israeli policy which openly placed Israeli lives in danger – for two reasons.

The first is that Samir Kantar will now be poised to lead and conduct terror activity, as he remains unrepentant for his actions, 29 years later.

The second reason is that Mr. Kantar’s release in exchange for murdered Israeli soldiers carries a message, which is that Palestinian terrorists need not fear any Israeli incrimination if they murder an Israeli POW – the price exacted from Israel will be the same.

Yet the above Bulletin interview with a senior U.N. official demonstrates that there is at least one entity that is ready to praise Israel for trading a live terrorist for two murdered Israeli POWs.

That entity is the U.N. Israel has now achieved the highest possible praise at the U.N., with international admiration lavished upon Israel for freeing a terrorist convicted of a most heinous act of first degree murder. The current Israeli government seems to pursue a better image in the international arena of public relations, even though the risks are obvious.

Envoy Of Israel Prime Minister Off To Israel For POW Release

Jerusalem – Ofer Dekel, appointed by the prime minister to conduct talks for the release of the kidnapped soldiers, left on Thursday for Egypt in order to resume the talks for the release of the Israeli POW, Gilad Shalit. He is expected to meet with Omar Suleiman, the director of Egyptian intelligence.

Last Tuesday, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert visited Sharm el-Sheikh, where he met with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. The Egyptian president promised Mr. Olmert that “Egypt is putting great effort into the release of Gilad Shalit.” Mr. Olmert asked Mr Mubarak to do everything he could to pressure Hamas into completing the deal, and the Egyptian president promised that his country would not open the Rafah crossing point until Staff Sgt. Shalit was released.

Israel Radio reported that over the next several days, a round of separate meetings is due to take place in Cairo between Israeli representatives and Hamas representatives with Egyptian officials in order to promote the deal.

Mitzpe Hila, Stff Sgt. Shalit’s home community, observed the second anniversary of his capture by Hamas with a rally, where Mr. Hen Arad, the brother of the captive MIA Israeli navigator Ron Arad, sharply criticized the behavior of the Israeli governments regarding MIAs throughout the years. Hen concluded his remarks as follows: “Our decision-makers treat the soldiers whom they sent like the last of the Caesars. Ron volunteered to fly not in order to be a gladiator, and Gilad did not join the Armored Corps in order to be a shahid [The Arabic term for “martyr”.. Dear Shalit family: don’t give up. Don’t let them sacrifice Gilad. It seems that our leaders hold nothing sacred.”

Staff Sgt. Shalit’s parents, Mr. and Mrs. Aviva and Noam Shalit shook the hands of those who attended the rally, including Shlomo and Miki Goldwasser and Zvi Regev, parents of the MIAs from the northern border, who expressed hope that the deal for their sons’ release would also bear fruit. Mr. and Mrs. Yaakov and Tzipora Avitan, the parents of the late Adi Avitan, who was kidnapped and murdered by Hezbollah eight years ago, were also in attendance.

Mrs. Shalit held a water bottle in her hand, with her head drooped for much of the rally.

When she was about to ascend the speakers’ platform, she felt ill and asked her husband, Noam, to read what she had prepared.

“I want to thank, with all my heart, the family, the friends and all the citizens of Israel for their support and solidarity, for the help, the love and the warm embrace that we have received over these past two years,” Noam said on her behalf.

“Who would have believed that 731 days have passed and Gilad is still in a dank, dark pit, completely isolated? Who would have believed that 731 days have passed, and the prime minister, who has taken this matter under his full responsibility, has not reached an agreement to bring Gilad home? Gilad pays, and continues to pay, a price too heavy to bear, but when the government needs to fulfill its supreme moral obligation to a soldier, nothing here is taken for granted anymore. I call upon the prime minister: Release my son Gilad from this terrible captivity. Fulfill your obligation to the soldiers of the IDF!”

And then, at Mrs. Shalit’s request, all those in attendance closed their eyes for 30 seconds and stood in silence, imagining what Gilad goes through every single day of his captivity in Gaza.

David Barak, father of the late Lt. Hanan Barak, Gilad’s tank commander who was killed during the kidnapping, demanded that the politicians stop their chatter and act. “We don’t leave the wounded in the field no matter what the situation,” he said.

Vilnai: Crossing Points To Gaza To Stay Closed

“Israel will close all the crossing points along the Gaza Strip on Thursday again,” was the decision made Wednesday night in a meeting that took place in the office of Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai with IDF and GSS directors.

It appears that on Friday, there will be a partial opening of the crossing points for the entry of humanitarian cases through the Erez crossing. All the crossing points in the Gaza Strip were closed after Islamic Jihad fired three Kassam missiles at Sderot on Wednesday, violating the truce with Hamas.

One of the missiles that was fired at Sderot Wednesday night landed in the backyard of a city residence, the second in the city’s industrial zone and the third in an uninhabited area outside the city. Two people were lightly wounded by shrapnel, and one person suffered from shock. The wounded people were taken to Barzilai Hospital in Ashkelon for medical treatment.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com. His Web site is www.IsraelBehindTheNews.com

©The Bulletin 2008

In Sderot – Remembering Tibet, Instead of Watching the Olympics in Beijing

It would be the easiest thing in the world to relax, sit back and watch the Beijing Olympics on my porch in Sderot.

Yet it is hard to forget flashbacks from exactly three years ago, when I traveled through Tibet- an enchanted nation with the highest altitude in the world that lives under the iron fist of the Beijing government.

I was exposed to Tibet, for the first time, while visiting Nepal, during a three week trek around the Annapurna Himalayan mountains, when our guide screened the movie: ” 7 years in Tibet’- starring Brad Pit. That film depicted the Chinese oppressive policies in of Tibet, including the brutal expulsion of the Dahli Lamah and his peaceful people of Tibet to Northern India. When I took a walk outside of that small movie hall I was overwhelmed of the same exact enormous mountain views of the movie- only from the other side- I then decided to travel to Tibet.

The dirt road from Nepal to Tibet- a 5 day jeep ride journey to Lasah the Tibetan capital, was packed all the way with laborors, Men, woman and Children, constructing Chinese paved roads in the highest altitudes in the world.

I traveled in Tibet for one month, and I felt the experience for the first time in my life the meaning of not being free, as people as a nation, not being able to worship your own g-d and belief. The Tibetans are prohibited to posses any picture or portrait of the Dahli Lamah or sculpture who is considered as a divine figure to them. While stopping through the villages in Tibet on the way to Lasah, our group, hailing from different parts of the world- gave out small pictures of the Dalhi Lamh. (That we photocopied from the “lonely plant’ guide book.) to the villagers. It is hard to forget witnessing a 70 year old woman, seeing, a photo of the Dalhi Lamah for the first time in 50 years. We watched, her excitement, while tears started to rush through her face…

Sneaking in to the ‘Potalah’, the temple of the Dalhi Lamah, after refusing to pay an expensive entrance fee for the Chinese government- we noticed a Tibetan man and a Tibetan woman constructing the roof, having a special ceremony and dance, while fixing up a holy place. All the while a huge Chinese flag waved in their background- Just in case they forget who’s in charge.

Passing through the country, we noticed how every single thing you want to do, see or experience any ritual, or Tibetan tradition- is transformed into a fee to the Chinese government. For any monastery, any trek or lake- you have to go through a travel agency, and the most expensive tourist attraction is to ride towards Mount Everest base camp, paying an expensive fee, having paved roads towards the mountain-

It’s seems like the Chinese turned Tibet into their Amusement park, charging for every single ride…

Walking around Lasah, getting friendly with the local Tibetans, that came a 6 day walk from different parts of Tibet, helping a Lamah devotee and his delegation, to send a ‘fax’.

Meeting a Tibetan History teacher, reveling to me that 90% of the Tibetan History was destroyed by the Chinese, and that in Lasah they only teach Chinese. “There are only 4 history teachers left in Tibet ” the teacher explained.

Arriving by coincidence to the village ‘Tabu’- in the ‘Spitty valley’- where I’ve witnessed a Tibetan Festival that occurs once in 7 years, being celebrated in India,

The importance of a homeland, where one can feel free and safe to celebrate traditional and beliefs, that have been celebrated for thousands of years.

Sitting in Sderot, writing and remembering these experiences from Tibet and India, appreciating the fact that we Jews live freely in our own land, thinking of the past few months, where I live, where more than 600 rockets, missiles and mortars have been launched Yes, unlike the people in Tibet, we live in our homeland. We are free. Yet where we live in Sderot we would like to sit back and relax and watch the Olympics, yet it is hard to relax, knowing our reality in f Sderot, where our freedom is being challenged.

It is equally hard to forget the reality of Tibet, where it is impossible for Tibetans to relax, because they cannot live in freedom under Chinese rule..

Hamas Fires Missiles, Violates Cease-Fire Daily

Jerusalem – Yesterday morning, a Hamas spokesman released a letter to the Israeli media saying that Hamas would not act against anyone who fires missiles into Israel. It said that “Israel can forget about its dream of Palestinians interfering with Palestinian resistance.”

In essence, less than a week into the latest cease-fire, the Palestinians have renewed daily mortar and missile strikes into Israel, thus violating the cease-fire.

On Tuesday, at least three Kassam-class missiles fired from the Gaza Strip rammed into the southern Israel city of Sderot. One of the missiles landed near a home and several people were hospitalized for shock. The Islamic Jihad accepted responsibility for the missile strike.

Israeli officials said their military would not respond to the Palestinian missile salvo.

Effie Cohen, whose home suffered a direct hit in Sderot, stood in the shambles of his kitchen that was destroyed on Tuesday in Sderot, where he shook his head with disgust and declared that he had no faith in the government of Israel.

This was the second Palestinian attack in two days from the Gaza Strip. On Monday, Palestinian gunners fired a mortar shell into Israel. “The prime minister has warned that the cease-fire could be short and fragile,” the office of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said in a statement after the Kassam strike.

US Sees Hezollah Operate In Venezuela

The Middle East Newsline has confirmed that the United States has determined that the Iranian-sponsored Hezbollah was operating in Venezuela.

The Bush administration said the government in Venezuela was cooperating with Hezbollah. Officials said the government was also relaying funds to Hezbollah.

“It is extremely troubling to see the government of Venezuela employing and providing safe harbor to Hezbollah facilitators and fundraisers,” said Adam Szubin, the director of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.

On June 18, the Treasury Department sanctioned a Venezuelan diplomat identified as a financier of Hezbollah in the South American state. The diplomat was identified as Ghazi Nasr Al Din, banned from doing business with Americans or in the United States.

The U.S. Treasury order also sanctioned Fawzi Kan’an and two Venezuelan-based travel agencies, Biblos and Hilal. Officials said Mr. Kan’an, who denied any link to Hezbollah, owns or controls these agencies.

Mr. Nasr Al Din was president of the Shi’a Islamic Center in Caracas and is suspected of laundering funds to Hezbollah. In 2006, he brought two representatives to Caracas to solicit donations. In 2005, Mr. Nasr Al Din paid for Hezbollah members to attend a training course in Iran.

“Nasr Al Din has counseled Hezbollah donors on fundraising efforts and has provided donors with specific information on bank accounts where the donors’ deposits would go directly to Hezbollah,” the treasury official said.

Mr. Kan’an was described as another financier of Hezbollah and traveled with militia representatives to Iran. The treasury official said Mr. Kan’an used Biblos to funnel money to Lebanon.

“Kan’an has met with senior Hezbollah officials in Lebanon to discuss operational issues, including possible kidnappings and terrorist attacks,” the treasury official said. “Further, Kan’an has also traveled with other Hezbollah members to Iran for training.”

“They want to kill as many people as they can, they want it to be a big splash,” former CIA intelligence officer Bob Baer said. “They cannot have an operation fail, and I don’t think they will. They’re the A-team of terrorism.”

At the same time, the Bush administration has been examining a Lebanese request for a $400 million arms deal. Under the project, the United States would relay hundreds of anti-tank guided missiles, light weapons and military equipment to the Lebanese army, which in May refused to stop the Hezbollah offensive throughout the country.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com. His Web site is www.IsraelBehindTheNews.com

©The Bulletin 2008

The World Should Know What He [KUNTAR] Did to My Family

Abu Abbas, the former head of a Palestinian terrorist group who was captured in Iraq on April 15, is infamous for masterminding the 1985 hijacking of the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro. But there are probably few who remember why Abbas’s terrorists held the ship and its 400-plus passengers hostage for two days. It was to gain the release of a Lebanese terrorist named Samir Kuntar, who is locked up in an Israeli prison for life. Kuntar’s name is all but unknown to the world. But I know it well. Because almost a quarter of a century ago, Kuntar murdered my family.

It was a murder of unimaginable cruelty, crueler even than the murder of Leon Klinghoffer, the American tourist who was shot on the Achille Lauro and dumped overboard in his wheelchair. Kuntar’s mission against my family, which never made world headlines, was also masterminded by Abu Abbas. And my wish now is that this terrorist leader should be prosecuted in the United States, so that the world may know of all his terrorist acts, not the least of which is what he did to my family on April 22, 1979.

It had been a peaceful Sabbath day. My husband, Danny, and I had picnicked with our little girls, Einat, 4, and Yael, 2, on the beach not far from our home in Nahariya, a city on the northern coast of Israel, about six miles south of the Lebanese border. Around midnight, we were asleep in our apartment when four terrorists, sent by Abu Abbas from Lebanon, landed in a rubber boat on the beach two blocks away. Gunfire and exploding grenades awakened us as the terrorists burst into our building. They had already murdered a police officer. As they charged up to the floor above ours, I opened the door to our apartment. In the moment before the hall light went off, they turned and saw me. As they moved on, our neighbor from the upper floor came running down the stairs. I grabbed her and pushed her inside our apartment and slammed the door.

Outside, we could hear the men storming about. Desperately, we sought to hide. Danny helped our neighbor climb into a crawl space above our bedroom I went in behind her with Yael in my arms. Then Danny grabbed Einat and was dashing out the front door to take refuge in an underground shelter when the terrorists came crashing into our flat. They held Danny and Einat while they searched for me and Yael, knowing there were more people in the apartment. I will never forget the joy and the hatred in their voices as they swaggered about hunting for us, firing their guns and throwing grenades. I knew that if Yael cried out, the terrorists would toss a grenade into the crawl space and we would be killed. So I kept my hand over her mouth, hoping she could breathe. As I lay there, I remembered my mother telling me how she had hidden from the Nazis during the Holocaust. “This is just like what happened to my mother,” I thought.

As police began to arrive, the terrorists took Danny and Einat down to the beach. There, according to eyewitnesses, one of them shot Danny in front of Einat so that his death would be the last sight she would ever see. Then he smashed my little girl’s skull in against a rock with his rifle butt. That terrorist was Samir Kuntar.

By the time we were rescued from the crawl space, hours later, Yael, too, was dead. In trying to save all our lives, I had smothered her.

The next day, Abu Abbas announced from Beirut that the terrorist attack in Nahariya had been carried out “to protest the signing of the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty” at Camp David the previous year. Abbas seems to have a gift for charming journalists, but imagine the character of a man who protests an act of peace by committing an act of slaughter.

Two of Abbas’s terrorists had been killed by police on the beach. The other two were captured, convicted and sentenced to life in prison. Despite my protests, one was released in a prisoner exchange for Israeli POWs several months before the Achille Lauro hijacking. Abu Abbas was determined to find a way to free Kuntar as well. So he engineered the hijacking of the Achille Lauro off the coast of Egypt and demanded the release of 50 Arab terrorists from Israeli jails. The only one of those prisoners actually named was Samir Kuntar. The plight of hundreds held hostage on a cruise ship for two days at sea lent itself to massive international media coverage. The attack on Nahariya, by contrast, had taken less than an hour in the middle of the night. So what happened then was hardly noticed outside of Israel.

One hears the terrorists and their excusers say that they are driven to kill out of desperation. But there is always a choice. Even when you have suffered, you can choose whether to kill and ruin another’s life, or whether to go on and rebuild. Even after my family was murdered, I never dreamed of taking revenge on any Arab. But I am determined that Samir Kuntar should never be released from prison. In 1984, I had to fight my own government not to release him as part of an exchange for several Israeli soldiers who were POWs in Lebanon. I understood, of course, that the families of those POWs would gladly have agreed to the release of an Arab terrorist to get their sons back. But I told Yitzhak Rabin, then defense minister, that the blood of my family was as red as that of the POWs. Israel had always taken a position of refusing to negotiate with terrorists. If they were going to make an exception, let it be for a terrorist who was not as cruel as Kuntar.

“Your job is not to be emotional,” I told Rabin, “but to act rationally.” And he did.

So Kuntar remains in prison. I have been shocked to learn that he has married an Israeli Arab woman who is an activist on behalf of terrorist prisoners. As the wife of a prisoner, she gets a monthly stipend from the government. I’m not too happy about that.

In recent years, Abu Abbas started telling journalists that he had renounced terrorism and that killing Leon Klinghoffer had been a mistake.

But he has never said that killing my family was a mistake. He was a terrorist once, and a terrorist, I believe, he remains. Why else did he spend these last years, as the Israeli press has reported, free as a bird in Baghdad, passing rewards of $25,000 from Saddam Hussein to families of Palestinian homicide bombers? More than words, that kind of cash prize, which is a fortune to poor families, was a way of urging more suicide bombers. The fortunate thing about Abbas’s attaching himself to Hussein is that it set him up for capture.

Some say that Italy should have first crack at Abbas. It had already convicted him of the Achille Lauro hijacking in absentia in 1986. Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi now wants Abbas handed over so that he can begin serving his life sentence. But it’s also true that in 1985, the Italians had Abbas in their hands after U.S. fighter jets forced his plane to land in Sicily. And yet they let him go. So while I trust Berlusconi, who knows if a future Italian government might not again wash its hands of Abbas?

In 1995, Rabin, then our prime minister, asked me to join him on his trip to the White House, where he was to sign a peace agreement with Yasser Arafat, which I supported. I believe that he wanted me to represent all Israeli victims of terrorism. Rabin dreaded shaking hands with Arafat, knowing that those hands were bloody. At first, I agreed to make the trip, but at the last minute, I declined. As prime minister, Rabin had to shake hands with Arafat for political reasons. As a private person, I did not. So I stayed here.

Now I am ready and willing to come to the United States to testify against Abu Abbas if he is tried for terrorism. The daughters of Leon Klinghoffer have said they are ready to do the same. Unlike Klinghoffer, Danny, Einat and Yael were not American citizens. But Klinghoffer was killed on an Italian ship in Abbas’s attempt to free the killer of my family in Israel.

We are all connected by the international web of terrorism woven by Abbas. Let the truth come out in a new and public trial. And let it be in the United States, the leader in the struggle against terrorism.

————— Smadar Haran Kaiser is a social worker. She is remarried and has two daughters.

The Washington Post Sunday, May 18, 2003; Page B02 NAHARIYA, Israel
www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A274

Process To Determine Status Of Kidnapped Soldiers Begins

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) Chief Rabbi Brigadier-General Rabbi Avichai Ronski received all the information possessed by the security echelon and the Intelligence Branch regarding the status of the kidnapped soldiers: Sergeant 1st Class Ehud Goldwasser and Staff Sergeant Eldad Regev.

The IDF Chief Rabbi began the process at the end of which he will determine the status of the kidnapped soldiers.

The IDF Chief Rabbi is the expert Jewish religious official in this field and is expected to review the information transferred to him and consult with various religious officials before reaching a decision.

GOC Human Resources Major-General Eliezer Stern updated the families of the kidnapped soldiers about the process and promised to update them. Any new

information will be shared with them first, including any decisions that are

made.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com. His Web site is www.IsraelBehindTheNews.com

©The Bulletin 2008

Fatah Announces ‘Reconciliation Conference’ With Hamas

Jerusalem – The reliable Palestinian Ma’an news agency reports that a “national reconciliation conference” will shortly take place, aimed at bringing together the Fatah and the Hamas.

Ma’an reports that Simultaneous sessions, organized by the Popular Committee for National Reconciliation, will be held in Ramallah, Gaza, the Egyptian capital Cairo and the Qatari capital Doha.

The Secretary General of the Arab League, Amr Moussa, will attend the session in Ramallah and the Qatari Foreign Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem Al-Thani from Doha will also address the conference.

According to Ma’an, the initiative proposes a two-sided solution. “First is to call for the release of political prisoners on both sides and to agree on a program to work towards interim presidential and legislative elections. Second is to address security and the political system, in addition to reviving the Palestine Liberation Organization.”

In that context, Hamas terrorists now sitting in Palestinian Authority jails are to be freed this week, despite pledges of Machmud Abbas to Israel and the U.S. government

The Palestinian Authority has in recent days released at least three Hamas convicts, each of whom were found guilty of attempting to murder Israelis.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com. His Web site is www.IsraelBehindTheNews.com

©The Bulletin 2008

Young Israel Protests French President Nicolas Sarkozy

National Council of Young Israel President Shlomo Z. Mostofsky, Esq., made the following statement today in response to French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s comments during his trip to Israel, in which he called on Israel to stop constructing new homes and to expel the Jews from Judea and Samaria, and said that “[t]here cannot be peace without recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of two states:”

“The National Council of Young Israel is outraged at the insensitivity that President Sarkozy displayed during his current visit to Israel. At the same time that he was addressing the Knesset and declaring that France was a friend of Israel, President Sarkozy had the audacity to call on Israel to take steps that would inevitably jeopardize the safety and security of its citizens. Just as the Israeli Prime Minister would not call on France to relinquish half of Paris to its enemy, or even to a friend for that matter, President Sarkozy has no standing and no right to call on Israel to cede control of its capital to people intent on destroying its citizenry. The French President has no business suggesting that Israel divide that which is indivisible. Israel can agree to a divided Jerusalem no more than General Charles de Gaulle and the French were able to agree to a divided France under the Nazis during Work War II. The position of the National Council of Young Israel continues to be that there can be no division of Jerusalem at any time, under any circumstances.

The National Council of Young Israel is also appalled that President Sarkozy chose to advocate the expulsion of Jews from their homes in Judea and Samaria. As we saw from the Israeli government’s failed experiment with Gush Katif, forcing Jews from their homes and relinquishing the land to the Palestinians does not lead to peace. President Sarkozy may think that he has all the answers to the current situation in Israel, but until he stops looking at things through the eyes of the Palestinians and develops a true understanding of the nature of the conflict and the need for Israel to defend itself, he should refrain from making suggestions and advocating positions that threaten the future of the Jewish state.”