SWC Calls for UNRWA to be Replaced with Alternative Agency in Response to UN Findings of UNRWA Complicity in October 7th Attacks

In response to findings of the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) that 9 UNRWA employees were involved in the crimes of the October 7th attacks on Israel which resulted in the deaths of more than 1,100 Israelis, the Simon Wiesenthal Center has reiterated its call for the closure of UNRWA and the creation of a new agency to provide for the humanitarian and educational needs of the Palestinian people, free from complicity in anti-Semitic activity.

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, SWC Associate Dean, and Global Social Action Director stated, “Now, the UN’s own Inspector General has acknowledged what Israel and others have long known, that UNRWA’s own staff participated in the October 7th attacks on Israel.  It is long overdue that the 60+ countries that finance UNRWA defund this agency that actively foments anti-Semitic hate and violence and replace it with a new agency that can address the educational and humanitarian needs of the Palestinian people without the hate.”

Rabbi Cooper noted that OIOS only investigated nineteen UNRWA staff members, and still found 9 as having participated in the crimes of October 7th; a rate of 47%. “There is credible evidence that the moral rot of UNRWA extends to hundreds of other employees, as well as its deeply anti-Semitic and inciteful educational content.  We call on those countries that still finance UNRWA to take a hard look at its toxic culture and pursue alternative vehicles for Palestinian humanitarian assistance.”


For further information, please email Michele Alkin, Director of Global Communications at malkin@wiesenthal.com or Erik Simon at esimon@wiesenthal.com, join the Center on Facebook, or follow @simonwiesenthal for news updates sent directly to your Twitter feed. 

The Simon Wiesenthal Center is an international Jewish human rights organization. It holds consultative status at the United Nations, UNESCO, the OSCE, the Council of Europe, the OAS, and the Latin American Parliament (PARLATINO).   

Israel UN forced to fire 9 employees over likely involvement in Hamas massacre: ‘Tip of the iceberg’

JERUSALEM — The United Nations said on Monday that nine employees from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) likely participated in the Hamas slaughter of 1,200 people, including more than 30 Americans, on Oct. 7 in southern Israel.

“For nine people, the evidence was sufficient to conclude that they may have been involved in the 7th of October attacks,” Farhan Haq, spokesperson for the U.N. secretary general said during a press briefing.

The U.N. announced that the world body will sever its employment from UNRWA, an agency that supports the relief and human development of Palestinian refugees.

In January, U.N. Secretary General António Guterres tasked the U.N.’s investigative arm, the Office of Internal Oversight Services, to investigate allegations that UNRWA staff took part in the Oct. 7 massacre.

Reuters reported that 19 staff members were investigated, but apart from the nine dismissed, the other cases lacked evidence to support their involvement.

The head of UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini, wrote in a statement posted on the agency’s website that “I have decided that in the case of these remaining nine staff members, they cannot work for UNRWA. All contracts of these staff members will be terminated in the interest of the Agency.”

The criticism of UNRWA’s criminal misconduct was swift. Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the associate dean of the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, told Fox News Digital, “Now is the time for major donor nations to UNRWA to end funding for this corrupted pro-Hamas anti-peace entity. UNRWA is part of the problem for Palestinians, not part of any peaceful solution.”

UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini
UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini

IDF spokesperson Nadav Shoshani criticized the agency on X, noting in part that “A UN investigation (yes, UN as in the first two letters of UNRWA) has concluded that 9 of your workers might have taken part in the raping, killing and slaughtering of Israelis and Israeli communities during the Oct. 7 massacre. Your ‘relief’ agency has officially stooped to a new level of low, and it is time that the world sees your true face.”

David Bedein, the director of the Center for Near East Policy Research in Jerusalem, told Fox News Digital the investigation was just “the tip of the iceberg.”

Bedein, who has published numerous reports on UNRWA’s curriculum that documented pro-terrorism and antisemitic teaching, added, “UNRWA is coming out of October 7 strengthened and there is no supervision and there is no demand from Israel and donor countries that there be inspections of UNRWA facilities for weapons.”

He said he recommended to the Israeli security establishment in September 2023 that there be “close supervision of UNRWA.”

Fox News Digital reported in late July that Israeli lawmakers approved the first reading of a bill that would cut ties with the controversial U.N. agency and declare it a terrorist entity. Speaking in the Knesset in July, Yulia Malinovsky, the bill’s sponsor, called UNRWA “a fifth column within the State of Israel” and said it was high time that the agency was outlawed in the country.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee also passed initial legislation that would build on an already existing funding freeze for the multimillion-dollar organization and direct the State Department to recover previously donated monies.

The U.S. suspended funding for UNRWA after Israeli allegations over its members taking part in the attack on Israel. However, many countries, including Germany, Austria, Japan and also the European Union have restarted their funding to the organization.

A State Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital that they had not yet reviewed the report’s findings.

Fox News’ Yonat Friling, Ruth Marks Eglash and Reuters contributed to this report.

Warding Off Eicha with Ayeka

Our custom is to read Parshat Devarim right before Tisha B’av. One of the reasons for this custom can be seen through the word “Eicha” which is used sparingly throughout the Tanach. The Book of Lamentations which is read on Tisha B’av begins with this word. “Eicha Yashva Badad”, how has she (i.e. Jerusalem) sat alone, and is thus known as Megillat Eicha. The first time this word is used in the Chumash is found in our Parsha (Devarim 1:12) as Moshe expresses doubt in his ability to lead the nation: “Eicha Esa L’vadi”, how can I bear the burden alone.

We continue this linguistic connection with our choice of HafTorah, Divrei Yeshayahua (Isaiah 1:21), where we meet up with this expression once again. We echo the words of the prophet, as in response to the rampant corruption of his time, Yesha’ayahu bitterly laments: “Eicha Hai’ta L’zona Kirya Ne’emana”, how has this loyal city become like a harlot.

Rav Soloveitchik (M’Pninei HaRav pg. 316) points out that this same word, albeit with a different pronunciation, can be found in the Torah in one previous location.

In Parshat Bereishit, after Adam and Eve had partaken from the tree of knowledge and hidden themselves in shame, the Almighty calls out saying: “Ayeka- where art thou?” (Bereishit 3:8).

The Rav made the following comment: If the hopeful call of Ayeka is not heeded, it then has the potential of becoming transformed into the bitter lamentation of Eicha.

The verse describes how G-d calls out to Adam as he walked in the garden “Leruach Hayom”, and the Midrash (Bereishit Rabba 19:6) discusses whether this takes place at sunrise or sunset. Demonstrating his homiletic prowess, the Rav explained that Ruach Ha’yom, the Zeitgeist surrounding us, can be interpreted as G-d calling out to man- Ayeka! This can take place at either sunrise or sunset, at a time of new beginnings and of hope, or else of failure and despair.

Towards the beginning of the Emancipation, as freedom was extended to all, liberalization was the call of the hour. It was as if a new light had begun to shine on Jewry. And yet, when G-d appeared to ask “Ayeka”, Jews hid from Him – after all, they were now emancipated. Later on, during the period of World War II, a bleak sunset of darkness and calamity, G-d’s cry to mankind was heard again: Ayeka – where art thou. Again, there was no response to G-d’s call, and in lieu of Ayeka the terrible ramifications of “Eicha” were experienced.

Wanting to give this Midrash an Eretz Yisrael spin, we might say the following:

On the eve of the 9th of Av as the spies instilled fear in the hearts of the People of Israel, they began to sob bitterly. Our Sages (Taanit 29a) say that the nation cried that night. The Almighty then had occasion to say, “You cry for naught; needlessly. The time will come when you will have a good reason to cry… (this will be as you witness) the destruction of the Temple”. Night and darkness befell the Jewish people then, just as it did in the 1930’s and 40’s. Did not the expulsion from Spain occur around the 9th of Av? Did not the first World War commence on this day? The Almighty was crying out to the Jewish People: “Ayeka- I am waiting for you in Eretz Yisrael”. Alas, most of the Jewish people were hiding in the Diaspora, refusing to leave.

Rav Teichtel in his “Eim Habanim Semaicha” perceived a direct link between the peoples’ refusal to leave to Eretz Yisrael and the imminent Holocaust. The Ayeka was tragically transformed into Eicha. Now, seventy years later, we are experiencing a period of sunrise as we bask in the light of Hashem’s Chesed. A younger generation has arisen in the Diaspora- a generation who knew not the trauma of the Holocaust. In our Parsha, Moshe stands before such a younger generation, far removed from their parents’ aversion to Eretz Yisrael. Moshe reminds them of the sins of their fathers, beseeching them to not repeat their elders’ mistakes: “Yet you would not go up, but rebelled against the Commandment of the Lord your G-d”, Devarim 1:26-27.

Our present generation is being beckoned as well, we too are being beseeched: “Come home and atone for the sins of your forefathers – Ayeka – where are you?” They couldn’t, or wouldn’t, make Aliyah; you can and should!  We must not rebel, we must go up!


RABBI YERACHMIEL RONESS was born and raised in Montreal, Canada. After serving as a congregational Rabbi and as a Hillel Director in New York City, he made Aliyah in 1983 with his wife Dina and their five young children.

Ever since, Rabbi Roness has dedicated his life to promoting Aliyah. First, as Rabbi of the Jewish Agency’s Absorption Centers, and subsequently as the executive director of the Aloh-Naaleh organization.

This article was taken from Rabbi Roness’s new book: Aloh Na’aleh – Eretz Yisrael and Aliyah in the Weekly Parshah.

 The book is for sale on Amazon.

Honenu to State Attorney: “Reopen the case”

Honenu Attorney Chayim Bleicher wrote a letter to the Appeals Department of the State Attorney’s office demanding that they order the reopening of an assault case and indict three Arabs who attacked a Jewish youth two years ago. In the letter, he described how a 15-year-old youth with an obviously Jewish appearance was chased by Arabs in a car after he, unknowingly, may have slightly delayed them while riding an electric bicycle in the Ramat Shlomo neighborhood of Jerusalem.

Honenu Attorney Chayim Bleicher commented on the case: “Examination of the investigative material and the video clips paints a very disturbing picture. A number of violent Arabs in a car chased a Jewish cyclist and brutally attacked him for, in their opinion, insulting their ‘honor’. As good citizens came to his aid, they attacked them and other passers-by with iron rods and rocks. … The police appropriately detained the attackers and interrogated them over several days. They changed their testimonies from interrogation to interrogation and in the end were forced to confess that their only motive was to defend their ‘honor’. To our shock, the Police Prosecution Department closed the case despite the serious violations.

“Closing the case sends a dangerous message to potential attackers to the detriment of public security. Moreover, from our experience, it is possible that the case was closed because the attackers filed a complaint with the police demanding to know why the Jews who helped the victim were not detained. The time has come for an unequivocal statement. Jews have the right to defend themselves and their fellow Jews from violent attackers. The prosecution’s rationale that citizens should expect to be assaulted without any intervention is a dangerous conception that could lead to the murder of Jews. The Jews who intervened should be praised for their assistance. Attempts to equate a brawl between two fighters, with an attack on an innocent citizen such as in this case, are catastrophic and should be eradicated. We demand that the authorities prosecute the attackers to the full extent of the law and stop discouraging Jews from defending themselves.”

Maon resident accused by foreign anarchist exonerated

The Be’er Sheva District Court exonerated a Havat Maon resident accused of assaulting foreign left-wing activists near his community in the Southern Har Hevron region. The resident was detained a year and a half ago and indicted for aggravated assault. Honenu Attorney Avihai Hajbi is representing the resident.

Honenu Attorney Avichai Hajbi welcomed the verdict and said, “The court ruled that during cross-examination, it was revealed that the State wanted to convict my client on the basis of unreliable testimony from the complainant – a foreign anarchist and manipulative liar. The court also ruled that the Israel Police tried to incriminate my client by deceptive means. I am pleased that the court did not submit to pressures from either the State Attorney’s office or the US Embassy and exonerated my client.

Three detained at protest over Arab workers at Bruchin

Screenshot, the protest in Emanuel; Photo credit: Free use

In June, demonstrators in Efrat protested against the decision to allow the entrance of Arab workers to their communities. Demonstrators protested twice in Emanuel; please click here and here.

On July 28, dozens of Yehuda and Shomron residents protested against the entrance of Arab workers to the community of Bruchin in the Shomron. Three protesters were detained and taken to the Ariel Police Station. Honenu Attorney Daniel Shimshilashvili provided the detainees with legal counsel. They were released after interrogation.

Honenu Attorney Daniel Shimshilashvili: “These groundless detentions should not have taken place, particularly since there have been many examples recently where demonstrators who commit violence against and throw lit torches at police officers were released within a short time. The protesters at Bruchin wanted to support the State and highlight the foolishness regarding the potential dangers of bringing Arab workers into Jewish communities. Instead of the police authorities supporting this position they silenced protesters who were expressing a legitimate fear. They detained protesters, treating them as criminals, even though they had not violated any law. The police treat protesting Yehuda and Shomron residents with an iron fist, but anarchists protesting and causing disturbances on Kaplan Street are treated with kid gloves. This discrimination must stop. We will act with all available means to that end.”

Detained Sde Teiman soldiers describe incident

On July 31, Honenu Attorneys Nati Rom and Adi Keidar, who are representing three of the soldiers from the Sde Teiman Military Base who were detained on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist, revealed the soldiers’ testimonies of the incident. Prior to a hearing on the appeal that they filed against the extension of the soldiers’ remand, Attorney Rom leveled sharp criticism at the Military Advocate General’s office over their treatment of the soldiers: “They took the best of our soldiers who have been devoting their lives for many months in defense of Israel, at a task that nobody could do in their stead, against the worst of our enemies. Masked Israeli forces detained Israeli soldiers as if they were hardened criminals. They did not accept the soldiers’ testimony or attempt to question them. They simply detained all the soldiers who were present during the incident, including those who were outside of the immediate area. This behavior by the military authorities is unacceptable The disgrace will be remembered forever.”

Honenu Attorney Adi Keidar added: “The Military Criminal Investigation Division inexplicably invested vast resources to prove the outrageous claims of a despicable terrorist. The accused [the detained soldiers] are eight normative people who have families. I hope that the court will understand the situation and that the unnecessary detentions should be canceled immediately.”

Honenu Attorney Nati Rom detailed the soldiers’ testimony of the incident over which they were detained: “My clients were asked by the prison commander to conduct a search of the cell of a number of prisoners who arrived at the facility because they posed a potential danger. These prisoners are classified as violent and dangerous. During the search of one of the terrorists, he attacked them, and attempted to bite two soldiers and wrest a taser from one of them. [The soldiers] were forced to use force to restrain [the terrorist]. The soldiers did not strip the terrorist during the search. They used reasonable force commensurate with the situation. The difference between the fake news that the media published and what actually occurred is obvious. We reiterate that the prisoner is an arch-terrorist, a rapist, and a murderer.

Honenu Attorney Nati Rom described the difficult emotional reaction of the soldiers’ families to the detentions: “None of the soldiers have criminal records. On October 7, they went out to defend Israel. One of my clients lost his father in a terror attack. He was detained on the anniversary of his father’s murder. His wife and children are distraught. The defamation will never be forgotten. On the day that my clients are released, everyone who had a part in their detention and mistreatment should apologize to them.”

At the appeal, Attorneys Rom and Keidar demanded immediate release of the soldiers.

Please click here for a statement from Hila, the wife of one of the soldiers detained yesterday at the Sde Teiman military base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist, leveled sharp criticism at the Military Advocate General over his detention. Also, the court ignored the soldiers’ concerned families and held a hearing in their absence.

Initially, Honenu Attorneys Rom and Keidar were prevented on various pretexts from meeting with the detainees and granting them legal counsel.

Incitement, genocide, genocidal terror, and the upstream role of indoctrination: can epidemiologic models predict and prevent?

We apply the models and tools of epidemiology and public health to propose a unified field theory showing the role of ideologies, indoctrination, and incitement, in genocide, genocidal terror, and terror by groups or individuals.
We examine the effects of indoctrination and incitement as exposures and risks in relation to genocide and genocidal terror.
Incitement has been recognized as a trigger to these outcomes but indoctrination is upstream to incitement.
Population-wide exposure to indoctrination increases susceptibility to the effects of incitement.
These relationships have been seen in all major genocides and genocidal terror in the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries.
There is some insight into the relationship between ideology, incitement, and genocidal acts of violence from the so-called localized genocides in Bosnia, Rwanda, Darfur, Syria, and most recently, among the Rohingya in Myanmar.
There is a need to recognize the upstream role of ideologies of hate in order to determine the degree to which indoctrination posed, and continues to pose, a contributing factor.
Epidemiologic models, such as the iceberg model of exposure and disease and the concept of “sick individuals” and “sick populations,” guide our understanding of the content and spread of indoctrination and incitement and can provide essential insights for prevention.
The hateful indoctrination and ideologies behind genocidal violence must be countered and replaced by positive ideologies and role models that emphasize respect for life and human dignity for all.

Olympic Shames

Olympiads and Jews do not have a gold medal relationship.

With the inauguration of this competition by the ancient Greeks, it became a festival dedicated to pagan worship and symbolized everything that Judaism opposed. Deliberately turning it into a provocative orgy of physical prowess in the midst of Jerusalem guaranteed an inevitable counter-reaction from the subjugated Jews.

The Greeks viewed these games as a perfect way to entice Jews to assimilate and thus weaken any resistance to foreign rule.

The subsequent occupying Romans were no better.

Herod went so far as to dedicate the Olympiads to Caesar and even named one of his daughters, Olympia. In addition to all the pagan rites the Romans introduced cruel and sadistic “sports” to the events.

This included throwing prisoners of all ages, most probably including Jews caught fighting against Roman rule, before wild beasts in gladiatorial contests.

These Greek and Roman-sponsored competitions created a very negative reaction among a Jewish population already groaning under increasingly harsh illegal occupation.

Although, in due course, the overt pagan and vicious cruelty aspects were abolished, it took a long time before Jewish involvement became an acceptable feature. With Jews facing bans, boycotts and exclusion as well as pogroms in Europe the prospects for Jewish competitors were bleak. Even in so-called enlightened places like the United Kingdom and the USA, entrenched prejudices and class discrimination prevented any mass participation.

The film Chariots of Fire highlighted the struggle that Jewish athlete Harold Abrahams had in being chosen for the 1924 Olympics, where he won the gold medal in the 100-meter race. Upper-class anti-Jewish prejudice personified the underlying prejudices of the time.

With the advent of Nazi and fascist ideology, the Olympic movement revealed its moral bankruptcy when faced with unmistakable hate against Jews. Prejudice against black athletes was still endemic in the USA but this did not prevent Jesse Owens from representing that country. His brilliant performance in Berlin certainly upset the Nazi regime.

However, when it came to Jews, the Olympic management surrendered without a fight to the charades perpetrated by Hitler and his henchmen.

It was scandalous that the Games were ever allowed to be hosted by Germany, especially when it was perfectly obvious that by 1936, Jews in that country were being deprived of their civil rights. Exclusion from universities, professions and sporting clubs, plus loss of citizenship, foreshadowed a dark and ominous future. Yet, despite these clear violations of every Olympic principle, the Third Reich was confirmed as the host country.

Proving that you can always fool most of the people most of the time the streets were sanitized of their virulently anti-Jewish posters and graffiti and a major campaign of deception undertaken in order to convince Olympic officials that nothing was amiss. Swastika flags and banners adorned every building and lamppost and the virtues of Aryan supremacy were on display in the media of the time.

Shamefully, the IOC ignored all the warning signs and insisted that “the games must go on.” Even more disgracefully, many athletes and officials from various countries gave the Nazi salute as they marched past Hitler in the opening ceremony.

In 1972, at the Munich Olympics, Palestinian Arab terrorists perpetrated kidnapping and murder of Israeli competitors and officials. One would have thought that given their past lamentable record, the IOC might have considered something stronger than a short pause and a few minutes of silence. In an eerie echo of the Berlin fiasco, officials insisted that ”the games must go on” and that those countries that overtly and covertly promoted terror against Jews should face no consequences.

Compounding this collapse of any semblance of moral backbone is a refusal to hold memorial commemorations as an official part of the opening or closing ceremonies. It has fallen to Jewish groups to organize such gatherings either on the fringes of the games themselves or as separate events.

This brings us to the current festival of sport taking place in France.

In the face of terror threats, the French and IOC authorities have once again capitulated and refused to hold a public memorial ceremony for the murdered Israelis. Instead, like the Jews of Inquisition times, it will be held in a secret location with scant publicity. No doubt someone from the IOC will shed the usual crocodile tears and utter banal remarks.

Unfortunately, the current Olympics have already proven that nothing has been learned from past history.

Apologists will claim that the fact Israel has been allowed to compete is proof that all is well. However, it might be useful to delve a bit more closely into the poisonous maelstrom seething just below the surface.

Why have countries that openly proclaim as their objective the complete annihilation of Israel been allowed to compete? Why are countries whose competitors refuse to face Israelis or shake their hands not been expelled from the Olympics? Why are countries that sponsor and finance terror against Israelis permitted to take part?

Presumably, if these nations can be valued members of the United Nations and its associated bodies, they can also take part in sporting competitions. How low can the international community sink before it drowns in its own hypocrisy?

To qualify as competitors, sportspeople must attain certain levels of Olympic proficiency in their chosen discipline.

This strict requirement, however, obviously does not apply when it comes to Arabs from the Palestinian Authority. The IOC has permitted eight representatives from the non-existent country of Palestine to take part. Only one of them reached the qualifying standard. However the IOC created a new fictitious category which allows all of them to compete.

As though this were not derisive enough, the comments of these individuals and the background of the head of the Ramallah-based Olympic committee should clearly expose the scandalous situation.

The head of the PA Olympic Committee and also football association is none other than convicted terrorist Jibril Rajoub. In 1970, he was arrested for throwing a grenade at an Israeli bus and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was subsequently released in exchange for Israeli hostages. Returning to terror activities when the intifadas started, Rajoub was again arrested and later again released. Given these qualifications, Arafat promoted him to head the PA security apparatus.

This paragon of the Olympic spirit is on record as declaring, “Jews deserved the genocide inflicted by the Nazis” and “if the PA had a nuclear bomb it would use it against Israel.”  He has also lobbied FIFA and the IOC to ban Israel. Just in case his messages are not clear enough the sportspeople allowed to participate in Paris added that “they are symbols of the resistance” which in plain language means legitimizing the murder of Israelis.

None of these inconvenient facts, of course, have made any impression on the Olympic movement, with pontificators bending backward to appease hypocritical politicians and a media hopelessly mired in preconceived bias.

In this atmosphere of make-believe and deliberate denial of reality, the Israeli team of contestants faces a barrage of abuse and threats, necessitating the deployment of an army of police and security personnel in order to keep them safe.

Instead of allowing the Rajoub-led representatives to compete in sports they are not qualified to take part in, perhaps more in keeping with the distorted spirit of the times, the following new categories of sports could be created. This would undoubtedly give the terror-supporting entrants much more of a chance at winning a coveted Olympic medal.

Drive by shooting, kidnapping, tunnelling, stabbing, projectile hurling, rocket firing, and long jumping off tall buildings for LGBTQ supporters.

Incidentally, has anyone noticed that the windsurfing competitions are taking place in FRENCH OCCUPIED Polynesia (Tahiti)? What are the colonial French still doing in this territory? Where are the protesters to be seen?

Finally, if anyone needed proof of how effectively the Olympic movement has been subverted, just take note of the fiasco at the opening ceremony. In a display worthy of its pagan roots and symbolic of the moral decay of the last days of the Roman Empire, a drag queen float mocking the Christian last supper was a feature.

Would the organizers ever have dared to mock Islam in such a blatant manner?  Of course not, because if they had done so, lethal consequences would have swiftly followed.

Welcome to the latest manifestations of how this wonderful sporting spectacle has been shamefully hijacked and distorted.

End Your (Personal) Wandering in the Desert

A person walking through the sand, leaving footprints on the dunes at Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Original public domain image from Wikimedia Commons

This week we read Pashi’ot Matot and Mas’ei, Parshat Mas’ei begins with the words “Eleh mas’ei”- These are the journeys of Bnei Yisrael. The Torah describes – in painstaking detail – each and every stopover the Jewish people took on their path through the desert, as they made their way from Egypt to Eretz Yisrael. All together forty-two journeys and encampments are enumerated. Sometimes they ‘stopped-over’ in a specific place for a very brief period, while at other times there were extended lengthy encampments.

The question we might ask (together with the Midrash Hagadol) is: What is the purpose of listing all of the 42 journeys? “They journeyed, and then they encamped. They journeyed, then they encamped…” – At some point (rather early on some might say…) we seem to have already gotten the picture…

There are several approaches to answer this question. Rashi provides an explanation, based on the Tanchuma, likening the situation to that of a king (G-d) dealing with a son who had become ill. The father gathered his sick and delirious child and travelled with him a great distance until they finally found a cure to successfully remedy his situation. Upon their happy return home, the father provided the son with running commentary recounting each and every step they took along the way: “Here’s where we slept one of the nights; here is where we felt the cold; here you complained of a headache, etc. etc. What was the father’s purpose in telling over these details? Perhaps one can suggest that this recounting was to show that while the end-goal (the cure) is of supreme importance, the process too must not be overlooked. Much can be learned from our historical experiences, both as individuals as well as a People. For indeed: “Those who forget their past are doomed to repeat it”.

The Biblical description is prescriptive as well. For as a People, we go through the same pattern time after time, as we make our way back again to Eretz Yisrael, our final destination. It was Kierkegaard who said: “Life must be understood backward but lived forward.”

As mentioned earlier, the stopovers in the Parsha were of varied duration. This was true of our People’s journey through history as well. While some stays were short, others were much much longer. Our lengthy stay in Spain and Portugal came to an abrupt end with the Expulsions as people slowly made their way towards the Ottoman Empire. In his book “Farewell Espana”, Howard Sachar reports that in the year 1576, the city of Constantinople was home to close to 30,000 Jews, crowning it – at the time – with the title of the largest Jewish city in the world.

It would seem, that over the ages the Jewish People gravitate to the centers of contemporary civilization.

Bearing this in mind, it is interesting to note that presently, the metropolitan area with the largest Jewish population in the world is Tel-Aviv (Gush-Dan)!

Although so many have returned home, nonetheless, countless others continue to wander in the desert – albeit not the Sinai Desert, but rather the wilderness of “Midbar HaAmim”- the wilderness of the Peoples, (Yechezkel 20:35).

According to the Malbim, this expression encapsulates the notion that for the Jewish People life amongst the nations is akin to a journey through the desert. We must realize that when separated and distanced from the Holy Land, we are in truth like a vagabond in the desert lacking access to all basic (spiritual) necessities.

Reading through the lengthy chronicle of our journey through the desert serves as a reminder that not all those who began the journey merited to see its conclusion and enter the Holy Land. Even Moshe Rabbeinu himself, who personally brought the nation to the penultimate step, was buried outside. This is reminiscent of our own journey back to the Land. Many in our generation have merited to come home, but all their forbearers, buried in the four corners of the universe, each took part in the on-going journey of Jewish history. Each particular family saga is told, and retold again, as parents and children explain to the young generation: “Your great grandfather ran away from the pogrom and made it to… Your great grandmother survived the Holocaust and shortly afterwards found herself…

Each and every stage of our collective journey, was a steppingstone in the development of Am Yisrael, inching forwards towards the ultimate Geula.

Your children already know their family’s past – but what will their future hold? How long will it still take till your family leaves the desert and comes home? When will future generations, recounting the family’s personal tale, finally be able to include mention of the first ancestors to have made Aliyah?

It is in your power to decide that your family’s next encampment will be in Eretz Yisrael! The time has come to write your own personal verse: “Vayis’u M’-________ (*insert here your current location), Va’yachanu B’Eretz Yisrael, B’Eretz Hashem”!

B’ruchim Haba’im B’shem Hashem- Welcome home!


RABBI YERACHMIEL RONESS was born and raised in Montreal, Canada. After serving as a congregational Rabbi and as a Hillel Director in New York City, he made Aliyah in 1983 with his wife Dina and their five young children.

Ever since, Rabbi Roness has dedicated his life to promoting Aliyah. First, as Rabbi of the Jewish Agency’s Absorption Centers, and subsequently as the executive director of the Aloh-Naaleh organization.

This article was taken from Rabbi Roness’s new book: Aloh Na’aleh – Eretz Yisrael and Aliyah in the Weekly Parshah.

 The book is for sale on Amazon.