Palestinian and European Journalists Discuss Palestinian Arab media image

[With thanks to IMRA for distributing this important article]

Palestinian and European journalists agreed that the September 11 events constituted an important chapter in the media war between the Palestinians and the Israelis.

Several European journalists expressed the belief that Israel won the media battle after connecting the Intifada with terrorism and tagging the Palestinians as terrorists.

This came at a seminar about Palestinian and European media organized by the External Relations Council recently at Commodore Hotel in Gaza. Several journalists from the European Union participated, in addition to Palestinian media personalities.

Palestinian journalists presented a picture of the Palestinian media, while their European counterparts spoke about their ways of handling the Palestinian struggle, vehemently denying claims of bias and maintaining that they try to remain objective. Several of them said that they find it difficult to access information connected with the Palestinian side in the struggle with Israel, while Israeli embassies in their countries are active in distributing information about Israeli victims, tipping the media scale.

A Greek journalist said after expressing solidarity with the Palestinians, “suicide missions make things difficult and present a negative image of the Palestinians before the European public opinion. Western media cannot find justification for the missions and cannot exonerate the Palestinian side from charges of killing Israeli civilians.”

Said a Belgian journalist, “Suicide missions shake the balance that a journalist seeks at all times, just as Israeli air raids do. This posits western journalists in the middle, but they are still faced with accusations of bias from both sides.”

A Finnish journalist expressed the opinion that every party is trying to see the other party in all its brutality and savagery taken out of context, which is what journalists refuse to do, and are therefore accused of bias.”

A Spanish journalist offered, “Accusations of anti-Semitism are still being voiced against journalists that try to be fair to the Palestinians and try to practice their professions with democracy and objectivity.”

At the beginning of the meeting, several journalists presented complete pictures of the Palestinian media. Tawfeeq Abu Khousa, president of the Journalists Union in Gaza, spoke about violations committed by occupation soldiers against Palestinian journalists. “Palestinian martyrs total six so far, while 473 where harassed while performing their duties. Also, 170 journalists have been injured by live ammunition or rubber-coated steel bullets.”

Abu Khousa indicated violations of work rights committed by foreign media outfits against Palestinian journalists, who are denied work contracts and forced to use terms that accord with the interests of the Israeli side.

Sameer Al-Sharif, director of the Voice of Palestine radio service, said, “Occupation inflicted technical harm on Palestinian television and radio carriers and continually hinders the entry of equipment, delaying renovation and rehabilitation of local networks that make up the connection between the Palestinian people and leadership.

Journalist Talal Okal indicated the feebleness of investment in the Palestinian media due to military and security factors. He attributed most of the challenges facing Palestinian media to its weakness and the vast development of international media technology and techniques, in addition to financial, military and security factors, poor performance on the part of cadres in the field, and the already fragile Palestinian media infrastructure.

Okal stressed the difficulties facing the Palestinian media resulting from western media bias in favor of Israel, which also bespeaks the inability of the Palestinians to access the western public opinion.

Fayed Abu Shamaleh, BBC correspondent, called for providing Palestinian journalists with international press IDs that would help them overcome such obstacles as Israeli refusal to “recognize them.” He indicated the worries borne by journalists working for foreign outfits, subjected to discrimination and denied the chance to assume leadership roles.

At the end of the meeting, former Finance Minister Salam Fayyadh demonstrated in detail the financial reform begun by the PNA. He answered questions from Palestinian and European journalists, emphasizing that the corruption scandal received undue attention in the media.

Fayyadh indicated that the Finance Ministry opened its doors before the General Monitoring Council to facilitate transparency and accountability specified in the reform plan.

Ziyad Abu Amr, president of the External Relations Council, interrupted Fayyadh, asking, “Is the General Monitoring Council itself trustworthy to receive such a role? The council prepared reports about women in the PNA but banned publishing of the report in the media and refused the Legislative Council access to it.”

Fayyadh stressed that reform is an internal, not imported, desire and that the Finance Ministry began reform as soon as the plan was announced.

Abu Amr participated in the two-day meeting on the hope that it could lead to defining the role of the media in bringing to an end the struggle between the Palestinians and the Israelis. He explained that the meeting strives to uncover and treat the reasons that lead to bias in the media.

The representative of the European Union in Jerusalem said that the participation of European journalists reveals solidarity with their Palestinian counterparts. She added that the meeting also proves anew the care that the EU Delegation lends to stability in the region, stressing the role of journalists in achieving it.

This article appreared on the September 26th 2000 issue of the Jerusalem Times

PA Turns Suspect Over To Hamas For Execution

[Please refer to this article in which we reported on the efforts to save this young man from execution.]

Jerusalem (CNSNews.com) – A Palestinian student accused of collaborating for Israel was found dead in a garbage dump in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday. He had been in the custody of the Palestinian Authority police.

Akram Mohammed al-Zatma, 22, was arrested on August 8 for allegedly helping Israel assassinate Hamas founder and leader Salah Shehade and Fatah Tanzim leader Jihad al-Omarayan.

The case gained some international notoriety when Israeli lawyer Nitsana Darshan-Leitner and others spearheaded a campaign on al-Zatma’s behalf, appealing to the Vatican to intervene.

Monsignor Pietro Sambi, head of the Apostolic Delegation, the equivalent of the Vatican’s Embassy in Jerusalem said he had intervened on behalf of al-Zatma.

“I intervened,” Sambi told CNSNews.com in a brief telephone interview. “I won’t go into details [about the intervention]. I am very sad that the result has not been positive.”

Asked by al-Zatma’s family to represent him, Darshan-Leitner appealed to Palestinian Justice Minister Ibrahim Abu Daghmeh for the right to represent her client in the PA court. She never received a reply from Abu Daghmeh, she said.

Darshan-Leitner, who has been involved previously in cases of Palestinians accused of collaborating with Israel, feared he would not receive a fair trial in the PA.

International and Palestinian human rights groups have criticized the PA in the past for trying alleged collaborators in the security court, with little or no defense and a swift sentencing and execution.

In al-Zatma’s case, Hamas had demanded that he be killed even without legal proceedings or a basic trial, Darshan-Leitner said in a statement on Tuesday. She charged that Gaza Security Chief Rashid Abu Shabak gave in to their demand and turned over his prisoner.

“The gangland style murder of al-Zatma was carried out jointly by the Gaza security police and Hamas,” Darshan-Leitner said.

“Gaza security boss Rashid Abu Shabak proudly displayed the young student at a press conference and then permitted Hamas to murder him in cold blood without even a sham trial,” she said.

Darshan-Leitner also accused human rights groups such as Amnesty International of turning a blind eye to the plight of collaborators until after they are killed, saying they have a political agenda “which does not include assisting those accused of aiding Israel.”

Amnesty International had no immediate response to al-Zatma’s murder and referred to an earlier press release expressing concern over “the abduction and killing by Palestinian armed groups of Palestinians who have allegedly collaborated with the Israeli intelligence services.”

AI said on Tuesday that if it received enough information before an event it could send out an urgent appeal.

But Darshan-Leitner said requests for help in an earlier case had been ignored. This piece ran on the CNS wire on September 24th, 2002

Chaya Raanan: Profile of Courage in Hebron

Screams of terror and pain pierced the silent Hebron night. The screams were coming from the bedroom where Rabbi Shlomo Ra’anan, was preparing to retire for the night. Chaya Ra’anan, who was in the dining room, barely recognized the sound of her husband’s voice, whom in their thirty-five years of marriage, had never been heard to raise his voice. Seconds later, the rabbi, covered in blood, staggered out of the bedroom, while the terrorist, who held a long and bloody butcher knife in one hand, tried with the other hand to drag him back into the bedroom. Stunned, Chaya screamed while she instinctively tried to pull her husband out of the terrorist’s grasp. A tug-of-war ensued until finally the terrorist let go, not before hurdling the butcher knife at the mortally wounded rabbi and setting the trailer on fire. It was too late to save her husband. Chaya, being a nurse, knew from the gaping wound in her husband’s main artery that his condition was fatal. Seeing the flames around her it was now up to her to alert the six other families living in the neighboring inflammable trailers before they too went up in flames. Chaya threw open the door and shouted, “Fire! Fire!”


On August 20th, 1998, Rabbi Shlomo Ra’anan was murdered. Rabbi Shlomo, 66, and his wife Rebbetzin Chaya, 59, were one of the seven families living in the Tel Romeida, Jewish neighborhood in the heart of Hebron. In the seventeen years of its existence, permission had been steadfastly been turned down by the Israeli government to expand the neighborhood beyond the initial seven trailers.

Rav Shlomo was loved and admired by all who came in contact with him. “He was a gentle and modest man – a man of peace”, says his widow, Chaya Ra’anan. “He would greet everyone he saw on the street with a smile and a shalom. Even the Arabs here respected him. The Arab children used to run after him saying shalom, shalom. Though he was a great Talmid Chacham, he would relate to even the smallest child as an equal.”

Rav Shlomo was the only grandson of Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak Ha’Cohen Kook, the first Rabbi of the Land of Israel. Rabbi Kook had modest living quarters in one of the sections of the Rav Kook Yeshiva. Shlomo’s mother who was the only child of the Rabbi’s three children to have her own children, inherited the quarters and brought up her family there. Rav Shlomo’s father also served as the head of the Yeshiva. Shlomo spent most of his life within the walls of the yeshiva studying Torah. Besides learning at the Yeshiva, Rav Shlomo also worked at the Institute of Halacha Brura which is part of the yeshiva and publishes books.”

“I was twenty-one and Shlomo was twenty-eight when we married”, says Chaya. “Our wedding was a very special affair. It took place at the Mercaz HaRav Yeshiva’s courtyard. Prominent rabbis came from all over the country. All the beggars of Jerusalem were invited to partake in the festivities. The beggars sat alongside of the prominent rabbis.”

“In our circles, marriages are arranged through matchmakers. The first time I lay eyes on my husband was at the matchmaker’s house where a meeting had been set up between us. Though it wasn’t the Sabbath when we met, I felt like it was. Shlomo was a person of the Sabbath. His whole being was of sanctity and purity where he totally immersed himself in the learning of the Torah and the worship of God.

“Shortly before my arrival, Shlomo had eaten a meal at the matchmaker’s house and he was benching when I walked in. I was deeply impressed by the sincerity and depth of his prayer. The manner in which he prayed said a lot about him even before he saw me or said one word to me.

“I loved going to Shlomo’s house. There was an atmosphere of dignity there. I loved and admired Shlomo’s mother, who was Rabbi Kook’s daughter. She was an incredibly unassuming woman, asking nothing for herself, wearing only the most simple and modest of clothing, satisfied with the bare minimum. And yet she was imbued with this inner quality of nobility.

“Though at the time of our marriage, it had been twenty seven years since Rabbi Kook of blessed memory had passed away, it was not apparent in the household. His spirit was very much alive in the house. The Rabbi’s chair was at the head of the dining room table with a special rug beneath it. Nobody ever sat in it. The house, the kitchen and the yeshiva were all part of one unit. The yeshiva boys would walk in to the kitchen and help themselves to drinks and have a bite to eat. The kitchen was lovingly called ‘Cafe Ra’anan’.

“It was an ‘open house’ – the door was always open and people were always coming and going. They would help themselves to refreshments in the kitchen, even use the refrigerator. The door to the refrigerator was always broken as so many people were always opening and closing it. The essential quality of this house was that it was a house for the public. There was no feeling here that “a man’s house is his castle”. Anyone with something on his mind could just walk in and would gain a sympathetic ear to his woes. It was very much like a train station.

“Out of this house came also my mother-in-law’s brother, Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook, who later became the Head of ‘Mercaz Ha’Rav’, Rabbi Kook’s yeshiva. The leaders of Gush Emunim, the settler’s movement came out of the Mercaz Ha’Rav yeshiva.

The Ra’anans are parents to two sons and a daughter who are married with families of their own. For twenty years they lived in the Kiryat Moshe neighborhood adjacent to Mercaz haRav Yeshiva. Chaya worked as a nurse at the Hadassah Hospital. In 1992 the Ra’anan couple decided to move to the Tel Romeida neighborhood in Hebron. Tel Romeida was bought up by the Jewish community in Hebron over 180 years ago. During the period that Jordan conquered the land, no one lived here and the Arabs called it the ‘land of the Zionist enemy’.

Tel Romeida is also called ‘the Lands of Yishai’ – Yishai was King David’s father and he lived at Tel Romeida with his family. There have been archeological excavations at this site which prove that this exact location is the Hebron mentioned in the Bible. King David ruled here for his first seven years of monarchy before ruling in Jerusalem.

Rav Shlomo, having learned his entire life the philosophy of Rav Kook which emphasizes the Mitzvah of yishuv Ha’aretz – settling the land of Israel, was thrilled to be able to fulfill this great Mitzvah.

“We didn’t think in terms of that we were moving to a dangerous place”, says Chaya. “On the contrary. We felt like we were moving to Gan Eden. My husband was so happy here – he became twenty years younger.”

“The graves of Yishai and his mother Ruth are right above our trailer, which my husband fondly called ‘our palace’. When we first moved here we were euphoric of the idea that we were living in the exact place where Abraham, Issac, and Jacob dwelled as well as King David. Entire chapters from the Bible occurred right outside our window here. What an incredible privilege!”

“When people ask me what brought us to Hebron – a place surrounded by hostile Arabs with only fifty Jewish families living in their midst – I tell the story of my great Uncle Zalman”, says Rebbetzin Chaya.

“I grew up in a rabbinical family, which was the fifth generation in Israel. In the 19th century five brothers from my father’s family immigrated from Poland to Israel. Each brother had served as a rabbi in various villages in Poland. One of those brothers, Rabbi Zalman Baharan, was one of the initiators of the Mea Shearim neighborhood in Jerusalem which was built in 1874. He was my guiding light. All the Jews at that time lived behind the walls of the Old City in Jerusalem. At 7:00 p.m. every night the gates to the walls would be locked for the night and opened again in the morning. A Jew going outside of the walls put himself at risk of getting mugged or murdered and the only place the Jews of Jerusalem felt any safety was within the confines of the walls. Any venture outside the confines of the walls was done in convoys. The Jewish community within the walls was overcrowded and sanitation conditions were poor.

“Rabbi Zalman decided to move with his wife and children and a small number of other families outside of the walls. The only other Jewish neighborhood that had done so previously was Mishkenot Shaananim in 1860.

“The new neighborhood was called Meah She’arim – one hundred gates, with the hope that the neighborhood would become one of a hundred new neighborhoods in Jerusalem. People warned my uncle against such a move, stating how they would be endangering their lives if they went ahead and moved out. Those days were much more dangerous than today. There was no Jewish state, Jewish policemen or Jewish army to protect you. Yet my great uncle took that first great step at considerable risk and his vision was fulfilled as we see today many Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem.

“Moving to Hebron, I had the same vision; that by moving here, despite the ‘so called danger’, we will have merited to be one of the first of many Jewish neighborhoods in Hebron.’

There is also a connection to Hebron from Chaya’s mother’s side; Her family were also residents of the Old City in Jerusalem. Her sister married a young yeshiva student from Lithuania whom together with a group of young scholars moved to Hebron to establish the Slobodka Yeshiva. They were living here in Hebron in 1929, the year of the great Jewish massacre. Chaya’s mother who was thirteen at the time, together with her seven year old sister came to Hebron to visit their married sister who had given birth to her first-born a month and a half previously. The weekend they came to visit was the weekend of the pogrom. Their sister’s husband was delayed in Jerusalem and was not able to make it back to Hebron in time for the Sabbath. Already at the onset of the Sabbath, word had gotten out that the Arabs were plotting against the Jewish community in Hebron. Chaya’s aunt’s next door neighbor was rabbi Salonim, chief rabbi of Hebron. Across from his house lived his son who was the owner of Hebron’s only bank, which was frequented by Jews and Arabs alike. This son was on very good relations with the Arabs in Hebron. The banker offered Chaya’s aunts and mother to come and hide at his house, as he was sure that the Arabs would not do him or anyone in his house any harm, because he was known and respected by the Arabs in Hebron. Chaya’s aunt, the ultimate Yiddishe Mama, declined the offer fearing that her infant would contact some disease staying in one room with so many people.”

“This weighty decision is what actually saved their lives and I wouldn’t be here to tell the tale if it wasn’t for that decision. After failing to persuade my aunt and her sisters to come and hide at his house, the banker then continued next door to his father where he implored him to seek refuge at his home. The rabbi said that he couldn’t just leave Leah (my aunt) and her sisters behind and if they were staying – then he too would stay behind. The rabbi invited my mother and her sisters and the infant to stay out the pogrom at his house and hide there. My aunt who was seven at the time (now she’s over seventy) was peering out the Rabbi’s window, and saw her playmate, the banker’s son, from the house across the street, run yelling to his father, saying; Abba! Abu Mussaf is coming here to kill you! And at that moment witnessed the murder of her playmate and his father, the banker.”

The banker who was so trusting of the Arabs’ friendship to the extent that he urged friends and neighbors to come hide at his house – was slaughtered with almost all his family and the people who came to hide at his house. The death toll from that house alone was 18. Only one baby survived, having fainted from the trauma and left for dead.

While hiding at the rabbi’s house, Chaya’s mother and aunt helped the rabbi move a huge closet against the door. Outside the door, the Arab landlord blocked the entrance to the house with his body not letting anyone in. He sustained injuries as a result but succeeded in preventing anyone to gain entrance into the house. This Arab risked his life to save the Jews inside because not long before the massacres, his son was gravely ill and a Jewish doctor was able to nurse him back to health. This made a great impression on the Arab and he vowed to do what he can not to let any harm come to the Jews.

The death toll of the Hebron massacre was 67 men women and children who were murdered by axes, butcher knives, rocks and other tools. Hundreds of severely wounded survived with mutilated bodies, limbs and other parts of their bodies brutally chopped off by axes, even babies and very young children were not spared. The survivors were left to live with the abhorrent memories of their spouses and children murdered before their eyes. There were many cases of rape of young girls straight out of Tora seminaries. One report was of a gang rape of a sixteen year old girl by thirteen Arabs witnessed by her little sister who was hiding under the bed. Another eyewitness reported of a young Jewish girl who was stripped naked to be raped and imploring her tormentors to kill her rather than desecrate her body. Her last wish as “honored”.

The Hebron Massacre brought to a close the end of thousands of years of consecutive Jewish habitation in the cities of the Fathers. The wounded and the dead were moved to Jerusalem and Jews were unable to set foot in Hebron until the liberation of the city in 1967.

Following the funeral of Rav Shlomo Ra’anan, Chaya spent a sleepless night wondering what she should do. How could she go back and live in the house where her husband was murdered. “What now?”, she asked herself. “What does God want from me, what is my role now? This is something a Jew needs to do every stage of his life,” says Chaya. “He must ask himself what is his role in life, why is he here in this world. The roles change as we go through different stages in life.”

Chaya kept thinking of Rav Mordechai Eliyahu’s words at the funeral – to ‘erect a yeshiva on Shlomo’s grave’. “Shlomo’s entire life was the learning of the Torah, says Chaya. He was known for his love of his fellow man and his gentle and modest ways. By personal example he exemplified what it is to be a rabbi: good qualities, honorable, modest and honest. When the terrorist so violently took my husband’s life, he sought to extinguish the light – the Torah has always been a parallel to light. When people asked me whether I wanted revenge, I answered that revenge will not bring my husband back to me. Only God can take revenge for what that terrorist did for murdering such a person as my husband. Even if they were to kill the terrorist a hundred times, it would not bring my husband back.”

Following that sleepless night, Chaya knew what she was going to do. During the first day of sitting shiva, she gathered around her the heads of the Jewish yishuv of Hebron and told them of her decision to build a Kollel out of the bedroom where her husband was murdered. Within less than a month the Kollel became a reality. It is a Kollel which prepares choice young men for the Rabbinate and is led by Chaya’s son-in-law, HaRav Yisrael Shlisel, who travels here daily two hours each way. Among the young men learning there is also Chaya’s son, Michael Ra’anan, who lives on Kibbutz Rosh Tzurim. The name of the Kollel is “Ohr Shlomo”.

“My revenge, in a sense, is by opening this kollel, says Chaya. “This whole house is my husband; the holy books lining the wall, many of them belonging to his holy grandfather. I wanted this house to continue breathing and living Torah just as if my husband were still alive. Where the terrorist sought to bring darkness, this Kollel has brought forth light. I had the room where my husband was murdered expanded, people donated books and my son-in law travels every day two hours in each direction to head the kollel here. These men study here everyday from 9:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. No matter what is going on outside – they come. There is not a trailer here that is not riddled with bullets from the Arabs who continue to try and eliminate us. But the Torah protects us, and thank God, no one has been hurt.

“I derive much comfort from the sound of these men learning Torah all day. I feel like they are my sons and their voices serve to soothe my pain over the loss of my husband.”

This article was excerpted in the summer 2002 issue of Jewish Action

CIA Training of Palestinian Security Forces Begins

Jerusalem (CNSNews.com) – The CIA has opened its first training course for PA security forces, designed to help them better combat terror.

About thirty PA security officers attended the opening session in PA-controlled Jericho on Monday evening, and more were expected at a second session on Tuesday, reports here said.

President Bush has called for an overhaul of the PA security forces. The U.S., European Union, United Nations and Russia — the so-called quartet — are working together in a task force (along with other international players) to promote and develop reforms in the PA.

Nevertheless, the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv is being tight-lipped about the training program and would not even confirm that it is taking place. (Palestinian and Israeli officials have confirmed the existence of the training program under CIA auspices.)

Instead, Embassy spokesman Paul Patin said that the U.S. is committed to helping Israel and the PA resume security cooperation, seen as a vital first step to restoring permanent calm and eventual political negotiations between the sides.

“We remain committed to helping the parties in any way we can to restore active security cooperation and advance the strategy agreed to by the parties, the quartet and the international task force on reform,” Patin said on Tuesday.

PA sources were quoted in the Jerusalem Post on Tuesday as saying that American, Jordanian and Egyptian security experts were involved in re-training the PA officers in new methods for combating terror.

Many of those involved in the program belong to the Preventive Security Service, headed by Zuheir Manasreh; while others belong to the General Intelligence, run by Tawfik Tirawi.

Manasreh attended the opening session, reports said, but Tirawi could not because he is wanted by Israel in connection with terrorist attacks.

Tirawi has reportedly been holed up in PA Chairman Yasser Arafat’s headquarters in Ramallah for the last five months in order to avoid arrest or other Israeli action against him.

An Israeli official said that while the training was not part of an agreement between Israel and the PA, it is part of PA reforms under the guidance of the quartet and task force.

Israel is “aware and informed” but not directly involved, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

International experts were involved in training PA security forces when they were established as part of the first Israeli-PLO agreement in 1993.

Although there were agreed-upon restrictions regarding the number of officers and who would be allowed to participate, the new Palestinian police force quickly developed into well-armed “army” with tens of thousands more “policemen” than were originally permitted.

The Israeli official said that Israel is not concerned as long as the training is conducted in coordination with the quartet and within the framework of PA reforms.

“We want to see a… dramatic change in the sphere of [PA] security,” the official said. “That is why we are getting assistance from the Americans… We’re interested in the end result.”

The Americans have been scrutinizing the participants to make sure that those being trained have no previous direct or indirect connection with terrorist activity, he added.

CIA director George Tenet became involved in training the PA security forces under former U.S. President Bill Clinton. Tenet was reportedly one of the few, if not the only, American official that PA Chairman Yasser Arafat trusted.

Shortly after taking office, President Bush withdrew the CIA’s involvement in the Israeli-PA conflict in an attempt to lessen direct U.S. involvement in the region and force the parties to resolve the conflict between themselves.

But Tenet was sent back to the region several months later to negotiate a ceasefire agreement between Israel and the PA in June 2001. Although both sides confirmed the agreement, the understanding was never implemented.

This piece ran on the CNS wire on September 17, 2002

Media Scrambles For Rooftops in Tel Aviv

The attack in Iraq has not begun yet and no special alert has been declared yet in Israel, but the foreign media is already preparing for the possibility that missiles will fall in the greater Tel Aviv area.

In the past number of days producers for televisian crews and photographers who work from Israel have begun looking for high and appropriate rooftops to capture incoming Iraqi Scud missiles, in the event that they should fall on the greater Tel Aviv area. Eleven years ago, in January 1991, nearly all the foreign teams collected on the roof of the Tel Aviv Hilton Hotel, and turned the hotel into a world media center. But since then a number of particularly tall buildings have been built in the area, including the Azrieli towers, the Rubinstein towers and the Sheraton City Tower-and the competition over the foreign media crews is fierce.

Marianne Inbar, a producer for the British Sky television network, said that this week she will take a special tour on the rooftops of the Azrieli towers, Dizengoff Center, the Sheraton City Tower and the Hilton and the David Continental hotels.

“There is a professional dilemma as to where to position the camera team,” explained Reut Oron, a senior producer in a production company that provides services to foreign television networks, “we need to take into account the location of the Patriot missiles so as to get them when they are fired and at the same time to get as much of the view of greater Tel Aviv as possible so as to catch the falling Scuds.” She said she believed that the more “spoiled” teams would ultimately prefer to set up in the hotels in the city, opting for those that provide the technical services that they need for broadcasting.

The fiercest battle is being fought out between the Hilton, for which many of the veteran teams still have a warm spot in their hearts, and the David Intercontinental, which offers newer equipment. Both hotels told Yedioth Ahronoth that a number of television crews had already booked rooms with them. Varda Shefel, the sales manager for the David Intercontinental, explained yesterday that the producers had special demands: they book at least one entire floor in the hotel with special connections to telephone lines and optic fibers, and demand quick access to the hotel rooftop.

This article appeared in Yedioth Ahronoth on September 18, 2002

Beillin’s Foundation Will not Disclose Basic Data Required by Israeli Law

[One of the most politically charged issues in Israel over the past few years has been the investigations of non-profit organizations. Two of Israel’s most powerful politicians, former Prime Minister Ehud Barak and former Interior Minister Aryeh Deri (just released from a two year jail sentence), had their political careers ruined because of police investigations into the mismanagement of the non-profit foundations which supported their work.

Yet in the case of the non-profit foundation which supports the work of Yossi Beilin, who is in the process of forming a new political party while criss-crossing the globe and promoting what he thinks Israel’s foreign policy should be, the Israeli law enforcement establishment must still decide if it will act against Beilin’s Non-profit organization. – DB]

The Economic Cooperation Foundation, pioneered by former Israel Justice Minister Yossi Beillin, finally submitted its financial report for the year 2000 to the Registrar of Non-Profit Organizations, yet neglected to report the income that it received from the European Union and foreign governments, the names of its high salaried employees, as well as the names of the Palestinians benefiting from ECF grants.

Exactly one day following the Makor Rishon newspaper’s latest investigative report (“Is Beillin Above the Law, July 26th, 2002) about the European Cooperation Foundation (ECF), which was founded and directed by Dr. Yossi Beillin, the foundation finally submitted its financial report for the year 2000 to the Registrar of Non-Profit Organization. The report was six months overdue. It is yet unclear how the foundation managed to get the report stamped on July 27th – which came out on the Sabbath Day – a day when the office would normally be closed.

The investigative reports published by Makor Rishon revealed that Beillin’s ECF, (which was founded in the beginning of the 1990’s, and which played a leading role in the secret meetings held between Israelis and Palestinians preceding the Oslo Accords) ignored the Registrar’s requirements to report the details of the foundation’s financial activities. Beillin’s foundation receives considerable funds from the EU and other international organizations, and divides them among the various left-wing organizations in Israel as well as Palestinian organizations. In fact, Beillin uses the funds received by his foundation for, amongst other things, running his own foreign policy campaign – one which is in direct opposition to the Government of Israel’s official Foreign Policy.

According to law, the reports submitted by every NPO must clearly differentiate between the NPO’s income accrued from sources coming from within Israel and income from sources abroad. But since 1992, Beillin’s foundation does not submit any details concerning income from sources abroad. The European Union financial records from the year 1999 showed Makor Rishon that in the year 2000 that s foundation received from them 400,000 Euro. The Norwegian Government’s financial reports showed that it donated 1. 7 million Norwegian Krone to Beillin’s foundation. Yet the ECF failed to report either source of income. Could it be that the ECF is engaged in double-bookeeping, and registering its income from foreign governments in another account or in another country?

The support accrued from the EU to Beillin’s foundation were in accordance to Clause 6 of the ECF by-laws, adopted at the time of the foundation’s genesis in 1991: “To encourage the European community to INTERVENE in the peace process between Israel and the Arab countries”. That would mean that Beillin, who served as Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister between the years 1992-1995, acted in a clear conflict of interest to Israel foreign policy, which has always opposed the “intervention” of outside powers into the middle east conflict – especially the EU.

Meanwhile, in the Year 2000 ECF financial report, the foundation failed to disclose the names of the five highest paid salaries in the ECF, as all NPO’s are required to do by law. The report only reveals that the highest paid salaries amount to NIS 2,900,000 of which in addition to the travelling expenses of NIS580,000 consist of 63% of the foundation’s expenses. The salaries of the five senior members of the foundation (whose names are undisclosed) amounted to NIS1,750,000: In other words, the average per annum salary of the foundation in the year 2000 a.m.ounted to NIS350,000. For some reason, the ECF will not disclose the identities of its high priced employees, as required by law. The minutes of the ECF showed that the foundation reported the names of its employees to its board of directors, yet not to the registrar or to the public.

Another piece of data that the registrar demanded from the ECF was also ignored by the foundation even though it was requested for specifically by the registrar, is the list of people who received grants from the ECF during the year 2000.

Instead, the foundation preferred to report the total amount of grants that it dispersed. rather than the names of the recipients. In the year 2000, the ECF provided grants in the amount of NIS 800,000 – a drastic increase of 250% as opposed to 1999, when the foundation’s grants amounted to NIS 225,000.. For some reason, the ECF will not disclose the identities of its grantees as required by law. The minutes of the ECF showed that the foundation reported the names of its employees to its board of directors, yet not to the registrar or to the public.

According to the ECF treasurer’s notification to its internal comptroller, these grants were awarded to “Palestinian professionals”. The fact that the foundation chose not to submit their names to the NPO’s registrar raises suspicion that Beillin’s ECF foundation finances members of the Palestinian National Council, or members of the Palestinian security services. The question remains: why is Beilin hiding this data and what will the law enforcement establishment of the state of Israel do about it?.

Published in Makor Rishon on September 13, 2002

PA Democracy in Action: Palestine Legislative Council Meets… And PA Security Services Round Up 200 Dissidents and Begin Executions

A side show to the middle east international news attention this week that was focused on Saddam Hussein was provided at the meeting of the Palestinian Legislative Council at the private office compound of Yassir Arafat in Ramallah, a gathering that was acclaimed by the world’s press as an exercise that exemplified Palestinian democracy.

So far, so good, unless you want to know the details of what really transpired this week in Ramallah.

Yet over the past two weeks, the Palestinian Authority security services have rounded up more than 200 dissidents, accusing them of cooperation with Israeli authorities.

In the words of Khaled Abu Tumah, writing in the Jerusalem Post on August 24, 2002, reported that all 200 jailed dissidents could expect to be executed very shortly. Many of them have complained of torture and may face execution. Among the suspects are former Fatah and Hamas members who have been leveling accusations against alleged widespread corruption in the Palestinian Authority.

Two of the suspects,are expected to go on trial before a “state security court” in Gaza next month. One of them is Haidar Ghanem, 39, a resident of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency Rafah refugee camp, who worked as a field researcher for a human rights organization.

A second dissident, Akram Zatmeh, 23, was arrested and accused of assisting Israel in the assassination of top Hamas terrorist Salah Shehadeh, on Gaza July 22.

Ghanem and Zatmeh will face the death penalty.

As the PLC convened,two other Palestinian dissidents in custody were summarily executed, and former Russian Jewish Prisoner of Zion Ida Nudel held a meeting with Papal ambassador to Israel, the Papal Annuncio, Msgr. Pietro Sambi to intervene on behalf of the dissidents against the Palestinian Authority.

As Nudel said to the Vatican ambassador, “we who were dissidents in a totalitarian regime know that only when the moral voices of the world make their voices heard will the lives of the dissidents be spared”.

However, Akram Zatmeh’s lawyer’s appeal to international human rights organizations to intervene on behalf of her condemned client fell on deaf ears.

Organizations such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the Association of Civil Rights in Israel have expressed no interest in the fate of 200 Palestinian dissidents. When I asked a high level delegation of European Union diplomats who visited the Palestinian Authority this week if they would intervene on behalf of 200 dissidents condemned to die by the PA, EU commissioner Anna Diammatopoulou would only answer with the platitude that “we know that there is a problem of human rights in the Palestinian Authority”.

It would seem that the spin masters of the Palestinian Authority have hypnotized the world’s media, diplomatic community and international human rights organizations into believing that 200 dissidents who were condemned to die are no more than “collaborators”, a term that connotes those European nationals who worked with the Nazis during World War II and who of course deserve to die.

As the PLC sessions continued in Ramallah, 200 PA dissidents sat in death row of the Palestinian Authority, and nobody seemed to care.

“Keep a Low Profile on Iraq”

The United States asked Israel to “keep a low profile” about Iraq for fear that statements by senior Israeli officials could sabotage its efforts to obtain international support in the coming war.

The Americans said that the many statements that have been made in Israel concerning Iraq are sabotaging its efforts to convince western countries, and some Arab countries, to support the attack on Iraq. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has decided to accede to the American request. President Bush congratulated Foreign Minister Peres that Israel stands forth as a loyal soldier in the war on terror. The two spoke at a luncheon given by the secretary general of the United Nations yesterday.

Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman Haim Ramon said yesterday that Israel does not need to establish red lines in a response to an Iraqi missile attack. “If a missile falls in the Negev and causes no damage, then of course we will not have to respond. If a non-conventional missile falls on a populated area and causes heavy losses, of course our response will be otherwise. Therefore I suggest that we not set red lines for ourselves,” Ramon said.

The Knesset Audit Committee will hold a special discussion on the home front’s preparedness for an Iraqi chemical or biological missile attack, committee chairman MK Ran Cohen has decided.

“I am anxious and worried that at a time when every child is aware of the possibility of a confrontation with Iraq, our defense systems are broadcasting complacency and unpreparedness, and Israel’s citizens are exposed to danger,” MK Cohen said. He announced that he will invite officers in the Home Front Command, the police and local authorities to the committee discussion, which State Comptroller Judge Eliezer Goldberg will attend. The committee will ask them for an accounting of the condition and availability of protective kits, bomb shelters and sealed rooms, and the state of preparedness of rescue and medical teams.

Ma’ariv checked and found that in the Upper Galilee and the Golan Heights, there are no stations for updating protective kits. Tens of thousands of residents in those areas must travel for at least an hour to reach a distribution station. It also found that there are only four such stations in the entire northern area. The IDF Spokesperson’s Office commented: “The Home Front Command is working according to an annual work plan and according to need. The location of distribution stations changes from time to time to respond to the needs of all citizens.”

But the Ramat Gan municipality has decided that if the city should fall under missile attack, residents will be evacuated to the Angel Forest near Beit Guvrin. The municipality will arrange for toilets, showers and shade, but not tents, and said that it has not yet received confirmation from the Home Front Command and that no preparations have been made there yet.

This piece ran in Maariv on September 15, 2002

Evacuating Ramat Gan Residents During the War?

Officials in the Ramat Gan municipality tried yesterday to maintain secrecy regarding the exact site to which the residents of the city would be evacuated in the event of a missile attack on Israel.

However, Yedioth Ahronoth has learned that the area designated by the municipality for its residents is the “Angels Forest” between Kiryat Gat and Beit Guvrin. According to assessments, the site is capable of absorbing at least several thousand residents, who will choose to take the municipality’s advice and abandon the city in favor of the hiding place.

The work files prepared by the municipality indicate that the residents are supposed to arrive in their private vehicles, supplied with food, drink and perhaps a small tent, which will serve the families for orderly sleeping arrangements in the park. The municipality has already prepared special access paths at the entrances to the park, and when the signal is given, the residents will be provided with the equipment lacking in order to enable their stay in the site, even for several days.

The decision of Ramat Gan Mayor Zvi Bar, which was published yesterday in Yedioth Ahronoth, aroused many reactions among mayors around the country. Bar, however, still stands behind his decision, saying that it is responsible and moral. “If there is any danger, then no tragedy will occur if women and children leave the city for a few days. Such a step on our part will make things easier for the political echelon and enable the country’s leadership to make reasoned decisions. In any case, we will not take action without the authorization of the army and political echelon.”

The residents of Ramat Gan received the decision with mixed feelings:

Many of them did not understand how they were supposed to last through the extended stay at the camping site. City resident Moshe Bublil actually appreciated Bar’s decision: “In the Gulf War, I went to Jerusalem with my four children. We lived there at hotels for nearly a month, and I had to spend nearly NIS 15,000. This is the most orderly and proper solution for residents who do not have the resources to escape to hotels.”

The IDF is reported to dislike the plan of the Ramat Gan municipality, but sources in the Home Front Command said that “the decision whether to leave is the free choice of the residents.” IDF sources said that the Home Front Command is not connected to the plans of the Ramat Gan municipality. Officials in the Home Front Command stated that they had orderly plans for population evacuation, intended for cases of suspicion of a chemical or biological attack on a specific area.

This piece ran in Yediot Aharonot on September 13, 2002

A Train in Poland Where the Passengers Would Not Get Off

My grandfather, of blessed memory, was an underground fighter, a partisan, in Nazi-occupied Poland during World War II. One of the main objectives of the partisans was the destruction of eastbound train tracks in order to prevent the transport of German troops to the Russian front and of Jews to their internment and ultimate death in Nazi concentration camps.

On one occasion, my grandfather told me, his unit of partisan fighters blew up a railroad bridge and waited in ambush. When the train eventually approached and was forced to stop in order to avoid plummeting into the canyon depths, the partisans charged aboard and killed all of the Nazi troops who were manning the cars. Afterwards, the partisans opened a passenger car from which they had heard the sound of people talking excitedly and crying. Inside was a group of Jews dressed in their finest clothes and grasping suitcases filled with their possessions — as if they were on their way to a long vacation. The Jews on board were shocked and apprehensive about the strange-looking people from the woods who had attacked their train and killed all of the Nazi soldiers, initially refusing to believe that their liberators were Jewish themselves.

After some discussion, it became clear that the Jews in the railroad car were from occupied Belgium. The partisans described what awaited them in the Nazi concentration camps, but the Belgian Jews refused to believe their ears. They protested to the wild Jews from the forest that it was utterly impossible that the train was taking them to their deaths. “After all, the Germans told us that this was an evacuation to the East for military purposes,” they insisted, with a glance at the dark, foreboding Polish woods, “and who would believe that the cosmopolitan Germans would plan such a thing as you are telling us? In fact, the opposite is the case, we have to try and survive under the terms set by the Germans — your way is dangerous and only brings down the fury of the Germans on all the Jews.” The partisans tried to convince them by cajoling, pleading and crying but nothing helped and so they returned to the sanctuary of the forest before the arrival of Nazi reinforcements.

The Belgian Jews waited patiently for the train to be repaired. Then, they continued on their journey eastward.

That story is one of the saddest, most chilling stories from that most sad and chilling period in history. However, more chilling is our failure to learn from those who have come before us. We still, in the words of Elie Wiesel, trust the promises of our friends more than the threats of our enemies.

While it is undeniably true that today’s train, the Arab-Israeli “peace train”, has run off the tracks, there are still those obstinate people who insist on remaining on board until the Arabs come to repair the train and carry all of us, for the sake of peace, of course, to our final destination. When Jewish leaders say that they are waiting for new leadership among the Arabs, they are really saying that they are waiting for a new crew to fix the derailed train. They have no intention of leaving the train and confronting the truth of its ultimate destination.

Often, those Jewish leaders mired in the ideology of Oslo appeasement pose what they deem to be a rhetorical question; “what’s the alternative?” The Belgian Jews in that Polish forest also grappled with “what’s the alternative?” They asked themselves: the woods or the camps? Total defiance or cooperation in an effort to appease our enemies? The answer to those condemned Jews, and to their modern day fellow-travelers now stuck on the “peace train”, has to be the same one given by my grandfather and his unit of partisans: the alternative, my brethren, is to take responsibility for yourselves and to live.

This piece ran on IsraelNationalNews.com on 27 August 2002