Legal Action in France Against Al Aharam – Anti-Semitic Jewish Campaign Faces Litigation

Whoever thinks the French are all hostile towards Israel, can find a certain comfort in the following: a court in Paris is currently carrying out an investigation against the Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram, on suspicion of an anti-Semitic publication. The chief editor of the newspaper, Ibrahim Nafe, has been summoned for questioning before the judge next Friday. The French intervened when the law enforcement authorities were presented with an article published in the newspaper, which also appears in France, with the claim that IDF soldiers kill Palestinians following a ritual injunction, just as their forefathers killed Gentile children to prepare Passover matzas out of their blood. The story, which has caused a furor in Egypt, re-invokes the myth of the Damascus blood libel.

The affair begins with an article published on October 28, 2000 in the Egyptian daily, under the heading “Jewish Matza from the Blood of Arabs.” The article was written by the writer and publicist Adel Hamuda, one of the senior writers in the newspaper and editor of the weekly Sawt al-Umma. These were the days of the Intifada, and about 100 Palestinians had already been killed, including many children.

Hamuda began with a long and compelling description of the Damascus blood libel. One Friday, in February 1840, a Greek cleric by the name of Father Tomas disappeared. The priest, who posted notices throughout the city offering a house for sale, entered the Jewish neighborhood of Damascus and was never seen again. His servant, who went in to search for him, disappeared as well. Tomas was a well known doctor in the city, with ties to the Ottoman Pasha and foreign diplomats. A complaint was filed with the police, and an investigation was launched. Finally, a Jewish barber by the name of Suleiman (Solomon) was arrested. Father Tomas had posted a notice on his shop. After being whipped, Suleiman told the police that the priest had been stabbed to death by Jewish rabbis, whose names he knew.

According to Suleiman’s testimony, the rabbis took Father Tomas to the house of Rabbi Mussa Harari. They lay his neck on a large tub, and spilled his blood into it, while taking care “not to spill a single drop,” in Hamuda’s words. “They then took him from the room where he had been slaughtered to another room, removed his clothes and burnt them. They cut him into pieces, placed the pieces in a sack and brought them to a ditch near the Jewish neighborhood.”

The long article also brings conversations between the investigator and one of the Jews being questioned. “What did you do with his innards?” asked the investigator. “We cut them up, placed them in a sack and threw them in a ditch,” replied the Jew being interrogated. “Did blood drip from the sack?” “No, because we were careful to save every drop of blood. This comes from our customs and the Talmud.” “Why?” asked the investigator. “It is used for matzas.”

The story of the Damascus blood libel was documented by a 19th century French researcher, Charles Lauren. The book was translated into Arabic and published in Cairo in 1898. In his article, the Egyptian journalist refers to the blood libel as a true story. This is not the reason that the investigation was initiated in France, but rather the contemporary conclusions drawn from it.

“What is most interesting,” wrote Hamuda, “is that the rabbis who committed this crime did not feel remorse. The meaning of this appears in the Talmud… According to the Talmud, the Jewish souls are differentiated from all others, being part of God as a son is part of his father. This explains the murder of Father Tomas and his servant, and explains the sights we see on our television screens. Scenes of Israeli occupation soldiers mercilessly killing children, while chewing gum as if they were on an outing, a trip or a journey. Deep inside they are not murdering human beings, but stray animals, and this follows their ritual law dictated by the Talmud.”

In other words, Hamuda is saying: The Jews are commanded by their religion to kill Gentiles, even if they are innocent people. What the Jews of Damascus did in 1840 is similar to what the IDF soldiers are doing today. In both cases, it is murder in heaven’s name. […]

The daily Al-Ahram (“the pyramids”) reaches nearly every corner of Europe and the United States where Arabs live. It is distributed on a daily basis in France. The article on the matza baked with Gentile blood was brought to the attention of the heads of the Jewish community in France, and they reported it to the judicial authorities in Paris. A year and nine months after the publication, an investigation was launched in Paris against the daily newspaper, on suspicion of breaking the law that forbids incitement to hatred and anti-Semitic violence. Last week, the investigative justice Benot Tobino issued a summons for questioning for Ibrahim Nafe, the chief editor of Al-Ahram.

Nafe, one of the senior journalists in Egypt and an associate of President Hosni Mubarak, published a report on the investigation in his newspaper. In a giant article, spread over a full page, Nafe defends Adel Hamuda. In fact, Nafe’s article is a document summarizing the Egyptian position on defamatory publications towards Israel and the Jews. The position stated by the senior editor combines political, social and cultural arguments. Nafe says that the publications in Egypt are no different in essence from the series of statements made by leaders of the Israeli right.

“Everything happening with regard to this affair,” writes Nafe, “is nothing but an action intended to pressure Egypt to change its policy and restrict the freedom of the Egyptian press. We can find on the other side dozens of articles where political and religious leaders in Israel make racist statements about the Arabs.”

Ibrahim Nafe is not alone. The affair is perceived in Egypt as an attack by Israel on Egypt. In a series of official leaflets, parties, journalists and labor unions have expressed support for the newspaper and its editor. Even al-Wafd, the opposition party, came to the defense of the newspaper, a symbol of the Egyptian establishment. “The legal authorities in France,” responded Nuaman Guama, party chairman, “are not authorized to carry out an investigation about what happens in Egypt.” Nafe himself, it can be safely assumed, will not report for questioning in France.

This article ran in Maariv on August 2, 2002

Eight Children without a Father: The Aftermath of the Murder of Rabbi Elimelech Shapiro

Yesterday, at the fresh grave of Rabbi Elimelech Shapira stood his wife Rivka, embracing her eight children: 17-year-old Reut; 15-year-old Ortal; Hadar, 13; Elyashiv, 11; Evyatar, 9; Hillel, 7; Zimrat, 5; and Hananel, 3. They stood and grieved for their father, who was killed by terrorists when he traveled at 3:30 a.m. from his home in the settlement of Peduel in Samaria to a Bible lecture in Bnei Brak.

Rabbi Elimelech Shapira, 43, studied in the hesder yeshiva [a program that combines yeshiva studies with army service] in Kiryat Shmona and studied afterward in a yeshiva in Bnei Brak. Eleven years ago, he moved to Peduel in western Samaria. There he founded the Eretz Tzvi pre-army academy and headed it ever since, along with Rabbi Meir Katz.

About 170 students attend the academy, which is meant to prepare young religious high-school graduates to serve in the army “with their bodies and souls,” through Jewish studies and physical training. Hundreds of young men who studied there serve in army combat units.

But Elimelech Shapira was not only known as a rabbi. No less was he known for his great love for music. He enchanted many with his flute. “He represented all that is good and beautiful in a human being, the opposite of what his murderers represent,” said Yona Goodman, a member of the settlement.

“Rabbi Shapira used to say that we must use our time for study,” they said on the settlement. Therefore, he used to leave Peduel early in the morning for Bnei Brak, to get in a Bible lesson in the yeshiva there, and get back by morning and give his usual lecture in academy in Peduel.

The head of the Settlers Council, Benzi Lieberman, who lives in Peduel, said that Rabbi Shapira was “an admired figure who aspired to excellence and loved the country.” Lieberman said that the murder would only strengthen the Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria and that Peduel and Alei Zahav, between which two settlements runs the road on which Rabbi Shapira was killed, would build two new neighborhoods next month.

Rabbi Shapira was buried last night. “Daddy, my beloved father, I love you,” eulogized his daughter Ortal, 15. “I see all the many people who came here, people Daddy taught all the time. My father is the Messiah; I want you to know that.”

Thousands of people accompanied Rabbi Shapira on his final journey, among them hundreds of soldiers and army officers, graduates of the pre-army academy he headed. At first, the people congregated at the academy building. Dov Shapira, head of the religious council, said: “You went up to heaven in a storm. You were murdered before studying Torah and after immersing in the mikve [ritual bath].” Meir Yehiel, his father, said: “My dear and holy son: the bullets of contemptible terrorists hit you. Not every day does the Heavenly Yeshiva merit to receive a special person like you.”

After the many eulogies, the funeral cortege set out in a long convoy to the Segula cemetery in Petah Tikva. Rivka, his wife, said over the open grave: “I don’t know whether to call you my beloved, my rabbi or my father. Today we return that with which we were entrusted. God gave, and God took away. Elimelech, I love you.”

This article ran in Maariv on July 26th, 2002

Surviving Orphan of the Dickstein Family: “The Terrorist Looked Us in the Eye and Opened Fire”

“Where will we sit shiva”?
“Where will we live?”
“Who will be our adoptive parents?”;

These difficult and heart-rending questions were asked yesterday by the nine surviving Dickstein children who lost their parents and their nine-year-old brother on Friday in the lethal terror attack in the southern Hebron hills.

Yaakov and Hannah Dickstein, both teachers, were the parents of ten children. They moved eight months ago from Jerusalem to the settlement Psagot as part of their desire to contribute to the Jewish settlement enterprise in the territories. On Friday they were making their way to visit their friends at the settlement Maon, traveling with six of their children.

An investigation of the incident suggests that a terror cell composed of what appears to have been four terrorists positioned itself on the side of the road that connects Pnei Hever to the settlements Maon and Carmel. The position the gunmen selected is about two kilometers south of Zif intersection and 500 meters from the village Yatta, to which the terrorists fled. Elazar Leibovich was killed in the first car to pass the gunmen. Leibovich, who was driving the car, sustained mortal injuries from the gunfire, but he succeeded in driving a little further. He died within a short period of time from his injuries.

Immediately afterwards, the Dicksteins came down the road. One of the terrorists opened fire on the car, and the car pulled to a stop. Another terrorist who was hiding on the other side of the road came out of his hiding place and drew near the car. “The terrorist came up to us, looked us in the eye, and began to shoot,” one of the Dickstein girls told the detectives. Mr. Dickstein tried to get out of the car, and was shot dead. Hannah Dickstein and the nine-year-old Shuva-ell were murdered by the terrorist in front of the five other children. Adiel, a baby, sustained light injuries and was treated on the spot, and one of the boys, who is 12-years-old, sustained injuries to his back and arm from shrapnel. He was hospitalized in Hadassah Ein Karem in light to moderate condition.

Rescue workers, IDF troops, and police troops under the command of Samaria and Judea District Commander Shahar Ayalon. The physical evidence at the scene indicates that the terrorists fired 20 bullets before fleeing.

Tanzim took responsibility yesterday for the terror attack. Security officials said that their intelligence indicates that the terrorists are hiding out either in Yatta or in one of the caves in the vicinity. Yesterday the IDF swept Yatta and discovered illegal guns, knives, a large amount of ammunition and a home-made bomb in the Palestinian police station in the town.

“Yaakov and Hannah were optimistic people, with a lot of joy of life and light in their eyes,” said yesterday Hannah Diamant, a family friend. “They built their house in Psagot with all their heart and all their soul and despite all the difficulties.”

Yaakov, who was a teacher in the Netiv Meir yeshiva, was on sabbatical this year which he used to establish a higher education institution in Jerusalem. Hannah taught computers at a girl’s ulpana in Pisgat Zeev and at the Evelina de Rothschild school in Jerusalem.

All of the surviving nine Dickstein children spent the weekend in the hospital along with their injured brother. All nine, including the two-year-old Adiel, know that Mommy, Daddy and Shuva-el will not be coming home.

This article ran in Maariv on July 28th, 2002

Three bodies, Nine Orphans

Three members of the Dickstein family who were killed in Friday’s terror attack in the Hebron hills were laid to rest yesterday. The funeral cortege of Yossi and Hani Dickstein and their son Shuva-el left the Merkaz Harav Yeshiva in Jerusalem for the Psagot cemetery.

“It was clear to the whole family that the funeral would start here, in the study hall where you acquired the spiritual foundations of our home and that it would end in Psagot,” said the oldest son, Zvi Yehuda, 22. “Only last week, Father looked at the home he had built in Psagot and said: We were like dreamers; we now have our portion [Biblical quotes]. You found your place in Psagot and it was clear to us that we would bury you here.”

The nine orphans walked behind the three bodies. Zvi Yehuda began his eulogy with a quote from the penitential prayers. “What words can describe the enormity of this catastrophe?” he asked. “How can we speak in the past tense about the people we loved best? Father, Mother, Shuva-el, suddenly everything is stopped in the middle. But, dear parents, we received a solid education, an education for ideals, and we will continue in your path.”

Zvi Yehuda said that he realized his parents had been killed when he saw their bodies that morning at the funeral, but he was having difficulty assimilating the loss. “What will be with us, the children? You wanted so much to see us married, and now, who will lead us to the marriage canopy? You won’t get to see your grandchildren. Father, Mother, in my name and in the name of all the children, I promise you that we will keep the family united.”

The nine orphans announced that they would continue to live in Psagot, in the home their parents built, where they moved from Jerusalem about seven months ago. “We have no idea how we will go on,” Zvi Yehuda said, “but we will go on. We will go on here, in Psagot, as you taught us.”

This piece also ran in Maariv on July 29th, 2002

Critique of Hansen Op-ed

Mr. Peter Hansen, the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief Works Agency, in a NYT op-ed on July 30, 2002, “Easing Palestine’s Humanitarian Crisis”, and in an IHT op-ed on July 31, 2002, correctly writes that “something must be done for ordinary families in the West Bank and Gaza.

Hansen, however, does not address the question as to whether the UNRWA policy of maintaining Arab refugees “and their descendants” in the squalor of refugee camps – under the premise and promise of the “right of return” to homes and villages that no longer exist, instead of resettling them in humanitarian conditions, is not in itself part of the problem of these “ordinary families”.

All other refugees around the world attended to by the U.N. fall under the mantle of the High Commission of Refugees, which works diligently to see that refugees are resettled (not necessarily in their place of origin) with all due speed. Only Palestinian Arab refugees have been maintained in ostensibly temporary camps for over 50 years. Hansen himself is on record as having said that “this is their whole life.”

This policy has fomented Palestinian unrest and raised expectations in a way that is a definite factor in the rise of terrorism. Astonishingly, Israel was prevented, by a U.N. General Assembly resolution in December 1985, from moving refugees who had fallen under their jurisdiction into permanent housing that had been built for them. So political were the goals of the U.N. that they preferred to see the refugees themselves suffer. And to this day that situation pertains.

Hansen’s statement that UNRWA “is committed to ensuring that its installations remain free of militant activity” stands in contradiction to what UNRWA public affairs spokesmen have told our agency, which is that UNRWA knows full well that the forces of the PLO and Hamas maintain an armed presence in the UNRWA camps throughout the West Bank and Gaza. “Battle for the Holy Land”, aired by PBS in April, 2002, showed arms caches located in UNRWA camps throughout the West Bank. P.A. minister Ghassan Khatib remarked to CNN on February 28th, 2002, that every young man in the UNRWA Balata refugee camp now had his own personal weapon.

Hansen’s statement that “its 22,000 staff members do not allow their political beliefs to interfere with their duties” stands in contradiction to the fact that Hamas openly controls the UNRWA teachers’ union. Hansen’s assertion that UNWRA “has produced school materials promoting tolerance, nonviolent conflict resolution and human rights”, stands in contradiction to what the UNRWA director of curriculum development had told our agency, which is that UNRWA has reinstated the books which Israel had deleted in 1967 because of Israel’s determination that these books promoted hatred and war against the Jewish state. UNWRA schools use texts that have maps of the Middle East with Israel missing.

This fall, 38 donor nations of UNRWA convene to consider the renewal of funding for UNRWA and of the UNRWA mandate itself. It will be instructive to see if the congresses and parliaments of the contributing nations of UNRWA take a closer look at UNRWA at this time.

“Easing the Palestine’s Humanitarian Crisis”

A consensus has emerged in the Middle East, among people of otherwise widely divergent views, on one point: something must be done for ordinary families in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. They face a crisis of such dimensions that it threatens everyone in the region.

Two weeks ago, Ariel Sharon, Israel’s prime minister, telephoned Kofi Annan, the United Nations secretary general, to ask for an international effort to help the Palestinian people. Last Wednesday Daniel Kurtzer, the American ambassador to Israel, calling the situation in the territories “a humanitarian disaster,” urged Israel to lift travel restrictions on Palestinians. And on Friday The New York Times reported on an ongoing study by the United States Agency for International Development that has found dramatically increased malnutrition and anemia among Palestinian children. By Sunday, Prime Minister Sharon had announced an easing of travel and other restrictions and had named Foreign Minister Shimon Peres to coordinate relief for the Palestinians. The United Nations hopes these decisions will be swiftly implemented in such a way that they make a substantive difference to ordinary Palestinians.

Mr. Sharon’s phone call came on a day when Mr. Annan was meeting in New York with his colleagues in the Quartet – Secretary of State Colin Powell, Russia’s foreign minister, Igor Ivanov, and Javier Solana, the European Union’s high representative. They agreed that full humanitarian access would be the fastest way to begin improving the Palestinians’ plight and that the United Nations should lead the humanitarian effort.

The United Nations already has the largest humanitarian operation on the ground in the Middle East, with 10,500 staff members in the West Bank and Gaza alone: the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees. Since 1950, the agency has catered to the basic health, education and welfare needs of refugees from the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and their descendants – some of whom still live in so-called refugee camps, which are townships of two- and three-story buildings, while many others are scattered across the region.

Since September 2000, the agency has also been trying to lessen the humanitarian impact of violence, curfews and closures on the refugees in the West Bank and Gaza. It has greatly increased its provision of food aid: whereas before the strife such aid went to 11,000 refugee families, it is now reaching almost 220,000 families. As the Palestinian economy has stagnated, the demands on agency resources have soared.

Israel has long understood that the relief agency’s work is an important factor in the stability of the large Palestinian population on its doorstep. In 1967, when it took control of the West Bank and Gaza, Israel asked the agency to continue its work there – a responsibility that, without the agency, would have fallen on Israel’s shoulders. More recently, in November 2001, the Israeli delegate to the United Nations General Assembly expressed Israel’s “appreciation for the efforts of UNRWA in providing important services, especially in the fields of health care and education.”

Despite such statements, there have been attacks on the agency by some commentators in Israel and America alleging, wrongly, that the relief agency is not part of the solution to the violence in the region, but is part of the problem.

The agency faces many difficulties in serving such a highly politicized population, even though it does not police or administer the refugee camps (where a third of refugees live). The agency is committed to ensuring that its installations remain free of militant activity and demands that its 22,000 staff members – 99 per cent of whom are Palestinian refugees – do not allow their political beliefs to interfere with their duties. These efforts have brought attacks from Arab commentators (and some in the agency’s staff union) claiming that the agency suppresses freedom of speech.

However, in an environment as polarized as the Middle East, the agency would soon lose all credibility if it allowed its commitment to the norms of justice to be diluted by a fear of criticism, regardless of where it might come from.

The agency is working with its donors to tackle some of the difficulties created by the political landscape. For several years it has produced school materials promoting tolerance, nonviolent conflict resolution and human rights. The agency plans to expand this program with further financial support from the United States, which has long been the most generous backer of Palestinian refugee relief. Such support from the international community is vital if the relief and works agency is to continue to operate apolitically in a politically polarized region – and to relieve the desperate situation of Palestinian refugees.

Peter Hansen is commissioner general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.
This column appeared in the New York Times on July 30,2002, and in the International Herald Tribune on July 31, 2002

Norwegian Labor Party Youth Movement (AUF) Demands that Ariel Sharon and Other Israeli Leaders be put on Trial.

The Norwegian Israel Center (NIS) is a voluntary politically independent documentation and resource center that works at promoting a more balanced view towards Israel, and therefore fights antisemitism. At the same time, we try to build a bridge between Jews and Christians

On 10.07.2002, Mrs. Eva Kristin Hansen, the leader of the Norwegian Labor Party Youth Movement (AUF), called upon the Attorney General of Norway to investigate whether “Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and other Israeli leaders can be put on trial for crimes they committed” (http://norskisraelsenter.no/engl/auf-sharon-vg-engl.htm). Kristin explained that this AUF demand for an indictment comes in light of “…$nbsp;killing of ambulance personnel, occasional destruction of civil targets and the illegal execution of civilians”.

Less than a day after this AUF petition was sent to the court, Norwegian former Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg (Labor) spoke before the AUF and attacked Israel. NIS notes that it was not so long ago – 20.4.2002 -, that Stoltenberg gave a speech attacking Israel, while Nazi Swastikas and other horrible anti-Jewish banners were held up in front of the Norwegian parliament (http://norskisraelsenter.no/engl/ap-stoltenberg-eng.htm). Such symbols are otherwise forbidden for use in demonstrations organized by Neo-Nazis.

NIS is aware of the important position that the AUF has in the political life of Norway, particularly concerning the Norwegian Labor Party. AUF has produced many important leaders of the Labor Party. Naturally, their opinions influence their environment and Norway.

As young AUF members, future central Norwegian Labor Party leaders, called in 1971 for the destruction of Israel: “The qualification for lasting peace must be that Israel cease to exist as a Jewish state”. (As quoted by Haakon Lie, former Secretary General of the Norwegian Labor Party, in his book: Slik Jeg Ser Det – As I See It – part II, p. 132.)

This destruction is what the Labor Party calls “peace”. Former Foreign Minister Bjorn Tore Godal was the leader of the same AUF that formulated this declaration, which shows obvious religious antagonism towards Judaism. Can we trust that Godal was neutral and clean of prejudice while he handled Israel under the Oslo Process?

Since the 1970’s, Norwegian Labor leaders have supported the PLO. The PLO, we remind you, is committed to destroy Israel, a point that did not prevent Norway from awarding it’s leader no less than the Nobel Peace Prize. Torbjoern Jagland, Gro Harlem Brundtland, Jens Stoltenberg and Terje Roed-Larsen have followed the line that supports PLO. NIS finds it difficult to understand how such leaders can contribute to a more peaceful Middle East.

NIS notes that racism is defined as negative discrimination of an ethnic group. Racism against Jews is defined as Jew-hatred, or antisemitism.

NIS is aware that the leadership of the Norwegian Labor Party Youth Movement does not necessarily represent the majority opinion. We therefore warn against labeling the whole Norwegian Labor Party, and all of its daughter organizations, as antisemitic.

NIS is, however, very concerned by the fact that the leadership of the Norwegian Labor Party and its daughter organizations might stimulate and encourage Jew-hatred, which is already well developed in Norway. In 2002, Jews are being harassed, Jewish children are being discriminated against in schools and some of the Jews “feel the earth burning under their feet”.

Therefore, it is not surprising that Jews try to maintain a low profile and, especially, deny any connection to the Jewish state, the target for modern Jew-hatred. Norway has never been a place in which Jews could feel equal and permanently safe, particularly before and during the Holocaust (http://norskisraelsenter.no/index-engl.htm).

This attack by the Labor Party on Israel came only a short time after 1.5.2002, when the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) called upon Norwegians to boycott products produced in the Jewish state, Israel. LO is traditionally controlled by the Labor Party. Therefore, we ask the leader of The Norwegian Labor Party and its Youth Movement branch: If you really care about human rights,…$nbsp;

What have you done about the Syrian and PLO responsibility for the massacre of more than 100,000 Christians in Lebanon between 1974 and 1982? Did you try to save them, or punish those responsible?

Why do you blame the prime minister of the Jewish State for acts committed by Christian phalangists – led by a Syrian agent – as revenge for a continuous Moslem massacre? Why not blame the Christians and Moslems involved?

Have you tried to stop the ongoing massacre of Christians in Sudan? During the past several years, more than 1.5 million Christians have been massacred there. Where have you been? Where are you now?

What will you do to improve the life of millions of Moslem Arabs, suffering from tyranny under every single Arab regime, and especially under the PLO?

Israel, surrounded by Moslem countries to the north, east and south, and the Mediterranean Sea to the west, is fighting daily for its survival. The Arab League established the PLO in 1964 as an umbrella-organization for various Arab groups, with the explicit aim of wiping out Israel as an independent state. This is clearly incorporated into the PLO charter and into the “constitution” of al-Fatah, an organization led by Arafat since 1958. With Israel as an exception, the Moslem Arabs have managed to eradicate any non-Moslem minority in the Middle East. But they still refuse to give up. This is the real background of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

NIS therefore encourages The Norwegian Labor Party Youth Movement to consider a change in its radical line. Please support democracy in the Middle East and fight for equality and human right for Jews, Christians and Moslems in the Arab-occupied Middle East.

New Museum To Honor 1.5 Million Jewish Soldiers Who Fought in WWII. Personal Accounts Sought

As the proprietors of a new museum that will honor the 1.5 million Jewish soldiers who fought in World War II in the armies of more than twenty allied nations and the Jewish brigade. We are seeking records of personal stories of those Jewish veterans who might have albums, diaries, pictures and other memoirs that they may wish to share with our Museum, which will be located at the site of the Armored Corps Memorial site and Museum in the valley of Ayalon on the way to Jerusalem.

The Armored Corps Memorial site and Museum Site commemorates the memories of 4885 fallen soldiers that have fallen in Israel’s war campaign history and it is owned and run by the Armored Corps Association for the purpose of educating youths and young soldiers about the heritage of the Jewish people, the Israel Defense Forces and Armored Corps.

The Armored Corps Association and the Israeli Government have decided on the establishment of “The Museum of the Jewish Soldiers in World War II” that is dedicated solely to the heroic acts and sacrifices of the 1,500,000 Jewish soldiers, partisans and member of the Resistant Movements as part of the Allied Forces during World War II.

The Museum is located next to the only Monument to the Allied Forces in existence and it is designed as an underground bunker.

The Museum will tell the story of WW II, the main events in the War, the role of the Jewish soldiers in the Allied Forces, the legacy of their battles, their acts of heroism and the memory of the 300,000 Jewish soldiers who fell in WWII.

The Museum, which will include a memorial, a multi-dimensional exhibition hall, an auditorium, a research center and a computerized center that will contain for generations to come, details about the Jewish fighter of WWII.

The Museum will be 1400 sq. meters (Apprx. 15,000 sq.ft.) in size including all the required space and functions for the visitors.

The Museum is being designed by a team of experts, headed by the Architects Zalman & Ruth Enav.

The Museum committee which governs all the effort includes among others well-known personalities and experts:

Maj. Gen (Ret.) Chaim Erez – Chairman of the Armored Corps Association (A.C.A.).

Brig. Gen. (Ret.) Menashe Inbar – General Manager of the A.C.A.

Dr. Brig. Gen. (Ret.) Yitzchak Arad (Tolka) – former Chairman of “Yad Vashem” in Jerusalem for 20 years and a former Partisan.

Brig. Gen. (Ret.) Tzvika Cantor – Head of the “Jewish Soldier” project.

Professor Assa Kasher – Philosopher and Educator.

Brig. Gen. (Ret.) Avner Shalev – current Chairman of “Yad Vashem” in Jerusalem

Those who would indeed like to honor the Jewish veterans of World War II may write to us directly:

Brig. Gen (Ret.) Menashe Inbar – General Manager
The Armored Corps Association
D.N. Shimshon 99762

Phone: (+972-8) 925-5268
Fax: (+972-8) 925-5186
E-mail: latrun@ interpage.co.il

TV tapes of PA Awards Ceremony for the Families of Suicide Bombers

At a time when the tragedy of civilian casualties in the middle east is so widely discussed, and at a time when a good portion of world opinion and even Israeli public opinion has criticized the Israeli air raid in Gaza in which 14 Arab civilians were killed, you can imagine, if you would, what the reaction of the world would have been if the Israeli government had conducted an official awards ceremony to honor Israeli pilots for killing Arab civilians…

Well, on Thursday, July 18, 2002, The PA held an official ceremony to honor the families of suicide bombers, with checks in the amount and plaques that were was decorated with a picture of Saddam Hussein in the center of the plaque, buttressed with flags of the PA and Iraq in each corner.

The Palestinian Authority Minister of Communications, Imad Falluci (The Hamas leader who was brought into the PA cabinet as a result of the PA-Hamas coalition accord that was signed in Cairo on December 15, 1995) invited the press to a ceremony in which the families of suicide bombers were each awarded with checks from Saddam Hussein.

The PA spokesman at the ceremony, Mr. Abu Rammi, told the media present that the suicide bombers were the PA’s answer to the “balance of power”.

A film of the ceremony was shown on Palestinian Authority TV, Israel TV and Sky News.

BETA master copies of the Israel TV and Sky News coverage are available from Israel Resource News Agency.

Accounts of Human Suffering Following the July 16, 2002 Emannuel Attack

Emmanuel Terror Attack Aftermath

Yehudit Weinberg: “My baby’s dead, but maybe he saved my life”
Yediot Ahronot (p. 9) by Rivka Freilich — “When we return home we’ll try to expand the family despite everything that happened,” said yesterday Yehudit Weinberg, 22, from her hospital bed in the ICU in the Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikva.

Yehudit, who was eight months pregnant, sustained very serious injuries on Tuesday in the terror attack outside Emmanuel. She was struck by a number of bullets in her legs and hips, and the fetus she was carrying was in danger. She was taken to the hospital and after a long and complicated C-section operation gave birth to a boy. The baby was in distress and was defined as being in critical condition. The doctors at the Schneider Children’s Hospital fought for hours to save the newly born infant’s life, but he succumbed yesterday before dawn.

“After the operation Yehudit wouldn’t stop asking what was with the baby,” Yehudit’s mother, Ahuva Kupilovich recounted yesterday. “We said, ‘not good,’ and that he was in critical condition, and I hoped she would stop asking. In the end she asked if the baby had died. We told it had. She averted her glance. The entire time she still had hope in her eyes that it would be possible to save him, but he was hurt too badly. Hope was ended, and Yehudit said, ‘maybe it will be better for him this way.'”

On Tuesday, immediately after the bus was struck by the initial explosion, Yehudit managed to call her parents and said: “I’m in a terror attack, call an ambulance.” She lay down on the floor of the bus, and then the terrorists’ bullets struck her. Her husband, Zvi Weinberg, said: “I spoke with Yehudit before she got on the bus, and she said that she was running a little late. When I heard there had been a terror attack I called ­ but she didn’t answer. It was hard. But her parents told me that they’d spoken with her and that she was alive, so I calmed down.” Yehudit recounted her experiences: “When I got on the bus I sat down in one seat, but I wasn’t comfortable so I moved. The woman who sat in that seat was killed. When the bullets were flying all around me I lay on the floor and I said the prayer ‘everything is done by His word,’ a prayer that is a blessing. That’s the only thing that passed through my mind, and I had a feeling that I would come out of it. My baby died, but who knows, maybe I was saved by him. During the terror attack I screamed for help because I was pregnant, and they really treated me first. Maybe that was his mission to this world.”

“Everything is still fresh and it’s hard talking about things,” said Zvi. “Just like every couple, we were eager for the baby, and that eagerness was taken away. But anything decreed in heaven is decreed for the best. Yehudit was struck by seven bullets and she survived by a miracle. We now need to regain our strength and to get back to normal life. To try and to be careful, but to continue living.” Yehudit and Zvi have a son, Shalom-Noah, who is 14 months old.

The baby that died yesterday was buried in a ceremony that was attended by Hevra Kadisha [burial society] representatives only. “According to Halacha, there’s no need to say kaddish,” explained Zvi. He said the burial was not complemented by a funeral, and no family members were to attend the ceremony.

Lived for 45 Minutes

Ma’ariv (p. 7) by Eli Berdenstein and Sharon Solomon — He was born in a terror attack — and murdered in a terror attack — without ever even being given a name. Yesterday he was buried in the plot for premature babies at the Segula cemetery in Petah Tikvah.

Yehudit Weinberg, 22, was in her eighth month of pregnancy. She was severely injured in her abdomen during the terror attack on Tuesday and began to lose blood. “I’m pregnant,” she cried to the medics, and they quickly brought her to the Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikvah. There, out of the horror, a son was born in a Caesarean operation. The doctors were forced to operate to try and save the fetus’s life.

The premature baby was taken in mortal condition to the Schneider Children’s Hospital. For 45 minutes the doctors worked to save him, but at 2:00 a.m., they gave up. “The mother lost a lot of blood and the baby suffered from a lack of oxygen,” the director of the premature babies unit, Prof. Leah Sirota, explained. “We couldn’t save him. He was a perfect baby, weighting two kilo and 330 gram. It is so frustrating to lose a baby who had a happy life in front of him. Before he even opened his eyes, he lost his life.”

“Every bullet has an address, and what had to happen happened,” said his mother Yehudit yesterday, still hospitalized in moderate condition, “everything is from the Holy One. I may have been saved because of the pregnancy, because I shouted that I was pregnant and they treated me first.” Yehudit, who has another son a year and two months old, said:

“Now I know that we will try and have more children.”

“I hoped that the baby would be saved” said the father, Zvi, “But God wanted otherwise.” Yehudit’s mother, Ahuva Kupilovich, related that she was the one who told her daughter of her baby’s death. “She seemed to have already understood this by herself, because she picked up that the situation was not good. I hoped that she would stop asking, but she didn’t. She asked if he had died. I said yes. She didn’t say anything, just bowed her head and kept her thoughts to herself.”

“Yehudit was waiting for the child like any mother. But we accept this fate. She was saved thanks to Torah and this makes it easier for Yehudit to accept this loss, the knowledge that nothing happens without a reason,” said the grandmother.

Where is Daddy?

Ma’ariv (p. 10) by Uri Arazi et al. — “Where is Daddy? Where is he?” asked Or Haim Shilon, two and a half, yesterday, over and over. He himself was lightly wounded in Tuesday’s inferno. His sister Sara, nine months old, was killed. His grandmother Zilpa was killed, his mother was wounded and phoned his father Gal to come and help them. The father, 32, arrived at a run, and was shot to death by the terrorists.

Or Haim was hospitalized in Meir Hospital in Kfar Saba, with his sister Galia Ester (Sara’s twin sister). The two were surrounded by love from relatives yesterday, who tried to hide their tears from them. At the same time, the mother, 29, who was moderately wounded by shrapnel all over her body, was taken into surgery at the Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tivka.

After she came out, the doctors told her that she had lost her baby girl, her husband and her mother. Ayelet pulled herself together and phoned her eldest son in the hospital. One relative related: “While talking to her a light came into his eyes. He calmed down and began to take care of his little sister. He gave her Bamba and shared a popsicle with her.” He told photographers standing nearby: “She likes that.”

Later on Chief Rabbi Yisrael Meir Law visited the children. “I’m scared,” Or Haim told him. “you’re a good boy, don’t be scared,” the rabbi replied.

At the same time the children’s grandfather, Moshe Mashiah Kashi, 72, of Givatayim, prepared for the funeral of his wife Zilpa. He told family and friends how he took Zilpa to the Bnei Brak bus station, where the 67-year-old woman got on the bus of death, along with her daughter and grandchildren. “She was always visiting the children. She was scared of nothing,” Mashiah said, who also related that five years ago malignant growths were found in Zilpa’s body, but that she had overcome the illness.

Hundreds attended the funeral in Yarkon cemetery. But her daughter Ayelet could not come, because of her injury. “Why have you left me,” Zilpa’s husband cried, holding on to her body, “why did you leave me?”

The funeral of Gal Shilon and of Sara Shilon will take place today. Yesterday Gal’s parents, Yaakov and Sylvia, cut short an organized tour of Russia and returned home. The father, Yaakov, is a registered nurse and responsible for the project of rehabilitating IDF injured; mother Sylvia has a beauty parlor in Ramat Ilan. Ten years ago they lost another son, Nimrod, when he was 17. A relative related that Sylvia did not want to go overseas and had a feeling that something bad would happen. Two weeks ago she told her daughter Ravital, that she dreamed that Gal was being shot and killed.

Gal served in the Air Force in an anti-aircraft unit, studied business administration and at the same time studied for a civilian pilot’s license while working for an airline in Canada. When he returned to Israel a few years ago, he began to come closer to religion, after an aerial exercise in which he was almost killed. Three years ago he met Ayelet through a match.

The two married, and a year ago moved to Emmanuel. His sister Ravital said yesterday: “I didn’t think my brother was killed in the terror attack since he wasn’t on the bus. I phoned him but he didn’t answer, so I phoned Ayelet’s cellphone. A Magen David Adom medic answered me and refused to give details, only asked me to come to the hospital, where I heard. Gal was dead.”