Recognising Palestinian state would destabilise international law, Starmer told

Sir Keir Starmer has been warned that recognising a Palestinian state would “destabilise” the international legal order.

Malcolm Shaw KC, a leading lawyer, said that the recognition plan “would create a troublesome precedent and could well challenge and ultimately destabilise an international system founded upon a common understanding of what it is to be a state”.

The fresh legal opinion, seen by The Telegraph, was circulated to the Prime Minister, Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, and dozens of influential Labour MPs.

It was commissioned by Lord Mendelsohn, the Labour peer, in response to Sir Keir’s decision to recognise a State of Palestine in September unless Israel meets certain conditions.

The warning comes after Hamas made it clear it will not disarm unless an independent Palestinian state is established.

The militant group took the step of issuing a statement “in response to media reports quoting US envoy Steve Witkoff, claiming [Hamas] has shown willingness to disarm”.

It said: “We reaffirm that resistance and its arms are a legitimate national and legal right as long as the occupation continues.

“This right is recognised by international laws and norms, and it cannot be relinquished except through the full restoration of our national rights – first and foremost, the establishment of an independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.”

Hamas added that Mr Witkoff’s trip on Friday to a Gaza aid distribution site was “designed to mislead public opinion, polish the image of the occupation, and provide it with political cover for its starvation campaign and continued systematic killing of defenceless children and civilians in the Gaza Strip”.

Mr Shaw’s legal opinion says the Prime Minister’s plan to recognise the state of Palestine is “premature and may have unintended consequences” and that it “confuses and distorts” any attempt at a peaceful two-state solution.

‘A prize for precipitating war’

He describes Sir Keir’s decision to make statehood dependent on the behaviour of Israel, a “third country”, as “remarkable”.

“This is exceptional and, frankly, not in keeping with the tenor of the relevant international principles,” he wrote.

“Recognition at the current time will be seen as a prize for precipitating the war on Oct 7 2023 with its attendant rapes and massacres.”

Mr Shaw also argues that the Palestinian territories “do not currently satisfy” the criteria for a state.

Some 40 peers warned this week that recognising Palestine in the process set out by the Prime Minister would be illegal. They included Lord Pannick KC and Lady Deech, both respected lawyers and patrons of UK Lawyers for Israel, an association of British lawyers who are supportive of Israel.

Lord Hermer is understood to have disagreed with their arguments and dismissed their claim.

But Mr Shaw’s opinion could pile further pressure on the Government to reconsider its legal position with regards to recognition.

He further argues that since both Israel and the Palestinian territories are still bound by the Oslo Accords, the agreement that remains the legal framework that governs the relationship between Israel and the Palestinians, proper recognition at this time is not possible.

Mr Shaw, who is the author of a standard legal textbook on international law, is currently representing Israel in its International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against South Africa, which argued that Israeli forces had committed genocidal acts in Gaza.

While Sir Keir has always agreed to the principle of recognising a Palestinian state at some point, he was reluctant to do so until his surprise announcement this week.

The Prime Minister appears to have been influenced by a number of factors, including the worsening starvation crisis in Gaza, pressure from international allies such as Emmanuel Macron, and increasingly vocal calls for immediate recognition from his own MPs.

The setting up of a rival Left-wing political party under Jeremy Corbyn, which calls for an independent Palestinian state, may have also put pressure on Sir Keir to act.

On Saturday, protesters from the activist group Youth Demand blocked roads in the Holland Park and King’s Cross areas of London as they called for an immediate British trade embargo on Israel.

On Thursday, Labour MPs supportive of Israel reportedly clashed with Jonathan Powell, Sir Keir’s national security adviser, in a meeting about the recognition announcement.

10 dilemmas posed by a proposed Palestinian state : 10 questions which journalists can ask.

  1. Encirclement: Would a proposed state of Palestine not swallow up Jordan, most of whose population is Palestinian, leaving Israel with a hostile state from the Iraqi border to the Mediterranean Sea, with a corridor across the Negev between Gaza to Hebron?
  2. Israeli Arabs: Would the Arabs of the Galilee and the Negev not sue to join the Palestinian Arab state and then demand the fulfillment of UN Resolution 181 – an Israeli withdrawal to the 1947 borders (evacuation of Nahariya, Acre, Nazareth, Jaffa, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Kiryat Gat, and Beersheba)?
  3. Terror: Would a new Palestinian Arab entity disband terrorist organizations? We asked this question before the Oslo process imported the PLO in 1993, which has never renounced terrorism or violence as a means to liberate all of Palestine
  4. Armament: Why would there be any expectation that a sovereign Palestine be demilitarized, since all nation states maintain an armed force as an integral aspect of their new nation?
  5. Refugees: How would Israel deal with expectations of the Arab countries and UNRWA residents who continue to demand that Israel must absorb descendants of Arab refugees and thereby displace thousands of Israelis from places like Haifa, Safed, and Jaffa, and 80 kibbutzim which rest on the property of Arab villages where Arabs left in 1948?
  6. Air space: Would the Israeli Air Force be forbidden to fly over a new Palestinian Arab state?
  7. Alliances: What would prevent a Palestinian state from making military deals with countries still at war with Israel?
  8. Water: Would a sovereign Palestine not carry out pirate drilling, and threaten the mountain aquifer of Judea and Samaria?
  9. Jewish sovereignty: Would the momentum for a Palestinian Arab state not erase the momentum of the right of the Jews to the Land of Israel in international consciousness?
  10. Loss of independence: Would Israel not become a subject to the sponsors of a Palestinian Arab state – today, known as the Quartet – the US, EU, UN, and Russia?

All this leads to questions that Middle East policymakers should ask about a proposed Palestinian state:

  1. Will you ask the Palestinians to clearly recognize the Jewish state of Israel?
  2. Will you demand that the Palestinians finally ratify the Declaration of Principles for Peace signed at the White House in 1993?
  3. Will you demand that the Palestinians cancel the PLO charter from 1964 that calls for the extermination of the Jewish state?
  4. Will you demand that the Palestinians cancel their unprecedented law from 2015 which assures a salary for life for anyone who murders a Jew?
  5. Will you demand cancellation of the new PA and UNRWA school curriculum, based on jihad, martyrdom, and “right of return by force of arms”?
  6. Will you demand the removal of weapons from PA and UNRWA schools?
  7. Will you insist that UNRWA dismiss employees affiliated with Hamas, Islamic Jihad, or Fatah terror organizations?
  8. Will you introduce UNHCR standards to advance resettlement of fourth- and fifth-generation refugees from the 1948 war who have spent seven decades relegated to refugee status? Current UNRWA policy is that any Arab refugee resettlement would interfere with a purported “right of return” to pre-1948 Arab localities.
  9. Will you demand an audit of donor funds that emanate from 68 nations for the PA and UNRWA, with little transparency?
  10. Given the active participation of the Palestine Security Services (PSS) in the current war, will you demand that the US cease its support of the PSS?

Qatar’s Financial Influence on U.S. Higher Education Sparks Concern Over Islamist and Anti-Israel Agendas

A comprehensive report released by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) has intensified scrutiny over Qatar’s pervasive financial footprint in American higher education, raising alarms about the extent to which the Gulf state is leveraging its wealth to promote extremist, Islamist, and anti-Israel ideologies within U.S. academic institutions. The findings, which have been prominently highlighted in a report that appeared at VIN News on Monday shine a spotlight on growing concerns among lawmakers, education experts, and national security analysts regarding the long-term implications of foreign funding on American campuses.

Natalie Ecanow, a senior research analyst at FDD, testified before the Committee for Homeland Affairs, Public Safety, and Veteran’s Affairs, warning that Qatar’s financial reach into American colleges and universities has placed it at the top tier of foreign donors—outpacing even global heavyweights such as China and Saudi Arabia. According to the information provided in the VIN News report, Ecanow described Qatar’s influence as part of a “spending spree” designed not merely for prestige, but as a strategic effort to inject hostile ideologies into American academic discourse and even influence K-12 curricula.

Citing federal disclosure data, VIN News reported that Qatar has funneled approximately $6.25 billion into American higher education institutions since 2001. However, experts like Ecanow believe the true figure is likely much higher due to widespread underreporting by recipient institutions — a finding corroborated by investigations launched during the previous Trump administration. These investigations uncovered some $6.5 billion in previously undisclosed foreign funds, a significant portion of which came from Qatar.

The challenge, according to the VIN News report, is twofold. First, universities accepting large sums from foreign donors often fail to comply with federal reporting requirements, leading to an incomplete public record of foreign influence. Second, Qatar has actively sought to conceal its financial dealings, going so far as to file a lawsuit to block the state of Texas from releasing funding records related to Texas A&M University. A Texas judge ultimately mandated the disclosure of these documents, revealing nearly half a billion dollars in grants and contracts awarded by Qatar to the institution.

Qatar’s ability to wield soft power through its immense financial resources stems from its global gas wealth, derived from controlling approximately 11 percent of the world’s natural gas reserves. Despite having a native population of just 330,000, Qatar has positioned itself as a major player on the world stage, using its economic leverage to enhance its image abroad while simultaneously advancing ideological agendas. This dual strategy allows Qatar to maintain strong bilateral ties with the United States while covertly supporting extremist organizations, including Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood — entities with well-documented histories of anti-Israel and anti-Western rhetoric.

Further highlighting the ideological reach of Qatari influence, VIN News reported on a 2024 conference hosted at Georgetown University’s Doha campus, a direct beneficiary of Qatari funding. The event, titled “The Future of Gaza,” featured a former Al Jazeera executive notorious for publicly applauding Hamas’s brutal October 7 massacre of Israeli civilians. The speaker had previously delivered a laudatory eulogy for Yusuf al-Qaradawi, a Muslim Brotherhood-aligned cleric infamous for endorsing suicide bombings against Israelis. Such incidents exemplify the type of extremist narratives that Qatari-funded institutions may amplify, either directly or by offering platforms to individuals with deeply controversial views.

Qatar’s influence has a broader institutional impact as well. Universities that receive substantial financial support from foreign governments such as Qatar are increasingly less reliant on traditional alumni donor bases. This shift reduces their accountability to alumni networks and potentially diminishes the influence of stakeholders who might otherwise advocate against rising antisemitism on campus. The implications are particularly concerning given Qatar’s public positions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Doha has consistently placed blame solely on Israel for the Gaza conflict, refused to hold Hamas accountable for its terrorist activities, and backed Islamist factions opposed to Western democratic values.

According to the information in the VIN News report, these dynamics are not merely theoretical concerns but are already manifesting in tangible ways on U.S. campuses. By embedding itself within the financial fabric of American higher education, Qatar gains a subtle yet significant foothold in shaping academic discourse, faculty research priorities, and institutional policies—especially regarding Middle East studies and Israel-related topics.

Moreover, as the VIN News report pointed out, Qatar’s global influence operation extends beyond higher education. The Gulf state owns Al Jazeera, a media outlet widely criticized for broadcasting anti-Israel propaganda and providing sympathetic coverage of Islamist movements. By aligning its media and educational outreach, Qatar effectively amplifies its ideological messages across multiple platforms, a strategy that the VIN News report described as both sophisticated and deeply concerning for proponents of academic freedom and democratic values.

The scrutiny brought to light by the FDD report has sparked calls among policymakers for stricter oversight of foreign donations to U.S. educational institutions. Critics argue that lax enforcement of disclosure requirements, coupled with universities’ willingness to accept large sums from questionable sources, creates an environment ripe for foreign influence. The revelations about Qatar’s funding activities are expected to fuel legislative discussions about tightening transparency laws and imposing penalties for noncompliance.

While Qatar publicly maintains a cooperative relationship with the United States, its financial support for extremist organizations and its promotion of Islamist ideologies stand in stark contrast to the values espoused by American democratic institutions. As VIN News has reported, the dichotomy between Qatar’s official diplomatic posture and its behind-the-scenes activities illustrates the complexity of its international engagements.

The findings of the FDD report serve as a critical reminder of the importance of vigilance in protecting American academic institutions from covert ideological influence. The case of Qatar’s involvement in U.S. higher education highlights the urgent need for greater transparency, stricter regulatory oversight, and a renewed commitment to safeguarding the integrity of American educational and cultural institutions.

Perfidious

This one word encompasses several meanings applicable to the situation being faced today by Israel and Jews worldwide.

Michael Kuttner

Synonyms include treacherous, duplicitous, deceitful, false, untrue, dishonest, and two-faced.

Take your pick because any one of them more than adequately describes politicians, social influencers and the media and their orchestrated orgy of hate and disinformation.

There has not been such a fetid frenzy since the heady days of the pre-Shoah era. Today’s eruption of vile bile is eerily reminiscent of the blood-curdling libels of the Middle Ages when temporal rulers and ecclesiastical authorities combined to accuse the Jews of deicide and child murders.

It has always been a puzzle for good people to understand how the most outrageous accusations against Jews could gain such traction among supposedly educated and cultured sectors of society.

The answer, in fact, is very simple.

A relentless and constant torrent of poisonous lies and accusations is the most effective means to influence the masses. When the targets are Jews, the noxious seeds of hate germinate spontaneously.

I remember my mother and other German refugees recounting their experiences during the years leading up to the Shoah. They remembered how school friends with whom they had socialised for years suddenly wanted to have nothing to do with them. In 1933, Jewish children found that those they had imagined were lifelong friends had cut off all contact. From one day to the next, they were ostracised, vilified and abused. Called “dirty Jews”, German schoolchildren faced a bewildering reality.

The trauma these children suffered was shared by their parents. Many considered themselves loyal Germans and well integrated into German society. They had little understanding of how years of delegitimisation caused this catastrophic situation.

Today, we should know better, but have the lessons of the recent past been truly learnt?

Last week in Melbourne, students from Mount Scopus College visited a museum. They were confronted there by older pupils from a non-Jewish school who verbally abused them with the same “dirty Jew” slurs, among other unmentionable phrases.

What precipitated this onslaught from students who, in most cases, had most probably never had a Jewish friend and do not have the slightest idea what Judaism is all about?

The answer, of course, is very simple.

Thanks to a relentless campaign against Israel in the media, these students have absorbed a negative and toxic understanding of Jews. As has been proven, it does not take very much for this incitement to morph into hate for Jews. Social media and peer pressure contribute equally to brainwashing receptive minds.

Several troubling questions must be asked.

What did these non-Jewish abusers learn at their school about Jews and Israel?

Did the teachers accompanying those pupils make any real effort to stop and condemn this outbreak of intolerance?

How many of these abusive pupils picked up their shameful attitudes from their parents or home environment?

Apart from horrified shock, what steps are being taken to hold those responsible accountable?

Politicians, groups and the media who disseminate the most outrageous lies about Israel cannot hide from the inevitable fallout of their rhetoric and reporting.

Jewish students must be provided with sufficient knowledge and the ability to counter and cope with the tsunami of disinformation now flooding social outlets.

Those adults who still live in denial and believe the situation is all overblown and exaggerated need to take a long hard look at the past and wake up to the realization that inaction leads to disaster.

The warping of young minds is already well underway.

In a recent survey in the United Kingdom, 21% of young Britons say that Israel does not have the right to exist.

This comes hard on the heels of a US survey which revealed that half of young Americans support Hamas.

How many of them were part of the 20% of Jews who voted for the Democratic anti-Israel candidate for the forthcoming New York mayoral elections?

A recent American podcast illustrates the extent to which ignorance and the drip feed of lies can produce the most outrageous outbursts about Jews. The eight young participants claimed that “Jewish people caused the Holocaust and therefore they should themselves be eliminated.” This assertion was followed by accusations of Jewish conspiracies as the reason for problems in the USA.

The moderator did nothing to shut them down or challenge them in any way. If this example of the up-and-coming generation of Americans is anything to go by, then the future for Jews in that country is indeed bleak.

One has only to witness the chaos at US universities and the uncontrolled torrents of anti-Israel/Zionist bile to realise that a lava flow of Jew hate is waiting to erupt. The spectacle of Jewish Democratic politicians embracing and tolerating these manifestations is indicative of a deep malaise in the American Jewish community.

Jewish celebrities who suddenly discover their hitherto latent ethnicity and condemn Israel from the supposed safety of Hollywood and London are embraced by a media salivating at the prospect of disaffected “stars.” This week, Miriam Margolyes compared Israel and Israelis to Nazis, and the journalists were euphoric.

Politicians distort historical facts with gay abandon, and many communal spokespersons let them get away with it.

Australian PM Albanese stated that his country was proud to support the establishment of Israel in 1948 and two States. Presumably, he was referring to the 1947 UN partition plan. Glaringly omitted, of course, was the fact that the Arab representatives (Palestinian fake nationality not yet having been invented) rejected the very notion of a two-state solution. Albanese and his supporters deliberately erase this inconvenient truth and gloss over the 80 years of terrorism against the Jewish State.

The perfidious British, in direct contradiction to the Mandate provisions and the San Remo agreement, handed the territory intended for Jewish settlement to their Hashemite friends. Starmer, Macron, Albanese and others want to hand over the remaining strategic heartland of Israel to a terror-supporting entity.

Shamefully, some communal groups endorse this lethal plan. They equivocate by saying the time is not right, thus, in effect, giving a wink and a nod to its implementation.

What they do not comprehend is that the same jihadists who are waiting in the wings to murder and annihilate Jewish sovereignty are also rapidly entrenching themselves in democratic countries.

The recent horrific massacres of Syrian Druze by local jihadists highlight the fate that Israeli Jews would face if “Palestine” were ever established in Judea and Samaria. Israel was the only country that came to the aid of the beleaguered Druze minority, and even then, it was condemned for doing so. The international community, showing that it has learnt nothing from its shameful silence during the Shoah, remained conspicuous by its indifference.

University mobs and the usual “useful idiots” were nowhere to be seen or heard. Most media outlets contributed to a mass amnesia and instead concentrated their venom against the only nation that tried to defend the Syrian Druze from complete annihilation.

These daily doses of lies, slander, delegitimisation and hate are producing a harvest of poisonous fruit.

Dismissing and minimising these looming threats is a failure.

The only strategy is to stand up, speak up, demolish untruths and strengthen Jewish knowledge and identity.

As we commemorate Tisha B’Av and all the calamitous events which have occurred over the millennia, we should resolve to never again be at the mercy of those who prefer to appease Jew haters.

Israel, Jews and Peace in Schoolbooks and Teachers’ Guides Used in UNRWA Schools in Judea, Samaria, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip

Dr. Arnon Groiss has submitted a paper from our agency for publication by the Meir Amit intelligence and terrorism information center which documents that the Palestinian Authority, which now refers to itself as the State of Palestine, which has established a new school system which negates the very idea of a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Rather, it calls for a violent struggle for the liberation of Palestine – including Israel’s pre-1967 territories – with insinuated genocidal intentions. Therefore, any illusion that the forthcoming UN conference on Palestine addresses a two state solution represents any semblance of a two state solution represents the great lie of the 21st century.

is there an academic ready to  welcome Dr. Gross to present his objective research in a well publicized public forum?

 

UK: Natasha Hausdorff discusses proposed UK recognition of a Palestinian State on Talk TV

Natasha Hausdorff, UKLFI Charitable Trust Legal Director, discusses ‎the validity and consequences of proposed UK recognition of a Palestinian State on Talk TV, interviewed by Ian Collins‎.

 

Senior Hamas official: We were surprised by Israel’s decision to abandon negotiations

Masked Hamas militants hold weapons during a protest against Israel's attacks on the Gaza Strip, in Gaza City, Monday, March 3, 2008. In the early hours of Monday, Palestinians counted nine separate Israeli airstrikes on weapons manufacturing and storage facilities, a Hamas headquarters and groups of gunmen, all over Gaza. Five Palestinians were killed in the strikes, all of them Hamas militants, Hamas said. (AP Photo/Khalil Hamra) *** Local Caption *** ??? ??????

Ghazi Hamad, a member of Hamas’s political bureau and a participant in its negotiation team, criticized US President Donald Trump following his accusations that Hamas is obstructing a hostage release deal and his public support for the organization’s elimination.

In an interview with Al-Araby, Hamad claimed Hamas presented a “positive and realistic” position during the Doha talks, expressing readiness for an agreement that would include humanitarian aid and guarantees for continued negotiations following a 60-day ceasefire. He said Trump’s remarks were “baseless” and even surprised mediators from Qatar and Egypt.

Hamad accused Israel of attempting to impose terms it failed to secure militarily, particularly control over aid distribution in Gaza. He said Hamas insisted that aid be managed by neutral international bodies, such as the UN, the Palestinian Red Crescent, and other organizations active in Gaza prior to March.

According to Hamad, Israel demanded control over roughly 40% of the Gaza Strip, including the humanitarian city and the Morag Corridor – territories he claimed would allow Israel to resume fighting at a later stage. He said Hamas, in contrast, sought assurances to prevent renewed hostilities, the withdrawal of IDF forces, and the removal of aid distribution centers.

Hamad also revealed that Hamas presented “keys” for a prisoner exchange deal involving the release of Israeli hostages in return for Palestinian Arab prisoners, likely including those connected to the October 7 terror attacks.

Mamdani Backgrounder

‘Capitalism Is Theft’: I Followed Zohran Mamdani’s Internet Trail

More than 16,000 tweets in 18 years reveal a vision far more revolutionary than the candidate’s polished campaign bio.

07.23.25

I read all 16,100 tweets that Zohran Mamdani has ever posted.

Why? Because the Democratic front-runner for New York City mayor sounds polished now—but he didn’t start that way.

If he wins in November, Mamdani, 33, would become the city’s first digital-native mayor.

But long before he was a rising political star, Mamdani was “Young Cardamom,” “TreyDadday,” and “bayaye27,” as he documented his life across the web in unfiltered bursts. What I saw in reading all of his posts, which span 18 years and multiple personas, is a portrait of a man with a revolutionary vision for America. One that hasn’t faded.

Mamdani’s internet trail reveals far more than a veneered candidate biography on a website ever could. In tweet after tweet, he calls for the end of the free market, for defunding the police, and for dismantling the prison system, which he describes as the “carceral state.” He champions communism (at least in one jokey photo), stans anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour, calls cops “haram” (the Arabic term for forbidden under Islamic law), and insists that New York should look more like socialist Vienna. As Mamdani moves more into general-election mode as the front-runner to beat—wearing suits, moderating his message, and cozying up to the business community—his digital past offers a rare glimpse of the ideology beneath the polish.

The Mamdani campaign did not respond to my requests for comment. But here is the real Mamdani, based on my review of his internet past:

“Capitalism is theft.”

That is how Mamdani put it in 2020, when he was a first-time candidate and self-described socialist running for New York’s state assembly in Queens. He posted a PDF from the Marxists Internet Archive, used hashtags like #TaxTheRich and #CancelRent, and referred to supporters not as voters but “comrades.”

This wasn’t just talk. He called for a “political revolution,” and argued that socialism wasn’t “some utopian fantasy” but the “only pragmatic response to the crises we face.” He praised Vienna’s public housing model—where roughly 60 percent of residents live in government-owned apartments—and said New York should emulate it. “We want to move away from a situation where most people access housing by purchasing it on the market,” he wrote, “[and] toward a situation where the state guarantees high-quality housing to all.”

‘Capitalism Is Theft’: I Followed Zohran Mamdani’s Internet Trail

But Vienna’s housing system, widely cited by Mamdani, has been plagued by reports of rising rents, deteriorating buildings, and aging units without basic amenities like private bathrooms or central heating.

That didn’t dull his enthusiasm. He comes from a posh family—his mother, award-winning director Mira Nair, sold her Chelsea loft for $1.45 million in 2019—but Mamdani treats wealth itself as a form of theft. “Socialism doesn’t mean stealing money from the rich,” he wrote on X in 2020. “It means taking back money the rich stole from everyone else.” In another post: “Taxation isn’t theft. Capitalism is.”

He hasn’t disavowed those views. When asked on CNN last month whether he liked capitalism, Mamdani smiled. “No, I have many critiques of capitalism,” he said.

If elected, Mamdani plans to expand the public sector significantly—making all bus rides free, opening a city-run grocery store in every borough, and offering universal childcare.

“We don’t just need more accountability. We need fewer police.”

That’s what Mamdani tweeted in the summer of 2020, at the height of the George Floyd protests. He wasn’t subtle. “Defund the NYPD,” he wrote during a week of violent unrest across the country. A month later, he laid out a four-point plan to begin doing just that: freeze hiring, cancel overtime, halt equipment purchases, and slash $1 billion from the NYPD’s budget over four years—“to start,” he added.

‘Capitalism Is Theft’: I Followed Zohran Mamdani’s Internet Trail

In December 2020, he took his criticism a step further, calling the police force “haram.” Since then, and especially since Mamdani launched his mayoral campaign, his tone has shifted. On the debate stage, he said that “police have a critical role to play in public safety.” His platform no longer includes budget cuts. Instead, he proposes creating a new Department of Community Safety to handle gun violence and severe mental illness.

“May the light guide us to freedom, justice, and equality for all.”

That was Mamdani’s Hanukkah post in 2023. He often posts greetings for most major religious holidays—but only in his messages to Jews does he pair them with progressive political refrains. His Passover message in 2020 struck a similar note, ending with the activist slogan “until all of us are free.”

A few days earlier, he celebrated an endorsement from The Jewish Vote—a group affiliated with Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, which later described the October 7 massacre by Hamas as “neither justifiable nor unprovoked.” At the time, Mamdani used the endorsement to affirm his opposition to antisemitism—but only while also condemning Islamophobia and condoning the struggle for “collective liberation.” When he has posted about Muslim holidays or his visits to various mosques, no such equivocation appears.

When Israel suffered the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, his first reaction was not to condemn the terrorists. In his statement on the Hamas attack, released October 8, 2023, Mamdani didn’t mention the word Hamas once. There was no reference to the Israeli women who were raped, the children who were kidnapped, or the festivalgoers who were gunned down.

He comes from a posh family—his mother, award-winning director Mira Nair, sold her Chelsea loft for $1.45 million in 2019—but Mamdani treats wealth itself as a form of theft.

Instead, Mamdani criticized Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and accused Israeli lawmakers of calling for “another Nakba.” A few days later, Mamdani claimed that Palestinians were on “the brink of genocide,” even though Israel had not begun its ground invasion. He was arrested for disorderly conduct at an anti-Israel demonstration.

Mamdani also amplified disputed or false claims about the war. He repeated the allegation that Israel bombed the Al-Ahli hospital in Gaza, a narrative that international investigators have largely debunked. He reposted a claim that pro-Israel students had sprayed chemical weapons on anti-Israel demonstrators at Columbia University. It turned out to be fart spray.

He called Reps. Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib his heroes.

Mamdani has invoked Omar and Tlaib—two progressive lawmakers known for their opposition to Israel—nearly a dozen times. In most instances, he pointed to them as examples of the kind of leadership he aimed to bring to Queens.

“Growing up, I watched congressmen call for hearings on the radicalization of Muslims,” he wrote on X. “Today, I get to watch @IlhanMN & @RashidaTlaib grill corporate CEOs in hearings on behalf of working people.”

Then, before linking to his donation site, he added: “Help us follow in their footsteps.”

‘Capitalism Is Theft’: I Followed Zohran Mamdani’s Internet Trail

In another post, he wrote that Tlaib “proves another world is possible.” He paired it with the flag of the United Arab Emirates instead of Palestine. A commenter corrected him. Mamdani replied with a face-palm emoji.

Meet bayaye27.

That was Mamdani’s Instagram handle from 2015 to 2019, while he was building a rap career in Uganda. In Luganda, one of the major languages spoken in Uganda, bayaye loosely translates to thug. His 115 posts chronicled everything from CD hustling to coverage in the local press. In one selfie at a barber shop, he teased his upcoming look: “About to get that Bollywood villain mustache.”

At the top of the account, one image stood out: his profile picture, of a man in a red T-shirt with one word written across the chest: COMMUNIST. The man was not Mamdani—but Lil Wayne, clipped from a still of Jay Sean’s 2009 “Down” music video. In it, Wayne raps the lyrics “Honestly, I’m down like the economy” while pointing to the block letters on the T-shirt.

This wasn’t Mamdani’s only online alter ego. In college, he went by “TreyDadday” on Facebook. As a rapper, he adopted the stage name “Young Cardamom,” releasing tracks like “#1 Spice” and touring Kampala with his childhood friend turned producer Hussein Abdul Bar. Years later, he and Hussein referred to themselves on Instagram as “Buziga boys”—a nod to the ritzy neighborhood in Kampala where they both grew up, with a view of Lake Victoria and homes that today sell for more than $1 million.

“We believe in collective liberation.” 

That is a line from Mamdani’s proposal, “A Platform for Socialist Feminism,” a nearly 2,000-word plan that he released in April 2020, just weeks into the Covid-19 pandemic. While Republican-led states moved to restrict abortion access, Mamdani went in the opposite direction. His plan called for “free abortion on demand,” contraception access for illegal immigrants, and a total overhaul of the state’s prostitution laws.

Under capitalism, he wrote, gender equality was “impossible.” The only way forward, in his view, was to decriminalize “both the buying and selling of consensual sex.” In a section titled “Protect Sex Workers and End Violence Against Women and Nonbinary People,” Mamdani rejected the so-called Nordic Model, which makes it illegal to buy sex, but not to sell it. He called that model “untenable.”

‘Capitalism Is Theft’: I Followed Zohran Mamdani’s Internet Trail

“This model discriminates against women who have few other options to earn a living besides sex work,” he argued. “Sex workers can sell sex, but there’s no one to buy it. This disproportionately impacts trans women, migrant women, and street-based workers.”

Mamdani’s proposal didn’t gain much attention at the time. But in retrospect, it is striking—especially since residents in many parts of Queens are pushing back against the open sex trade. In Corona, which borders his state assembly district, residents have been pushing the city to clean up their streets. The majority of those residents are Hispanic. Since launching his mayoral campaign, Mamdani hasn’t highlighted the issue.

“I promised things that were simply impossible.”

That’s how Mamdani described his campaign platform—not for state assembly or mayor, but for vice president of the student council at the Bronx High School of Science. He told the story in two separate interviews with his high-school friend Daniel Kisslinger, years before Mamdani entered formal politics. In both interviews, Mamdani laughed about the promises he made: fresh juice every morning from locally sourced fruits, abolishing the school’s mandatory gym requirement, and a total overhaul of detention policies.

“I served 44 dean’s detentions by the time of my graduation,” he told Kisslinger in 2020.

“You were a detention abolitionist,” Kisslinger joked.

He lost that election—“Moon Jeong whooped my ass,” he admitted—but the story stuck. It painted a picture of a candidate with big ideas and a habit of making promises he couldn’t keep.

‘Capitalism Is Theft’: I Followed Zohran Mamdani’s Internet Trail

In another interview, this time with a Ugandan media outlet in 2016, Mamdani made a different kind of claim: that he had lived in Uganda his whole life. “While Uganda is my birthplace and home, I don’t have anything besides Kampala,” he said. “I’ve lived in Buziga since birth.”

That isn’t true. His official state assembly biography says that Mamdani moved to New York at the age of 7. He attended a private elementary school on the Upper West Side, then went on to Bronx Science and Bowdoin College, a liberal-arts school that has a $93,800 annual sticker price. By the time he gave that interview, he had spent more years in America than in Uganda.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by The Free Press (@thefreepress)

Credit:@thefreepress and @olivia_reingold

Credit”;Torah News

Transparently disgraceful

There are times when a situation is so clearly disgraceful that silence is no longer an honest option.

We are currently experiencing such times, both internally in Israel and worldwide in Diaspora communities.

It certainly is not appropriate to remain silent in the face of ongoing challenges confronting Jews collectively and Israel as the reborn nation state of the Jewish People.

Israel faces a myriad of major problems.

Ever since its rebirth in 1948, the country has had to confront daily crises that would have overwhelmed most nations. It is therefore not surprising that today’s challenges are a repeat and rerun of past ones. Those who opposed the Jewish People’s restored sovereignty in their indigenous ancestral homeland in the 1920s and in 1947/48 are still working to undermine it.

The threat of a nuclear-enabled Iran remains a priority to deal with and confront.

The immediate return of each and every kidnapped hostage from the malign clutches of Hamas must be paramount. Making sure that Hamas and every other terror group is defanged is an ongoing objective.

The scandalous situation of Charedi exemptions from IDF and national service is a subject that hitherto was glossed over but has now become too toxic to ignore.

One needs to be mindful that there is a slow but increasingly noticeable trend of young Charedi men who are indeed participating one way or another in service to the country. They are volunteering as first responders with Magen David Adom, Hatzalah and Zaka, all vital and important parts of Israel’s emergency services. Charedi men are also members of the IDF Chevra Kadisha unit and increasingly visible in the special combat units established for them in the IDF.

Many of these young men face being ostracised by their peers, families and communities. Despite this disgraceful phenomenon, they remain determined to contribute to the safety and welfare of the country.

I mention these examples because they highlight the appalling and transparent inconsistency of the majority who shun national service. Even worse are the actions and rhetoric of the Charedi Rabbinic and political leaderships. Their frenetic refusal to encourage and facilitate a whole generation of young men to stand shoulder to shoulder with those defending the country is inexcusable and becoming increasingly untenable.

My first exposure to the disconnection between Charedi communities and the State occurred not long after we had made aliyah thirty-four years ago. Spending Shabbat with a national religious Zionist family who lived in an increasingly ultra-Orthodox Jerusalem suburb proved to be an enjoyable and educational experience. Our host attended a Charedi Synagogue one block from his apartment. He explained that it was more convenient than climbing steep steps to a local mainstream-affiliated one.

As New Zealand has never been home to Jews of Hassidic or non-Hassidic Charedim, I looked forward to this encounter. I was certainly the “odd Jew out” and the only one with a white kippah and not wearing a black suit. Nevertheless, everyone was friendly and the service familiar, albeit with different tunes. What struck me forcefully, however, was the omission of any prayer for the welfare of the country and for the safety of those defending it. When I queried my host about this, he confirmed that this was the norm in all Charedi Synagogues in Israel.

How, I mused, could these groups accept millions of shekels from the Government and at the same time spurn praying for the country’s safety? How on earth can they ignore the sacrifices being made by those defending the country against suicidal and jihadist terrorists dedicated to murdering Israelis?

At present, eighty thousand men between the ages of 18 and 24 are exempt from IDF duties because ostensibly they are studying full time in Yeshivot. The Coalition is trying to pass legislation that will enshrine this mass evasion in law and perpetuate a disgusting state of affairs. To make matters even worse is the fact that taxpayers are funding subsidies and grants to these supposed students and Yeshivot and schools. Not all alleged students attend studies full time, and those who don’t are still exempt from call-up.

The role of the Charedi political parties and their rabbinic patrons is a transparent disgrace. Seeking to justify this mass refusal to serve, they piously pontificate that these yeshiva students are, in fact, safeguarding and defending the country by studying our sacred texts. This claim is unsustainable. If it were true, then how do they explain that Yeshiva students and their rabbis were murdered alongside millions of Jews during the Shoah? Yeshiva rabbis and their students were likewise massacred indiscriminately by Arabs during the 1929 Hebron and Jerusalem pogroms.

Even more despicably, after several Charedi soldiers were killed in Gaza operations, they claimed that their deaths were a result of their abandoning Torah studies. This viscous vitriol is a sign of how disconnected they are becoming from mainstream society.

The only guarantee of preventing another such tragedy is for all Jews, every single able-bodied one, to be trained and prepared to physically defend their communities.

It is asserted that serving in the IDF will entice these young men from their insulated way of life and lead them morally astray. The IDF has established specialised units to address this issue. The frantic efforts to prevent young Charedi men from serving have more to do with maintaining control over them and ensuring that the flow of money continues uninterrupted.

Some have suggested that if a universal draft law is enforced, there could be an exodus of Charedi families from the country. Which countries would they go to where non-working men can still receive handouts from the Government? Is it back to the past with resurrected shtetls in Ukraine, Poland and Russia?

How much longer can a generation receive only a minimum education devoid of exposure to English, science, mathematics and history?

How long can a society be sustained that relies solely on donations and welfare payments?

Manpower shortages and a rapidly rising sense of outrage from the silent majority of Jewish Israelis are bringing this situation to the boil. Either the coalition surrenders to blatant blackmail, or it finally enacts equal service for all with financial penalties for those who have no valid excuse.

The next elections may very likely result in the Charedi parties being excluded from a governing coalition.

The time is long overdue for the Prime Minister to remind all concerned of the admonition of our greatest prophet and leader, Moshe (Moses).

Stressing a collective responsibility for all tribes in the face of danger, he stated: “shall your brethren go to war while you sit here?”

What was true then at the dawn of our claiming sovereignty is even truer today when our sovereignty is challenged and threatened.

Removing Yuli Edelstein this week, the Likud chairman of the Knesset committee considering universal service because he refuses to kowtow to Charedi threats, is the height of political cynicism. Replacing him with someone who is deemed more compliant is a transparent disgrace.

Failure to enact legislation that obligates all sectors of Israeli society to participate in the collective defence of the nation will be the straw that finally breaks the proverbial camel’s back.

If this scandalous situation is not rectified, the electoral fallout that follows is bound to be swift and unmistakable.

SHOCKING: Vueling Airlines Kicks 50 Jewish Children Off Plane for Singing Hebrew Songs, Arrests Female Camp Leader

A disturbing incident unfolded in Spain this week, as Vueling Airlines forcibly removed a group of 50 French Jewish children, ages 10 to 15, from a flight while violently arresting their 21-year-old chaperone, the director of the Kinneret summer camp.

The children, who were en route back to France from a camp program, were left stranded in Valencia after Vueling staff allegedly made antisemitic remarks and ordered them off the aircraft simply for singing Hebrew songs. One crew member reportedly declared that “Israel is a terrorist state” before forcing the group off the plane.

Witnesses say the children were frightened and confused as the airline escalated the situation. The most shocking moment came when the group’s chaperone was reportedly beaten and forcibly detained by Spanish authorities, allegedly at the request of airline staff. Her only apparent “offense” was calmly advocating for the children in her care.

The group remains in Valencia, awaiting arrangements to return home to France.

This incident comes amid a wave of rising antisemitism across Europe, fueled by Hamas propaganda and echoed by platforms like Al Jazeera, Haaretz, and others. As anti-Jewish rhetoric is normalized, real-world abuse has intensified—and this case stands out as one of the most egregious yet.

As of now, Vueling Airlines, a subsidiary of IAG (International Airlines Group), has not issued a public statement.

Jewish organizations in France and Spain are calling for an immediate investigation and accountability for what they describe as blatant antisemitic discrimination and the abuse of minors.

This is a developing story.