Jews often do not know that they can fight back.
Laws on the books in the US, UK and Canada provide a way to fight back
In April 2024, massive demonstrations were organized against Israel on campuses throughout the West.
Laws on the books in the US, UK and Canada provide a way to fight back
As the US and other countries pressure Israel to increase food aid to Gaza, Israeli officials familiar with the situation say Gaza has been overwhelmed by food aid. Israeli officials harshly criticize American representatives, led by Ambassador David Satterfield, accusing them of echoing the lie about “starvation in Gaza.”
Israel Hayom has learned that every evening at 8 p.m., a quadrilateral forum takes place with representatives from Israel, the US, the UN, and Egypt, where a daily report on the humanitarian situation in Gaza is provided.
On Israel’s behalf, representatives from the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) participate. The Americans are represented by the Special Envoy for Middle East Humanitarian Issues David Satterfield. Together, they count how many trucks were inspected and entered the Strip, how many unloaded their contents inside, and how many did not, as well as the extent of hunger in Gaza.
1.
Last Friday. The #GazaFamine
Video taken from the south part oh the strip. pic.twitter.com/D1hjPhWAmC— Ariel Kahana אריאל כהנא (@arik3000) April 17, 2024
“There is no food shortage in Gaza, and there never was,” says an Israeli official familiar with the details. “The stores are full, the markets are bursting with goods, fruits, vegetables, shawarma, pitas – there is everything. Do you know why they no longer loot convoys? Because there is no shortage. The quantities entering are not normal.”
Recently, COGAT Commander Maj. Gen. Ghassan Alian issued an unusual statement saying: “Israel does not constitute a bottleneck when it comes to providing humanitarian aid. The UN needs to do the job it is charged with and do it properly.” These comments are just the tip of the iceberg of what officials dealing with aid think behind closed doors.
“There is no need to open a passage in northern Gaza, no need to open the port of Ashdod, and also no need for an air corridor in Gaza – because there is no lack of food. The air corridor is a crazy operation, the airdrops are unnecessary – they are expensive and the quantities are small, but they photograph well. The UN cannot distribute what enters, so why would more be needed?” an Israeli official familiar with the data said.
Despite this data, last week Satterfield told the American Jewish Committee (AJC) that “there is an immediate risk of starvation, for most if not all 2.2 million people in Gaza.” This, despite the fact that in the three previous days, around 300 trucks entered the Strip per day.
In Israel, they believe that the way senior administration officials express themselves echoes the false claims of Hamas supporters in the US as if genocide is taking place in Gaza. “The rhetoric of Satterfield and others is shocking,” says an official in the field of public diplomacy. “The only explanation for the disparity between what they know and what they say must be political. They say what will be pleasant for voters to hear. Incidentally, you can see that the policy in practice does not change.”
Our annual Seder commemoration of the Exodus from Egypt has concluded for another year.
This time, however, our collective gatherings were tinged with anxiety and apprehension over the still unresolved fate of our kidnapped hostages held by the terror groups in Gaza.
At the same time, many families had loved ones missing as they were on active duty in the south and north of the country, making sure that for one night at least, the nation of Israel could peacefully observe the Seder.
We, like most other families, kept a place setting with an empty chair at the table to symbolize the hostages. It reminded us of the time not that long ago when we did the same as a message to the Soviet Union to let its imprisoned Jews go. That thankfully succeeded as the evil regime collapsed and its enslaved Jews made an exodus to freedom.
Incredibly, but unsurprisingly, many remained. This replicated those Hebrews who preferred to remain in Egypt rather than taking the opportunity to escape from a society which had no long term future for Jewish existence. The millions of dollars which are being poured into sustaining Jewish life may, in the short term, ensure some sort of continuity. However, given the inherent corruption and inbuilt animosity to Jews, their future security is highly doubtful.
The same can be said for those Jews still remaining in the Ukraine where sooner rather than later they will be held as scapegoats for everything that will go wrong. Like Joseph in Egypt there will arise another generation who knew not Zelensky and then the same old story will repeat itself. It is not as though Ukraine has had an exactly clean record as far as Jew hate is concerned.
South African Jews who still cling to their illusory fortified mansions in Johannesburg, one of the crime capitals of the world, are another group rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Like those of our ancestors in the trek to the Promised Land they seem to believe that the illusory lifestyle in a failing country is preferable to any initial hardships in a more welcoming environment.
Europe’s Jews are doomed as Islamic jihadist violence and intolerance takes over. This continent was never in the long run a tolerant and sustainable place for Jews and in the not too distant future it will be yet another graveyard for not only Jews but also Christians and anyone who stands for religious freedom and tolerance.
Malmo in Sweden is a perfect example of what Scandinavian and Dutch Jews can expect to experience if they stay.
London’s Jews are already experiencing a foretaste of what will inevitably follow. The prospect of more Galloway and Corbyn supporters attaining positions of political ascendancy should be ringing loud warning bells. Once again, far too many are living in denial and maintaining a pretence that “it can’t happen again here.”
Even the “lucky country” of Australia is not immune to all these malevolent manifestations and given the disparity in growth rates between the Jewish and Islamic communities the electoral prospects do not look too promising.
At the moment the most glaring example of what the future holds is being played out in the United States.
This is where on Seder night one of the most shameful examples of communal disconnection occurred.
Misnamed “Jewish Voices for Peace” and other such self-loathing individuals advertised an “anti Zionist Passover Seder.” It was billed as an opportunity to “focus on Palestinian liberation.”
Yes, you read correctly.
While the rest of the Jewish world focused on the core reason for Passover which is the liberation of the Hebrews from Egyptian bondage and their subsequent journey to Eretz Israel these disconnected Jews of today preferred to rewrite history. The Hebrews of Egypt were slaves to an oppressive regime. The fake Palestinians of today are slaves to an oppressive ideology which also seeks to deny the Jewish People any future in the Land which was promised to them and their future generations. When our ancestors faced military attempts to thwart achieving sovereignty in their historic homeland they fought back. The anti-Zionists of today would rather we surrendered to terror and meekly hand over the country. Their belief that those seeking our demise would be so grateful for this gesture that any remaining Jews would be allowed to live in tolerant tranquility is hallucinatory. The end result of their disconnected obsessions would inevitably be the abandonment of any sort of Jewish rights and rewarding latter day Islamic occupiers.
Where were these “voices for peace” when the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan banned Israelis and Jews from praying at the Kotel, the Cave of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs in Hebron and Rachel’s Tomb? Why was there nary a peep from these morally bankrupt groups when Arab terrorists murdered Israelis and Jews prior to 1967 before even one “settlement” was ever established? Why are they marching arm in arm with mobs shouting for the elimination of Jews?
The spectacle of individuals who only belatedly use some sort of tenuous Jewish connection to validate their loathing of the Jewish People’s return to Zion is of course fuel for the media. Nothing makes for better ratings than a group of disaffected individuals cloaking themselves in some sort of disconnect from the mainstream. Throw in some third-generation descendant of a Holocaust survivor, and you have a perfect weapon with which to bludgeon all supporters of Israel.
The agenda of these people is so warped that they would prefer to emasculate a religious observance in order to prove their anti-Zionist credentials.
The objective of the Exodus was the journey via Mount Sinai to a particular land. At Sinai we received our constitution and a set of laws which turned tribes into a nation. No doubt, if the followers of Neturei Karta and the secular self-haters had been alive, then they would have objected to this “Zionist” agenda.
The so called “wicked child” in the Haggadah recitation is according to the explanation of some commentators a Jewish person who deliberately severs his or her identification with the community. Those who are engaged in smearing Israel are a perfect example of this. We have been “plagued” with these types of individuals all through our long history.
As we celebrate Pesach in our sovereign Jewish State those of us who have made aliyah from the furthest parts of the globe can reflect on the historical significances which enabled us to reach this day.
For those living in the Diaspora where Jewish life is becoming untenable it is time to rethink and plan for a better Jewish future.
Moses and Joshua knew that establishing and securing Jewish sovereignty would be a long and, at times, a bitter battle.
Nothing has changed over the millennia.
That is why we must annually renew the pledge to strengthen our country and to ensure that never again will we be powerless and at the mercy of others.
Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), Chair of the House Global Human Rights and International Organizations Subcommittee, called the recently released report on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) “an absolute whitewash aimed at covering up the antisemitism, violence and hate that has poisoned the agency for decades.”
Smith, the author of legislation to ban US funding for UNRWA, said “the grotesque flaws in the report further underscore how UNRWA apologists have operated with impunity over the years trying to deceive and vindicate the actions of this appalling agency. No one should be fooled.”
Officially called the report of the Independent Review Group, the document is widely referred to as the Colonna report after its chief author.
“From the very beginning, the Colonna report never aimed to be anything but a total whitewash,” Smith continued. “Senior officials connected to the report repeatedly stated that their goal was to ‘reassure donors’ and ‘provide the donors with further cover.’”
“It’s no coincidence that the staff that conducted the review—from its leadership on down—was comprised entirely of individuals and organizations with long histories of dismissing concerns over UNRWA’s infiltration by Hamas and its blatant promotion and complicity in murderous antisemitism,” said Smith. “Naturally, they produced a ‘report’ that ignores grave abuses and proposes cosmetic reforms.”
“UNRWA remains an unreformable, terror-complicit agency that teaches Palestinian children to hate Jews and glorifies suicidal martyrdom and the evisceration of Israel as a state,” Smith said. “It is a child soldier factory—and no bogus report can change that fact.”
“It’s long past time for the US and the rest of the world to move beyond this Hamas-ridden UN agency and find an alternative that does not promote, espouse, or affiliate with entities or individuals that advance violence, terrorism and antisemitism,” said Smith.
Smith, who has chaired three congressional hearings over the past ten months on UNRWA’s unbridled antisemitism, is the author of the Stop Support for UNRWA Act (HR 7122)—which would permanently prohibit US contributions to UNRWA. Elements of Smith’s legislation were incorporated into appropriations legislation and signed into law in March to prohibit US funding for UNRWA for one year.
The professor stood at the entrance to the university campus rattled by antisemitic protests. His employee entry pass, didn’t work. He was shocked. He knew the university was hostile toward him. He knew the atmosphere was charged. He knew Jewish students were afraid. He heard the antisemitic chants, “Jews, go back to Poland.” He heard calls for more and more acts of slaughter. And he was convinced that the university officials would deal with the hooligans and racists, not with those who were fighting against them. But he was wrong.
This didn’t happen in Munich in the 1930s, nor in Berlin. It happened at New York’s Columbia University last weekend. The professor is Shai Davidai, an Israeli-American, a lecturer at the prestigious university’s business school affiliated with the Ivy League.
A few weeks ago, we sat in Manhattan after a lecture I myself delivered at the same university. The small protest that awaited me, with security standing at the entrance to the building and the lecture hall, turned into a massive demonstration last week. Students set up tents in the heart of the campus.
Combating the anti-Semitism radiating from U.S. college campuses will require work on many fronts. Some of the drivers could take enormous effort to uproot—for example, the DEI culture that has reshaped K–12 and postsecondary institutions. A less frequently discussed factor is easier to address: U.S. universities should stop letting foreign entities shape campus intellectual life.
Centers dedicated to the study of the Middle East, many receiving lavish foreign financial support, do more to promote anti-Zionist and pro-Hamas narratives than virtually any other force on campus. Even a small number of biased faculty can have an outsize influence because the dominant intersectional ideologies leave students primed to embrace anti-Semitic attitudes.
In effect, U.S. campuses have been importing anti-Semitic propaganda for almost 50 years. As the New York Times reported in 1978, “Oil wealth from the Middle East is starting to flow onto college and university campuses throughout the country, bringing a bonanza of endowed chairs and new programs.” That initial flood of money—and specific concerns about gifts to Georgetown University’s Center for Contemporary Arab Studies—led to the establishment of foreign gift-reporting requirements in 1986. To this day, Section 117 of the Higher Education Act requires universities to report foreign gifts above $250,000.
Unfortunately, weak enforcement by the Department of Education allowed many universities to ignore the requirement. That changed in 2019, when Secretary Betsy DeVos initiated noncompliance investigations at several top schools. In 2023 congressional testimony, Paul Moore, chief investigative council at the Department of Education during the Trump administration, described the sea change that followed: “enhanced enforcement . . . produced dramatic results,” including the “disclosure of more than $6.5 billion in previously undisclosed foreign gifts and contributions.” The Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI), which analyzed the updated disclosures for 2014–19, found that over $2.7 billion in gifts came from Qatari sources, $1.2 billion from Chinese entities, and over $1 billion originated in Saudi Arabia.
The Biden administration, pressured by the higher-education lobby, closed outstanding Section 117 investigations in August 2022. Later the same year, the Department of Education moved enforcement from the Office of the General Council to the Office of Federal Student Aid. Disclosures have dwindled since.
Foreign entities invest in U.S. universities for many reasons, including to gain access to sensitive technology and to exert influence over cutting-edge researchers. When it comes to shaping the campus marketplace of ideas, gifts to Middle East studies centers have paid off. A 2022 report by the National Association of Scholars, Hijacked, looked at more than 50 such centers and concluded that they produce “biased material that promotes the political interests of the donors.” A 2020 Education Department study noted that Saudi Arabia has advanced “Islamic ideology . . . through multimillion-dollar donations to elite Western institutions” since 9/11.
These centers are ground zero for Jew-hatred in the academy today. An AMCHA Initiative study of anti-Zionist and BDS-supporting faculty found that 70 percent are associated with ethnic, gender, or Middle East studies departments. (These departments sponsor almost 90 percent of events containing anti-Zionist or pro-BDS rhetoric.) Through their research, teaching, and the speakers they host, the centers demonize Israel and make anti-Semitic attitudes seem permissible, even respectable, to impressionable students.
The presence of anti-Zionist faculty, in turn, is associated with significantly higher levels of student-on-student harassment involving Jews, including “incidents that target Jewish students for harm.” The NCRI study reached the same conclusion, finding “a correlation between the existence of undocumented funding and incidents of targeted anti-Semitism.”
What can be done? The recent success in closing Confucius Institutes—funded by the Chinese government to spread propaganda on American campuses—proves that public and political pressure can force colleges to reject foreign money. Universities should refuse all gifts from entities with interests antithetical to this country’s, especially gifts related to academic programs. Programs built on foreign donations should be dismantled unless they are obviously worth supporting from the general fund. State lawmakers can pass legislation to forbid, or at least carefully scrutinize, partnerships and contracts at public institutions with countries of concern.
Federal policymakers can also act. The next administration should aggressively enforce foreign gift-reporting requirements. And Congress should consider new legislation that would lower the reporting threshold for foreign gifts and prohibit certain partnerships with entities of concern.
When Israel’s ambassador was denied a meeting with the Biden administration in May 2021, he was looking to raise concerns about American funding to the United Nations’ Palestinian aid agency, whose employees went on to participate in Hamas’s Oct. 7 terror strike last year, internal government emails show.
Samantha Power, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), declined to take a meeting with Gilad Erdan, then the Israeli ambassador to the United States, when the Jewish state was locked in its 2021 conflict with Hamas, the Washington Free Beacon reported in February, citing internal USAID emails.
A new tranche of scheduling memos from that time shows that Power personally declined to meet with Erdan until the war with Hamas was over. The memos also show Power’s staff warned her that the Israeli ambassador would likely raise concerns about the Biden administration’s decision to restart funding to the U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). The agency has been engulfed in controversy since reports showed that several of its employees helped Hamas kill more than 1,200 Jews.
The memos indicate that Israel was attempting to warn the Biden administration about UNRWA’s links to Hamas and signal concern with the aid group’s employment of individuals affiliated with the terror group. The United States restarted millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for UNRWA just weeks before Erdan requested the meeting with Power and the 2021 conflict with Hamas broke out.
In the previously unreported scheduling memo, Power says she wants to defer the meeting until Israel inks a ceasefire with Hamas, a move that increased pressure on the Jewish state to scale back its military operations in the Gaza Strip. The Biden administration has employed similar tactics in recent months as it again attempts to pressure Israel into ending its war on Hamas and begin pumping millions of aid dollars into the war torn Gaza Strip.
“Let’s revert after Gaza war (not before),” Power wrote in the margins of the memo prepared by her staff, who had recommended she take the meeting.
The memo informed Power that the Israeli ambassador may “voice concerns about [U.S. government] support for UNRWA,” which could have contributed to the USAID leader’s hesitance to discuss the issue.
Power’s staffers eventually informed their colleagues in the region that the meeting would not take place.
“The Administrator [Power] would like to take the meeting with the Ambassador but wants to hold until there is a ceasefire or resolution to the currently [sic] escalation of the conflict,” a scheduler in Power’s office wrote in a May 18 email.
That note, as well as the scheduling memo, was produced through a Freedom and Information Act request and provided to the Free Beacon by the Center to Advance Security in America (CASA), a government watchdog group.
CASA director James Fitzpatrick said the memo indicates the Biden administration did not want to address Israel’s concerns about UNRWA at a time when it was just starting to pour millions into the aid group’s coffers.
“Given that it has since been uncovered that UNWRA employees were involved in the Hamas attack on innocent Israeli citizens, it is extremely disturbing that Ambassador Erdan’s concerns were not addressed in a timely manner by USAID and Power,” Fitzpatrick told the Free Beacon. “The administration’s priority should be meeting and conferring with our allies about their concerns, whenever possible, not putting conditions on meetings when they are responding to terrorist attacks.”
Power played a central role in restarting American funding to UNRWA, which was frozen under the Trump administration because of the aid group’s anti-Israel bias and suspected links to Hamas.
Israel has been a vocal opponent of this funding, publicly and privately pushing the Biden administration to reconsider its financial support for UNRWA, which has totaled millions in recent years.
The United States froze UNRWA funding earlier this year, after it became clear that around a dozen of the aid group’s employees participated in the Oct. 7 attacks. Israel estimates that around 10 percent of UNRWA’s workforce is affiliated with Hamas.
Amid the funding freeze, the State Department has continued to work with UNRWA, saying the U.N. agency serves a “critical role” delivering aid in the Gaza Strip. Power said in February that the Biden administration “will not be abandoning UNRWA.”
USAID’s global funding initiatives have also been plagued by poor oversight.
The agency funneled nearly $1 million “to a terror charity in Gaza involved with the son of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh,” a watchdog group reported earlier this month.
USAID has faced Republican pressure in Congress for awarding taxpayer funds to groups with alleged ties to terrorism. The agency’s inspector general is reportedly investigating claims that at least $110,000 in funds were sent to a charity tied to Pakistani militant groups.
Why was this night different from all other nights?
Instead of a restful and peaceful night’s sleep, we were roused from our slumber at approximately 1.30am by a series of loud explosions. Looking out from our bedroom window, we beheld an eerie sight reminiscent of a Star Wars movie. Streaking across the night sky were innumerable illuminated orange objects which all seemed to disintegrate and explode. I guessed that they were the Iranian drones which had been launched from Iran. There had been reports earlier in the evening of a possible drone strike.
Within a few minutes, the air raid sirens wailed, and unaware whether missiles were heading in our direction, it was a mad dash for our local communal air raid shelter only about 30 seconds from our home. The sirens ceased almost immediately which indicated that nothing was heading our way. Drones were still flying but obviously posed no lethal threat.
By this time, everyone in the country was up and monitoring the news, and needless to say, mobile phones were being used to check up on family and friends. Getting back to sleep proved to be a difficult exercise especially for those glued to the breaking news developments.
It was only the next day that one had time to think about the unfolding events and draw some conclusions.
I predicted that it would take no more than a couple of hours for all the usual crowd to warn Israel not to retaliate, to show restraint and allow “diplomacy” to deal with the terrorist regime in Iran.
Pesach (Passover) is, therefore, an ideal time to remember how our ancestors dealt with past tyrants whose agenda included ethnic cleansing, murder, enslavement, kidnapping and murder. The exodus from Egyptian bondage only occurred after an escalating series of plagues and diplomatic negotiations with Pharaoh. His attempt to kill all Hebrew male babies at birth failed thanks to the heroic efforts of the midwives who thwarted this pogrom. Moses and Aaron did try to negotiate an exit strategy but this failed in the face of a stubborn refusal to agree on the part of the Egyptian leader.
A series of afflictions still made no impression and it was therefore only after the final plague that the Hebrews were allowed to depart. They had hardly left when Pharaoh regretted his decision and pursued them with his entire army determined to finally wipe them all out. This of course ended in spectacular failure at the sea of reeds.
The lessons we should be able to draw are that negotiating with and appeasing dictators, tyrants and Jew haters is a lost cause and only results in worse disasters. So, it has been proven throughout Jewish history and is especially relevant in our time. Unfortunately, the rest of the world refuses to learn and still stubbornly clings to the illusion that kowtowing to thugs and bullies will buy peace.
The one plague that has survived millennia of mutations is hate for the Jewish People and its promised homeland. The Babylonians and the Romans did their level best to not only destroy Judea and Israel and exile its Jewish inhabitants but also to ensure that the very idea of Jewish sovereignty should be eradicated. Today’s anti-Israel/Zionist haters have the same agenda as recent events and realities have so dramatically demonstrated.
This brings us back to current developments and their potential outcomes.
Without a shadow of a doubt, Iran has been emboldened by the reluctance and refusal of the democracies to make it accountable and pay a heavy price for its headlong rush towards nuclear weapons. Despite a clear and unambiguous message of its intentions to destroy Israel, the international community led by the Biden Administration has engaged in appeasement mode policies.
Much is being made of the fact that the USA and UK joined Israel in helping to repel the drone and missile barrages. However, overlooked is the fact that this apparent act of solidarity carried with it a subsequent caveat. Listening to the frantic chorus of admonitions issuing forth from Western capitals, the unmistakable conclusion is one of terrified appeasers frenetically trying to distance themselves from any remote involvement in taking firm action to punish Iran.
What other conclusion can one reach when almost every leader of the democratic world warns Israel in the sternest language not to retaliate because by doing so world peace will be in peril? The delusion that so-called diplomacy will deter Iran from further terror attacks and halt its stampede to nuclear capabilities is so firmly embedded in foreign policy appeasers’ minds that no amount of proof to the contrary will alter their hallucinations.
Biden insists that the US does not want conflict with Iran and to prove this he showers the mullahs with billions of unfrozen funds. In case Tehran still does not get the message his Government makes it clear that Washington will not back any Israeli response. The Lord Cameron wags his fingers and warns Israel not to respond as do the French and others. For good measure, the UN Secretary General declaimed that “acts of reprisal involving force are barred under international law.” Not to be left out of the international chorus of the Munich appeasers’ chorus is the NZ Foreign Minister who piously declared that he expected both sides to now refrain from fuelling tensions.
The reaction to the Iranian attack by China and Russia is predictable especially as they are long time supporters of the Iranian Mullah regime and its evil intentions. It is nothing short of an amazing and delusionary act of craven moral cowardice that those who should be thwarting Iranian genocidal ambitions are instead running to the UN. This corrupted body has neither the will nor the ability to sanction Iran. Proof of this is the fact that Iran is currently chair of the UN Conference on Disarmament. What more glaring farce can one encounter?
Israel needs to ask Cameron if he would have demanded from Churchill that the UK not retaliate for the German blitz on the UK. When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour would those who today demand Israel not retaliate have told Roosevelt the same? When Margaret Thatcher retaliated against the Argentinean invasion of the Falkland Islands did the UN convulse and was the UK dragged in front of the ICJ at The Hague?
In the face of a demand that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps be banned the UK Prime Minister reportedly has dismissed this because “it would sever diplomatic ties with Tehran.” Will Australia use this same specious and cowardly excuse instead of actually having a moral backbone?
If all this sounds eerily reminiscent of the years leading up to the Shoah you would be right. Add in the convulsive tsunami of Jew/Israel hate now enveloping all parts of the world and you have a perfect brew for what lies ahead thanks to the craven cowardice of the morally bankrupt.
Every year there is a ceremony in Germany to commemorate the liberation of the Bergen Belsen concentration camp. This year it has been delayed until a later date and Israeli representatives have been uninvited to speak. It is the height of irony but indicative of the way things are headed that Germany, of all countries, should surrender in the face of Nazi-type mobs.
This brings us back to the topic of plagues.
It was only after a series of escalating disasters that our ancestors were let go. The final humiliation for the Egyptians followed at the Reed Sea.
Every Seder, we remember how, in every generation, there are those who rise up to destroy us.
This Pesach, therefore, as our hostages remain captive and we face threats to our very right to live, we need to resolve to do what needs to be done in order to thwart and defeat the nefarious designs of our enemies.
May this year’s celebrations herald the beginning of our redemption and the fulfilment for more Jews of the pledge to be next year in a fully restored and united Jerusalem, our eternal Capital.
Michael Kuttner is a Jewish New Zealander who for many years was actively involved with various communal organisations connected to Judaism and Israel. He now lives in Israel and is J-Wire’s correspondent in the region.