What is Happening on the Temple Mount – Tisha B’av 5761?

Members of the “Committee to Prevent Archaeological Destruction on the Temple Mount” include A. B. Yehoshua, Amos Oz and S. Yizhar, former justices Meir Shamgar and Miriam Ben-Porat, as well as many archaeologists.

The committee constantly passes on reports about a continuing destruction of antiquities on the mount. Some of the reports have been confirmed, police have denied others, and some that police denied in the past have been proved true subsequently.

The politicians – neither in the days of the Barak administration nor in the current one, have taken no steps to halt waqf construction activity. Most of this is done without permission and all of it without archaeological supervision.

Antiquities Authority archaeologists were first kept away from the Temple Mount in September 1996 after the opening of the northern entrance to the Hasmonean Tunnel by the Netanyahu government. For a few months in 1999,the Barak government managed to get some supervision by the Antiquities Authority back onto the mount, but that was halted in October 2000 when the Intifada broke out.

Since last Rosh Hashana, the Temple Mount has been closed to both Antiquities Authority people and indeed to anyone who is not Muslim, except for the Israeli police, which continue to patrol the area at various levels of intensity. It is not clear if the police are conducting ongoing systematic surveillance of the underground construction work by the waqf and the Israeli Islamic Movement. The only significant difference that came following the election of the Sharon government is that the decision to prevent Muslims from bringing additional construction material onto the mount is generally being enforced.

The opposition to Israel’s policy of ignoring what is happening on the mount with regard to the destruction of antiquities comes from both within the establishment and from outside it. Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein, who in the past called the activity on the mount “a kick at the history of the Jewish people,” sent some vociferous letters to former prime minister Ehud Barak and has made his views known to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

The Antiquities Authority occasionally protests about the construction work. The former director general of the authority, Amir Drori, called the work in the Solomon’s Stables area “an archaeological crime.” But the positions taken by both Rubinstein and Drori have been rejected time and again.

The main worry at the political level is of a confrontation between the security forces and thousands of Muslims, which would spread to far beyond the Temple Mount – to Jerusalem, the territories and possibly to other Arab states. But there are those in both the police and Shin Bet who are skeptical of those concerns.

Various petitions to the High Court, both by the public committee and the various veteran Temple Mount organizations, have been rejected. The court has made clear that the issue is the responsibility of the politicians and it has no intention of intervening. The court usually refrains from getting into the details of the controversy between the police and the Temple Mount organizations.

For the past two years no journalists have been allowed on the mount except for those whom the waqf approves as sympathetic to the waqf’s cause. Visits to the mount are nearly impossible and photography is strictly forbidden.

This article ran in HaAretz on July 29, 2001

Will US Military Observers Return in Body Bags?

During US Secretary of State Colin Powell’s June 28th visit to Israel, Powell announced that the US would dispatch military “observers” to oversee implementation of US-brokered accords between Israel and the PLO. On July 27th, two days before the Tisha B’Av fast that marks the conquest and destruction of Jerusalem, the new US ambassador, a Jewish American,. Daniel Kurtzer, was reported to be in the final stages of preparing the final draft for the deployment of US troops in Israel.

These US troops would patrol Jerusalem and Judea, also known as the west bank, all defined by the US as “occupied” by Israel.

Since US state department policy makers have determined that Jews have no sovereignty in Jerusalem or the west bank, US observers would be expected to show little respect for the concerns of Jews who live in these areas.

All this follows confirmed reports that the US has been training the security forces of the PLO, even at a time when the PLO has declared war on the state and people of Israel, soldiers and civilians alike, especially in Jerusalem and Judea.

US troops, even in the form of “observers”, would be an invading army, following in the footsteps of the British, who were awarded a mandate over Palestine by the League of Nations in the 1920’s and expelled by the new Jewish state during its War of Independence. 1945-1948

To the surprise of many, the US does recognize any part of Jerusalem as part of Israel, west or east. Any birth certificate, passport or legal document issued by the US Consul in Jerusalem reads “Jerusalem”, with no designated nation state mentioned.

The US state department maintains the policy that it adopted in 1948, which is that the Jerusalem -Bethlehem region must become an international city, when it was slated to be administered by the US under a UN trusteeship

Indeed, UN negotiator Count Folk Bernadotte was shot to death by Israeli Jews in September, 1948 in Jerusalem, he was in the final stages of negotiating that American plan to transfer ‘”greater Jerusalem” to a US trusteeship. The US had already selected a Mayor for Jerusalem, a Quaker prelate from Philadelphia.

The Swedes have never forgiven Israelis for killing Bernadotte.

Luck would have it that Bernadotte was not a US diplomat.

The US never abandoned the plan that Bernadotte was negotiating for Jerusalem when he was killed.

While Jewish religious law forbids Jews to raise a hand against an Israeli soldier, Jewish religious law would not forbid a Jew from resisting a soldier from a foreign army in Jerusalem or Judea.

Jewish Americans, amongst others, would be in for quite a shock if US troops fall at the hands of Israeli resistance fighters.

It is not too late for US public opinion to reconsider the idea of dispatching US military “observers” to Israel.

40 Palestinian Authority Organizations Attack Bi’tselem

40 Palestinian Authority Organizations condemn “B’Tselem biased position towards Settlements & Settlers in the Occupied Territories”: July 3rd, 2001

On 21.6.01 B’Tselem issued a press release entitled ‘B’Tselem condemns Palestinian statements supporting attacks against settlers’. As Palestinian organizations, we believe that the timing of this release, which coincides with an intense and misleading media campaign in support of illegal settlement by the Israeli Occupation Authorities, is inopportune and only serves to give the impression that settlers are “civilians” on par with the indigenous Palestinian population. Moreover, the release came as a response to the settlers’ appeals for Israeli human rights organizations to take a position against the killing of “innocent” and “civilian” settlers, and to issue a statement condemning the positions and statements of the PNA officials regarding attacks on settlers.

Instead of rushing behind the security establishment and responding to the settlers’ pressure, we believe that B’Tselem should focus its attention on the ongoing gross human rights violations that are occurring in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and should remain independent by maintaining an honest and unbiased position based on international humanitarian law and human rights principles.

A clear major problem with this release is the way in which it divides the issues of the illegality of settlements, settler violence, and settlers illegal status from the issue of violence against settlers, and how its wording plays with the legal provisions of international law. The press release effectively places the blame for current violence on Palestinians who are the victims of the settlements and settlers’ acts. The release does say that settlements are illegal, but qualifies this by stating that, “the settlers have no right to settle there permanently”. This in effect legitimized the settlers “temporary” presence in the Occupied Territories and does not pay attention to the relevant legal provisions. B’Tselem should explicitly declare that international law bans the occupied country from transferring its citizens to the occupied territory, and must state that the presence of settlers in the occupied territories is illegal, even for an interim period. Consequently, B’Tselem should take responsibility towards Israeli society by addressing it in brave and clear language that reveals the illegality of settlements and the agony they cause to the Palestinian people. Contrary to all legal conventions the press release also says that, “the demand to evacuate the settlements in the context of an Israeli-Palestinian agreement is legitimate.” No qualifications should be placed upon the right to demand the removal of settlements. They are blatantly illegal under international law and B’Tselem should demand that the Israeli Occupation Authorities dismantle the settlements and return the settlers to Israel even without an agreement. Until this is done, all settlers should be held liable for their crimes, which include the act of settlement, committed in the occupied territories, and must bear the consequences of their actions, which include Palestinian acts taken in self defense against their illegal aggression.

If B’Tselem had lain down the various “legal” and “human rights” it would be clear that the relationship between the law and its provisions and the issue of settlers and settlements can not be divided. By leave all legal provisions out of the content its release and dividing the illegality of settlers’ actions from the consequences of these actions, B’Tselem indicates two things. First, they indicate either a failure to understand or a disregard for the legal provisions that relate to settlement, and second, they seem to be attempting to turn around the relevant provisions by stripping them of their content disregarding their objectives. In this case, B’Tselem’s release in effect, “legalizes” the “illegal” settlements, and justifies the Interim presence of settlers in the Occupied Territories, in effect giving settlers an open door to continue to commit crimes and undertake illegal acts against Palestinians.

In our attempt to further explain our dismay over this release, and the political implications of the language used in the release, we will primarily depend on humanitarian law and international human rights standards to indicate the potential risks that are inherent in the B’Tselem release. The rules and the provisions of humanitarian international law are set forth through the following legal standards:

First Article 49 (6) of the 4th Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in time of War states that “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies”. Under this explicitly clear provision all steps that have been taken by the Israeli Occupation Authorities in relation to the transfer and settlement of its citizens to the Palestinian Occupied Territories are illegal. Actions taken in contravention of this Article have resulted in severe violations of the rights of the Palestinian residents of the Occupied Territories. These violations include, but are not limited to the confiscation of Palestinian natural resources, including land and water, for use by settlers. These actions are also in violation of International Law and the provisions of international humanitarian law, which prohibit the confiscation of property and resources for reasons other than security. Consequently, the presence of settlers in the occupied territories, and all forms of settlement are illegal.

Second: The Israeli Occupation Authorities have used all means within their power to illegally take possession of Palestinian owned lands, to build settlements, and to transfer settlers to these locations. The land acquired by Israel for the building of settlements was often confiscated after being declared “government property”, “absentee property”, or after being sealed for use as closed military zones. In most cases the Israeli government then built military posts on these lands, as with the so called “MAHAZ”, “MAHOLA B” and “Warrior Youth Pioneer”. These posts often later evolved into settlements. An example of this is the expropriation of the lands surrounding “Beit El” military post, following the Supreme Court decision in case No. 606/78. These lands were later turned into a large civil settlement, which swallowed much of the surrounding Palestinian territory. Additionally, settlements are considered an integral part of the “territorial defense” system, the Hagana Merhavat, in Hebrew, and often serve both military and civilian functions. Settlements, and therefore settlers cannot be viewed as truly “civilian”.

In view of the above, we the undersigned Palestinian organizations, condemn B’Tselem’s position that ignores the fact that all forms of settlement are illegal and qualify as war crimes. We also reiterate the Palestinians People’s right to resist the occupation and its consequences by all available legal means guaranteed by international customs and conventions.

Statement signed by:

  1. The Palestinian Hydrology Group
  2. The Union of Agricultural Work Committees
  3. The Loving Care Patient Society
  4. Rawat Al Zuhur Society
  5. Center for Citizen’s Rights
  6. Defence for Children International “DCI”/Palestine
  7. First Ramallah Group
  8. Popular Art Center
  9. Science and Cultural Center
  10. Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA)
  11. The Educational Network
  12. Teacher Creativity Center (TCC)
  13. Tamar Institute for Community Education
  14. Dur Al-Salam Hospital
  15. Union Of Health Work Committee
  16. Ad Dammar Association for Human Rights
  17. The Palestinian Center for Peace and Democracy
  18. Al-Manhal Cultural Center
  19. Arab Thought Forum
  20. The Citizens Rights Center
  21. Besan Center for Research and Development
  22. The Development Center: “Ma’an”
  23. Muwaita: The Palestinian Institute for the Study of Democracy
  24. The General Committee for the Defence of the Land
  25. The Palestinian Counseling Center
  26. Democracy and Worker’s Rights Center
  27. The Palestinian Society for the Study of International Affairs
  28. The Palestinian Society for Consumer Protection
  29. The Palestinian Women’s Society for Development
  30. Women’s Affairs Center
  31. Al Huda Women’s Association
  32. Almajd Women’s Assn.
  33. Al Magazzi Cultural Center
  34. Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center
  35. Women’s Studie Centre
  36. Al-Hannan Association for Mother and Child
  37. The Arab Center for Agricultural Development
  38. The National Society for Rehabilitation
  39. The Union of Palestinian Medical Relief Committees
  40. The Palestinian Center for Microsprojects Development.

Text of Knesset Members Letter to EU Complaining of Interference With Israeli Internal Affairs

The Knesset
Jerusalem, 6 Tamuz, 5761
27 June, 2001

To: PM Guy Verhofstadt
President of the European Union

It has been made public in Israel that the European Union has been providing financial support to Israeli groups/institutions/organizations that are all partisan and political in nature. This is a blatant attempt at interfering in the internal affairs of the State of Israel. Attached is a list of these organizations.

The European Union represents democratic states. Its democratic character is an inherent part of its nature. As such, it should refrain from any attempt to influence the internal democratic process of another democratic state.

We, the undersigned members of the Israeli Knesset, would like to express our shock and outrage at this attempt at achieving political purposes by extending financial support to Israeli citizens and groups.

As the elected representatives of a democratic, free society, we strongly oppose such attempts at influencing our state’s domestic politics and the policies of our government, by financial means.

In light of the gravity of these activities, we expect the European Union to take the following measures:

Discontinue the financial support to Israeli non-profit organizations that are politically oriented;

Publicly disclose the list of Israeli groups/institutions/organizations which receive financial support from the European Union. The citizens of Israel will thus be informed as to those organizations that are influenced by, or are serving foreign interests, and EU member-states will be apprised of the objectives of the of the expenditure of their money.

Considering that the European Union is a democratic institution, that represents free and democratic nations, we are certain that it will act out of similar respect for the sovereignty and freedom of the State of Israel.

Respectfully yours,

No./Title/Name/Faction in the Knesset

  1. Minister Nissim Dahan-Shas
  2. Minister Uzi Landau-Likud
  3. Minister Avigdor Liberman-National Union-Israel Beiteinu
  4. Minister Limor Livnat-Likud
  5. Minister Reuven Rivlin-Likud
  6. Minister Natan Sharansky-Israel Ba’aliya
  7. Minister Eliyahu Suissa-Shas
  8. Minister Rehavam Ze’evy-National Union-Israel Beiteinu
  9. Deputy Minister David Azoulay-Shas
  10. Deputy Minister Naomi Blumentha-lLikud
  11. Deputy Minister Yitzhak Cohen-Shas
  12. Deputy Minister Yuli-Yoel Edelstein-Israel Ba’aliya
  13. Deputy Minister Gideon Ezra-Likud
  14. Deputy Minister Meshulam Nahari-Shas
  15. Deputy Minister Abraham Ravitz-Yahadut Hatora
  16. Deputy Minister Yuri Shtern-National Union-Israel Beiteinu
  17. Deputy Minister Yitzhak Vaknin-Shas
  18. MK Moshe Arens-Likud
  19. MK Yigal Bibi-National Religious Party
  20. MK Ze’ev Boim-Likud
  21. MK Amnon Cohen-Shas
  22. MK Eliezer Cohen-National Union-Israel Beiteinu
  23. MK Haim Druckman-National Religious Party
  24. MK Michael Eitan-Likud
  25. MK Binyamin Elon-National Union-Israel Beiteinu
  26. MK Moshe Gafni-Yahadut Hatora
  27. MK Yitzhak Gagula-Shas
  28. MK Arieh Gamliel-Shas
  29. MK Shmuel Halpert-Yahadut Hatora
  30. MK Zvi Hendel-National Union-Israel Beiteinu
  31. MK Abraham Hirchzon-Likud
  32. MK Ofer Hugi-Shas
  33. MK Ayoob Kara-Likud
  34. MK Haim Katz-Am Echad
  35. MK Michael Kleiner-Herut
  36. MK Yechiel Lasry-Merkaz
  37. MK Maxim Levy-Gesher
  38. MK Yakov Litzman-Yahadut Hatora
  39. MK David Magen-Merkaz
  40. MK Rahamim Melloul-Shas
  41. MK Mordechai Mishani-Gesher
  42. MK Michael Nudelman-National Union-Israel Beiteinu
  43. MK Zevulun Orlev-National Religious Party
  44. MK Yair Peretz-Shas
  45. MK Meir Porush-Yahadut Hatora
  46. MK Ganady Riger-Israel Ba’aliya
  47. MK Itchak Saban-Shas
  48. MK Yuval Shteinitz-Likud
  49. MK Marina Solodkin-Israel Ba’aliya
  50. MK David Tal-Shas
  51. MK Shaul Yahalom-National Religious Party
  52. MK Nissim Zeev-Shas

Iranian airlift sends more arms to Hezbollah – via Damascus Int’l Airport

Iran has transfered hundreds of tons of weapons, ammunition and other materials to the Hezbollah through Syria in recent days, according to reliable sources. The deliveries were airlifted in by giant Antonov 124 transport planes that landed at Damascus International Airport.

The equipment was then transported to the storage facilities of the Revolutionary Guards in Lebanon, and to the Hezbollah. Security experts estimate that some of the equipment will be smuggled to Palestinian organizations in the territories.

Iranian assistance via Hezbollah to Palestinian organizations that attack Israel, is increasing. In addition to extensive efforts to smuggle equipment, weapons and ammunition, the Hezbollah has also started training Palestinian guerrillas in Hezbollah bases in the Beka’a Valley in Lebanon.

Intelligence also shows that the Hezbollah had direct links with Palestinian cells operating in the territories – in addition to the ties it cultivates with Fatah. One center for such links is the city of Nablus in the West Bank.

It is thought that the guerrilla infrastructure the Hezbollah is setting up in the territories is intended to be deployed to disrupt any future cease-fire agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

The large airlift is believed to be a response to the urgent need of the Revolutionary Guards and the Hezbollah for additional equipment in Lebanon.

The previous route used by the Iranians to airlift equipment to the Hezbollah in Lebanon crossed over Turkey. However, following a request by Ankara that Iranian flights over Turkey en route to Damascus declare the nature of their cargo, the flights were stopped. The current airlift is believed to have crossed over Saudi Arabian and Jordanian airspace on its way to Syria.

The pace of weapons transfers to the Hezbollah in Lebanon was shown in the past to be dictated by security developments in Lebanon. Following the withdrawal of the Israel Defense Forces from south Lebanon in May last year, Iran sought to replenish the military stores of the Hezbollah and the Revolutionary Guards stationed in Lebanon

According to Israeli estimates, the Hezbollah has some 7,000 Katyusha rockets.

This essay appeared in Ha’aretz on July 17, 2001

Official Palestine News Agency terms Orient House “the Palestine Liberation Organization’s headquarters in East Jerusalem”

Jerusalem – July 17 Wafa (Official Palestine News Agency) – Dozens of Israeli occupation police force surrounded “The Orient House”, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s headquarters in East Jerusalem and banned a memorial ceremony for the Martyr Faisal Husseini was to have been held.

Husseini, who held the portfolio for Jerusalem in the PLO, died in Kuwait of a heart attack about 40 days ago.

The Orient House issued a statement calling the occupation banning order “a provocation and a slander against the legacy of peace and tolerance represented by the late Faisal al-Husseini”. It said it would defy the ban and go ahead with the memorial ceremony.

The late Husseni, was the man who symbolized the Palestinian hopes of making the holy city the capital of a future state of Palestine, was buried at Haram al-Sharif.

This release was issued on July 17, 2001.

Israel Internal Security Chief Avi Dichter: ‘Israeli Arab demos prompted Intifada’

Israeli Arab demonstrations after then-opposition leader Ariel Sharon went to the Temple Mount last September prompted the Palestinian Intifada, Shin Bet Chief Avi Dichter told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee yesterday.

In his semi-annual briefing to the MKs, the head of Israel’s secret service said that the deaths of Israeli Arab demonstrators and subsequent incitement by the leadership of Israeli Arabs brought about the outbreak of the hostilities in the territories.

He said that there is a “worrisome” separatist movement growing in the Israeli Arab community, for both religious and nationalist reasons. According to Dichter, MK Azmi Bishara is one of the key leaders of the nationalist movement.

He said that most Israeli Arabs regard the events of last September and October as a mistake, but there is a growing emotional identification – within legal means – with the Palestinian Authority among Israeli Arabs.

Dichter gave the MKs a tour d’horizon of the state of the Palestinian organizations involved in hostilities against Israel. He said that Tawfik Tirawi’s General Intelligence force “co-opted” the Tanzim and Force 17, which were responsible for dozens of terror attacks against targets in the West Bank and inside Israel proper. But since last month’s cease-fire arrangements brokered by CIA chief George Tenet, Tirawi’s groups have ceased their terror activities, Dichter said. Tirawi’s people have begun taking preventive action, except that they don’t put suspects in jail but rather in “hotel-like” conditions. Furthermore, he said, the Palestinians are not conducting interrogations or investigations, which means there’s a limited intelligence picture about planned terror attacks.

By April 2000, there were indications that trouble was already brewing, he said, when some rank and file members of Palestinian security organizations, such as Mohammed Dahlan’s Preventive Security force in Gaza, began conducting terrorist activity. Eventually, Dahlan began commanding those operations. But since the Tenet agreement, he said, Dahlan’s organizations has ceased involvement, except for a few individuals.

A similar phenomenon took place with regard to the Tanzim, Fatah-related youth movement, which Dichter said was under the complete command of Yasser Arafat. Two organizations that have not taken part in any of the terror activity against Israel have been Jibril Rajoub’s Preventive Security force in the West Bank and the National Security force.

Dichter surprised the committee by saying that he favored a fence between Israel and the West Bank, similar to the one between Israel and Gaza.

A Jewish terror cell, not an underground

A Jewish terror cell is already operating in the territories, Dichter told the MKs, but he refrained from referring to it as a Jewish underground similar to the 27-member conspiracy that existed in the early 1980s and was eventually arrested by the Shin Bet.

He said that the cell has committed three shooting attacks on Palestinians in the Ramallah and Halhoul areas. One Palestinian was killed and four others wounded, he said.

Up until a few months ago there was a large measure of self-restraint on the part of Jews in the territories, but there has been an upsurge of anti-Palestinian activity, mostly in the form of vandalism, he said. The violent line in the settlement movement is led by members of Kach and Kahane Hai, as well as others in the radical right.

Dichter said that he handed over to the police the investigation into the explosion in Kach activist Noam Federman’s car, after reaching the conclusion that there were no “strategic” arms involved. The weapons found in the car on Monday were mostly “the type of equipment reservists who don’t respect the law take home from the army,” including smoke grenades, stun grenades and flares. He said the explosion was probably the result of poor handling of the material.

Grim numbers

Dichter summed up the Intifada’s statistics for the MKs, telling them that since the outbreak of the Intifada 136 Jews have been killed and 1,308 wounded by attacks, while 531 Palestinians have died, with 68 of them under the age of 16. This article ran in HaAretz on July 18, 2001

PLO War Plans Under Way

In Nablus, Jenin, and Gaza,they are preparing for war.

Officials in the Palestinian Authority fear that an Israeli invasion of PA territory will happen in a matter of days.

Their assumption is that Israel is waiting for an opportunity, like a large-scale terror attack similar to the one at the Dolphinarium, in order to recapture Palestinian territory and destroy the PA.

Commanders of Fatah and Hamas, and Palestinian army commanders as well, have already begun military preparations to frustrate an incursion of Israeli forces into PA territory. In Nablus, for example, they have begun manufacturing weapons, including mortars, and a warehouse for ammunition and weapons has been established.

According to Palestinian sources, Al-Najah University, considered a Hamas stronghold and an institution that has produced 16 suicide bombers so far, was closed after the attack at the Dolphinarium because of fear of occupation or bombardment, and only this week was it reopened. The sources also report that in Nablus, central figures in the city, including Hamas men, have been placed under heavy guard, and that the operational offices of the security organizations have been evacuated, along with civilian offices.

The main points of the operational plan in case of an Israeli invasion of PA territory were published in special Fatah and Hamas releases which were recently given to civilian leaders and commanders of the organizations, calling on them to be ready for combat.

The introduction to Fatah’s plan reads as follows: “The coming days are fateful, and we must be at a level of peak readiness in light of the possibility of an invasion by the Zionist enemy into some of the lands of the liberated homeland, in the framework of the criminal “Field of Thorns” [IDF code name] plan… The role of the fighters will be not just to stop the Israeli forces, but also to teach the enemy a different lesson than that of the children of the stones, bigger than that of the children of the RPG.”

The instructions that appear in the plan include the necessary preparations for the struggle and the rules of behavior and engagement against the Israeli army. The instructions reveal that the Palestinians are preparing for a prolonged conflict, based on the assumption that the Israeli forces will stay in Palestinian territory for a long period of time. Alongside details of the rules of combat, the plan also includes instructions on civilian matters such as medical care and food supplies. In any case, according to the directives, all activities must be carried out in full coordination with the branches of the Palestinian Authority.

Selections from the pamphlet released this week:

Operational instructions:

1. Members of Fatah and Hamas are requested to prepare “thousands of firebombs, of the ‘Molotov cocktail’ and ‘napalm’ variety with the help of experts.” Hamas instructs its people to “amass hand-grenades and firebombs and hide gas balloons and belts of explosives on roads and quality targets.” Hamas also directs its explosives experts to instruct the organization’s activists in the preparation of bombs, and calls on its people to prepare belts of explosives that will be given, when needed, “to any fighter prepared to die a martyr’s death among the enemy’s people.”

2. Preparations for blocking roads includes creating “roadblocks and obstacles by placing car wrecks, boulders, and containers on the sides of roads where tanks are expected to pass,” so that they can quickly be placed on the road when the Israeli invasion begins.

Instructions for combat:

1. Ammunition should be used sparingly. Using light weapons against tanks and APCs is forbidden; these should be attacked only with firebombs. The use of light weapons will be to attack foot patrols.

2. Strategic points should be manned by fighters and “by anyone who wants to die a martyr’s death in order to block the advance of the occupation army.”

3. An additional clause in the instructions for combat relates to planting bombs on the sides of roads.

Intelligence and security:

1. Teams of lookouts will for formed to spot movements of the Israeli army in areas where attacks are anticipated. The lookouts will report to headquarters while being wary of rumors and basing reports on eyewitnesses alone. All information should be checked with several sources, and only then should the roads be closed. [… ]

The article appeared on July 13, in Yediot Aharonot

PLO Security Chief Mohammad Dahlan Interviewed: “Most of the People in Israel Want War”

Just a few weeks after Ma’ariv published my colleague Ben Caspit’s exclusive story about Arafat’s instructions to kill settlers, the Arabic translation of the story was placed on the desk of Mohammed Dahlan, commander of the Preventive Security Service in the Gaza Strip. And he, how could he not, got angry.

“I don’t even want to respond to that. It is not connected to me. If you, at the newspaper, think that Arafat reprimanded me for trying to arrest Abdullah Shami, whereas at the time I was with Arafat in Portugal, then write whatever you want. Anyway you write only what Sharon wants you to write.”

Question: And yet, I am asking whether Arafat gave instructions to kill settlers?

“Kill? There is no such thing. Only in your dreams. The chairman’s instructions about the cease-fire are very clear and have not changed.”

Question: But it is enough for people among you to understand from Arafat that it is permissible to attack settlers.

“They do not have to understand anything at all. Our people do not need instructions from the chairman. As soon as they see the GSS and IDF killing and abducting people, they don’t care about the chairman’s instructions. They want to take revenge.”

Question: But you have to admit that the settlers have become your main target.

“Whoever wants to take revenge does not distinguish between a settler and a non-settler, and I am no longer trying to persuade the settlers or the people in Israel. For six years I tried to convince you and it didn’t help. Now the entire people in Israel wants war. You want war? All right then. What can we do, then?”

Question: Do you really believe that all the people in Israel want war?

“Most of the people in Israel. Maybe they don’t want a world war, but they treat the Palestinian people and the Palestinian Authority as an enemy.”

Question: Is it perhaps because most of the Palestinian people view the Israelis as enemies?

“I don’t think so. Every day I see that the people here want to do business with Israel and ask for exit permits.”

Question: Then there is a contradiction in what you are saying. On the one hand you are saying the Palestinians want to take revenge and on the other hand they want to do business with Israel.

“Some of them. But at this time, most of the people here have the impression that the IDF wants to destroy the Palestinian people, and they react accordingly.”

Question: Why did you boycott some of the security coordination meetings?

“When the chairman instructs me to attend, I go. But these meetings are not important. We can sit [and talk] like that for two years. Up until now that Israeli government simply does not want to end the violence because it does not want to address the real issues. If Sharon wanted, as soon as he lifted the closure, opened the Allenby Bridge and the airport at Rafah, people would have a reason to stop the violence.

“But if we continue to be locked up in the huge prison called the Gaza Strip, then there is no difference as far as we’re concerned whether we live or die. What is the difference between living in Gaza now or dying in the Intifada? It is the same thing.”

Question: I have one simple question to put to you. Why can seven days not go by without any violence and without the firing of one shot, so that we can move on to the next stage?

“There cannot be even one [such] day. It is like giving a small child the opportunity to prevent any agreement between us. After nine months of violence, many people here have lost brothers or sons. We are interested in stopping the violence, and we also have the ability to do so, but it is also connected to your behavior, when you kill and abduct people from Area

You tell me, how can I go to the Palestinian people and tell them that we have made progress towards peace, when this week alone 17 homes were demolished in Rafah and more houses in Shuafat.”

Question: But this week there was also a suicide bomber who came to Afula. Had he blown himself up, everything would have fallen apart.

“As far as I am concerned, don’t let anyone enter Israel. But you think that what the IDF is doing in Gaza and the West Bank prevents a suicide bomber from getting to Tel Aviv? 99% of the suicide operations took place during the closure. The closure is only intended as punishment for the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian people.”

Question: I will ask again, why can the fire and attacks not be stopped for seven days?

“You explain to me how this can be done.”

Question: You have 40,000 armed soldiers and policemen.

“Tell me how that is done on the ground, operationally speaking, when I cannot even get to Rafah with my officers. And furthermore, when you continue to kill, why would it be in my best interest to take action?”

Question: In 1996 you knew how to completely stop the attacks.

“That is true. Because then the whole world was helping us. I could move freely. And I also had a political interest there. What is your Sharon giving us now? He is giving us a closure.”

Question: If the quiet would be maintained for seven days, Israel would begin lifting the closure.

“Is Sharon capable of giving us seven days of quiet without killing us? Can he ensure that the settlers do not kill and do not abduct?”

Question: He can.

“That is not true. Not a single day goes by without someone being killed or wounded on our side.”

Question: Your deputy, Rashid Abu Shabak, is distributing weapons and mortars to everyone.

“When were mortars fired?”

Question: Just two days ago, into an Israeli community.

“We pledged to stop with the mortars and we are continuing with that. We succeeded in decreasing the firing, and we will stop it entirely. But you continue to demolish homes. What do you want of us?”

Question: Islamic Jihad and Hamas continue to perpetrate attacks in Israel. Do you understand that another attack like the Dolphinarium will cause everything to fall apart?

“We will make every effort so that such an attack does not recur. Believe me, we don’t want the Israeli people to pay the price the Palestinian people are paying because of the IDF attacks. I hope that nothing happens in Tel Aviv, but the situation is a difficult one.

“I assure you that if tomorrow morning the Palestinian people wake up and find that after nine months, the IDF has pulled back its APCs, opened the roads and the airport and is allowing people to travel from Nablus to Ramallah, do you know what will happen? That will be a positive shock, and it will not harm your security. The IDF can do that. Otherwise, even Sharon and Arafat will not be able to pull this wagon out of the mud.”

This article appeared in Maariv on July 13, 2001

The Associated Press Reveals the Lie of a Palestinian Doctor.

Israeli soldiers did not bar a Palestinian woman in labor from passing an Israeli checkpoint, her relatives said Thursday, refuting initial claims by two Palestinian doctors.

The baby boy was born in a taxi at the checkpoint Tuesday, and was dead on arrival at a nearby Palestinian clinic, the family said. A doctor said the boy suffocated because the family members assisting in the birth did not know how to keep his airway open.

The Israeli army had said in an initial response that the doctors’ claims were unfounded, but that it was investigating the case. The army reiterated Thursday that soldiers did not bar the woman from passing the checkpoint.

The events began Tuesday afternoon at a remote Bedouin encampment in the hills of the northern West Bank. Firial Dais, a resident of the encampment, went into labor and her father-in-law, Ali, went to the nearest highway, about 10 minutes away, to flag down a taxi.

Ali Dais, speaking to The Associated Press on Thursday, said it took him about 30 minutes to find a taxi. He said he, his wife and daughter-in-law got into the taxi and drove toward the village of Tubas which has a medical clinic.

En route, they came upon an Israeli army checkpoint, which was closed, to Palestinian traffic at the time. Dais, 50, said he did not alert soldiers at the checkpoint to the fact that his daughter-in-law was in labor, and when pressed, had no explanation.

Dais also said he did not remember how many cars, if any, were waiting at the checkpoint, adding that he was flustered by the situation.

The taxi had been waiting for about 15 minutes at the checkpoint when the woman gave birth, said Dais, who was herding his flock of sheep Thursday close to the village of Bardala, several kilometers (miles) from his encampment.

After the birth, the taxi driver walked up to the soldiers and explained the situation to them. They (the soldiers) asked whether it was a boy or a girl. They allowed us to pass, and we did, Dais said. The shepherd said that by the time they reached the Tubas clinic, the boy was dead.

The director of the clinic, Dr. Abdel Hassan Daraghmeh, told the AP on Wednesday that the taxi had been held up at the roadblock for an hour.

Asked to explain the discrepancy, Dr. Daraghmeh said Thursday that it was the driver, not the woman’s relatives, who informed him there had been a considerable delay at the checkpoint.

The family’s physician, Dr. Ghassan Hamdan, said initially that he delivered the baby at the checkpoint after soldiers prevented the mother from traveling to a hospital. But he later said he was not present for the birth and only heard of the case second-hand.