Fatah Tanzim Terrorize Palestinian Arab Citizens in Bethlehem and Beit Jalah

Israel Radio reported today that Israeli security sources say Palestinian Arabs living in Bethlehem and Beit Jalah are so frustrated with the reign of terror they are subjected to by Yasser Arafat’s Fatah Tanzim that they are providing Israel with information so that they might be stopped from attacking Israel.

The Palestinians are not just concerned about the return fire that Tanzim attacks draw to Palestinian neighborhoods, they also complain of Tanzim violence against their own community.

Recently a local Palestinian girl was raped by Tanzim members in the Tanzim’ s club in Beit Jalah. The girl’s family slaughtered her since the rape defamed the family. No action was taken against the rapists.

The report also noted that Tanzim collects protection money from local businesses. They also get payments from the PA for attacks against Israeli targets. The reporter observed that while Arafat may not be able to instantly halt Tanzim attacks, his control on the purse strings that PAY for the attacks enable him to put a halt on the action within a short period of time if he wants to.

Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director
IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)

This appeared on the May 16th, 2001 internet edition of “IMRA” at www.imra.org.il

MK Dr. Steinitz Demands: Disarm the PA – Rejects Call for Ceasefire

On Tuesday, May 8th, MK Dr Yuval Steinitz addressed a packed audience at the Israel Center in Jerusalem, at a news forum hosted by the Israel Resource News Agency.

Steinitz, a former Peace Now leader and now an influential force in the Likud, rejected any cease fire idea, demanding that Israel disarm the PLO and its armed forces that continue to attack Israel on all fronts.

Speaking in his capacity as the chairman of special Knesset Foreign and Security Relations subcommittee on Defence Planning and Policy, Dr. Steinitz stated that the PA has engaged in a policy of smuggling enough weapons to cripple the state of Israel.

Dr. Steinitz warned that “national security is much more important that personal security”, and asserted that any cease fire achieved in the short run would come at the expense of the need to strike at the source of the problem.

According to Dr. Steinitz, Israel had ignored the growth of the Palestinian security forces, from the agreed upon number in the 1993 “declaration of principles” of 9,000 to the agreed upon number of 24,000 under the second Oslo agreement of 1995, to 60,000 Palestinian soldiers are now under arms.

However, Steinitz asserted, the days of Israel ignoring the PA military preparations are over, since the PA is engaged in a well planned war of attrition that could last for many months and years – if Israel does not act immediately to stem the flow of weapons smuggling into the PA, by closing every artery of supplies, from the the PA airport in Gaza to every roadblock that can act a port of illegal arms supply.

Dr. Steinitz demanded that Israel increase its military pressure on the Palestinian security services, and called for the IDF to immediately attack PA army bases, PA ammunition dumps, PA officers and all the bunkers where weapons can be stored.

Dr. Steinitz conveyed a message to the media: to relate to the Palestinian Authority as a state in the making that is engaged in a low intensity war with Israel and not as a terror group firing pot-shots at civilians.

Dr. Steinitz indicated that the PA had crossed a “Cassus Belli” when it launched attacks on Jerusalem’s capital, and indicated that the time has come for Israel to consider a formal declaration of war against the PA.

In conclusion, Dr. Steinitz quoted peace process advocate Dr. Yose Beillin, who said from the rostrum of the Israel Knesset only nine months ago that an armed PA attack on a Jewish neighborhood in Jerusalem would as “unthinkable”, a red line that the PA would never cross, since an attack on a nation’s capital would be understood all over the world as an act of war.

Dr. Steinitz’s message: Israel is in a state of war and must act like it.

The Mitchell Report: “Balanced and Fair?”

In late October, 2000, US president Clinton appointed an international investigation commission to investigate the causes of the rioting in Israel, naming an Arab American and former US Senator, George Mitchell, as its chairman, and a Jewish-American, also a former US senator, Warren Rudman, to the panel, together with three prominent European diplomats.

Initial reaction in Israel to the publication of the Mitchell Commission report in May, 2001, evoked a sigh of relief that the Mitchell commission did not blame Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon for instigating the riots in September, 2000 during his visit to the Temple Mount.

However, even with that Sharon Temple Mount Accusation out of the way, the Mitchell Commission report accepted all of the other specious PLO premises for the current PLO insurrection.

The Mitchell commission accepted as a given that the PLO uprising is based on some based on some kind of movement for “independence and genuine self-determination”, without giving credence to the clearly stated PLO goal, stated in all PLO publications, maps and media outlets, even during the current Oslo process, which remains “liberation” of all of Palestine.

The Mitchell Commission characterizes the rioters armed with molotov cocktails as “unarmed Palestinian demonstrators”. a term that they seemed to have borrowed from several PLO information reports that have been published of late.

The Mitchell Commission takes the position that Israel’s security forces do not face a clear a present danger when faced with a mob trying to murder them with rocks and firebombs

The Mitchell Commission does not even mention that the PA has amassed 50,000 more weapons than they are supposed to have, in clear violation of the written Oslo accords, and not only the “spirit of the accords”, which seem to carry more weight with the Mitchell Commission.

The Mitchell Commission also accepts the notion that the Palestinian Authority security officials are simply not in control of their own tightly controlled security services,

The Mitchell Commission rejects the notion that the PA planned the uprising, as if the PA did not spend the past seven years preparing its media, school system and security services for any confrontation wit Israel.

The Mitchell Commission also describe an Israeli “view” that the PA leadership has made no real effort to prevent anti-Israeli terrorism, ignoring the message that Arafat has conveyed in his own media for the past seven years.

The Mitchell Commission also rejects Israel’s characterization of the conflict, as “armed conflict short of war”; (how else would you describe an army that fires mortar rounds into Israeli cities?)

The Mitchell Commission also rejects the IDF killing PLO combat officers during a time of war, without giving an alternative as to what actions the IDF is supposed to take in any such military confrontation.

Instead of issuing a clear call to the PLO to stop its sniper attacks on Israel’s roads and highways, the Mitchell Commission simply “condemns the positioning of gunmen within or near civilian dwellings”, leaving the observer to assume that PLO attacks from empty embankments would be acceptable.

The Mitchell Commission suggests that “the IDF should consider withdrawing to positions held before September 28, 2000,…to reduce the number of friction points”, ignoring the fact that this would leave the entry points to many Israeli cities without appropriate protection at a time of war.

The Mitchell Commission demands that Israel should transfer to the PA all tax revenues owed, and permit Palestinians who had been employed in Israel to return to their jobs, strangely recommending that Israel once again be in the position of paying the salaries of the armed PLO personnel who are now at war with Israel.

The Mitchell Commission takes a page out of Arab propaganda brochures when it calls on Israeli “security forces and settlers to refrain from the destruction of homes and roads, as well as trees and other agricultural property in Palestinian areas”, not even relating to the remote possibility that some areas of trees and agricultural land had been razed because it had given cover to the PA security forces during combat.

The Mitchell Commission accepts the notion that “settlers and settlements in their midst” remains a cause of the Palestinian uprising, because these Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria violate “the spirit of the Oslo process”, even though not one word appears in the actual Oslo accords would require the dismemberment of a single Israeli settlement anywhere.

In conclusion, the Mitchell Commission finds a connection between “settlement activities” and the Palestinian ability to resume and makes a judgment that negotiations cannot continue, so long as “settlement activities” continue, thereby introducing an excuse for the PLO to continue its armed conflict.

The Mitchell Commission accepts the notion that “settlers and settlements in their midst” remains a cause of the Palestinian uprising, because these Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria violate “the spirit of the Oslo process”.

The Mitchell Commission members know full well that not a word appears in the actual Oslo accords would require the dismemberment of a single Israeli settlement anywhere.

Yet for some reason, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres praised Mitchell Commission report as “balanced” and “fair”. Yassir Arafat, meeting with his political allies from Israel on May 11, stated that the Mitchell Report was the basis for renewal of negotiations between the parties.

Does this mean that the Israeli government will now accept the premise of the Mitchell Commission that negotiations with Arafat can only continue when Jewish community activity ceases in Judea, Samaria and Katif?

Is Peres acting on his own?

All this remains to be seen.

Two Funerals: Wednesday, May 9th, 2001

Thousands attended the double funerals held at the Gush Etzion Junction of 14 year old Yossef Ishran and Kobi Mandel, who were discovered in the early morning hours following a night long nerve wracking search.

The bodies were found next to the Haritun Caves, half buried under a pile of blood-soaked rocks with only their feet sticking out, a short distance from their homes in Tekoa. Next to their bodies were strewn their bags containing their uneaten sandwiches and water which they had taken with them on what was going to be a fun day of seeking out a suitable place to hold the traditional Lag B’Omer bonfire on Thursday night.

The massive crowd of mourners included hundreds of children, friends from the two schools which they attended in Efrat and Alon Shvut as well as their many friends from Tekoa. The crowd, who arrived for the scheduled 4:30 p.m. funeral was turned back after the loudspeaker announced that there would be a two hour delay of the funeral procession leaving Tekoa. In silence the huge crowd slowly emptied back into their cars and the buses. Only after returning to the funeral site did we learn the reason for the delay. Lab test results. Not satisfied with crushing the skulls of the two youngsters, the inhuman murderers continued to mutilate and abuse the bodies long after their last breaths were drawn. Those who discovered the bodies reported that the faces were so badly mutilated that they were no longer recognizable as human beings. The only way to make a definite identification was through fingerprints.

The massive crowd awaited the funeral procession that was on its way from Tekoa. Two stands awaited the bodies which would be laid out for the eulogies before being taken to the two respective cemeteries – Kobi would be laid to rest in Kfar Etzion and Yossef in Jerusalem. Psalms were chanted over the loudspeaker and the crowd chanted back the words of the psalms written centuries ago by King David – many of these psalms were written in the very caves near where the boys were found dead when King David hid in the Judean Desert caves when fleeing from King Saul and his soldiers.

A choked hush went through the crowd when the family was announced. The hundreds of children held on to each other, tears streaming down their faces. The mass of mourners, covering every inch of ground, parted like the Red Sea to make way for the families. The crowd made an audible gasp and broke into quiet sobs as first the small talit (prayer shawl) wrapped body of Yossef Ishran was brought forth and lowered onto the stand followed by his family who huddled around the body, hugging, holding and weeping over their dead son and brother. Then came the body of Kobi, wrapped in his father’s talit, the same one his father wore when he proudly held his first-born son Kobi at his circumcision ceremony when he was eight days old. Following came Kobi’s father, Seth, holding six year old Gabi in his arm while trying to hold on with his other hand to eleven year old Lilliana and twelve year old Daniel. The heartbroken sobs of the small children who stood over their big brother’s body was too much to bear. The whole crowd weeped along outloud. Then Kobi’s mother, Sheri was led/carried to the body of her first born child. The sight of the raw pain on her beautiful face cut like a knife into the hearts of all. Sheri, a talented author and teacher of creative writing lay her head down on her sons body weeping inconsolably and we felt like our hearts would break. For long moments we stood there crying, speechless. School children crying on their friends shoulders, adults, friends and family.

In his eulogy, Saul Goldstein, regional mayor of Gush Etzion, talked about the need to close down the PLO’s broadcasting networks where there are daily calls for murder of the Zionists and incitement against the Jews is broadcasted 24 hours a day.

Before the rocks, bullets, knives, bombs – it is the words that kill. Hate is contributed through education, incitement, the general environment. There is a direct connection between incitement calling for killing the Zionist enemy blasting daily from Palestinian media to Syria’s dictator Assad pointing at the Jews as Jesus’ murderer and humiliater of Prophet Muhammad, while his Defense Minister Dr. Mustafah Tallas was quoted in the L.B.C. Lebanese network saying “If every Arab kills a Jew, then there will be no more Jews”. He also said “I want to stand in place and kill the Jew standing opposite me”. This incitement goes along with Egypt’s very popular no. 1 hit number called: “I hate Israel”, played constantly over the Egyptian airwaves. This is the climate which produced the murderers who butchered two sweet beautiful innocent Jewish boys looking for a place to build a bonfire.

The children of Tekoa promised to hold their bonfires tonight at the site of the murder. The cave where the bodies were found is situated at the edge of the Judean desert, less than a kilometer from Tekoa. These big caves, the largest in the Middle East, where the prophet Amos, as is written, tended his flocks in “Tekoa” held all the mysteries and adventure of Adventureland. It was the place the children of Tekoa go to hang out, talk to wandering Bedoiuns tending their flocks, paint, meditate and celebrate the beauty of nature. For the children of Tekoa it was the extention of their backyards. The beautiful landscape this time of year is covered in the bloom of spring. Now it is sprinkled with blood.

Wake up Israel. Wake up world. Smell the blood.

Suha Arafat gives an interview to a Saudi paper

Suha Arafat, wife of the Palestinian Authority chairman, shoots off her mouth. “I hate the Israelis,” she declares. “I oppose normalization with them. Israeli women have attempted to make contact with me and I rejected them. I am giving an unequivocal message to all Israeli women proposing help for our institutions: you are responsible for the problems our children have. How do you dare to offer donations?”

After long months of media abstention, Suha Arafat has opened her mouth.

She does this in the Saudi women’s magazine Saidati, and the comprehensive interview is accompanied by a variety of personal photographs of the chairman’s wife and her family. The pretext for the project is a festive one: Suha set out, for the first time in her life, to undertake the Haj – the pilgrimage to the Muslim holy places in Saudi Arabia.

Suha, for her part, takes advantage of the opportunity to attack the Israelis verbally; to emphasize her unique status as the wife of Yasser Arafat, while also calling attention to the price she has to pay for this status; and also to make clear she is against the peace process. “I was never happy with the way negotiations with the Israelis were conducted,” she discloses. “The way things are now, I do not believe we will ever achieve true peace.

“Peace is a lie. I have always had the inner conviction that this matter will not succeed. Therefore I rejected any proposal to cooperate. In response, whenever I traveled between Gaza and the West Bank, the Israelis would stop my car and force me to wait along with the ordinary people.”

Arafat also has something to say about the IDF: “Despite the fact that Israeli soldiers shot at our house in Gaza, and my daughter and I were the target, they only hit the top floor. I know my daughter and I are a political target, and for that reason we travel from place to place. But I am not afraid, because my lengthy experience of life under the occupation has made me strong. However, I am not trying to endanger myself needlessly, just so that people will say I am heroic.”

Since the embarrassing incident with Hillary Clinton, which occurred a year and a half ago, Suha Arafat has kept silent. During a meeting in Ramallah with the former U.S. President’s wife, the chairman’s wife said accusingly that “Israel has poisoned the Palestinian air and water in the Gaza Strip and caused thousands of cases of cancer.” Her comments caused a big stir in the United States and the Middle East. Suha for her part, decided to lower her profile. She is now in Paris for longer periods of time and in Gaza less, and takes care to stay away from journalists. “I decided to stay away because the light of the cameras does not only dazzle, it also burns. The further away I stay, the better it is for me,” she says.

Now she is giving a glimpse into her life – it is unclear what is just image and what is really true – during a visit to Saudi Arabia, at the invitation of Princess Jawahara, wife of King Fahd. Aside from the attack on the Israelis, she also refers to the circumstances surrounding her decision – as the daughter of a wealthy and distinguished Christian family from Ramallah, educated in Nablus – to convert to Islam.

“My husband, Abu Amar, convinced me to take this step,” she says. “The Islamic religion is familiar to me from my days at school in Nablus. I would remain in class during religion classes and studied the Koran, like everyone else. When my family discovered that I had converted to Islam, they reacted logically. For all of us the most important issue is the Arab national interest. It is a struggle I have signed up for.”

This enlistment led to sharp disagreements, Suha disclosed, between herself and her husband. In the end she asked for his permission to move to Paris. “Of course there are differences of opinion between us,” she says. “No one wins in arguments, but I am more aggressive. I argue only when I know what I want. It is hard to influence Arab men. The Arab male is not influenced by a woman. It goes in one ear and out the other.”

The differences of opinion and arguments between the couple also dealt with Suha’s criticism of senior PA officials. “I am frank, and when I encounter a phenomenon that seems to me unhealthy, I can’t remain silent,” she says, ‘especially when I encounter corruption. I expose the issue, and sign up to stop the corruption.

“For example, I strongly criticized the opening of the casino in Jericho. I am not pleased with this place, where people drink alcohol and play cards. And when I discover senior Palestinian Authority officials making a fortune in the casino, I oppose them with all my might. Naturally, these arguments create a lot of problems and tension. But my conscience is clear.”

Suha Arafat provides diplomatic replies to questions regarding her relationship with her husband, which has already been at the center of quite a few rumors. During the interview she says: “The disagreements between us have not had an adverse effect on our strong relationship. He knows that the purpose of my criticism is positive.” On the other hand, she declares that “He loves me more, because it was he who proposed marriage.” Another time she smiles: “I am not afraid Arafat will marry another wife at the same time he is married to me. He doesn’t have the time.”

In response to the question what kind of husband Arafat is, Suha replies: “Arafat is well-bred and knows how to respect women. He loves his home and daughter very much, despite the fact that he does not have enough time for her. He is a quiet man. When I become angry, he remains calm. He is very emotional, despite the fact that when he appears in public he seems tough.”

Suha tries to evade questions abut her lengthy stay in Paris with her daughter Zahawa, who is now in first grade. A portrait of the two of them was intended to refute rumors that the wife and daughter were forced to move to Paris due to a malignant disease that little Zahawa had. She defined the relationship between father and daughter as “a good relationship”. But she admits Zahawa sees her father mainly on television. “She admires Arafat,” she concludes.

According to her, Zahawa fills her day. “Since she is Arafat’s daughter, and we are fearful for her, she is protected. I wanted to give her a brother or sister, but the great responsibility I have for her has given me pause. I am with her all the time, take her to school, accompany her everywhere. I try hard not to spoil her, and teach her that she must make efforts to achieve things and not rely on the fact that she is Abu Amar’s daughter.”

Suha defines Arafat’s health as “good”. Regarding the tremors in his lips, she explains that “this is the result of air pressure on airplanes. Arafat flies a lot from place to place, he is under pressure, and it is no wonder that this situation has had an affect on him. But he is not ill. The Israelis spread rumors about this, and we ignore them.”

It seems Suha has a great deal to say about rumors. “My unique status also has a price,” she complains. “Every move you make brings a wave of rumors and criticism, mainly rumors spread by Israelis, because of their continuing hostility.

Suha takes advantage of the interview to refute another rumor, that she used her position as the chairman’s wife to make financial profit for herself and her family. “I have never been in trade,” she announces, “and I never thought about doing business. I knew that any business transactions I would be involved in would lead to rumors that I was taking advantage of my husband’s status.

“In place of business, I decided to ease the plight of the Palestinian woman. I succeeded, for example, in raising awareness against inter-marriage in Palestinian society, to prevent cases of handicapped children. I put pressure on Arafat to help us legislate a law that would oblige couples to undergo pre-marital medical testing. Despite his many occupations, he found the time to handle this issue.”

In conclusion, Suha discloses that her best friends are Queen Rania of Jordan and the wife of the president of Tunisia, “because we lived there many years and she was very close to us.”

In response to the question whether she suffered in exile in Tunisia, she says: “We suffered a great deal, but we are also suffering in Gaza, we feel here too that we are living in exile. There is nothing that can be done, because we are still under the occupation.”

This appeared on the May 3, 2001 edition of Yediot Aharonot

PA Military Commander in Gaza Warns Israel

The Commander of the Palestinian forces in the Gaza Strip, Gen. Abed el-Razek el-Majaida had an interesting warning on Friday for the Palestinian population: Israel, he said, is not sufficing with placing cement blocks containing bombs which they detonate from afar, it is also now letting stolen cars into Gaza and the territories to turn them into car-bombs and blow up senior Palestinian officials. In other cases, the cars are fitted with special bugging devices. They do this by means of Palestinians who work for Israel “who’ve sold their souls to the devil and the occupation.” The Palestinian forces headquarters in the Gaza Strip called on the population not to come into contact with people trying to sell them stolen cars and to report such cases to the police.

This is not the first blood libel the Palestinians have made against Israel. The use of “depleted uranium” has not been dropped. The PA newspaper Al-Hayat al-Jadida quoted a report in the Dubai newspaper Albian on Sunday that it had managed to obtain samples of bomb fragments “which hit Palestinians in clashes with the occupation forces, which proved after analysis that Israel makes use of depleted uranium and six radioactive substances that do not appear in international scientific tables and which have never been published in any scientific research in the world.”

Since the fighting began, during which there were innumerable exchanges of fire between Gilo and Beit Jalla, the tranquil Christian village has become a ghost town. Many of the Christian residents have abandoned it, some have emigrated overseas, and all because the Fatah Tanzim have taken over the town.

A leaflet was circulated in Beit Jalla on Tuesday relating to the “inhuman deeds of some senior PA officials and national forces in the Beit Jalla area.” The Itim news agency reported that the leaflet, which was unsigned, was very harsh about the acts of several senior PA officials “interested in expelling the Christians from Beit Jalla at any price in order to seize their homes, which they believe will be destroyed by Israel as a response to Palestinian shooting on Gilo.”

Palestinian sources reported that in response to this anonymous leaflet, the PA forced several leaders of the Palestinian and Christian leadership of Beit Jalla and Bethlehem to publish a condemnation of it on the grounds that the leaflet was meant to “intensify the ethnic dispute between Christians and Moslems.” They accused Israel of being behind the leaflet.

This appeared on the May 2, 2001 edition of Hatzofeh

“Follow Me”

“I am waving not to part from you, but to say: follow me,” so the Palestinian boy Mohammed a-Dura ostensibly calls to his friends the children, in a film clip produced by the Palestinian Ministry of Propaganda which has recently been broadcast on official Palestinian television. Ten year old a-Dura, who was killed next to his father at the beginning of the el-Aksa Intifada and become one of its symbols, calls to Palestinian children and proposes that they become shahids [martyrs].

This comes from new research into “Palestinian Culture and Society”. The research director, Itamar Marcus, presents a number of official Palestinian film clips for children and discloses that despite its denials, the Palestinian Authority encourages its children in violent operations against Israel, and in return promises them the delights of heaven.

The official clip about a-Dura shows how immediately after his death, the boy went to heaven, a tranquil place with lots of green vegetation, fountains, beaches, and even a Ferris wheel. Little a-Dura, according to the clip, skips joyously in the sunlight, flying a kite, while in the background a song is playing: “How delightful the scent of the shahids, how delightful the scent of the earth, slaked by the flow of blood flowing from a fresh body.”

Another clip mentioned by Marcus shows the famous handshake between Rabin and Arafat at the White House, and above it says “The promise of peace is over, the time for talk is over.” In the clip, also intended for Palestinian children, and broadcast on the official Palestinian Authority television network, a boy and a girl can be seen. The boy throws aside the little car he was holding and picks up a stone, while the girls leaves her doll and also takes a stone in order to set out for the conflict.

This appeared on the May 4, 2001 edition of Maariv

Citibank Offers Ehud Barak a Top Position

Citi Bank, one of the largest banks in the U.S., has offered former Prime Minister Ehud Barak a position as special adviser to the bank’s branch in Israel.

It is customary in the U.S. to hire former senior officials as consultants for financial groups.

The assumption is that their status canhelp business. Thus for example, Merrill-Lynch hired former Bank of Israel Governor Ya’akov Frenkel.

Yedioth Ahronoth has learned that Barak received the initial offer on Independence Day, at a social event where he met with the president of CitiBank in Israel.

Last week, Barak met with top bank executives in Israel.

The bank spokesman did not deny there were initial contacts but said nothing had been decided.

This appeared on the May 3, 2001 edition of Yediot Aharonot

The Continuing Cooperative Relationship

More often than not, when you hear a news report of an Arab terror attack in Israel, the news reporter will say that this attack was the result of Islamic extremists, whether they are from the Hamas or the Islamic Jihad. The announcer usually declares – deadpan – that Arafat?s agencies, the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organiztion) and Arafat’s administrative arm, the PNA (Palestinian National Authority), are simply not involved. The rationale, after all, for Israel and Western countries to arm Arafat’s security forces was that he would use such arms to crush Islamic terror organizations.

Almost eight years ago, when Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin shook hands with Yassir Arafat on the White House lawn, most people in Israel and abroad expected that Arafat would form a new Arab entity to restrain the violent Moslem movements known as Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

That was the rationale behind what later became known as the Oslo Peace Process, wherein Israel was expected to cede land for a new Palestinian Arab entity, while Arafat’s PLO was expected to fight Hamas/Islamic Jihad and other Arab terror groups that continued to threaten the lives of Jews in Israel.

Yet, from day one, the opposite has occurred: instead of cracking down on Hamas, Arafat has created an alliance with them. When I asked him about Hamas at his press conference in Oslo where he was about to receive the Nobel Peace Prize in December, 1994, Arafat answered, “Hamas are my brothers. I will handle them in my own way”.

And when the PLO celebrated its thirtieth anniversary in January, 1995, Arafat delivered a series of lectures to his own people in Gaza and in Jericho, praising suicide bombers and refusing to condemn the spate of Hamas terror attacks which had taken place at the time Arafat’s speeches of praise for Hamas were televised by the new Palestinian TV network, the Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation, that is owned, controlled and operated by Arafat himself. Video cassettes of Arafat?s harangues became popular in the Palestinian Arab open market.

Arafat?s strategy was best summed up by U.S. Ambassador to Israel and presidential confidante Martin Indyk, who told the Los Angeles Times on March 1, 1996, that Arafat had decided to co-opt, rather than to fight, the Hamas. Arafat’s co-option of the Hamas was not only in words but in deeds.

On May 9, 1995, our news agency dispatched a Palestinian correspondent to cover the Gaza press conference held by Arafat?s local Palestine Liberation army police chief Ghazzi Jabali, in which the representatives of Arafat?s Palestine Authority officially announced that they would license weapons for the Hamas – this, only one month after Hamas had carried out an attack on an Israeli civilian bus near Gaza, killing six young Israelis and one American student, Aliza Flatow. Two days after that attack, the Voice of Israel carried a news item that the PA would indeed licence weapons for the Hamas. That news item was soon changed from “license” to “confiscate”.

At Jabali’s packed press conference, carried live on PBC radio, Jabali announced that Hamas leaders such as Dr. Muhammed Zahar – who was present at the meeting – would be allowed and even encouraged to own weapons under the protection of the Palestine Authority. On the same day, our Palestinian TV crew filmed an armed Zahar, standing in front of a skull and crossbones imposed on a map of Israel, as he addressed an angry mob in Gaza and called for the bloody overthrow of the State of Israel. PA police chief Jabali would later assure the Associated Press on May 14, 1995 that he was expecting Hamas and Islamic Jihad to “keep their licensed weapons at home”.

In late October, 1995, shortly before Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination, I asked him at a public forum about Arafat?s decision to provide weapons to the Hamas. Rabin acknowledged that this practice existed and quipped, “Maybe they’re for peace, too”.

For the past six years both Hamas and Islamic Jihad have openly operated with weapons licensed by the P.A. Meanwhile all levels of Arafat?s miliary forces acknowledge that they have recruited radical Islamics to join forces with them.

Arafat?s alliance with Hamas was exposed when the semi-official Egyptian newspaper Al Aharam broke the story of the formal PLO-Hamas accord, signed between the two organizations on December 15, 1995, in Cairo. That accord allowed Hamas to carry out attacks in “areas of Palestine that had not yet been liberated”. PLO General Secretary Marwan Bargouti, justifying a Hamas attack at a bus stop on the outskirts of Netanya, appeared on Saudi Arabia’s MBC TV and explained that the PLO could not condemn such an act since the territory “was not yet liberated” by the PLO.

And on each occasion when Arafat was asked to “crack down” on these Islamic groups that took credit for fatal terror bombs against Israel, he ordered the mass roundups that resulted in mass confessions followed by mass release of prisoners.

In thirty-seven documented instances since 1994, the Palestine Authority has offered asylum to Hamas and Islamic Jihad members who murdered Israelis and took refuge in the new safe havens of Palestinian Arab cities that were protected by Arafat’s armed forces.

Under pressure from Israel and Western countries, Arafat eventually did arrest twenty-two Hamas members who had been involved in bus bombings throughout Israel between 1994 and 1996 – all of whom were released at the latest round of riots that broke out in September, 2000.

A case in point. Muhammad Deif roams Gaza freely, armed and at liberty. Deif is the admitted Hamas mastermind of the October, 1994 kidnapping and killing of Nachshon Wachsman, the nineteen-year-old American Israeli. When I asked Arafat?s commander of the Palestine Liberation Army about Deif, he told me that he was under direct orders from Yassir Arafat not to touch Deif.

This, despite the fact that U.S. President Bill Clinton declared at Nachshon Wachsman?s grave in March, 1996, that Israel should not continue any negotiating process with Arafat and the Palestine Authority until and unless Arafat hands over Deif to stand trial.

Many close followers of the Middle East situation wrongly assume that the two entities – the PLO and the Hamas – are in conflict when, in fact, they closely coordinate every move under the administrative framework of the Palestinian National Authority, which represents the Palestinian state-in-the-making.

Our news agency has obtained a copy of the PNA-approved constitution of the new Palestinian state, jointly agreed upon by the PLO and the Hamas. That document, whose cover page thanks UNESCO and the Italian government for funding its law committee, declares that Islam will be the state religion of Palestine, that its borders will encompass all of Palestine – not just the west bank and Gaza – and that no other religion will have any status in the future Palestinian state.

And yet an unwritten rule seems to exist in the media – even in the Israeli press – to downplay any reportage of the PLO-Hamas alliance and their confluence of objectives.

A Moslem Condemns the Use of Children

Almost eight years ago, when Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin shook hands with Yassir Arafat on the White House lawn, most people in Israel and abroad expected that Arafat would form a new Arab entity to restrain the violent Moslem movements known as Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

That was the rationale behind what later became known as the Oslo Peace Process, wherein Israel was expected to cede land for a new Palestinian Arab entity, while Arafat’s PLO was expected to fight Hamas/Islamic Jihad and other Arab terror groups that continued to threaten the lives of Jews in Israel.

Yet, from day one, the opposite has occurred: instead of cracking down on Hamas, Arafat has created an alliance with them. When I asked him about Hamas at his press conference in Oslo where he was about to receive the Nobel Peace Prize in December, 1994, Arafat answered, “Hamas are my brothers. I will handle them in my own way”.

And when the PLO celebrated its thirtieth anniversary in January, 1995, Arafat delivered a series of lectures to his own people in Gaza and in Jericho, praising suicide bombers and refusing to condemn the spate of Hamas terror attacks which had taken place at the time Arafat’s speeches of praise for Hamas were televised by the new Palestinian TV network, the Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation, that is owned, controlled and operated by Arafat himself. Video cassettes of Arafat?s harangues became popular in the Palestinian Arab open market.

Arafat’s strategy was best summed up by U.S. Ambassador to Israel and presidential confidante Martin Indyk, who told the Los Angeles Times on March 1, 1996, that Arafat had decided to co-opt, rather than to fight, the Hamas. Arafat’s co-option of the Hamas was not only in words but in deeds.

On May 9, 1995, our news agency dispatched a Palestinian correspondent to cover the Gaza press conference held by Arafat?s local Palestine Liberation army police chief Ghazzi Jabali, in which the representatives of Arafat?s Palestine Authority officially announced that they would license weapons for the Hamas – this, only one month after Hamas had carried out an attack on an Israeli civilian bus near Gaza, killing six young Israelis and one American student, Aliza Flatow. Two days after that attack, the Voice of Israel carried a news item that the PA would indeed licence weapons for the Hamas. That news item was soon changed from “license” to “confiscate”.

At Jabali’s packed press conference, carried live on PBC radio, Jabali announced that Hamas leaders such as Dr. Muhammed Zahar – who was present at the meeting – would be allowed and even encouraged to own weapons under the protection of the Palestine Authority. On the same day, our Palestinian TV crew filmed an armed Zahar, standing in front of a skull and crossbones imposed on a map of Israel, as he addressed an angry mob in Gaza and called for the bloody overthrow of the State of Israel. PA police chief Jabali would later assure the Associated Press on May 14, 1995 that he was expecting Hamas and Islamic Jihad to “keep their licensed weapons at home”.

In late October, 1995, shortly before Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination, I asked him at a public forum about Arafat?s decision to provide weapons to the Hamas. Rabin acknowledged that this practice existed and quipped, “Maybe they’re for peace, too”.

For the past six years both Hamas and Islamic Jihad have openly operated with weapons licensed by the P.A. Meanwhile all levels of Arafat?s miliary forces acknowledge that they have recruited radical Islamics to join forces with them.

Arafat?s alliance with Hamas was exposed when the semi-official Egyptian newspaper Al Aharam broke the story of the formal PLO-Hamas accord, signed between the two organizations on December 15, 1995, in Cairo. That accord allowed Hamas to carry out attacks in “areas of Palestine that had not yet been liberated”. PLO General Secretary Marwan Bargouti, justifying a Hamas attack at a bus stop on the outskirts of Netanya, appeared on Saudi Arabia’s MBC TV and explained that the PLO could not condemn such an act since the territory “was not yet liberated” by the PLO.

And on each occasion when Arafat was asked to “crack down” on these Islamic groups that took credit for fatal terror bombs against Israel, he ordered the mass roundups that resulted in mass confessions followed by mass release of prisoners.

In thirty-seven documented instances since 1994, the Palestine Authority has offered asylum to Hamas and Islamic Jihad members who murdered Israelis and took refuge in the new safe havens of Palestinian Arab cities that were protected by Arafat?s armed forces.

Under pressure from Israel and Western countries, Arafat eventually did arrest twenty-two Hamas members who had been involved in bus bombings throughout Israel between 1994 and 1996 – all of whom were released at the latest round of riots that broke out in September, 2000.

A case in point. Muhammad Deif roams Gaza freely, armed and at liberty. Deif is the admitted Hamas mastermind of the October, 1994 kidnapping and killing of Nachshon Wachsman, the nineteen-year-old American Israeli. When I asked Arafat’s commander of the Palestine Liberation Army about Deif, he told me that he was under direct orders from Yassir Arafat not to touch Deif.

This, despite the fact that U.S. President Bill Clinton declared at Nachshon Wachsman’s grave in March, 1996, that Israel should not continue any negotiating process with Arafat and the Palestine Authority until and unless Arafat hands over Deif to stand trial.

Many close followers of the Middle East situation wrongly assume that the two entities – the PLO and the Hamas – are in conflict when, in fact, they closely coordinate every move under the administrative framework of the Palestinian National Authority, which represents the Palestinian state-in-the-making.

Our news agency has obtained a copy of the PNA-approved constitution of the new Palestinian state, jointly agreed upon by the PLO and the Hamas. That document, whose cover page thanks UNESCO and the Italian government for funding its law committee, declares that Islam will be the state religion of Palestine, that its borders will encompass all of Palestine – not just the west bank and Gaza – and that no other religion will have any status in the future Palestinian state.

And yet an unwritten rule seems to exist in the media – even in the Israeli press – to downplay any reportage of the PLO-Hamas alliance and their confluence of objectives.

This appeared on the May 3rd, 2001 edition of Washington Post