Looney Tunes

I remember as a youngster (last century) that one of the “shorts” always shown in the cinema before the main feature film was a series of cartoons called Looney Tunes.

These consisted of the likes of “Bugs Bunny” and other such cartoon characters doing zany and mad things to the accompaniment of frenetic music and inane dialogue.

No doubt that is why the Wikipedia definition of “Looney Tunes” is given as “crazy and deranged.”

I can think of no better description of current events, both here in Israel and internationally. Like the cinema cartoons of my youth, the present performances are a foretaste of what is yet to come in the main feature.

As the civil year of 2023 is now well underway, we face several challenging scenarios. These include reforms in various domestic areas such as the economy, the justice system, health and welfare, just to mention a select few. Looming over all these subjects is the need to tackle other thorny problems in the political and religious spheres.

As though these tasks are not difficult enough, we also face the traumatised reactions of those who feel hard done by as a result of the election outcome.

Any of these items would be a major task on their own.

As nothing is simple or straightforward in this part of the world, one needs to add in two particular volatile and potentially explosive threats. Either one threatens to blow all other problems literally out of the sky unless a permanent solution is found and dealt with.

I am referring to the threats posed by a nuclear Iran and the continuing promoting of terror by those whom the international community insists on crowning as “peace partners.”

Both of these threats to Israel and its citizens are long-standing.

Thanks to the fact that those who should have dealt with them preferred instead to sweep the problem under the carpet, we now face a far more lethal situation. Weak international leadership, naïve policies which rewarded terror facilitators and irredeemable appeasement of bullies has resulted in the current fiasco.

All you have to do is tune in to the discordant voices issuing forth from the usual suspects, and you will get an inkling of why we have arrived at the farcical situation we face today.

Day in and day out, the Biden Administration and the Europeans reminded us that “diplomacy is the best way to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions.” Every time doubt was cast on this specious assertion, we were accused of creating unnecessary panic and over-inflating the threats. None of the US or European genius policymakers, and certainly not the UN, was ever able to explain how diplomacy had succeeded in preventing North Korea from acquiring nuclear bombs.

Lo and behold, after endless hymns of praise for diplomatic impotency, not long ago, the US Secretary of State admitted that “Tehran is making very significant progress on its nuclear program.”

Shortly after this not-surprising revelation, the International Atomic Energy Agency announced that “Iran now has enough nuclear material to make several nuclear bombs.”

Anyone knowledgeable of the appeasement policies followed by the democracies when Nazi Germany was rearming will instantly recognise the eerie and dangerous similarities. The tragedy is that the ignoramuses in charge today prefer to ignore the lessons of the recent past. They will all wax eloquently on Holocaust Remembrance Day and conveniently overlook the fact that their deliberate negligence is leading to a repeat performance.

There are no prizes for anticipating the oratorios of outrage, which will burst forth when Israel finally takes action to thwart the Mullah regime.

The other threat we face is a long-running one. Terror against a Jewish sovereign presence did not start in 1967 after the 6-Day War. The media has helped to spread the myth that the so-called “occupation” and reactions to it only developed after that campaign to annihilate us. Ignorant politicians and others subverted by historical lies bellow lemming-like slogans about settlements. What all of them either do not know or deliberately refuse to acknowledge is the stark truth that terror against Jews has been a long-running feature.

Since at least the 1920’s murdering Jews has been the standard policy of those opposed to a Jewish presence here. In 1947 when the Arabs rejected the UN partition plan, acts of violence increased, and in 1948 full-scale war broke out as the Arab States attempted to snuff out the newly recreated Jewish State. There has not been one year since then when Israelis have not been targets of terror.

At memorials to murdered Jews throughout the civilised world, politicians speak eloquently and eulogise the victims of Jew hate and incitement. Unsaid and deliberately omitted is any reference to the fact that past indifference contributed to the various pogroms and massacres.

Is it not amazing, therefore, that when Israel, the target of over 75 years of the same delegitimisation and hate, decides to fight back, these same politicians, media and protest groups dissolve into a frenzy of condemnation?

The latest terror outrage in Jerusalem is a perfect case in point.

Like clockwork, the scripted set of phrases flowed forth. First, a ritual expression of horror at the murder of Jews as they attended synagogue services on Shabbat. With that off their collective chests, the long-discredited chorus of “cycles of violence” took over. Israel is admonished to show restraint and not “overreact.” The Pope expressed worry about the “increasing death spiral in Israel and the West Bank.” Biden spouted that the attack “targeted the civilised world.” Others, from Macron to the UN Secretary-General voiced similar sentiments.

Has anyone noted some glaring omissions?

The attack specifically targeted Jews. Using the words “civilised world” sounds so much more parev.

Not one of those lecturing us on how we should behave in the face of terror mentioned several inconvenient facts. Palestinian Arabs in the PA and Gaza celebrate with candies and fireworks. Not a single politician wondered how a 13-year-old was so brainwashed that he could murder Jews. Nobody queried why school textbooks incite against Israel and Jews. Not a single “eytzes” giver condemned Abbas for refusing to speak up because in his own words “it would be political suicide.” Instead, this “dove of peace” blames Israel for the terror he himself fosters and is embraced by UN members.

Most telling of all, not a peep has been uttered against the payment by the PA of stipends to those who murder Jews. That says it all.

The terrorists are proud of the fact that they are, as reported by PMW, “soldiers of the PA.” Wouldn’t you think that this might attract some sort of outraged condemnation?

Instead, we have to listen to the US Secretary of State leading the international refrain lauding a two-State solution, lamenting Israel’s attempt at thwarting it and condemning Jews for living on their historical land. As an added bonus, Blinken articulates a moral equivalency between the victims and those who are killed while perpetrating terror.

It is definitely Looney Tune time again.

Perspective from Azerbaijan

First of all I would like to condemn the terrorist attack on the Azerbaijani embassy in Tehran. Attack on diplomatic missions is unacceptable and the Iranian regime bears a responsibility for this. 

Secondly, I also condemn the terror attack on civilians in Jerusalem which happened near a synagogue on Shabbat last week and convey my condolences to families of terror victims.  

 

Almost 2 months passed since the Azerbaijani eco-activists started  to hold a protest on the Lachin-Khankendi road against the Armenian eco-terror in Azerbaijan. The failure of the Russian peacekeeping contingent to prevent the illegal exploitation of natural resources in Karabakh has resulted in the ongoing protest on the major road that passes by Shusha. As a result of the negotiations with the Russian peacekeeping command, the delegation consisting of specialists from the ministries of Economy, Ecology and Natural Resources, the State Property Service under the Ministry of Economy, and “AzerGold” company was to conduct a preliminary monitoring of the illicit exploitation of mineral deposits in Karabakh, where peacekeepers are temporarily deployed, as well as related environmental and other problems. However, due to the inaction of the peacekeepers, the monitoring did not take place and resulted in the continuous protest of the Azerbaijani eco-activists which continues to this day.

 

After the victory of Azerbaijan in the Second Karabakh war that resulted in liberation of the internationally recognized territories of Azerbaijan from the Armenian occupation, which lasted for about three decades, Azerbaijani government launched an assessment of losses Armenia had caused to Azerbaijan over the years of occupation in various aspects, including devastating environmental damage.

Armenia committed unprecedented destruction in Karabakh and surrounding regions, which were kept under occupation for about 30 years by it, razed historical-religious monuments to ground, carried out vandalism acts against cemeteries, thus, tried to remove signs of Azerbaijanis in these areas completely, besides purposeful destruction of historical, cultural, religious heritage belonging to Azerbaijanis, who settled in its territory historically. Moreover, Armenian aggression resulted in significant disruption of the environment of the whole region of the South Caucasus. In fact, deliberate clearance and burning of forests, pollution of waters, destruction of flora and fauna, and ruthless squandering of natural resources have disorganized the environmental balance. Furthermore, illegal business and exploitation of natural resources during the years of occupation made a huge economic damage with subversive environmental divarication.

 

Protesters from all walks of life have been vigorously rallying against the illegal exploitation of Azerbaijan’s mineral resources in the Karabakh economic region by ethnic Armenian separatists in collaboration with Armenia’s various governments for over 30 years.

At a conservative estimate, Armenians, hand in hand with offshore and European companies, have illegally pocketed billions of dollars from plundering Azerbaijan’s mineral resources both in Karabakh and around during the 30-year-long occupation and continued the same scheme of theft of gold, molybdenum, copper, and other mineral resources after the war under the supervision and in collaboration with the Russian peacekeepers.

The Azerbaijani public has finally decided to say enough is enough and halt the continuous plunder, and thus on December 12, 2022, a group of eco-activists took to the streets to say this is the last straw. And they succeeded in it by kicking off open-ended pickets on the Lachin road through which Azerbaijani wealth from the interior of the earth has been transported to Armenia for further processing.

One of the fundamental reasons for the international support for the Armenian claims now is the similarity of the business interests of certain political groups in Europe with those in Armenia and separatist Karabakh in the illegal exploitation of Azerbaijan’s mineral resources.

 

Of course, the illegal exploitation of our natural resources is an undeniable fact. We have the names of companies. I must say that if the companies that illegally exploited our gold and other deposits do not pay compensation, this issue will go to court. If they do not deliver this compensation, all the cases will go to international courts, and they will be humiliated.

 

It is unfair to call the events on the Lachin-Khankandi road a blockade. Up to 1000 trucks belonging to Russian peacekeepers have passed along the road. 

Surely, they carry food and necessary items for people living there. We don’t protest it. Our purpose is not blockade. So it’s just another anti-Azerbaijan show. I can’t find another name for this. Armenians and their sponsors think that they’ll achieve something by using it against us. But they won’t achieve anything. We have legitimate demands.

The young people who protest on the Lachin-Khankandi road are our pride. They are there day and night in frosty and snowy weather, they demand their rights and once again show the whole world how high-quality the Azerbaijani youth are. The separatists are busy spreading completely false information to the world.

 

Azerbaijani activists are not preventing the transit of civilian and humanitarian transportation. But the separatists in Karabakh are using the situation to show shortages of food and the threat of a ‘humanitarian catastrophe’ and blaming Azerbaijan and the activists for it.

Three pieces with the right questions to ask about EU funding of PA/UNRWA education

Response of  ​​the EU Dept of  Foreign Affairs and Security Affairs

Regarding your questions, the EU is firmly committed to promote inclusive and quality education for the Palestinian people, including to ensure full adherence with the United Nations values and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco) standards and norms in the field of education and in all education material.Since 2021, the EU has stepped up its engagement with the Palestinian Authority in this regard. The Palestinian Authority must ensure the highest standards in fostering a culture of peace and coexistence paving the way for a future where the conflict can be solved through negotiations leading to a two-state solution.

 

The EU has no tolerance for incitement to hatred and violence, as means to achieve political goals, the glorification of ‘armed resistance’ and antisemitism in all its forms. Any material that goes against these principles risks undermining peace and coexistence and has no place in textbooks or classrooms. This position was reiterated recently in the statements published following the latest events in Jenin and Jerusalem.

**

The EU and other European donors collectively support the Palestinian education sector and the provision of quality services in a wide range of ways. The EU does not fund any textbooks. There are no UNRWA textbooks. UNRWA always uses the textbooks of the host in question. It regularly reviews the textbooks and learning materials used in UNRWA schools under its Curriculum Framework, which aims to ensure that the curriculum is in line with UN values….  

******************* 

​My response to  ​​the EU Dept of  Foreign Affairs and Security Affairs

*Concerning the claim that UNRWA “aims to ensure that the curriculum is in line with UN values”:

*Is the presentation of  a woman who murdered more than 30 people as a role model in a PA/UNRWA text book in line with UN values?

*Is the eradication of every Jewish community on both sides of the 1949 UN armistice lines in line with UN values?

*Is there evidence that UNRWA actually reviews texts taught to their students?:

No EU answer to my response.


1388 words, incl. illustrations

Concrete examples of undesired material that the EU might address

  1. The total absence of the State of Israel – a fully recognized sovereign state world-wide – from all maps. Instead, the whole country is presented as “Palestine” politically. Israel’s pre-1967 territory presented as “Palestinian territories occupied in 1948”, which insinuates the goal of total annihilation of Israel, rather than peaceful co-existence with it.
  2. De-legitimization of the presence of Israel’s 7 million Jewish citizens, as their cities – including Tel Aviv – do not appear on the map, which insinuates the desire to make them “disappear” eventually and contradicts the ideal of peace and co-existence.
  3. Denial of Jewish history in the country, including the existence of archaeological relics that prove that.
  4. Denial of the Jews’ historical and religious ties to their ancient-modern capital Jerusalem, including the “neglect” to mention the very name “Jerusalem” (Urushalim in Arabic) in a brief review of the city’s names throughout history.
  5. Non-recognition of the Jews’ holy places in the country, chief among them being the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem, which is presented as an exclusively Muslim holy place.
  6. Falsification of an historical item by erasing the Hebrew inscription from it.
  7. Demonization of Jews by describing them as “the Devil’s aides” in the context of Al-Aqsa Mosque, or “enemies of God’s prophets”, which is tantamount to incitement to murder within a traditional society from which most of the Palestinian school students come.
  8. Instilling in the children’s minds the obligation to free Palestine in its entirety, not just the areas of the West Bank and Gaza. Palestinian cities within Israel’s pre-1967 territory should be returned to Palestinian rule: Jaffa in this example.  
  9. “Armed resistance” is the way of the full liberation of Palestine. The female-commander of the most ferocious terrorist attack on an Israeli civilian bus in 1978, which ended in the murder of over thirty Israeli civilians – men, women and children – is made a role-model for Palestinian children.

 

These specific examples are taken from schoolbooks that were published by the Palestinian Authority in 2020 and are in use today, also in the UNRWA schools.

Some of these examples were not noticed by the Georg Eckert Institute researchers. 

Others were duly addressed by them and appeared in their report, while still others were explained away in one way or another. We, on our part, tend to view these examples as indications of a comprehensive indoctrination trying to negate the “other” to the point of extinction. 

Either way, our question remains: Will  the EU indeed implement  its own policies and  demand the removal of the following incitement from the PA/UNRWA educational system that it finances:.


Asking the European Union About Funding Palestinian education

David Bedein, MSW, Director

 

As the head of the Nahum Bedein Center for Near East Policy Research,  have covered the Palestinian Authority school system since the very first day that the PA began to issue its own textbooks on August 1, 2000. Having met with and received personal authorization from Yassir Arafat to receive and review all textbooks  issued by the Palestinian Authority and used by UNRWA schools in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and Gaza, the center engaged Dr. Arnon Groiss to review more than 1,000 school books issued by the PA. 

Dr. Groiss, fluent in Arabic, holds  a Phd in Islamic Studies from Princeton University, and a masters degree in public administration at Harvard, and served as the deputy director of Arab language services at the Israel Broadcasting Authority. In that  context, asked the EU spokesman if the EU would take proactive steps to remove incitement from PA and UNRWA schools. 

This is the EU  response: “The 2022 assistance package in support of Palestine was adopted on 16 December 2022. Education was not included in the incentivebased tranche of the PEGASE mechanism. The EU remains firmly committed to promoting inclusive and quality education for the Palestinian people, including to ensuring full adherence with the United Nations values and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco) standards and norms in the field of education and in all education material. The Palestinian Authority must ensure the highest standards in fostering a culture of peace and coexistence paving the way for a future where the conflict can be solved through negotiations leading to a two-state solution. The EU has no tolerance for incitement to hatred and violence, as means to *achieve political goals, the glorification of ‘armed resistance’ and antisemitism in all its forms. Any material that goes against these principles risks undermining peace and coexistence and has no place in textbooks or classrooms. 

The paragraph in the EU  letter saying: “The EU has no tolerance for incitement to hatred and violence as means to achieve political goals, the glorification of ‘armed resistance’ and antisemitism in all its forms” was really encouraging.

 

Have seen a petition ​of Jewish groups ​against the government​ of Israel

Perhaps the signatories will ask the US to demand that the PA repeal its unprecedented law which provides an automatic salary for life for anyone who murders a Jew- not only an Israeli -or a salary for life the family of the killer, if the killer dies in the attack?

https://israelbehindthenews.com/2017/01/11/incentivizing-terrorism-palestinian-authority-allocations-terrorists-families/

Not one of the 135 nations which aid the PA have asked the PA to repeal this law.

​​

​Not one Jewish organization has asked the PA to repeal that law, except for CAEF, the Canadian Antisemitism Education Foundation​


Have just come back from Shiva calls to the seven Jews who were murdered outside the schule in Neve Yaakov on Shabbat.

Witnesses to the killings as they came out of schedule reported how the​ Arab​ killer calmly​ and methodically ​ shot each ​Jew at point blank range until the police came and killed the shooter

 

What witnesses to the killing saw was how the ​Arab  approached each victim after he shot them, and how he shot each one in the back of the neck to assure that a ​”​coups de grace​”​ had been administered to make sure that each Jew was dead.

​​

The father of the killer expressed pride in his son, and says that he awaits his gratuity for life from the PA.

Now ​working with journalists from the UNRWA camp in Shuafa to produce a new movie to reflect the life under UNRWA.

What we see is not that Arab children are being indoc​trinated  to hate Jews. Much worse. They are being ​brainwashed to kill Jews, with no emotion​​

Biden Admin Announces $50 Million in New UNRWA Funding

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Tuesday announced $50 million in new funding for a UN agency that is dedicated solely to the descendants of Palestinian refugees and which has been widely denounced for propagating antisemitism, eliciting rebuke from a top Senate Republican.

Click here to read full article 

Behind the scene with David Bedein – January 29, 2023

Behind the scene with David Bedein – January 29, 2023

Avslöjande kartor: Den palestinska visionen som lärs ut i UNRWA:s skolor

 

Den aktuella efterforskningen handlar om cirka 115 kartor som förekommer i den senaste upplagan av skolböcker utgivna av den palestinska myndigheten 2020 och som används i UNRWA:s skolor. Dess källmaterial omfattade 125 böcker av årskurs 1-10 i ämnena arabiska, engelska, samhällskunskap (inklusive geografi och historia), islamisk utbildning, matematik, vetenskap och teknik.

 

Studierna syftar till att kontrollera hur detta presenteras – Israel/Palestina –, med tanke på den pågående konflikten mellan de två nationer som säger sig vara dess ägare. Grund hypotesen för denna forskning var att de två partierna ser detta land i sin helhet som sitt hemland, vilket bör uttryckas i de kartor som finns i deras respektive skolböcker. För att underbygga denna hypotes undersöktes också två israeliska läroböcker i geografi. De var officiellt licensierade av det israeliska utbildningsministeriet och utfärdades av Israeli Centre of Educational Technology (CET), som anses vara en central utgivare av skolböcker i Israel.

De israeliska läroböckerna finns kartor som presenterar landet som en enhet utan inre gränser under namnet “Israel” när dessa kartor inte var av politisk karaktär. Följande exempel är en karta med titeln “Mark i Israel”, som även inkluderar territorierna Judéen, Samarien och Gaza (liksom Golanhöjderna som ställdes under israelisk juridisk jurisdiktion 1981).

Karta nr 1 (Israel – Man and Space, Intermediate and High School grades (CET, 2007) s. 187)

Ett parallellt fenomen finns också på de palestinska kartorna. Följande är en karta med titeln “Physical Map of Palestine”:

Karta nr 2 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 1 (2020) s. 17)

 

Andra kartor på Israel uttrycker det faktum att territorierna Judéen och Samarien inte har annekterats av Israel (förutom östra Jerusalem) och Gazaremsan har blivit ett territorium utan någon som helst israelisk närvaro där sedan 2005. Dessa är mestadels kartor som bär en administrativ karaktär eftersom de utesluter dessa områden från Israels territorium med hjälp av uttrycket “[en region utan] data”. Följande är en karta med titeln “Befolkningstäthet i Israel enligt underdistrikt”:

Karta nr 3 (Utforska ett land – geografi för årskurs 6 [i] statliga och statliga religiösa [skolor] (CET, 2015) s. 69

 

Bland de palestinska kartorna som används i UNRWA:s skolor finns det å andra sidan bara ett fåtal kartor som visar konturerna av dessa områden. I följande exempel säger kartan inte specifikt vad som finns bortom dem:

Karta nr 4 (National and Life Education, årskurs 2, del 1 (2019) s. 62)

En annan karta behandlar den israeliska Negev-regionen som en del av Palestina bortom konturerna av Judéen, Samaria och Gaza:

 

“1. De fysiska egenskaperna i Palestina varierar – slätter, berg, dalar och öknar. Ytan av Negevöknen uppskattas till ungefär hälften av Palestinas yta. Det är möjligt att presentera det med bråkdelen…”

Karta nr 5 (Matematik, årskurs 3, del 1 (2020) s. 82)

En tredje karta med titeln “Palestina efter kriget 1948” säger specifikt i sin legend vad som är området bortom dessa områden:

“[Orange] arabiska territorier [lila] territorier som tagits över av sionisterna efter kriget”

Karta nr 6 (Geography and Modern and Contemporary History of Palestine, årsk 10, del 2 (2020) s. 8)

 

Och tillbaka till de israeliska kartorna. Den nuvarande politiska verkligheten beskrivs där som den är, med den palestinska myndighetens territorier betecknade som område A, och ibland även dess B-territorier, visas tydligt. Det bör dock noteras att PA inte är ett suveränt politiskt organ – även om det har erkänts av FN som en icke-medlem observatörsstat. Enligt Osloöverenskommelserna, genom vilka PA bildades och som fortfarande är i kraft, är det ett självständigt administrativt organ under den israeliska försvarsstyrkans överhöghet, som i sin tur lyder under den israeliska regeringens jurisdiktion. Följande är två israeliska kartor. Den första visar områdena A (färgad mörkbrun), och den andra visar områdena A (mörkbrun) och B (ljusbrun):

Karta nr 7 (Israel – Människan och rymden, mellan- och gymnasiebetyg (CET, 2007) s. 9)

Karta nr 8 (Utforska ett land – geografi för årskurs 6 [i] statliga och statliga religiösa [skolor] (CET, 2015) s. 10)

I total kontrast till dessa israeliska kartor (liksom många andra i böcker som undersökts till denna forskning), finns det inte ens en karta i hela korpusen av kartor som används i UNRWA:s skolor idag som visar staten Israel. Även på tydligt politiska kartor visas hela landet endast under namnet “Palestina”. Således raderas Israel, en erkänd suverän stat som har varit medlem i FN-organisationen sedan 1949, från kartorna som används av UNRWA, ett officiellt FN-organ!

Den första kartan bland de i följande exempel, med titeln “Karta över Palestina och Levanten”, presenterar de fyra staterna i Levantregionen under namnen: Syrien, Libanon, Jordanien och Palestina:

Karta nr 9 (Geography and Modern and Contemporary History of Palestine, årskurs 10, del 1 (2020) s. 8)

Det andra exemplet är hämtat från en engelsk lärobok. Kartan, utan titel, visar regionens delstater med deras namn utan ytterligare detaljer. Även här ersätter Palestina Israel:

Karta nr 10 (engelska för Palestina, årskurs 6, del 1 (2019) s. 55)

 

En annan karta, med titeln “Map of Palestine”, ger namnen på grannstaterna:

Karta nr 11 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 6, del 1 (2020) s. 9)

 

Den uteslutande palestinska karaktären av landet som helhet betonas i följande exempel. En karta med titeln “Map of the Arab Homeland” visar arabstaterna med deras namn. Namnet “Palestina” visas bredvid landet i sin helhet (färgat i rött) med den palestinska flaggan ovanför:

Karta nr 12 (Nationell och social fostran, årskurs 4, del 1 (2020) s. 8)

 

Denna karta visas i läroboken inom ramen för lektion 2 med titeln: “Palestina är arabiskt och muslimskt”:

 

Det exklusiva palestinska ägandet av landet betonas i en övning där eleven uppmanas att färglägga landets karta med färgerna på den palestinska flaggan:

“Den andra lektionen: Jag ritar mitt land

Förberedande aktivitet: Mitt lands form

Jag kommer att färga mitt hemlands karta med färgerna på den palestinska flaggan.”

Karta nr 13 (National and Life Education, årskurs 2, del 1 (2019) s. 8)

Och ett annat exempel. Inskriptionen bredvid den säger: “Tillsammans ska vi skydda hemlandet”:

Karta nr 14 (islamisk utbildning, årskurs 2, del 1 (2020) s. 42)

Palestinas exklusiva utseende på landets karta syns också i en produkt som säljs till turister som visar landets karta färgad med den palestinska flaggans färger, tillsammans med namnet “Palestina” på arabiska och engelska. Följande är ett exempel som ges i en annan lärobok:

Karta nr 15 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 2 (2020) s. 57)

Om Israels territorium före 1967 är ett ockuperat område, som anges på karta nr 6, bör det befrias. Kampen för detta mål antyds i följande illustration som presenterar kartan över hela landet mot bakgrund av Al-Aqsa-moskén och ett beslöjat ansikte av vad som kan betraktas som en medlem av en terroristorganisation, under titeln “Palestina är nationens hjärta”:

Karta nr 16 (arabiska språket, årskurs 7, del 1 (2020) s. 13)

I detta sammanhang anses städer inom Israels territorium före 1967 där araber bor, eller brukade bo, vara palestinska städer – även om majoriteten av befolkningen där är judar:

“6. Jag kommer att ange följande palestinska städer på en tyst karta över Palestina:

Acre, Haifa, Gaza, Jeriko, Jerusalem, Nablus, Safed, Beer Sheba, Hebron, Rafah.” Det bör noteras att de fetstilta namnen är städer i Israel före 1967 (inklusive västra Jerusalem) och deras befolkning är till största delen judar.

Karta nr 17 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 2 (2020) s. 39)

Nästa exempel, med titeln “Palestinska städer”:

“Aktivitet 3: Vi kommer att titta på kartan nedan och kommer sedan att utföra följande [krav]:

Vi kommer att ge exempel på palestinska städer:

-På kusten

-I inlandets bergen

-Städer i Jordandalen

-Städer belägna i ökenregionen”

 

På kartan, med titeln “Map of Palestine” visas följande städer: Acre, Safed, Haifa, Tiberias, Nasaret, Jaffa, Beer Sheba – alla är israeliska städer före 1967, samt Nablus, Ramallah, Jerusalem (varav den västra del var israelisk före 1967), Betlehem, Hebron, Gaza och Rafah.

Karta nr 18 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 2 (2020) s. 36)

Förutom att ignorera existensen av Israel som en suverän stat, efter att ha presenterat hela sitt territorium som ockuperat – med den underförstådda föreställningen att det borde befrias, finns det totalt icke-erkännande i kartorna som används i UNRWA-skolan för judarna som bor i detta landet och som idag omfattar cirka sju miljoner människor. Detta icke-erkännande uttrycks av den totala frånvaron från kartan över städer som skapats av judar i modern tid, främst Tel Aviv. Budskapet är tydligt: ​​judar är främmande för Palestina och de har ingen legitim plats där. Följande är ett exempel av många:

Städerna som visas på kartan – Safed, Tiberias, Nasaret, Acre, Beisan (dagens Beit She’an), Umm al-Fahm (förklarar officiellt som en stad under israeliskt styre), Jenin, Tubas , Tulkarm, Nablus, Qalqilyah, Jaffa, Lydda, Ramleh, Ramallah, Jeriko, Jerusalem, Betlehem, Hebron, Gaza, Beer Sheba. De saknade städerna: Tel Aviv, Holon, Bat Yam, Ramat Gan, Beney Berak, Petah Tikvah, Herzliya, Netanya, Hadera, Afula, Övre Nasaret (nyligen omdöpt till Nof Hagalil), Kiryat Shmona, Kiryat Gat, Beit Shemesh, Dimona, Ofakim , Shderot, Netivot, Karmiel, The Krayot nära Haifa och många andra.

Karta nr 19 (National and Life Education, årskurs 2, del 2 (2019) s. 58)

 

Och ett annat exempel: städerna vars namn anges på kartan – Akko, Safed, Haifa, Nasaret, Nablus, Ramallah, Jaffa, Asqakan (dagens Ashkelon), Jeriko, Jerusalem, Betlehem, Hebron, Beer Sheba, Gaza, Rafah

Karta nr 20 (Samhällskunskap, årskurs 5, del 1 (2020) s. 55)

Se även kartorna nr 6, 11, 18 och det finns många fler.

 

Två undantag är städer etablerade av judar som förekommer på kartan under de arabiska namnen på de ödsliga platser där de senare byggdes: Eilat (Umm al-Rashrash) – flera gånger (se kartorna nr 11, 18 ovan) och Hadera (Al) -Khudaira) – en gång (Matematik, årskurs 4, del 1 (2020) s. 86).

Israeliska kartor däremot visar vanligtvis centrala städer som Nablus, Hebron och Gaza i områdena Judéen, Samaria och Gazaremsan (och se kartorna nr 1, 3, 7, 8 ovan).

Att dölja den judiska närvaron i landet i skolböcker som används av UNRWA kommer också till uttryck i det historiska sammanhanget. Följande är en text som åtföljer kartan över detta land och dess omgivningar i en engelsk lärobok. Texten, med titeln “Om Palestina”, avstår från att nämna landets judiska förflutna:

Karta nr 21 (engelska för Palestina, årskurs 10, del 2 (2017) s. 4)

Sammanfattningsvis ger en enkel jämförelse mellan kartorna i UNRWA:s skolböcker och deras israeliska motsvarigheter oss en slutsats:

De israeliska kartorna speglar den existerande verkligheten, medan de palestinska kartorna som används av UNRWA uttrycker den palestinska visionen där inte Israel existerar, hela landet är under palestinsk suveränitet, de sju miljoner judar som bor i Israel ”försvinner” – med sina städer och sin gamla historia där, och sättet att förverkliga denna vision är genom kamp. Den kampen nämns uttryckligen i texter som granskats i tidigare forskningsstudier och antyds även här (se karta nr 16 ovan).

 

Det finns inget sätt att rättfärdiga användningen av dessa kartor av ett FN-organ som har åtagit sig principerna att respektera suveräniteten för varje medlemsstat i FN-organisationen – inklusive staten Israel, total neutralitet gentemot parterna till konflikten och lösningen av den konflikten fredligt enligt FN:s resolutioner. UNRWA:s användning av dessa kartor visar på en grov bristande respekt för dessa tre principer och givarstaterna bör agera kraftfullt för att ändra denna dystra situation.

Citizens of Israel who live abroad plan protests against Israel during the weekend of February 4 in the cities listed below.

Citizens of Israel who live abroad plan protests against Israel during the weekend of February 4 in the cities listed below.

GIVE THEM  FEEDBACK

Glaring inconsistencies

Another week witnesses yet more mind-boggling contortions by so-called friends and declared foes alike.

Michael Kuttner

Surely by now, we should not be shocked or startled by the outbursts of duplicitous double standards and hyperventilated hysterical fear-mongering issuing forth from all and sundry. Unfortunately, experience should have taught us that there is no limit when it comes to anything to do with Israel and Jews.

Is there really any point in continuing to shine a spotlight on these manifestations of irrationality? Perhaps one should just ignore them in the hope that common sense will prevail.

Our history regrettably demonstrates that doing so is a lethal mistake.

As the forthcoming commemoration of International Holocaust Day proves, remembering murdered Jews has become, for many nations, an annual occasion to spout politically correct rhetoric while glossing over a complete failure to save Jews or prevent their demise. How many politicians have apologised for their past Governments’ failures to rescue the victims pre-war? Who will condemn the prejudices which caused borders to be shut? Who will call out the callous UK mandatory policy of barring Jewish refugees from entering Palestine because the Arabs of the time demanded it?

It’s all very well to wax eloquently about the Shoah and its devastating effects, but when the sins of the past are by direct and indirect inference transmitted onto the nation State of the Jews today, then red lines are crossed. In the warped minds of those who view Israel as the embodiment of evil and a pariah among the nations, the glaring inconsistencies couldn’t be clearer.

Crocodile tears shed at the 27 January ceremonies are so much more hypocritical when rampant Judeophobia in the Arab and Islamic world as well as UN-sanctioned incitement, are ignored.

Supporting or abstaining on UN resolutions detaching Jews from their ancient homeland and holy sites makes a mockery of Shoah commemorative gatherings.

It gets worse than that.

Today there is a move to dilute the Shoah’s core meaning by minimising the fact that the main aim of the Germans and their willing helpers was to eradicate every single Jewish man, woman and child. True, others were also targeted for elimination, but it was only the Jews who were to be systematically isolated and slaughtered. A Welsh politician has issued invitations to a Holocaust Day vigil that omits any reference to Jews.

With Jew/Israel hate once again becoming endemic, the conundrum is, what can be done to combat it? Education of a woefully ignorant generation today would seem to be a worthy objective. Some countries commendably, including the United Arab Emirates, have instituted Holocaust studies as compulsory features of their history curricula. It is shameful that still, far too many so-called enlightened democracies have yet to do so. Bear this in mind when you hear your politicians spouting forth.

Trying to educate those already infected by the virus, worthy as it is, and reaching others about to be influenced by millennia-incubated hate will merely be a drop in the ocean. In a recent survey in the Netherlands, nearly a quarter of young adults responded that the Shoah is a myth. If this is the level of knowledge in a country that was under German occupation, just imagine the ignorance level among the same age group in nations unaffected.

Contributing to the upsurge in hate is the incitement pouring out of the mouths of those who deny Jews the right to pray and freely visit the holiest site of Judaism. This stream of invective and lies is given official sanction by the cowardly utterances of diplomats and officials from various nations. The UK Minister for the Middle East, Lord Ahmed, stated on a recent visit that “the Temple Mount should remain under Jordanian control.”  Similar sentiments from others completely ignore the shameful past and present records of the Jordanians when it comes to religious freedom for Jews. That is par for the course in the twisted reality of today’s international diplomacy.

What are we to make of these inconsistencies?

The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards have been exposed multiple times as the enforcers of internal repression and external facilitators of terror. The European Parliament declared them by an overwhelming majority to be a terrorist group and, therefore, worthy candidates for international sanctions. This move has been denounced by the Iranian regime, which in turn threatens to classify European armies as terror organisations.

In response to this blatant chutzpah, the European Union Foreign Policy Chief, in full-blown appeasement mode, declined to follow through on the EU’s Parliamentary vote. Citing mumbo jumbo legal objections once again, the response to Iranian bully threats harks back to the good old appeasement days of the 1930s.

However, surprise, surprise, when it comes to condemning Israel, there is no hesitation. All it takes is for the Israeli Government to punish the terror tactics of the PA, and the wrath of Europe descends in an instant.

Palestine Media Watch reported that the PA President for life, Abbas, in a telephone call to terrorist murders of Israelis said: “you are a role model of the nation and this people and you are symbols of the Palestinian people.”

What has been the EU reaction?

The PA Prime Minister has been invited to be the guest of the EU. No doubt the red carpet will be dusted off and rolled out, and after the usual litany of PA lies is reeled off, the EU will stress that there is no better peace partner. Meanwhile, the rest of the UN democracies are mute or else they are convulsing over Israel’s new coalition.

The hysterical reaction to Israel’s new democratically elected coalition continues unabated. Although few policies have yet been enacted, the doomsday reactions pour forth. When so-called elites of the left prophesy that “darkness has descended” and that “the sky is falling” the media hyperventilate. It does not take much for international groups to join in, and that is why we can witness a festival of fevered agitation. Measured opposition and cogent, calm discourse is a natural part of democratic societies. What we are witnessing these days is an irrational campaign of vilification.

Indicative of the insanity which has now infected all and sundry is the statement of a US Jewish Congressman. In what one can only describe as gross interference in the choice of the Israeli electorate, he proclaimed, “the makeup of the Israeli Government is corrosive to support in the Democratic caucus.” In other words, unless Israelis elect a coalition which is acceptable to the Democratic Party, it will lose the support of the USA.

Faced with these glaring inconsistencies, I can only quote the reported words of Michael Medved, a US author and political commentator. He speaks about Americans but his remarks can also be applied to others suffering from the same symptoms.

“A quick glance at the American left reveals a movement in the midst of a nervous breakdown, displaying behaviour that goes beyond inconsistency into the realm of bipolar moods and multiple personality disorder.”

 Looking at the collective insanity happening all around us, it would seem that psychologists have a major pandemic to deal with.   

Michael Kuttner is a Jewish New Zealander who for many years was actively involved with various communal organisations connected to Judaism and Israel. He now lives in Israel and is J-Wire’s correspondent in the region.

Holding the EU up to its own standards

As the head of the Nahum Bedein Center for Near East Policy Research, I have covered the Palestinian Authority school system since the very first day that the PA began to issue its own textbooks on August 1, 2000. 


Having met with and received authorization of Yassir Arafat to receive and review all textbooks  issued by the Palestinian Authority and used by UNRWA schools in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and Gaza, the center engaged Dr. Arnon Groiss to review more than 1,000 school books issued by the PA. 

Dr. Groiss, fluent in Arabic, holds  a Phd in Islamic Studies from Princeton University, and a masters degree in public administration at Harvard, and served as the deputy director of Arab language services at the Israel Broadcasting Authority.

Holding the EU up to its own standards