The Story Behind The Passion for Israel Court Reform

In June 1992, with the defeat of the Likud government and the ascension of the Labor Party, the Palestine Liberation Organization, an outlawed terrorist organization in a full state of total war against Israel raised its profile and initiated illegal contacts with the Israel Labor Party.

I worked at the time as the Jerusalem Correspondent for CNN Radio, with access to high-level contacts with the Israel and US government. Therefore, I was in a position to confirm that the Bush Administration, and subsequently the new Clinton Administration, laid out policy directives mandating that Israel must follow up on these PLO contacts, described by the US government as a PLO peace initiative.

In August 1993, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres was summoned to Washington to coordinate a shift in Israeli policy, which now officially recognized the PLO as a partner for peace, despite continuing PLO terror attacks. That policy engendered the Oslo process and an accord which was signed on the White House lawn September 13, 1993, yet never ratified by the PLO.

Sources in the Israeli security establishment and the Likud opposition in the Knesset raised objections to the new US pressure on Israel to recognize the PLO as a peace partner. However, it was exactly at this time that Aharon Barak became chief justice of the Supreme Court of Israel.

In 1992, Justice Barak established a precedent to throw out all legal objections to what would become the Oslo peace process.

The Barak court did not object to the September 13 accords, despite the fact that these accords were never ratified by the PLO, and despite the fact that the PLO never renounced its public incitement to violence nor cancelled its charter to destroy Israel.

The Barak court did not object to the September 15 policy statement by the Israeli government that the IDF would supply guns to the armed forces of the PLO. Those Israeli-armed PLO forces are now in an open war against Israel.

The Barak court did not object to the decision of the Israel government to free hordes of convicted PLO felons who had been convicted of murder or attempted murder. Over the past 30 years, families of victims murdered by these felons had appealed to the high court to file motions against freeing them, citing the government’s failure to apply any system of recidivism verification, to determine whether these felons were likely to repeat their capital crimes. All this was to no avail.

A retired commander of Israel’s Security Services in Jerusalem has confirmed that Israel has freed at least 9,000 first-degree felons without any regard to the possibility of them repeating their crimes.

Get thej.ca a Pro Israel Voice by Email. Never miss a top story that effects you, your family & your community

REMOVING CIVIL LIBERTIES, PROPERTY RIGHTS FROM JEWS OF ANY AREA ACQUIRED BY ISRAEL IN THE 1967 WAR 

A central feature of US Middle East Policy in 1992 which was adopted by the Israeli government and echoed by Israel’s courts concerned a policy of delegitimizing civil liberties and property rights of Jews who live in Judea, Samaria, Gush Katif and even Jerusalem.

​For thirty years, the Israeli High Court has tossed out successive cases where Jews in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem sued for their civil liberties and property rights.

The most egregious decisions of the Barak court concerned the plight of Jews expelled from their homesin Gush Katif and Samaria in 2005. The harsh reality was that the Israeli government was not prepared to provide for 1,700 families evicted from their homes in the twenty-one Jewish communities of Gush Katif. On the eve of the Katif expulsions, at an August 23, 2005 press conference, Attorney Yitzhak Meron provided sobering evidence of the failures of the Sharon government in this regard.

Dr. Meron was a senior member of the Israel Legal Forum, an organization of 50 Israeli lawyers that worked pro bono during the period leading up to the expulsion in an effort to ameliorate the difficulties of the Gush Katif residents, presenting their case to the Knesset and the courts.

The government approach to the settlers, according to Dr. Meron, was “aggressive” from the very beginning, with a lack of direct communication.

The prime minister never went to “look in their eyes,” and ministers in the government who voted for expulsion did so without having visited the communities whose fates they were deciding. When the Defense Minister finally traveled to Katif to meet with residents there on April 19, 2005, he refused to answer questions. I witnessed that refusal.

Three days before the expulsion was to begin, the government announced that 1,000 rooms had been rented and everyone would have somewhere to stay. The reality was that 2,500 rooms were required due to large families. Officials had to scour Israel, seeking rooms at the last moment. The Forum assisted in this emergency action. People left their homes literally not knowing where they were going to go. No social workers were sent by the government to help people cope logistically, or psychologists to help with trauma.

Because the government ordered thousands of people removed from their homes, it was obligated to provide satisfactory alternative housing. However, that took ten to fifteen years, without any objection from the courts.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Aharon Barak rejected the final appeal before the Katif expulsions, giving an order for bulldozers to begin demolition. (Photo: Marc Israel Sellem/POOL via JNS).

I was present when Supreme Court Chief Justice Aharon Barak rejected the final appeal before the Katif expulsions. Dr. Meron, speaking upon behalf of the Katif community, appealed to Justice Barak to consider the justice of their case.

These “settlers” were resigned to the expulsion and only asked at the end for a relocation process to be implemented.

Barak turned to the government attorney and asked whether the government had a plan to resettle the twenty-one Katif communities. When the attorney responded vaguely that the government would take care of everything, Justice Barak smiled, thanked him, and gave an order for bulldozers to begin demolition.

When the US announced its policy to demand the removal of Jews from Judea, Samaria and the Old City of Jerusalem, a delegation of US citizens who live in these communities approached the US Consul in Jerusalem, Mr. Philip Wilcox, about the human rights of Jews in these communities. Wilcox responded with a single sentence that echoed around the world: “If you live there, you have no human rights”.

There was silence in the room. Wilcox then asked participants if they would like coffee or tea.

The legacy of Philip Wilcox lives on in the Foundation for Middle East Peace, which finances 40 organizations that support the PLO and advocate for the continuing expulsions of Jews from their homes.

Thus, the Israeli High Court of Justice paved the way for the Palestine Liberation Organization to gain land and power in the heartland of Israel.

Yet the PLO openly refuses to endorse a two-state solution. In the words of retired Member of Knesset Benny Begin, “The PLO wants a two-stage solution, not a two-state solution.”

Thanks to the Israeli High Court of Justice, the PLO is getting away with it.

Israel braces for more violence after mass-casualty West Bank raid

Israel is bracing for another escalation of violence after at least nine Palestinians were killed in a counterterrorism raid on the West Bank city of Jenin, a defense establishment source told Ynet on Thursday.
כניסת כוחות צה"ל לג'נין“This stays in Jenin for the time being,” the source said, adding that Israeli forces will be placed on high alert across the West Bank. 

“This is a number of casualties that you don’t see every day, we’re preparing for various escalation scenarios.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said in response to a Ynet request for comment that the premier is “receiving regular updates on the unfolding security events and will carry out a security situation assessment soon.”
Meanwhile, Hamas and Islamic Jihad announced that they would hold an emergency meeting in the Gaza Strip following the fighting in Jenin.

According to Al Jazeera, Islamic Jihad informed international mediators that “if the aggression against Jenin does not stop, the situation is expected to escalate and all options are on the table.”
In the meantime, no outstanding instructions have been relayed to authorities or security personnel in southern Israeli communities near Gaza.

כניסת כוחות צה"ל לג'נין
According to the IDF, the operation was launched to “apprehend a terror squad belonging to the Islamic Jihad terror organization”, acting on intelligence provided by the Shin Bet security agency. The army said it “thwarted a major attack.”

Eight of the Palestinian casualties were reportedly armed militants, most of whom were Islamic Jihad operatives. The Palestinians reported that an elderly woman was also killed in the fierce shootout between Palestinian terrorists and Israeli troops.
The IDF said it “was aware of reports of a Palestinian civilian being hit” and that “the circumstances of the event are under review.”
At least 20 others were wounded in the fighting, at least four of them sustaining serious injuries.
During the raid on a home in Jenin where the terrorists were hiding, Israeli troops employed a so-called “pressure cooker” tactic on the building and fired a missile at it.
מפגינים בעזה נגד האירועים בג'נין
Protests in Gaza against Israeli counterterrorism operation in Jenin

Such an extensive operation in broad daylight is unusual and suggests the attack was due shortly.
The raid began with IDF soldiers entering Jenin to arrest three wanted Islamic Jihad operatives, who had already carried out shooting attacks against Israeli forces.

During the arrest attempt, the terrorists opened fire on the fighters, who recognized them as armed, returned fire and killed them. Two of them tried to escape and were shot and another surrendered himself to the security forces.
IDF combat engineering soldiers entered the building in order to detonate two explosive devices used by the suspects, where there was an additional armed suspect who was killed by the soldiers at the scene.
Following the events, general strikes were announced in Jenin, Nablus and Ramallah and classes were suspended in some places.

אבו מאזן
A spokesperson for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said, “Israel is committing a massacre in the Jenin camp while the world remains silent.”
The Palestinian foreign ministry appealed to the United States and the international community: “If you don’t act now in the face of the brutal carnage in the Jenin camp, when will you?”

Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh also called on the international community to get involved.

“We call on the United Nations and all international human rights organizations to urgently intervene to provide protection to our people and stop the bloodshed that children, young people and women are experiencing,” he said.

Two of the men were identified by the Palestinian health ministry as Essam Mahmoud Azriqi (24), and Salahat ‘Iz a-Din, who is considered one of the most prominent militants in Jenin.

Piece sited by Andrew Tucker in Israel on Trial

The purpose of this report is to present a clear solid historical and legal
basis for Israeli sovereignty over the entire area of the Mandate. An objective
evaluation of the relevant binding instruments and applicable rules of
international law conclusively establishes the legality of Israeli sovereignty over
Judea and Samaria,1 and the right of Jewish settlement therein. These basic legal
historical documents speak the truth to all who choose to read them.

The British Mandate-Defining-Jewish-Sovereignty-under-International-Law2-thinc-website (1)

‘Pro-Palestinian’ Means No Such Thing

“There are three kinds of lies,” Mark Twain said, attributing the insight to Benjamin Disraeli, “lies, damned lies and statistics.” Turns out there is a fourth: “pro-Palestinian.”

Virtually everything described as pro-Palestinian is not. That is, it does not pertain to improving Palestinian Arabs’ lives in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza Strip, let alone in United Nations-maintained Palestinian internment centers—euphemistically labeled refugee camps—in those territories and Jordan, Lebanon and Syria.

Click here to read full article 

The PA poses a strategic threat to Israel’s security

Recent steps taken by the new Israeli government in retaliation for the Palestinian Authority’s appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) represent the first indication that a much-needed change is underway.

Traditionally, Israeli governments avoided confronting the PA over its breaches of the Oslo Accords, such as supporting terrorism, ongoing incitement, and unilateral activities in international fora.

Click here to read full article 

Frantic Frenzy

The Oxford dictionary definition of frenzy states “a period of uncontrolled excitement or wild behaviour.”

Michael Kuttner

Here in Israel, we seem to be experiencing an endless period of such manifestations. It is not only on the local scene but also erupting internationally.

The basic cause can be traced back to the results of the 1 November 2022 general elections, which resulted in a fairly decisive defeat for the self-proclaimed champions of democratic values and liberalism.

Interestingly, although the defeated coalition consisted of at least one post-Zionist party espousing extreme left-wing views, nobody, either in the media or international forums, used the words ultra-left or extremist. Likewise, the Arab party in the coalition was never called out by commentators or the media for more or less managing to hide its ambivalent attitude towards Islamic terror. The so-called centre parties did a wonderful balancing act of trying to appease those spreading lies and fables about Israel and kowtowing to the United Nations’ endless condemnations. Rhetoric was never in short supply, but when it came to actually making the offenders pay for their actions, there was a distinct lack of a sustained counterattack.

It is vital to remember this because if one is to believe the overblown headlines and frenzied comments of all and sundry since the election results were announced, one would think that a coup d’état has taken place. That is precisely the expression being bandied about by those about to see many of their sacred cows sacrificed.

Obviously, in the distorted thinking of those who proclaim themselves “enlightened, liberal and democratic,” all voters and parties to the right of centre must, by their definition, be fascistic, ultra and extremist.

In addition, anyone who refuses to subscribe to the latest woke political thought beliefs must be a bigot and beyond redemption. Add to the mix an increasing number of voters who believe that we are here because of our religious and historical heritage, and you have the perfect answer as to why the current frenzy has become a veritable apocalyptic storm.

When the leaders of the righteous left give vent to their frustrations by whipping up the masses with bombastic outbursts, it is only natural that their followers will likewise erupt with full fury. In a democracy, opposition voices can and indeed must be heard, but when they descend to rabble-rousing, red lines are crossed. Threats of civil warfare and other inflammatory threats are apparently acceptable if they emanate from the “enlightened left” but are threats to democratic values if they are uttered by the “ultras” of the right.

When a former Prime Minister and millionaire leader of the socialist workers’ Labour party can spout drivel such as “this Government is legal but clearly illegitimate” and “street battles must oust the Prime Minister”, you know that irrational lunacy has supplanted common sense. The deafening silence of much of the media and the “liberal defenders of democracy” in the face of this incitement highlight the glaring double standards now prevailing.

At demonstrations, the black flags of anarchy and the terror flags of the Palestinian Authority can be seen, which just about sums up where many of these protesters are coming from.

JNS reported that the New Israel Fund had admitted financing anti-Government protests in Israel, which should not come as any surprise given their past funding of various extreme leftist groups. No doubt, various other European NGOs are also involved in helping to stir the pot against Israel’s democratic Government.

It is no wonder, therefore, that given all this domestic frenzy, international organisations and nations genetically opposed to Israel’s continued presence in the region have jumped on the bandwagon.

After all, if post-Zionist media outlets in Zion that print and post daily diatribes against the country’s Jewish ethos and excuse each and every outrage perpetrated by terror facilitators can blacken the country, then why can’t the UN and others do the same? I am not sure in these days of woke correctness whether one can still use the expression “blacken”, but no doubt you get the drift.

It was reported by the Times of Israel that the Principal of Israel’s most prestigious secular high school had some time ago stopped pupils from going on State-sponsored visits to Auschwitz. His reason for doing so was because “these trips contribute to the process of fascisization taking over politics in Israel.” To put it simply, his opposition is really a result of pupils returning from Poland with a heightened sense of Israeli and Jewish national consciousness and identity. Seeing first-hand what Germans and their willing partners did to defenceless Jews in the Diaspora has the effect of strengthening Israeli youth in their determination to not allow the same fate to befall their families. This, in turn, can result in some questioning the policy of submission to those who incite and carry out terror acts in Israel.

In the eyes of those who promote extreme leftist policies of appeasement and belittle the religious and historical connection of Jews to this Land the strengthening of any national pride is fascist. Past Israeli Ministers of far-left parties espoused the same sort of opposition to these visits to Auschwitz.

Coincidentally in the international media, taking their lead no doubt from our own flagellating groups, various commentators and so-called experts warn about the rising tide of “aggressive nationalism”, which is posing a peril. In today’s politically correct climate, this means that Zionism which is the movement of Jewish nationalism is by direct inference a threat to world peace. Israelis who demonstrate their patriotism either by voting for nationalist parties or merely by expressing their belief in the necessity for a strong State are therefore condemned. This explains why Israel as the resurrected national nation of the Jewish People, is the target of universal disdain.

At the end of December, the UN General Assembly voted at the behest of the PA to refer Israel to the International Court of Justice at The Hague. Safe in the knowledge that any condemnation of Israel can garner an automatic majority, this latest diplomatic terror tactic is a safe bet as far as Abbas is concerned.

When the previous coalition was in power, the worst that could be expected would have been worthless expressions of outrage followed by Abbas visiting Defence Minister Gantz at his home, where following a cup of tea, all would be back to normal again. After all, as stated by leading members of the past Government, Abbas is our only hope as a peace partner.

This time, however, much to the consternation of the PA and its fellow travellers, the newly installed right-wing coalition reacted in a totally different manner.

Instead of a verbal slap on the wrist and then business as usual, the consequences are far more serious.

Instead of transferring tax money to the PA so that they can continue to pay terrorists for slaying Israelis, the relevant amount has been withheld and redirected to victims of Palestinian terror. Finally, and long overdue, there is a financial penalty for the PA’s ongoing campaign of physical and diplomatic terror.

The next step has been the cancellation of VIP passes for PA officials, which enable them to enter Israel automatically without having to stand in line like everyone else.

Also belatedly, but better late than never, is the clamp down on illegal building in Area C of Judea and Samaria. Financed and facilitated by the EU, this illegal construction has been ignored for far too long.

As anticipated, these measures have unleashed a frenzy of agitated horror from all and sundry. The prospect of an Israeli Government actually taking steps to defend its sovereignty and punishing those waging war against it is anathema. That is why from so-called friends and well-known foes alike, the condemnations have been pouring forth. Apparently, over 90 countries have supported a demand by the PA to force Israel to rescind these sanctions.

Commendably Australia is not among these appeasers. Unsurprisingly, New Zealand, after having abstained on the original UN resolution to refer Israel to the ICJ, has added its name to those countries demanding Israel immediately cancel its penalties. No doubt having been criticised for abstaining in the first place, the NZ Foreign Ministry felt it had to condemn Israel, and thus it jumped on the bandwagon.

An example of how deranged some frustrated leftists have become is the case of a Tel Aviv owner of a restaurant that has kosher certification. In protest at her favourite left-wing party having lost the election, she has now decided to cancel the kosher status of her establishment and presumably now serve up “glat treif” instead.

In the face of this domestic and international insanity, it is time to stand strong and act accordingly.

Behind the scene with David Bedein – January 19, 2023

Behind the scene with David Bedein – January 19, 2023

Benjamin Netanyahu in a special conversation with Peter Robinson

Benjamin Netanyahu in a special conversation with Peter Robinson

Israel’s hard-line government facing multifront Palestinian war, analysts warn

Israel could be facing a multifront conflict with united armed groups in the West Bank and Gaza Strip should its new hard-line government continue on the path of “provocation,” Palestinian analysts are warning.

Click here to read full article. 

Smotrich Enables Lease for Life to “PAY FOR SLAY”.

This week, a news story rocked the media: The new Israel Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich cut Israel funds to the PA , commensurate with the amount of funds that the PLO grants to those who have murdered Jews and to the families of their killers

These grants are processed accordance with the PA “pay for slay” law. While it is known that the PLO pays killers, few people know that this is according to a statute of the PLO.

Smotrich stipulated that all PLO funds allocated to killers must now be allocated to the families of their victims, leaving the world with the impression that a new policy of the Israel Minister of Finance had put the “coups de grace” on the unprecedented law of the PLO which is that if you kill a Jew, you get a salary for life, and that if you die in the process of murdering a Jew, your family receives a salary for life.

However, this is hardly the end of “Pay to Slay”

Smotrich has not yet respond to key questions.

The more people who ask these questions of the government of Israel, the better.

*Why does the government of Israel not demand that the PLO repeal its “Pay for Slay” law?

*Why does the government of Israel not demand that 135 nations who finance the PLO now demand that aid to the Palestine Authority be conditional on repeal of the “Pay for Slay”?

*Will the government of Israel not issue an order to the Bank of Israel to stop processing funds for those who murder Jews?

*What punitive measures will the government of Israel take against those who forward bank funds as an gratuity for those who murder Jews?

Conclusion: Unless Israel amends his actions, Finance Minister Smotrich has granted PAY FOR SLAY a new release for life.