How unsurprising

“Life is full of surprises. Not all these surprises are pleasant, so you need to be ready for what life brings you.”

This anonymous quote encapsulates the situation prevailing today where many are still caught unaware by developments that with a little foresight, could have been anticipated.

Even when past events clearly pointed to disastrous and calamitous outcomes, an unerring ability to tread down the same path years later seems to prevail. For some inexplicable reason, Jewish people seem to be afflicted with this defective genetic attribute more than other groups.

Our history, ancient and modern, is full of examples of this phenomenon.

Just read the “tzoris” that Moshe had to put up with during the forty-year odyssey in the wilderness. After entry to the Promised Land, the same backstabbing and relapses reoccurred with monotonous and disastrous results.

Today, in addition to the eternal efforts of our enemies to target Israel and Jews in general, we continue to face undermining on the part of self-loathers who have this uncanny ability to join hands with external haters.

It is amazing how many times our decision-makers and non-elected Diaspora machers are surprised whenever the recycled slanders and machinations surface. One would think that by now they might have learnt the lessons of the past.

The latest crop of “surprises” should have been anticipated because, as King Solomon said a long time ago “there is nothing new under the sun.”

Hard on the heels of the Nakba Day fiasco at the United Nations General Assembly, where President for Life, Abbas, spewed a litany of lies and received a standing ovation for his efforts, the PA and others commemorated Naksa Day. You can be forgiven if you do not know what this particular piece of revisionist history is all about because so far it has received far less media exposure.

The first week in June is the anniversary of the 1967 Six-Day War when miraculously, Israel managed to avert a planned genocidal massacre of Jewish Israelis. Anyone born before 1967 can still remember the events leading up to that fatal period. Nasser of Egypt, together with the leaders of Syria, Jordan and Iraq, were poised to attack Israel and hurl any remaining Jews into the sea. Their intentions were no secret and the mob hysteria among the masses is recorded for posterity. Israel stood alone in the face of this impending doom. Abandoned by the USA, which reneged on its promised support and by the UN and international community, which issued pious pontifications but preferred to look the other way, the days preceding the outbreak of war were filled with dread. Teenagers helped to dig mass graves in parks in anticipation of horrendous casualties.

Unfortunately, these moments leading up to the Six-Day War tend to be forgotten by those born since 1967. The revisionists have had a field day, completely erasing the genocidal threats and focusing instead on what followed. The complete and utter defeat of the Arab forces arraigned against Israel resulted in the liberation of Judea, Samaria, the Golan and Jerusalem. Following the failure to annihilate the Jews, the myth of a fake Arab Palestine with Jerusalem as its make-believe capital was born. Anointed as the “patron saint” of religious freedom, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan successfully whitewashed its own shameful ethnic cleansing of Jews from the Old City.

This is how Naksa Day was created. Like the commemoration of the catastrophic creation of Israel in 1948, it mourns the defeat of the plan to destroy Israel in 1967. Needless to say, the same individuals and groups, with the help of the usual media who have elevated Nakba Day to sacred status, join together on Naksa Day observing yet another lost opportunity to wipe out the Jewish State.

All that is missing is the “hechsher” of the UN. No doubt and unsurprisingly to all but those mesmerised by the progressive left, this will follow in short order.

The UN, of course, never fails to prove how toxic and irrelevant it has become.

North Korea has been elected to the World Health Organization executive board. This pariah nation which breaks every record by its human rights abuses and bullying tactics against democratic neighbours and successfully thumbs its nose at the world community is elected to the WHO. One couldn’t make this up.

If you think that this piece of Orwellian doublespeak is some sort of aberration, you haven’t seen anything yet.

Iran, which clearly articulates its ambition to rid the world of the “Zionist colonialist apartheid entity”, has been rewarded by being appointed as a Vice President of the UN General Assembly. Concurrently this same regime has also been appointed rapporteur of the Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Committee of the UN General Assembly.

Here is a regime that thumbs its nose at the international community, develops nuclear missiles, exports terror and persecutes women, gays and Baha’is. Iran is now being rewarded by an organisation too corrupt and morally bereft to stand up for its long abandoned principles.

The fact that the few remaining democracies at the UN do not collectively refuse to go along with this farce should surprise nobody.

Like their predecessors in 1939 and 1967 they prefer to kick the can down the road and believe that appeasing the bullies with diplomatic goodies will avert the evil decree. Most Israelis know from bitter experience that this agenda leads to ultimate chaos and disaster.

When, sooner rather than later, the inevitable mess hits the fan the only ones who will be surprised are those who live in a parallel universe of make-believe fantasy.

Meanwhile, back in the good old USA, where mass shootings are an almost daily occurrence, the Secretary of State and Vice President had nothing better to do than once again lecture Israel.

Antony Blinken in an address to AIPAC, uttered these “memorable” words of admonition: “settlement expansion clearly presents an obstacle to the horizon of hope we seek.”

Presumably, it is only the sight of Jews returning to their historical heartland which creates obstacles. One needs to ask what sort of horizon of hope is being sought. In the absence of any condemnation of PA incitement, sponsorship of terror and payments for the murder of Israelis one has to assume that, as usual, it is only the Jews who are the villains impeding the dawn of the age of brotherly and sisterly love.

With Abbas being given a pass to continue spouting revisionist garbage without any adverse consequences, the Biden Administration unsurprisingly continues to promote a totally warped and futile policy.

Kamala Harris, not to be outdone, burbled total nonsense about judicial reform. As Israel’s Foreign Minister aptly responded, “She has obviously not read a word of the proposed reforms.” Of course, she hasn’t, but why should she when prattling inanities written by an uninformed speech writer is par for the course?

Don’t be surprised when in the very near future, the Americans will triumphantly announce a breathtaking agreement with Iran. It may not take place in Munich, but the end results will be similar.

Now is the time for all the ostriches at the UN to take their collective heads out of the sand. Unfortunately, based on past performances, it will all be too late.

Hopefully, Israel will be the least surprised and act accordingly.

Biden’s Ambassador to Israel Approved Grant Aimed at Delegitimizing Israel, Emails Show

The Biden administration’s outgoing ambassador to Israel personally signed off on a controversial $1 million grant to a program critics said was meant to delegitimize Israel, according to internal State Department communications obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

U.S. ambassador to Israel Thomas Nides approved the funding project in a January 2022 internal “action memo,” according to a trove of internal emails obtained by the America First Legal Foundation through a Freedom of Information Act request for information about the grant. The emails detail how Nides personally cleared the State Department to offer $987,654 for groups to investigate alleged human rights abuses in Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.

Those applying for the grant were instructed to probe the Israeli government for “documentation of legal or security sector violations and housing, land, and property rights.” The cash would essentially empower activist groups critical of Israel to pursue false claims that the Jewish state is systematically abusing Palestinians and stealing their land. With taxpayer cash at their disposal, these nonprofit groups could advance an agenda that pro-Israel advocates say fuels the delegitimization of Israel on the international stage by incentivizing a disproportionate focus on the supposed missteps and abuses of the Jewish State.

The taxpayer-funded initiative, which the Free Beacon first reported in March 2022, prompted a congressional investigation. Lawmakers accused the Biden administration of working to isolate Israel and bolster the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS), which wages economic warfare on the Jewish state. The United States government, critics said, should not be funding efforts to paint Israel as a pariah state.

The ambassador’s involvement in the funding effort is certain to attract congressional scrutiny as Israel’s defenders on Capitol Hill worry the Biden administration is alienating the Jewish State. President Joe Biden has been openly critical of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the State Department was found to be bankrolling far-left groups seeking to topple the prime minister’s governing coalition.

The emails show State Department officials working to get the grant approved so they could post it publicly on the department’s website. Subsequent emails show State Department employees discussing potential grant proposals submitted by various organizations looking to cash in. America First Legal, which began investigating the grant last year, says the emails indicate Nides, who is expected to vacate his post this summer, signed off before the grant was published.

“Best news to wake up to on a Monday!” one State Department employee wrote upon getting confirmation that the grant had been approved.

A State Department spokesman would not comment on Nides’s involvement in the program, saying, “as a general matter, we do not discuss internal government communications.”

While the State Department initially indicated to the Free Beacon that the grant had been canceled, it later clarified that statement to say that “no grant was awarded for this funding opportunity.” The spokesman, however, would not clarify what exactly that means, or provide the Free Beacon with updated information about the funding proposal.

“As the review of proposals is part of internal deliberations processes within the Department of State, we are unable to publicly share details regarding status or outcomes,” the spokesman said.

The ongoing opacity surrounding the program threatens to reignite a congressional battle with the State Department, which has been under pressure for more than a year to pull the taxpayer funding. Congressional sources who have been tracking the issue said it is unacceptable for the State Department to withhold information about a publicly available grant program.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and 11 other Republican lawmakers pressured the State Department last year to cancel the program, saying that it would embolden the global BDS movement.

“As a policy matter, it is wholly unacceptable for the State Department to fund NGOs to delegitimize and isolate Israel,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter, following the Free Beacon’s initial report on the grant. The State Department, the lawmakers said, is using taxpayer dollars to promote a “new anti-Semitism” that is “driven by a global network of anti-Israel nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and human rights groups.”

Cruz, in separate comments to the Free Beacon last year, accused the Biden administration of using “American taxpayer money to subsidize the international NGO campaign to demonize and isolate Israel.”

The America First Legal Foundation, which discovered Nides’s involvement in the grant program through a FOIA request, also launched an investigation into the matter last year, the Free Beacon reported.

Lawmakers and pro-Israel advocacy groups view the funding as part of a larger effort to mainstream the BDS movement and undermine Netanyahu’s government at a time when Israel is facing a renewed wave of terrorism. The State Department in particular has come under scrutiny for hiring several people who worked in the anti-Israel community and promoted the BDS movement.

The State Department, in its comment to the Free Beacon, maintained that these “programs are intended to foster respect for human rights and the rule of law and support democracy globally.” The State Department “carefully reviews all eligible proposals per our well-established and rigorous review process.”

Silence is not an option

Not one government in the world – including Israel – is ready to demand that the PA must repeal its law that if you murder a Jew you get a salary for life.

Not one Member of the Knesset is ready to support the demand that the PA must repeal its law that if you murder a Jew you get a salary for life.

This is the time to speak up that the PA must repeal its law that if you murder a Jew you get a salary for life. 

Here is that law: 

https://israelbehindthenews.com/2017/01/11/incentivizing-terrorism-palestinian-authority-allocations-terrorists-families/

The message has to be made clear to the PA, which works under the aegis of the Palestine Liberation  Organization: 

Not one penny to the PA until it repeals that law.

 

United Nations convenes to gather donations for UNRWA

New York – The UN General Assembly Committee will hold a meeting at United Nations Headquarters on Friday in a bid to bolster countries’ donations for the agency.

The UN refugee agency for Palestinians is funded almost entirely by voluntary contributions.

UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini said that solving the “chronic financial problem” facing the agency requires political will to match the support of the various parties to the UNRWA mission.

In a press conference in New York,  Lazzarini said that the problem “lies in the contradiction between what UNRWA is expected to do and the resources available to it,” pointing to “the unique nature of UNRWA’s work, as it is the only agency mandated to provide services similar to government services.”

The UN official stressed the importance of keeping up with the resources to the needs, warning that “UNRWA will not have funding or cash as of next September to continue operating its schools, and the resources necessary for the operation of its health centers and other vital services are running out.”

UNRWA supports about 5.9 million Palestine refugees in its five areas of operations: Jordan, Gaza, the West Bank including East Jerusalem, Lebanon and Syria.

Weekly Commentary: What If Bernard Lewis Was Right About Nuclear Iran Welcoming Apocalypse Rather Than Seeking Deterrence?

Weekly Commentary: What If Bernard Lewis Was Right About Nuclear Iran
Welcoming Apocalypse Rather Than Seeking Deterrence?
Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 1 June 2023

“mutual assured destruction, the deterrent that worked so well during the
Cold War, would have no meaning. At the end of time, there will be general
destruction anyway. What will matter will be the final destination of the
dead — hell for the infidels, and heaven for the believers. For people with
this mindset, MAD is not a constraint; it is an inducement.”
Bernard Lewis – The Wall Street Journal Aug. 8, 2006

It would appear that the overwhelming majority of Israelis participating in
policy discussions relating to the Iranian nuclear challenge think that Iran
seeks nukes to protect their leadership from regime change.

Unfortunately, these policy makers and analysts simply cannot comprehend
that Iranian Twelvers could actually welcome an apocalypse set into motion
by an Iranian nuclear strike and the response that would follow. Without
saying it explicitly, they are arguing that there is some set of universal
values that has some kind of veto power over belief systems when adhering to
those beliefs can have unsavory results when judged by these “universal
values”.

This is not an inconsequential academic disagreement.

The attitude of policy makers and analysts towards the threat of a nuclear
Iran would be radically different if they thought that there was even a 25%
chance that Bernard Lewis is correct.

I daresay that if they gave Bernard Lewis the weight his opinion deserves
that we would have already “pulled the trigger” on a massive operation long
ago.
________________________________________
IMRA – Independent Media Review and Analysis

Since 1992 providing news and analysis on the Middle East with a focus on
Arab-Israeli relations

Website: www.imra.org.il

Deciphering the headlines

According to the Oxford language website, deciphering is defined as “succeeding in understanding, interpreting or identifying something.”

Having the ability to do this is a requirement these days, especially as the print and online media revel in producing misleading headlines and news reports. Reading between the lines and deciphering ambiguous and contradictory narratives is essential if one hopes to discover real intentions and agendas.

Politicians love to speak in riddles and, where possible, to hide their true aims from the befuddled masses.

Quite often, their rhetoric reveals the whole story but more often than not the press releases will result in confusion.

This ability to scatter red herrings has been perfected, especially when it concerns Israel.

The following headline appeared in the 19 May edition of the Jerusalem Post: “Washington wants to make Jerusalem feel safe by showing it is serious about military co-operation (re. Iran) but also wants to discourage the Jewish State from actually using force against Tehran’s nuclear program.”

If you read this more closely, you will rapidly perceive that what it actually means is that the Biden Administration hopes to create a false sense of security so that Israeli decision-makers will be lulled into believing that the USA has its back. In actual fact, of course, if you decipher the real meaning, you will see that the Americans have no intention of doing what really needs to be done.

Naturally, if and when Israel decides that there are no other options to stop Iran’s rush to the nuclear missile threat, the US will wash its hands of any involvement.

There are already reports that some sort of sanctions relief may be in the works, and if these turn out to be correct, you can be sure that once again State Department experts will have sold us down the river. After all, if North Korea could acquire nuclear weapons thanks to US waffling and empty threats, then why can’t Iran do the same?

Indications that Israel is scheduled to be “sold down the river” are becoming clearer with every passing day. Biden’s top official dealing with Iran has within the last few days reiterated that diplomacy is the only way to resolve the Iranian headlong rush to nuclear weapons capability. It seems that Oman may be used as a convenient conduit to offer Iran inducements. Naturally, any thought that Washington may be embarking on a doomed appeasement path raises hackles. Anyone with even the slightest knowledge of history should instantly recognise the putrid odour of Neville Chamberlain’s futile attempt to placate a genocidal regime.

Unravelling the real meaning behind the headlines should be no great feat, yet so far, there has been stupefied silence from those who should be screaming from the rooftops.

Another example revolves around the statements issued on almost a daily basis by the internationally embraced “democratic” PA leadership, terror spokespersons and media commentators.

Two-faced UN and EU-sponsored pontifications abound where security forces actions to locate and punish terrorists are equated with the deeds of the murderers.

After Israel recently eliminated terror murderers, the Foreign Ministers of France, Egypt, Germany and Jordan, collectively known as the “Munich Group,” convened and expressed their “alarm at the new round of violence.”

The PA Ministry of Foreign Affairs had this to say: “Israel and its settler militias have NO sovereignty over Jerusalem or its holy sites.”

The PA Islamic Fatwa Council joined in: “Jewish tours of the Temple Mount are an open defiance of Muslims in various parts of the world.”

The senior political analyst at Al Jazeera wrote: “the Palestinians have every reason to hate Israel. It is a settler colonial apartheid State erected on the ruins of their homeland.”

If these expressions of “fraternal love” fail to register, the next two should hopefully clarify the real situation.

Abbas, our eternal “peace partner” had this to say: “the founding of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) fifty-nine years ago is one of the most important achievements in Palestinian policies.”

Suppose someone did not quite understand his UN diatribe to the General Assembly. In that case, Abbas has this week signed a decree making denial of the Nakba a criminal offence punishable by up to two years of incarceration.

It should not be too difficult to discern the real intent behind all these utterances. Despite clearly branding Israel as a catastrophic illegal creation and a malignant presence, a significant number of individuals, groups, nations and self-loathers promote these poisonous canards.

These days the dirty words have mutated and now “Jews, Zionists, Israel and settlers” are words attracting condemnation and punishment.

The fact that Netanyahu has not received an invitation to the White House since his re-election as PM excites many observers of the political scene. One would think that there are more than enough challenges at home to keep him busy without traipsing to Washington and meeting with a President who professes friendship but, in actuality, heads a political party increasingly hostile to Israel.

Jill Biden will shortly be visiting Jordan, Egypt, Morocco and Portugal. Apparently, Israel is not on her itinerary, and presumably, this is intended to send a message. Joe is busy meddling in Israel’s internal discussions about law reforms and its handling of Palestinian Arab terror all of which is not playing out according to the State Department script. It seems that even a royal wedding in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan cannot lure the US President to the region which is just as well because who knows what mayhem may result if he were to speak.

News reports surface on a weekly basis implying that Saudi Arabia is on its way to recognising Israel. When one deciphers the mixed messages and dispels the fog surrounding this supposed momentous event one soon ascertains that contrary to the wildly euphoric headlines, there are insurmountable obstacles ahead. Like all such mirages in the desert, full and genuine peace without conditions and tricks can only be achieved after illusions are shattered.

Shattering ingrained illusions on the part of Palestinian Arabs who demand Israel’s disappearance is nowhere in sight. Unless and until the deep-seated hate and denial of historical truth is uprooted in Arab and Islamic societies, one can forget about any sort of impending love fest.

As media watch groups can attest, when it comes to Israel, any sort of accurate reporting is hard to find.

 

UNRWA Donor Conference 2023

The Ad Hoc Committee to Announce Voluntary Contributions to UNRWA will meet on 2 June 2023 at 10am in Conference Room 4. The Secretary-General will be present and will make a statement to Member States on the vital role UNRWA continues to play in the delivery of humanitarian assistance and stability in the region.

The Secretary-General urges all Member States to announce new or increased contributions, particularly to UNRWA’s program budget.

As a United Nations agency established by the General Assembly in 1949, UNRWA has a mandate to provide assistance and protection to more than 5.7 million registered Palestinian refugees. Its mission is to help Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip to achieve their full human development potential until a just and lasting solution to their plight is found. UNRWA services include education, healthcare, relief and social services, camp infrastructure and improvement, shelter and microfinance.

UNRWA expects UN Member States to:

  • Reaffirm your political commitment and solidarity with the Palestine refugees;
  • Mobilizing international support and advocacy for the Agency’s work and its relentless commitment to United Nations values, including achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and realizing the 2030 Agenda;
  • Resolving the Agency’s funding situation, which is currently unpredictable and unsustainable, to avoid recurring funding crises.

‘An ugly scar on Israel’s justice system’

Attorney Avigdor Feldman, who represented Amiram Ben Uliel before the Supreme Court, claims that Ben Uliel’s confession was obtained under torture and should be treated as such. Feldman was hosted on Arutz 7 Hebrew site against a backdrop of calls to allow Amiram to celebrate Shavuot outside his solitary confinement. Although this was agreed to, it did not happen.

“In my opinion, Ben Uliel’s verdict is an ugly scar on our legal system,” says Feldman. “The General Security Service admitted in this case, which it does not do in other cases, that they inflicted incessant physical torture on Amiram for two nights. I am forbidden to provide details of the torture, but it is the type that causes continuous physical pain. The court rejected the confessions made immediately after the torture, but accepted his confessions given 36 hours later.

“The court ignored the fact that Ben Uliel was prevented from meeting with a lawyer during those 36 hours and that he was completely under the authority of the Shin Bet, making the threat of continued torture a constant possibility. In my understanding, the court should have rejected ALL confessions made by Ben Uliel.”

Feldman emphasizes that aside from these confessions, there is no evidence linking Ben Uliel to the crime he is accused of (arson in the Arab village of Duma). As for the claim that there is sufficient evidence of his guilt due to the details that Ben-Uliel gave to his investigators, attorney Feldman states, “Absolutely not. The details in his confessions were public knowledge. There are no unique details in them that could have been known only to the person who committed the crime.

“There is absolutely no forensic or biological evidence that ties him to the crime.”

In Feldman’s eyes, Ben Uliel should be released immediately. “They had no evidence against him until they started torturing him. There is no evidence from the field that could support his confession made to the Shin Bet operative who was responsible for the torture.”

Ben Uliel was returned to the site of the crime for a re-enactment of the crime with a policeman and a Shin Bet agent who threatened that if he did not confess, they had other means of making him talk, implying that the torture would resume.

Feldman also pointed out that the defense argued that the confession might have been admissible if Ben Uliel had been allowed to consult with a lawyer between the confessions, and if the interrogation would have been conducted by the Israel Police and not by the Shin Bet. “But none of this happened. On the contrary. The Shin Bet was present in a threatening manner during the confessions. When Ben Uliel finally met with his lawyer, Itamar Ben Gvir (now a gov’t minister), he retracted the confession. Therefore, his confession is a confession that was extracted under torture and our experience shows that confessions obtained through torture are usually false. They are coerced confessions to satisfy what the torturer and provide him with what he wants to hear. ”

Attorney Feldman pointed out that it was clear to the investigators that there was more than one person at the scene of the incident, and for that reason, they interrogated a Jewish minor, trying to implicate him, but he did not confess. “The Shin Bet admits that the torture produced a confession that does not match the facts on the ground. “

“Everyone agrees that torture may be acceptable in the case of a ‘ticking bomb,’ where the suspect is aware of a person who is planning to commit an imminent terrorist act threatening human life. Even the Supreme Court, which ruled out torture as a means of obtaining confessions, ruled that any means can be used to extract information to prevent a terror attack.

“However, no one ever claimed that Ben Uliel knew about anyone intending to carry out a terrorist act against Palestinians or others,” says Feldman. ”Therefore, he was tortured without fitting the profile of a ticking bomb.”

 

As for Ben Uliel’s chances of getting acquitted, Feldman says he doesn’t know.

“He was denied another hearing, which in my opinion, is very problematic and controversial. Regarding a retrial, this depends on whether additional evidence is found that will disprove his involvement in the matter.”

 

A version of this article by Yoni Kempinski appeared on Arutz Sheva’s Hebrew site and was translated and edited by Ms. Shulman.

Saudi Normalization Does Not Mean Peace

Saudi Arabia heads the Arab League of Nations, whose charter, adopted in 1945, calls for the liquidation of the Jews in Palestine. Notably, Saudi Arabia and the Arab League launched total war on Israel in 1948 – a war that remains in effect until today.

Egypt and Jordan signed peace treaties with Israel; Syria and Lebanon agreed to an armistice with the Jewish state; Saudi Arabia, however, loyal to the Arab League, has never agreed to any armistice or any peace whatsoever with the Jews.

What should Saudi peace normalization look like?

Begin with four steps:

1. Since the Saudis continue to finance PA education, the Saudis could demand removal of violent PA texts, teachers, youth clubs and summer camps in the Saudi-financed curriculum, which promotes full- scale war against Jews. It would fly in the face of normalization for peace if the Saudis continued to underwrite the PA war curriculum. The Saudis refuse to reconsider their financing of UNRWA schools, which indoctrinate the next generation of Palestinians for total war.

2. Saudi Arabia remains a key funder of UNRWA, which maintains 6.7 million descendants of Arab refugees from the 1948 war in the squalor of 59 “temporary” UNRWA refugee camps, under the premise of the “right of return” to 1948 villages that no longer exist. If the Saudis truly sought normalization for peace, they would advocate the dignified resettlement of Arab refugees. Yet, the Saudis refuse to do so.

3. The Saudis help finance the unprecedented PA statute: Murder a Jew, get a salary for life. How can there be normalization for peace so long as the Saudis underwrite the enforcement of an incentive for murdering Jews?

4. The Saudis could demand the removal of PA maps that delete Israel in Saudi-financed PA schools. The PA has recently replaced names of all Jewish communities in Israel with names of Arab villages in all Saudi-funded schools of the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA.

Saudi normalization in the context of peace would necessitate the presentation of maps in all schools that would depict all UN members of good standing, including Israel.

These four steps would provide normalization that would lead to peace with Saudi Arabia.

Yet normalization for peace is not on the agenda of Saudi Arabia, whose genocidal war launched at the dawn of Israel in 1948 continues to this day.

For the Saudis, normalization is a tool of war.

Those who support such normalization focus on business opportunities. Why would veterans of the IDF support such a policy? Look no farther than their handsome Saudi investment portfolios.

Nothing like a little bakshish, a gratuity, to sweeten the deal.

Bakshish is acceptable in Arabic society. Everywhere else, bakshish is defined as a bribe.

People must remember that Israel is the land of prophets, not the oasis of their profits.