Statement Regarding Misrepresentation in The Times Article Published on June 7th 2024

We generally do not respond to press articles. However, due to the cynical exploitation of our interviews in the article published online by The Times Magazine on June 7, 2024, we feel compelled to depart from our policy.

Since October 7th we have been working actively to amplify the voices of sexual assault victims, especially in forums where such voices are often ignored. In this context, we agreed to be interviewed about the sexual violence that occurred on October 7.

Regrettably, the published article misrepresented our words, twisting them to convey the impression that we support the prejudiced argument that claims of sexual violence are being manipulated by Israel. The article aims to discredit and gaslight the victims of heinous acts of sexual violence. Hence, much of what we said was omitted, and only selective excerpts were used, taken out of context to serve the article’s agenda.

We are shocked and disappointed by the exploitation of our willingness to be interviewed and the attempt to use our expertise to give credence to the reporters’ views. The article joins those who are guilty of the unacceptable politicization of sexual violence. In this instance, the reporters’ agenda replaced the professional and ethical commitment to presenting evidence accurately.

As specialists, we are acutely aware of the attempts to manipulate public opinion at the victims’ expense, and we are walking cautiously in this minefield. understand the profound mental struggles victims endure and the delicate balance required in addressing these issues. It is our duty to ensure that the full extent of what happened is acknowledged. The use of sexual violence as a weapon of war was a significant part of the October 7 attack. Denying the evidence of such violence has become a disturbing aspect of the global pro-Palestinian discourse, adversely affecting the well-being of sexual violence survivors of the massacre, as well as survivors everywhere.

Prof. Ruth Halperin-Kaddari, of hashtagTheDinahProject 7/10 and Academic Director of The Rackman Center מרכז רקמן Bar-Ilan University; former Vice-President of the hashtagUN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (hashtagCEDAW)

Dr. Sarai Aharoni, Head of the Gender Studies Program, Ben Gurion University

Orit Sulitzeanu CEO, The Association of Rape Crisis Centers in Israel

UN Schools Caught Teaching Arab Children to Wage Jihad on Jews

Using funding from Western taxpayers, and Americans in particular, United Nations schools are teaching Arab children to glorify terrorism and wage constant war against their Jewish neighbors, according to a new film. In the explosive documentary released late last month by a pro-Israel watchdog group, schools run by the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) are even exposed offering military-style training to young children. That training, combined with a curriculum that teaches fervent hatred of Jews, is a recipe for disaster, the producer said, citing the recent wave of attacks. But now, U.S. lawmakers are speaking out, with media reports saying that legislation is being considered to yank funding from the UN-run schools.

The film, produced by the Center for Near East Policy Research, shows numerous young children proudly celebrating the murder of Jews and explaining what they learned in their UN schools. Children also appear on camera vowing to fight for the Islamic State, or ISIS, and calmly explaining how they hope to become suicide bombers someday. Others boast that, one day, they hope to stab, shoot, or run down Jews with cars. The new material, released on May 27, comes amid a fresh surge in terrorist attacks in Israel, with more than 2,200 attacks by Arabs on Jews since last September. Dozens of victims have been killed in the attacks, with close to 500 wounded.

The short documentary, entitled “The UNRWA Road to Terror: Palestinian Classroom Incitement,” argues that the source of much of the violence is the pseudo-education being offered in UN schools on UN facilities funded by U.S. taxpayer dollars. “A closer look reveals that the uprising has hardly been spontaneous,” says the narrator as video of recent brutal stabbings and killings plays in the background. “Its roots derive from an education curriculum taught to Palestinians beginning in the first grade.” That is followed by film from inside the UN classroom, with an adult leading very young children in chanting that Israeli territory is actually Arab, “from the river to the sea.” Many of the terrorists behind recent attacks were educated in the UN schools, the film states.

Controversy has swirled around the UNRWA and UN schools in the region for years. In 2014, for example, the UN faced a tsunami of criticism after caches of rockets were found hidden at a UN-run school in Gaza — and then handed to Hamas terrorists by UN workers under the guise of passing the deadly weapons to “local authorities.” In 2012, meanwhile, the UN schools came under international criticism for using pro-terror, anti-American textbooks in education. Two years ago, a similar video was released showing UN schools offering jihad lessons to young Arabs. Yet the problem continues, with the Center for Near East Policy Research saying that the material in the latest video is brand new.

Americans should be concerned, too, considering the fact that U.S. taxpayers have poured some $4 billion into the UN bureaucracy responsible for running the schools. “This is an American issue,” explained David Bedein, director of the group behind the documentary. “It’s an American issue because the U.S. government spends $400 million per year — more than $1 million every single day — on UNRWA which is indoctrinating these children for war. And it’s all in a UN facility, which makes it even more ridiculous. People assume UN facilities would teach peace. But if you look at our films, you’ll see it’s exactly the opposite.”

The Center for Near East Policy Research has been reaching out to lawmakers in the United States and other Western governments that fund UNRWA. But the public must also be aware of what is happening. “The most important thing would be for Americans — liberals, conservatives, Jews, gentiles — to stand up and say, if we’re going to finance the UNRWA system, there should be a new education system, a new curriculum, which advocates peace and reconciliation, not war, and which works toward the re-settlement of these people,” Bedein said.

And the problem is urgent, he added. Consider, for example, that the film shows young children engaged in what appears to be military-style training with dummy firearms. “The thing to understand is that these schools, they’ve developed a full-scale military-training system,” continued Bedein, also a longtime journalist. “How many people realize that there’s military training going on in these camps? It’s not even just hate education, it’s war education. The education for the last 16 years, the school system has been devoted to indoctrinating children to make war on the Jews.” And the results are obvious.

At the center of the controversial curriculum is what is known as the “right of return,” the argument that Arabs who lived in present-day Israel in 1948, and their descendants, should be allowed to re-settle there someday. “Right now the curriculum is based on preparing children for the armed struggle against Israel invoking what they call the right of return,” continued Bedein. “There’s no reason to keep these people in camps under the false promise of the right of return. The right of return was predicated on one thing: The desire of the refugees to go back and live in peace with the Jews. There is no sign of that happening.”

Bedein said that Arabs have been in the UN “refugee camps” since the 1950s under the premise of right of return, including some three-fourths of the people of Gaza. “They are told by UNRWA that the only rehabilitation they are to take is to go back to the homes they left in 1948, which are now Israeli cities,” he said. It is time for some serious reforms, Bedein added, calling the notion of return pushed by UN textbooks an unrealistic recipe for perpetuating disaster. Rather than drumming the fantasy into the heads of Arab children, they should be offered something other than the current “refugees in perpetuity” status. And the violence and violent mindsets perpetuated by the UN schools need to stop, he said.

“If this was financed by Iran, we couldn’t do too much,” said Bedein, who has been researching UNRWA for some three decades. “But because this is financed by the United States, the largest donor, there’s no reason that this should be happening.” Right now, he continued, donor governments, mostly from the West, “drop money on the UNRWA and its camps like manna from heaven, with no controls, no constraints, whatsoever, and that’s pretty bad.” So he and others plan to keep pushing for change, “trying to expose what’s going on, with a mind toward reforming the UNRWA system.”

The group director also said that “plenty of Palestinian Arabs identify with our cause — they don’t want to be patronized, and told that they have to go back to where they came from in ’48,” he said. “It’s ridiculous.” The documentary has already been shown to people on Capitol Hill, and Bedein’s organization plans to bring in Arabic experts to explain to lawmakers what is in the UN schools’ curriculum and programs. It has also been covered in multiple news reports across Israel and the United States.

UNRWA officials blasted Bedein and other critics, with spokesman Christopher Gunness telling Fox News that it was “being duped by David Bedein.” According to Gunness, Bedein and his crew obtained the footage of children at UN schools promoting terrorism by asking “leading questions” such as “how much do you hate Jews?” The UN official also told Fox and other outlets that Bedein had shown Arab schools not run by the UN, and teachers who claimed to work for the UN but who in fact did not. The U.S. State Department reportedly investigated the allegations and urged the UNRWA to do the same, but also claimed that previous allegations by Bedein in the past had been “debunked.” The UN’s Gunness said the materials had been reviewed in the past and found to be “largely” free of incitement.

However, a Palestinian human rights activist and political analyst quoted by Fox News, Bassam Eid, said the documentary was accurate. “The film accurately portrays UNRWA school,” explained Eid, described by Fox as a “leading Palestinian human rights expert.” The expert also told Fox that “advocacy of violence remains rampant dictated by teachers who run the U.S.-funded UNRWA schools.”

When asked how he and his team obtained the footage, Bedein said they sent in an American and some Palestinian stringers into the schools, and that the promotion of violence was not concealed at all. “They don’t even hide it,” Bedein said. “The [Palestine Liberation Organization] is very proud of what it’s doing in the classroom.”

U.S. lawmakers expressed outrage that American funds were supporting the controversial UN schools. Representative Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.), for example, told Fox News that major reforms of the UN’s schools were needed. “It is a crime against humanity, an outrage, and does not in any way prepare the Palestinian population or future generations of Palestinians for peace with Israelis,” the congressman said. “It is unacceptable that the international community, including the United States, is funding UNRWA without demanding change.”

Speaking to the Jerusalem Post, Lamborn echoed those remarks. “Congress has been asking questions about UNRWA for years, and it is important that we continue to do so until we are sure that the curriculum used and the teaching the children receive does not poison their minds,” Lamborn said. “Textbooks and other materials that delegitimize Israel, denigrate the Jewish people, promote the ‘right of return’ through violent struggle, and glorify martyrdom must be banned.” Bedein said the film will be shown to lawmakers around the West in an effort to highlight the threat posed by the UN schools, and to secure meaningful reforms.

Meanwhile, other U.S. lawmakers are working to evict the UN from U.S. soil and cancel American membership in the outfit, often ridiculed as the “dictators club” in America. Citing, among many other concerns, systemic anti-Israel bias that some critics have even dubbed anti-Semitism, Representative Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) introduced the American Sovereignty Restoration Act to have the U.S. government withdraw from the UN and pull all funding. As evidence of anti-Israel bias at the UN, critics point out that more than half of the resolutions by the UN Human Rights Council criticizing governments were condemnations of Israel.


Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com

‘Deceit of an Ally’: Former NSA Official Claims US Knew Arabs Would Attack Israel in 1973 but Deceived Israelis

An American-Israeli who worked for the U.S. National Security Agency more than 50 years ago claims that American intelligence agents knew – beyond a shadow of a doubt – that Egypt and Syria were going to attack Israel in 1973 on Yom Kippur, the holiest day on the Jewish calendar.

Israel’s government was taken by surprise that day, and it almost led to a stunning defeat of Israel by the Arab armies.

Bruce Brill talked with CBN News about the drama of that dangerous period and his recent book, Deceit of an Ally. At a time when intelligence failures are at the forefront of the thinking of many in Israel, Brill’s book is a timely recollection.

To watch the interview with Bruce Brill, click here.

Julie Stahl is a correspondent for CBN News in the Middle East.  A Hebrew speaker, she has been covering news in Israel fulltime for more than 20 years.

Foolish Folly

Absurdity knows no bounds when it concerns Israel, as this past week once again demonstrates.

Collective insanity is running rampant and unchecked as university administrators buckle in the face of mob mayhem and politicians prostrate themselves at the altar of electoral appeasement.

Once again Biden blunders, knowing not what he is doing and Blinken blinks in the headlights of looming jihadist terror threats. In urging Israel to surrender to Hamas these leaders think they can sell something which has proven to be a spectacular disaster in past scenarios.

Terror group psychological warfare designed to produce maximum pressure on Israel is now the preferred means to beat Israel into line.

The latest folly is trying to sell a “ceasefire” in Gaza before any still alive or most probably dead hostages have been released by the terror groups.

Biden is desperately trying to sell this latest sell-out to terrorism as an Israeli-authored scheme, but it seems obvious that this is stretching reality. While some of the elements may have been borrowed from suggestions made by Israel’s negotiators, the fact remains that its essential objective is an Israeli surrender to Hamas. Biden claimed that Hamas is no longer a force to be reckoned with, while at the same time, one of his security advisers maintained that it is impossible to eliminate it.

The prospect of billions of dollars being funnelled into terror fiscal holes looms large. Promises of a demilitarized Gaza (or fake Palestine) combined with a full Israeli withdrawal and ceasefires are figments of warped minds that have learnt nothing from past disasters.

In reality, the only basis for any sort of ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal is the release of ALL hostages (dead and alive) and the elimination of the terror infrastructure and terror enablers in their entirety.

Biden and Blinken are peddling a tainted bill of goods which, if swallowed, would constitute a victory for all terror appeasers and guarantee that others such as Hezbollah and Iran would, without a doubt, have their appetite whetted for further murderous action.

If there are still those who believe that the Biden Administration’s schemes herald the advent of true peace and tolerance, they should take a reality check and scan past such hallucinatory nightmares.

The long list of “deals that are so good one only turns them down at ones peril” is a warning to all those eager to embrace the current fatally flawed offerings from Washington.

 The first red flag is that Qatar, among others, is an enthusiastic backer. Qatar is a major financier and supporter of Hamas and everything it represents. Shouldn’t that fact alone be ringing warning bells? Obviously, neither American officials nor knee-jerk Israel haters find anything suspicious in this because they continue to expect that Israel agrees to each and every demand.

The next red flag revolves around past performance.

Wouldn’t it be prudent to have a long, hard look at how previous scenarios which America has been involved with have actually turned out?

Vietnam was not exactly a roaring success as far as US guarantees of democracy and human rights were concerned. Those Vietnamese relying on American protection in their fight for a democratic country found themselves sold down the river as the US abandoned them.

Iraqis hoping for a better and more tolerant life after the defeat of Saddam Hussein were rapidly disillusioned as the US abandoned them to the jihadist forces financed by Iran.

Afghanis, believing American promises and guarantees of equality, were brutally let down as the US abandoned them and scuttled out of the country as fast as the helicopters and planes could manage. Left behind were all those who had worked to bring some semblance of normality to a country ravaged by Islamic extremism. Abandoned were all Afghani women who now have been enslaved back into an oppressive medieval society.

Yazidis and Kurds have been let down as they face genocide and annihilation at the hands of jihadists and Turkish terror actions. Erdogan, the aspiring neo-Ottoman Sultan, remains a valued member of NATO. His war against the Kurds and his increasingly venomous tirades against Israel cause nary a ripple in Washington.

The reality that a rag-tag group of Houthis with Iranian logistical support can continue to wreak piratical terror on international shipping and trade speaks volumes about the halfhearted responses by the US.

Ukraine believed American guarantees of safeguarding its sovereignty against Russian aggression. Wavering, waffling and weak leadership in Washington makes that promise a doubtful commodity.

The Iranian Mullah regime looks on as North Korea thumbs its nose at Biden and as it fires off missiles. Having called America’s bluff and attained nuclear blackmail capability the Iranians know that they can do the same. Biden and Blinken may huff and puff but there is nothing more certain than Tehran will soon follow North Korea down the nuclear extortionist path.

“We have your back” proclaim the Washington appeasement choir. The fact that US warships shot down some Iranian-launched missiles at Israel is somehow supposed to prove that Israel can place its faith in pie-in-the-sky guarantees. What can one expect in the future when American threats to suspend weapon deliveries are made, because Israel is trying to eliminate those dedicated to its demise?

Hezbollah, which has made northern Israeli towns uninhabitable, will need to be dealt with and the Iranian threats of genocide tackled.

If the Gaza campaign is anything to go by, just imagine the reaction from Biden and Blinken and the UN when the balloon goes up on the other fronts.

What sense of security must Taiwan and South Korea be experiencing when they can witness the indecisive charades now taking place?

Look at the farce of the US floating pier in Gaza to get an inkling of how easily reality can destroy the best delusory mirages. In an effort to appease the increasingly strident and extreme left wing of the Democrat party a plan was hatched which allegedly was going to save the residents of Gaza from mass starvation. The fact that there is no such starvation is irrelevant because like every other Jewish conspiracy over the ages, once spread it takes on a life of its own.

Amidst much fanfare and hype, the US touted its intention to build a pier off the Gaza coast. Over two months later and after an expenditure of US$320 million this so called marvel of American engineering was ready to receive aid shipped in from Cyprus. No sooner had the first shipments arrived than the weather became stormy and as a result the floating pier disintegrated with parts of it sunk and other pieces ending up on the coast of Ashdod. This structure lasted exactly 12 days and delivered less than 60 truckloads worth of food.

It subsequently transpired that the majority of the food aid is stolen by Hamas which no doubt accounts for stories of food deprivation among ordinary Gazans. This fact naturally was not advertised by the State Department nor has it been reported by the general media. It is after all much easier to blame the dastardly Israelis and conniving Jews.

It has been disclosed by the IDF that Hamas stole US$100 million from Gaza banks.

One has to ask how, given the above facts, Israel can agree to hair-brained plans that leave terror groups in control of Gaza, let alone in charge of “Palestine.”  The latest pearl of wisdom from the US “experts” is that getting a ceasefire is the main objective and “that the role of Hamas in a post war Gaza can be ironed out later.” This is yet another surefire recipe for continued terror rule in Gaza and further proof of the clueless appeasement fervour gripping those in charge.

This brings us to yet another “brilliant” plan concocted in Washington.

It is wondrous to witness the political contortions taking place as American officials and diplomats try every trick in the book to pressure Israel into falling into the embrace of Saudi Arabia. Undoubtedly a peace agreement between both countries would be beneficial to all concerned. It must, however, have as its primary objective the recognition that Israel is the historical and legal homeland of the Jewish People. No amount of doublespeak by US diplomats, and officials can disguise the fact that what is being currently offered does no such thing.

Desperation for some sort of electoral boost at Israel’s expense is a non starter. The Saudi Foreign Minister has made his country’s position very clear. He stated, “Israel cannot exist without Palestine on the 1967 borders.”

Hamas, the Road to 7th October 2023

In this chapter I will examine the changes in the ethos of conflict of the Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip, following the generational revolution in the Hamas leadership that resulted from the exchange deal with Israel in 2011, in which 1,027 Palestinian prisoners were released from Israeli prisons in exchange for a single Israeli soldier. During the decades of their imprisonment, the released prisoners, all members of the Hamas military branch, had undergone a process of militant radicalization, increased religious-based patriotic national beliefs and preparation towards integration into the leadership of Hamas. They considered themselves the jihad generation .

Under the leadership of Yahya Synwar, the new leadership of those released from prison developed. In a short period of time, Synwar succeeded in gaining control of the Hamas leadership. In the midst of the religious Dawa and national indoctrination, whose core was the cultivation and assimilation of the right of return to pre-1948 Palestine, he recruited a new generation of jihadists and by applying a strategy of gradual escalation, paved the way for the attack on the 7th of October 2023, triggering the Middle East into warmongering chaos.

The Dead Sea Museum launches an unprecedented series of NFTs

 The Dead Sea Dead Sea Museum, an art museum to be built in Arad, has launched its first NFT collection of sea photos. The project was led by environmental and artistic activist Noam Bedein, founder of  the Dead Sea Dead Sea Revival Project.

The collection of 100 selected images, called Genesis NFT, highlights the beauty that “disappears from  the Dead Sea to raise environmental awareness about the world wonder,” according to a statement from the museum.

Via OpenSea

Bedein is the first to document the site of the Dead Sea World Heritage by boat only and has a database of more than 25.000 photos from the last six years. The images show a rarely seen side of the lowest point on earth.

The auction of these NFTs took place on March 22, in line with World Water Day. All proceeds from the sale will be used for museum planning and for legal and legislative efforts to restore  Dead Sea water.

Images from the collection can be seen here.

15 minute compilation of our movies which weshall present for the legislative bodies of UNRWA donor nations and the Knesset.

15 minute compilation of our movies which we shall present for the legislative bodies of UNRWA donor nations and the Knesset.

People do  not have the patience to wade through 20 movies to discern evidence of incitement and indoctrination in unrwa schools and summer camps.
 
 
So we have now commissioned a 15 minute compilation of our  movies which weshall present for the legislative bodies of UNRWA donor nations and the Knesset.

 

 בעברית: HEBREW

 
 באנגלית: ENGLISH

 

Israel, Jews and Peace in Schoolbooks and Teachers’ Guides Used in UNRWA Schools in Judea, Samaria,East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip

Introduction
  • The schoolbooks issued by the Palestinian Authority (PA) are mandatorily used in all areas of Judea, Samaria, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem (In schools that follow the PA curriculum) – in government, private and UNRWA schools. The books surveyed here are of the latest edition and are used in the current school year. They were mostly published in 2020. Teachers’ guides, mostly published in 2018, were examined as well. They shed special light on the PA indoctrination process which is also applied in UNRWA schools.
  • There are three fundamentals in these books related to the conflict:
  • De-Legitimization of the State of Israel’s existence and of the mere presence of its Jewish citizens in the country, which also includes denial of their history and the very existence of their holy places there.
  • Demonization of Israel, as well as the Jews – not only in the context of the conflict, but also from a religious point of view, which carries grave implications as far as the Jews’ image is concerned in the eyes of Palestinian children who mostly grow up in a traditional society.
  • Absence of any advocacy for peace with Israel. Instead, the books call for a violent struggle for the liberation of the country in its entirety, including Israel’s territory within its pre-1967 boundaries. This struggle is given a religious character, and terror constitutes an integral part thereof – with the accompanying meaning that the killing of Jews is to be encouraged.
  • Following are selected examples of these three fundamentals taken from schoolbooks and teachers’ guides in use in UNRWA’s school system (grades 1-10).

Pariahs

When the morally degenerate international community brands the world’s only Jewish nation as a pariah you can guarantee that it won’t stop there.

The next step is to label the Jewish People as pariahs.

This word is commonly defined as “someone who is avoided or not accepted by a social group, especially because he or she is not liked, respected or trusted. Basically, they are an outcast.”

Looking back over the last two thousand years or so does this not perfectly fit the attitudes and actions of the rest of the world towards their local Jewish inhabitants? I did not use the word “citizens” because, for much of that period, Jews were denied full civil rights. Even when full citizenship was grudgingly given, it did not, in the long run, guarantee any equal opportunity for a safe and tranquil future.

The oppressed masses that fled from the pogroms of Russia, Poland and other hate-soaked European countries to the seemingly welcome shores of the Golden Medina (America) quickly discovered that university quotas existed to keep them out of the Ivy League universities and medical schools. Eventually, after much hardship and effort, these new immigrants clawed their way up the economic ladder, with some of them acquiring an acceptable status in society.

This acceptability was always going to be transient. With Jewish refugees from Nazism shut out and large vocal support for fascism and isolationism those who thought that pariah status was a thing of the past started to worry. The horrors of the Holocaust and post-war euphoria for re-establishing Jewish sovereignty seemed to herald a new golden era for American Jewry.

Recent realities should have shattered these myopic mirages not only in the USA but also on every continent where the ancient virus has reawakened with renewed deadly effects.

Pariah status has once again become the designated label by which the Jewish State and Jews worldwide are becoming known.

For those in the Diaspora who had been seduced by a few years of tolerance and tranquillity, this restored reality has come as a shattering shock. Once released from the bottle the genies of hate cannot be put back. No amount of wishful thinking and sweeping under the carpet will banish the brutal truth that dangerous times are here again.

Who could have imagined that universities would once again morph into bastions of Jew hate with mobs demanding that the likes of Hillel and Chabad be banned because they “support” Israel? Slogans daubed on Jewish school walls and gunfire directed at such places has become a daily feature. In some countries, the police stand helplessly by as demonstrators hurl vile invective and shout the most deranged chants against Jews.

One of the most bizarre phenomena is those purporting to be Jews who have joined these groups mouthing slanderous lies against Israel.

This shameful spectacle is only surpassed by the sight of self loathers participating in mass orgies of organized hate festivities. One can understand the actions of Jewish communities who are virtual hostages in their respective countries. The Jews of Iran have no alternative but to show solidarity with their Government. We could question why they are still residing there. However, the sight of Neturei Karta leaders from overseas marching in solidarity with mobs shouting death to Israel and mourning the demise of Iran’s President highlights an incurable malady.

Some worry that being labelled a pariah is akin to a death sentence.

That is exactly what our accusers want us to be afraid of because by succumbing to this bogey, we help the haters achieve their aims. If only Jews would surrender en masse, lie down and disappear the rest of the world could do what it does best. Eulogizing us and perhaps standing for a minute’s silence will follow, although given today’s reality, that is not guaranteed.

The fact that Israelis fight back is something the rest of the world finds intolerable, especially as the age-old Jewish default position was one of defenceless submission.

When the real pariah nations are themselves getting away with murder and escaping any sort of retribution you know that there is something seriously wrong.

When UN members stand in silent tribute to the deceased “butcher of Tehran” and democratic leaders issue nauseating obituaries, you should be able to detect more than a whiff of craven appeasement.

When reports suggest that the Biden Administration is urging allies not to rebuke and censure Iran over its nuclear duplicity, it is obvious that nothing serious will be done to thwart their genocidal ambitions.

When the head of the IAEA plaintively reveals that Iran is not cooperating and has almost reached nuclear breakout capability and the rest of the world reacts by yawning, it is time to prepare for action.

When the failed Government of South Africa hauls Israel in front of the ICJ and all the other real pariah nations line up to the lynching, you can surmise that the lunatics have already taken over the asylum.

When Israel’s Ministers are threatened with arrest warrants while countless leaders of countries engaging in real genocidal acts against their own citizens and others get away with murder, it is patently obvious that something rotten is festering.

The German Chancellor was asked to respond to the threat of international arrest warrants against Israel’s officials. He responded that Germany would, if such warrants were issued, comply with its demands. This response shocked some naïve people but in reality they should not have been surprised. Germans have a proven track record when it comes to following orders against Jews, no matter how illegal and outrageous they may be.

Take the recent decision of Norway, Ireland and Spain to recognize a fake Palestine based on equally fake 1967 “borders” with Jerusalem as its Capital.

The name Quisling will always be associated with Norway because he and the Norwegian Nazis made every effort to persecute and deport Norwegian Jews to concentration camps. Jews were made pariahs and ended up paying the ultimate sacrifice. The name Oslo will forever be associated with one of the greatest acts of folly to be perpetrated against Israel.

Ireland’s refusal to join the war against Germany and remain neutral was a symptom of the deep hate that the Irish nationalists had against the British. Irish hypocrisy reached a peak when following Hitler’s death, the Irish Government issued official condolences to the Nazi administration, which only had a short while to exist. Today, Irish support for the terror aspirations of the PLO/Hamas and their associated willing partners is expressed in joining every anti-Israel condemnation.

Spain has a long and sordid history of turning Jews into pariahs with its inquisitions, forced conversions and mass expulsion. For a very short while it seemed that a golden age for Jews had returned but current policies threaten to return the situation back to the bad old days.

Proof that recognizing “Palestine” plays into the hands of those whose agenda is the eradication of Jews “from the river to the sea” can be seen in the map published by the PA’s Fatah movement. In thanking countries for recognition the map shows the whole of Israel “from the river to the sea” as Palestine. This is the reality which Norway, Spain and Ireland and no doubt the rest of the UN have signed up to.

Those who lemming-like to yearn to reward terrorists with yet another terror State should take note of what Ernest Bevin stated in 1947. The British Foreign Secretary at the time and certainly no friend of Jews and their desire to regain sovereignty made this statement as the UK prepared to give up the mandate.

“HM Government has been faced with an irreconcilable conflict of principles. For the Jews the essential point of principle is the creation of a sovereign Jewish State. For the Arabs the essential point of principle is to resist to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in ANY part of mandated Palestine.”

 Take note that this statement was made after the Arabs rejected the very notion of an Arab State living in democratic peace and tranquility with a Jewish State.

If Ernest Bevin could understand the fundamental agenda of the rejectionist Arabs, what is it that today’s sponsors of a terror State do not want to internalize?

The simple answer is that they prefer to trip down the well-worn path of tarring Israel, the historic State of the Jewish People, with the age-old badge of being a pariah.

We have suffered and survived this appellation many times during our long historical journey.

I have no doubts that we will do so again well after our adversaries have been trashed and vanished.

Michael Kuttner is a Jewish New Zealander who for many years was actively involved with various communal organisations connected to Judaism and Israel. He now lives in Israel and is J-Wire’s correspondent in the region.