How Can the White House Describe Arafat’s Speech as “Positive”?

The White House today said that Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat’s speech today in Ramallah was “positive”.

In the speech Arafat set the rules for the continuing war against Israel -“We have announced in the past, and we reiterate in our announcement today, our rejection of all kinds of operations that target Israeli civilians ” – military targets (and in the past this has included high school students since they are “almost” in the army) and settlers remain fair game. It should be noted that it is typical of nations at war to claim that they do not intend to target the enemy’s civilian population – Arafat’s “positive” declaration goes no farther than that.

In addition, in the course of discussing the agreement he sought to reach with Israel, Arafat made several references to the Khudaibiya agreement (Israel Television Channel Two broadcast two instances – for some reason most reports of the speech ignored it). The Khudaibiya agreement was a 10-year peace treaty between Mohammed and the tribe of Qureish. After two years, when Mohammed had improved his military position, he tore up the agreement and slaughtered the Qureishites. Salab a-Din was the Muslim leader who, after a cease-fire, declared a jihad against the Crusaders and conquered Jerusalem.

Does Washington really think it is “positive” for Arafat, in gross violation of Oslo, to place restrictions only on attacks against Israeli civilians within the Green Line (and this only because it is bad PR)?

Does Washington think it is “positive” for Arafat to tell his people that he seeks a temporary deal with Israel to be trashed when the opportunity to destroy Israel presents itself?

And finally, when will Washington sit down and study the meaning of what Arafat says before jumping to applaud?

Speech of Arafat in front of the Palestinian National Council: May 15, 2002

In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. We will, without doubt, help our messengers and those who believe, both in this world’s life and on the Day when the witnesses will stand forth. [Koranic verse]

Brother Ahmad Quray, Abu-Ala, honorable speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council [PLC]; honorable brother and sister members of the PLC; ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters: It is a pleasure and an honor to address you today while you are convening this important session of our elected PLC. [Arafat digresses from the written text] Every now and then they say elections.

We too have elections.

[Arafat returns to text]

Our elected PLC carried and continues to carry heavy burdens and historic responsibilities alongside the Palestine National Council. Our steadfast and patient Palestinian people are stubbornly and firmly crossing this interim phase, which has lasted for too long, between the occupation and independence.

[Arafat digresses from the written text]

We were supposed to declare independence in 1999, or have you forgotten this? [Arafat returns to the text] It is an interim phase between slavery and freedom. The destiny of all of us, our generation, and our people has been to suffer this much because our demand, objective, and dream is true freedom and full independence in the independent state of Palestine, with holy Jerusalem as its capital, whether they like it or not. Those who do not like it, they can go down to Sa’ib [Urayqat] and drink from the Dead Sea [Arafat laughs][a voice is heard from among the crowd saying “from the Gaza Sea”] No, it is more bitter there in the Dead Sea [Arafat continues to laugh].

Allow me dear ones, members of the PLC, to remind ourselves today, 15 May, of the anniversary of the Catastrophe [reference to the loss of Palestine in 1948] that afflicted our Palestinian people, who suffered and continue to suffer.

Yet, they are holding fast in the face of all these difficult circumstances and the historic attempts to erase them from the political and geographic map of the Middle East.

Ours are people of exceeding strength. In this land are a people of exceeding strength [part of Koranic verse]. They are defending their holy land and Christian and Islamic sanctities.

They are recording this heroic epic, which our heroic Palestinian people and their struggling forces are waging so as to win freedom and independence and so that our children and generations would live in peace and security in a free and independent homeland, away from occupation, settlement, oppression, assassinations, and arrests. Such practices are unprecedented in the contemporary international community.

Our people are the only people in the world now that are still living under occupation.

Peace has always been and will always remain our strategic option. We will not abandon the option of peace between the Israelis and us, because peace is a mutual interest for the Palestinian and Israeli peoples. All other options employed by the Israeli Government to destroy the option of peace, the peace of the brave, which I signed with my late partner, Rabin, who was assassinated by these extremist forces, have failed.

Despite all the murder, bombardment, displacement of people, and the destruction of infrastructure and our official, educational, health, social, security, and other institutions carried out by the occupation troops, the military solution has not and will not change anything in our determination to attain independence, sovereignty, and freedom. Nor will it change anything in our determination to realize the peace of the brave that was established in the Madrid Conference and the agreements signed to achieve a just, comprehensive, and lasting peace. This is especially the case after the recent Arab summit in Beirut endorsed the Saudi initiative of Saudi Crown Prince Abdallah, and after the recent meeting in Sharm al-Shaykh that grouped President Mubarak, His Royal Highness Crown Prince Abdallah Al Sa’ud, and President Bashar al-Asad.

We have extended, and continue to extend our hand toward the just peace, the peace of the brave; the peace that can achieve security and justice to the Palestinians and the Israelis, and to the Arab region, the Middle East, and to the entire world. This should be known to the entire world. This land is holy for the entire world and peace should be achieved for this land, the land that is holy to all people.

With all faith and responsibility, I can confirm to you today that the talks we held in Camp David were very difficult, critical, and sensitive. They covered all the important and basic issues. Despite the good, and extra, efforts exerted by President Clinton and his team, we did not reach an agreement over these basic issues. As you know, we continued afterwards at Sharm al-Shaykh. These talks were patronized by His Excellency President Mubarak. We also continued talks in Paris. The last session of these talks was attended by His Excellency President Chirac.

Progress was made at the Taba negotiations, as you all know. It is enough to go back to the news conference that followed Taba where the Palestinian side was represented by brother Abu-Ala [Ahmad Quray] and the Israeli side was represented by Ben-Ami. It clearly shows what we had reached. Every now and then they say that you have not availed yourselves of the opportunities that you have been given.

I am relating some events and facts so that certain people might not lead us here and there. I say this with insistence, firmness, and determination. Progress was made at the Taba talks and we were supposed to implement what was decided after the Israeli elections, as you all know. You lived and suffered with your people and Palestinian Authority because of what happened, before and after that, especially in view of the movements of the Israeli army and the plans it drew up, such as the Israeli Field of Thorns operation against our unarmed people. The required spark that caused the eruption was the storming of the Jerusalem holy mosque [by Ari’el Sharon] in a flagrant action which provoked the worshippers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

This provocative violation led to opening fire at the worshippers resulting in martyring and wounding many of our people.

Brother speaker, brother members. In confronting this unjust war of aggression against our people, beginning with the Field of Thorns and continuing with the 100-day battle, the Hell [Oranim], the Rolling, the Colors Journey, and finally to the Defensive Shield, our people in every town, village, and [refugee] camp remained steadfast in facing the occupation, closures, massacres, and aggression.

Our masses and National Authority have offered heavy sacrifices for about two years. About 20-21 months have passed [since the outbreak of the intifadah]. No city, camp, village, town, house, or even a hut have been spared from the Israeli military attacks with tanks, aircraft, and suffocating siege. Occupation roadblocks have been set up everywhere.

Bombs have hurt schoolchildren and mothers, and destroyed homes over the heads of their tenants.

History stands witness to what happened in Janin camp and Janin city. The Israel crime targeted our people in this heroic camp, as well as other camps, such as Balatah, Askar, Nur Shams, A’idah, Al-Fawwar, Al-Duhayshah, Al-Am’ari, and Qaddurah, in addition to Nabulus and old Nabulus. [Arafat digresses from the written text] As you know, brothers, Joseph, may peace be upon him, and his father and brothers lived near old Nabulus, from where they traveled to Egypt. Yet, they [Israelis] came and destroyed it. [Arafat returns to the text] They also destroyed the holiest churches and mosques there. [Arafat digresses from the text] In old Nabulus, our Samarian brothers live. We take pride in the presence of their representative among us here. [Arafat returns to the text] They also targeted Ramallah, Bethlehem, and the holy Church of Nativity, which is held sacred by both Christians and Muslims.

Surat Maryam [Koranic verse of Virgin Mary] is a special verse in our holy Koran. The Church of the Nativity witnessed the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ, peace be upon him. They also targeted Gaza; Jabaliya; Khan Yunus; Dayr al-Balah; Rafah and its camp, which was totally erased; Abasan; Bayt Hanun; Tulkarm; Qalqilyah; Hebron, whose inhabitants cannot enter it except with difficulty and with a permit as curfew is imposed there; and the presidential offices in the various areas and governorates. Total destruction was inflicted on them, in addition to the total destruction inflicted on the Gaza International Airport and the destruction of planes, buildings, ministries, radio and television; and division of the Gaza Strip into separate cantons.

To go from one place to another you need nine hours. Ask your brothers there, who can hear us now? How long does it take you to travel from Khan Yunus to Gaza?

Does it not take nine hours? Never mind. And do thou be patient, for thy patience is but from God; nor grieve over them; and distress not thyself because of their plots. [Koranic verse]

Brothers and sisters: The road to freedom, independence, and dignity has never been strewn with flowers, but with steadfastness, patience, perseverance, and the ability to confront the aggression and aggressors.

The plot against our people and homeland to deprive us of our freedom, independence, and state has not stopped. Its chapters are continuing one after another. Since the night of 29 March, we have been the targets of a comprehensive Israeli aggression, in which all types of weapons are used.

They include tanks, planes, missiles, and internationally banned weapons. We had no alternative to patience and steadfastness under this military siege of our cities, camps, the presidential headquarters in Ramallah, the holy Church of the Nativity, the Umar Bin-al-Khattab Mosque in Bethlehem. Despite the lifting of the siege on the presidential headquarters and the Church of the Nativity under the toughest of conditions, the Israeli Government continues its daily incursions and attacks on all areas, unconcerned about the growing international denunciation of its attacks and crimes. It went so far as to prevent the international inquiry commission from investigating the occupation army’s crime against our people in the Janin camp.

It also set impossible Israeli conditions for the convening of the international conference, which was called for by President Bush and which was supported by the international four-party committee. I salute President Bush, who called for establishing an independent Palestinian state [in a speech] at the UN General Assembly session, which we both attended. He was the first US President to say this at the UN General Assembly. I would like to remind you here that the agreement reached with the US and British envoys, who visited me under the siege, was that we should first begin by lifting the siege on the Church of the Nativity, a holy place for both Muslims and Christians. Regrettably, two incidents occurred the day the siege was supposed to be lifted. Sorry, Mr. Ahmad [Quray], for digressing. Had it not been for the efforts of the monks and those besieged, the fire could not have been extinguished after three and a half hours. Part of the Franciscan and Greek Orthodox quarters, including the part in which you used to visit me, were burned down and destroyed. That was the part where I slept at Christmas.

Brothers and sisters, I know that there are some observations about what was agreed upon. [Arafat digresses from the text] We hear all kinds of talk and we observe all kinds of one-upmanship. May God help us. [Arafat returns to the text]

It was agreed to lift the blockade and withdraw the occupation troops.

However, I say it in front of you: I assume full responsibility for everything. Do not blame Abu-Ala, Ahmad Abd-al-Rahman, Hanan [Ashrawi], or anybody else. Blame it on me. I am responsible for all that has happened, especially since what happened was in the form of US, European, Russian, and UN proposals and guarantees. You are aware of those critical and difficult circumstances, so I am not going into the details. I leave it to you to assess those developments sincerely, faithfully, and openly. [Arafat digresses from the written text] We fear nothing. I tell you that if there was any mistake, I would be responsible for it. No march anywhere in the world can be void of mistakes. Did not one of Adam’s children kill his brother? [Voice from the audience says “correct them”] We will therefore correct them. We will correct them. If you just gave me time, you would have heard this word. This should be done away from emotions and outside influences. Let us be faithful in dealing with what is facing our people and issues at all levels.

Brother speaker, sister and brother members: The Israeli aggression against our people is continuing and escalating as long as the occupation and settlements are imposed on our land and people, who are firmly and persistently clinging to their land. It suffices to look at Faris Awdah and other children at his age standing with Palestinian stones confronting the most sophisticated Israeli tank, the Merkava. These are the Palestinian people, the people of exceeding strength.

At this time, we badly need to reassess our plans, policies, and correct-so that you might not speak ahead of me-and amend our march toward national independence with complete honesty, sincerity, faith, and firmness. Be sure we shall test you with something of fear and hunger, some loss in goods, lives, and the fruits of your toil, but give glad tidings to those who patiently persevere-who say, when afflicted with calamity: “To Allah we belong, and to Him is our return.” [Koranic verse]

In this regard, we announced some time ago and we announce today our rejection of the [terrorist] operations targeting Israeli civilians as well as Palestinian civilians, as was the case in Janin, or rather in “Janingrad.” We no longer talk about Stalingrad, but “Janingrad.” Let the entire world hear this. We are talking here about something even uglier than Stalingrad, we are talking about “Janingrad.”

The Palestinian public opinion and the Arab public opinion have reached the conviction that these operations do not serve our goals, but incite many large sectors of the international community against us, although it was this community which created Israel and provided it with funds, weapons, protection, and so on and so forth. You know better than me. These operations are causing a controversy. I call on your esteemed Council to discuss this issue, which is controversial in our Palestinian and Arab arenas.

Let us remember the Truce of al-Hudaybiyah [between Prophet Muhammad and Mecca infidels in the year 628 AD]. Our Lord Ali [Bin-Abi Talib] refused to erase the word Prophet when the infidels insisted that the prophet be identified only by his name. Prophet Muhammad asked Ali to erase it and identify him only as Muhammad Bin-Abdallah. Ali refused. The prophet then asked where this word was in the document and he erased it himself. So I am only reminding you of these stories. [Addressing an unidentified individual] You should remind me.

Opposition is legitimate if it observes the rational limits and if it faces, with patience, wisdom, and forbearance everything that confronts us within the framework of the general direction, in which we take pride. I say this based on concern for the national and pan-Arab interest of our people and nation, and out of our keenness to strengthen world solidarity with your people and cause.

I call on your Council to patronize a comprehensive and thorough national dialogue to discuss all our political issues that top the national, pan-Arab, and international priorities. All forms of our national struggle must be strengthened and must focus on the need to achieve our people’s dream to establish the independent Palestinian state with Holy Jerusalem as its capital on our land that was occupied in 1967. This was decided by our Palestinian National Council (PNC) when it declared independence and the independent state in Algiers in 1988.

Brother speaker of the Legislative Council, sisters and brothers: Following this Israeli aggression, our domestic situation and political system require a comprehensive review. There is no other way. We must review our situation. We must review what is correct and what is wrong in all aspects of our national life. You know that we set our political system on the basis of democracy and free elections, which were supervised by leaders from all over the world. Was this not the case? We established security agencies and national security and police services as part of a pre-concept that the interim phase cited in the Oslo accords would end in 1999. The political, administrative, and security structure of our state would then be reconsidered. However, matters went in a completely different direction after the Israeli Government’s failure to respect or implement agreements. Since then, it has embarked on this unjust war against us, against our land, against our people, and against our Christian and Islamic holy places. Allow me, sisters and brothers, to ask you very sincerely and responsibly to quickly prepare for elections and to implement what is possible in this regard. [applause]

[Arafat then digresses from written text] I do not want Sa’ib [Urayqat] to come and tell me they should take place tomorrow.

Be patient, Sa’ib. [Arafat laughs]

Free elections should be adopted as a basic method to choose leaders to the national society bodies or the organizations, trade unions, and popular institutions, which are basic tools in building the civic society. [applause]

The principle of separation among the judicial, legislative, and executive branches of power should be observed. [applause] National unity [Arafat reads preceding two words three times] and human rights should be maintained. Out of my experience in administration and authority, I call for reconsidering all of our administrative and ministerial formations as well as the security agencies after deficiencies have emerged here and there. These cannot be concealed from the people, who are suffering under the Israeli occupation. We should not let these people endure more suffering. [applause]

We all have made efforts in the field of work and construction. We should not forget that we took land in which everything was destroyed. We lived on this land with all pride, firmness, and dignity. The foe admitted this before the friend. The international institutions, including the World Bank and the IMF, also admitted this.

We have all exerted efforts in building and working. We might have been wrong some times and right during other occasions. We might have been wrong or right in pursuing this or that responsibility. But, we have preserved the trust and national goals, led by the goal of gaining independence and freedom, and establishing the Palestinian state with holy Jerusalem as its capital.

And to enter your temple as they had entered it before. And to enter your temple as they had entered it before. Never does Allah fail from His promise. Never does Allah fail from His promise. [Koranic verses]

Of course brothers, by this we mean all the 1967-occupied Palestinian and Arab territories as outlined in the Madrid Conference, which we, the entire world, and all Arab forces attended. As you know, we barely attended this conference with them. However, we regained this firm land to the people of the mighty.

Brother PLC Speaker; sisters and brothers:

This holy land is a trust in our care. We will remain faithful to the blood of our martyrs and to our prisoners and wounded. May God aid them and grant them patience.

Now as we face this stifling siege, continuous aggression, and these crucial, historical, and hard circumstances, the goal and the dream draw closer in spite of all suffering, sacrifices, and pains. I insist on the drafting of a new, complete formula for our national condition and for the Authority and its administrations, ministries, and security agencies to rebuild them on stronger, firmer, and more correct foundations in a manner that would enable us to achieve our national ambition of gaining independence and freedom and establishing the independent Palestinian state. Brothers and sisters: This is the hour for work and building, for change and reform in spite of all attempts to hinder the national reconstruction process.

[Arafat digresses from written text]

As you see, we can barely convene the cabinet. We cannot convene the Legislative Council. As you can see, we are meeting via television screens. I proudly say that we will not only convene via television, but also via telephone or fax. No one can stop us.

[Repeating earlier statement]

Brothers… This is the hour for work and building, for change and reform in spite of all attempts to hinder the national reconstruction process and the establishment of our independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.

Our elected Palestinian Legislative Council should turn into a workshop to review the march and its positive and negative elements in order to rebuild our political system on firmer foundations of democracy, supremacy of law, and independence of the judiciary. This would also enable us to reconstruct our various economic and financial establishments and to reconstruct our infrastructure to provide a strong foundation for our people on the path toward independence and freedom.

In the name of God the merciful the compassionate: He said: “O my people! See ye whether I have a clear sign from my Lord, and he hath given me sustenance pure and good as from himself? I wish not, in opposition to you, to do that which I forbid you to do. I only desire you betterment to the best of my power;

And my success, my task can only come from Allah. In Him I trust, And unto Him I return. [Koranic verse].

Glory to God in the highest, peace on earth, and goodwill to all men.

I greet you. Peace, God’s mercy, and blessings on you. Thank you for bearing with me.

Removing the PLO Occupation of Bethlehem

Bethlehem, Residents of this biblical city are expressing relief at the exile to Cyprus last week of 13 hard-core Palestinian militants, who they said had imposed a two-year reign of terror that included rape, extortion and executions.

Exiled Palestinian militants ran two-year reign of terror

The 13 sent to Cyprus, as well as 26 others sent to the Gaza Strip, had taken shelter in the Church of the Nativity, triggering a 39-day siege that ended Friday.

Palestinians who live near the church described the group as a criminal gang that preyed especially on Palestinian Christians, demanding “protection money” from the main businesses, which make and sell religious artifacts.

According to Bethlehem residents, one of the group’s top leaders, Jihad Ja’ara, 29, traveled around town with an M-16 rifle, terrorizing the community.

“Finally the Christians can breathe freely,” said Helen, 50, a Christian mother of four. “We are so delighted that these criminals who have intimidated us for such a long time are now going away.”

Others feared new gunmen will capitalize on the group’s disappearance and the pullout of Israeli troops.

“Will new gangs come in?” asked Samer, 33, from the Christian suburb of Beit Jala in Bethlehem. “The gunmen will start taking revenge on the weak, desperate people.”

Residents also said that Mr. Ja’ara and another top leader, Ibrahim Abayat, took nine Muslims whom they suspected of collaborating with Israel into an apartment near Manger Square and fatally shot them.

The executions took place shortly before the April 2 gunbattle between Israeli troops and Palestinian fighters that sent more than 200 Palestinians fleeing into the church, where they remained for 39 days.

Abayat, in a phone interview from inside the church while the siege was under way, said he was personally responsible for the killings.

He said there was no need for a trial because “it was a well-known fact that these people were linked to Israel.”

Abayat and Mr. Ja’ara are now at a seaside hotel in Cyprus, waiting to be moved to an as-yet-unnamed European country, where many expect them to be set free.

The gang has said it is part of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a militia linked to Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat that has claimed responsibility for several recent suicide bombings in Israel.

Zuhair Hamdan, founder of the Movement for Coexistence in Jerusalem, was sitting on a chair outside his corner shop near Bethlehem in November when an official Palestinian Authority car drew up with a squeal of brakes.

From the back window a gunman, who Mr. Hamdan says was a member of the gang, emptied 12 bullets from a M-16 rifle, hitting him five times in the abdomen, legs and neck.

Mr. Hamdan was so close to death in the hospital that he now jokes, “They took my body to the cemetery but the cemetery rejected me.”

Mr. Hamdan said seven members of the gang were involved. Five of the seven assailants have since died, at least one of them fatally shot by Israel during the recent church siege, he said.

“The remaining two gunmen are being kicked out of Bethlehem, but wherever they end up, someone will get to them and make them pay for all the awful things they’ve done,” he said.

The gang apparently used its ready access to guns and close ties with Mr. Arafat’s Palestinian security forces to extort money, run guns, smuggle drugs and even demand that young women separate from their husbands.

After one woman was reportedly raped by a gang member, the perpetrator was put in jail, but only briefly. His comrades reportedly forced the jailers to let him go.

The gang’s hostility toward Christians extended to a 17-year-old altar boy fatally shot during an Israeli incursion in October.

A small stone monument the family erected in Johnny Talgieh’s memory on the spot in Manger Square where he died was kicked and spat on by gang members, then toppled with ropes and cables and left smashed on the ground.

“They did not want to recognize that a Christian could be considered a [martyr],” said a family member, “even though having that statue there would have given the Palestinian cause a huge propaganda boost.

“They hate us Christians more than they love Palestine.”

Even during the recent siege, gang members who had not fled into the church continued to demand their regular 10 shekels (about $2) from each taxi driver going in and out of a parking lot close to the compound.

One who refused, saying he had no cash, was reportedly beaten up last month.

The gang apparently operated under the full protection of Mr. Arafat’s Fatah organization and Tanzim, its military wing.

During the 19-month uprising, they have often fired into the nearby Israeli suburb of Gilo from church grounds and the homes of Palestinian Christians in Beit Jala.

When Palestinian gunmen would show up at the door, Christian families often had no choice but to let their homes be used as sniper posts and face the consequences of Israeli retaliation.

This piece ran in the Washington Times on May 14, 2002
www.washtimes.com/world/20020513-2162940.htm

Foreign Ministry Acts Contrary to Government Decisions

The next IDF chief of staff, Maj. Gen. Moshe (Bugi) Yaalon, criticized the Foreign Ministry, claiming: “The Foreign Ministry acts contrary to government decisions.”

Recently, Yaalon told IDF officers that the Foreign Ministry was acting against government decisions, since the government had determined that Arafat was irrelevant, and despite that, the ministry continues, in its activities throughout the world, to treat him as the legitimate chairman of the Palestinian Authority. A few days ago, Minister Peres instructed members of the Foreign Ministry to criticize terror, but not Arafat himself.

This is not the first time that Yaalon has criticized the Foreign Ministry and its head, Shimon Peres. About a year ago severe criticism against Peres was quoted in the name of “senior IDF officers,” following which the two held a meeting of reconciliation.

Other generals in the General Staff joined in the criticism and claimed recently: “The IDF is acting according to government decisions and presenting Arafat as a terrorist, while the Foreign Ministry is doing exactly the opposite. The result is that the State of Israel is speaking in two different voices, and Israeli public relations have been badly harmed.” Recently, the IDF upper echelons criticized the Foreign Ministry’s consent to the UN fact-finding team into events in the Jenin refugee camp, which for now has been cancelled. Senior military sources said that Peres “treated the subject of the fact-finding team with the greatest neglect and could have brought terrible trouble on the IDF.”

Foreign Ministry sources expressed amazement last night at the fact that the deputy chief of staff believes that his job is to manage Israel’s diplomatic establishment. “He has enough to do in the military, and it is better that he concentrate on that. If the chief of staff or his deputy have any complaints, better that they raise them at the accepted forums and not resort to mudslinging in the media,” the sources said. [… ]

A senior official in the Foreign Ministry added: “It is a shame that Bugi Yaalon is starting his career on the wrong foot and sticking his nose into political matters.”

This article ran in Yedioth Ahronoth on May 14, 2002

Will the Media Report Their Police Record?

Here are the police profiles of 13 Palestinian terrorists who were released from the Church of the Nativity who are now awaiting a “welcome” in host countries. It will be instructive to know if the mainstream news media will carry a profile of all or any of these following men:

1. Ibrahim Moussa Salem Abayat (alias Abu Jalif)

Abayat was born in 1973, and is a resident of the city of Bethlehem. He is head of the Fatah Tanzim terrorist organization in the city. After the death of Atef Abayat, Ibrahim took over as the Bethlehem commander of the Tanzim. Abayat also orchestrated and participated in the shooting and mortar attacks on the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo and on the Bethlehem bypass roads.

Ibrahim Abayat was also involved in the following murderous terrorist attacks:

  • 20 September 2001 – A shooting attack on an Israeli vehicle near Tekoa, in which Sarit Amrani was murdered.
  • 16 July 2001 – The detonation of an explosive charge on the Beit Safafa -Talpiot bridge inside Jerusalem.
  • 15 January 2002 – The abduction and murder of Avi Boaz, a US citizen residing in Israel. Boaz was stopped at a Palestinian roadblock near Beit Sahour. There he was abducted by Abayat’s operatives, who took him to Bethlehem, and upon Abayat’s instructions, shot him to death.
  • 18 February 2002 – The detonation of a car bomb at the Zaim checkpoint, resulting in the death of an Israeli policeman.
  • 25 February 2002 – A shooting attack at an Israeli vehicle close to the Tekoa junction. Avraham Fisch and Aharon Gorov of Nokdim were killed in the attack, and Tamar Lipschitz, in an advanced stage of pregnancy, was wounded in the attack.
  • 2 March 2002 – A shooting attack at a vehicle south of Jerusalem, in which dental technician, Devorah Friedman, mother of four, was murdered.
  • June 14, 2002 – Involvement in the planning and execution of the terrorist murder of Israeli intelligence officer, Yehuda Edri.

2. Ibrahim Mohammed Salem Abayat

Abayat born in 1961, and a resident of Bethlehem. Abayat is an operative of the Hamas organization, brother of Hussein Abayat – senior Fatah terrorist operative who was killed in action in November 2000.

Abayat provided accommodation to both Salamah and Mouhi Adin Sharif – a senior bomb ‘engineer’ – in his Bethlehem apartment. Abayat enabled Salamah and Sharif to stay in his Bethlehem apartment for more than a week, and gave them financial assistance. In 2000, during the questioning of Salem Jubran, it emerged that he gave weapons training to Hamas operatives in 1996. Abayat financed terrorist shootings, and planned terrorist attacks against civilians in Jerusalem, providing both economic and ideological support for these attacks. Abayat was also personally involved in the shooting attacks on the Jerusalem neighbourhood of Gilo and the IDF in Bethlehem.

3. Jihad Youssef Khalil Jaara

Jaara, born in Al-Aroub in 1971 and resides in Bethlehem. He is an operative both in the Hamas and Fatah Tanzim. Jaara carried out a number of attacks, and was responsible for a number of terrorist killings.

Jaara was involved in a shooting attacks in the Jericho area during the recent Palestinian campaign of violence. These attacks included the shooting near Nahal Elisha on 1 November 2000, in which IDF officer Amir Zohar was killed. In addition, he carried out a shooting attack on 8 December 2000 against a bus on the Jericho bypass road, resulting in the death of IDF soldier Tal Gordon and the crippling of an Israeli woman.

  • On 15 January 2002, Jaara was also involved in the terrorist killing of Avi Boaz, in Beit Jalla.
  • On 26 March 2002, Jaara dispatched a suicide bomber to carry out an attack, but his car exploded, next to the Malha shopping mall.
  • On 30 March 2002, Jaara was interviewed on the BBC, following the suicide bombing attempt. During the interview, he spoke about his support for suicide bombings, the means with which operatives obtain weapons, and he led the reporter to the bomb-maker behind the production of explosives. During the interview, Jaara was photographed while carrying out shooting attacks on the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo.

4. Abdullah Daoud Mohammed Abdullah Khader

Daoud, born in 1962, originally from the Balata refugee camp, in Nablus, resides in Bethlehem, and serves as the Head of the Palestinian Authority’s General Intelligence apparatus in the city. He had previously served as the Head of the General Intelligence apparatus in Tulkarm and Kalkilya. Daoud provided assistance and instructions to senior Fatah Tanzim operatives, such as Raed Karmi – a senior Tanzim operative responsible for fatal terrorist attacks in the Samaria region, Mohammed Naafa – a Tanzim terrorist operative and Abbas Alsaid – a Hamas terrorist operative.

Daoud provided courses and training to Tanzim operatives, and provided weapons and ammunition to Tanzim operatives. He encouraged them to carry out attacks, and chided them for not doing enough for the Palestinian struggle. He recruited operatives, and encouraged them to carry out attacks.

Daoud was personally responsible for operating a terrorist cell, for the execution of shooting attacks and the murder of PLO dissidents. Daoud was also involved along with others in the production of high explosives, for the use of Tanzim operatives. He also instructed his operatives in the preparation of bombs and high explosives.

He coordinated the transfer of weapons from one town to another, for the use of Tanzim operatives.

He took part in directing the 25 February 2002 shooting attack at the Tekoa junction. In that attack, two men were murdered, and a pregnant woman was severely wounded.

5. Mohammed Said Atallah Salem

Salem was born in 1979, and a resident of Dehaishe refugee camp Salem is a senior operative in the Fatah Tanzim terrorist infrastructure of Ahmad Magharbi, was directly involved in the following attacks

  • 22 January 2002 – The dispatch of a suicide bomber to the Talpiot neighborhood in Jerusalem. The terrorist abandoned the explosive charge and fled back to the Dehaishe refugee camp.
  • 18 February 2002 – The detonation of a car bomb by a suicide bomber on the Maale Adumim road, close to the Zaim checkpoint. A policeman was killed in the attack.
  • 2 March 2002 – The suicide bombing in the Beit Yisrael neighborhood of Jerusalem. As a result of the attack, 11 Israelis were killed, among them 4 children, and dozens more were wounded.
  • 29 March 2002 – The suicide bombing of a supermarket in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Kiryat Yovel. An Israeli security guard and a teenage Israeli girl were killed in the attack, and many were wounded.

6. Mohammed Fouzi Mohammed Muhaneh

Muhaneh, born in 1980, originally from El Aroub and now lives and operates in Bethlehem. Muhaneh member of the Special Forces of the General Intelligence apparatus, under the command of Tawfik Tirawi. He was trained in security by the US. Muhaneh learned how to prepare explosive charges, and was given instructions in the recruitment of terrorist cells for the execution of attacks. Upon his return to Bethlehem, he recruited a terrorist cell in El Aroub together with Omer Hajara who had also participated with Muhaneh in the course in the US, and was also recruited for terrorist activity in Gaza (an explosives lab was found in Hajara’s house, and he is now in Israeli detention).

Muhaneh has been involved in numerous attempts to carry out terrorist attacks in the Bethlehem area, which have included shooting and mortar attacks at military and civilian targets alike.

Muhaneh was a member of a Tanzim terrorist cell operating under the command of Hussein Abayat. Their operations included shooting and mortar attacks at the Gilo neighborhood in Jerusalem. Following the death of Hussein Abayat, Muhaneh took over the command of some of the Tanzim operatives.

Muhaneh provided members of his terrorist cell with personal training and instruction in the use of firearms, and taught them how to produce and use pipe bomb attacks.

7. Rami Kamel Eid Kamel

Kamel, a resident of Bethlehem, was born in 1980 and is an active armed Tanzim was one of the primary terrorists behind the shooting attacks and mortar fire directed against civilian residents of the southern Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo.

The following are a few examples:

  • Kamel was a member of Atef Abayat’s terrorist cell which carried out systematic sniper and mortar attacks against Gilo as well as shooting attacks against Israeli civilian and military vehicles on the Bethlehem bypass roads. He added that Kamel took part in the murder of an IDF truck driver. Sgt. Max Hazan, on 2 October 2000, at point blank range.
  • Kamel was personally involved in the 11 February 2001 shooting attack against an Israeli civilian vehicle south of Gilo in which Rosh Tzurim resident Tzachi Sasson was murdered.

8. Aziz Khalil Mohammed el Abayat

Aziz Abayat, born in 1971, a former pharmacology student in al Najah University in Nablus now working Bethlehem’s Hussein Hospital, is a Hamas armed operative. As a pharmacist, he was able to purchase chemical compounds used in the manufacture of high explosives. Aziz took part in the dispatch of the suicide bombers Taleb Hermes and Ahmed Abedah, who detonated themselves against an IDF roadblock which they encountered on their way to carry out a synchronized high explosive suicide attack in Jerusalem. Aziz was responsible for the activities of all Hamas armed operatives in the Bethlehem area.

9. Mamdoukh Akhsan Mohammed Wardiyan

Wardiyan, born in 1979, is an armed operative of the Hamas. He was imprisoned until June 2001, for recruiting on behalf of the Hamas and the Koutleh Islamic Front, being a member of a Hamas terrorist cell, and carrying out street violence. After Arafat released him from prison, he returned to his Hamas terrorist activities, becoming a senior armed member of the Hamas’ terrorist apparatus. Wardiyan took part in a number of shooting attacks against Israelis and planted explosive devices in the Bethlehem area.

Wardiyan was the close aide of Aziz Abayat and Bassem Hamoud, an armed operative who was injured during the standoff at the Nativity Church, and subsequently hospitalized.

The fact that Wardiyan returned to terrorist activities upon his release from prison, and his immediate integration into the senior Hamas field leadership, demonstrates that it can be assumed that he will strive to carry out terrorist activities whenever conditions permit. Due to the removal of the senior Hamas leadership as a result of Operation Defensive Shield, and his stature in the organization, Wardiyan, together with Aziz Abayat, are liable to become the next leaders of the Hamas’ terrorist apparatus in Bethlehem.

10. Khaled Mohammed Abd el Hamid Abu Najimeh

Abu Najimeh, born in 1968, is a resident of the Dehaisheh refugee camp. He was a member of both a terrorist cell of the General Security Special Forces, and a Tanzim/Fatah cell responsible for a number of fatal terrorist attacks originating in Bethlehem – among them, the attack of a woman suicide bomber against a supermarket in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Kiryat Yovel, the dispatch of two suicide bombers to attack the Maccabia Games (who detonated before reaching their objective), and other fatal attacks. The cell was led by Yehieh Daghamseh, the master bomb maker of the Bethlehem area. In addition to the aforementioned attacks, Abu Najimeh was also responsible for the planting of explosive charges in the Bethlehem area, intended for use against IDF forces.

11. Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed al Hemamreh

Ahmed Hemamreh, born in 1971, is a Tanzim terrorist operative.

Tried to engineer a suicide bomb in a large Jerusalem shopping center during the course of the Passover holiday. The explosion was planned for the morning hours, when the mall was to have been filled with children on vacation.

12. Khalil Mohammed Abdullah Nawareh

Nawareh, born in 1978, resident of Bethlehem, is a Tanzim terrorist operative. He is an aide to Ibrahim Abayat, the head of the Tanzim in Bethlehem, and has taken part in a number of terrorist attacks, including the murder, on 11 February 2001, of an Israeli civilian, Tzachi Sasson, was murdered.

13. Annan Mohammed Hamis Tanjeh

Tanjeh, born in 1978, is a resident of the Inatrah neighborhood in Bethlehem.

He is a known Tanzim operative, and member of the Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades Tanja received terrorist directives from Ibrahim Abayat and Riyadh al Amour, ranking Tanzim commanders in Bethlehem who are responsible for the murder of Israeli citizens. Tanja carried out shooting attacks against the Tunnel Route, the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo, and IDF forces around Bethlehem.

How the Americans for Peace Now Provided Finance for Barak’s Election Campaign in 1999

[The “Americans for Peace Now” in the US and “Peace Now” in Israel are registered as non-profit organizations, a legal ststus in both countries which would forbid either organization from providing funds for a political party. That ststus did not prevent both organizations from doing just that in 1999]

Yossi Sarid himself and Peace Now naturally joined forces with Ehud Barak, and became an integral part of his election campaign in 1999.

Only after he was elected did the close connection between Peace Now and Barak’s election headquarters become known, in the context of the nonprofit organizations affair.

Three central Peace Now figures worked very closely with Barak – Janet Aviad and Amiram Goldblum, as the heads of two of the nonprofit groups, and Yuli Tamir, who would later become Minister Yuli Tamir. Peace Now took an active role and was directly involved in Barak’s second round headquarters in the final month before the elections. The headquarters, which was compartmentalized from everyone else, was managed by Haim Mandel Shaked.

Someone there came up with the idea of running a secret advertising campaign for Barak, using the figure of the late Yitzhak Rabin.

But there was a problem how to fund such a campaign, which could not be directly associated with Barak’s election campaign. Its memorable slogan was “Following in his footsteps.” It was planned as a national poster campaign, which was set in motion with the help of Noar Meretz (Meretz’s youth division) and volunteers from the kibbutzim, but also using Moshe Nur’s sign system.

Musi Raz, then the head of Peace Now and now a Knesset member for Meretz, suggested that Haim Mandel Shaked solve the funding problem by raising funds from “American Friends of Peace Now”.

Everything remained confidential because Peace Now was prohibited from any involvement in party politics. Immediatel afterwards, Haim Mandel Shaked told the poster campaign operations people, “We have the funding. Ask Musi Raz.” “The amount was about $100,000,” Musi Raz confirmed to me. A source in Barak’s 1999 election headquarters says, “The campaign funded by Peace Now was Ehud Barak’s campaign.”

Contact was made with Moshe Nur’s staff on a purely commercial basis. One of them told me this week, “In my opinion, what you have is dynamite. The source of the money is known. The money came from a contribution from the United States. It was a completely circular deal. The people we were in contact with were Musi Raz and his assistant.”

The posters themselves were done by the Gal advertising firm and the checks were made out to “DealTov.” Photographer Gadi Dagon was paid about $5,000 for the rights to his photograph of Yitzhak Rabin.

At the offices of Meretz on Homa Umigdal Street in Tel Aviv, they were very proud of the project, a large part of which was handed over to Meretz’s youth division to carry out. They spoke quietly and proudly of “Peace Now’s trick.” Two of their main activists, artist Avital Geva and Hemi Sal, both from Kibbutz Ein-Shemer, were responsible for hanging the huge poster with Rabin’s picture on the gigantic buildings of the Granot factory at the Gan-Shmuel junction.

There was nothing on the posters to identify who was behind them, neither One Israel (remember them?) nor Peace Now. The reason was that Peace Now is registered in Israel as a nonprofit organization which does not participate in party politics, making it possible for it to raise funds in the United States, for tax purposes. The question is whether the use of Peace Now funds raised in the United States to participate in the funding of an election campaign in Israel is not in violation of American law.

“I see nothing illegal in the campaign,” says Musi Raz. “What is wrong with Peace Now running a campaign with a picture of Yitzhak Rabin?”

This piece ran in Makor Rishon on May 10, 2002

The US State Department Fails to Interpret Arafat’s Endorsement of Murder

Last week IMRA [Independent Media Review and Analyis] noted that a proper understanding of call by Chairman Yasser Arafat that earned US President Bush’s praise is that the Palestinians should continue killing soldiers and Israelis residing beyond the Green Line.

IMRA brought this to the attention of Paul Patin Press Attache – U.S. Embassy Tel Aviv.

In the response below, Mr. Patin provides a response from Washington that Arafat did not call for continued attacks beyond the Green Line.

This morning, Ahmad Abdul Rahman, Cabinet Secretary of the Palestinian Authority clarified the position of the PA regarding attacks, explaining that “activities are to be limited to the areas of 1967” without any limitation or qualification attached to this activity. His words, first broadcast in Arabic and then translated into Hebrew, were broadcast this morning on Israel Radio by Arab Affair Correspondent Avi Yissakharov.

Within hours an Israeli was murdered by his Palestinain employee in the Gaza Strip.

One can only hope that one day the State Department will abandon its “say it ain’t so” approach to the Palestinian Authority – a stance they have taken from the very start of Oslo when they regularly issued compliance reports to the U.S. Senate that can be best described as barefaced lies that the Palestinians were completely complying with Oslo.

The material below appears in reverse chronological order:

Response from Paul Patin Press Attache – U.S. Embassy Tel Aviv

From: “Patin, Paul”
To:
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:46 a.m.
Subject: FW: Arafat calls to stop attacks on civilians but keep fighting army and Israelis beyond the Green Line

Good morning Dr. Lerner, I have checked with Washington about this matter. Our position is that we note the recent steps taken by Chairman Arafat following the heinous terrorist bombing on Tuesday that left 15 Israelis dead, including the arrest of 14 Hamas operatives in Gaza, his condemnation of the attack, and his instructions to confront and prevent terrorist actions against Israelis. These are steps in the right direction – steps which the President clearly welcomed the day before yesterday – and Chairman Arafat must show leadership by continuing to signal clearly to his people that terror and violence cannot help the Palestinians achieve their national aspirations, and move decisively to confront terror and violence.

We do not subscribe to the interpretation that Chairman Arafat was, in the translation that you forwarded to me yesterday, actually calling on Palestinians to attack Israeli settlers and soldiers in the occupied territories or the West Bank or Judea and Samaria or whatever term you prefer. If we did believe that Chairman Arafat were calling on Palestinians to attack Israelis, then we would condemn it. Our position is that Chairman Arafat has not done enough to confront terror and violence, and that he must exercise leadership and do so – oppose and confront all violence, that is.

I hope this helps.

Paul Patin


Dr. Lerner, Having read this, and before having sent it to Washington, one thought does occur to me, which I suspect will occur to people in Washington as well – The IMRA commentary says “according to the Palestinians… ” which Palestinians? All Palestinians? Is this official PA policy? How and where is this enshrined? We know that some Palestinians feel this way, but that’s not the same as saying that Arafat is calling on Palestinian security forces to attack any Israelis east of the green line. That is one interpretation. In any case, I will point this out to Washington and solicit a response. Sincerely,

Paul Patin Press Attache
U.S. Embassy Tel Aviv


Message to Paul Patin Press Attache U.S. Embassy Tel Aviv from IMRA

Original Message—– From: imra@netvision.net.il[mailto:imra@netvision.net.il]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:39 p.m.
To: Patin, Paul
Subject: Arafat calls to stop attacks on civilians but keep fighting army and Israelis beyond the Green Line

Dear Mr. Paten –

Further to our telephone conversation.

Look forward to your comments to this item.

Best regards, Dr. Aaron Lerner – IMRA


Text: Arafat calls to stop attacks on civilians but keep fighting army and Israelis beyond the Green Line

[IMRA: The following is the text of the declaration by Yasser Arafat that US President George Bush said he read and praised. It should be noted that under Oslo Yasser Arafat solemnly committed the Palestinian People not to use violence. There is no “loophole” for killing soldiers or Israelis beyond the Green Line.

Unfortunately, it would appear that President Bush, by his praise, gives a green light to the Palestinians to continue murdering Israeli security forces as well as Israeli civilians beyond the 1967 line. According to the Palestinians, the very presence of Israelis beyond the Green Line (including inside the Old City of Jerusalem) constitutes “aggression”, so this statement, that Mr. Bush finds so promising, is actually a call to arms against even the Jews praying at the Western Wall.]

President Arafat: Palestinian Commitment to Fighting Terrorism Unwavering http://www.palestine-pmc.com/statments/2002/may/stat-8a-5-02.html I call on and request the important deployment of an international force to help us put an end to the aggression, help us, and impose peace May 8, 2002 Palestine Media Center-PMC

President Yasser Arafat issued the following statement today, condemning the terrorist attack against Israeli civilians, which took place last night.

Below is a transcript of the statement’s translated version:

As President of the Palestine Liberation and the Palestine National Authority, I reiterate my commitment to and sharing with the United States of American and the international community in their fight against terrorism. I have issued my orders to the Palestinian security forces to confront and obstruct any terrorist act against Israeli civilians from any Palestinian party while concurrently and in parallel, [I have instructed them] to confront any aggression against Palestinian civilians by the Israeli army and settlers, which we completely condemn [as well].

I call on the United States and President Bush as well as the international community to provide for the needed protection and support to the Palestinian security forces, whose infrastructure was destroyed by the Israeli occupation, so that they can carry out their duties and execute the orders issued to them to definitely eliminate any attempt to carry out a terrorist attack against Israeli and Palestinian civilians as a political means to reach the goals defined for it. With our commitment to the war against terrorism, I call on and request the important deployment of an international force to help us put an end to the aggression, help us, and impose peace.

Recapping: How the Media Made a Massacre in Jenin

[Thanks to IMRA for Noting and Distributing this Article.]
Despite flimsy evidence British papers jumped the gun to apportion blame when a West Bank refugee camp was attacked, says Sharon Sadeh. As a result, the reputation of the press has been damaged

The Guardian
Monday May 6, 2002

Reporting from a battlefield has always been a risky, uncertain and frustrating business, all the more so when the dominant military forces are hostile and often non-cooperative. And yet, skimming through the pages of the British and US mainstream papers over the past month might leave even the least inquisitive reader baffled: how couldreputable correspondents produce such different accounts of the Israeli assault on the refugee camp in the West Bank town of Jenin?

The battle of Jenin was indisputably fierce and bloody. But while the British papers, almost unanimously, presented it from the outset as a “massacre” or at least as an intentional “war crime” of the worst kind, the US and Israeli papers – Ha’aretz included – were far more reserved and cautious, saying that there was no evidence to back such claims. The left-liberal press in Britain thought differently. The Independent, the Guardian and the Times, in particular, were quick to denounce Israel and made sensational accusations based on thin evidence, fitting a widely held stereotype of a defiant, brutal and don’t-give-a-damn Israel.

Consider, for instance, the following reports, which appeared on April 16. Under the headline “Amid the ruins, the grisly evidence of a war crime”, the Independent’s Phil Reeves wrote: “A monstrous war crime that Israel has tried to cover up for a fortnight has finally been exposed.” Reeves, like his Times and Telegraph colleagues, all quote the same lone individual, Kamal Anis, who said that he “saw the Israeli soldiers pile 30 bodies beneath a half-wrecked house. When the pile was complete, they bulldozed the building, bringing its ruins down on the corpses. Then they flattened the area with a tank.” The verdict of Times correspondent, Janine di Giovanni, was no less harsh: “Rarely in more than a decade of war reporting… have I seen such deliberate destruction, such disrespect for human life.” This was followed by an emotive leader in the Guardian, on April 17, which compared the effects of the Israeli operation in Jenin to September 11.

Cotrast that to the descriptions in US and Israeli papers of the same events. The New York Times said: “Since the Israeli assault on Jenin began… aid groups have complained that Israeli soldiers have blocked ambulances and prevented aid from reaching the camp… Saed Dabayeh, who said he stayed in the camp through the fighting, led a group of reporters to a pile of rubble where he said he watched from his bedroom window as Israeli soldiers buried 10 bodies… The Palestinian accounts could not be verified.”

The Washington Post was even less equivocal: “Interviews with residents inside the camp and international aid workers who were allowed here for the first time today indicated that no evidence has surfaced to support allegations by Palestinian groups and aid organisations of large-scale massacres or executions by Israeli troops.”

A week later, the picture became clearer. In the absence of credible evidence to substantiate insinuations of cold-blooded “massacre” or “summary executions”, the British press changed its tone slightly. Many of the papers carried highly detailed accounts of events in Jenin, which discounted Palestinian claims that a massacre had taken place. Nonetheless, these same accounts were at pains to argue that lesser Israeli “war crimes” had indeed occurred, ranging from denial of medical care to Palestinian wounded to indiscriminate and wanton destruction of houses and property. This charge was often repeated in leading articles, especially in the Independent and the Guardian.

In fairness, Israel’s own blunders have contributed to the initial damning i mpression of events in Jenin. Statements by the foreign minister, Shimon Peres, that the Palestinians might present the Jenin battle as a massacre, and that of the IDF spokesmen, to the effect that “hundreds” of Palestinians were killed – both statements were later hastily retracted – fuelled confusion and suspicion. These errors were compounded by blocking journalists and aid agencies from entering the camp, which led to another charge, also widely reported, of an alleged cover-up by the Israeli forces.

But does all this justify the overall line and tone of coverage? Pictures of the devastation in Jenin commanded substantial space and were accompanied by emotional descriptions taken from survivors, without a serious attempt to cross-examine their claims, and often without even recording the Israeli version of events (which was meticulously documented throughout the operation).

In line with the prevalent tradition, the liberal British press has made an extensive and creative use of figurative language in its reports, which betrayed both bias and an attempt to elicit emotional response from the readers which could be translated into increased sales circulation.

In British broadsheets, the style of reporting is such that the distinction between commentary and news reporting is blurred. More often than not, this comes at the expense of accuracy, depth and perspective. Israel – which perceives the liberal European press as manifestly hostile and systematically biased – is entitled to be concerned about the effects of this approach, but it should also worry the UK audience. British reporters are entitled to form their own opinion on Israeli policies, but it cannot be based on anything but facts.

Selective use of details or information and occasional reliance on unsubstantiated accounts inflict considerable damage on the reputation of the entire British press, and more importantly, do a disservice to its readers. The US media, especially the press, were wilfully oblivious, prior to the September 11 attacks, to the issues which might have captured more accurately and profoundly the realities regarding the Middle East and the Muslim world, and the appropriate way of approaching and handling them. Are the British media in a similar state of self-denial?

This ran in Ha’aretz on May 11, 2002

Saudi Crown Prince Clarifies That His Plan Means Unilateral Withdrawal and The “Right of Return”

[At a time when the media continues to publicize the “peace” initiative of the Saudi Arabian Crown Prince, the Crown Prince continues to make it clear that the unlateral withdrawal of Israel to the 1949-1967 armistice lines and the “right of return” for all Arab refugees to be allowed to return to their non-existant homes from 1948 remain the preconditions for the Saudi Arabian plan to suceed. How many people know this?? d.b.]

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Abdullah said in an interview published Saturday that Israel must withdraw from all Arab territories captured in the 1967 Six-Day War, including East Jerusalem, as the price for real peace with the Arab world. Abdullah, speaking to Asharq al-Awsat newspaper, added that Israel would have to be open to discussion on the rights of return for Palestinian refugees.

The prince, who held talks with Bush on the Middle East crisis last month, said that Arabs would not accept a partial Israeli pullout and Israel had to return all Arab land.

“A withdrawal is not enough, there must be a return to the pre-1967 aggression lines and an end to the occupation of Jerusalem so that it becomes the capital of Palestine,” said Prince Abdullah, the architect of a Middle East peace initiative that won Arab and international backing.

“The return of refugees is also a must,” he told the London-based paper.

The de facto ruler of the oil superpower praised Bush for supporting the long-standing Arab demand for the creation of an independent Palestinian state.

“I must say that President Bush has played an active role… by insisting on the necessity of the creation of a Palestinian state at a time the Israeli forces tried to annul the Palestinian Authority,” the paper quoted him as saying.

Prince Abdullah said it was “too early” for the kingdom to say whether it would take part in possible peace negotiations with Israel. “Our priority is to lift the suffering of our brothers in Palestine, and we will do our utmost to restore Arab rights.” This piece ran in Ha’aretz on May 12, 2002

Sharm al-Shaykh Summit Statement: from Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia: Implement the “Right of Return”

[IMRA: While the Israeli media presents the Sharm al-Shaykh summit statement as “moderate” statement, an examination of the text finds that it uses terminology that means only one thing: right of return of refugees.

“Just and comprehensive peace within the framework of international legitimacy” and “the Arab rights endorsed by all international legislations” both include UN Resolution 194 – right of return of refugees.]

[FBIS Transcribed Text]
Sharm el Sheikh, May 11 (MENA) – President Hosni Mubarak, Syrian President Bashar el-Assad and Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah Ben Abdel Aziz underlined the necessity of implementing resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly on the dispatch of a fact-finding panel on war crimes perpetrated by Israeli occupation forces in Jenin.

In a joint statement at the conclusion of their summit late Saturday, the three leaders stressed the need to continue to work on enhancing Arab solidarity in all fields to preserve Arab security on the basis of safeguarding the supreme interests of the Arab and Islamic nation.

The leaders saluted the Palestinian people’s stamina, hailed the heroic intifada in face of the Israeli occupation forces and war machine and condemned the massacres perpetrated by the Israeli occupation against children, women and elders.

The three Arab leaders specifically condemned what Israel did in Jenin.

They also reiterated commitment to the peace initiative endorsed by the Beirut Arab summit, reaffirmed a genuine Arab interest in peace and voiced rejection of all forms of violence.

The leaders tackled the regional and international situation, especially the grave situation in the occupied Palestinian lands and its repercussion on world and regional security, said the statement.

They also discussed the U.S. position as regards the latest developments in the region and the current events in the occupied Palestinian lands in light of Prince Abdullah’s briefing about the outcome of his key visit to the U.S. and his talks with U.S. President George Bush and his administration officials, it added.

The three leaders underlined that the Arab peace initiative is the basis for any Arab action to realise the aspired-for just and comprehensive peace within the framework of international legitimacy, said the statement.

They lambasted the massacres committed by the Israeli occupation forces against Palestinians without a humanitarian or legal deterrents, it added.

The Arab leaders called on the world community to back the Arab rights endorsed by all international legislations and to put pressure on Israel to withdraw from all occupied Arab lands to bring in a fair and durable peace in the region, said the joint statement.

President Mubarak, President Bashar and Crown Prince Abdullah agreed on continuing contacts and consultations.