Israel derangement syndrome

A mass psychotic epidemic of pavlovian responses targeting Israel and its supporters is currently raging worldwide.

Like its close relative, Trump derangement syndrome, one has only to mention the words Israel, Zionist or Jew, in order for convulsive condemnations to be spewed forth with venomous vitriol.

In many cases, the responses are unhinged and clearly indicate latent prejudices bubbling to the surface.

There’s no cure for this malicious malady because the rot has become incestuous, infecting large swathes of humanity. True facts and logical arguments are of no avail. Appealing to a sense of logic is a lost cause because, like all such derangement syndromes, cures no longer work.

One can only expose and shine a strong light on this pathological phenomenon in the hope that those still resistant to irrational thoughts might be able to wage a counterattack against the disease.

Take the Australian Government’s revoking of a visa for Hillel Fuld as one of the latest examples of this deranged mindset.

This Israeli influencer and advocate had been booked to visit Australia and speak at fundraising events for the national ambulance service, Magen David Adom. His visa had been approved in advance and all seemed in order. Prior to his scheduled departure, some Islamic and anti-Israel groups in Australia got wind that he was arriving. They complained to the immigration authorities that this individual was an “Islamophobic” threat and likely to cause serious problems.

Quicker than you can say “kangaroo court” the Federal Cabinet Minister in charge of immigration cancelled his visa and declared him a “threat to the health, safety and good order” of Australians.

What is his alleged crime?

Obviously, being a Jewish Israeli who articulates uncomfortable truths about jihadist death cults must be one of his original sins.

The fact that his late brother was murdered by a Palestinian terrorist at a shopping centre not far from where we live obviously never resonated with the politician who rushed to ban him.

His opposition to the creation of “Palestine” in the heartland of Israel must be another black mark against him. The fact that this intended fake country would be a terror-supporting entity in our midst is irrelevant to many Israel haters and ignoramuses of history.

That was the same reason that the current Australian Government banned the visit of former Israeli Justice Minister, Ayelet Shaked at the end of 2024. Her crime for articulating uncomfortable facts was a perceived “threat to social cohesion”.

Presumably, the poisonous rhetoric articulated against Jews and Israel by Australian-based Islamic preachers poses no such threat. This must be so because there have been no consequences.

Could the fact that the Minister’s electorate has a large number of voters who identify as Muslims and whose anti-Israel views are no secret, have anything to do with his decision?

I predicted that post election the “chickens would come home to roost” and so it is transpiring. Who would have thought a few years ago that Jewish Israelis would be barred from entering Australia because they had the temerity to point out some basic home truths?

Interestingly, I searched in vain for a comprehensive report of this sordid affair on the website of the Sydney Morning Herald. I could find no mention of this scandalous situation. It may be that something was buried in an obscure part of the site but, if so, it certainly was well hidden.

What I did discover, however, was a headline which read “My grandmother fled the Holocaust. Now it is time for Jews to abandon Israel.” Revealed for all to see is the murky agenda of many in the media. What lies behind this obsessive urge to dig up disaffected self loathers in order to smear Israel?

It is a classic case of an Israel derangement syndrome on steroids infecting the Australian body politic of what was once a safe haven for Jews.

In contrast, SKY Australia has given the subject of Fuld’s banning extensive publicity.

A perfect example of how deranged news and views now dominate the media was recently revealed.

I happened to come across a YouTube presentation which asserted in all seriousness that “the Zionists did not make the desert bloom. The Palestinians did.” Anyone viewing this work of fiction would immediately be brainwashed into believing that the “colonial Jewish occupiers” took over a land which was a verdant paradise. Instead of barren land and swamps, the so-called “indigenous” Palestinians had cultivated the land since the time of the Canaanites. It was apparently the colonial Jewish settlers who falsified history in order to justify their illegal occupation.

That is how lies are sanitised and false revisionist fables multiply, all eagerly embraced by the growing legions of Zionist haters.

SKY NEWS UK provided a gem of tendentious reporting. Its headline proclaimed, “British surgeon maintains that the only people she has ever seen in Gaza with weapons are the IDF.”  There you have it in one sentence. There are presumably no armed terrorists in Gaza. The only people armed are the IDF which “proves” that Israel is engaged in “genocidal” activities.

Welcome to the deranged purveyors of deliberately deceitful news.

Another example of unhinged behaviour could easily be entitled “a life on the ocean waves.”

Starring Greta Thunberg in a leading role, this maritime farce to Gaza was always going to be a media publicity stunt designed with only one aim in mind.

It was never about sending any sort of meaningful aid to the allegedly starving people of Gaza. With less than a truckload of actual aid on board whatever would have been left after a period at sea was hardly likely to have helped more than a handful.

The sole objective right from the start was to create a hoped-for international incident whereby Israel could be pilloried and condemned. What better visuals might there be than the sight of the IDF storming the vessel, causing countless casualties and even better, sinking the boat?

One could almost hear the “humanitarian” crew salivating at the thought of a major media spectacle in the making. The closer they came to the Israeli coast the more frantic and frenetic were their social media performances. It was as though they were daring the Israelis to attack and thereby fulfil their hoped-for expectations.

The international media naturally played along with this pathetic performance. As complicit partners in this comedy of errors they reported each and every act. No doubt, prospective headlines and photos of Israeli “brutal force” to come whetted their appetites for what promised to be front-page news.

After such a build-up, imagine the devastating let-down when Israeli naval personnel calmly boarded and handed out bottles of water and sandwiches. Photos of Greta accepting this food must have been a massive blow to the over-inflated egos of the intrepid crew.

What do you do when your main props and predicted violence fail to materialise?

The fallback position was soon revealed.

Throwing mobile phones and other electronic equipment overboard was swiftly followed by accusations of “kidnapping” and “violations of international law.”  The media, sadly deprived of a spectacle, resorted to the usual misrepresentations and fudged facts.

The Israeli Government assembled the motley mob and screened for their edification a documentary on the atrocities committed by their Gaza terrorist friends on 7 October 2023, in a futile attempt to impart some actual reality. Refusing to be confused by any sort of facts, the intrepid protesters preferred neither to view nor to listen.

This is par for the course and exposes the real agenda of all those pillorying Israel.

Greta has now been flown back into the welcoming arms of all her European and Scandinavian groupies. Those who refused to be expelled voluntarily from Israel are detained and deported later.

It’s a pity that these hypocrites were not made to “walk the plank” and forced to spend the rest of their days in the welcoming embrace of Hamas. Incarcerated in the underground tunnels of Gaza and experiencing jihadist hospitality would have been a fitting conclusion to their juvenile expedition.

At least Israel has declared them persona non Greta.”

The pathogen of anti-Israel derangement is now rampaging unchecked through the foreign ministries of so-called “friendly” nations.

Stand by for further developments.

Greta refused to watch October 7 footage. But would it have changed her mind?

47 Minutes of Evil Greta Wouldn’t Watch (Judean Rose)

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

On June 9, 2025, Israeli naval forces intercepted the Madleen, a rusty, overhyped, and under-provisioned “aid boat” that sailed with great drama from Europe to Gaza. Onboard: Greta Thunberg, a few other professional protesters, and a pathetic 100 kilograms of flour.

To put that in perspective: Israel facilitates hundreds of aid trucks to Gaza every single day, carrying hundreds of tons of food, medicine, diapers, and fuel. Greta brought enough flour to feed roughly 330 people for one day—assuming Hamas or hungry mobs don’t steal it first, which is precisely what happened to UN flour shipments this week.

In exchange for this performative voyage, Greta got what she came for: selfies, headlines, and a chance to pretend she was the moral conscience of the world. But what she didn’t expect was Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz offering her and her selfie-yacht companions a front-row seat to truth.

The Film They Refused to Watch

Israel prepared a 47-minute documentary, “Bearing Witness to the October 7 Massacre,” which compiles footage directly from Hamas bodycams and GoPro devices worn during the pogrom. The footage is unsparing: rape, torture, execution, mutilation. It’s not Israel’s word against Hamas—it’s Hamas filming its own barbarism, proud, gleeful, laughing as they slit throats and shoot children point-blank.

Greta and gang were invited to watch. According to multiple media accounts, they agreed to begin, then either shut their eyes or turned away, refusing to take in more than a few seconds. Maybe they knew what they would see. Maybe they were afraid they’d lose the ability to justify their moral theater.

Maybe they already had seen it—and simply didn’t care.

Historical Precedents: Can Footage Change Minds?

Israel’s tactic wasn’t new. There’s a long history of using atrocity footage to rip the mask off sanitized evil:

·        Nuremberg Trials (1945): The Allies didn’t just charge Nazis—they made the court and the world watch what they found in the camps. British and American cameramen documented the piles of corpses, gas chambers, and starved survivors. The footage stunned even hardened prosecutors. German civilians were marched into local theaters and made to watch. Some fainted. Others wept. A few denied. But the films worked: they shattered any lingering doubt—at least for a time.

·        Vietnam (1972): The iconic photo of “Napalm Girl,” 9-year-old Kim Phuc screaming, her skin burned off, turned American public opinion decisively against the war. One picture—raw, ugly, undeniable—shifted the moral calculus more than a thousand op-eds could ever have done.

·        Rwanda (1994): In contrast, during the Rwandan genocide, footage was deliberately suppressed. The Clinton White House wouldn’t call it genocide, and CNN didn’t show rivers filled with hacked bodies. Result? Nothing was done. No outrage, no pressure, no intervention. Without images, there was no movement.

·        Israel, 2023–24: The IDF’s October 7 footage has been shown to journalists, diplomats, foreign correspondents, and lawmakers. At a screening in Los Angeles, attendees were reportedly shaken. Some demanded to see more—beheadings, rapes—in order to confront the full horror. A separate screening for foreign journalists in Israel left many stunned. And at Harvard, a screening organized by Chabad with support from Bill Ackman reportedly prompted some students to reconsider their assumptions.

But no screening has been more visceral than the one held for members of the Israeli Knesset.

On November 6, 2023, over 100 MKs watched a version of the October 7 footage at the Knesset. What followed was human, gut-wrenching, and painfully real: some parliamentarians burst into tears. Others vomited. Several ran from the room. The footage, reported by the Jerusalem Post, was described as “unbearable.” Likud MK Galit Distel sobbed and shouted, “Where is the world?” Another member said, “I have no more tears left to cry.”

A short video clip from the screening shows elected officials weeping uncontrollably and being comforted by colleagues as they fled the hall.

This is how decent people react when confronted with evil. With horror. With grief. With rage.

Now compare that to Greta Thunberg and the Madleen crew, who closed their eyes and turned their heads when given the opportunity to bear witness. These are the same people who flew across continents to play martyr in Gaza. Who accuse Israel of genocide while refusing to look Hamas genocide in the face. They couldn’t handle 47 minutes of footage—but they feel qualified to comment on 75 years of Jewish history.

There’s a word for that. But let’s just call it what it is: moral cowardice.

One Boat Does Not a Flotilla Make

The Madleen carried no aid worth mentioning, no moral compass worth respecting, and no courage whatsoever. It was a stunt—and everyone knows it. Everyone on that boat knew that Israel would be polite and diplomatic, and that they were completely safe at all times, free to watch or not watch the footage as they pleased, and offered sandwiches, bottles of water, and a free flight back to Europe, where they belong.

Israel should be commended for showing restraint—because really, Greta Thunberg’s face begs to be slapped. But no. Israel did nothing of the sort.

Fifteen years ago, during the Mavi Marmara incident, things got violent. This time? No shots. No injuries. The IDF simply rerouted the Madleen’s symbolic “aid,” through proper humanitarian channels, handed the activists sandwiches, and gave them a chance to learn something.

They declined.

Greta had a moment—a chance to really bear witness.

She blinked.

Then she shut her eyes.

​Terror-Affiliated Businessman Behind the Intercepted Greta Thunberg Flotilla

A terror-affiliated businessman is reportedly behind the boat that was stopped by IDF last night carrying Swedish ‘activist’ Greta Thunberg and others towards Gaza.

Zahar Birawi is a founding member of the ‘Freedom Flotilla’, the organization which sent the yacht, named ‘Madleen’ towards Gaza, claiming to be on a humanitarian mission.

Birawi is a Palestinian based in Britain and was previously the chairman of Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), of which the armed wing is a proscribed terror group.

In addition to being chairman of MAB, Birawi was a board trustee for Education Aid for Palestinians (EAP), whose members are identified with Hamas, and involved in transferring funds to Hamas.

He was also involved in sending convoys and ships to the Gaza Strip, including involvement in the organization of the Mavi Marmara flotilla at the end of May 2010, which was found to contain weapons.

According to Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, since October 7, he has been promoting initiatives to send “aid ships” to Gaza Strip as part of his role as chief of the International Committee to Break the Siege on Gaza (ICBSG).

Regarding the financing of the boat, Dr. Hayim Iserovich, Deputy Director and Head of Research at the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center told TPS-IL: “We don’t have proof on papers, but since he is the head of the committee and a leader of Freedom Flotilla Coalition, he played a significant role in funding and organising it.”

Thunberg, 22, and several others, including Irish Game of Thrones actor Liam Cunningham, 64, boarded a small ‘pleasure’ boat which left the shore of Italy last Sunday.

Last night, IDF forces intercepted the vessel before it reached Gaza, and took the crew to Israel, who will each soon be deported back to their respective countries, including Brazil, Germany, France and Turkey.

Many on board are known to publicly support Hamas and Hezbollah on social media.

The interception came days after Defense Minister Israel Katz issued an order for the IDF to take ‘any measures necessary’.

Katz stated at the time: “The State of Israel will not allow anyone to violate the naval blockade on Gaza — whose primary purpose is to prevent the transfer of weapons to Hamas, a murderous terrorist organization that holds our hostages and commits war crimes.

“I have instructed the IDF to act to ensure that the ‘Madleen’ flotilla does not reach Gaza.

To the antisemitic Greta and her Hamas propaganda-spreading friends — I say clearly; you would be wise to turn back, because you will not reach Gaza.

“Israel will act against any attempt to break the blockade or aid terrorist organizations — by sea, by air, and on land.”

The Foreign Ministry dismissed the Madleen as a publicity stunt, referring to the boat as a “selfie yacht” organized to “stage a media provocation.”

Experts yesterday called for harsher measures to act as a deterrent to self-styled ‘activists’.

Before the Enclave: A Neighborhood of Many Jews

To most people today, Hasidic Williamsburg evokes a single image: black coats, Yiddish signs, and the tightly knit world of Satmar Hasidim. It’s a neighborhood that feels sealed off, devout, insular, and focused on preserving its traditions, in contrast to the outreach-oriented Lubavitchers. But the south side of Williamsburg didn’t always look this way. More than a century ago, the streets now filled with kosher markets and boys’ yeshivas were home to a strikingly diverse Jewish population: Reform and Orthodox, Hasidim and secular Jews, Zionists and communists. The transformation of Williamsburg into a Hasidic stronghold happened slowly and gradually, over many decades.

In the early 1900s, Eastern European Jewish immigrants began moving out of Manhattan’s overcrowded Lower East Side, crossing the newly built Williamsburg Bridge in search of more space and improved living conditions. They brought with them not just belongings, but synagogues, customs, and strong communal ties. Among these early arrivals was Zecharia Dershowitz, the great-grandfather of attorney Alan Dershowitz. In 1910, he moved into a four-story house and established what would become Williamsburg’s first Hasidic shtiebel, located in the building’s basement. As Alan Dershowitz recalled in his memoir Chutzpah, the shtiebel was a family effort: his grandfather, Louis, led the prayers, while seven sons and several nephews made up the choir, singing in traditional Hasidic style.

At the time, about a third of Williamsburg’s population was Jewish, and non-Jews often stood out. While other neighborhoods, such as the Lower East Side, Brownsville, and the Bronx, also had large Jewish communities, Williamsburg was already beginning to stand out for its strong Orthodox presence. That influence shaped the atmosphere of the neighborhood, even for families that weren’t strictly observant. “You felt the Shabbes,” one resident recalled. “My father wouldn’t smoke in the street on Shabbes. My mother wouldn’t do anything outside. Inside, maybe she’d play the radio.”

As Williamsburg’s Jewish population grew, so did its religious infrastructure. A few years after Zecharia Dershowitz opened his shtiebel, others followed—including Beth Aharon on Ross Street, which became a center for some of the founding members of Yeshiva Torah Vodaath. That school, which opened in 1918 in a private home on Marcy and Keap, was a turning point. At the time, most parents sent their kids to public school and relied on afternoon religious instruction. It was the so-called frum fanatics—often Polish Hasidim—who pushed for a full-day Jewish education.

In 1923, the neighborhood welcomed one of its first Hasidic rebbes: Reb Yaakov Perlow, the Stoliner Rebbe. Known affectionately as Reb Yankele, he quickly earned a reputation for his boundless love for every Jew. Yeshiva boys on their way to Torah Vodaath would often detour through Rodney Street, hurrying to line up to see the Rebbe, who took delight in handing out candies and pennies.

Still, during the interwar years, South Williamsburg had not yet become the Hasidic enclave it would later be. The Hasidim who lived there at the time were mostly Polish and relatively moderate. Reform temples stood just a few blocks from Orthodox shtieblach, and it wasn’t uncommon for families to include both yeshiva students and committed socialists under one roof. The streets were full of working-class Jews trying to make a living. Teenagers danced in neighborhood halls and watched movies in now-vanished theaters—one of which was so run-down it was known as “The Dump,” with cats wandering through and, according to some, even the occasional dog. By 1951, the last movie theater in Jewish Williamsburg closed its doors and reopened as the home and synagogue of the Klausenburger Rebbe.

As more Hungarian Hasidim settled in Williamsburg over time, the neighborhood took on a more insular and strictly religious character, prompting many non-Hasidic Jews to gradually move elsewhere. Yet in its earlier decades, Williamsburg was shaped by diversity, change, and the quiet rise of what would eventually become a major center of American Hasidic life. In recent years, the neighborhood has drawn growing interest from tourists and online viewers, with countless YouTube videos and guided tours seeking to capture the rhythms of Hasidic daily life. Even if they only scratch the surface, these glimpses reveal something deeper: the continued curiosity about Hasidic life, and the quiet connection between this insular world and the wider public that has always been part of Williamsburg’s story.

 

Anti-Israel Campus Groups: Online Networks & Narratives

Drawing on a comprehensive dataset—including nearly 10,000 recorded antisemitic incidents, over 1,000 anti-Israel campus groups, and more than 76,000 Instagram posts—this study analyzes how digital coordination, radicalized rhetoric, and offline mobilization have converged on U.S. campuses, particularly in the wake of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks. It identifies the central actors behind a coordinated network of campus and off-campus groups whose messaging increasingly mirrors that of designated terrorist organizations.

Download Report

Yair Golan, Ehud Olmert & the Sabotage of Israel’s Elites

Something heartbreaking is happening in Israel—and unless we name it, we cannot defeat it.
While brave IDF soldiers fight and fall to destroy our Islamonaz*i enemy, Israel’s deep state elites are working behind the scenes to prevent total victory.

Thankfully, the people of Israel are not going to let this happen. We are on the path to total victory despite the efforts of sabotage from within.

IDF Spokesman: ‘European aid funds were found in Hamas tunnels’

IDF spokesman Effie Defrin delivered a statement on Sunday from an underground facility discovered beneath the European Hospital in Khan Yunis, Gaza.

Speaking from the site, Defrin condemned the use of civilian infrastructure by Hamas, accusing the group of turning humanitarian facilities into operational terror centers. “I am standing in the underground facility beneath the European Hospital in Khan Yunis. This is where European aid funds ended up – not in medical care, but in the construction of terror tunnels and infrastructure,” he said, displaying a large pile of cash located in the tunnel

“Hamas has once again made cynical use of a civilian hospital, using it not to save lives, but to facilitate death and murder. This is one of the places from which the October 7 attacks were orchestrated.”

Defrin confirmed that senior Hamas leaders had used the facility, including Mohamed Sinwar, brother of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, and Shabana, commander of the Rafah Brigade. “This is the room where Sinwar and Shabana were staying when they were targeted by IDF strikes about a month ago. We can now confirm with certainty that Mohamed Sinwar was here and was killed in the strike,” he stated. “We will continue to hunt down every last member of Hamas until we achieve the objectives of this war.”

He was joined by soldiers from the elite Yahalom combat engineering unit and the Golani Brigade, who participated in the operation to seize the compound. “We discovered large sums of money here, not for civilian use, but to fund terrorism. Along with the cash, we found a significant stockpile of weapons,” he added.

Defrin concluded by reiterating the IDF’s commitment to dismantling Hamas’s infrastructure and leadership: “This underground complex exemplifies how Hamas exploits humanitarian resources to wage war. Our mission will not end until that threat is fully neutralized.”

Research finds 90% of reports of ‘violence’ by Judea and Samaria Jews were fake

A new report published by Israel’s Regavim Movement NGO on Sunday has found that some 90% of incidents of “violence” attributed to Judea and Samaria Jews in recent years by the United Nations were fabricated.

Regavim’s 128-page research report in English, titled “False Flags and Real Agendas,” scrutinized a database maintained by the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which claims to have documented thousands of alleged incidents of Israeli “settler violence” against Palestinian Arabs from January 2016 through April 2023.

An analysis of the 6,285 incidents documented by the U.N. showed that some 90% of the alleged acts in Judea and Samaria did not take place in the disputed territory but in eastern Jerusalem, or were entirely peaceful, such as visits by Israeli Jews to the Temple Mount, Judaism’s holiest site, as well as legal activities such as civilian hikes or infrastructure work.

Filtered for verified incidents of physical violence by Israeli Jews against Palestinians, the list shrinks to just 833 cases over a period of seven and a half years, averaging fewer than 10 incidents per month, according to Regavim.

In addition, the Regavim report found that many of these confirmed cases were also misclassified or involved anti-Israel provocations orchestrated by Palestinian and foreign left-wing activist groups.

Examination of the reports also revealed that “in many of them, it is not settler violence of one kind or another, but rather the opposite: these are terror attacks by Arabs against settlers that ended with the injury or elimination of the attacker,” according to the research document.

Regavim said that the term “settler violence” has been used by global bodies, media outlets and left-wing activists to draw a false moral equivalence between Israel’s presence in Judea and Samaria and Palestinian terrorism.

“For years, we have been told about a ‘serious phenomenon’ of settler violence, but we have never been shown the data that proves that it exists,” Meir Deutsch, Regavim’s director-general, said in a statement.

“After years in which there was no pushback whatsoever against this false narrative, Regavim is presenting the facts, and they must be seen, heard and internalized in Israel and around the world,” Deutsch stated.

The Israel Defense Forces recorded 663 instances of violence by Jews against Palestinians in Judea and Samaria last year, a 34% decrease compared to 2023, when 1,005 incidents were recorded by the IDF.

Meanwhile, Jerusalem recorded thousands of Palestinian terrorist attacks against Jews in 2024, including many in Judea and Samaria.

Palestinian terrorists targeted Israeli Jews in Judea and Samaria at least 6,343 times last year, according to figures published by the Rescuers Without Borders (Hatzalah Judea and Samaria) NGO on Feb. 17.

Twenty-seven Israelis were murdered in Judea and Samaria in 2024, and more than 300 others were wounded, the group said in its annual report.

New report debunks ‘settler violence’ narrative

New houses being constructed at the Israeli settlement of Eldad, south of Bethlehem in the West Bank. Settlements are illegal under international law, yet despite condemnation from the international community, continue to expand on Palestinian land. There are over half a million Israeli settlers now living in the Palestinian West Bank. If passed, the Occupied Territories Bill would make it illegal in Ireland to trade in goods produced from these settlements. Photo : Garry Walsh/Trócaire.

The “settler violence” campaign, which claims that violence against Arabs by Jewish “settlers” spiked post-Oct. 7, 2023, is based on fraudulent numbers, according to a report published on Sunday.

The campaign’s goal, according to the report, is to defame not merely the Jewish communities of Judea and Samaria, but the Israeli army and by extension the entire State of Israel.

The 125-page report, “False Flags and Real Agendas,” produced by Israeli NGO Regavim, describes the “settler violence” smear as a “modern-day blood libel.”

The report dissects the narrative and the numbers behind the slander, which went into overdrive following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack. A flurry of news items appeared in the liberal mainstream press in the United States and elsewhere about escalating “settler violence” in Judea and Samaria.

These reports claimed that Jewish violence had increased in retaliation for the Hamas massacre. “The breadth and intensity of the violence has revived memories of the ‘nakba,’ or catastrophe, during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were forced from their homes, never to return,” reported The Washington Post on Nov. 9, 2023.

In February 2024, the Biden administration, for the first time, sanctioned Israelis it claimed had engaged in violence against Arab civilians, citing “high levels of extremist settler violence, forced displacement of people and villages and property destruction.” It would sanction more Israelis in subsequent months, along with certain pro-Israel NGOs. (Regavim was threatened with sanctions though none were applied.)

The Biden White House justified its interference in another country’s internal affairs by claiming that Israel’s government had not done enough to “hold accountable extremist settlers who commit acts of violence,” in the words of then-State Department spokesman Matthew Miller.

While the Trump administration has cancelled the sanctions, other countries, such as France, have gone still further, calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state. One of their arguments is that the Palestinians require a state to protect them from violent “settlers.”

The campaign received a “shot of steroids” after the Oct. 7 attack because those promoting a Palestinian state felt the need to create moral equivalence between “Hamas and settlers,” Naomi Kahn, director of the International Division at Regavim, told JNS.

If Jewish residents just want to live in peace while the other side engages in mass murder, it’s much harder to justify kicking the former off their land. So it’s necessary to demonize the Jewish side, she explained.

However, the smear campaign goes beyond the issue of Judea and Samaria, she said, noting there’s a reason the radical groups behind the campaign repeatedly claim Israeli soldiers “accompany” the Jewish attackers.

“More than delegitimizing the Jewish presence there, it’s about delegitimizing the moral standing of the IDF. It’s portrayed as the army that allows this immorality to happen. By attacking the army of the Jewish state, you attack the entire Jewish state,” she said.

The problem for those looking to delegitimize Israel through the “settler violence” claim is that the data doesn’t support their narrative.

Regavim’s report notes that “a core part of this targeted defamation activity” is produced by groups with severe anti-Israel bias, such as B’Tselem and Yesh Din, which started collecting Arab testimonies of “settler violence” in 2005.

In 2008, the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) followed suit and started publishing numbers based on reports and data from these left-wing groups. It is the “authoritative,” supposedly objective, source cited most in the media.

The United Nations pays the salaries of some of the groups that supply the numbers, according to Kahn. “They pay them to create the narrative, and then they take that narrative and say, ‘Here’s your proof.’ But they’ve paid them to create that proof. It’s very circular.”

None of OCHA’s sources can be considered impartial or independent, she noted. “The Palestinian Authority’s Colonization & Wall Resistance Commission is not an objective source. It’s like quoting the Hamas Health Ministry.”

For its report, Regavim obtained 10 years of detailed incident reports from OCHA. It found that the vast majority of incidents, 98%, didn’t involve Jewish civilians at all.

“We took out all of the incidents in which there were no civilians involved on the Israeli side, meaning these were clashes with the IDF. We were then left with only 2% of the original number,” said Kahn.

“We analyzed that 2% and we cross-referenced it by date and location with the police and Shabak [Israel Security Agency] reports. What we found was in an overwhelming majority of cases, it was self-defense by Jews, or it was undetermined—a two-way scuffle. So you can’t actually call that settler violence,” she said.

According to B’Tselem’s own data, in 2022 every Palestinian recorded as killed by Jewish civilians in Judea and Samaria was “in fact killed as a result of either an attack or attempted attack carried out by that individual or by another Palestinian,” Regavim’s report notes.

Other incidents classified as “settler violence” included Jewish hikers entering archaeological sites in Samaria (no clashes involved), car accidents, road paving by the Israeli government and in one particularly absurd case, “an Arab worker who was bitten by a dog in the settlement where he was employed.”

Although OCHA claims each incident is verified by two independent sources, Regavim learned this is not the case. “Almost none of them were. The ones that had two sources—it was actually the same source under two different names. They would use the Arabic name and the English name for the same Palestinian Authority ministry,” said Kahn.

While Regavim stressed that Jewish violence does exist, and should be punished when it occurs, the numbers it says are so small as to be negligible.

“If you’re an American living in a city with a population comparable to that of Area C [the Israeli-controlled part of Judea and Samaria], you’re more than 300 times more likely to be the victim of violent crime than you are if you’re an Arab living in Area C,” she said.

“Israeli police statistics for violent incidents nationwide place Judea and Samaria at the bottom end. It’s the least violent society in Israel. So to say that this is a problem, that settlers in Judea and Samaria are violent, is simply a lie,” she added.