Israel Security Assistance Support Act

Washington, D.C. – House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee Chairman Ken Calvert (R-CA), joined by Chairman Tom Cole (R-OK), State and Foreign Operations Subcommittee Chairman Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), and Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee Chairman David Joyce (R-OH), today released the Israel Security Assistance Support Act to support our great ally and U.S. national security. The legislation curbs President Biden’s misguided efforts to withhold critical security resources appropriated in U.S. law by compelling the delivery of defense weapons to Israel as they fight to protect themselves against radical terrorists.

The Members said, “Unlike the Administration, House Appropriators will not waver in our ironclad support for Israel. The House and Senate acted on the will of the people, overwhelmingly providing Israel with the firepower to send a message: the U.S. and our allies will not cower to terrorist organizations like Hamas. The Administration is expected to utilize the very aid it requested to equip Israel with what it needs to defend itself, destroy Hamas, and maintain peace in the region. Any actions to withhold resources impede our national and global security and send a dangerous signal that the U.S. cannot be counted on as a partner. We demand the Administration fulfill our commitment to our great ally in the Middle East, especially so in this serious time of need.”

The Israel Security Assistance Support Act:

  • Compels the expeditious delivery of approved defense articles and services to Israel, including third-party deliveries;
  • Withholds funds from the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State, and the National Security Council until suspended defense articles are delivered;
  • Condemns the Biden Administration’s dangerous decision to pause arms as Israel faces unprecedented threats from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iran;
  • Reaffirms Israel’s right to self-defense;
  • Upholds the power of the purse and oversight responsibilities of Congress; and
  • Requires a report on actions taken by the Executive Branch to withhold security assistance and therefore impede Israel’s ability to defend itself.

At a time when Israel is facing increased attacks, including the imprisonment of their citizens and Americans by Hamas terrorists—alongside the rise of other global threats, antisemitism, and campus demonstrations around the U.S. that have empowered anti-Jewish aggression—this bill is a vital step in standing with our allies and supporting the U.S.-Israel alliance.

ContactAlexia SikoraAlex Attebery, (202) 225-2771

The Attack on Iran’s IRGC Leaders in Damascus and the Iranian Attack on Israel: An Iranian View

Political leaders make policy based on their perceptions, not those of others. Americans/Westerners tend to believe that people who speak good English think like Americans. They don’t. Even worse, some of the West’s worst enemies speak superb English; they use this skill against us. We ignore this fact at our peril.

Javad Zarif, Iran’s then-foreign minister, bamboozled then-President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry into submitting to Iran’s demands in what began the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) —which was, in essence, American submission to Iran’s will. Zarif bragged about this in his tell-all book in Persian.

We cannot understand the attack on Iran’s senior IRGC leaders in Damascus on April 1, 2024, which many attribute to Israel, and the subsequent Iranian attack on Israel without taking the above into account.

Iranians constantly worry about a “Grand Conspiracy” (in Persian Tote-e-ye Bozorg) against them and their country. The events of the past few weeks fit perfectly into this mindset.

The Iranians ask: How did Israel know precisely when and where to eliminate Iran’s senior IRGC leadership in Syria and Lebanon?

Iranians reason: it was their erstwhile Alawite allies in Syria who run the country, i.e., President Assad.

How does Iran know this? Because the Alawites, though an offshoot of Shiism, aren’t truly allies because, while they both share the belief in the centrality of Muhammad’s cousin Ali as the central figure of their respective religions, Alawites see Ali as a god, which is anathema to Shiism. So, in the end, no matter how close they are as allies against the Sunnis, the Shiites have long suspected them as unreliable.

The Iranians reason: Assad’s people knew which Iranians were there. And Assad has been somewhat “unreliable” lately. How did Israel “get to them? Did Assad change sides?”

The Alawite-Jewish-Sunni Plot

In the 1930s and early ‘40s, Alawite leaders often saw the Jews in Palestine as an ally against the Sunnis, who then ruled Syria and were the largest group in British Palestine. Assad’s great-grandfather was one of seven Alawite leaders who signed a letter to the French rulers of Syria asking them to set up an independent Alawite State in Syria. In the letter,1 they cite the way the Sunnis were treating the Jews in Palestine as the way the Sunnis treated the Alawites in Syria. One of those Alawite leaders who signed this was the great-grandfather of Bashar Assad, the present leader of Syria.

(See below: The actual documents where the Alawites compare their situation to the Jews under Sunni/Muslim rule.)

Document where the Alawites compare their situation to the Jews under Sunni/Muslim rule.
Document where the Alawites compare their situation to the Jews under Sunni/Muslim rule.

So now, “behind the curtain (posht-e pardeh),” as they say in Persian, this supposedly “proves” the Alawite-Jewish/Israel connection.

How Did Iran’s Missile Attack on Israel Fail so Miserably?

Let’s continue the reasoning: How did? That is a miracle, even by scientific standards! Does this mean that Allah is against them? If so, what is Iran doing wrong? We have heard multiple answers to this question.

One more interesting suggestion from Iranians is that the leadership feels pushed into the corner. This fact plays into the hands of one of the ruling factions in Iran, which believes that if they provoke a conflagration with the Jews, then their Mahdi (Messiah) would come down and save them. The late Professor Bernard Lewis used to say, for them, a conflagration was an incentive, not a deterrent.

Others within the Iran regime fear an Israeli attack and do NOT want to go for broke.

Read the Writing on the Wall

But what concerned the Iranian regime even more was that Israel’s fantastic success deeply humiliated the Iranian government.

After Israel’s strike, graffiti began appearing on the streets in Iran. Though we don’t know how widespread it was, we know that the Iranian people were emboldened because they scribbled on walls asking Israel to continue striking. “You (i.e., Israel) go after the regime, and we will go out into the streets (and do the rest.)”

Graffitti

To complicate matters further, we have been hearing from many people in the Arab world and Iranians that there are now two opposing alliances in the Middle East:

  1. the American administration and their ally – the Iranian government.
  2. the Arab Sunni regimes (minus Qatar) and Israel.

Why do more and more Middle Easterners believe this? Because the American administration is putting massive pressure on the Israelis NOT to attack Iran’s allies – i.e., not to go into Rafah in the Gaza Strip and destroy Iran’s Hamas ally, not to go after Hizbullah, the Iranian’s fifth column in Lebanon, and, of course, not to attack Iran.

Absurd Conclusions

From the Iranian perspective, this “proves” that their view of the American-Iran alliance vs. Israel makes perfect sense.

From both an Iranian and Sunni Arab perspective, the American administration has shown that it is doing everything it can to strengthen the Iranian regime at the expense of America’s supposed ally Israel, America’s supposed Arab Sunni Allies, and finally, against the Iranian people.

Absurd? Certainly, from a Western point of view!

But it makes perfect sense to Middle Easterners.

Dr. Mordechai Kedar – Debate, Speaking Tour

Dear friends and colleagues,

  1. Recently I took part in a heated debate on SKY News in Arabic about Israel and peace with its neighbors.

2. I am offering to speak to your congregation or organization in person or via Zoom. There is so much to hear and learn about Israel and the Middle East especially at this time and I am available to speak in person or via Zoom to your audience. List of suggested topics – below.

Dr. Mordechai Kedar
Researcher at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, Bar-Ilan University
NEWSRAEL’s vice president
Kedar@newsrael.com
Phone and WhatsApp in Israel: +972-54-477-8908

List of suggested topics

Understanding Arab and Muslim Culture

1.The roots of Anti-Semitism in Islam. Why are Muslims taught to hate Jews?
2.What is the struggle over Jerusalem all about?
3.Islam – A religion at war, Sunnis vs Shi’is.
4.Islamic Radicalism – Causes, ideology, and ways to face it.
5.The Right of Return: Jews vs Muslims
6.The Other Voices in the Muslim World – My personal experience.

Israel Today

1.What are the origins of the Hamas-Israel conflict?
2.Who is Hamas? What do they really want?
3.What is the difference between Hamas and Hezbollah?
4.Can the “two state solution” resolve the conflict between the Arabs and Israel?

General Issues:

  1. Jew-Hatred / Antisemitism: roots, causes and ways to deal with it.
  2. Israel and the Diaspora: How to minimize the gap?
  3. The European Jewry – past, present, and future predictions
  4. The Muslim mass migration to Europe and its consequences and effects on the Jewish communities

Israeli Issues:

  1. Understanding the Israeli Electoral System
  2. What are Israel’s rights in Judea and Samaria and in the Golan Heights?
  3. Israel’s Political System: Right, Center and Left
  4. Pressing issues in Israel today

Israel and its neighbors

  1. The strategy of USA and Russia in the Middle East

2. Israel in 2024: Achievements and Challenges

3. Challenges and Opportunities in a Changing Middle East
4. Different views of peace in the Middle East
5. The challenges the world is facing from Iran – what motivates the Ayatollahs?

Jewish Topics

Sefer Bereshis – A view through the looking glass of the Middle Eastern culture

Would you want your child to to go to an UNRWA summer camp?

For the past 15 years, as a community organizer turned investigative reporter, I have held the unique position of running the sole agency which documents UNRWA summer camps . Assisted by three Arab journalists and three Jewish journalists with a deep understanding of Arab culture, my task has been to share the unsettling realities witnessed since I first covered UNRWA in 1987.

Each summer, the UNRWA camps engage in simulations depicting the violence they believe is necessary for claiming and “returning to Palestine.” The so-called “fun games” revolve around preparing for the perceived war to “liberate Palestine”.

Shockingly, children at UNRWA summer camps practice activities such as kidnapping soldiers, burning IDF vehicles, and handling short-lived weapons.

Having now prepared a compilation of UNRWA summer camp footage, we will present it to the Knesset and the embassies of countries that donate to the $1.6 billion UNRWA budget.

It is disturbing to witness the simulation games the children learned at these camps which now seem all too real, especially given the events of October 7, when thousands of incited Arab youngsters invaded the Negev.

While most journalists find joy in their achievements, my scoop brings little pleasure. The evidence points to UNRWA directing the war, with Hamas acting as the agent. The films and footage captured at UNRWA summer camps will serve as a valuable resource for generations of investigators examining the events of October 7 that caught the world by surprise.

The perplexing question arises is: How is it possible that no one seemed to know that UNRWA used its summer camps to train an army of young people for guerrilla warfare aimed at total insurrection?

On August 1, 2000, UNRWA formally adopted the “right of return” curriculum of the Palestinian Authority. Now, it has transformed it into the “right of return” by force of arms, as witnessed on October 7, 2023. Astonishingly, not a single nation calls for the removal of such a lethal curriculum.

And on July 1, 2024, UNRWA will conduct these same violent prone summer camps for descendants of Arab refugees who live in UNRWA camps in Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Jerusalem.

Throughout these seven months of armed confrontation, the IDF has discovered arsenals of weapons in the UNRWA schools and medical facilities.

This is the time to compile how UNRWA facilities were transformed into arsenals, before the UNRWA summer camps commence. This is the time to review the UNRWA curriculum once again and to ask for the removal of the murder murals around the UNRWA schools and to share the evidence of weapons in the UNRWA schools, before the UNRWA summer camps commence.

Biden is betraying American interests as well as Israel

Israeli reserve soldiers take part in a military drill in the Golan Heights in northern Israel on May 8, 2024. Photo by Ayal Margolin/Flash90.

This isn’t the first dispute between the governments of the United States and Israel. Nor is it the first time that Washington has used the supply of arms to try to pressure the Jewish state to bend to its will. But there is no precedent for what President Joe Biden has just done.

By declaring that he will stop supplying weapons to Israel, including high-tech heavy bombs and artillery shells, if it seeks to enter Rafah and eliminate Hamas’s last remaining stronghold in Gaza, the president was making a clear declaration that the United States was mandating an end to the war that the terrorist group began with the massacre of men, women and children on Oct. 7.

Should Israel bow to Biden’s diktat, then it would mean that a genocidal terrorist group wouldn’t merely survive to live and fight again, and thereby make good on its promise to commit more Oct. 7 horrors in the future. Such a development would also mean that Hamas would be seen as the victor in the conflict. That is something that would have far-reaching consequences not just for Israel and its security, but for regional Arab allies of the United States. It would also be a signal triumph for Hamas’s main backer Iran and its terrorist auxiliaries.

A duplicitous Holocaust speech

This shocking betrayal of Israel was made all the more bitter by the president’s duplicitous decision to hold off the announcement until after he gave a speech to commemorate the Holocaust at the U.S. Capitol on May 7—exactly seven months to the day of the atrocities—during which he expressed not just steadfast support for Israel, but a stinging rebuke of Hamas and a promise not to forget what it did on Oct. 7. At the time, given the fact that threats of an arms cutoff were already in the air, there was good reason to believe that the otherwise exemplary speech was part of a double game that the administration was playing, in which it sought to continue to speak out of both sides of its mouth on the war against Hamas.

But as could have been easily seen at the time, despite the president’s exhortation that he would “not forget” what Hamas had done or the plight of the hostages it took on Oct. 7, he had already done so.

The administration’s maneuverings had already removed any incentive that the Islamist group had to return the estimated 130 hostages it still holds (though no one knows how many are still alive) or give up its quest to get back control of Gaza it lost as a result of the Israeli counter-offensive. Biden’s team has been relentlessly pressuring Israel to make obscene concessions to the terrorists in the hostage negotiations. Unsurprisingly, no matter what Israel concedes, it’s never enough for Hamas. Since its leaders believe Biden won’t let them be defeated, they can continue to say “no” without any consequences.

The announcement of the arms cutoff will only make that more certain. Despite continuing to pay lip service to the quest for a hostage deal, Biden’s threats to Israel have basically sealed the fate of the hostages, including the five Americans still being held by Hamas, presumably somewhere in the tunnels underneath Rafah.

An unprecedented betrayal

Biden’s Jewish apologists can point to disputes between past Israeli governments and the Nixon, Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Obama administrations, when Washington sought to use its leverage over Israel to force it to do its bidding. But never before has an American president done so in the midst of a war with a terrorist group with whom no peace deal is even theoretically possible.

It was one thing for Henry Kissinger to stop Israel from achieving a decisive victory over Egypt in the 1973 Yom Kippur War in the hope that this would lead—as it did a few years later—to an end to the conflict between those two nations. It’s quite another for Biden to save a genocidal group like Hamas from being destroyed and therefore make it the dominant voice of Palestinian nationalism for the foreseeable future.

Hopes for a two-state solution to the conflict were always a product of magical Western thinking that ignored the fact that neither Hamas nor the supposedly more moderate Fatah Party and the Palestinian Authority that it leads were equally unwilling to recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state, no matter where its borders could be drawn. But allowing Hamas to hold onto control of any part of Gaza and to treat its preservation as an American foreign-policy priority that supersedes the alliance with Israel will ensure that the Islamists’ influence over Palestinian politics and culture will only increase.

Had the United States not prevented Israel from quickly and decisively defeating and eliminating every vestige of Hamas from Gaza, there could have been a chance for the Palestinians to understand that they needed to change their political culture, and genuinely embrace peace and coexistence with Israel. Much like the Germans who drew the only possible conclusion from the defeat of their country and the reduction of its cities to rubble in 1945, the Palestinians could have been forced to change. This was their opportunity to accept a shift in their sense of national identity, which, up until now, has been inextricably linked to their war to destroy Israel. But thanks to the international movement that arose to defend Hamas in the wake of Oct. 7 and the surge in antisemitism associated with it, the Palestinians remain still convinced that their fantasy of a world in which Israel is erased is possible. And by bowing to pressure from those who think this way, Biden has ensured that the slaughter will continue. That will help Hamas strengthen its presence in Judea and Samaria, and raise the possibility of a return to more Second Intifada-style terrorism.

It also means that even if Israel does do what it must and cleans out Rafah, the terrorist group will be encouraged to regroup and resume the fight as soon as it can. An Israel abandoned by the United States in this manner—and an arms cutoff will be just the start—will be subjected to American retaliation against the Jewish state for disobeying its superpower ally. The next step would be for Washington to go along with all sorts of U.N. sanctions or recognition of Palestinian statehood that will make Israel a pariah state.

No matter who is leading the Jewish state, Israel will not meekly surrender to this kind of pressure. Netanyahu pointed out that the 1948 War of Independence was won without U.S. arms. Indeed, as few people now seem to remember, America didn’t begin to treat Israel as an ally, rather than an annoyance and obstacle to good relations with hostile Arab states, until after it won the 1967 Six-Day War—again, largely without any real help from the Americans.

But the rupture of the alliance diminishes Israel’s strategic position in ways that are incalculable. If Hamas is still standing at the end of this war or if Israel is censured for eliminating the terror group, the threats against its security will swiftly escalate along with its international isolation. That will make the situation in the north—where Iran’s Hezbollah terrorist auxiliaries have made the border communities uninhabitable—only worse. It will also embolden Iran to use its control of Syria and its Houthis allies in Yemen to further tighten the noose around a beleaguered Jewish state.

But this isn’t only bad news for Israel.

A gift to Iran and other foes

Much as the Biden administration may still hold onto their hopes of a rapprochement with Iran, that is something that Tehran has never been interested in. They believe themselves to be at war with the West and America, even if many in the foreign-policy establishment here and in Europe wish to ignore this fact.

A defeat for Israel would make it impossible to expand on the Abraham Accords that former President Donald Trump achieved in 2020. Biden and his mouthpieces, like New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, may think that they can trade Saudi Arabian recognition of Israel for a Palestinian state that would be a reward for Hamas terrorism. The Saudis, of course, have no interest in the creation of another failed state in the region that would inevitably be linked to its Iranian enemies. An isolated Israel would not be the “strong horse” that Sunni Arabs see as a bulwark against Iran. They would have no choice but to make their peace with Tehran, meaning a diminishment of American influence in the region, whose energy resources remain important to the West.

But the consequences for the United States won’t be restricted to the Middle East.

Following the disgraceful American retreat from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021, the abandonment of an ally under attack in this manner will also send a message to other American allies about Washington’s fecklessness. That will strengthen the resolve of Russia to continue the war against Ukraine, as well as undermine Taiwan. Betraying Israel will weaken America’s credibility everywhere.

Why is Biden doing this?

To listen to the White House, they are solely motivated by humanitarian concerns about a battle in Rafah harming too many Palestinian civilians. In doing so, they are merely amplifying a lie about Israel’s military committing “genocide” in Gaza that Biden should be refuting. Israel hasn’t been engaging in wanton or indiscriminate attacks on Palestinians and has instead done its best to avoid civilian casualties—and doing so more successfully than any other modern army engaged in urban warfare.

The decision to heed the calls to limit or end aid to Israel is motivated largely by politics and assumptions on the part of the White House and left-wing Democrats about his faltering re-election campaign. After months of protests from the intersectional base of his party, Biden has done a 180-degree turn from his initial commendable support for Israel and the goal of eliminating Hamas.

As with his blunders on the international stage, this is a staggeringly obtuse mistake. Merely cutting off some arms won’t stop the antisemitic mobs on college campuses or in the streets of American cities from calling Biden “genocide Joe.” It will, in fact, only further embolden them to step up their pressure for a complete rupture with the Jewish state that Biden wouldn’t be able to satisfy even if Netanyahu orders the capture of Rafah. It will also ensure that the Democratic National Convention in Chicago this summer will be besieged by pro-Hamas demonstrators, further inflaming divisions between the leftist Democratic base and the remnants of the party’s centrists. It also ignores the fact that there are still far more votes to be lost in the pro-Israel political center of this country than on the Israel-hating left.

Fueling the surge in antisemitism

Yet the fecklessness of this move is a reminder that this is not merely a political miscalculation but an illustration of the core ideology of most of Biden’s advisers. This band of Obama administration alumni is still burning with the desire to bring Israel to heel and make it accept a re-ordering of American foreign policy in which allies like the Jewish state and the Saudis are downgraded to prioritize better relations with Iran.

Though they were frustrated in their hopes of reviving former President Barack Obama’s disastrously weak 2015 Iran nuclear deal in Biden’s first years in office, Oct. 7 presented them with a new opportunity to push for creating more “daylight” between Israel and the United States. The largest mass murder of Jews since World War II and the Holocaust reinvigorated the Iran appeasers, just as it did antisemitic foes of Israel in the streets and on college campuses.

Put in the proper perspective, the abandonment of Israel should not be seen as just another spat between the two countries about the right path towards peace or how to handle terrorist threats. Instead, it is a consequence of the rise of woke ideology throughout American society and the successful long march of the “progressives” through U.S. institutions. The goal of this movement isn’t just to impose racialist policies that will further divide Americans but also to harm the one Jewish state on the planet.

That is awful for Israel. But it is also a terrible blow to the United States. Biden’s decision is not just a gift for Hamas but also a win for the same advocates of antisemitism that the president condemned in his Holocaust commemoration speech. It will inflame the already troubling surge in antisemitism that is so frightening to American Jews.

A plucky and resourceful Jewish state will suffer from Biden’s disgraceful decision, but it will survive it. The consequences for American influence and power abroad, as well as for decency at home, may be just as if not more far-reaching.

Slippery slope

Once started, a disastrous chain of events will inevitably follow and will be almost impossible to stop.

That is what happens when the slippery slope syndrome kicks in with a vengeance.

We have witnessed it in the past and now we are in the midst of the worst example of this deranged phenomenon since the days of the Shoah.

It starts with a seemingly random event and then snowballs like an out-of-control avalanche, sweeping everything and everyone away in its path. No amount of logic and defensive action will avert the headlong rush towards collateral damage and associated carnage.

As I write these lines, sirens are sounding for two minutes throughout Israel, and the entire country stands in memory of all those murdered by the Nazis and their willing collaborators.

This year, our thoughts are also focused on a worldwide resurgence of the same hate and its mutation into lethal anti-Israel/Zionist violence.

Apart from a hard core of resurrected extreme right Nazi sympathizers who peddle conspiracy theories about Jewish world domination, we are today faced with additional groups which have embraced Jew hate. These new haters present us with unprecedented challenges because they straddle and span a wide segment of the population.

Once upon a time, those on the left of the political spectrum had an affinity with Jews suffering oppression and discrimination. Their solidarity and active involvement in the years after the Shoah and leading up to the regaining of Jewish sovereignty was a given. Most socialist politicians, with some notable exceptions, were fervent supporters of the Zionist enterprise and staunch opponents of fascist-type agitators.

How times have changed.

Nowadays, it is those on the political left who are among the most vociferous delegitimizers of the Jewish State. They are the cheerleaders for all those who accuse Israelis of being colonizers, apartheid facilitators and guilty of genocide. In a world gone mad, it is these people who now accuse Jews of being oppressors and a threat to world peace. Whereas previously, it was the lunatic right and the theologically compromised who accused Jews of blood libels and poisonings, it is now the leftist lemmings who joyfully embrace each and every such libel peddled by Islamic terrorists and their supporters.

The boycotters of anything Israeli and the enthusiastic proponents of recognizing a terror-supporting Palestine are, in the main, firmly on the left. Those in the centre and moderate right who have fallen for these objectives illustrate just how deceptive and lethal the slippery slope can be.

One sector of Israel/Jew haters remains constant.

From the very beginning of the Russian Communist era and especially since Stalin’s regime of terror there has been an almost unrelenting hatred towards Zionism and Judaism. Except for a very short lapse in 1947 when the Soviet Union voted for the UN partition plan the Kremlin has supported every Arab attempt to eradicate Israel. Although Putin expresses sympathy with Russian Jews the fact remains that his support for Islamic terror tactics against Israel follows an old familiar pattern.

The Communist nations of China, Cuba and North Korea remain staunch cheerleaders for Iranian genocidal ambitions and constant critics of Israel’s actions to thwart them. It follows that international groups on the extreme left and governments with neo-communist leaders follow Lemming down the well-trodden path of anti-Israel/Zionist rhetoric and policies.

An increasingly relevant factor in the explosive growth of haters can be seen in the under-thirty age range. This demographic encompasses high school and university students as well as those who have entered the work force and joined political parties or pressure groups.

Some observers seem mystified as to why these so-called educated individuals should be eagerly flocking in large numbers to join anarchist-type demonstrations, sit-ins and Israel delegitimization protests. What motivates these people to demonize Israel, Jews and Zionists and yet remain conspicuously silent when faced with the most horrific human rights atrocities in the rest of the world?

The answer is simple yet remains unspoken in today’s woke and politically correct Orwellian environment.

This age group is bereft of any knowledge of history and actual facts. History as a serious subject has been dropped from many educational curricula. Where it is still taught it is superficial, laden with prejudicial themes or emasculated to such an extent that the students graduate totally clueless. That explains why mindless mobs are mouthing meaningless slogans without having the slightest idea of the real and actual facts of the situation. It is a perfect example of mass brainwashing and an identical clone of past Hitler Youth, Communist Red Guards and current North Korean hysterical leader worship.

In the complete absence of any sort of knowledge, these idiots are easy prey for those with a vested interest in manipulating and funding chaos and anarchy. Cluelessness also means that Iran, Hamas and associated terror facilitators can easily promote the most outrageous libels and conspiracy theories against Israel and Zionists. These recycled accusations fall on fertile ground and germinate into full blown hate with very little effort.

The bottom line is a complete and utter failure of education. These historical illiterates have no clue about how Jew hate developed and finally engulfed Jewish communities. They also have a total blank when it comes to the history of the Jewish People and their historical connections to Israel.

Even more serious are those Jewish youth and adults below the age of 30 who have been seduced by poisonous lies and join the haters as they spew their venom. The media, of course, love these self-haters.

Has there been a failure in teaching history in Jewish Day Schools or is this a byproduct of galloping assimilation and detachment from anything Jewish? Holocaust museums and centres have proliferated yet they only touch a minority. In countries where Holocaust studies are not compulsory the ignorance percentage is frighteningly high. These museums are doing their best to educate but if the demographics now on display at universities and elsewhere are anything to go by the prognosis for the future is dire.

What happens when these under thirty’s assume political positions of influence? Will the sane silent majority shun them and decline to vote for them or will the current slippery slope lead to inexorable tragedies. We can already see in some democratic countries where lack of a political backbone is leading. It does not bode well for a tolerant society as far as Jews are concerned.

The UN is a classic example of how quickly the slippery slope can turn lethal.

After the First World War, the League of Nations endorsed the San Remo Agreement whereby all the territory from the “sea to beyond the river” was guaranteed for Jewish settlement. The perfidious British then hacked off part in order to reward its Arab Hashemite friends. In 1947 the UN further emasculated any future Jewish sovereignty by proposing a partition plan thus rewarding those Arabs who had supported Nazi Germany. From 1948 to 1967, Jordan illegally occupied Judea and Samaria as well as half of Jerusalem, thereby banning Jews from praying at the Kotel and other holy sites. Needless to say, not one UN member objected to this travesty.

We have now reached the ludicrous situation whereby the UN consists of a majority of members who are non-democratic, abusers of human rights and outright sponsors and patrons of terror. The organization and its associated bodies are a cesspool of hate against Israel and an enthusiastic participant in each and every attempt to smear the Jewish State’s legitimacy. The worst part is witnessing the moral cowardice of the remaining democracies as they either vote in favour or shamefully abstain whenever an Israel-bashing motion is proposed.

This year, as we celebrate 76 years of sovereignty, we will be cognizant that this independence has been and continues to be achieved at great cost and sacrifice. Israel is the only nation whose continued existence is under constant threat and whose legitimacy is continually challenged.

More than two thousand years of unremitting hate should have taught us some valuable lessons.

Jews have been described as an eternal people who have outlasted all their oppressors.

The rest of the world should take note.

Mark Levin EXPLODES on Biden’s betrayal of Israel

Fox News host Mark Levin sounds off on President Biden’s vow to cut off weapons aid to Israel if PM Benjamin Netanyahu moves forward with Rafah invasion on ‘Hannity.’

Dr Phil’s Exclusive Interview with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Dr. Phil sits down with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, for an in-depth interview. Join us as we discuss the war between Isreal and Hamas and how it has made an impact on the United States. Don’t miss this exclusive conversation.

 

Dead Hostages Same As Live Ones In Hamas Proposal Coordinated With CIA Director

The New York Times reports that the Hamas hostage proposal was made in
coordination with CIA Director Burns.

KAN has posted a copy of the Hamas proposal (it is in Arabic)
http://www.kan.org.il/content/kan-news/politic/746205/

The offer says that in the first stage 33 hostages “living or dead” will be
released.

CIA Director Burns knows damn well that It takes considerable resources to
keep hostages alive.

So when CIA Director Burns “coordinated” this offer and he and the rest of
the Americans involved told the world media that there were only “minor
differences” between the Hamas offer and the proposal which had in fact been
on the table (LIVE HOSTAGES) he sent a simple message:

As far as the United States is concerned Hamas can slaughter the hostages
who are still alive.

WHY ISN’T THIS THE HEADLINE AROUND THE WORLD?????
________________________________________
IMRA – Independent Media Review and Analysis

Since 1992 providing news and analysis on the Middle East with a focus on
Arab-Israeli relations

The Assault: A Coordinated Attack on America’s Jews and Israel

Many of my readers and former students have expressed frustration in the “depressing” manner in which I have interpreted current Jewish political news. Indeed, my messaging is often framed in a problematic context, sadly reflecting the state of Jewish and public affairs.

Read full article