On Election Day, Biden-Harris Admin Quietly Waived Terrorism Sanctions on Palestinian Government, Docs Show

Just before Tuesday’s presidential election, the Biden-Harris administration quietly waived mandatory terrorism sanctions on the embattled Palestinian government—even as it determined that the government’s leaders are paying imprisoned terrorists and fomenting violence in breach of U.S. law.

The State Department, in a non-public notice to Congress, determined that the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) are not complying with agreements to curb terrorism against Israel and end the “pay-to-slay” program, which rewards imprisoned terrorists for committing acts of violence.

Those violations should trigger American sanctions, barring members of the Palestinian government from obtaining U.S. visas. The Biden-Harris administration nonetheless used its executive power to waive the sanctions.

“A blanket denial of visas to PLO members and PA officials, to include those whose travel to the United States to advance U.S. goals and objectives, is not consistent with the U.S. government’s expressed willingness to partner with the PLO and PA leadership,” the State Department told Congress in the private notification obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

The agency issued the waiver just as Americans headed to the polls Tuesday to hand Donald Trump a decisive victory driven in part by the former president’s clear-cut commitment to Israel’s security amid a broadening regional war. The waiver enables the Palestinian government to duck American sanctions for another 180 days, at which point it will come up for renewal once Trump is in the White House.

Most notably, the State Department determined the Palestinian government “continued to make payments to the families of prisoners convicted of committing acts of terrorism and the families of individuals who were wounded or died while committing acts of terrorism, whom they dubbed ‘martyrs.’”

The terrorist payment program has long been a flashpoint in U.S. relations with the Palestinians. Congress passed a law in 2018 prohibiting economic aid unless those payments are ended, but the Biden-Harris administration has skirted the law while in office, enabling millions of dollars to flow into projects bolstering the Palestinian government. The administration simultaneously pumped millions of dollars into the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip—even as officials privately warned of “a high risk Hamas could potentially derive indirect, unintentional benefit from U.S. assistance to Gaza.”

During the reporting period, which covers April 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023, the Palestinian government “continued to utilize post office branches in the West Bank and Gaza to facilitate payments to prisoners and families of ‘martyrs,’” also in violation of Israeli laws.

“Senior PA/PLO officials publicly defended the payments and criticized Israel’s withholding of clearance and tax revenues, which Israel claimed were withheld in an amount equivalent to prisoner/’martyr’ payments made by the PA,” according to the State Department.

The Palestinian government prioritized payments to terrorists in the face of a massive budget shortfall driven by lagging investments from Western nations. The PA owes more than $6 billion for past loans, putting it in a “deep and substantial financial crisis,” but continues to pump millions into its “pay-to-slay” program.

An earlier State Department report showed the Palestinian government allocated more than $150 million to imprisoned terrorists in 2019, with another $191 million given to the families of terrorists who were “martyred” while attacking Israel.

Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas was also found to have incited violence against Israel during the reporting period, violating U.S. agreements that should trigger sanctions.

Abbas, the State Department said, “stoked outrage after news broke that he had delivered a speech featuring antisemitic tropes in late August. The comments included claims that Ashkenazi Jews were not descended from ancient Israelites and that Hitler murdered Jews in the Holocaust because of their ‘role in society, which had to do with money.’”

Still, the Biden-Harris administration determined that Abbas remains committed to “nonviolence, a two-state solution, and previous PLO commitments, including recognition of the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace.”

Shlomo Carlebach on his 30th yaarzeit

I met Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach when  I was 10 years old.

Our  Hebrew school teacher in Philadelphia brought him to sing for our fifth grade class.

It was more than singing that concerned our teacher.

Our teacher had become a devotee of Chabad-Lubavich and was concerned while we were Jewish in our fifth grade class in Philadelphia, he was concerned that we really know too much about Judaism.

He wanted to excite us and we had a special request.

The special request was that Christmas was coming  and we were always forced to sing Christmas carols in public school and we wanted to learn some Jewish songs.

All we knew was Hava Nagila and Zoom Gali Gali.

So he brought us Shlomo Carlebach to teach to teach us a couple sessions He taught us Borchi Nafshi, Vechulom Mekablim, Essa Einai,  were very nice songs.

But more than that he got a spirit into us, which was very important.

To sing with our soul. Over the years I got to know him and all kinds of different contexts.

When I worked with youth, I would bring Shlomo to work with me.

A month before he died, Shlomo  spent Shabbat near us in Efrat where we live. I brought my then 12 year old son, Noam, to meet Shlomo to ask him if he would be the cantor when Noam would soon become Bar Mitzvah. Shlomo ready agreed. And then it occurred to me In my 34 years of knowing Shlomo, I had never asked him a  question. How do you get started?

I got the answer. Perhaps this was the last interview with Shlomo

Shlomo  told got involved with all this outreach.

He mentioned that his father brought him to a DP camp after World War II, where they organized an improvised Succah for  people from the DP camps who had survived the concentration camps. It  was a very exciting week  of Succot. During that stse holiday, a distressed man  stood outside , screaming at the succah, even throwing rocks, very upset about what was going on.

At the end of Sukkot, Shlomo approached the   distressed follow   in the DP camp who had disrupted the sukkah and asked him:  Why didn’t you come in? He said that he  stood outside the sukkah because at no one  asked him  to come in.

Shlomo said that he  realized that he made a mistake that would carry him  for his entire  life.

Shlomo  said that he must  not be  like  Job, who was very hospitable and known for his hospitality, and wait for people to come and see you.

Shlomo said that it was then that he understood then that you must be  like Abraham and sit outside of the tent event and bring people in. And that is the how Shlomo learned his first lesson of outreach.

Unless you invite people to come in, they will stay away.

That distressed man in the DP camp helped Shlomo start  h**is career which became a legacy.

Shlomo would not make it to Noam’s Bar Mitzvah. I once asked Noam what e remembered from that encounter. “He kissed me on my forehead. I never forgot that”

Excerpted from DAVID BEDEIN’s forthcoming book, FIFTY ENCOUNTERS IN FIFTY YEARS

 

Blame games

Demonstrators at the annual al-Quds day march in Berlin. (Photo: Montecruz Foto)

It can be claimed with nearly 100% certainty that no People/Nation has been blamed more often for more baseless reasons than the Jews.

From the dawn of Jewish history, which we started to read about in our weekly Torah portions this week, right up until the latest news headlines circulating in the media, the blame game continues unabated.

Mutating in every generation, this compulsive urge to blame Jews for each and every evil in society has survived all attempts to combat and eradicate it. Rational logic would have predicted that following the Shoah and genocides associated with that period any vestige of irrational hate might have been purged from the infected masses.

Unfortunately, this virus cannot be suppressed, and that is why, despite years of attempted educational enlightenment and millions spent on memorials and museums, “blame the Jews” has made a spectacular comeback.

At first, those accusing Jews of modern-day blood libels tried to hide their hate behind a façade of anti-Zionism. This only fooled those who wanted to avoid the obvious for a short time. Now we are faced with full-blown Jew hate of the original lethal kind. It has emerged from the sewers worldwide precisely because those engaged in the Israel, Zionist, Jew blame game know that there will be no serious consequences for their actions.

The axis of evil nations support, fund and spread this tsunami. They are aided and abetted in this campaign by corrupted international organizations which have been subverted and neutered. In the face of a moral collapse and blatant falsehoods by most of the diminishing democracies, Jews and the Jewish State are branded guilty of almost every sin known to humanity.

In the not-so-distant past, outbreaks of diseases that decimated swathes of European countries were blamed on Jewish communities.

These libels were swiftly followed by devastating pogroms and massacres. Even well before the advent of social media and modern forms of communication, somehow, the notion that Jews were responsible for plagues and similar disasters spread tsunami-like throughout the continent and even beyond it.

Nowadays, updated versions of these slanders spread in an instant are facilitated by willing representatives of so-called legitimate international bodies. Thus, you have officials of UNRWA making wild claims of evil Israel causing mass starvation in Gaza, which will result in the alleged genocide of the local population. Intentionally ignored and indeed deliberately distorted is the plain fact that the vast majority of aid, whether food or materials, is hijacked by Hamas terrorists. The obvious facts are covered up In a frenzy to brand Israel and, by extension Jews, as complicit in deliberate starvation tactics.

Having been tarred with heinous accusations the mud sticks and no amount of facts and realties will expose the truth to those who think they know everything there is to learn about the perfidious IsraelisThe default position of international funders is to ignore the fact that UNRWA has perpetuated the Arab refugee scandal for more than seven decades. During this time it has inculcated generations of Arabs in their schools with hatred of Jews and Israel. The normal reaction from the international community is to turn a blind eye to UNRWA schools and clinics hosting Hamas terror tunnels and being complicit in giving sanctuary to those storing and firing rockets from their premises.

Instead of dealing seriously with this situation western countries which fund UNRWA prefer to look the other way. When UNRWA graduates join the terrorists and hostage-takers, denial of responsibility kicks in automatically. Rather than demanding accountability the Governments of New Zealand, Australia, Canada, USA, UK and the EU pour more money into a bottomless bucket and blame Israel for the situation. Listen to the howls of hypocritical rage as Israel finally and belatedly refuses to go along with this charade.

Once upon a time, not so long ago, Jews were accused of deicide. Witnessing the convulsions revolving around Israel declaring UNRWA persona non grata one could believe that once again Jews are guilty of some sort of theological crime. This time, it is over a sacred holy cow that is protected by some sort of saintly status and divinely anointed by the UN.

The same sort of selective blame is also being hurled against Israel over the scandalous failures of an ironically misnamed UN “peace keeping” force stationed in south Lebanon. Created in 1978 to “restore international peace and security and assist the Lebanese Government in restoring its effective authority in the area” this force has failed spectacularly in enforcing its UN mandated objectives. One of its most vital tasks was the withdrawal of terror groups from the area and ensuring that they did not create any threat to Israeli civilians living across the border.

More than forty years later, UNIFIL has not only failed miserably to achieve any of its objectives but has also now been exposed as complicit with Hezbollah in facilitating the establishment of a terror infrastructure intended to murder Israelis. Far from restoring Lebanese Government authority in the area the opposite has actually occurred. Lebanon has been subverted by Iran and its proxy terror representatives while the UN force has been relegated to a compliant group which sees nothing, hears nothing and pretends that they are keeping a fake peace.

During their watch, Hezbollah has built an extensive network of terror tunnels, established storage facilities in homes, hospitals, mosques and schools for rockets, missiles, drones and ammunition. Over a period of four decades under the very noses of UNIFIL which claimed that nothing was amiss, the terrorists prepared the infrastructure for an October 7 type invasion of northern Israel and subsequent massacres. This has been clearly and unambiguously revealed as the IDF discovers and demolishes these sites and continues to clear out the terror network embedded in south Lebanon.

Not to be overlooked is the stark reality that also, over this period, Hezbollah has amassed, with the help of Iran, hundreds of thousands of lethal rockets, missiles and drones. Thousands have been fired at Israeli civilians on a daily basis since 7 October 2023.

For more than 40 years, the UN ignored what was occurring, and UNIFIL continued to be passive bystanders as the terrorist groups openly boasted about their intentions. Israel, no doubt hoping that eventually the UN might act also did nothing to sort out this disgraceful situation. As usual when hard decisions are kicked down the road the inevitable fallout has proven worse than ever.

Has the international reaction to all these realties been supportive of Israel’s delayed actions to eliminate the terror threats against it?

Of course, it has been not. The automatic blame game immediately kicks in with a vengeance. One does not expect those countries supporting Tehran such as China, Russia, North Korea and cheer leaders for jihadist terror such as Spain and Ireland to issue messages of solidarity with Israel. One certainly does not expect the UN and its associated bodies to admit their abject failures and so it has proven.

The least we could expect from our democratic friends is some sort of wholehearted support and understanding especially now that the sordid details of Hezbollah’s tactics have been revealed.  Unfortunately this has proven to be a forlorn hope. Expressions of tepid acknowledgment have been hedged with the usual barrage of moral equivalence and double standards. The reaction of New Zealand’s Foreign Minister is typical of how moral cowardice and unwillingness to condemn UN failures combine. His statement that “Israeli action against UN peacekeepers is unacceptable” encapsulates the sordid collapse of a will to stand against jihadist terror which is now a feature of international blame policies against the Jewish State.

On 9 November, Jewish communities worldwide will once again commemorate the anniversary of Kristallnacht, the night of broken glass when Synagogues, Jewish businesses and homes in Germany & Austria were attacked and burnt down. It also marks the rounding up of Jews (my grandfather among them) and their deportation to Dachau.

As a prelude to the implementation of the “final solution” it stands out as a stark reminder of the catastrophic failure by the League of Nations and democratic countries to counter and prevent the genocidal campaign against the Jews which had already started in 1933. Five years of inaction and appeasement convinced the Nazis that they could get away with mass murder and the refusal of nations to grant sanctuary to fleeing Jewish refugees merely confirmed that nobody cared about the fate of Jews and other “undesirables.”

As speakers this year intone the usual platitudes it should be made plain that history is once again repeating itself. Just as the League of Nations failed, so is the United Nations. The same refusal that saw Nazi Germany and its willing band of helpers facilitating the destruction of Jews now manifests itself in a refusal by democratic countries today in taking down Iranian plans to destroy Israel. Hitler and his gangsters made no secret of their ultimate intentions. The mullahs of the Islamic Republic of Iran likewise are open about their ambition to wipe the Jewish State off the world map.

Instead of helping to thwart Nazi goals the Chamberlain UK Government and the Roosevelt Administration cautioned Jews to stay quiet and lie low. Today’s successors blame Israel for fighting back and refusing to be sacrificial lambs.

Politicians love to eulogize dead Jews without accepting any responsibility for their predecessors’ failed actions.

It is time to put the blame where it rightfully should be placed and defeat terror before it is once again too late.

New UNRWA laws enacted by the Israel Knesset Parliament: lethal and dangerous.

The Plenary Hall during the swearing-in ceremony of the 24th Knesset, at the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, April 6, 2021. Photo by Alex Kolomoisky/POOL ***POOL PICTURE, EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES, PLEASE CREDIT THE PHOTOGRAPHER AS WRITTEN - ALEX KOLOMOISKY/POOL*** *** Local Caption ***
ëðñú
áçéøåú
ôúéçú îåùá
çáøé ëðñú çãùéí
îùîø äëðñú
äùáòä
è÷ñ
24

While  new  UNRWA laws enacted by Israel will close the Unrwa offices in Jerusalem and curtail the one unrwa refugee facility in Jerusalem , the new Israel UNRWA laws mandate  that the 58 unrwa refugee facilities outside of Jerusalem will   now now function without any Israel involvement , which means that the Unrwa curriculum of war continues unabated.

Groups such as  J ST which support UNRWA in its current pro-terror policies can  be arrested and imprisoned under current US law which mandates severe criminal action against any US citizen who aids and abet those who function  as an FTO. a foreign terrorist organization.

A constructive role for Unrwa to play would be to adopt five principles of the UNRWA Peace initiative at

https://israelbehindthenews.com/2023/05/16/unrwa-donors-can-adopt-a-new-unrwa-peace-initiative  , Located on our home page: Israelbehindthenews.com

This week, our agency will press charges of incitement to murder against those  who run UNRWA .

 UNRWA HAS IMMUNITY.  UNRWA WORKERS FACE  NO  IMMUNITY FROM CRIMINAL  CHARGES

Hezbollah targets Tel Aviv in volley to central Israel

Rocket sirens sounded across central and northern Israeli communities in cities including Tel Aviv, Netanya, Ramat Gan, Herzliya and others. Alarms also sounded in cities located in the Upper Galilee region and Nahariya. According to initial reports, one rocket fell inside Ben Gurion Airport’s parking lot without injuries.

The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit reported shortly after the volley that 10 rockets were seen crossing from Lebanon to Israel with some being intercepted by the Israeli Air Force.
The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit reported shortly after the volley that 10 rockets were seen crossing from Lebanon to Israel with some being intercepted by the Israeli Air Force.

The Unknown Role of the German Government in Nurturing a Mein Kampf Curriculum

Thanks to the quiet freeze on American funds to UNRWA*, Germany, which presents itself as a democratic power, is now the leading donor state of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which services descendants of Palestinian refugees of the 1948 war
* https://israelbehindthenews.com/2023/04/21/financial-crisis-in-unrwa-why/of

58% of the current UNRWA budget is allocated to schools which indoctrinate Arab children to make war on Jews.

Please see our new movie UNRWA at War * https://israelbehindthenews.com/2023/04/21/financial-crisis-in-unrwa-why/ and our new study of the active role of UNRWA in the current war https://israelbehindthenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/p14-17.pdf

A recent tabulation of donations from UNRWA donor nations can be found here:

https://www.unrwa.org/how-you-can-help/government-partners/funding-trends

As such, Germany shoulders a responsibility to assure the people of Germany and the Jewish people that their money is not channeled in a non-peaceful direction. Yet, leading German government-funded foundations aid UNRWA with no conditions. https://israelbehindthenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/German-Legacy-Under-Chancellor-Merkel.pdf

A straightforward way to accomplish the above is to check what the textbooks issued by the Palestinian Authority and used in UNRWA schools, say about the Israeli/Jewish “other” and about the issue of peace with that “other”.

More than 1,000 UNRWA texts have now been examined by three journalists with PhDs in Islamic Studies.

https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/app/uploads/2024/05/E_114_24.pdf

It is imperative that an effort be made to provide this information in the German language.

Schoolbooks are the most revealing source of information regarding the values and aspirations a society seeks to instill in its youth.

Following a protracted state of war, these texts serve as a reliable indicator of the existence, or non-existence, of peace education.

The Oslo Accord signed by the State of Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) in 1993 opened a new phase in the Middle East in which both parties were supposed to advance towards a peaceful solution of that war.

In 1994, the Palestinian Authority (PA) was established by the PLO to rule the West Bank and the Gaza Strip which, until then, were fully administered by Israel.

The PA assumed most governmental powers in those areas, including education. In 2000, it started issuing its own schoolbooks in a process that lasted until 2006. A newer set of PA schoolbooks was published between the years 2016-2018.

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for the 1948 Palestinian refugees and their descendants, which has been operating in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza (as well as in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon) since 1950, use the PA books in its schools. UNRWA, as a UN agency, is bound by the UN-endorsed principle of resolving all conflicts peacefully, as well as by UNESCO principles of peace education As a UN agency, all UN agencies should treat all member states equally, including the State of Israel.

It is imperative for decision-makers in Germany to know whether the PA textbooks used in UNRWA schools (as well as in all other schools in Jerusalem, judea, Samaraa and Gaza) advocate peace — or, instead, call for an armed struggle –, recognize the existence of Israel as a sovereign state in the region and the presence of its seven million Jews in the country as well as their holy places there, treat Jewish/Israeli individuals as they would other human beings, renounce terrorist activity against civilians, employ self-criticism in this regard, and so on.

It is incumbent upon Germany, more than any other nation, to exercise extreme care while dealing with issues closely connected to the wellbeing of the citizens of the Jewish State.

NOW PREPARING A PROPOSAL TO UNCOVER THE UNKNOWN ROLE OF THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT IN NURTURING AN UNPRECEDENTED PALESTINIAN MEIN KAMPF CURRICULUM.

The fate of the two state solution following the US elections

The idea of a  two state solution  will no doubt be high on the agenda of the new US administration, following Saudi demands for a Palestinian state as a condition for an  upgrade in Saudi relations with Israel.

Here are ten dilemmas posed by a Palestinian  State which are  too often swept under the rug, followed by 10 questions which  Middle East policy makers too often forget to ask.

  1. Encirclement: Would a proposed state of Palestine not swallow up Jordan, most of whose population is Palestinian, leaving Israel with a hostile state from the Iraqi border to the Mediterranean Sea, with a corridor across the Negev between Gaza to Hebron? 
  2. Israeli Arabs: Would the Arabs of the Galilee and the Negev not sue to join the Palestinian Arab state and then demand the fulfillment of U.N. Resolution 181 – an Israeli withdrawal to the 1947 borders (evacuation of Nahariya, Acre, Nazareth, Jaffa, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Kiryat Gat and Beer Sheva)? 
  3. .Terror: Would a new Palestinian Arab entity disband terrorist organizations? We asked this question before the Oslo process imported the PLO in 1993, which has never renounced terrorism or violence as a ans to liberate all of Palestine. 
  4. Armament: Why would there be any expectation that a sovereign Palestine be demilitarized, since all nation states maintain an armed force as an integral aspect of their new nation? 
  5. Refugees: How would Israel deal with expectations of the Arab countries and UNRWA residents who continue to demand that Israel must absorb descendants of Arab refugees and thereby displace thousands of Israelis from places like Haifa, Tfzat and Jaffa and 80 kibbutzim which rest on the property of Arab villages where Arabs left in 1948? 
  6. Air space: Would the Israeli Air Force be forbidden from flying over a new Palestinian Arabstate? 
  7. Alliances: What would prevent a Palestinian state from concluding military agreements with countries still at war with Israel?
  8. Water: Would a sovereign Palestine not carry out pirate drilling, and threaten the mountain aquifer of Judea and Samaria?
  9. Jewish sovereignty: Would the momentum for a Palestinian Arab state not erase the momentum of the right of the Jews to the Land of Israel in international consciousness?
  10. Loss of independence: Would Israel not become a subject to the sponsors of a Palestinian Arab state – today, known as the Quartet – the U.S., the EU, the U.N. and Russia?

All this leads to questions which  Middle East policy makers should therefore  ask about a  Palestinian state

  1. Will you ask the Palestinians to recognize the Jewish state of Israel? 
  2. Will you demand that  the Palestinians finally ratify the “Declaration of Principles for Peace” signed at the White House in 1993? 
  3. Will you demand that the Palestinians cancel the PLO charter from 1964  that calls  for the extermination of the Jewish State? 
  4. Will you demand that the Palestinians cancel their unprecedented law from 2015 which assures a salary for life for anyone who murders a Jew?
  5. Will you demand cancellation of the new PA and UNRWA school curriculum, based on Jihad, martyrdom and “right of return by force of arms”?
  6. Will you demand the removal of weapons from PA and UNRWA schools?
  7. Will you insist that UNRWA dismiss employees affiliated with Hamas, Islamic Jihad or Fatah terror organizations?
  8. Will  you introduce UNHCR standards to advance resettlement of fourth- and fifth-generation refugees from the 1948 war who have spent seven decades relegated to refugee status? Current UNRWA policy is that any Arab refugee resettlement would interfere with a purported “right of return” to pre-1948 Arab localities.
  9. Will you demand an audit of donor funds that emanate from 68 nations for the PA and UNRWA, with little transparency?
  10. Given the active participation of the Palestine Security Force (PSF) in the current war, will you demand that the US cease its support of the PSF?

Partisan organisations such as United Nations Relief and Works Agency are an obstacle to peace

Would you find it conceivable that an entire UN agency was created to perpetuate a conflict rather than solve it? Would it sound reasonable to you that a UN agency would knowingly pay salaries to terrorists? Would you agree to donate money to an organisation whose teachers educate to kill and abduct people and whose employees are recorded abducting innocent people? Does it sound reasonable that the intelligence branch of a terrorist organisation is embedded under a UN facility that feeds it with electricity and communications? That terrorists use UN institutions like schools and hospitals? That terrorists steal humanitarian assistance and use it to extort and control the population?

The answer to these questions is pretty clear to any reasonable person. However, believe it or not, this is the reality in West Asia with an organisation called the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). While Israel successfully absorbed 800 thousand Jewish refugees from the Arab world who were never compensated by anyone for the property left behind nor the loss of their livelihoods, 700 thousand Arabs who had to flee following the attempt of seven Arab armies to destroy the newly established Israel in 1948 received a completely different treatment. UNRWA was formed to perpetuate their status as “refugees” and never allow them to normalise their lives unless they manage to reverse the results of 1948.

That’s exactly what UNRWA is doing. With tens of billions of dollars so far in financing, it educates millions of Palestinian descendants that they shouldn’t rebuild their lives in the places they reside. Many of them were denied citizenship in the places they live in and where their children were born, like in Lebanon, for example, where they are denied not only citizenship but also banned from owning land or from practising certain professions. And even in those places where citizenship was granted to them, like in Jordan, they are still illegally entitled to refugee status which contradicts UNHCR rules. Instead of helping people to settle in, it educates them to go back to the places their ancestors had to leave four generations ago.

Unfortunately, UNRWA has been “successful” in fulfilling its mandate to the extent that millions of graduates from its schools have been taught to object to Israel’s existence for the last 76 years. Many of them became active members of terrorist organisations. No institution has been doing that “better” than the UNRWA schools in Gaza, where Hamas took over in 2007, where the teachers’ union is controlled by Hamas and many of its teachers are leaders in the Hamas terrorist organisation. Or, in Lebanon, where the leader of Hamas was in charge of educating 39,000 children, and the UN refused to fire him. Israel has presented multiple evidence to the UN on many occasions. Most of it was completely ignored.

Yesterday the overwhelming majority of the Israeli parliament said: Enough is enough. Israel will no longer cooperate with UNRWA. The legislation gives the government 90 days to make necessary arrangements to ensure humanitarian assistance to needy Palestinians — cynically used as pawns to advance political goals — are extended through other UN agencies and NGOs. Israel will continue to facilitate international assistance to this Palestinian population. We will continue to abide by international law. But we will not agree to continue to cooperate with UNRWA, a corrupt organisation that is completely compromised by terrorist organisations like Hamas. Their sole reason for existence is to eradicate the State of Israel. Israel calls all parties interested in de-escalating the conflict in the West Asian region to dissociate themselves from UNRWA in order to advance and secure peace and stability in our region.

The writer is Israel’s Ambassador to India

Lies, Truth, and the Moral Compass of Holocaust Education

Reflecting on my time as a tour guide at the burnt vehicles compound, where remnants of cars destroyed on October 7th stand as stark reminders of recent horrors, I witnessed firsthand how the truth is often obscured by lies. Recently, while reviewing a list of scheduled groups, I noticed one titled “Denial of Nova.” My stomach turned. Were they coming to listen or to argue? Would I encounter open minds or hostility? Ultimately, they did not arrive — after an earlier meeting with a survivor, where they allegedly accused him of lying, their visit was canceled. This experience reminded me of how crucial it is to stand up for the truth, especially in an era when lies can be accepted with alarming ease.

Adi Rabinowitz Bedein speaks at the burnt vehicles compound in southern Israel, containing remnants of cars destroyed on October 7th.

We live in a challenging age for truth. As Holocaust educators, we face a mission that extends beyond conveying historical facts — we are engaged in a struggle against a postmodern relativism that argues that “truth” is flexible. Recently, I met a Jewish woman at a protest where I spoke in Vancouver. She perceived the slogan “From the river to the sea” as their “story,” revealing a troubling shift — lies, when unchecked, can become legitimate as “alternative truths.”

This protest was part of a broader journey I’m undertaking with my family, “Agents of Hope,” where we are traveling independently for a year throughout North and Central America, engaging with Jewish and Christian communities. Everywhere I go, I bring the story of October 7th through the lens of a Holocaust educator, sharing the urgency of combating misinformation and fostering a true understanding of tragedies, both past and present.

Adi Rabinowitz Bedein speaks at a rally in Vancouver, Canada.

This is what makes the position of institutions like the Lemkin Institute — named after Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term “genocide” — so troubling. The institute condemned Israel for supposedly committing “genocide in Gaza,” a statement that betrays Lemkin’s legacy. Lemkin, a Jewish scholar who lost his family in the Holocaust, created the term to highlight the genocide inflicted upon Jews and others by Nazi Germany.

Yet today, this term is distorted to support narratives that overlook the clear intentions of Hamas towards the Jewish people — a group that has repeatedly expressed its desire to annihilate the Jewish population. October 7th was a clear manifestation of this chilling intent, and the indoctrination of Palestinian children toward these goals is a fact, not just a perspective. When institutions designed to preserve and teach the truth about genocide distort it, they endorse and validate lies that put lives at risk, and they undermine moral clarity.

In the context of Holocaust education, I often encounter educators who believe Holocaust centers should serve as bridges between cultures. While the intent may be noble, I have heard arguments suggesting that they avoid discussing Israel to foster these connections. However, I challenge this notion. In a world where genocide centers teach about “the genocide in Gaza,” perhaps it is better for them not to invoke the memory of the Holocaust at all. Holocaust education is primarily about preventing harm to Jews — and, by extension, Israelis — while combating antisemitism.

Today, one cannot separate antisemitism from the war in Israel — the connection is all too evident, especially as protests against Israel reach the doors of Holocaust centers. This troubling reality reinforces my commitment at the Network for Innovative Holocaust Education (NIHE), where I have integrated a monthly focus on contemporary antisemitism into our programming. Holocaust educators today need the courage and support to address current issues and express their messages in the most authentic way. If we shy away from discussing the connection between antisemitism and the attacks on Israel, we jeopardize the opportunity for a distorted use of history to become the dominant narrative.

A friend of mine, the father of a young man who sacrificed his life to save others at the Nova festival, regularly visits the burnt vehicles compound with a message that, unfortunately, sounds like a cliché but is profoundly strong — he calls for unity. He urges people to talk to one another, even if they disagree on political matters. This call resonates with a lesson I learned from the late Rabbi Jonathan Sacks — morality is the “we” in “I,” the vital thread that connects us all. Without it, truth loses its foundation, and we risk being isolated, adrift without a shared moral compass.

Silence is not an option. This work has shown me time and again that speaking the truth is not just about sharing facts — it is about anchoring ourselves to a shared morality, insisting that facts matter, and pushing back against a tide that says otherwise. Lies hold power, yes, but so does standing firm in the truth. Holocaust education is not merely a recounting of history; it is a call to moral action, a rejection of the insidious effects of lies, and a continuous struggle for a world where truth is a thing we can believe in.

Adi Rabinowitz Bedein, is a Holocaust educator from Israel, Yad Vashem tour guide, and founding director of the Network for Innovative Holocaust Education (NIHE).

An Obstacle to Peace

WOULD YOU FIND IT conceivable that an entire UN agency was created to perpetuate a conflict rather than solve it? Would it sound reasonable to you that a UN agency would knowingly pay salaries to terrorists? Would you agree to donate money to an organisation whose teachers educate to kill and abduct people and whose employees are recorded abducting innocent people? Does it sound reasonable that the intelligence branch of a terrorist organisation is embedded under a UN facility that feeds it with electricity and communications? That terrorists use UN institutions like schools and hospitals? That terrorists steal humanitarian assistance and use it to extort and control the population?

The answer to these questions is pretty clear to any reasonable person. However, believe it or not, this is the reality in West Asia with an organisation called the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). While Israel successfully absorbed 800 thousand Jewish refugees from the Arab world who were never compensated by anyone for the property left behind nor the loss of their livelihoods, 700 thousand Arabs who had to flee following the attempt of seven Arab armies to destroy the newly established Israel in 1948 received a completely different treatment. UNRWA was formed to perpetuate their status as “refugees” and never allow them to normalise their lives unless they manage to reverse the results of 1948.

That’s exactly what UNRWA is doing. With tens of billions of dollars so far in financing, it educates millions of Palestinian descendants that they shouldn’t rebuild their lives in the places they reside. Many of them were denied citizenship in the places they live in and where their children were born, like in Lebanon, for example, where they are denied not only citizenship but also banned from owning land or from practising certain professions. And even in those places where citizenship was granted to them, like in Jordan, they are still illegally entitled to refugee status which contradicts UNHCR rules. Instead of helping people to settle in, it educates them to go back to the places their ancestors had to leave four generations ago.

Unfortunately, UNRWA has been “successful” in fulfilling its mandate to the extent that millions of graduates from its schools have been taught to object to Israel’s existence for the last 76 years. Many of them became active members of terrorist organisations. No institution has been doing that “better” than the UNRWA schools in Gaza, where Hamas took over in 2007, where the teachers’ union is controlled by Hamas and many of its teachers are leaders in the Hamas terrorist organisation. Or, in Lebanon, where the leader of Hamas was in charge of educating 39,000 children, and the UN refused to fire him. Israel has presented multiple evidence to the UN on many occasions. Most of it was completely ignored.

Yesterday the overwhelming majority of the Israeli parliament said: Enough is enough. Israel will no longer cooperate with UNRWA. The legislation gives the government 90 days to make necessary arrangements to ensure humanitarian assistance to needy Palestinians — cynically used as pawns to advance political goals — are extended through other UN agencies and NGOS. Israel will continue to facilitate international assistance to this Palestinian population. We will continue to abide by international law. But we will not agree to continue to cooperate with UNRWA, a corrupt organisation that is completely compromised by terrorist organisations like Hamas. Their sole reason for existence is to eradicate the State of Israel. Israel calls all parties interested in de-escalating the conflict in the West Asian region to dissociate themselves from UNRWA in order to advance and secure peace and stability in our region.

With tens of billions of dollars so far in financing, it educates millions of Palestinian descendants that they shouldn’t rebuild their lives in the places they reside. Many of them were denied citizenship in the places they live in and where their children were born, like in Lebanon, for example, where they are denied not only citizenship but also banned from owning land or from practising certain professions.