Israeli Army Kills Islamic Jihad Leader

Israeli troops, intelligence agents and border police, acting in a joint operation, killed an important Islamic Jihad leader Sunday night.

The leader, identified as Jihad Nawahada, 23, an al-Quds Brigades’ member, had been on Israel’s most wanted list for a long time. He was killed in the operation, which occurred in the village al-Yamoun, lying just to the west of Jenin on the West Bank.

Mr. Nawahada, according to the reports, had been recently released from a Palestinian prison after having been incarcerated for more than five months by Palestinian forces loyal to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

A Hamas Web site said “during the night, Israeli special forces whose members were disguised as Palestinian civilians infiltrated. It advanced using a Mercedes with Palestinian license plates.”


<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

According to that report, after Mr. Nawahada was positively identified in the street, “he came under intensive fire from the (Israel Defense Forces) IDF special forces, as a result of which he sustained critical injuries. The force kidnapped the boy to an unknown location.”

The Israeli Army spokesperson’s office confirmed the assault, saying troops fired at Mr. Nawahada, hitting him.

“The troops evacuated the wanted man to a hospital in Israel, but the wanted man died of his injuries before he arrived at the hospital,” the office said. “He was released in September from the prison in Jenin, but resumed terrorist activity. He had been wanted for the past number of months because he was planning terror attacks in the Jenin area.”

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com

Olmert To Ask Brown About The UK As A Hamas Sanctuary

Britain’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown, right, greets Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert at 10 Downing Street, London yesterday. (Ian Nicholson/PA/Associated Press)

Until recently, Israeli government spokespersons, in bilateral dealings with the British government, had not publicly made reference to an Israeli intelligence report taking it to task for allegedly providing a safe haven for Hamas.

However, this week, during the visit of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in London, Mr. Olmert’s spokesman, Mark Regev firmly stated, on the record, that the Israeli prime minister would press the issue with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown during his London visit.

In the report, the Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center (IICC) in Herzelia, Israel, considered to he the “public face of Israeli intelligence,” accused the United Kingdom of being a “major source of publishing and distribution of Hamas incitement.”

The IICC report warned Britain allows hate-filled anti-Israel and anti-Western propaganda glorifying suicide terrorism to go unchecked.

<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

“British authorities have yet to take effective action to put an end to the exploitation of their country by Hamas for spreading incitement,” the report said.

The report also said while Hamas’ media is “guided from Damascus and assisted by Arab countries,” its “branch operating in Britain is used for printing and distribution of Hamas publications.”

Prominent among these publications is the monthly Filastin al-Muslimah, Hamas’ major publication since the 1980s, which is available in paper edition and on the Internet.

Spreading incitement and hatred against Israel and the West in the spirit of Hamas’ ideology, it preaches the justice of terrorism and glorifies its perpetrators.

From Britain, it is distributed worldwide in both its online and hard copy editions. To avoid unwanted attention from British security services, Filastin al-Muslimah stopped publishing its address in the United Kingdom on the front page at some point during 2004. However, it is still published in the United Kingdom, openly and with impunity.

Directly associated with the monthly is a London-based publishing house called Filastin al-Muslimah Publications. In the past, the publishing house has printed books commemorating terrorists responsible for planning and initiating suicide attacks. Books on senior figures in the Hamas operative-terrorist wing – such as Salah Shehada, Yahya Ayyash, and Imad Aqel – are typical of the kind of works in which the publishing house specializes.

In this context, one of the major founders of the Filastin al-Muslimah publishing house is Ghassan Daw’ar, hailed by Hamas as “the historian of the intifada” (i.e., the campaign of terrorism against Israel) and “the historian of the shahids” (i.e., suicide bombers). In addition to writing books about Yahya Ayyash and Imad Aqel, two of the most prominent architects of Hamas’ suicide bombings, Mr. Daw’ar also writes articles for Hamas’ main Web site (palestine-info).

In 1999, he was arrested in Jordan with other Hamas leaders. According to the Hamas Web site, the cause of his arrest was his involvement in a committee that objected to the normalization of relations with the “Zionist enemy.” Though it now avoids publishing its address in Britain, the publishing house continues to advocate Hamas’ terrorist cause – apparently without interference from British authorities.

Not all these publications are aimed at adults. For the junior jihadist, there is the online biweekly Al-Fateh.

Combining articles and illustrations, it is geared toward children, whom Hamas considers a highly significant target audience. In particular, al-Fateh is designed to inculcate in children support for radical Islam, violence and terrorism. Al-Fateh is published in London, a fact openly stated on its homepage at www.al-fateh.net.

Al-Fateh’s editor-in-chief and founder is Sami al-Halabi, although according to the report, this is the pen name of Abdallah al-Tantawi, a senior figure in the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood in the mid-1990s (Hamas is the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood).

The IICC report asserts that Hamas’ use of Britain as a major source of publishing and distribution of incitement is “hardly coincidental.” On the contrary, “there are several factors at play: first, the policy of the British government, allowing Hamas (and radical Islamic elements in general) a relative freedom of action on British territory, particularly in the sphere of propaganda; second, the existence of a network of Arab/Muslim supporters in Britain; third, the technical ability to produce high quality publications in Britain and distribute them across the globe.”

The fact that these publications have maintained a presence in the United Kingdom – even after the deadly Islamic attacks on London on July 7, 2005, raises serious security questions – not only for Israel, but for British subjects as well.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

Bus Crash Worst In Israeli History

Israeli rescue workers carry a wounded passenger at the scene of a bus crash near the southern Israeli resort city of Eilat yesterday. At least 26 people were killed and dozens of others seriously injured when a bus of Russian tourists overturned yesterday near the popular Israeli Red Sea resort town of Eilat, rescue services said. (Yehuda Ben Itah/Associated Press)

This year has marked the first year in Israel’s history when no visas were required of tourists who wanted to visit the Jewish state from Russia.

As a result, at least 300,000 Russian tourists have flown into the southern Israeli port city of Eilat over the past year, making Eilat one of the greatest attractions in the world for Russian tourists.

In that context, travel agents from throughout Russia gathered this week in Eilat to convene a conference, in cooperation with the Israel Ministry of Tourism. The conference aimed to plan vacation packages for Russian- speaking tourists who want to visit southern Israel.

On Monday afternoon, 49 Russian-speaking travel agents and tour operators landed at the Ovda airport just north of Eilat. These tourists flew to Israel on a charter flight operated by the Russia company from St. Petersburg, landed in Ovda and departed in two buses in the direction of Eilat.

<!–
AdSys ad not found for top_stories:instory –>

Around about 3 p.m. local time yesterday, one of those buses plunged down a ravine about two miles north of Eilat.

Twenty-six of the Russian bus passengers were killed instantly, and the injured were evacuated to the Yoseftal, Barzilai and Soroka hospitals in southern Israel.

Thirty-three more passengers were injured, 25 of them seriously.

Tourism Minister Ruhama Avraham-Balila, immediately on hearing the news, instructed representatives from the Tourism Ministry to open a “situation room.” A Russian-speaking representative from the Tourism Ministry has answered tens of calls from families seeking information.

The situation room operated in full cooperation with the Foreign Ministry and with the Russian Ambassador to Israel and the Israel Embassy in Moscow.

The Israeli government released the following statement:

“Israel deals with road accidents on a daily basis and, to our sorrow, no week goes by without Israelis and tourists, pedestrians, drivers and passengers, being killed and injured. The number of those killed and injured is high and scarcely conceivable. Even in the shadow of this sad chronicle, today’s accident is exceptional in its severity. It obligates us, especially during the week in which we mark the issue of road safety, to reconsider the culture of driving in Israel, mutual responsibility on the roads and the need to specially train drivers who transport large numbers of people.”

The Israel Ministry of Transportation said a verbal argument between the two bus drivers concerning the “right of way” caused the crash. The driver of the fatal bus, who was only slightly injured in the crash, has been convicted of 22 moving violations. Why he was still a driver on the road will be the subject of debate in the days to come.

Twenty-four fatalities in one crash is the highest figure in Israeli motor vehicle accident history.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

United Nations Human Rights Council Envoy Denied Entry To Israel

In an unprecedented move, Israel has denied an entry visa to Prof. Richard Falk, special rapporteur (envoy) of the United Nations Human Rights Council, and has declared he would be unwelcome in Israel.

Israel previously facilitated Dr. Falk’s visit to Israel in June 2008 in order to attend an academic event.

However, the Israeli government asserts that his “visit was abused by him for the purpose of presenting an imbalanced report before the Third Committee during the 63rd session of the U.N. General Assembly this year.”

In a statement issued by the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “the mandate of this special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories is particularly biased and distorted: not only is it the only Human Rights Council mandate not to have been revised and modified since 1992, it also dictates pre-established conclusions to the report, regardless of any real inquiry and findings by the rapporteur… The mandate also ignores all human rights violations by Palestinians, either against Israelis or against other Palestinians. Thus, the rapporteur is prevented from considering, even if he wanted to, the issue of Human Rights violations by Palestinians”

<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

The statement went even further, with a scathing attack on Dr. Falk’s integrity, saying “beyond the imbalance inherent in his mandate, the bias is further exacerbated by the highly politicized views of the rapporteur himself, in legitimizing Hamas terrorism and drawing shameful comparisons to the Holocaust. In light of his vehement publications in the past, it is hard to square his appointment with the requirements of the council’s own internal procedures which call for the appointment of mandate holders who are impartial, objective and possess the quality of personal integrity.”

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

Israeli Intelligence Community: US Leads Intense Espionage Efforts In Israel

A new book by an Israeli government-financed security agency asserts that the United States has been engaged in human and electronic surveillance of Israel.

The book, titled Masterpiece: An Inside Look at Sixty Years of Israeli Intelligence, asserts that American espionage agencies operate from the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv and target Israelis as well as strategic facilities.

“The United States has been after Israel’s non-conventional capabilities and what goes on at the decision-making echelons,” the book, published by the Israel Intelligence Heritage and Commemoration Center and located on the net at www.intelligence.org.il, said.

<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

The book, containing prefaces written by the heads of Israel’s intelligence community, documents that the United States has focused on the secret the Jewish state’s nuclear program.

In a chapter by retired Israel Security Agency officer Barak Ben-Zur, the book said U.S. intelligence also uses electronic surveillance and other methods to spy on Israeli government meetings.

Mr. Ben Zur was the former head of counterterrorism unit for Israeli military intelligence. He served until recently as the special assistant to the director of the Israeli Security Agency.

This book marks the first time that an official Israeli publication has acknowledged U.S. spy efforts and claims that the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv has a special team to spy on Israel.

Mr. Ben-Zur said the U.S. team has engaged in “methodical intelligence gathering.”

It is not clear as to whether Israeli intelligence would seek to exchange an American intelligence agent in Israel to obtain the release of Jonathan Pollard, an Israeli intelligence agent who has been held in American prisons since 1985.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

Hamas Rally Features Mock Play Of Kidnapped Israeli Soldier

Sunday marked the 21st anniversary founding of Hamas in 1988.

This year, Hamas celebrated the occasion with a rally on Sunday in the central Gaza square near the Islamic University to celebrate the anniversary.

At the peak of the rally, two Hamas actors ascended the podium with loudspeakers blaring, dragging another young Hamas actor who was dressed in an Israeli army uniform.

He fell to his knees, burying his head in his hands and weeping.

<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

“Father, mother, I miss you,” he said in Hebrew, to the laughter of the mass audience.

Applause shook the square in Gaza City.

The show depicting the 2006 kidnapping of Gilad Shalit was intended not only to mock Israel and entertain the Palestinian audience, but to insult every Israeli who waits for the the kidnapped soldier’s return.

The play began with a scene involving a Hamas convict in an Israeli prison and his father awaiting him in Gaza.

While the two were exchanging words of greeting and longing, Hamas operatives in camouflage fatigues and Hamas green hats came on stage holding an actor who played Gilad Shalit.

“What am I doing here? You’re abandoning me,” the “soldier” said in Hebrew. “Father, mother, I send regards. I send regards to Mother and Father. I say to Olmert, why are you delaying [the release] of the soldier, the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.” 


One of the Hamas operatives turned to the actor playing Cpl. Shalit. 
“What will you tell them?” he asked, and the actor replied: “I miss Mother and Father. What am I doing here? I want to return.”

At this stage, the “prisoner” and his father tried to attack “Gilad Shalit,” and the Hamas militiamen protected him.

The organization thereby tried to convey the message that it was keeping the kidnapped soldier safe.

A journalist present at the rally told the Israeli media that at first he was convinced that this was the real Gilad Shalit.

“He looked young like him,” the journalist said. “Our feeling was that Hamas was mocking Israel. The audience enjoyed the show.”

The huge show of force painted Gaza green, the color of Islam.

The large podium was decorated with flowers. On one side stood a large picture of former Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, who was killed by Israeli troops in March 2004, and on the other a picture of Hamas Political Bureau Director Khaled Mashal. In the center was a huge slogan: “Jerusalem, we are coming to you.”

The Hamas rally began with the chilling show about Gilad Shalit, and then came the stage of the speeches.

“Hamas is strong today, in the days of the harsh siege, much more than it was before, because it derives its strength from Allah,” said Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh.

He addressed the outgoing American president: “Bush, you lost, but our weapons did not stop working. You failed, but Hamas did not fall.”

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni was also the object of mockery. “Our answer to 
her,” said Mr. Haniyeh, “will be the Hamas women and the Palestinian women.”

Mr. Haniyeh used the opportunity to announce a series of gestures towards the residents of Gaza, including a 5 percent raise in the salary of teachers and a plan to build a national stadium in Gaza.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

Israelis Downplay Obama’s Offer Of ‘Nuclear Umbrella’

President-elect Barack Obama will offer Israel a “nuclear umbrella” against the threat of nuclear attack by Iran, according to a source close to the new administration who briefed select members of the Israeli media.

Mr. Obama said last Sunday on “Meet The Press” he would negotiate with Iran and would offer economic incentives for Tehran to relinquish its nuclear program.

“What is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?” asked a senior Israeli security source. “What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have] when Iran is nuclear capable?”

A senior Bush administration source said the proposal for an American nuclear umbrella for Israel was ridiculous and lacked credibility.

<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

“Who will convince the citizen in Kansas that the U.S. needs to get mixed up in a nuclear war because Haifa was bombed?” the source asked. “And what is the point of an American response, after Israel’s cities are destroyed in an Iranian nuclear strike?”

The current debate is taking place in light of a recent Israeli military intelligence assessment that Iran has passed beyond the point of no return and has mastered the technology of uranium enrichment.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

‘Bush Legacy’

Tomorrow, the U.N. Security Council, is due to pass a historic resolution that will anchor establishing a Palestinian state in the principles established at the Nov. 2007 Annapolis conference last month’s Sharm el-Sheikh summit.

This will bind the U.N. to compel any future Israeli prime minister to recognize an independent, sovereign Palestinian state.

The policy would also be applied to Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu, an opponent of establishing a Palestinian state, if he should win the coming elections and become prime minister again.

Mr. Netanyahu’s spokesman told The Bulletin, Mr. Netanyahu vehemently opposes anything except “economic peace” with the Palestinians.

<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

In countless appearances over the past 25 years, Mr. Netanyahu has warned that an independent Palestinian state would represent an armed threat to all of Israel – even to Israel’s only international airport.

A Palestinian would have a similar striking distance to Israel’s only international airport as to that existing between Gaza and the Israeli cities of Ashkelon or Sderot. The Hamas government in Gaza has used its de facto independence to fire rockets against the two Israeli cities.

In April 2002, after more than 1,000 Israelis were murdered by Palestinian terrorists who infiltrated Israeli cities, the Israeli military launched Operation Defensive Shield. The Israeli army surrounded almost all Palestinian cities and villages in the West Bank and, by 2007, reduced Palestinian terrorist infiltration into Israeli cities to almost zero.

If Israel were to pull its army out of the areas surrounding Palestinian cities and villages and allow for Palestinian independence, the fear of a Palestinian terror threat to all of Israel likely would return.

However, all indications are that the Bush administration intends to make the U.N. resolution for a Palestinian state binding.

President George W. Bush leave office Jan. 20 and pass the reins to his successor, Barack Obama.

Mr. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice tried to pressure to Israel to agree to recognize an independent Palestinian state by the end of 2008, but without success.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

Israeli Official Visits Cairo With Ultimatum For Hamas

Israel Ministry Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Gilad left this morning for Egypt with an ultimatum for Hamas: If the rocket fire continues, Israel will respond harshly.

The six-month “truce” that Hamas and Israel agreed to in June, with Egyptian mediation, produced something less than a cease-fire.

During these six months, the Israeli Army press spokesman tabulated that the Hamas shelled Israel 367 times from Gaza, with little Israeli military response.

According to Israeli security sources, Maj. Gen. Gilad intends to make it clear to the Egyptian mediators that the violations of the cease-fire were unacceptable and that Israel would begin to respond more forcefully to them.

<!–
AdSys ad not found for news/world:instory –>

If Hamas chooses to persevere with its policy of rocket attacks on Israel, either by means of its own men or by proxy, Israel will cease to consider itself bound by the truce agreement and will revise its military and civilian mode of conduct near the Gaza Strip. 
Similar messages have been passed on in the past to Egypt following mass rocket attacks on Israel. Every time, there has been rocket fire on Israel, Israel has asked Egypt to press Hamas into stopping, but without much success.

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.

Is US Ready To Face Terror Attack?

A U.S. government-financed report asserted that the United States could
face a series of unexpected crises that would rival the al- Qaida terror attacks in
2001, termed a “strategic shock.” The report by the U.S. Army War College’s
Strategic Institute cited the prospect of the collapse of a nuclear state to
massive unrest in the United States.

“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the
defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic
domestic order and human security,” the report, authored by retired Lt. Col.
Nathan Freir, said.

Continued On Page 8 “Deliberate employment of weapons of mass destruction or
other catastrophic capabilities, unforeseen economic collapse, loss of
functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or
insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural
and human disasters are all paths to disruptive domestic shock.”

Titled “Known Unknowns: Unconventional Strategic Shocks in Defense
Strategy Development,” the report warned that the U.S. military and
intelligence community remain mired in the past as well as the need to
accommodate government policy. Lt. Col. Freier, a former Pentagon official, said that
despite the al-Qaida surprise in 2001, U.S. defense strategy and planning
remain trapped by “excessive convention.”

<!–
AdSys ad not found for top_stories:instory –>

“The current administration confronted a game-changing ‘strategic shock’
inside its first eight months in office,” the report said. “The next
administration would be well-advised to expect the same during the course of
its first term. Indeed, the odds are very high against any of the challenges
routinely at the top of the traditional defense agenda triggering the next
watershed inside DoD (Department of Defense).”

The report cited the collapse of what Lt. Col. Freier termed “a large capable
state that results in a nuclear civil war.” Such a prospect could lead to
uncontrolled weapons of mass destruction proliferation as well as a nuclear
war.

The report cited the prospect of a breakdown of order in the United
States. Lt. Col. Freier said the Pentagon could be suddenly forced to recall troops
from abroad to fight domestic unrest.

“An American government and defense establishment lulled into
complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly
divest some or most external security commitments in order to address
rapidly expanding human insecurity at home,” the report said.

The report said the United States could also come under pressure from a
hostile state with control over insurgency groups. Such a hostile state could
force American decisionmakers into a desperate response.

“The United States might also consider the prospect that hostile state
and/or nonstate actors might individually or in concert combine hybrid
methods effectively to resist U.S. influence in a nonmilitary manner,” the
report said. “This is clearly an emerging trend.”

Another scenario was the collapse of what Lt. Col. Freier termed “a large capable
state that results in a nuclear civil war.” Such a prospect could lead to
uncontrolled weapons of mass destruction proliferation as well as a nuclear
war.

“The aforementioned are admittedly extreme,” the report said. “They are
not, however, implausible or fantastical.”

David Bedein can be reached at dbedein@israelbehindthenews.com.