A dangerous lie has taken hold in Washington: that Israel somehow pressured the United States into war with Iran.

It’s wrong. And both President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have said so directly.

When a White House correspondent asked President Trump whether Israel had pulled America into the conflict, he didn’t hesitate. “I might have forced their hand,” he said. “We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first.”

Rubio was equally blunt after a deceptively edited video suggested he believed otherwise: “The president made a decision that negotiations were not going to work… this was a threat that was untenable. The decision was made to strike them.”

Untenable. That word deserves to sit with you for a moment.

Iran has spent years building nuclear weapons, developing long-range ballistic missiles, and encircling Israel with a terror army stretching from Lebanon to Gaza to Yemen. It has fired ballistic missiles directly at Israeli civilians.

No Israeli government — left, right, or center — could ignore that. Jerusalem’s decision to join a combined American-Israeli operation targeting Iran’s missile and nuclear capabilities drew near-universal support across Israel’s political spectrum. This wasn’t Netanyahu’s partisan gamble. It was a national security imperative.

And it was no surprise ambush on America.

When Netanyahu met Trump at Mar-a-Lago last December, reporting indicated the president had already green-lighted an Israeli strike on Iran’s missile infrastructure. When they met again at the White House, that green light held. Washington knew exactly what was coming and decided to lead the war.

The claim that Israel pressured the president of the United States into war is not just factually hollow — it veers dangerously close to the antisemitic fringe narratives about shadowy, unaccountable Jewish power that serious Republicans rightly reject.

But here’s the bigger point that keeps getting buried.

Iran’s missiles and nuclear program and terror are America’s problem.

Those missiles don’t just threaten Israel. They are being fired right now at US forces, American bases, our embassies, and our Gulf Arab allies. Iran is actively developing intercontinental ballistic missiles that could one day reach the American homeland.

This is the same regime that declared war on the United States in 1979 — that has killed and maimed thousands of Americans from Beirut to Baghdad to Kabul, taken Americans hostage, organized assassination and kidnapping plots in America, and armed the terrorist proxies that have American blood on their hands for decades.

Dismantling that regime’s nuclear, missile, and terror infrastructure is not a favor to Israel.

It is core American national security.

Now here’s what Americans should actually understand about the 12-Day War that took place against the regime in Iran in June 2025.

Israel didn’t ask American pilots to do the heavy lifting. For the first 11 days, Israeli aircraft flew deep into Iranian territory — more than a thousand miles from home — dismantling Iran’s air defenses and striking key military targets. No American fighter jets alongside them. No boots on the ground. No American pilots risking their lives over Iranian skies. Israel did that work itself.

Only once Iran’s defenses were shattered did President Trump act. On day eleven, American B-2 bombers struck Fordow — the deeply buried nuclear facility that had long kept American planners up at night. The result was a devastating blow to Iran’s nuclear program.

Dismantling that regime’s nuclear, missile, and terror infrastructure is not a favor to Israel.

It is core American national security.

Now here’s what Americans should actually understand about the 12-Day War that took place against the regime in Iran in June 2025.

Israel didn’t ask American pilots to do the heavy lifting. For the first 11 days, Israeli aircraft flew deep into Iranian territory — more than a thousand miles from home — dismantling Iran’s air defenses and striking key military targets. No American fighter jets alongside them. No boots on the ground. No American pilots risking their lives over Iranian skies. Israel did that work itself.

Only once Iran’s defenses were shattered did President Trump act. On day eleven, American B-2 bombers struck Fordow — the deeply buried nuclear facility that had long kept American planners up at night. The result was a devastating blow to Iran’s nuclear program.

Israel didn’t drag us into this war. It enabled us to fight it smarter, faster, and at far less cost than we ever could have alone.

That’s not pressure. That’s what real partnership looks like.

Mark Dubowitz is CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. FDD is a Washington-based nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy. https://www.fdd.org/

SOURCENew York Post

1 COMMENT

  1. h2>Summary resignation of failed leaker Joe Kent and reaction

    The resignation of Joe Kent as head of the National Counterterrorism Center triggered widespread political reaction centered on U.S. policy toward Iran. Administration response Donald Trump welcomed Kent’s departure, criticizing his view that Iran was not a threat and asserting the opposite. Tulsi Gabbard emphasized that the president determines national security threats and stated that Trump concluded Iran posed an imminent danger requiring action. Kent’s position and resignation Kent resigned amid disagreements with the administration’s approach to Iran, including military action. In his statements, he argued Iran was not a direct threat and suggested U.S. decisions were influenced (supposedly) by Israel. Criticism and allegations The Anti-Defamation League and (even anti-Israel) J Street said his remarks echoed antisemitic conspiracy theories. Rep. Don Bacon supported his resignation and criticized both Iran and antisemitism. Reports also pointed to Kent’s past associations with extremist racist figures and earlier controversies, including election denialism. Reactions within conservative circles Laura Loomer and others accused Kent of inconsistency, citing his prior statements that Iran had threatened Trump following the killing of Qasem Soleimani. Some allies labeled him disloyal or a leaker, with reports claiming he had been excluded from intelligence briefings before resigning. Political reactions Although Democrats had previously opposed Kent’s nomination due to his ties and views, some of them, suddenly promoted his “theories” in their overall anti Trump war. References Eric Mack, Fox News (March 17, 2026): Trump bids goodbye to intel official who resigned over Iran [link] Bill Barrow, Associated Press (via KOAT): What to know about Joe Kent’s resignation [*] Andrew Bernard, JNS (March 17, 2026): US counterterror center head resigns over Iran war [*]
    Marc Rod, Jewish Insider (March 17, 2026): Democrats elevate Kent’s resignation letter [link Times of India (March 18, 2026): Tulsi Gabbard and Joe Kent controversy [link] X (Twitter) posts: @JKash000 (March 17, 2026) [link (*)] Laura Loomer (March 17, 2026) [link (*)]
    Rep. Don Bacon (March 17, 2026) [link (*)] Anti-Defamation League (March 17, 2026)[link (*)] Tulsi Gabbard (March 17, 2026) [link (*)]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Previous articleMojtaba Khamenei Appointed Iran’s Supreme Leader in Defiance of America and Israel
Next articleFalse Flags and Real Agendas