How Henry Kissinger Orchestrated the Yom Kippur War

Aleichem Books, Grass Valley, California
Print ISBN: 978-965-93042-4-0
Digital (eBook) ISBN: 978-965-93042-5-7

Table of Contents

Foreword

Preface

Introduction

Part I – The Gathering Storm

  1. Seeds of Deception
  2. The Calm Before the Orchestrated Storm
  3. The Machiavellian Maestro
  4. The Summit Conspiracy
  5. The Staged War Blueprint
  6. The Price of Illusion

Part II – The Web of Intrigue

  1. Washington’s Web of Silence
  2. Sadat’s Theatrics and the Hidden Hand
  3. Moscow’s Shadow Games
  4. The Betrayal of Warnings
  5. Israel’s Blindfolded Guardians
  6. The Secret Accord
  7. The Kissinger–Dayan Channel
  8. Orders from the Oval Office
  1. Messages Lost—or Concealed?

Part III – The Orchestrated War

  1. October 6, 1973: The Trap is Sprung
  2. Confusion in the Command Centers
  3. A War Meant to Wound, Not Win
  4. The False Resupply Promise
  5. Superpowers on the Chessboard
  6. A Cease-Fire Written in Deceit
  7. The Puppet-Masters of Peace

Part IV – Aftermath and Reckoning

  1. The Secret Diplomacy of Dependence
  2. The Price of American Favor
  3. The Disinformation Campaign
  4. The Silencing of the Whistleblowers
  5. The Paper Victory
  6. The Manipulation of Memory
  7. Revelations from the Shadows
  8. The Reckoning and the Warning

Epilogue – Unmasking the Legacy

Foreword

At the time of the “publication” of his book, HaKesher HaM’ruba, Doron Hakimi used a pseudonym: Hai Doron.

Why is “publication” in quotes and why did Doron use a pseudonym? His and his children’s lives had been threatened: He must withdraw his book from circulation and keep his mouth shut. He had kept quiet now for four and a half decades.

Besides the ever-so detailed accounts he documents in his book, the fact that his life was threatened points to the authenticity of Doron’s accounts. Why would he, now in his 80s, be agreeable to release his book now, and to disclose his real name?

The reason is the same reason that I also decided to release my own disclosures about the Yom Kippur War Surprise (Deceit of an Ally):  those guilty of deceiving Israel back in 1973 are no longer alive or if they are, they’re in a hospice or old-age home.  It is venerable history.

History, yes, but does it have any relevance to current events today? Until October 7, 2023, I would have answered “Clearly, no!” The natural question many ask is, “Was what happened on that unforgettable October 7th day a variation-on-a-theme of what happened 50 years prior on October 6th?

I refer to Doron’s closing words in this book:

The designers of Israeli policy must know that the Jewish people, and especially the State of Israel, have very few true friends around the world and they must strive for peace and prosperity with all the means at their disposal and as quickly as possible, towards its absolute and and unshackled independence in the future for the benefit of future generations.

Doron’s prophetic words could not be timelier, especially with the Trump 20-point Gaza plan unfolding precisely at this very fluid time, October 2025.

Bruce Brill

Preface

With the end of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, and following the bitter outcry that arose among the people after the unexpected security setback, I saw in myself a national duty to thoroughly investigate and discover the actual circumstances that brought the State of Israel, which has one of the best intelligence services in the world, to the military setback upon the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War.

After about four years of collecting material within and outside Israel, my close friends and I concluded, at the end of 1977, that we should organize and publish our discoveries in order to shed light on the dark affair called the Yom Kippur War.

At this opportunity I would like to thank from the bottom of my heart all those friends who played a large and incalculable part in obtaining the information and even those people who knowingly or unknowingly helped me to obtain the essential information for the purpose of writing the book.

Introduction

A principle set forth by the sages of Israel says: “He who comes to kill you, arise and kill him.” However, because of the evolution of the Jewish people among the peoples of the world and because of the hatred of the Gentiles that always burned in the souls of the Jews, the Israelites forgot the laws of their ancestors and fled in exile from the Gentiles who tormented them, abused them, deprived them of their rights and even killed many of them.

As a result of the Jews fleeing from the Gentiles’ abuse, the awareness slowly penetrated the consciousness of the Gentiles in the Diaspora, that the Jews are an inferior people, a cowardice people lacking in resourcefulness; thus, the Jews became the people richest in derogatory epithets, and even their human image became, in the eyes of many, to be subject to doubt.

The events of the Holocaust further strengthened the doubt of the humanity of the Jews.There were even those who believed that the victims of the Holocaust went like sheep to the slaughter. Many asked in bewilderment, how did six million people fall without a hint of defensive reaction? How did they surrender their lives to the hands of their murderers?

However, these and similar questions will never be given a proper answer. Because we did not face that holocaust, but we must not forget that great nations were trampled before the Nazis despite their impressive armies. And here the question arises, what was available to the Jews to rise up against the Nazis, considering their hostile environment, which in many cases strengthened the hand of their Nazi murderers.

Yet, there was actually a positive outcome of the Holocaust:
The Holocaust awoke the Jewish people from a two-thousand-year slumber and instilled in them the realizations that their lives in the Diaspora had come to an end and they must return to the homeland of their ancestors and there be rebuilt.

The Holocaust even verified the verse, that in every generation the Jewish people are in grave danger and in order to continue to exist, they must change their way of life and adopt the teachings of their ancestors and a devotion to national purpose.

Sometimes it seems as if a divine hand desired the Holocaust:  to bring about the return of the Israelites to their homeland and to their national Jewish consciousness that had almost disappeared and been forgotten in exile. Without the lesson of the Holocaust, the Jewish hope that had been upon his lips for two thousand years, “Next year in Jerusalem,” would not have been fulfilled.

Twice we returned to our homeland in similar circumstances, and each time the price was very dear.

Peace education now

President Trump’s Gaza peace plan, adopted by the UN Security Council on November 17, 2025, includes references to a reformed Palestinian Authority that would be able to regain control over the Gaza administration…write David Bedein and Arnon Groiss.

This could serve as a pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood.

Earlier this year, on September 12, the UN General Assembly approved by a large majority a French-Saudi Arabian initiative promoting the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which actually suggests the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a worldwide goal and is also the main core of the 1993-95 Oslo Accords, on which the PA’s very existence is based. The ongoing effort to upgrade its status from an autonomous entity to that of a state needs, therefore, some clarification as to what extent it is committed indeed to the idea of peace with Israel. Because, if it is not, any such move would raise Israel’s suspicions, cause counteractions and increase instability in the region.

An attempt to answer this question has been made in a study in which the references to the conflict in over two hundred PA schoolbooks and teachers’ manuals of the latest editions were examined. The criteria of analysis used were UNESCO’s guidelines.

The decision to use this particular source material was based on the assumption that schoolbooks are the most reliable indicator of the ideals a society would aspire to instil in the younger generation. If such books are issued exclusively by the government, as is the case with the PA, they also best reflect the deeper beliefs of that government regarding its political aspirations. In clearer wording: the PA’s attitude to the idea of peace with Israel is best shown in its textbooks.

The Oslo Accords and the subsequent establishment of the Palestinian Authority are documented in the books. Most interesting is a letter appearing there that was sent by Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to Yitzhak Rabin, Prime Minister of Israel, prior to the signing of the Declaration of Principles (the initial agreement signed within the Oslo process) in September 1993, in which the PLO recognized the right of the State of Israel to live in peace and new security, accepted the UN Security Council’s resolutions Nos. 242 and 338, committed itself to the peace process in the Middle East and to peaceful resolution of the conflict between the two parties, declared that all the basic issues related to the permanent situation would be solved through negotiations, condemned the use of terror, as well as other violent actions, confirmed that the articles appearing in the Palestinian National Covenant that denied Israel’s right to exist were no longer valid, and took upon itself to present the necessary amendments within that Covenant to the Palestinian National Assembly in order to officially approve them.

This text is self-explanatory and could have served as a firm basis for peace education. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The entire PA curriculum is tuned to war. The motto is liberation from occupation, but the liberation struggle is violent and terror-involved – in clear contradiction to the commitment to non-violence in Arafat’s letter.

Moreover, the liberation of Palestine covers the country in its entirety – contrary to Arafat’s recognition of Israel’s right to exist. Cities inside Israel within its pre-1967 boundaries, such as Jaffa and Acre, are to be liberated specifically. In fact, the Palestinian students learn at school that Palestine is the only sovereign state in the country, and that sovereign Palestine has been under Zionist occupation since 1948. Israel’s pre-1967 territory is phrased “the territories occupied in 1948”. Accordingly, Israel is rarely mentioned by its name and is rather referred to as “the Zionist occupation”. It goes without saying that Israel, within its pre-1967 territory, is absent from all maps.

It should also be noted that Israel’s 7-million Jewish citizens are presented as foreign colonialists and the cities they built, including Tel Aviv, are missing from the map. Their history in the country since antiquity is denied, as is the existence of their holy places there, including the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem, the last remnant of their ancient temple. The Jews’ national language, Hebrew, is erased – literally – from a coin of the British Mandate era before 1948 reproduced in a mathematics textbook.

Both Israel and the Jews are demonised to a point that presents them as an existential threat to the Palestinians within the current conflict, which contradicts any move towards peace with them. Jews are further demonised as enemies of Islam from its early days, as the Devil’s aides, and as enemies of God’s prophets, which makes them automatically enemies of God Himself in the eyes of young Palestinian students who mostly come from traditional environments. Thus, the liberation of Palestine from Zionist occupation becomes religious in character, with the traditional Islamic ideals of Jihad and Shahadah (martyrdom) also involved.

The PA schoolbooks rarely deal with the question – what should be done with the surviving Jews after the liberation of Palestine from “Zionist occupation”. But an Islamic religious textbook brings within this context a traditional text speaking of the eventual annihilation of all Jews.

To conclude, any involvement of the PA in the Gaza administration, and, certainly, any future step toward the recognition of the PA as a state on the road to peaceful resolution of the conflict, should be pre-conditioned by changing its afore-presented educational line from a belligerent one into a decisive commitment to peace with Israel, exactly as it appears in Arafat’s letter to Rabin. The field of education has indeed been mentioned in the context of the needed reforms. The following are suggested specific changes:

  1. Inclusion of Arafat’s letter to Rabin in a number of textbooks of various grades in order to assert the PA’s strategic goal of peaceful resolution of the conflict with Israel.
  2. Use of the letter as a basis for the official recognition of the State of Israel on the part of the PA, to be expressed in all relevant textbooks, that is, showing the State of Israel within its pre-1967 boundaries on all political maps.
  3. Traditional Islamic ideals that carry a belligerent character, such as Jihad and martyrdom, should be disconnected from the current conflict and be left as part of past Islamic history.
  4. Current geographical reality should be reflected in the books, i.e., Tel Aviv and other main Jewish cities should appear on the map.
  5. Falsification of historical objects, such as British Mandatory coins and stamps, should be avoided.
  6. Recognition of the Jews’ history and holy places in the country and elimination of all materials expressing religious bigotry against them.
  7. Elimination of all materials exalting terror.

Arnon Groiss is an Israeli researcher and expert on Iranian state ideology, particularly Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism through entities like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)

David Bedein is an American-Israeli investigative journalist and director of the Middle East Centre for Near East Policy Research (also known as Israel Behind the News). He specialises in exposing alleged ties between the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) and Palestinian terrorist groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

PA demands return to Resolution 181 borders

Seventy-seven years after the UN decision on the partition of the land, the UN has declared the anniversary of the vote the “Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People.” The Palestinian Authority is exploiting the day to demand the return to the

The PA’s official news agency WAFA said on the occasion of the day that “the Palestinian people have not yet realized their incontestable rights.”

The list of demands includes the establishment of an independent and sovereign Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, recognition of East Jerusalem as the capital, and the Palestinians’ right of return to their homes and property from 1948.

Since 2012 Palestine has been recognized at the UN as a “non-member observer state”, and in 2015 the Palestinian flag was raised at the organization’s headquarters in New York and at missions around the world.

Reflections; Four months before the Oct 2023 war

David Bedein Talk at the OU Israel Center June 20 2023

A challenge awaits Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun, President Trump’s special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism:

Three fundamentals of Saudi funded PLO education are

  • De-Legitimization of the State of Israel’s existence and of the mere presence of Jews in Israel which includes denial of their history and the very existence of any Jewish holy places .
  • Demonization of Israel and Jews –, which carries grave implications as far as the Jews’ image is concerned in the eyes of any Palestinian child
  • Absence of any advocacy for peace with Israel. Instead, Saudi funded PLO textbooks call for the  violent struggle for the liberation of the country in its entirety, including Israel’s territory within its pre-1967 boundaries. This struggle is given a religious character, and terror constitutes an integral part thereof – with the accompanying meaning that the killing of Jews is to be encouraged.

This our latest report, in English and Hebrew:

 “Israel, Jews and Peace in Schoolbooks and Teachers’ Guides Used in UNRWA Schools in Judea, Samaria, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip

https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/app/uploads/2024/05/E_114_24.pdf

This is the time for Rabbi Kaplounm, a follower of Chabad,  to invoke the warnings of  Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, ”the Rebbe, who posited that these issues represented an  existential threat to Israel which constituted a matter of “Pikuach Nefesh” a matter of life or death for the Jewish people.

Faulty Follies

As a long time fan of Fawlty Towers and the Life of Brian satirical series I was looking forward to the impending Israel visit of John Cleese.

We had tickets for his originally scheduled show, which was then scuttled by the outbreak of the Iran war and subsequent missile barrages.

His rescheduled appearances in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem were sold out, and the stage was set for memorable evenings of vintage British wit. It was set to be a great night out with Israelis of Anglo background. Interestingly, I also heard of some sabras who were going to be there. Presumably, they were familiar with the subtle and not-so-subtle British satire, which was such a prominent feature of John Cleese’s acts.

It was therefore like a bolt out of the blue when, for the second time, it was announced that Cleese would not be coming to Israel and that all his booked performances had been cancelled.

The reason for this cancellation, according to the promoter’s announcement, which was subsequently confirmed by Cleese himself, was “security.”

Strangely, there has been no clarification as to exactly what threats have compromised security, causing this visit to be cancelled.

The war against Iran has ceased.

There is a so-called ceasefire in Gaza.

No missile barrages from Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran or the Houthis are occurring.

What exactly constitutes a security risk has not been explained.

If it is suggested that Cleese could be in physical danger by visiting Israel, I would submit that he is more at risk of personal injury on the streets of London, Birmingham and Manchester.

He has adamantly asserted that his Israeli performances are “postponed” rather than “cancelled.”

As the mystery deepened, Basil’s (alias John Cleese) social media comments surfaced, offering a clue to the real reason for his sudden cancellation.

It seems that he, like many others, has become infected by the rapidly spreading virus of Zionist/Israel dysfunctional syndrome.

Less than a month after the 7 October 2023 pogrom, he posted this comment: “don’t ask me to take sides between Hamas and the Israeli Government.” Don’t mention the war, especially the worst massacre of Jews since the Shoah, seems to have been his reaction. Anyone who, after that horrendous event, didn’t feel able to “take sides” must be morally unbalanced.

He referred on Oct. 29, 2023, to the Jewish state having the “most right-wing ‘government’ in Israeli history,” which is “kept in power by tiny groups of Judaic fundamentalists” and Hamas as “equally fanatical terrorists.”

After these revelations, Cleese frantically tried to backpedal.

He claimed that his Israel visit was only “postponed” not cancelled and that he would be willing to perform free of charge in the future. His assertion that he was “hugely fond of Israelis” and loves Israeli audiences reminds me of those boycotters who maintain that “some of their best friends are Jews.” Apparently, it’s only the “Judaic Zionists” who are beyond the pale.

It seems evident that the excuse of “security” refers to threats emanating from BDS supporters, which, despite denials, was a factor in his pulling out from performing in Israel. He won’t be coming back anytime soon, if at all.

Meanwhile, more faulty follies abound.

President Macron once again hosted the President for life of the PA, Abbas, in Paris.

This time, he described him as “a prince of peace.”

I know that we are getting close to Christmas, but this accolade is stretching reality fairly thin. However, given the adoration showered upon him by the “wise men” of the EU and the UN, one can expect the collective international chorus to burst into one of the most famous lines from the “Life of Brian.”

HE’S THE MESSIAH!!!!

The Pope has already given him his blessing as a peacemaker.

In today’s cockeyed world, anything is possible.

In this vein, consider the following developments.

A statement issued by the US, Qatar, Egypt, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Jordan and Turkey stated that the Gaza peace plan is the only sincere path to Palestinian statehood and regional stability.

On the heels of this hallucinatory vision is a report that Hamas is stockpiling weapons in various sympathetic countries for future use against Israel. Concurrently, it seems that the US is “wobbling” on disarming and dismantling Hamas. According to Trump’s envoy, Witkoff, a Hamas official told him that the terror group “would disarm.”

If all this sounds like an episode of Fawlty Towers or the “Life of Brian”, you would be correct in your assumption.

If you are still searching for some sanity among a sea of international irrationality, this next piece of news will not help in the slightest.

The Australian Ambassador to Israel recently addressed a gathering in Israel. He touched on the dramatic rise of anti-Jewish hate and incitement in Australia.

According to him, this hate was “linked to growing objections to Israel’s policies which are widely shared. Sadly there is antisemitism but one cannot place the blame on the country’s Muslim community. We hope that now the war is over, calmness can prevail and that Australians – all Australians, including the Jewish community can enjoy the right to worship, gather and celebrate in dignity.”

Noble sentiments indeed, but they are indicative of how large sections of the rest of the world misrepresent the tsunami of incitement now raging against Israel and Jews worldwide.

The anti-Zionist haters couldn’t care less that the missiles have stopped flying and a temporary ceasefire with Hamas is in place. The hate slogans shouted by the demonstrators and university ignoramuses have very little to do with “Palestinians” who are suffering under the brutal regime of terror groups.

All these various individuals and groups unite with jihadists in advocating the elimination of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish People. Their sole and main agenda is the disappearance of the “Zionist entity.” That is why the absence of actual conflict will not diminish in any way the level of hate against Jews in the Diaspora.

Neo Nazis and their ultra-right-wing colleagues will still peddle their conspiracy theories and other hate libels regardless of any developments in the Middle East. Holocaust denial and revisionist histories are gaining larger adherents as time passes.

Media, social and mainstream alike, are generating ever greater incitement and disinformation, which in turn targets Jews.

The Muslim community in Australia now represents more than 3% of the population and is Australia’s second largest religious group after Christianity. Even if only a minority are jihadist followers, their demographic increase, combined with the radicalisation of a generation inculcated with lies about Jews, guarantees a fraught future.

What is true for Australia is the same for Europe, Scandinavia, the UK, the USA, Canada, South America, South Africa and even NZ.

Political cowardice in the face of these threats will embolden those threatening Jewish communities. Empty rhetoric by politicians will not stem the tide.

Hatred of Jews is an incurable and endemic condition.

A commentary I read last week for Shabbat “Chaye Sarah” summed it up perfectly.

“Abraham said I am a foreigner albeit a resident.” This is a rich description of the persistent state of the Jews – we are never fully at home in exile, we are always foreigners, even in our home country.

We have a choice of passive submission as in the failed past or determined and unapologetic proactive action

Thousands Of Chabad Emissaries Urged To Lead Global Pikuach Nefesh Campaign To Counter Six Existential Threats

This past Shabbat, Parashat Chayei Sarah, 5,000 emissaries of the Lubavitcher Rebbe gathered for the annual Kinus HaShluchim, the global Chabad movement’s celebration of the Rebbe’s enduring impact. Thirty-five years after his passing, his guiding voice continues to inspire Jewish communities worldwide.

But this year, as the shluchim prepared to visit the Rebbe’s resting place and renew their mission, the moment demanded more than reflection; it required action. The Rebbe taught that the threats facing Israel and the Jewish people are not political abstractions but matters of Pikuach Nefesh, the preservation of life. That principle, overriding almost every other commandment, obligates decisive intervention when Jews are in danger.

Today, the dangers are unmistakable. The global rise in antisemitism, the intensification of anti-Israel agitation, and the violence incited by terrorist organizations mirror precisely what the Rebbe warned about: that the Arab war against Israel is not a dispute over borders, but a war against Jews living in their homeland.

Hamas, which won the 2006 Palestinian Legislative Council elections, continues to pursue total war. Its charter, like the PLO’s, still calls openly for Israel’s destruction. Neither has been amended, even after the Oslo Accords, which the PLO never ratified. Despite this, 135 nations still fund the PLO without conditions.

This is the hour for Chabad, the world’s largest and most influential Jewish movement, to lead a global, unapologetic campaign to confront six immediate threats to Jewish lives. Each constitutes a direct challenge to Pikuach Nefesh, and therefore demands urgent, coordinated action from the shluchim themselves.


1. “Pay to Slay” Legislation

The Palestinian Authority continues to reward convicted terrorists and the families of those killed while murdering Jews, with lifetime salaries.
To date, no nation has demanded that this law be repealed.
Chabad must lead the call for conditioning all humanitarian aid on the abolition of Pay to Slay.
If an entity wants humanitarian support, it must demonstrate basic humanity.


2. Incitement on PA Media

PA media, using frequencies owned by Israel, regularly glorifies terrorism and calls for violence against Jews.
Chabad must publicly and forcefully advocate for Israel to shut down or jam these frequencies to halt the deadly indoctrination broadcast into millions of Palestinian homes.


3. PA Educational Curriculum

Textbooks used in PA schools, overseen by Israel’s Civil Administration, teach hatred of Jews and encourage armed conflict.
The shluchim should push for the closure of schools that refuse to remove incitement from their curriculum, as a matter of preventing the radicalization of another generation.


4. Palestinian Security Forces (PSF)

Trained by the IDF and once intended to keep order, the PSF has increasingly turned hostile.
Chabad must advocate for the disarmament of these forces, which are a growing threat to Jewish life rather than a stabilizing force.


5. UNRWA

UNRWA serves 6.7 million descendants of 1948 refugees in 59 camps and continues to promote a doctrine of “returning” to Israel through force.
Chabad must press governments to halt all funding to UNRWA unless it undergoes comprehensive reform, and to insist on shutting down UNRWA’s operations in Gaza, where its infrastructure has repeatedly supported extremist activity.


6. COGAT (Israel’s Civil Administration)

COGAT has been criticized for enabling unsupervised Palestinian construction and for allowing the continuation of systems, from extremist curricula to PA media incitement, that undermine Israeli security.
Chabad must demand accountability from COGAT and push for policies that prioritize Jewish safety above bureaucratic inertia.


A Call for Chabad to Lead a Global Pikuach Nefesh Alert

The shluchim, the Rebbe’s own emissaries, must launch a worldwide Pikuach Nefesh Alert, a coordinated campaign presenting verified facts, documentation, and multimedia resources in multiple languages.

The goal:
to awaken global public opinion, pressure policymakers, and safeguard Jewish lives wherever they are threatened.

This is not a political campaign. It is a halachic obligation.

Embracing these six points is not optional; it is the clearest fulfillment of the Rebbe’s teaching that Jewish life must be protected above all else. In honoring the Rebbe’s legacy, Chabad must not only inspire but act, confronting the dangers he foresaw long before the world admitted they existed.

Only by doing so can the shluchim truly preserve and extend the Rebbe’s mission in this critical moment of Jewish history.

Despite promised reforms, PA textbooks still teach antisemitic, anti-Israel messages

A Palestinian textbook depicting a soldier holding a Palestinian flag and a gun, as part of a lesson on the use of hands. (courtesy)

Palestinian Authority textbooks continue to glorify terror, demonize Israelis, traffic in antisemitic themes and advance exclusivist nationalist rhetoric despite promises to implement reforms, a comprehensive study of the authority’s teaching materials has found.

The report was released on Wednesday by the Israel- and UK-based IMPACT-SE watchdog, which monitors educational content. It alleges that textbooks from grades 1-4 and 12, meant to be updated recently to comply with international demands to scrub inciting content, in fact contain no significant changes.

Altogether, across 290 textbooks and 71 teachers’ guides serving those grades and others, researchers cited 210 examples of problematic content. Subjects covered included history, Islamic and Christian religious instruction, Arabic, science, mathematics, civics, social studies and geography.’

PA-produced texts have been flagged for years for containing content that critics say is a key factor in inculcating hate among Palestinian youths, fueling extremism and undercutting efforts to foster peaceful coexistence with Israelis. The materials are used widely across the West Bank and Gaza, including in classrooms run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA.

Now, the report says the content of the textbooks has remained unchanged despite explicit commitments by the PA to reform the curriculum — and despite European officials’ public claims that such reforms were underway. IMPACT-se CEO Marcus Sheff said the findings “expose a stark and disturbing reality.”

hands. (courtesy)

Palestinian Authority textbooks continue to glorify terror, demonize Israelis, traffic in antisemitic themes and advance exclusivist nationalist rhetoric despite promises to implement reforms, a comprehensive study of the authority’s teaching materials has found.

The report was released on Wednesday by the Israel- and UK-based IMPACT-SE watchdog, which monitors educational content. It alleges that textbooks from grades 1-4 and 12, meant to be updated recently to comply with international demands to scrub inciting content, in fact contain no significant changes.

Altogether, across 290 textbooks and 71 teachers’ guides serving those grades and others, researchers cited 210 examples of problematic content. Subjects covered included history, Islamic and Christian religious instruction, Arabic, science, mathematics, civics, social studies and geography.

PA-produced texts have been flagged for years for containing content that critics say is a key factor in inculcating hate among Palestinian youths, fueling extremism and undercutting efforts to foster peaceful coexistence with Israelis. The materials are used widely across the West Bank and Gaza, including in classrooms run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA.

Now, the report says the content of the textbooks has remained unchanged despite explicit commitments by the PA to reform the curriculum — and despite European officials’ public claims that such reforms were underway. IMPACT-se CEO Marcus Sheff said the findings “expose a stark and disturbing reality.”

“Virulent antisemitism, the glorification of jihad and incitement to violence remain deeply embedded across all grades of Palestinian Authority textbooks,” he said.

Reform of the Palestinian educational curriculum is also a central component of the US peace plan for the region following the war in Gaza. There was no immediate PA or EU response to the report upon its publication.

A Palestinian textbook teaching about elements of air by depicting soldiers firing tear gas and a photo of a masked individual holding a slingshot. (courtesy)

‘We carry the flame of the revolution’

Despite assurances earlier this year that books for grades 1–4 and 12 would undergo reform by September, problematic content persists, according to a litany of examples presented in the report.

In 1st-grade Arabic, a reading exercise introduces the word “shaheed,” or martyr, to teach about a letter. In Palestinian society, the word martyr typically refers to someone who is killed in a conflict with Israel.

In 2nd-grade Arabic, a poem is presented to students, reading, “We give our souls for the revolution. We carry the flame of the revolution — to Haifa, to Jaffa, to Al-Aqsa and the Dome of the Rock.”

Haifa and Jaffa are within Israel’s internationally recognized borders, and Israel annexed East Jerusalem, which contains the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque, more than four decades ago. The poem appears with an illustration of a boy and girl in Palestinian scout uniforms gazing toward Jerusalem.

An illustration accompanying an audio segment about the use of hands, in a 1st-grade Arabic textbook, depicts an armed soldier holding a weapon and the Palestinian flag. The book presents illustrations for each of the activities mentioned, such as playing or planting a tree, but the illustration of the soldier is larger than all the others — underscoring its importance.

Students sit in a classroom on the first day of the new school year at the United Nations-run Elementary School at the Shati refugee camp in Gaza City, August 8, 2020. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)

In a 12th-grade Islamic education book, Jews are presented as manipulators and liars through a traditional Islamic account in which Jewish leaders tried to persuade Muhammad to betray his faith by promising to convert if he ruled unjustly in their favor.

The characters, explicitly labeled “Jews,” are portrayed as immoral and hostile to Islam — with no attempt to contextualize the story in its historical period.

In addition, according to the study, references to Jewish history and Israeli-Arab diplomatic efforts, which appeared in earlier editions, have been removed. Mentions of the Camp David and Annapolis peace processes — as well as any content promoting non-violence or compromise — remain absent in the 2025–2026 textbooks.

In fact, any acknowledgement of Jewish history is absent, with the Holocaust ignored. Likewise, the persecution and expulsion suffered by Jewish communities in Arab countries upon the establishment of Israel is entirely absent.

Even in fields unrelated to Israel, textbooks fall short of UN educational standards, the report found, saying Islamic education books continue to present women as weak and subordinate to men.

No change despite explicit promises

The key commitment on educational reform was made in July 2024, when the Palestinian Authority signed a “Letter of Intent” with the EU’s European Commission pledging to reform its curriculum.

The 2024 Letter of Intent, in which the PA committed to changing the curriculum, served as the basis for the transfer of over €400 million ($462 million) from the European Union to the PA between July and September 2024 — conditioned on meeting education-related reform benchmarks. This followed previous years in which the EU froze funding over incitement concerns.

Illustrative: Palestinian children use laptops at the Ziad Abu Ein School in the West Bank city of Ramallah, September 8, 2018 (AP Photo/Majdi Mohammed)

However, that September, Abdul Hakim Abu Jamous, head of the Humanities Division in the Palestinian Ministry of Education, told the Palestinian newspaper Al-Quds: “Not a single word has been removed or changed in the textbooks.”

He added that the Palestinian Ministry of Education had not agreed to any changes in the curriculum.

The PA first put out texts in 2000, replacing Jordanian and Egyptian books used until then. From 2016 to 2019, it rolled out new books, though studies by IMPACT-SE at the time showed that they still contained problematic content.

Both the PA and the European Union, which funds Palestinian educational activities, pledged that the educational materials would be revised again to remove content that incites hatred and violence.

EU statements from April 2025 claimed that the PA had agreed to a reform plan with measurable milestones, intended to translate the Letter of Intent into an actionable implementation document. But according to the study, as of November 2025, no public version of this plan exists, along with no timetable, and there is no evidence that it is being implemented.

Dalal Mughrabi, who carried out the 1978 coastal road attack, is featured in a Palestinian textbook. (courtesy)

In response to a parliamentary question in July 2025, EU Commissioner Dubravka Šuica had reaffirmed that new textbooks for grades 1-4, edited to meet UNESCO standards promoting peace and tolerance, were expected to be ready by September. Other grades were set to follow gradually in 2026–2027.

However, at the end of September, Šuica publicly admitted that so far, when it came to educational reform, the “latest round started with grade 12 at the end of 2024 and has moved to earlier grades in recent months.”

According to the IMPACT-SE report, even those early-grade books were not changed.

Now, the PA is setting new benchmarks. In his speech to the UN General Assembly in September 2025, PA President Mahmoud Abbas stated: “We will develop the educational curricula in accordance with UNESCO standards within two years.”

Encouraging conspiracy theories of Jewish global control

The study showed that textbooks across the intervening grades also continue to depict Jews as manipulative, inherently corrupt, or as enemies of Islam. This includes the use of classic conspiracy motifs — such as Jewish greed, control of the media, and dominance over financial institutions.

A children’s song in a Palestinian textbook that says that children “carry the flame of the revolution”. (courtesy)

One example appears in an 11th-grade history textbook, which features a cartoon evoking antisemitic imagery of Jews controlling the world. Under the label “cultural colonialism,” the book presents a black-and-white image of two arms gripping a globe: one holding an American flag, the other an Israeli flag.

A 10th-grade history textbook claims that, after World War II, “the Zionists hoped the US would support the establishment of their national homeland in Palestine — by exploiting their political, media and financial influence in the United States.”

According to the study, in some cases, Israelis are portrayed as demonic figures, accused of atrocities, and portrayed as inherently evil. Poems and songs grant legitimacy to violence and teach that Israel’s very existence is illegitimate.

For example, in an 11th-grade Islamic education textbook, Quranic verses are used to teach that “the Children of Israel” are corrupt, destined for destruction, and divinely punished. Shifting to the future tense, it interprets the Quran as prophesying that the Israelites will briefly regain power but find their end in humiliation and defeat at the hands of “the servants of God.”

The demonization extends to secular subjects as well.

A 9th-grade civics textbook claims Israel “deliberately releases herds of pigs” to damage Palestinian crops and weaken the Palestinian economy.

A 7th-grade social studies book dismisses Jewish history in Palestine as irrelevant and labels Jewish historical presence in Jerusalem as a “fabrication” meant to erase Arab-Islamic heritage

A 7th-grade social studies book dismisses Jewish history in Palestine as irrelevant and labels Jewish historical presence in Jerusalem as a “fabrication” meant to erase Arab-Islamic heritage.

A map in a Palestinian textbook for 2025-2026 showing the borders of Palestine, without mentioning Israel. (courtesy)

The erasure is reflected in maps as well, which omit Israel. In a 6th-grade social studies book, only Palestine is shown on the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.

Another textbook for national education likewise uses maps labeled only “Palestine,” while in other places, Israel is referred to repeatedly as “the Zionist entity” or “the Zionist occupier.”

In Israeli schools as well, most maps do not clearly delineate between Israel’s internationally recognized borders and the West Bank.

Modeling violence

Textbook analysis shows continued encouragement of violence and terrorism, including through an explicitly Islamic religious framing of the concept of jihad. In a 10th-grade Islamic education textbook, students are asked: “Under what circumstances is jihad to liberate Palestine considered a personal duty for every Muslim?”

According to the report, this wording represents an intensification of earlier content: The 2019 edition referred to jihad as a duty for all Muslims, but did not explicitly link it to “liberating Palestine.”

In a 7th-grade Arabic textbook, jihad is presented as a path to paradise, while an 8th-grade Islamic education text praises armed jihad, defined as fighting on behalf of Islam

In a 7th-grade Arabic textbook, jihad is presented as a path to paradise, while an 8th-grade Islamic education text praises armed jihad, defined as fighting on behalf of Islam.

Religious framing is reinforced with concrete examples of Palestinian terror attacks.

In a 5th-grade Arabic language textbook, students learn about Dalal al-Mughrabi, a Fatah terrorist who carried out the 1978 Coastal Road massacre, killing 38 Israelis — including 13 children. It was the deadliest terror attack on Israel before the Hamas-led onslaught of October 7, 2023. The 10-page text glorifies the attack as an act of “heroism” and praises al-Mughrabi.

A member of the Palestinian terror group which seized members of the Israeli Olympic Team at their quarters at the Munich Olympic Village appears with a hood over his face on the balcony of the village building where the terrorists held several team members hostage, September 5, 1972. (Kurt Strumpf/AP)

In an 11th-grade history textbook, the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre, in which 11 Israeli athletes and members of the Olympic delegation were murdered, is presented as a legitimate form of Palestinian resistance.

“The Palestinian resistance resorted to many methods in its struggle against the Zionist occupation. The fedayeen primarily used guerrilla warfare inside Palestinian territories, and also struck Zionist interests abroad — such as the Munich operation in 1972,” the book states.

In an 11th-grade history textbook, the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre, in which 11 Israeli athletes and members of the Olympic delegation were murdered, is presented as a legitimate form of Palestinian resistance

A 9th-grade civics textbook teaches students that armed struggle is justified: “The right of peoples to self-determination, including their right to resist occupation and foreign rule — even through armed force — is natural and legitimate.”

Alongside a passage on “peaceful resistance,” the book features an image of masked youths throwing stones — visually reinforcing the legitimacy of violence.

Math and science used to normalize violence

In many cases, terror-related themes are woven into subjects that have no connection to nationalism or history — reinforcing violent narratives through science and mathematics.

In a 10th-grade science textbook, Newton’s Laws are taught using the example of a young girl firing a stone from a slingshot.

A 3rd-grade math book teaches numeracy through the “number of martyrs” killed in Gaza in 2014 — referring to Israel’s Operation Protective Edge that year only as “the aggression against Gaza,” with no mention of the Hamas rocket fire or cross-border tunnel attacks that preceded it.

File: Palestinian demonstrators move away from Israeli tear gas while protesting what tey said were attempts by Israeli settlers from Eli to take control of a water spring in the village of Qaryut, south of Nablus in the West Bank, on June 24, 2022. (JAAFAR ASHTIYEH / AFP)

In an 8th-grade science textbook, students learn about elements of air through a story describing Israeli security forces launching tear gas in the Ramallah area of the West Bank. Next to the passage, there is a photo of a masked individual holding a slingshot.

Another example appears in a 7th-grade science textbook. Before introducing liquid solutions, the opening page is dedicated to Palestinian prisoners. The page claims that salt and water play a key role in “the hunger strikes of Palestinian prisoners” — alongside an illustration of an anthropomorphic stomach breaking chains, holding a Palestinian flag and a dove of peace, “surviving only on salt and water.”

Later in the same book, students study human physiology through a narrative of Israeli soldiers firing tear gas and smoke grenades at a youth camp near Ramallah.

The incident is presented as entirely unprovoked, and students are asked to identify bodily systems activated by fear and stress.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas speaks via video during the General Debate of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York City on September 25, 2025. (TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP)

Similarly, in an 11th-grade math textbook, statistics are taught through the example of “a settler opening fire on cars on one of the roads.”

Teacher guides – even more extreme

The Palestinian Authority’s teacher guides — which were also examined — expand on the problematic and violent content, instructing educators on how to frame it in the classroom.

In an 8th-grade science teacher’s guide, during a unit on the classification of living organisms, teachers are directed to hold discussions about “the residents of villages and towns who were expelled by the Zionist occupation,” a clear reference to the displacement of Palestinians upon Israel’s founding in 1948, despite having no connection to the lesson’s subject.

Stone-throwing featured in text about peaceful resistance in Palestinian textbook. (courtesy)

In another guide, for 10th-grade modern history and geography, armed resistance is presented as one of the legitimate ways to “rise up against the settlements in Palestine.”

The text does not clarify that this refers only to settlements in the West Bank, but instead implies that it refers to all the land between the river and the sea.

A teacher’s guide for 8th-grade Arabic goes further, instructing teachers to teach that: “Zionism is modern terrorism and is destined to disappear,” and that the Right of Return must not be relinquished. This refers to the demand that millions of descendants of Palestinians who fled or were expelled in 1948 be allowed to return and settle inside the State of Israel, which Israel views as a recipe for its destruction.

A 10th-grade history teacher’s guide instructs educators to reject UN resolutions — even those calling for peace — if they are perceived to undermine Palestinian national rights.

The UN Wants To Create A Palestinian State, BUT Netanyahu Has An Ace Card Up His Sleeve!

While the world rewards violence with promises of statehood, a master strategist plays the long game. In this gripping episode of Straight Up, Daniel Seaman peels back the curtain on a brutal terror attack, the chilling murder of a Tanzanian student by Hamas and the global diplomatic chess game now revolving around Trump’s UN-backed Gaza plan. Is Netanyahu really silent… or silently shaping the entire region? This is a story of power, propaganda and a Middle East twist you didn’t see coming.

The Evil Overlap: How Anti-Zionism Became The New Antisemitism – and Mainstreamed Jew-hatred Again

On November 10, 1975, the United Nations General Assembly declared Zionism ״a form of racism and racial discrimination.״ That resolution singled out one form of nationalism in that forum of nationalisms, Jewish nationalism.

At the time, Resolution 3379 didn׳t mention Jews. Nevertheless, left-wingers and right-wingers, Americans and Europeans, Jews and non-Jews alike, called the UN׳s proclamation ״antisemitic.״ They recognized that because Judaism is so foundational to Zionism, anti-Zionism is a form of antisemitism. And 30 years after Auschwitz, most Westerners condemned Jew-hatred. Still, the Wall Street Journal warned that, with the UN׳s imprimatur, the resolution׳s ״practical effect will be to restore respectability to the dormant irrational hatred of the Jewish people.״ The Journal editors and many others remembered that until the 1940s anti-semitism was respectable in the West.

Bayard Rustin, who organized Martin Luther King׳s 1963 March on Washington, feared the ״incalculable damage״ done to the fight against bigotry, when the word ״racism״ becomes a political weapon rather than a moral standard. Seeing anti-Zionism incorporate traditional antisemitism into the Arab desire to eradicate Israel, Rustin quoted King that ״when people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews, you are talking antisemitism.״ Nevertheless, 50 years later, even when anti-Zionists express their hatred of Israel by attacking Jews and Jewish institutions thousands of miles away, some believe their claim: ״I׳m not antisemitic, just critical of Israel.״

The gaslighting is so common that in spring 2024, 600 Columbia University students felt compelled to sign a letter refuting this lie. They repudiated ״our Jewish peers who tokenize themselves by claiming to represent ‘real Jewish values,׳ and attempt to delegitimize our lived experiences of antisemitism.״ These students proclaimed: ״We proudly believe in the Jewish People׳s right to self-determination in our historic homeland as a fundamental tenet of our Jewish identity. Contrary to what many have tried to sell you – no, Judaism cannot be separated from Israel. Zionism is, simply put, the manifestation of that belief.״

Charging Jews – as Zionists – with the inexcusable biologically-based crime of racism, anti-Zionists became increasingly totalitarian, subordinating all other values to the anti-Israel impulse. Anti-Zionism became the glue holding a diverse left together. These fanatics׳ triple-double cross was exemplified by many feminists׳ silence after the widespread gender-based violence Jewish women and girls suffered on October 7. They betrayed the Jews – alas, an old story. They betrayed liberal ideas – a 50-year story. But they also betrayed themselves, their core commitments. One Jewish woman in London complained, ״It׳s #MeToo… Unless you׳re a Jew.״

Launching this UN-validated libel 50 years ago also helped make antisemitic anti-Zionism central to the far left, Marxist-infused ideology that keeps changing its name – call it Identity Politics, Modern Progressivism, Woke, Critical Race Theory, Postmodernism, or the Academic Intifada. This ideology, which dominated elite academia by 2020, justifiably abhorred racism. But, after Israel won the 1967 war, after Palestinian and Soviet propagandists racialized the Jewish-Palestinian national conflict, hating Zionism as a racist, imperialist, colonialist endeavor became a defining progressive cause. Israel was the poster child of the 1960s left with its kibbutz, labor unions, and Jaffa oranges. Especially after South African Apartheid ended in the 1990s, Israel became the far left׳s most hated nation.

Today, many leftists condemn Israeli actions as ״oppressive,״ while forgiving any Palestinian violence because they׳re ״oppressed.״ By hiding that bias behind human rights, anti-racism, and anti-colonialist rhetoric, left-wing Jew-hatred often requires paragraphs to refute. Right-wing Jew-hatred is more obvious.

Left-leaning, anti-racist, neo-Nazi-hating, ״Jew-haters try to avoid using the term ‘Jew׳ or ‘Jewish׳ and instead reach for the word ‘Zionist׳ or ‘Zionism,׳״ the British Labour Party parliamentarian Denis MacShane explains. In 1964, the Vatican II council condemned the traditional ״hatred and persecutions of Jews.״ Since then, both jihadists and illiberal liberals keep merging their attacks on Israel with a traditional, conspiratorial hatred of the Jews. The obsessive, self-destructive hatred of the Islamic Republic of Iran for Jews and the Jewish state – nearly 1000 miles away from Israel – embodies the evil overlap intertwining today׳s anti-Zionism with modern antisemitism.

Professor Judea Pearl, whose son Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and beheaded by jihadists shortly after 9/11, sidesteps the ״is anti-Zionism antisemitic״ debate. He argues that ״Zionophobia״ – an irrational, obsessive hatred of Zionists and Israelis is bad enough, whether or not it׳s rooted in historical hostility to Jews. In fact, America׳s 1964 Civil Rights Act, the legal foundation for fighting bigotry on campus, doesn׳t prohibit religious prejudice. It bars ״discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin.״ That makes discriminating against Israelis a blatant violation of the Act – although those who understand that Jews are a people too would understand that ״national origin״ should include Jews.

Antisemitism, Defined

Surprisingly, despite its age and reach, many people still quibble about how to define antisemitism. Antisemitism is an obsessive hatred exaggerating the centrality and supposed wickedness of Jews and anything Jewish – the Jewish people, Jewish tradition and values, Jewish institutions, and Israel, the Jewish state. The disproportionate hatred is often expressed in demonization, delegitimization, and double-standards that go far beyond reasonable criticism applied to others – Natan Sharansky׳s ״3Ds.״

Breaking down the definition:

״Antisemitism״: This term risks making the prejudice sound scientific. It also allows Arab apologists to say, ״we׳re Semites too.״ The German propagandist Wilhelm Marr coined the term in 1879. His pamphlet Der Weg zum Siege des Germanenthums über das Judenthum (The Way to Victory of Germanism over Judaism) warned that Jews could never live with Germans or as Germans, even if they assimilated. He founded the Antisemiten-Liga (The League of Antisemites) in the same year. It remains the most used term. As an ״ism,״ it captures the ideological dimension of seeing Jews as a source of evil. Jew-hatred is the expression of bigotry, acts of bias against Jews, individually or collectively. Most antisemites express their Jew-hatred actively. But some antisemites believe the ideology while treating individual Jews kindly, just as some Jew-haters disdain Jews or beat them without a broader theory.

״Obsessive״: Some people build themselves up by knocking others down. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines ״obsession״ as ״a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often-unreasonable idea or feeling.״ Especially after October 7th, so many people with conflicting agendas, focusing on this one conflict and building their identity around denouncing Israel׳s alleged evils, reflected the unhealthy but historical preoccupation with Jews.

״Exaggerating the centrality and supposed wickedness״: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, involving 0.18 percent of the world׳s 8 billion people, has generated massive coverage, nearly 100 times more articles in the American media than the bloody, American-led nine-month battle in Mosul. Censuring Jews, Israelis, and Zionists became a defining feature of so many students and professors, left-wingers and right-wingers. Reasonable people called the Gaza war a ״genocide,״ which denotes systematic, intentional, slaughter not casualties in a war of self-defense. Others called it the 21st century׳s ״most violent conflict.״ Even if one accepts Hamas׳s claim of 63,000 deaths as of August, 2025, 600,000 died in Syria, and three million died in the Democratic Republic of Congo. If medieval haters believed ״the Jew״ posed the major threat to them, too many today see ״the Jewish state״ as posing the greatest threat to the world.

״Of Jews and anything Jewish – the Jewish people, Jewish heritage, Jewish institutions, and Israel, the Jewish state״: Antisemitism and Jew-hatred don׳t stop with individual Jews. They metastasize, repudiating anything Jewish – and targeting anything and anyone Jewish. That is why, when Palestinians attack Israel, Jew-haters in Montreal, Paris, and Sydney fire-bomb Jewish schools, torch synagogues, harass Jews wearing kippot, or worse.

It׳s a two-way hatred. By disliking individual Jews, you despise anything associated with them. And after disliking a Jewish value, institution or state, you take it out on individual Jews, no matter where they stand politically, religiously, or geographically.

״The disproportionate hatred״: Jews aren׳t perfect, nor are their values, institutions, or governments. Healthy diverse, democratic communities need a culture of criticism and self-criticism. Fighting antisemitism isn׳t squelching critique. It׳s distinguishing between normative disapproval, even denunciation, of individuals, ideas, actions, versus escalating criticisms into a sweeping, categorical, essentialist loathing.

״Often expressed in demonization, delegitimization and double-standards – Natan Sharansky׳s ‘3Ds.׳״ Two decades ago, to distinguish healthy critique of Israeli actions from broad assaults on Israel itself, the former-Soviet Jewish activist Natan Sharansky identified the tonal, conceptual, and historical overlaps linking traditional antisemitism with anti-Zionism, ״the New antisemitism.״ Sharansky emphasized three dimensions that root today׳s hatred in centuries-old obsessions.

Demonization – treating Jews as the devil, a force of evil.

Delegitimization – exaggerating Jewish sins, real or imagined, to negate the validityof the Jews׳ religion, peoplehood, ties to Israel, or right to live in peace.

Double Standards – the selective, disproportionate assault on Israel or Jews, which holds anything Jewish to standards no others are expected to reach. This goes far beyond standard criticism or disagreement.

Sharansky׳s 3Ds helped expose left-wing Jew-hatred packaged as mere ״criticism of Israel.״ It׳s not that hard to criticize Israeli actions or policies. The antisemite feels compelled to escalate, unfairly generalizing about what Israel, Zionism, or the Jewish people are or think or feel.

Left-wing antisemitism hides behind human rights language, confusing those who respect human rights.

Today, Right-wing antisemitism also confuses, occasionally hiding behind pro-Israel rhetoric. That bigotry sits on 4Hs:

Hegemonic fears: Bigots claim that powerful, secretive Jews seek world domination – hegemony – that ״Jews will not replace us,״ that wealthy Jews like the Rothschild family and George Soros are ruining the world. They characterize the American government as ZOG – the Zionist Occupied Government. These lies build on traditional libels of treacherous Jews, spidery Jewish networks, and Jewish conspiracies seeking world domination.

Holocaust-denialism or abuse: Many Islamists and Palestinians, most famously PA President Mahmoud Abbas, minimize the Holocaust or, paradoxically, often excuse Nazi mass-murder by suggesting the Jews deserved it. Similarly, far right bigots, especially White supremacists and neo-Nazis, deny Hitler׳s crimes or romanticize them.

Halachic hostility: Especially in Europe, opposition to Jewish law – Halacha – has encouraged campaigns outlawing circumcision (brit milah) and kosher slaughter (shechita). Here, echoing left-wing anti-Zionists, haters mask their Jew-hatred, claiming they׳re being ״humane.״ Yet Europe allows bullfights and hunting. And the enthusiasm of neo-Nazis and other Jew-haters for the bans exposes most activists׳ hypocrisy.

Historical libels: Antisemitic slurs are recycled from the Middle Ages, Voltaire and other Enlightened thinkers, the 1800s, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, the Nazis. Many criticize Jewish individuals, Judaism, the Jewish people, and the Jewish state, by updating slanderous stereotyping of Jews as greedy, corrupt, disloyal, unpatriotic, exploitative, child-murdering, blood-sucking profiteers.

The 3Ds and 4Hs analysis helps expose many haters these days. When British protesters wave signs claiming ״ISRAEL IS THE WORST TERROR STATE IN HISTORY: Child Killers, Land Grabbers, Oppressors, Zionists, Liars, and Snakes,״ it׳s clear that Israel – and Jews — are being demonized. When, after October 7, agitators from Within Our Lifetime – United for Palestine (WOL) endorse Palestinian resistance ״in all its forms. By any means necessary. With no exceptions,״ it׳s clear that delegitimizing Israel justifies any violence no matter how heinous – against Israel and Jews. And when signs appear in New York with the Palestinian flag as background proclaiming ״BABIES ARE OCCUPIERS TOO,״ the double standard is clear. No child׳s murder should be celebrated.

Similarly, from the right. The conservative commentator Tucker Carlson hits many of the boxes by himself. When his February, 2023, documentary ״Hungary vs. Soros: The Fight for Civilization״ claimed George Soros has spent decades waging a ״political, social, and demographic war on the West,״ he was spreading the fear that Soros, a spidery, well-connected Jew, sought hegemony, to rule the world. When he calls the Holocaust revisionist Darryl Cooper, who claims Nazis didn׳t intend to kill Jews but were ״unprepared״ to deal with the large numbers they imprisoned, the ״best and most honest popular historian in the United States,״ he׳s legitimizing Holocaust denial. And when he calls Ukraine׳s Jewish president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, ״sweaty and rat-like,״ ״shifty,״ and ״a persecutor of Christians,״ he׳s peddling historical libels.

The most widely accepted definition of antisemitism today, the IHRA definition, identifies many of these tendencies. In 2005, the EU׳s European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia published the definition. In 2016, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance adopted it. Over 1,266 different entities have adopted this definition, which features eleven illustrative examples, seven of which distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate criticism of Israel. The formal definition states: ״Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.״ The illustrations include threatening Jews, stereotyping Jews, unfairly accusing Jews, and Nazifying Jews – or the Jewish state.

The IHRA definition – pronounced Ira – is often mischaracterized. Rather than branding all criticisms of Israel and Zionism antisemitic, its authors tried to reserve substantial room for legitimate debate – and implicitly challenge critics to ask themselves why it׳s so hard for them to have calm conversations when discussing Jews or Israel, and why do they go hysterical so frequently when discussing Zionism.

Antisemitism was and is Foundational to Mainstream Palestinian Nationalism

In The Nature of Prejudice (1954), Harvard׳s leading social psychologist, Gordon Allport, tracked anti-Black bias. His five-point scale built from ״verbal violence״ – talking – to snubbing, discriminating, wounding, then killing, especially lynching. Many anti-Zionists similarly escalate.

Sincere universalists reject all nationalisms, including Zionism. But pro-Palestinian anti-Zionists champion Palestinian nationalism, while negating Jewish nationalism. That reveals their real objection: to Zionism׳s Jewishness, not nationalism itself.

Similarly, Zionists have long debated Zionist fundamentals, and there are sincere non-Zionists who have more faith in a Jewish future in the Diaspora. All honest critics, however, are morally obligated to distance themselves from the bigots. No Jews are obligated to ease the way intellectually for their enemies – especially because so many pro-Palestinian forces unapologetically assail Jews, Jewish institutions, and the Jewish state – descending into the pit Gordon Allport mapped, from insults to murder.

Since Palestinian nationalism emerged, antisemitism has been at the core of its ideology –
while Palestinian terrorists have become the most lethal Jew-haters since the Nazis, long before October 7 – murdering hundreds of Jews and targeting dozens of Jewish institutions. That׳s their fault, not the Jews׳ responsibility. Hamas׳s founding charter quotes Koranic verses targeting the Jews. Article 28 proclaims, ״Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Muslim people. ‘May the cowards never sleep.׳״ The supposedly moderate Palestinian Authority also demonizes Jews, often with religious language. On the PA׳s official television station, preachers proclaim, as one did on April 17, 2022: ״Allah, delight us with the extermination of the evil Jews.״

Similarly, Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas echoed antisemitic tropes when addressing the UN on May 15, 2023. Blaming the U.S. and Great Britain for the Palestinian Nakba – catastrophe – Abbas trumpeted that old stereotype, the hateful Jew who must be expelled from proper society. He claimed ״Western countries wanted to get rid of the Jews and to benefit from them in Palestine. They wanted to kill two birds with one stone.״ In two sentences, Abbas denied Israel׳s legitimacy, deemed it ״settler-colonialist,״ treated Jews as repulsive foreign entities, and framed Zionist history as starting with the Holocaust, not centuries before.

It׳s not coincidental that when Middle East tensions spike, anti-Zionists attack Jews. It happened in 2000 and 2001, in 2009 and 2012, in 2014 and 2021 – the last four marking clashes between Israel and Hamas. And on October 7, 2023, the two hatreds of anti-Zionism and antisemitism fed one another. In Israel, Gazan terrorists boasted to parents about slaughtering ״Jews.״ Some promised, ״We will slaughter you and you will say that what Hitler did to you was a joke.״ They revealed mainstream Palestinian anti-Jewish anti-Zionism. In protests worldwide, waving placards hoping to ״Keep the World Clean״ of the Jewish Star, by using events in Israel to attack Jews and Jewish spaces, Palestinian supporters broadcast their anti-Zionist antisemitism. No wonder most Israelis, left to right, religious to secular, evoked the ״pogroms״ and called October 7th ״the worst day in Jewish history״ – not Israeli history – ״since the Holocaust.״

The clash between Palestinians and Israel is complicated enough. Most Palestinian activists׳ anti-Jewish bigotry and calls to destroy Israel are accelerants. With Palestinians׳ anti-normalization strategy boycotting Israelis and all but the most anti-Zionist Jews, every tension between Palestinians and Jews escalates into a monolithic, essentialist, do-or-die narrative.

Today, Jews find themselves ״on the wrong side of a political binary that provided no room for the complexity of history or current politics,״ according to Harvard׳s 2025 ״Presidential Task Force on Combatting Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias.״ Many illiberal professors, leading the Academic Intifada, cast Jews and Israelis as forever-guilty ״settler-colonialists,״ and thus ״oppressors,״ making Palestinians and their supporters forever-innocent ״oppressed.״ Labeling Zionism ״racism,״ and Israel ״settler-colonialist,״ ״genocidal,״ and ״apartheid,״ turns the Middle East׳s knotty nationalist clash into a black-and-white, good-versus-evil, racial struggle.

Back in 1975, America׳s ambassador to the UN, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, outed the bigots hiding behind legitimate criticisms of Israeli policy to advance their nefarious agenda. This hurricane of libels inspired his prediction that even when attacked, Israel ״would not just be blamed״ for any Middle East crisis, ״Israel would be regretted.״ But even Moynihan couldn׳t have imagined that support for Palestinians – including Hamas terrorists – would become the left׳s ״omnicause.״ From the way Keffiyehs have become so fashionable, to the Palestinian flags waved at Los Angeles riots against Donald Trump׳s immigration crackdown in June, 2025, ״Free Palestine״ and hating Jews have interwoven anti-Zionism and antisemitism ever more tightly.

At the same time, many anti-Zionists׳ kitchen sink approach to Jew-baiting betrays their extremism. From the left, Dr. Rupa Marya at UCSF medical school claims that ״Zionism as an ideology of supremacy in medicine impacts health and health care access for people of color״ – in San Francisco, 7,387 miles from Tel Aviv. From the right, Candace Owens blames Israel for 9/11 and claims the ADL – Anti-Defamation League – was founded to shield a Jewish pedophile. And many in the Arab world update the church׳s medieval blood libel by claiming Israel not only targets Palestinian babies but also harvests Palestinian organs.

Still, the far left׳s anti-racist antisemites insist: ״We׳re not antisemitic, just anti-Israel.״ They claim they׳re only criticizing Israel – although with no other country do they have such trouble controlling their fury. And they ״what-about,״ pretending the far right׳s equally abhorrent Jew-hatred excuses theirs. Yet they resurrect historical slurs and obsessions as zealously as their Islamist allies and right-wing opponents.

Anti-Zionism Keeps Updating Jew-Hatred

Beyond charging ״Zionophobia,״ there׳s a simple case to make about how bigots merged antisemitism with anti-Zionism – and a complicated case. It starts with the anti-Jewish rhetoric cascading throughout the Palestinian movement, the pro-Palestinian movement, the Islamist movement, and much of the Arab world. Too many grow up hating Israel – and targeting the Jews. When Muslim teenagers rape a 12-year-old girl in the Parisian suburb Courbevoie, cursing her as a Jew while brutalizing her, just as the Gazan rapists did on October 7, it׳s clear that, in this inflamed atmosphere against Israel and Zionism, too many parents raise youngsters to dehumanize Jews.

Decades before Yasir Arafat and Hamas, in the 1940s, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, weaved traditional antisemitism into Palestinian nationalism. A follower of Heinrich Himmler and Adolf Hitler who called Jews ״locusts״ and ״microbes,״ al-Husseini quoted the Koran to denounce ״the perfidiousness of Jewry.״ Tom Khaled Würdemann, an expert on Palestinian antisemitism at the Heidelberg School of Jewish Studies, notes that ״the demonizing logic of antisemitism,״ now braided into Palestinian nationalism, rejects anything Jewish, especially the Jewish state. That exacerbates the conflict, sidelining debates about borders, teaching about the Jewish enemy: ״There can be no compromise with its treachery; its suffering is celebrated.״

Palestinians, at least, are unhappy neighbors whose conflict fits into a long history worldwide of border disputes and clashing nationalisms. The antisemitic anti-Zionism of the Iranian mullahs shows the hatred at its purest. Iran is 1000 miles away from Israel. Yet Iran׳s desire to kill Jews and destroy the Jewish state was so obsessive that it spiraled into self-destruction, as Israel in June 2025 finally hit back, hard.

Remarkably, anti-Zionism keeps updating Jew-hatred.

Romans totalized, declaring war on everything the Jews did and were. They murdered over one million Jews, a quarter of Judea׳s population, while delegitimizing Jews by committing ״historicide.״ Trying to kill Jewish history, they changed Israel׳s name to Palestine. Today, protesters calling ״Israel the worst terror state ever,״ hoping to ״globalize the Intifada״ – which targeted Jews in Israel and abroad — saying ״the only good Zionist is a dead Zionist,״ envision a Palestinian state ״from the River to the Sea.״ Leaving no room for Jews – denying Jews׳ presence in the Land of Israel – updates Romans׳ essentialist Jew-hatred.

Christian Jew-haters warned that Jews were punitive and vengeful, like their Old Testament God, making them Christ-killers, slaying innocents. Anti-Zionists caricature Israel as punitive and vengeful, slaying innocent Palestinians. In 2023, protesters called Israel ״genocidal״ even before Israel counter-attacked Gaza. When Londoners dyed their dresses red, carried baby dolls swathed in white clothes splotched with red, along with a photo of Jesus on the cross, proclaiming ״DO NOT LET THEM DO THE SAME THING TODAY AGAIN,״ they updated Medieval Christianity׳s theological anti-Judaism, hating Jews׳ heresy, rejecting their beliefs.

Muslim Jew-haters resented Jews as rivals, designating them ״dhimmi״ – second-class citizens. That makes a thriving Israel infuriating, defying their sense of order in the world. Protesters shout: ״Khaybar, Khaybar Ya Yahud, Jaish Mohammed Sauf Ya׳ud״ – “Khaybar Khaybar oh Jews, the army of Mohammed is returning.” Threatening Jews – and Israelis – to redo the 628 Khaybar massacre or other atrocities updates Islamists׳ adversarial Jew-hatred, hating Jews as rivals, for staying different.

Europeans in the 1300s blamed the Jews for the Bubonic Plague – then murdered hundreds of them. In 2020, the Tweet asking ״<<#covid19 or #covid1948>> Which one do you think is worse?״ was forwarded with Israeli maps. Those who helped the Tweet go viral, treating Israel as a plague, updated infectious antisemitism, characterizing Judaism as a disease infecting mind, body, and soul.

Spanish Inquisitors in 1492 deemed ״the Jews״ the ultimate villains, untrustworthy, dishonest, and piggish. Princeton University protesters disrupting former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett׳s 2025 speech, then calling fellow students ״inbred swine,״ amid all the images of Israelis as vampires, bloodsuckers, and serpents, update the dehumanizing stereotypes so central to monstrous antisemitism, exaggerating Jews׳ alleged evil as the great threat to the world.

״Enlightened״ Europeans, asserting their nationalist pride, accused the Jews of ״dual loyalty.״ While burning American, Canadian, British, and Australian flags, anti-Zionist protesters impudently recycled the same charge of treason, updating paranoid antisemitism, never trusting ״them,״ fearing the Jew as the ultimate other, never fully assimilating.

As Zionism grew in the early 1900s, Eastern European bigots yelled, ״go back to Palestine!״ Today, when anti-Zionists yell ״go back to Europe,״ updating expulsionary antisemitism, it׳s fair to wonder where the ״wandering Jew״ will ever be welcome – other than in the Jewish homeland.

In 1903, the Czarist secret police published their forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. They imagined an ״IZC,״ an International Zionist Conspiracy. Today, this favorite book of the Nazis – and the neo-Nazis – is distributed throughout the Arab world, proving the world is round: far left and far right meet in updating conspiratorial antisemitism.

From 1939 through 1945, the Nazis and their collaborators killed six million Jews to ״purge the world of this menace.״ When haters accuse Israeli Jews of becoming Nazis – even as other bigots deny the Holocaust happened, minimize it, or celebrate the mass murder of Jews on October 7 – and when they echo Nazi cries to murder the Jews ״from the river to the sea״ – they are updating genocidal antisemitism.

And, at its most basic, harking back to ancient times, reaching to today׳s schoolyard taunts, violent assaults on tourists and soccer fans, and terrorist murders, yelling ״free Palestine״ to justify attacking Jews updates violent Jew-hatred.

With accusations of ״Zionist״ money, power, media manipulation, treachery, and disloyalty reverberating in France, England, the U.S., Canada, and elsewhere, the fight against Israel has given Jew-hatred a new life, in so many mutations.

Zionophobia – All Bigotry Threatens Democracy and Decency

In 1948, 10,000 Jews lived in Lebanon; today, barely 200 remain. Iran׳s Jewish community, once 100,000-strong, dwindled to under 8,000. Lebanon borders Israel, but Iran׳s capital, Tehran, is 968 miles from Jerusalem. Antisemitism׳s centrality to Iranian and Hezbollah jihadists highlights two perennial questions, which have launched hundreds of academic treatises and thousands of late-into-the-night debates: ״Why the Jews?״ and ״How did the Jews survive so much for so long?״

Antisemitism is the longest hatred partly by its sheer longevity – whatever their secret, be it divine inspiration, defining texts, family values, a rigid-yet-adaptable culture, a sense of national mission, sheer stubbornness – Jews have survived since ancient times, to be targeted still.

The plasticity of antisemitism, far left to far right, among Marxists and capitalists, among pro-Trump White supremacists and progressive universalists, among monotheistic Islamists and atheistic Marxists, is more vexing. Although constituting only a sliver of the world׳s population, Jews are prominent enough to attract the attention of bigots – for standing out and fitting in. Jews have long insisted on staying distinct, while many Jews also understood how to adapt to different societies worldwide. That made them excellent targets. In 1933, Rabbi Milton Steinberg explained in The Atlantic why Jews had survived until then by noting: ״The ideas and ideals of a people may give it significance, but its group habits give it life.״ Doing Jewish has been the key to being Jewish. Alas, doing Jewish has long triggered haters who hate difference into beating Jews.

Jew-hatred spikes when societies are under stress and totalitarian thought is rising. When people start doubting one another, judging one another, thinking in all-or-nothing terms, they seek scapegoats – or embrace absolutist demagogues who vilify minorities. Over centuries, when such pressures emerge and there are Jews around, the scapegoating expresses itself in particular ways. That׳s why Jews keep getting accused of being threats to the status quo, of seeking power and money, of being satanic. While each expression of prejudice is despicable in its own way, antisemites often connect to lies and stereotypes already festering in an historical bank of accusations and stereotypes.

Tom Khaled Würdemann notes the utopian streak uniting most antisemites. They imagine, ״if only we can eliminate the Jews, then all will be well.״ That makes Jew-hatred so useful to bigots and demagogues: resting on well-established lies, it can be constantly updated.

America׳s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism during the Biden years, Professor Deborah Lipstadt, warned that ״Anybody who buys into the conspiracy myth – which is the cornerstone of antisemitism – that Jews control the media, banks, government elections, anybody who believes that, has given up on democracy.״ Equally dangerous these days is the silenced majority, more and more who don׳t stand up when Jewish friends, neighbors, dormmates, are threatened. That׳s not just a ״threat to democracy,״ it׳s a threat to decency. Alas, the massive mass media pile-on against Israel as the Gaza War persisted, ״almost normalized״ antisemitism, Lipstadt warned – as Israel, Zionists, and Jews were deemed automatically guilty – and regretted.