Second thoughts: Trump as the as recipient of the Israel Prize?

President Trump, with all that he has done for Israel as an ally during wartime. , remains the primary diplomatic supporter of Qatar which the US Department of Education has documented as the leading foreign funder of US education .

Yet According to ISGAP, the Interdisciplinary Research Center dedicated to the Academic study of antisemitism, Qatar remains the prime funder of anti-semitic, anti-israel and pro-terror groups in the billions. Qatar has no problem acknowledging its role as a key funder of this rampant international indoctrination against Jews.

Now President Trump has been nominated for the Israel prize , awarded each year on ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE DAY.

The Israel government criteria for the Israel Prize are clear:

A candidate typically must…

  • Be an Israeli citizen (rare exceptions exist)
  • Demonstrate exceptional achievement in their field

Made a significant contribution to Israeli society, culture, science, or national life

  • Possess a body of work with long-term impact (not just one success)

However, Trump has not yet to show leadership in the fight against antisemitism – the plague now affecting Jews around the world – with Qatar as its main backer. If Trump was a true friend of Israel, he would do well to fight Qatar and not to declare it as its most US trusted ally.

As a gesture of good will, Trump could insist that Qatar cease and desist from its trades against the Jewish state. That includes Qatari funding of Jihadi education.

The Israel Prize ceremony on Israel Independence day could provide the perfect opportunity to remind the US President of the American government commitment , since the 1993 Oslo Peace accords, signed on the White house law, which obligates the Palestinians to cancel the PLO charter of total war with the Jews. Each US president has ignored that commitment. Perhaps Donald Trump, as a recipient of the Israel Prize, would now honor that American commitment?

A futile exercise

A “futile exercise” is an action, attempt, or endeavour that is completely pointless, useless, or unlikely to succeed.

It describes a task that wastes time and effort because it produces no results or fails to achieve its intended goal.

This definition succinctly sums up frantic attempts to engage the Islamic occupiers of Iran in a meaningful dialogue with the aim of somehow preventing their jihadist agenda from acquiring nuclear weapons and terrorising all those who oppose it.

One had only to look closely at who was actually pushing for these “negotiations” to realise that the whole exercise was a charade from the very beginning.

Pakistan has promoted itself as the latest knight in shining armour, aiming to bring peace and goodwill to the world. In the process, it hopes to gain the White House’s appreciation and earn credit for its seemingly sincere endeavours. In reality, this nuclear-empowered Islamic nation is far from the peaceful dove it strives so valiantly to portray. Apart from the fact that it poses a threat to India, its fanatical obsession against the Jewish State should automatically disqualify it as any sort of “neutral” mediator.

Pakistan does not recognise Israel as a legal country with any right to exist. Its defence minister recently declared that Israel is a “genocidal country” and a “curse for humanity.”  Coming on the eve of Yom Hashoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day), this foul language exposes their real agenda. After an uproar from Jerusalem, the statement was deleted from social media, but of course, by then the message was perfectly clear.

Only habitual Jew haters and complicit followers would be fooled into believing that Pakistan is any sort of suitable facilitator of peace and goodwill. The images of Vance and Trump tolerating this Pakistani hypocrisy are jarring.

Another so-called mediator is Turkey, whose anti-Israel credentials certainly qualify it for this coveted position.

Erdogan, the latter-day Ottoman sultan, has described Israel’s Prime Minister as the “Hitler of our times.” He has also expressed the belief that Turkey could invade Israel at any time it desires. These expressions of “goodwill” certainly make him a natural “neutral” and seeker of peaceful relations.

Without a shadow of a doubt, the fact that Pakistan and Turkey are embraced by the Iranian Islamic regime tells you all you need to know about the lunacy of the situation.

The fact that the Americans are also so easily bewitched makes one wonder where it will all end up. There are already whispers of further “talks” to extend the ceasefire and no doubt dangle more concessions.

Any student of history can tell you that negotiating with tyrannical regimes is a lost cause and can only end in disastrous results.

By their very nature, deceiving and lying are standard negotiating tactics employed to delay and defy. Iran has been masterful at using these tools for the last five decades.

They have learnt that democracies with no backbone, appeasers and weak-kneed politicians can be lulled into believing that peace can be purchased.

The Mullahs of Tehran have seen how North Korea was able to bluff its way to nuclear status and continues to threaten murderous mayhem. If North Korea can successfully continue to literally get away with murder, then why can’t Iran do the same?

Just as Hitler took advantage of the democracies’ craven desire to avoid confrontation in the face of evil, the Mullah regime is following the same scenario. Starmer of the UK declares that freedom of the Strait of Hormuz is important, but then in the next breath refuses to do anything other than mouth inane platitudes.

The bottom line is that the Iranians know all they have to do is shlep out the drama for as long as possible.

Doing that guarantees certain probabilities.

Causing economic mayhem will cause the craven EU, UN and others to surrender and agree to Iranian demands.

Political mayhem in the American midterms will start an isolationist revolt in the Republican Party, and the campaign against Iranian terror will unravel. Suggestions of a five-year moratorium on Iranian nuclear development are an indication of possibly kicking the problem down the road again. With the prospect of a new US administration in two years’ time being distinctly cool on Israel, the Iranians have everything to play for in their strategic duplicitous agenda.

Oppression and executions in Iran will increase, and the Islamic regime will survive and continue its deceptive march towards nuclear terror status and terror proxy patronage.

Each and every so-called ceasefire will be used to rearm and reorganise for the inevitable next round. The longer the ceasefires drag on, the more opportunities there will be for deception and evasion. Pulling the wool over the eyes of democracies desperate for an easy way out is an old tactic guaranteed to produce the desired results from all those befuddled by reality.

Despite this clear and well-worn path of deception, there will still be voices advocating “dialogue and diplomacy” as the only way forward. Protesters will be out in force, and Christian religious leaders will remain silent or complicit in the face of impending disaster.

This week, Jews worldwide gathered to commemorate the Shoah and its catastrophic impact.

Most of the world has tuned out as far as the lessons of those years are concerned and this is what makes current developments so dangerous for Israel and Jewish Communities in the Diaspora.

Of course, some politicians will make all the right noises proclaiming their fervent desire to combat Jew hate in its latest incarnation, but their annual exhortations will fall on increasingly deaf ears.

A failure to actually tackle the rising scourge, combined with continual condemnations of Israel as a facilitator of “genocide” and an “illegal occupier” among other cardinal sins, steadily reinforces in the minds of an ignorant and ill-informed public negative connotations and stereotypes.

Countries such as Spain and Ireland are leaders of the anti-Israel pack. The former, under its current leftist coalition, is reverting to age-old libels and basically branding the Jewish State as a pariah of the international community.

Ireland, meanwhile, wallows in anti-Israel policies. Its one-sided obsession has now resulted in a Dublin fundraising event for Magen David Adom being cancelled. Apparently, according to Irish supporters of the PLO, Israel’s first responders are guilty of “genocidal” policies. Anyone who knows anything about MDA would realise that this is just another slanderous accusation, but for those already conditioned to think the worst about Zionists, it is the gospel truth.

Starmer, Carney and Macron all profess friendship, but their rhetoric, almost on a daily basis, against Israel merely reinforces the negative perceptions among a public already saturated with poisonous and pernicious accusations.

On Yom Hashoah, the sirens wailed, and most Israelis stood in silent memory of the six million Jewish martyrs murdered by the German Nazi regime and its not inconsiderable band of willing accomplices. The German Chancellor chose the eve of this event to berate Israel for allowing Jews to live in Judea and Samaria. When Israel’s Finance Minister slammed this attempt at telling Jews where they cannot live he was pilloried for being “undiplomatic.”

Unfortunately, being diplomatic has seldom helped Jews in the past.

To top off another vintage week in international double standards and raging hypocrisy, a report in the London Jewish Chronicle must win first prize.

It encapsulates precisely why Iran feels confident that it can outsmart and outfox all those who believe that talks, dialogue and diplomacy are the only way to usher in an era of eternal love and peace.

Dozens of countries, including the United Kingdom, have made the mind-boggling decision to nominate Iran to join a UN committee responsible for shaping policy around human rights, despite the Islamic Republic last year carrying out the largest number of executions in almost four decades.

Iran will become a new member country on the UN’s Committee for Programme and Coordination after being selected by the body’s Economic and Social Council, which comprises 54 nations, including the UK, Australia, France and Canada. The US was the only country to object, on the basis that Iran along with Cuba and Nicaragua, which were also elected to the committee – were “unfit.”

The committee is scheduled to meet next month when it is due to discuss gender equality and women’s empowerment, human rights, disarmament and terrorism prevention.”  

A more blatant example of an exercise in futility would be hard to find.

Palestinian Authority security forces are ‘building offensive force for surprise attack’

A new investigative report by the Regavim Movement warns that the Palestinian Authority Security Forces (PASF) function as a “shadow army” capable of posing a major threat to Israel, prompting calls from officials and security experts for an urgent review of the findings.

According to the March 24 report, “The Writing is on the Wall (of Jericho),” the Palestinian Authority is developing what Regavim describes as a “terror army in the heart of the state,” capable of launching a surprise attack on Israel on a scale far greater than the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas assault.

“At any moment, the Palestinian Authority Security Forces may mobilize against us, and the events of Oct. 7 will seem like a walk in the park in comparison,” Naomi Linder Kahn, director of the International Division of Regavim, told JNS on Tuesday.

According to the report, the PASF has evolved far beyond its intended role as a civilian police force under the 1995 Oslo II framework, which capped its size at 30,000 personnel equipped primarily with light arms for law enforcement duties.

Regavim alleges that the force now numbers approximately 65,000 combat-trained personnel, including individuals with past terror convictions, and possesses weaponry suited for offensive operations, including grenade launchers, machine guns, armored vehicles and armor-piercing munitions.

The report also reveals that P.A. personnel have received advanced military training abroad, including officer and command training in Russia; armored, tank and artillery instruction in Pakistan; and tactical parachuting training in Egypt and Italy.

According to Regavim, training facilities in Jordan and Jericho—described publicly as centers for civilian policing—conduct exercises that include live-fire from high-speed all-terrain motorcycles, urban-warfare drills, and breaching operations involving explosives, capabilities the group says are indicative of preparations for combat rather than law enforcement.

“Every inch of the State of Israel is in danger, and we demand that the State of Israel act swiftly and decisively to prevent the nightmare scenario for which the Palestinian Authority has been training its troops for decades,” Kahn said.

The cover of the new Regavim report on the Palestinian Authority Security Forces, March 2026. Credit: Regavim.
The cover of the new Regavim report on the Palestinian Authority Security Forces, March 2026. Credit: Regavim.

‘A clear and present danger’

Yisrael Ganz, governor of the Binyamin Regional Council and chairman of the Yesha Council, described the report as “a wake-up call,” warning that the PASF represents “a clear and present danger.”

Ganz urged the Israeli government and security establishment to carefully review the findings and ensure that the security of residents in Binyamin, and of all Israeli citizens, relies first and foremost on the Israel Defense Forces operating with full freedom of action throughout Judea and Samaria.

“At the same time, the council is working and will continue to work to strengthen security components in the communities and to increase readiness on the ground, in full coordination with security authorities,” he added.

Lt. Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch, director of the Initiative for Palestinian Authority Accountability and Reform at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs and former director of military prosecution for Judea and Samaria, told JNS the PASF should be viewed as a fully developed army.

He noted that approximately 6,000 terrorists participated in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led massacre and warned that what he described as “the P.A. terror army” is significantly larger and better trained.

“If Israel does not take immediate steps to dismantle the terror army, the next massacre, which will be much greater in scale, is just a matter of time,” Hirsch said.

A longtime security official from the Binyamin region, who requested anonymity, suggested the PASF could also be deployed internally by the Palestinian Authority to confront Israeli civilians entering Palestinian Authority-controlled areas following terror attacks.

He warned the findings could signal the potential for widespread escalation in Judea and Samaria, including the possibility of another full-scale intifada.

A Regavim spokesperson added that statements by P.A. officials expressing aspirations to “return” to Israeli cities, including Haifa, Jaffa, Tiberias and Beersheva, undermine the perception of the Palestinian Authority as a moderate partner.

“Relying on the Palestinian Authority as a partner or subcontractor for security in Judea and Samaria, or as a legitimate alternative for the ‘day after’ in Gaza, paves the way for the next disaster,” the spokesperson said. “Israel’s security must rest solely on its own strength and sovereignty.”

Tell Me Who Your Mediator Is — And I Will Tell You Who You Are

To understand where the war is heading, we must first identify who is mediating between Iran and the United States — and whom those mediators represent. The principal mediator is Pakistan. Why Pakistan? For several reasons: every Arab state is a party to the conflict and therefore cannot serve as a neutral broker. But beyond that, Pakistan is bound to China — and the power standing behind this mediation track is China. In other words, Pakistan is mediating between the United States and China, with China expected to deliver Iran’s agreement and thereby bring the war to an end.

Whatever the eventual arrangement, if China is the party that brokers it, Beijing will emerge with enhanced standing in the Gulf. If this is achieved in partnership with Pakistan, it will strengthen the China–Pakistan axis and, in turn, deepen Pakistan’s ties with Iran. This is something Saudi Arabia cannot accept — and it is the backdrop to the direct talks that recently opened between Iran and Oman. The meeting held at the beginning of this week in Mascat was not designed to produce an agreement; it was designed to establish a competing axis to Pakistan’s. In the end, Iran came to Mascat to propose dividing the transit revenues through the Strait of Hormuz — an offer Oman could not accept, and was never intended to.

So where does Saudi Arabia fit in this equation? Riyadh is not speaking publicly, but behind the scenes it is assembling a new regional architecture — one designed not merely to confront Iran, but to block China. Last week, President Trump was expected to deliver statements in which he would fulfil his promise to end the war, declaring that the Strait of Hormuz is “not our problem.” He pulled back. Reports have circulated that Saudi Arabia persuaded him not to withdraw from the arena, not to cede a foothold in the Gulf to China — and, by extension, not to allow the Pakistani mediation track to succeed.

For Trump to listen, Saudi Arabia need only refresh a set of longstanding unfulfilled pledges: investing one trillion dollars in the American economy, assisting with oil prices, advancing normalization with Israel, and participating actively in military operations against Iran.

If the China–Pakistan track is unacceptable to Saudi Arabia, what track could it support? In all likelihood, an axis running through India, the Arabian Peninsula, Jordan, and Israel — precisely because that framework incorporates normalization with Israel.

Why not the track Turkey is pressing for — rerouting the energy corridor through Ankara, positioning Turkey as Europe’s energy terminal?

For both practical and historical reasons. Beginning with the practical: Europe is not prepared to trade one dependency for another. It has barely extricated itself from Putin. But history matters here too, because it bears directly on the power structure within the Peninsula — and particularly on the long-running, visceral rivalry between the House of Saud and Qatar’s Tamim tribe.

Tamim bin Hamad is not merely the Emir of Qatar; he harbors ambitions to lead and speak for the Tamim tribal tribes — a grouping that includes many princes of the House of Saud, though they are barred from succession, which is reserved exclusively for the Aniza tribe.

During the House of Saud’s long campaign to consolidate control over the Peninsula, the Ottoman Empire backed the Tamim — and since nothing is more current than history, a revived Turkey–Qatar alignment at so sensitive a moment poses a genuine strategic threat to Riyadh.

One of the fundamental questions still to be resolved is whether the water separating the Arabian Peninsula from Iran should be called the Arabian Gulf or the Persian Gulf. Accepting Iran’s conditions regarding the Strait of Hormuz would be tantamount to the world endorsing the Persian designation. This would carry far-reaching future implications for Iranian territorial and political claims vis-à-vis the Peninsula states — and that alone is sufficient motivation for Saudi Arabia to block the Pakistani mediation track.

The Arabian Gulf designation also carries implications for Saudi engagement with Ahwaz. The coastline opposite the Arabian Peninsula is Arab-populated territory under Persian rule. Saudi Arabia has, until now, refrained from intervening in Ahwaz. That restraint may no longer be sustainable. Military involvement is not the expectation — but support for the Arab underground seeking liberation is.

In truth, the Arab underground in Ahwaz has already approached Israel for assistance — and Israel showed no interest. It is somewhat puzzling that Israel went to war to bring about regime change in Iran while ignoring various opposition movements that sought its support and received none.

On normalization: Saudi Arabia is demanding that Israel demonstrate progress on the Palestinian issue. The current Israeli government, however, is using the Palestinian question as a tool for generating tension, while Riyadh is demanding de-escalation.

There are signs that Washington has accepted Saudi Arabia’s conditions. Reports indicate that the United States is now pressing Israel to halt the hill-top terror in the West Bank — including unusually direct statements from Ambassador Michael Huckabee, as pro-Israel a figure as one could conceive. And even as all eyes remain fixed on Iran, talks with Hamas over the post-war governance of Gaza continue.

Saudi Arabia will join the India–Israel axis not only to block the Pakistan–China–Iran alignment — but for that to happen, the United States must first clear another strait: the chokehold of Ben Gvir and Smotrich.

Will the U.S. Make Israel Its Middle East Headquarters?

Israel has invited the United States to relocate some of its regional bases from countries such as Qatar to Israel. But that raises a question: Why are the U.S. regional headquarters in a country that actively sponsors terrorism?

It’s a relatively recent development. For decades, Saudi Arabia served as the U.S.’s regional headquarters. It was from there—not Qatar—that the U.S. assembled forces and ultimately launched the Gulf War to liberate Kuwait. After 9/11 and the Iraq War, the U.S. sought a country with fewer political constraints and a location that would recruit fewer jihadists by being farther from Islam’s two holiest sites. Qatar fit the bill: no political complications, billions of dollars in subsidies, and the ready-to-use Al Udeid Air Base.

Now, more than 20 years later, Israel is positioning itself as the U.S.’s new home away from home in the region. The Israeli security establishment sees an opportunity to “reshape the map” of U.S. military positioning in the Middle East, reports Israel’s Channel 12.

There are several advantages to this move. For one, Israel has the strongest air defense systems in the region. The New York Times reported Wednesday that missile attacks on Qatar have forced “many American troops to relocate to hotels and office spaces throughout the region,” with much of the land-based military “fighting the war while working remotely, with the exception of fighter pilots and crews operating and maintaining warplanes and conducting strikes.” Meanwhile, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) haven’t missed a day of work.

Another advantage is the close alliance between the U.S. and Israel. They’ve been conducting joint operations, gone on foreign trips together, and built a relationship where coordination is seamless. Isn’t it time to move in together? After all, the U.S. and Israel share strategic goals in the region, and operating from Israel means the U.S. doesn’t risk hitting targets that would be rebuilt by the same country they launched from.

Add to the fact that Qatar has not always been a cooperative host. In April 2025, Qatar [along with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE)] said that they would not allow American warplanes to use Persian Gulf bases or airspace to strike Iran. Earlier this year, a prominent Qatari royal called the U.S. “merely a tenant of a military base in Qatar” and warned, “Do not act as if you are doing us a favor.” While this may have been largely rhetorical, Qatari sentiments have grown more skeptical since missile strikes began, and it is not a sentiment the U.S. is likely to encounter in Israel.

Israel is positioning itself as the U.S.’s new home away from home in the region.

But there are a few disadvantages as well, the most prominent being geographical. Israel is roughly 1,000 miles west of Qatar. Sure, that means fewer missiles can reach it, but it is more useful for the U.S. if they want to fly over Beirut—less so for strikes on Tehran.

Qatar also subsidizes the upkeep of its base to the tune of billions of dollars. Israel’s defense budget hit record highs this year, but an extra few billion is still significant for a country without endless oil wealth that has been paying for a highly active war for the past two years.

Regional allies are unlikely to be thrilled either. Some, like Turkey, would be opposed out of that early-2000s distaste for Israel, while others—Kuwait, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia—may object simply because it means American help is now farther away.

The U.S. and Israel are currently negotiating this proposal. U.S. Central Command is unlikely to fully relocate from Qatar, but there could very well be a new U.S. base established. As U.S. Secretary of State Alexander Haig famously said, Israel is “the largest American aircraft carrier in the world that cannot be sunk”—and the U.S. may finally be looking to put that to use.

Overnight, the Knesset successfully passed the largest state budget in Israel’s history. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called the NIS 850.6 billion ($271 billion) spending bill “a budget that takes care of everyone and fights the cost of living,” while opposition leader Yair Lapid called it “the greatest theft in the history of the state.” Whether Lapid is correct or not, this budget is historic.

For the first time in his nearly 20 years as prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu has successfully passed a budget in an election year—a milestone that secures the government against collapse through the end of its term. In his six previous terms, for one reason or another, he never reached this point. Even if the ultra-Orthodox were to bring down the coalition in the next legislative session, the earliest elections that could be held would be in September—just one month short of the government’s full term. This makes the current Knesset the longest-serving government Israel has had since 1969. That’s right: more than 50 years. Israeli politics has a long-standing tradition of chaos and self-destruction.

Yet history doesn’t come cheap. At the last moment, the coalition approved amendments allocating approximately NIS 800 million ($255 million) to Haredi programs and institutions. This was compensation for the ultra-Orthodox parties’ support, as they voted in favor of the budget despite the coalition not enacting the blanket exemptions from military conscription for yeshiva students that they had demanded.

According to Channel 13, the budget increased allocations to Haredi educational institutions by more than NIS 1 billion ($318 million). But the Haredim weren’t the biggest beneficiaries of the night—the defense budget received a NIS 28 billion ($9 billion) raise, bringing it to NIS 143 billion ($45.8 billion). That’s double the 2022 allocation.

Last night was also historic in that, for the first time, nearly the entire Knesset had to vote from protected spaces as Jerusalem came under fire. I’m not sure if Iran was planning on preventing the IDF from being funded, but firing missiles isn’t exactly the way to convince a country to cut its defense spending.

Also in Jerusalem yesterday, police prevented the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem from praying at the Holy Sepulchre on Palm Sunday. Have Tucker Carlson’s fantasies finally become a reality? Has Israel finally started persecuting Christians?

Not quite.

I have a rule: Whenever a minister is involved, the situation falls into one of two categories—House of Cards or Saturday Night Live. This was SNL. Simply put, the police in the Old City didn’t fully understand the sensitivity of the issue and were following Home Front Command directives to prevent large gatherings. Before the situation could be clarified, the story went viral, and everyone started offering their takes—some claiming Israel was persecuting Christians, others, if Israeli, blaming the current government.

The whole issue was resolved within a day. This morning, police announced that limited numbers would be allowed into the Holy Sepulchre. For context, Home Front Command directives also currently prevent prayers on the Temple Mount or at the Western Wall, and neither has caused an international incident.

One of the first stories that I heard in 1970, my first year in Israel

A well-known exchange, between David Ben-Gurion and U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in 1954, captures something most people still don’t understand.

Dulles reportedly challenged Ben-Gurion, asking how Israel could claim to represent one people after 2,000 years of exile, scattered across continents, cultures, and languages. It’s a fair question, if you think a nation is defined only by land.

Ben-Gurion’s response reframed everything. He suggested that Dulles go out and find ten American children and ask them simple questions about the Mayflower, who was the captain, how long was the journey, what did they eat. Most wouldn’t know.

Then he said, go find ten Jewish children, anywhere in the world, and ask them who took the Jews out of Egypt, how long it took to reach the Land of Israel, what they ate in the desert, and what happened when they reached the sea. And you will get answers.

Not because of trivia, because of memory. Because across continents, languages, and centuries, the Jewish people carried the same story, told the same way, around the same table, year after year.

A nation is not only geography. It is continuity. It is shared narrative. It is ritual lived in real time.

Empires rise and fall on power. The Jewish people endured on memory.

That is what nationhood looks like when it is built not only on land, but on memory.

How can we address antisemitism

Aliyah Soars Despite Hamas War

Defying Fear, Embracing Zion

The air raid sirens wail, a stark reminder of the ever-present threat. Yet, even as rockets streak across the Israeli sky and the echoes of war reverberate, a powerful testament to the enduring spirit of Zionism unfolds: North American Jews are continuing to make Aliyah, immigrating to Israel in numbers that defy the anxieties of the moment. This isn’t simply a relocation; it’s a profound statement of faith, resilience, and an unshakeable belief in the future of the Jewish homeland.

While some might assume that the recent conflict would deter potential immigrants, the reality is far more nuanced. Yes, there is apprehension, a natural human response to danger. But for many North American Jews, the desire to be part of the Israeli story, to contribute to its growth and security, outweighs the perceived risks. The shared sense of purpose, the feeling of belonging to a nation fighting for its survival, has become a powerful magnet.

“We are seeing a continued interest in Aliyah, and in some cases, even an increase,” says Rabbi Yehoshua Fass, Executive Director of Nefesh B’Nefesh, an organization that facilitates Aliyah from North America. “People understand that Israel is not just a place, but a people, and they want to be a part of that people, especially during challenging times.”

The Pull of Shared Destiny

Several factors contribute to this unwavering commitment. Firstly, the deep-rooted connection to Jewish history and heritage remains a powerful motivator. For generations, Jews have yearned to return to their ancestral land, and the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 fulfilled a centuries-old dream. This historical imperative continues to resonate strongly, inspiring many to make the move, regardless of the current security situation. According to a 2023 Pew Research Center study, 82% of American Jews feel at least some connection to Israel, with a significant percentage feeling very attached. This emotional bond transcends geopolitical considerations.

Secondly, the rise of antisemitism in North America and Europe is undeniably a contributing factor. A recent report by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) revealed a staggering 388% increase in antisemitic incidents in the United States following the October 7th attacks. This alarming trend has left many Jews feeling vulnerable and exposed in their diaspora communities, prompting them to seek refuge and security in Israel, where they believe they will be safer and more accepted.

Furthermore, the strong sense of community and mutual support within Israel is a significant draw. New immigrants often speak of the warmth and acceptance they experience upon arrival, the feeling of being surrounded by people who understand their values and share their aspirations. This sense of belonging is particularly important during times of crisis, when the support of family, friends, and neighbors can make all the difference. Organizations like Nefesh B’Nefesh and the Jewish Agency for Israel provide comprehensive support to new immigrants, helping them navigate the complexities of settling in a new country and building a new life.

Beyond the Headlines: The Real Stories

The statistics tell one story, but the individual narratives paint an even more compelling picture. Consider the story of Sarah and David, a young couple from Toronto who had been planning their Aliyah for years. When the war broke out, their families urged them to reconsider, fearing for their safety. But Sarah and David were resolute. They felt a deep sense of responsibility to be in Israel during this difficult time, to stand in solidarity with their fellow Jews. They arrived in Tel Aviv just weeks after the attacks, determined to contribute to the war effort and build a life in their new homeland. Sarah, a trained nurse, volunteered at a local hospital, while David, an engineer, joined a team working on developing new defense technologies.

Then there’s the story of elderly Holocaust survivor, Ruth, who had always dreamed of making Aliyah but felt it was too late in her life. However, the recent surge in antisemitism and the events of October 7th rekindled her desire to return to the land of her ancestors. With the help of her grandchildren and Nefesh B’Nefesh, she finally made the move, finding solace and comfort in being surrounded by other Jews who understood her history and shared her hopes for the future. Ruth now lives in a retirement community in Jerusalem, where she spends her days sharing her story and connecting with younger generations.

These are just two examples of the many inspiring stories of North American Jews who are choosing to make Aliyah despite the challenges. Their courage, determination, and unwavering commitment to Israel are a testament to the enduring power of Zionism.

Economic Realities and Future Prospects

Beyond the emotional and spiritual factors, economic considerations also play a role in the decision to make Aliyah. While the cost of living in Israel can be high, particularly in major cities like Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, there are also significant economic opportunities, especially in the tech sector. Israel is a global hub for innovation and entrepreneurship, attracting talent from around the world. Many North American Jews, particularly those with skills and experience in high-tech industries, see Aliyah as a chance to advance their careers and build a better future for their families. A 2022 study by the Israel Innovation Authority found that approximately 25% of Israeli startups were founded by immigrants.

Furthermore, the Israeli government offers a range of financial incentives and support programs to encourage Aliyah. These include tax breaks, housing subsidies, and assistance with finding employment. These programs can make a significant difference in the financial viability of Aliyah, particularly for those who are starting from scratch. In 2023, the Ministry of Aliyah and Integration allocated over 1.5 billion shekels to support new immigrants, demonstrating the government’s commitment to facilitating Aliyah.

The long-term economic impact of Aliyah is also significant. New immigrants bring with them valuable skills, knowledge, and experience, which contribute to the growth and development of the Israeli economy. They also create jobs and stimulate demand for goods and services. A 2019 study by the Bank of Israel estimated that each new immigrant contributes an average of 200,000 shekels to the Israeli economy over their lifetime.

Challenges and Adaptations

Of course, Aliyah is not without its challenges. Adapting to a new culture, learning a new language, and navigating a different bureaucracy can be daunting. New immigrants often face difficulties finding suitable housing, securing employment, and integrating into Israeli society. The language barrier can be particularly challenging, especially for those who do not speak Hebrew fluently. However, with the help of support organizations and the willingness to embrace new experiences, these challenges can be overcome.

Moreover, the ongoing security situation in Israel presents unique challenges for new immigrants. The threat of rocket attacks, terrorist attacks, and regional conflicts can be unsettling, particularly for those who are not accustomed to living in a conflict zone. However, Israelis have developed a remarkable resilience in the face of adversity, and new immigrants quickly learn to adapt to the security realities of life in Israel. They also find comfort and support in the strong sense of community and mutual aid that exists within Israeli society.

“We are committed to providing new immigrants with the support they need to overcome these challenges and build successful lives in Israel,” says Rabbi Fass. “We believe that Aliyah is not just good for the individual, but also good for the State of Israel.”

A Future Forged in Unity

The decision to make Aliyah is a deeply personal one, driven by a complex mix of motivations. But for North American Jews, the current conflict has served to underscore the importance of solidarity and shared destiny. As rockets fall and tensions rise, they are choosing to stand with Israel, not just in spirit, but in person. Their presence reinforces the strength and resilience of the Jewish state, sending a clear message that despite the challenges, the dream of a secure and prosperous homeland for the Jewish people will endure. The current war has led to a 12% increase in Aliyah inquiries compared to the same period last year, demonstrating the growing desire to connect with Israel during times of crisis.

In the face of adversity, the unwavering commitment of North American Jews to Aliyah serves as a beacon of hope and a testament to the enduring power of the Zionist dream. It’s a story of courage, resilience, and an unshakeable belief in the future of Israel. As Israel navigates these turbulent times, the influx of new immigrants brings not only fresh perspectives and skills but also a renewed sense of purpose and determination. The act of making Aliyah during wartime is a powerful statement of solidarity, a declaration that the Jewish people will continue to build and thrive in their ancestral homeland, no matter the challenges they face. The future of Israel is being forged not only on the battlefield but also in the hearts and minds of those who choose to make it their home.