Special Envoy to the Middle East Undermines America First Agenda

Two months ago, then-President-Elect Donald Trump, with his special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff by his side, reiterated: “If those hostages aren’t back … by the time I get into office, all hell will break out in the Middle East.” His often-repeated statement gave hope to all seeking the release of the 98 Israeli hostages (including three with dual American citizenship) in Hamas captivity in Gaza since October 7, 2023.

It seemed President Trump wished to repeat the scene of the 52 Americans who were abducted by supporters of the Iranian Revolution on November 4, 1979, and released on Ronald Reagan’s inauguration day on January 20, 1981, though without publicly acknowledged blackmail payments. So, on January 5, 2025, he sent his long time friend and real estate developer Steve Witkoff to kick-start the stalled negotiations with Hamas in Doha, Qatar, alongside the Biden administration team.

On January 17, the Israeli government was pressured to sign a bad, complicated, and illogical ceasefire agreement, that was inconsistent with the philosophy of the new Trump administration. An extra bit of irony is that the “all hell” threat was supposed to be directed to Hamas, Qatar, and Iran, but not to Israel.

The deal includes three phases of ceasefire (the first 2 phases to last 42 days each). The first phase will see 33 hostages, including “women, children, elderly men, and individuals with critical medical needs”, released by Hamas. On Sunday, January 19, only two of the three American captives of Hamas were released. In return, Israel released hundreds of Hamas terrorists. The agreement also allowed 600 trucks with humanitarian aid to enter Gaza daily, under Hamas control.

Three weeks into the ceasefire, Israeli forces will be required to limit their presence to only key routes, and displaced northern Gazans will be allowed to return, with vehicle inspection taking  place under “Qatari Egyptian supervision“, instead of trustworthy Israeli supervision.

On day 22, the IDF will withdraw from the Netzarim corridor (which cuts Gaza in half) to a buffer zone 500 meters wide along the border with Israel. In total, some 30 Hamas terrorists will be released for each returned Israeli hostage, for a total of 3,000 Hamas terrorists. Senior terrorists will be deported to Qatar and Turkey, but the vast majority will be deported to Judea and Samaria, in the heart of Israel. America and Egypt will guarantee the deal. (See more details here)

Historically, about 80% of released terrorists return to terrorism. Israel’s domestic security force, Shin Bet, has said that 60% return to terror financing and 20% return to direct physical terror. Thus, at least 600 of the freed terrorists will continue their efforts to kill as many Israelis, including Americans, as they can. This deal guarantees a forever war with Gaza and radical Islam (Hamas) instead of a victory for Israel.

Why was Israel forced to accept such a bad deal when a much better deal could have been negotiated one month later, aided by the threat of force? Why did America push Israel to accept a deal that is so unfavorable to America’s long-term interests? Why did America push for a deal designed by the failed Biden administration, which was also favorable to radical Muslim Brotherhood countries such as Qatar and Turkey? What mistakes were made by the American negotiators, particularly by Steve Witkoff?

Save The West can only guess:

1) Witkoff was so eager to close a deal by January 19 to please his boss that he felt that he had to pressure US ally Israel rather than the unrelenting radical Islamic US enemy Hamas and its financial supporters, Qatar and Iran.

2) Witkoff did not properly consider the ramifications of the deal to US long-term foreign policy.

3) The full Trump national security team was focused on confirmation hearings in the Senate and could not focus adequately on this issue.

4) The staff surrounding Trump wanted to please his determination to “end the war”. Moreover, they didn’t have the courage to question the mistakes of his overzealous negotiator.

5) The happy prospects of facilitating the joyous release of these hostages very early in President Trump’s new term clouded the vision of his staff, who worked so hard to get him re-elected.

6) Witkoff had close financial dealings with Qatar and clearly overlooked Qatar’s financing of the global Muslim Brotherhood, which spreads anti-Christian and antisemitic propaganda through the al Jazeera propaganda TV outlet.

7) Having no real knowledge of the Middle East, but with financial links to Qatar, Witkoff did not understand that this deal re-invigorates the radical Islamic enemies of America (Iran and its proxies, as well as its proxies, Qatar and Turkey) in their quest to take over the Middle East and then the World.

8) Witkoff was apparently unaware that he was not ending the Israel war with Hamas/Iran, but turning it into an endless war, in violation of the Trump Doctrine to end “forever wars”.

9) Witkoff also abandoned the Trump Doctrine of “peace through strength”. Instead, he adopted the Democrat notion of peace through appeasement, which always leads to war.

10) Witkoff abandoned the Trump Doctrine of “America First.” Instead, he opted for Biden-Democratic policy of choosing Qatar and Hamas First. But the majority of Americans voted out the disgraced Democrat Pro-Communists/Islamists and their false narratives.

11) Witkoff ignored the Trump doctrine of “winning so often, that we will get tired of winning.”

12) Witkoff ignored the Trump doctrine of not overpaying for hostages.

13) Witkoff impaired the future success of the potential Abraham Accords expansion by appearing so weak and abandoning America’s only true ally in the Middle East.

14) WitKoff is facilitating the return of Gaza to Hamas, thereby forcing the residents of Gaza to live forever under the brutal rule of the Hamas Muslim Brotherhood Death Cult, instead of gaining some semblance of freedom under Israeli rule or, perhaps, the rule of Saudi Arabia and/or the UAE. We guess that the silent majority of American Muslim voters will be very disappointed by the prospect of such ongoing cruelty against their brethren.

So, how can the new Trump Administration recover from this major strategic blunder after the limited positive short-term glow of the hostage release fades? This hostage fiasco will cause allies to distrust the new Administration and enemies to not fear it.

1) Fire Steve Witkoff immediately, to set an example for future diplomats who ignore the noble aspects of the America First Trump Doctrine.

2) Review the vetting process to find out why Witkoff’s conflict of interest with Qatar was not detected. And why was he granted a National Security clearance?

3) Appoint a senior leader for a new Department of Policy Co-ordination (DOPC) so that rogue and incompetent appointees cannot subvert the Trump Doctrine.

4) Immediately purge all national security appointees who have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood (Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan) or Iran and its domestic sympathizers.

The new highly competent National Security team will now have lots of extra work to do to re-establish American national security credibility and the Trump Doctrine of America First. Let’s make America Great and Powerful Again!

Nauseous nonsense

The definition of nausea is “a feeling of sickness with an inclination to vomit.”

Subsequent frantic attempts by politicians and officials to justify this “deal” and idiotic pronouncements by the international community have been enough to induce a mass case of queasiness.

It must be stated at the outset that the return of the hostages is of the highest priority. This includes not only the living and the dead but also the bodies of soldiers and civilians who were kidnapped several years ago and cruelly held in the hell of Gaza. No justification whatsoever can be made for the sort of terrorist blackmail now being enacted.

Anything short of the return of every single illegally taken Israeli should be completely unacceptable. The very notion that terrorist murderers and rapists are able to control a drip-feed release of hostages is obscene. We now face a scandalous situation whereby Hamas and its allies can turn the screws resulting in anguished families wondering when they will ever see still-held loved ones.

The fact that the release of the hostages is being shlepped out means that at any stage, blackmail tactics will be employed to squeeze yet more disgusting concessions. Hamas knows only too well that all they have to do is to blame Israel for something and the international community will ride to their rescue as they have done in the past. Hypocrisy and appeasement are now the default positions of most of the UN and political leaders in democratic countries.

There is yet another nauseous component to this doubtful deal.

In exchange for the release of dead and living hostages kidnapped by Hamas and its terror associates Israel is releasing thousands of convicted terrorists from jail. These individuals have blood on their hands which means they are guilty of murdering Israeli civilians as well as IDF soldiers. Their victims were intentionally rammed with vehicles, stabbed, raped and otherwise brutally assaulted. Those murdered included the young and elderly, husbands and wives, brothers and sisters and small children and even babies.

These murderers never showed any sort of remorse. On the contrary, they remain proud of their actions. Instead, they are hailed as heroes by their respective terror patrons and lauded by the PLO and an Arab Palestinian Authority touted by the international community as peace partners.

It is these despicable specimens of humanity who are now being released and returned to their families. They are welcomed back to PA-controlled territory as conquering champions of the evil Zionist regime. Even worse, hundreds are being released into Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. One must question this act of reckless lunacy and wonder at the complete lack of backbone and self-respect that sanctioned its implementation.

This scandalous situation is made even worse when you consider the devastating effect this flood of released murderers has on the families who have lost dear ones. Put yourselves in the shoes of the widows, widowers, orphans and bereaved families. They are getting a knock on the door and the representatives of the IDF or Government inform them that the killer of their family has been released.

Making the situation even more excruciating is the fact that TV and social media are showing these murderers being feted and welcomed back into their homes. Scenes of jubilation for murdering Israelis are rubbing salt into raw wounds.

Without any doubt these released terrorists will soon be back plotting and carrying out yet more murders. That is what happened after the release of terrorists in the Shalit deal and it is 100 per cent a certainty after this current release. In effect, the murder of more Israelis is guaranteed, all enabled by those facilitating this latest charade.

How do we know that murder and mayhem will follow?

The terror facilitators have already proclaimed their future intentions.

A senior Hamas official: “the destruction of Israel remains our primary objective.”  

Hamas thanks Turkey, South Africa, Algeria, Russia, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Belgium, Spain and Ireland for their support.

The Ramallah-based Arab Palestinian kleptocracy defended, glorified and celebrated 7 October. Just in case their message was not clear enough they followed this up by slandering and smearing Israel once again: “Palestinian prisoners are held in Israeli camps which are worse than Hitler’s fascist holocaust furnaces.”

The common theme emanating from all these terror-supporting quarters is that the cease-fire is a resounding victory and merely a temporary pause in the ultimate goal of destroying Israel.

Unsurprisingly, despite this explicit message, the world’s media prefers to ignore the clear agenda and instead engages in spreading tendentious reports about the evil Israelis. Convicted murderers are lauded as innocent victims of Zionist oppression and elevated to equal status with kidnapped hostages.

As though this is not bad enough, we are forced to read, listen to and endure the most nonsensical pontifications by political officials.

According to these misinformed, uninformed and clueless individuals, peace and tolerance are about to dawn.

Despite Hamas terrorists now emerging from yet-to-be-destroyed tunnels beneath mosques, schools, clinics, hospitals and homes and the discovery of yet more weapons and rockets, the genetic hallucinatory “experts” are already proclaiming “peace in our time.”

Despite clear evidence to the contrary, Israel is being warned that unless it agrees to the creation of yet another terror state in its Biblical heartland, it will be forever branded as a threat to world peace.

The likes of Albanese, Wong and New Zealand’s Foreign Minister, Winston Peters, join the rest of the UN in burbling the most inane nonsense. A common theme is that there must now be “a massive, rapid, unimpeded flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza.”  Ignored is the stark fact that whatever aid has been and will be sent to Gaza is immediately hijacked by Hamas for its own purposes. Any deprivation suffered by locals is entirely the fault of the terror groups in charge.

Choosing to ignore this reality, befuddled politicians prefer to blame Israel and spout a myopic message of unreality.

Take this pearl from the NZ Foreign Minister: “to achieve a durable and lasting peace, we call on the parties to take meaningful steps towards a two state solution. Political will is the key to ensuring history does not repeat itself.”

Given the irrefutable stated aims of the terror groups involved and the articulated objectives of their patron, Iran, how can anyone in their right mind believe that the history of terror will not repeat itself?

It is glaringly obvious that for history NOT to be repeated, Israel must decisively put an end to the nefarious designs of its enemies.

PM Netanyahu must resign if he reaffirms his “doormat” status by withdrawing from Lebanon

PM Netanyahu must resign if he reaffirms his “doormat” status by withdrawing from Lebanon
Dr. Aaron Lerner 23 January 2025

We face many critical issues for our future, and if President Trump thinks that our leader is a “doormat,” we are doomed.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a one-time opportunity to change his “doormat” status in President Trump’s eyes.
We all understand that we must keep IDF forces in Lebanon. This is not a political issue in Israel at all.

According to media reports, instead of informing the Trump administration that we are staying in Lebanon, we asked for permission from the Trump administration to remain there, and they objected. It was a mistake to ask for permission instead of declaring our intent, but that is behind us now.

When we caved into Trump’s envoy and accepted the terms of the agreement with Hamas, Trump labeled Netanyahu as a “doormat.”

It is critical to change the designation of “doormat” for our prime minister by Mr. Trump, because a country whose leader is considered a “doormat” will not win Trump’s support on Gaza, Iran, or any other critical issue.

Therefore, with great regret, if we withdraw from Lebanon in the coming days, for the sake of us all, Netanyahu must resign in a process that immediately installs a replacement who will act decisively (e.g., annexation?) to signal to Trump that he is not a “doormat.”

To be clear: I am not looking for an excuse to remove Netanyahu. With all my heart, I want him to do the right thing, so he can continue to lead.

But if Mr. Netanyahu has resigned himself to being President Trump’s “doormat,” he must resign.

A Lesson Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach Taught David Bedein When He Was Ten Years Old

LONG BEFORE he became a full-time journalist and the director of the Center for East Policy Research, David Bedein was a social worker and community organizer, in which capacity he worked with Shlomo Carlebach on several projects. Bedein was a 10-year-old schoolboy when he first met Carlebach.

“Our Hebrew school teacher in Philadelphia brought him to sing for our fifth-grade class.

“The teacher had more than singing on his mind. Our teacher had become a devotee of Chabad-Lubavitch and was concerned that we did not know much about Judaism. We had a special request: Christmas was coming, and every year we were forced to sing Christmas carols in public school. We wanted to learn some Jewish songs. (All we knew was ‘Hava Nagila’ and ‘Zum Gali Gali.’)

“So he brought in Shlomo Carlebach to teach us. We learned some beautiful songs: ‘Borchi Nafshi,’ ‘Vechulam Mekablim,’ ‘Essa Einai’…. But more than that, Shlomo infused us with spirit – the spirit to sing with our soul.“Over the years, I got to know Shlomo in many different contexts. When I worked with youth, he would often join me for activities.

“Shortly before he died, Shlomo spent Shabbat in Efrat, where we live. I brought my then-12-year-old son, Noam, to meet him. Noam asked Shlomo if he would be the cantor when Noam became bar mitzvah – one month hence. Shlomo happily agreed. At that moment, it occurred to me: in my 34 years of knowing Shlomo, I had never asked him how he came to do his work.

“Here is the answer, perhaps the last interview Shlomo ever gave.

“After World War II, Shlomo’s father brought him to a DP camp. Someone had built an improvised sukkah for people from the DP camps who had survived the concentration camps. It was a very exciting week of Sukkot. During that holiday, a man stood outside, screaming at the sukkah, even throwing rocks, very upset about what was going on.

“At the end of Sukkot, Shlomo approached the distressed man and asked: Why didn’t you come in? He said that he stood outside the sukkah because no one asked him to come in.

“Shlomo said that he understood, that he had learned a lesson that he would carry with him for his entire life. The lesson was: do not be like Job, who was known for his hospitality but who waited for people to come to him. Instead, be like Abraham – sit outside of the tent and invite people in. And that is how Shlomo learned his first outreach lesson. Unless you invite people to come in, they will stay away. That distressed man in the DP camp helped Shlomo start his career, which became a legacy.

“Shlomo would not make it to Noam’s bar mitzvah. I once asked my son what he remembered from that encounter. The answer: ‘He kissed me on my forehead. I never forgot that.’”

Carlebach’s birthday marked

■ LAST WEEKEND, the 100th anniversary of Carlebach’s birth was marked in synagogues around the globeIn Jerusalem, guest cantor Ari Greene led the services on Friday night and Saturday morning at Hazvi Yisrael Synagogue in Talbiyeh, and poured his soul into singing Carlebach melodies.

Jimmy Carter’s mixed legacy

With the recent passing of former president Jimmy Carter, the time has come to consider the mixed legacy he has left behind. Although remembered for pursuing and signing the Camp David Accords, which facilitated the first peace treaty between Israel and an Arab state, this merely scratches the surface of his Mideast legacy.

Upon closer reflection, Carter’s actions after his presidency caused substantial harm to Israel and fostered a hostile narrative about the Israeli-Palestinian war whose pernicious effects continue to be felt.

Settlements and the push for a Palestinian state

Carter’s presidency was marked by intense conflict with Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin over Israel’s settlement activities in Judea, Samaria, and the Gaza Strip.

Carter’s adamant demand to reserve these territories for a Palestinian state clashed with Israel’s strategic interests, causing a rift that influences US-Israeli relations to this day, Carter championed a narrative that positioned Israel as an aggressor.

Carter’s relentless push for a Palestinian state was a cornerstone of his foreign policy, especially after he left the presidency.

Post-presidential advocacy and criticism

Carter’s criticism of Israel grew sharper after his presidency. He repeatedly blamed Israel for the ongoing war, ignoring the complexities and the intransigence of Palestinian leaders. Carter’s belief that he could single-handedly mediate peace reflected a fundamental misunderstanding of the region’s realities.

Wngaging with terrorists and spreading misinformation

Carter’s interactions with Hamas leaders, such as Khaled Meshaal and Ismail Haniyeh (killed this past year by the IDF following the Hamas massacre of October 7, 2023), represented some of the most disturbing aspects of Carter’s post-presidential efforts.

By portraying Hamas as a legitimate peace partner, Carter lent undeserved legitimacy to a terror organization committed to Israel’s decimation.

Carter’s consistent baseless claim that Hamas was interested in peace undermined international efforts to isolate the group.

Carter’s ultimate naivete was on full display in his role as the US observer and facilitator of the January 1996 elections that established Yasser Arafat as the “democratically elected” leader of the Palestinian Arab people. Although Carter liked to take credit for the “democratic” nature of the PA elections in numerous articles and speeches, this couldn’t have been further from the truth.

Covering the PA elections which Carter oversaw in 1996, I asked him about the allegation that Arafat had blown up the home of
his electoral opponent.

Carter only responded with a chuckle and said, “We have problems like that in Chicago, too.”

The most unkindly cut of all occurred during the 2014 war between Israel and Hamas, when he was called to remove Hamas from the US list of terrorist organizations.

His disproportionate criticism of Israel, coupled with a lack of condemnation for Hamas’s terrorist activities, highlighted his bias and alienated him from the mainstream Jewish community.

Apartheid label

Carter’s 2006 book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, equated Israeli policies with apartheid, a grossly inaccurate and damaging comparison.

The book’s portrayal of Israel as the ultimate obstacle to peace ignored the consistent rejection by Palestinian leaders of any peace offers. Carter’s refusal to acknowledge these rejections transformed the former president into a purveyor of harmful misinformation that continues to haunt Israel’s international standing.

Antisemitic stereotypes

-Carter’s rhetoric often veered into antisemitism, as seen in his comments about Jewish
influence over US politics and media. These statements, which echoed dangerous stereotypes, drew widespread condemnation.

By framing Jewish criticism of his book as an orchestrated attack, Jimmy Carter’s legacy is one of significant harm and is detrimental to Israel’s security and its relationship with the United States.

By legitimizing terrorist groups and perpetuating a damaging narrative, Carter will be remembered as the first critic of Israel to pin the indelible apartheid label on the Jewish state, distracting Middle East observers from Carter’s accomplishment as the facilitator of the 1979 Camp David Peace Accord.

Trump Should Pull Out of Gaza Nation Building

The disastrous ceasefire deal proposed by the Biden administration and rubber stamped by Steve Witkoff, Trump’s Middle East envoy, doesn’t just free thousands of Islamic terrorists while letting Hamas reclaim power, it also commits America to a 5-year rebuilding of Gaza.

If the Trump administration backs the deal, it will be forced to act as a ‘guarantor’ which will not only mean protecting Hamas, but an extended terrorist nation-building program bigger even than Iraq or Afghanistan. Phase 3 of the deal reportedly calls for a 3-5 year rebuilding program.

That timetable would have President Trump spend his whole second term rebuilding Gaza.

And the UN’s actual numbers are far worse. The UN Development Program is estimating $50 billion in costs to rebuild Gaza by 2040. Since the UN is not known for bringing in projects on time, it’s entirely possible that nation-building Gaza would cost even more and last indefinitely.

This would not have been the deal that a Trump administration national security team would have signed on to, but unfortunately President-elect Trump’s envoy Witkoff (pictured above) went along with the Biden deal. Witkoff worked with Secretary of State Tony Blinken and Middle East adviser Brett McGurk to make the United States a ‘guarantor’ of a bad plan that includes an “interim force” to police Gaza, extended “reconstruction” and a “technocratic” unity government acting as a front for the Hamas and the PLO terrorists as part of a unity deal formed in Beijing under China.

This is nation-building. And it may be the single worst example of it. Even worse than Iraq.

There was some remote possibility that Afghanistan and Iraq could work out, there is zero chance of nation-building in Gaza and the West Bank leading to anything except terrorism, billions of dollars in foreign aid, more dead Americans and another war in the region.

Nation-building and endless war are the opposite of the foreign policy that Trump ran on.

The good news is that the Trump administration can pull out of this terrible Biden deal. And if he pulls out before Phase 3, America won’t be stuck doing more terrorist nation-building in Gaza.

“We’ve made it very clear to the Israelis, and I want the people of Israel to hear me on this—if they need to go back in, we’re with them. If Hamas doesn’t live up to the terms of this agreement, we are with them,” Trump’s National Security Advisor Mike Waltz vowed.

Since Hamas and the PLO have made it clear that the terrorist attacks will continue until Israel is destroyed, the Trump administration has a very simple exit strategy from Phase 3.

All it has to do is, as National Security Adviser Walz said, let Israel go back to fighting once the hostages are free and the terrorists break the ceasefire. And that will abort the reconstruction.

If the Trump administration recognizes that the terrorists broke the ceasefire, then it’s over.

However, if the Trump administration pressures Israel to accept ceasefire violations by Islamic terrorists in Gaza without fighting back, as it is reportedly doing with Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon, not only Israel, but America will be stuck with endless nation-building in Gaza.

And that will be a disaster.

The Biden ceasefire deal isn’t just a trap for Israel, it traps the Trump administration into the same old failed nation-building programs in the Middle East that have failed under Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden. In his first term, President Trump broke from 30 years of failed policies and oversaw the rise of a new pro-American alliance by dropping ‘Palestinian’ nation-building.

That legacy is now threatened by the Biden ceasefire deal which puts America back in the business of nation-building a terrorist state in Gaza and the West Bank, which drags us into a UN process in which billions of dollars will fall into the hands of terrorists and the alliances that his first term worked so hard to build up will be torn apart by disputes over the ‘Palestinians’.

Every time an administration gets into the business of ‘Palestinian’ nation-building, it comes away with nothing. That’s because the entire ‘Palestinian’ cause was invented by the USSR to undermine America and Israel, to spread terrorism, and to cause new wars. Trying to build a ‘Palestinian’ nation is even more doomed than trying to nation-build in Afghanistan.

Gaza is an even worse version of Afghanistan. And Phase 3 of the Biden ceasefire deal puts us right back to nation-building in another Islamic terrorist war zone.

That’s why it’s urgent that Phase 3 should not be allowed to happen.

Phase 3 is Afghanistan and Iraq all over again. Phase 3 is a trap for President TrumpGetting out of Phase 3 will determine if the Trump administration foreign policy succeeds.

The Trump administration should exit the Biden ceasefire deal as soon as possible. The sooner it gets out, the less likely Phase 3 will be to trap us into nation-building in Gaza. And the less likely it is we will have to send soldiers to join an “interim force” to police Gaza or send billions of dollars to ‘rebuild’ Gaza so that Hamas can start another war so we can rebuild it yet again.

This is not what Trump ran on. It’s not what Americans voted for. It’s not what they want.

People should not assume that it’s a done deal once it has been initiated. While the early phases are the most dangerous for Israelis because they lead to the mass release of Islamic terrorists and the Hamas takeover of Gaza, Phase 3 is the most dangerous for America.

The Trump administration needs to be out of the deal long before Phase 3. And the longer we stay in, the more commitments our negotiators will make and the harder it will be to get out.

Americans should not be complacent about assuming that the administration will pull the plug before Phase 3. Much will depend on whom President Trump is hearing from about the deal. Even once the deal is underway, it’s urgent to keep speaking out against nation-building in Gaza. Not one dollar or American life should be sacrificed for nation-building in Gaza.

America needs to rebuild itself, not Gaza. It needs to police its own streets, not Gaza streets. In his first year in office, President Trump vowed, we are “not nation-building again; we are killing terrorists.” America needs to stop nation-building in Gaza and start letting Israel kill terrorists.

BREAKING: Trump to Halt Funding to UNRWA

Former President Donald Trump is poised to take immediate action on one of his key foreign policy priorities upon assuming office for a second term: halting U.S. financial assistance to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). The anticipated executive order, which is expected to be signed within Trump’s first week back in office, aims to cut U.S. funding to the agency, marking a decisive shift in the U.S. approach to foreign aid and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

UNRWA, a UN agency tasked with providing aid to Palestinian refugees, has long been embroiled in controversy due to repeated allegations of links to Hamas, the Gaza-based terrorist group. In fact, the UN recently acknowledged that nine of its staff members may have been involved in the October 7 terrorist attack on Israel, further intensifying criticism of the agency.

A White House policy adviser for the incoming Trump administration highlighted the rationale behind this move, stating, “The United States and American citizens have been some of the most generous people in the entire world. But at this point, we have to understand that foreign policy is domestic policy, and if this is not aligned with our interests, then Uncle Sam should not be opening up his pocketbook any longer.”

 

The decision to halt funding to UNRWA is just one of several significant actions expected to be taken in Trump’s first week back in office. In addition to this executive order, other anticipated directives include:

  • Removing insubordinate government employees.
  • Reversing the Biden administration’s green energy initiatives.
  • Taking action to ensure the continued operation of TikTok.
  • Declaring a state of emergency at the U.S.-Mexico border.
  • Ending the controversial “catch and release” immigration policy.
  • Designating Mexican drug cartels as “foreign terrorist organizations.”

With these planned moves, Trump’s administration is signaling an aggressive approach to fulfilling campaign promises and shifting U.S. foreign and domestic policies in a direction aligned with his administration’s priorities. The halt of funding to UNRWA is expected to be a pivotal part of this broader agenda.

JBN contributed to this article.

Imminent UNRWA Ban is ‘First Domino’ in Fighting ‘Palestinian Terror’, Says Key Knesset Lawmaker

With an Israeli ban on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency due to begin in two weeks, a key Knesset lawmaker on Sunday called the blacklist, “the first domino in the collapse of Palestinian terrorism.”

A summary of a confidential discussion of legislation by the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee quoted committee chairman Yuli Edelstein saying, “Removing UNRWA from the equation will finally provide an opportunity to stop the perpetuation of terrorism and begin a de-radicalization process in UNRWA’s centers of activity. This is the first domino in the collapse of Palestinian terrorism and a bright spot of hope for a better future.”

In October, the Knesset passed legislation taking effect later in January stripping UNRWA of its diplomatic immunity, barring Israeli officials from cooperating with the agency, and prohibiting it from operating in Israeli sovereign territory. Israel withdrew its diplomatic recognition of UNRWA one month later. Without work permits for foreign staff or coordination of passage at checkpoints, the agency will not be able to function. Even in Gaza, UNWA coordinates heavily with the Israeli army.

In early January, UN Watch, a Geneva-based watchdog organization, accused UNRWA of having an “unholy alliance” with Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Its 55-page report accused Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA’s Commissioner-General, and his colleagues of enabling infiltration by Hamas and other terror groups.

According to the report, over 10% of UNRWA’s senior educators in Gaza are members of Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Israeli authorities have also alleged that hundreds of UNRWA’s 13,000 Gazan employees, including teachers, are active members of Hamas. It also found that the terror groups influenced UNRWA policies, indoctrinated Arab children through agency schools, and established military infrastructure near UNRWA’s Gaza facilities.

More than 100 survivors of Hamas’s October 7 attacks filed a $1 billion lawsuit against UNRWA in June, accusing the agency of “aiding and abetting” the terror group. According to the suit, the lead plaintiff, 84-year-old Ditza Heiman of Kibbutz Nir Oz, was held captive for seven weeks in the home of a Gazan man who said he was a UNRWA teacher at a boy’s school. The suit also alleges that UNRWA enacted an employee payment scheme to benefit Hamas in violation of UN protocols.

Israel’s largest bank froze UNRWA’s account in February over suspicious financial transfers that the agency failed to adequately explain. That same month, Israeli forces discovered a Hamas complex located directly under the UNRWA’s Gaza City headquarters and connected directly to the agency’s electricity system. The facility included numerous computer servers belonging to the terror group.

In May, UNRWA was ordered to vacate its Jerusalem offices in May over lease violations.

“Palestinian” refugees are the only refugee population with its own dedicated UN agency. The rest of the world’s refugees fall under the mandate of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

At least 1,200 people were killed, and 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken hostage in Hamas’s attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Of the 94 remaining hostages, more than 30 have been declared dead.

It Wasn’t a Deal – It Was a Crime

ככר החטופים

The decision by the Israeli government to make significant concessions to the Hamas kidnappers should never be called a “deal.” It was an extortion. Would you call it a deal if somebody kidnapped your child and you “agreed” to pay ransom to get her back? Of course not. The kidnapping was a crime. And the extortionate demand was an additional crime.

So the proper description of what occurred is that Israel, pressured by the United States, capitulated to the unlawful and extortionate demands of Hamas as the only way of saving the lives of kidnapped babies, mothers and other innocent, mostly civilian, hostages.

This was not the result of a negotiation between equals. If an armed robber puts a gun to your head and says, “your money or your life,” your decision to give him your money would not be described as a deal. Nor should the extorted arrangement agreed to by Israel be considered a deal. So let’s stop using that term.

When a terrorist group “negotiates” with a democracy, it always has the upper hand. The terrorists are not constrained by morality, law or truth. They can murder at will, rape at will, torture at will and threaten to do worse. The democracy, on the other hand, must comply with the rules of law and must listen to the pleas of the hostage families. The result of this exertion was bad for Israel’s security, but good for the hostages who remain alive and their families. The heart rules the brain, as it often does in moral democracies that value the immediate saving of the lives of known people over the future deaths of hypothetical people whose identities we do not know. This tradeoff is understandable as compassionate, even if not compelling as policy.

If every democratic nation adopted a policy of never negotiating with terrorists, it might discourage terrorism. But every nation submits to the demands of kidnappers and extortionists, so terrorism and hostage-taking have become a primary tactic of the worst people in the world. And the rest of us are complicit.

Especially complicit, with blood on their hands, are supporters of Hamas on university campuses who chant for intifada and revolution. Also complicit are international organizations, such as the International Criminal Court, that treat Israel and Hamas as equals. These supporters of terrorism encouraged Hamas to hold out for many months in the belief that their support would pressure Israel into making more concessions.

The students of terror – the university students who are encouraging Hamas into continuing their murderous ways – must be held accountable for their complicity in evil. Though they may have the same First Amendment rights as Jews do, they should be treated with the same contempt that Nazis, the KKK and racist supporters of violence are treated. The First Amendment does not give them the right to be hired by decent employers.

The First Amendment gives employers the power to refuse to associate with supporters of Nazism, Hamas terrorism or other evil groups. American law criminalizes giving material support to designated terrorist groups, which include Hamas and Hezbollah. Morality, as distinguished from law, should deem immoral providing any support — material, political, economic or demonstrative – to any terrorist group such as Hamas. Yet both the presidential and vice-presidential candidates of the Democrat Party urged people to listen to the messages of these protestors. They would never say that about demonstrators who favored lynching blacks or raping women. But Hamas does lynch Jews and rape Jewish women. There is no moral difference.

Let us welcome the news that perhaps 33 of the 98 hostages may be released, some of them alive, with the realization that what Hamas extorted from Israel in return for these releases may well endanger Israel’s security in the future and cost still more innocent lives.

And let us put the blame for ALL the deaths in Gaza where it belongs: on Hamas and the useful idiots and useless bigots who support murderous terrorists.

{Reposted from Gatestone Institute}