The Israeli City of Haifa in Palestinian Authority Textbooks Taught in UNRWA Schools

The PA textbooks taught in UNRWA schools (grades 1-10) in Judea, Samaria, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip present the city of Haifa, which is located within Israel’s pre-1967 territories, as a Palestinian city:

A lesson titled “Cities of Palestine” mentions the cities of Jerusalem, Gaza, Khan Yunis, Hebron, Ramallah, Nablus, Tulkarm, Jenin, and also Jaffa and Haifa (National Education, Grade 2, Part 1 (2015) p. 22).

Another book features a text in which a teacher asks the students to do research on Palestinian cities, and one of the students says that she will ask her grandmother to tell her about the city of Haifa. In that same book a question reads: “We will mention the names of the Palestinian cities that appeared in the text [Gaza, Hebron, Jericho – and Haifa]” (Our Beautiful Language, Grade 2, Part 1 (2016) pp. 114, 115, respectively; (2020) pp. 118, 119). Haifa also appears among the Palestinian cities in another assignment (Mathematics, Grade 2, Part 1 (2016) p. 91)

Both Gaza and Haifa are said to be port cities in Palestine (Geography of the Arab Homeland, Grade 9 (2015) p. 82, and see the assignment on p. 83: “An outline map of the Arab homeland will be distributed to the students upon which I will write the names of the Arab States and mark the ports of Haifa, Aden, Basra, Alexandria and Damam.”)

A lesson titled “Palestinian Cities” discusses in some detail, under the title “the Most Important Palestinian Cities”, a number of cities located in pre-1967 Israel: Haifa, Jaffa, Nazareth, Safed and Beer Sheba. In no place does this piece mention that these cities are now found inside Israeli territory (Geography of Palestine, Grade 7 (2014) pp. 81-85). On the contrary, an assignment on p. 86 specifies: “I will draw a map of Palestine and put on it the most important cities.” 

In the following assignment the student is required to put the name of a city – the Israeli city of Haifa in this case – in a sentence:                                                           “3. The city of …[Haifa]… is one of the Palestinian coastal cities.”                          (National and Life Education, Grade 2, Part 1 (2017) p. 81)

Caesarea, Haifa and Acre are mentioned among Palestine’s touristic sites (National Education, Grade 2, Part 2 (2015) p. 61)

The Palestinian city of Haifa was occupied in 1948, its Arab residents have left it and yearn to come back:

“-When was the city of Haifa occupied?                                                                          -Mention some Palestinian cities that were occupied in 1948.”                        (Teacher’s Guide, Arabic Language – Academic Path, Grade 10 (2018) p. 64) 

And in response to a question about Palestinian cities that were “occupied by the enemy” in that same year:                                                                                             “3. Haifa, Jaffa, Ashkelon, Acre.”                                                                     (Teacher’s Guide, Arabic Language, Grade 8 (2018) p. 212)

“We left Haifa with the intention to return and God is the [only] one who knows what will become of us.”                                                                                             (Reading and Texts, Grade 10, Part 1 (2015) p. 39)

“The teacher will tell a short story about our homeland Palestine: ‘My grandfather used to live in a nice village in [the vicinity of] Haifa. He worked in agriculture, loved the land and guarded it. On one sad day foreign faces came in order to drive my grandfather out of his land, burn the crop and force him to emigrate to distant lands’.” (Teacher’s Guide, Our Beautiful Language, Grade 2, Part 2 [2016] p. 53; Our Beautiful Language, Grade 2 (2018) p. 124)

A story titled “A homeland that resides within us”:                                              “Yasser and his sister Abir agreed to participate in a journalistic writing contest by writing an essay about Palestine.                                                                              Abir: ‘What will we write in the essay?’                                                                 Yasser: ‘We will write about the homeland that resides within us [while] we do not reside there.’                                                                                                              Abir: ‘And how would we write about a homeland that we cannot reach?’          Yasser: ‘We will ask grandfather and grandmother and the [other] elder people about Acre, Haifa, Jaffa, Safed and other places.’                                                              Abir: ‘And we will not forget to express our dream and right to return to our homeland and live there’.”                                                                                                          (Our Beautiful Language, Grade 2, Part 2 (2016) p. 6; (2020) p. 8) 

One of the sentences within an exercise following that story:                           “Yasser’s grandfather was living in the city of Haifa.”                                              (Our Beautiful Language, Grade 2, Part 2 (2016) p. 8; (2020) p. 9)

The Palestinian city of Haifa must be liberated:

“B. Haifa is awaiting its liberation.”                                                                      (Teacher’s Guide, Our Beautiful Language, Grade 4 (2018) p. 204)

The supposed liberators are the youths of the Palestinian Al-Fatah organization, as said in the following hymn of the organization’s youth movement:                                      “I am a lion cub; I am a flower;   we gave [our] soul to the revolution                  Our forefathers built for us houses in our free country [in the future]                                      I am a lion cub; I am a flower; we carried the revolution’s ember                               To Haifa, to Jaffa, to Al-Aqsa [Mosque], to the [Dome of the] Rock”

(Our Beautiful Language, Grade 2, Part 1 (2016) p. 42; (2020) p. 44)

The notion of the return of the refugees’ descendants to Haifa while it is still under Israeli rule is presented as sheer lunacy, which makes us understand that it should take place after the elimination of Israel:

In a story appearing in a tenth grade Arabic Language textbook, the hero is arrested and sent back from Haifa to the West Bank by the Israeli police following his attempt to visit his father’s house in the city years after the latter’s departure in 1948. The ending sentence in the story, in which the hero agrees with the policemen who call him ‘crazy’, is the subject of the following question and answer in the corresponding teacher’s guide:                                                                                                             “6. Why did the writer describe himself as crazy at the end of the story?                       -Because the one, who is expelled from his homeland and is later content to return to it as a guest with the robbers who had seized it, is really crazy.”                      (Teacher’s Guide, Arabic Language – Academic Path, Grade 10 (2018) p. 199)

העיר חיפה בספרי הלימוד של הרשות הפלסטינית הנלמדים בבתיה”ס של אונר”א

בספרי הלימוד של הרש”פ הנלמדים בבתיה”ס של אונר”א (כיתות א’-י’) ביהודה, שומרון, מזרח ירושלים ורצועת עזה מופיעה העיר חיפה שבתחומי מדינת ישראל כעיר פלסטינית: 

בשיעור “ערי פלסטין” מוזכרות הערים ירושלים, עזה, ח’אן יונס, חברון, ראמאללה, שכם, טולכרם, ג’נין, וגם יפו וחיפה (חינוך לאומי, כתה ב’, חלק א’ (2015) עמ’ 22).

בספר אחר מטילה המורה על תלמידות לחקור על ערים פלסטיניות ואחת מהן אומרת כי תשאל את סבתה על חיפה. באותו ספר מופיעה שאלה: “נציין את שמות הערים הפלסטיניות שהופיעו בטקסט [עזה, חברון, יריחו, חיפה]” (שפתנו היפה, כתה ב’, חלק א’ (2016) ע”ע 114, 115, בהתאמה). חיפה מופיעה גם בין הערים הפלסטיניות במטלת מדידת הטמפרטורה בהן ביום ובלילה (מתמטיקה, כתה ב’, חלק א’ (2016) עמ’ 91).

חיפה ועזה הן ערי נמל בפלסטין (גיאוגרפיה של המולדת הערבית, כתה ט’ (2015) עמ’ 82 וכן מטלה בעמ’ 83: “מפה מדינית אילמת של המולדת הערבית תחולק לתלמידים ועליה אקבע את שמות המדינות הערביות ואת הנמלים חיפה, עדן, אלבצרה, אלכסנדריה, אלדמאם.”

תרגיל להשלמה ע”י התלמיד לפי חומר הלימוד בספר:                                                                 “3. העיר …[חיפה]… היא אחת מערי החוף הפלסטיניות.”                                                        (חינוך לאומי ולחיים, כתה ב’, חלק א’ (2017) עמ’ 81)

בין אתרי התיירות של פלסטין מוזכרות קיסריה חיפה ועכו (חינוך לאומי, כתה ב’, חלק ב’ (2015) עמ’ 61).

העיר הפלסטינית חיפה נכבשה בשנת 1948, תושביה הערבים עזבוה ומתגעגעים לשוב אליה:

“-מתי נכבשה העיר חיפה?                                                                                                        -ציין כמה ערים פלסטיניות שנכבשו ב-1948.”                                                                      (השפה הערבית – המסלול האקדמי, כתה י’ (2018) עמ’ 64)

ובתשובה לשאלה על ערים פלסטיניות אחרות שנכבשו ע”י האויב באותה שנה:                                  “3. חיפה, יפו, אשקלון, עכו.”                                                                                              (השפה הערבית, כתה ח’ (2018) עמ’ 212)

“עזבנו את חיפה בכוונה לשוב ואלוהים הוא היודע מה יהיה איתנו.”                                             (קריאה וטקסטים, כתה י’, חלק א’ (2015) עמ’ 39)

“המורה יספר [לתלמידים] סיפור קצר על מולדתנו פלסטין: ‘סבי היה גר בכפר יפה ב[סביבת] חיפה. הוא עבד בחקלאות, אהב את האדמה ושמר עליה. ביום עצוב אחד באו פנים זרות כדי לגרש את סבי מעל אדמתו, לשרוף את היבול ולאלצו להגר לארצות רחוקות”.                                                                                             (מדריך למורה, שפתנו היפה, כתה ב’, חלק ב’ [2016] עמ’ 53; שפתנו היפה, כתה ב’ (2018) עמ’ 124)

סיפור בכותרת “מולדת השוכנת בתוכנו”:                                                                             “יאסר ואחותו עביר הסכימו ביניהם להשתתף בתחרות [כתיבה] עיתונאית לכתיבת מאמר על פלסטין. עביר: מה נכתוב במאמר?                                                                                                  יאסר: נכתוב על המולדת השוכנת בתוכנו ואשר אנו איננו שוכנים בתוכה.                                   עביר: ואיך נכתוב על מולדת שאיננו יכולים להגיע אליה?                                                         יאסר: נשאל את סבא ואת סבתא ואת המבוגרים אודות עכו, חיפה, יפו, צפת ומקומות אחרים.           עביר: ולא נשכח להביע את חלומנו וזכותנו לשוב אל מולדתנו ולחיות בה.”                                (שפתנו היפה, כתה ב’, חלק ב’ (2016) עמ’ 6)

בין משפטי התרגול בעקבות הקטע:                                                                                       “סבו של יאסר היה חי בעיר חיפה.”                                                                                     (שפתנו היפה, כתה ב’, חלק ב’ (2016) עמ’ 8)

את העיר הפלסטינית חיפה יש לשחרר:

“ב. חיפה מחכה לשחרורה.”                                                                                                          (מדריך למורה, שפתנו היפה, כתה ד’ (2018) עמ’ 204)

מי שיבצע את השחרור הם צעירי הפת”ח. להלן שיר של תנועת הנוער של הארגון:                          “אני גור אריות, אני פרח, נתנו את הנפש למהפכה                                                               סבינו בנו בתים לנו בארצנו החופשית [בעתיד]                                                                         אני גור אריות, אני פרח, נשאנו את גחלת המהפכה                                                                     אל חיפה, אל יפו, אל [מסגד] אל-אקצא, אל [כיפת] הסלע” 

(שפתנו היפה, כתה ב’, חלק א’ (2016) עמ’ 42)

רעיון השיבה לחיפה תחת השלטון הישראלי מוצג כשיגעון, ומכאן אפשר להבין ששיבת הערבים לחיפה תתבצע רק לאחר סילוק ישראל: 

בסיפור המופיע בספר לימוד השפה הערבית של כתה י’ נעצר הגיבור ונשלח חזרה מחיפה לגדה המערבית ע”י המשטרה הישראלית לאחר ניסיונו לבקר בבית אביו בעיר, שנים לאחר עזיבתו של זה ב-1948. השוטרים מכנים אותו משוגע והגיבור מסיים את הסיפור בהסכמה לתואר זה. המשפט המסיים בסיפור הוא הנושא של השאלה והתשובה שלהלן במדריך למורה לאותה כתה:

“-מדוע תיאר הכותב את עצמו כמשוגע בסוף הסיפור?                                                                               -כי מי שמגורש ממולדתו ואח”כ שבע רצון מהשיבה אליה כאורח אצל השודדים שהשתלטו עליה הוא אכן משוגע.” (מדריך למורה, השפה הערבית -המסלול האקדמי, כתה י’ (2018) עמ’ 199)

Explain how a US adminstration that officially seeks peace by means of a two state solution (one Jewish, one Arab) keeps dumping money into the primary organization (UNRWA)

Explain how a US adminstration that officially seeks peace by means of a two state solution (one Jewish, one Arab) keeps dumping money into the primary organization (UNRWA)

‘Cruel German behavior’: Families of Munich massacre victims call to boycott memorial ceremony

The families of the 1972 Munich Olympic Massacre victims said they plan to boycott a memorial ceremony marking the 50th anniversary of the attack in protest over the German government’s “degrading” offer of compensation.

The ceremony is scheduled to take place in Munich in September, with President Isaac Herzog slated to attend.

“We expect President Herzog to also announce, immediately, that he is not coming,” Ankie Spitzer, whose husband Andrei was one of the 11 murdered Israelis, told The New York Times.

“If the families don’t travel, he shouldn’t travel either because if he is there, even to lay a wreath, it will legitimize this cruel German behavior,” she added.

According to The New York Times, Berlin has paid out $4.8 million in compensation and has offered a further $5.58 million to 23 remaining family members, but the families are seeking 20 times that sum.

Ilana Romano, widow of Israeli weightlifter Yossef Romano, said Germany “threw us to the dogs. They mistreated us for 50 years.”

“The offer is degrading, and we are standing by our stance that we are boycotting the (anniversary) ceremony,” she told German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. She added that the compensation would be rejected.

Palestinian terrorists from the Black September terror group broke into the Olympic Village where the Israeli athletes were staying, killing two and taking others hostage. They demanded the release of 234 Palestinians in Israeli prisons as well as members of the German leftwing Baader Meinhoff terror group in German jails.

The hostages and a police officer were killed during a failed rescue attempt by West German police.

“They decided to take responsibility — very nice after 50 years,” Romano said, adding that she expected real compensation, not “pennies.”

“If the German government thinks it can wrap up this matter according to terms set for of a domestic terror attack, they are wrong,” she said. “They will pay in accordance to international standards in terror attacks. The Palestinian terrorists cannot be given more money than the victims.”

“Three of the terrorists survived, and were soon freed after a trumped up plane hijacking, and the pursuant negotiations, with $9 million,” she said.

The Protestant Cutting Edge Of Demonization Of Israel And The Jewish People

Presbyterians and Episcopalians recently held their church-wide conventions, the kind that are convened only every few years to decide major policy issues. Both voted on resolutions highly critical of Israel. The Presbyterians – at least the denomination known as Presbyterian Church (USA), or PCUSA – passed a number of them, including ones labeling Israel as an apartheid state. The Episcopalians did not go so far.

With Ukraine, inflation, gasoline prices, and lingering Covid, why worry about these resolutions? After all, over the last 15 years or so we’ve seen Israel-demonization in all the “mainline” liberal Protestant denominations grow just as rapidly as their numbers shrink. They mattered once; they no longer do.

Think again. This obscure drama playing out is a tale of the politicization of religion in America, a cog in a global effort to demonize Israel and her Zionist supporters. It does not bode well for the comfort level of Jews in America, a nation that has been the most hospitable country for Jews in two thousand years of the Diaspora.

Let’s start with PCUSA, which in the past mourned the Abraham Peace Accords, and whose current leader denounces Israeli “enslavement” of Palestinians. At its General Assembly, it passed multiple resolutions slandering Israel as an apartheid state for its alleged maltreatment of Arabs – not just in Judea and Samaria but throughout Israel proper. The timing of this screed is in lockstep with an open-ended, UN-funded investigation of Israel, one whose chief officials explicitly declared the same charge, essentially lobbying for an end to the Jewish state.

PCUSA added Nakba Remembrance Day to the Presbyterian religious calendar. It called for the end to the “siege of Gaza” with only the faintest reference to Hamas rocket attacks. It excoriated Israeli military defense of its citizens because of the toll suffered in Gaza. It accused Israel of working to change the religious balance of Jerusalem and the Holy Land by restricting access to Christian and Muslim worshippers. No mention of a new poll that 48 percent of East Jerusalemites would opt for Israeli, not Palestinian, citizenship.

The Episcopalians considered three resolutions that explicitly termed Israel an apartheid state, but none passed. (Not that they failed. They just kicked them down the road for consideration in two years.) They did pass one that effectively labeled Israel apartheid without using the word. They also passed measures opposing the anti-BDS legislation that has stymied the antisemitic campaign in many U.S. states. They considered a proposal “that our Church commits itself anew to avoid antisemitic rhetoric, not least in our discourse regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict” – but they chose not to act on it.

They denounced Christian Zionism, calling it “a modern misinterpretation of scripture having no connection to the Creeds or the Prayer Book,” and condemned “political policy positions promoted by such a theology.” In other words, political support for the Jewish State, such as offered by the more conservative Christian denominations.

They stoked the flames of Christian antisemitism, by expressing “alarm at the escalating threat to the Christian presence in the Holy City of Jerusalem and the Holy Land from Israeli radical groups who are actively seeking to undermine the Christian communities of the Holy Land.” Interestingly, Episcopalians did commit themselves “anew to avoid antisemitic rhetoric, not least in our discourse regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

The Rev. Todd Stavrkos, who heads a group of staunch allies of Israel within PCUSA, bemoans what has happened to his church: “The American Jewish community, in our hometowns, will label us as antisemitic, because we are,” adding,

Over the last twenty years, we have witnessed our once proud denomination of three million…become a denomination hovering around one million, where presbyteries have to search for people willing to serve as commissioners, a GA watched by fewer than 400 people at any time, and its actions controlled by a small group of committee members and staff in Louisville.

The action taken by the GA to slander Israel with apartheid fits into this narrative. A highly controlled process… became a means to silence outside groups and stifle dissent. Nary a Jewish voice was heard at the GA, experts offering countering opinions were not allowed to speak, only a select few of the Louisville staff had standing… No overture opponents were allowed to speak.

In other words, PCUSA has gone the way of too many institutions in America, in which a small group of vocal, politically driven extremists rail against the “untenable status quo,” and then cancel their opponents. It is not just campuses and mainstream media that have fallen to cancel culture. Organized religion is among the key targets to mainstream and normalize the unthinkable.

American Jews and all lovers of Zion are targeted on campuses, on social media, and on the streets of major cities. Open hostility to Jews as Jews – such as was heard at the committee meetings that preceded the PCUSA General Assembly votes and in the U.S. Congress – is now socially accepted. Detailed maps of Jews, Jewish schools, and even pro-Israel churches posted by extremists are flaunted online.

History proves time and again that words have consequences. If history is prologue, then PCUSA’s hateful resolutions will have a lasting impact long after that church fades into oblivion.

American Jews – whatever our orientation – must get our act together and unite against history’s oldest hate or be swallowed up by the ever-morphing cancer we call antisemitism.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer 1945 – Stupid people are more dangerous than evil ones

Bonhoeffer on Stupidity (entire quote)

Dietrich Bonhoeffer argued that stupid people are more dangerous than evil ones. This is because while we can protest against or fight evil people, against stupid ones we are defenseless — reasons fall on dead ears. Bonhoeffer’s famous text, slightly edited for this video, acts as a warning of what can happen when certain people gain too much power.

Germany enters the digital age of genocide education

 
The UNRWA Palestinian Authortiy school curriculum represents  the first school system which endorses and promotes the murder of Jews. 
 
Now digitized by Germany,  major funder of UNRWA/PA education. 
 

Why ignore UNRWA in Gaza war reporting?

Coverage of the current Gaza war ignores a prime cause of violence: UNRWA, hosting  31% of  Gaza residents, confined to  “temporary” refugee camps, against their will, under the premise and promise of the only goal held out by UNRWA; The right of return to Arab villages that existed before 1948.

593,163 Gazans dwell in the eight UNRWA Gaza refugee camps, out of a total of 1.9 million Gaza residents  (31 percent of Gaza): Beach refugee camp,  (85,628); Bureij (more than 43,330); Deir al-Balah (more than 25,569); Jabalia (nearly 113,990): Khan Younis (87,816); Al-Maghazi (31,329); Nuseirat (more than 80,194) and Rafah (125,304)

stats gathered by “Camera”

Dispatched a crew this summer to cover the armed UNRWA summer camps which indoctrinate the next generation for war. New movie on UNRWA now in production.

Prime funders of UNRWA summer “education” are Saudi Arabia, Germany, Turkey and Qatar.

These are the articles that should follow :

https://twitter.com/EinatWilf/status/1548368229369724930

https://www.arabnews.com/node/2140411/middle-east

https://www.nationalreview.com//israel-is-the-bad-guy-in-the-eyes-of-the-media-once-again/

Behind the scene with David Bedein – August 10, 2022

Behind the scene with David Bedein – August 10, 2022

PROPOSED Investigation Into COGAT and Israel Corporate Sector Complicit Operations in the PA, especially in Gaza.

Israeli corporations have a de facto monopoly on the provision of supplies to Gaza
and other PA areas. The ability of these corporations to sustain their exclusive
control of this multi-billion dollar market is wholly dependent on COGAT
(Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories) decision making.
Over the past several weeks, COGAT has raised an alarm that humanitarian aid from
UNRWA is not reaching the Palestinian population. Noting that this alarm is
inconsistent with 1000 trucks a day carrying Israeli products into Gaza, the Center for
Near East Policy Research (CFNEPR) contacted 44 donor nations. With the exception
of a nominal reduction in U.S. aid, every donor notion responded emphatically that
UNRWA and hence Gaza, is receiving 100% of its customary donations, an amount
that CFNEPR calculates to be $1.2 billion dollars per year.

This on-going funding includes $13.5 million transferred on behalf of the Bank of
Israel each month in cash by COGAT officials at the Erez border crossing that is put
into the hands of the UNRWA workers union which is under the control of Hamas.
Once the Israeli goods have been offloaded from the Israeli trucks, witnesses have
observed cash payments being made to COGAT officials.

Proposed investigation of Israeli Corporate Corruption