PLEASE HELP 5 CHILDREN ORPHANED IN THIS LAST WAR! can you put this missile is context? that doesn’t change the idea of helping

This exchange speaks for itself. A Jerusalem Post columnist, Gershon Baskin, ignores the context of Arab  civilian deaths in Gaza.

From: Dr. Aaron Lerner <imra@netvision.net.il>
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 9:48 AM
Subject: Fw: Fwd: PLEASE HELP 5 CHILDREN ORPHANED IN THIS LAST WAR! can you put this missile is context? that doesn’t change the idea of helping

From: Gershon Baskin <gershonbaskin@gmail.com>
Date: 9 August 2022 at 00:04:33 GMT+3
To: “Dr. Aaron Lerner” <imra@netvision.net.il>
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP 5 CHILDREN ORPHANED IN THIS LAST WAR! can you put this missile is context? that doesn’t change the idea of helping

I honestly don’t know the context, and it really doesn’t matter to me – the fact is that there are 5 children with no parents.  It is more than likely that it was an Israeli missile simply by the size of the explosion and the amount of damage.  They found the woman’s arm – that is all that was left of her.  Was she a Islamic Jihad terrorist – most definitely not.  Did she live in a building with terrorists – I don’t know.

 

From: “Dr. Aaron Lerner” <imra@netvision.net.il>
Date: Monday, 8 August 2022 at 23:46
To: Gershon Baskin <gershonbaskin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP 5 CHILDREN ORPHANED IN THIS LAST WAR! can you put this missile is context? that doesn’t change the idea of helping

Hi Gershon,

Can you put this Israeli missile in context?

That’s not to say that this family should not be helped.

Only that when a message goes out about civilians killed by an Israeli missile it is only proper to put it into context.

Option #1  The missile hit civilians an no one else.

Option #2. The civilians were in the same place as combatants and were killed along with combatants by the missile.

Option #2a. The civilians were in the same place as combatants and were killed along with combatants by the secondary explosion caused for explosives hit by missile.

or some other explanation.

To illustrate my point about context, lets take the example of a worker from Hebron who was wounded when the Israeli factory he works in was hit for a Palestinian rocket.

ONLY OPTION:  The civilian was hit by a rocket fired with no intention to specifically hit a military target.

 

Best regards,

Aaron

 

From: Gershon Baskin

Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 11:22 PM

To: GershonBaskinNewsandViews@googlegroups. com

Cc: Gershon-Baskin-English@Googlegroups. com

Subject: PLEASE HELP 5 CHILDREN ORPHANED IN THIS LAST WAR!

PLEASE HELP 5 CHILDREN ORPHANED IN THIS LAST WAR!

This is the house that Maram’s aunt was killed in two days ago in Gaza when an Israeli missile hit it. Maram is a young woman who I asked for your support to pay for her university tuition – she is studying computer science. Maram’s aunt left 5 children orphaned. Their father was killed in a bombing in 2014. The children: Sabrina Youssef 16 years old, Majd Youssef, 15 years old,Muhammad Youssef13 years old, Abdul Rahman Youssef 11 years old, and Aseel Youssef 9 years old have no parents.

I am asking you to help with some financial support. It will not replace their parents who can never be replaced. But we can offer some assistance to help get them through this horrible period.

A special fund was set up to accept your contributions.

Please help them!

 

https://social.fund/rwfowv/?sw=1

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
gershonbaskinnewsandviews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Gershon Baskin News & Views” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to GershonBaskinNewsandViews+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/GershonBaskinNewsandViews/3AEC9401-54A0-42B1-9B76-238881485D26%40gmail.com.

 

When Deterrence Becomes Just a Word

Deterrence — the act of deterring especially deterring a nuclear attack by the capacity or threat of retaliating.

Since Israel’s unilateral withdrawal in 2005, the Gaza Strip has turned into the leading military foe of the Jewish state. There have been at least a dozen mini- and full-fledged wars in which Israel, with one of the most powerful militaries in the world, was unable to defeat the Iranian-aligned Hamas and its allies. With each confrontation, the Iranian proxies have grown stronger and Israel weaker.

Last week, the Iranian-sponsored Islamic Jihad fired more than 1,000 missiles and rockets in a little more than two days, many of them reaching deep into Israel. The projectiles struck Israel’s biggest cities, including Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Beersheba, overcoming Israel’s air force and Iron Dome defense system. As in previous conflicts, Israel refrained from ground operations in the Gaza Strip, thus leaving its huge missile and rocket infrastructure intact.

“Iran orchestrated everything that happened inside and along the Gaza borders,” Yoni Ben Menachem, a leading Israeli analyst, said in a report for the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. “Ziad Al Nakhalah, the Islamic Jihad leader, visited Teheran’s leaders and ran the campaign in coordination with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.”

Israeli leaders, facing an election, pleaded for an Egyptian-arranged ceasefire and then declared victory. They claimed that the military had prevented Jihad strikes and even killed its entire leadership.

“In the future, if necessary, we will carry out preemptive strikes to protect the citizens of Israel, its sovereignty and infrastructure,” Defense Minister Benny Gantz said. “This holds true to every front, from Teheran to Khan Yunis,”

The mentor is China

If Iran has a mentor, it is China. Over the last 20 years, a patient Teheran has developed the military capabilities of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, defying Israeli threats to recapture the area. IRGC has expanded the range of Hamas and Jihad rockets and missiles from eight to at least 160 kilometers, sufficient to reach every major Israeli city. The Iranians have developed attack drones and balloons that could bomb Israeli communities. They have formed a network of tunnels that would allow the Palestinians to capture entire communities near the Gaza Strip.

“During its wars in Gaza, Hamas morphed from an irregular adversary to a hybrid one with qualities that only state actors possessed previously,” the Rand Corp. said in a report in 2017.

Israel’s guarantees

To prevent Israel from recapturing the Gaza Strip, Iran uses its allies in Europe and the United States to restrain the Jewish state. For its part, Israel has pledged to Washington and Cairo to preserve the Hamas regime and refrain from ground operations in Gaza, thus ensuring that Palestinian missile wars could last weeks or even months.

Iran has a strategic vision: using the Gaza Strip for a multi-front war against Israel. In the fog of war, Hamas and Jihad have tested weapons for firepower, range and accuracy. So far, the Palestinians have shown they could fire salvos of up to 100 projectiles and reach any strategic facility, particularly the nuclear complex in the southern city of Dimona.

The big day will come when Iran unleashes a much larger proxy — Hizbullah. Based in Lebanon and Syria, Hizbullah commands an arsenal of more than 200,000 missiles and rockets, greater than most conventional militaries. Drawing lessons from Hamas and Jihad, Hizbullah has been training to fire salvos of up to 1,000 missiles and rockets that could destroy major Israeli cities within minutes. It has developed an air defense network in coordination with Syria and bolstered by Russia, which deployed its advanced S-300 air and missile defense system near the Lebanese-Syrian border.

Israel’s victory claims aside, Hamas and Jihad casualties play no role in Iran’s strategy. Teheran regards the Palestinians as little more than cannon fodder, preserving Hizbullah for the big war. The Jihad commanders Israel killed in the latest round are easily replaceable because IRGC directly controls operations in the Gaza Strip.

Complacency

So, what has Iran achieved in the latest round? Teheran, preparing for the removal of Western sanctions, proved it determines stability in the region. IRGC, in what will have repercussions throughout the Middle East, tested its new command and control assets that maintain direct contact with the Gaza Strip.

Perhaps most important is that Israel has become complacent, its citizens resigned to missile strikes on their cities and dependent on the international community to restore temporary quiet. Therefore, an obedient Israel bolsters Hamas and increases shipments of goods, including concrete, steel and electronics, required by military forces in Gaza. The entry of 14,000 Gazan laborers in the Jewish state has become sacrosanct. In other words, Iran pays no price in its war with Israel

“Hamas emerged intact, and the benefits Israel gives it and its image as the leader in the Palestinian system were not eroded,” Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies said.

Pollak: 5 Consequences of Israel’s Stunning Win over Palestinian Islamic Jihad

The war began after Israel arrested a PIJ leader in the West Bank last week. PIJ then began mobilizing for terror attacks along the Gaza-Israel boundary, and Israel launched a preemptive strike, killing PIJ leader Taysir al-Jabari.

Starting Friday afternoon, PIJ then launched about 1,000 rockets, many of which were intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome missile shield. Some PIJ rockets actually killed Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

Meanwhile, Israel wiped out PIJ targets — including the whole leadership — with minimal impact on civilians.

The whole conflict ended Sunday evening with an Egyptian-brokered ceasefire, leaving many observers puzzled as to whether PIJ — and Iran — had made a massive blunder.

There are several consequences that are immediately clear:

1. Iran looks vulnerable. Iran’s proxy was easily routed, which raises questions about the military readiness of other proxies, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon. One of the reasons Iran has been able to deter a possible military strike on its nuclear facilities — either by Israel or the U.S. — is the fear that it could retaliate against Israel using rockets launched from Lebanon and Gaza. While Hamas — also supported by Iran — has been able to hurt Israel somewhat, PIJ’s utter failure damages Iran’s deterrence.

2. Palestinians failed to rouse international sympathy. When President Joe Biden took office, amid promises of opening a Palestinian consulate in Jerusalem, and restoring some funding to Palestinian organizations, it seemed Israel might suffer. But after Hamas launched a war against Israel last year, forcing Biden in a more pro-Israel direction, the Palestinians — and their left-wing allies in the U.S. — lost their opportunity. There was barely any international opposition to Israel this time around.

3. Israel is winning the media war. Sixteen years ago, during the Second Lebanon War, terror groups were able to trigger international outrage against Israel by hiding fighters and weapons among civilians, and manufacturing stories of atrocities. It fell to independent bloggers to debunk the media’s worst anti-Israel stories. Israel’s media operation is far more sophisticated today. It responded instantly to claims of an airstrike on Palestinian civilians by showing they had been hit by a PIJ rocket.

4. Qatar is becoming a positive player. Qatar had, until recently, been known as a major sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinian terror groups. But Qatar has begun to play a more positive role, limiting its funding to more legitimate uses in Gaza, and reportedly helping Egypt to mediate the ceasefire between Israel and PIJ. If Qatar joins the other Arab states that have become friendly toward Israel, within and beyond the Abraham Accords, that will be huge step toward regional peace.

5. Israel’s left-wing government may be stronger heading into fall elections. Israelis have tended to trust former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on foreign policy and national security. But interim Prime Minister Yair Lapid can now say he led Israel to victory. Moreover, the Arab party in his coalition stayed quiet, and there was little of the inter-communal Arab-Jewish violence of the previous conflict. Lapid and his allies might hope to remain in power, thwarting a Netanyahu revival.

As always, there are few certainties in the Middle East. And while PIJ may have lost decisively, other Iranian-backed groups, notably Hamas and Hezbollah, are thought to have much more sophisticated arsenals. Still, with Iran facing possible renewed international isolation in the absence of a new nuclear deal, the momentum in the Middle East appears to have shifted — and the Biden administration can seize the moment, if it tries.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Así funciona la fachada humanitaria para terroristas islámicos que financia Biden

Hace pocas semanas el presidente de los EE. UU., Joe Biden, visitó Israel. En su paso, anunció la donación de 200 millones de dólares a UNRWA en una conferencia de prensa en Belén. Esto representa una contradicción a la política implantada por el expresidente Donald Trump que había cortado el financiamiento a este programa, ya que se catalogó como una fachada humanitaria que vehicula financiamiento directo a grupos terroristas islámicos.

Estos grupos terroristas son aliados de dictaduras en Hispanoamérica y organizaciones políticas de izquierda, los cuales han facilitado su entrada en el continente mediante privilegios logísticos, territoriales, de inteligencia y financieros. La presencia de estos grupos en la región ha sido catalogada por varios centros de investigación como una amenaza a la estabilidad y la seguridad de los países americanos.

Para saber un poco más de este contexto, hemos consultado a David Bedein, quien dirige desde 1987 el Center for Near East Policy Research en Jerusalén. Este Centro ha realizado investigaciones en torno al manejo de los fondos en UNRWA, el modelo educativo implantado, los campamentos de verano a niños y adolescentes, cómo los grupos terroristas se han incorporado a UNRWA y el rol de la Autoridad Palestina en este contexto.

En sus respuestas podemos percibir que esta situación de protección y expansión del terrorismo islámico en nuestra región debería ser un tema que preocupe a los gobiernos americanos, a sus organizaciones políticas y a los organismos multilaterales.

¿Qué es UNRWA?

UNRWA es la Agencia de Naciones Unidas para la población refugiada de palestina en Oriente Próximo, fomentada en diciembre de 1948 a raíz de la guerra árabe-israelí —de 1948—, cuando siete ejércitos árabes invadieron el naciente Estado de Israel. UNRWA fue fomentada por la resolución 194 de la ONU para establecer campamentos de refugiados temporales para cualquiera que haya perdido sus hogares a raíz de la guerra de 1948.

Aunque 13 comunidades judías fueron destruidas en esa guerra, lo que resultó en la dislocación de toda su población, ningún judío solicitó asistencia de UNRWA confiando en cambio en fuentes judías de filantropía. Al mismo tiempo, UNRWA ofreció servicio a los —aproximadamente— 500.000 árabes que se habían quedado sin hogar, como resultado de la guerra. La resolución 194 de la ONU estableció 59 campos de refugiados árabes palestinos temporales bajo los auspicios de UNRWA. Estas instalaciones de refugiados «temporales» han estado allí desde entonces.

¿En qué son invertidos los fondos de ese programa?

UNRWA invierte en la salud, la educación y el bienestar de los 6,7 millones de personas que se identifican como familiares de refugiados árabes de la guerra de 1948.

¿Qué es el «derecho a retornar» que ellos enseñan en las escuelas de UNRWA?

El «derecho a retornar» representa el tema singular de la educación de UNRWA, inculcando la noción para todos sus estudiantes de que tienen el derecho incuestionable de regresar a las aldeas y vecindarios específicos que dejaron tras la guerra de 1948. UNRWA no ofrece a la población de refugiados otra opción para su futuro. El ‘derecho a retornar por la fuerza de las armas’ representa el tema de los grupos terroristas árabes que operan en la UNRWA.

¿Qué es Hamas y cuál es su propósito?

Hamás representa al grupo terrorista islámico que quiere imponer un régimen árabe islámico en toda Palestina. Hamás es una fuerza a tomar en cuenta dentro de UNRWA.

¿Quiénes son los principales financistas de UNRWA?

UNRWA es financiada por 63 países. Para el año 2021 Estados Unidos, Alemania y la Unión Europea encabezan la lista de donantes con aproximadamente 338 millones, 176 millones y 117 millones de dólares, respectivamente. Para encontrar en detalles cuáles son los países que hacen donaciones y desglosado por partidas en el siguiente enlace de la unrwa.org: government_and_eu_pledges_overall_ranking_1.pdf

¿Cuál es la misión del Center for Near East Policy Research ante esta situación?

El Centro está llamando la atención sobre la difícil situación humanitaria de los refugiados palestinos en los campos de refugiados administrados por UNRWA con una reforma sugerida de sus políticas, para adoptar los estándares de los criterios del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados (ACNUR) utilizados para la rehabilitación de refugiados en todo el mundo.

Netanyahu has this to say about Islamic Jihad

Although Islamic Jihad has agreed to a ceasefire at 11:30 pm, the struggle between Israel and the terror leaders controlling the Gaza Strip, whether they are Hamas or Islamic Jihad is a long term one.

Former Prime Minister Netanyahu told Fox News “This is a civilizational struggle. We will win.”

The former prime minister has been supportive of the IDF’s current campaign in Gaza. He met with Israel’s caretaker Prime Minister Yair Lapid today to get a security briefing and pledged his full support. According to reports, Netanyahu gave Lapid some advice from his own experience.

Islamic Jihad has been firing non stop since just before nightfall on Friday night after Israel attacked and killed one of its leaders. As the fighting has raged, Israel has successfully eliminated most of Islamic Jihad’s leadership.

In reaction to some of the false reports that Israel purposely killed civilians, the former Prime Minister explained that “the difference between Israel and the terrorists is that the terrorists hid behind civilians while firing on civilians.”

Consequences

We are currently in what is commonly referred to as “the nine days” leading up to 9 Av – the Fast of Tisha B’Av.

This annual commemoration of the destruction of our two Temples as well as our national sovereignty, which led to exile and dispersion for most Jews is also a time to remember the many other calamities which occurred through the millennia on this particular day.

While thinking about this particular sombre period a rather apt quote I read came to mind: “everything we do has consequences.”

The question at the end of the day is whether we learn from our own actions and the resulting reactions of others.

It should be crystal clear by now that appeasing bullies and those who threaten mayhem never works yet once again this is exactly what is happening. Whether it is Iran, North Korea, China, Russia or our illusory peace partners, the knee-jerk policies of avoiding harsh realities take preference over calling out and dealing with the core root of the problems.

As Iran races towards the finishing line of producing weapons of mass destruction and threatens to flatten not only Israel but also the USA, the Biden Administration dithers and the EU prostrates itself at the feet of the Mullahs of Tehran. European countries, which have a long history of looking the other way when it comes to protecting Jews and have long ago perfected the art of appeasement when bullies threaten, are once again trying every contortionist technique in order to accommodate Iran and ensure continued lucrative commercial profits.

Iran turns off the monitoring cameras and the IAEA chief warns that “Iran’s nuclear programme is advancing at a gallop” but all this elicits is one big yawn on the part of the UN.

Talking about the UN reminds us once again of the dire consequences which result from pretending that this corrupt organization and its associated human rights groups can actually be a force for justice. When Israel can be obsessively targeted and UN-appointed officials spout classic Judeophobic diatribes, the time has surely finally arrived for some decisive action. The unbelievable response that those who are caught articulating Jew hate and conspiracy theories cannot be removed from their positions cannot go unanswered.

Joining the USA in condemning this latest example of UN Jew hate were UK, Canada, France, Czech Republic, Germany, Netherlands, Austria, Hungary, Belgium, Italy and Australia. Unsurprisingly, New Zealand was once again conspicuously silent. The Palestinian Authority enthusiastically endorsed the vile sentiments expressed which means that Wellington and Ramallah remain staunch members of the immoral majority.

Apparently, only when Israel takes steps to defend itself from terror do other countries wake up and burble the usual nonsense. Otherwise it’s business as usual when it comes to Jew bashing.

Our own response also needs to be more robust. Instead of writing letters of protest and appealing to the Secretary-General we should act. How about declaring the UN “persona non grata” and expelling their officials in Israel from the country? They occupy some of the best real estate locations in the country which could be utilized to build much-needed affordable houses.

The best course of action, of course, would be to leave the corrupt UN and let the majority of morally shameful members wreck it themselves. They are going to admit the non-existent State of Palestine anyway so the time is long overdue when the democracies of this world need to gird their loins and act accordingly.

In an ideal world where fairness and justice rules and human rights are genuinely respected this is what would happen.

Unfortunately, nobody, including some of our own politicians, wants actually to follow through by taking a serious stand. As a consequence, we will all sink deeper into the mire of hypocritical rhetoric with all its attendant irreversible situations.

The longer that we continue to swallow the lie that Abbas and the corrupt PA together with Hamas are any sort of partners for a peaceful and secure future the worse the problem gets. Even some brave Arab souls have had enough of the continuing farce. A few lawyers in the PA have recently protested about the complete absence of democracy. The last elections for the legislative assembly in Ramallah and the President took place in 2006, i.e. sixteen years ago. Since then Abbas, that great champion of democracy, has ruled by decree, something these brave lawyers now find intolerable.

Three consequences are bound to flow forth.

Firstly, it is quite likely that some if not all these practitioners of the law will mysteriously be dealt with by the enforcers of Fatah.

Secondly, Abbas and his spokespersons will blame Israel for the lack of elections.

Thirdly, the UN (including New Zealand & possibly Australia) will declare their unwavering belief in the mirage of a democratic Palestinian State living in tolerance and peace in the midst of Judea and Samaria. They will be joined in this farcical performance by our own leftist lemmings as well as the motley collection of NGO’s liberally funded by the usual suspects.

As an added bonus, Abbas has already complained to the Hashemite monarch of Jordan about Israel’s “continuing crimes.” Abdullah in return has assured the PA President for life of his “unswerving support.”

In case the message is still unclear the religious adviser to Abbas proclaimed last week: “the entire area of Al-Aqsa is owned by Muslims only and non Muslims have no right to own even an inch of it. The Western Wall plaza is also part of the holy Islamic waqf and as such cannot belong to the Jews. There is no Muslim in the world who would accept Jewish ownership or sovereignty over the Kotel.” Did you by any chance read or hear any expressions of outrage? Why should the rest of the international community protest at this blatant incitement and pack of lies when our own politicians stay mute? We are being told to cede sovereignty of east Jerusalem (including the Kotel) to the Palestinian Arabs for their “capital.”

Shouldn’t we learn from history and ensure that steps are taken to disabuse our enemies and friends alike of all their false notions?

Failure to do so in a timely manner invites inevitable negative consequences.

Hamas’ ‘Saplings Of Jerusalem’ Summer Camps In Gaza Offer Weapons Training To Prepare Kids For Liberating Palestine

As in previous years,[1] this year too the Hamas movement in Gaza is operating summer camps for children and teens that inculcate an extremist ideology championing jihad and armed struggle against Israel, and also provide the campers with practical training in weapon use and other military skills. This year’s 500 summer camps, launched on July 23, are called “Saplings of Jerusalem,” and are attended by about 100,000 boys and girls of various ages. Their main opening ceremony was held at the Asda amusement park, built at the site of a former Israeli settlement. Muhammad Farawneh, a member of the camps’ central committee, said at the ceremony that holding it at that spot, “on soil that has been freed of the contamination of the occupation, is a sign that all of the [Palestinian] land will one day be regained.”[2] The chair of the summer camp committee in Gaza’s central district, Muhammad Abu Mahmoud, said at the opening ceremony in his district that the name “Saplings of Jerusalem” was chosen “to stress our deep-rooted rights in Jerusalem, and [convey] that the generation of liberation will continue to bear the banner until the occupation is removed from all of our occupied Palestinian land.”[3]

Click here to read full article 

A Biden error on refugees

View of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) building during a strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 26, 2018. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** אונר"א
עזה
בניין
שביתה

US President Joe Biden earned deserved modest praise for his visit to Israel and Saudi Arabia in mid-July, restoring confidence in core Middle East alliances. But the President made at least one major misstep: He pledged US$201 million (A$296 million) to the corrupt and bloated United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), a step back into the failed policies of the past on a trip dedicated to continuing the forward progress made in the region in recent years.

Biden’s move was wildly out of step with the current global refugee crisis, sparked by Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine in February of this year. Nearly half a year later, the epicentre of the world’s refugee crisis today is unquestionably in Europe. UNRWA, by contrast, serves only a small segment of the Middle East. In fact, UNRWA is the only agency dedicated to serving one specific refugee population. For seven decades, the Palestinians have received special treatment, while the UN High Commissioner for Refugees is tasked with handling every other refugee problem on the planet.

Worse, UNRWA has adopted the unjustifiable policy of recognising the descendants of the original refugees from the 1948-1949 war with Israel. This means that the agency’s roster of dependents continues to grow each year, even as the number of original refugees continues to shrink because of their ageing population. In other words, UNRWA has ensured that its services will always be needed; the agency that originally had no more than 715,000 refugees from the first Arab-Israeli war now has 7 million clients. Under the current policy, that list will only grow.

Biden’s support for UNRWA is also odd given that the agency has been under fire in recent years owing to credible allegations of corruption, mismanagement and extremism, to name a few. A recent study on agency textbooks validated again the shocking extent of the antisemitism found in the materials that Palestinian students are required to learn.

It gets worse. The agency has a bloated roster of employees. Its payroll is a whopping 30,000 or more. And UNRWA has been increasingly infiltrated by members of radical groups, primarily the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group that runs the Gaza Strip. Terrorists are believed to hold jobs as teachers and administrators within the agency’s bureaucracy, thanks to poor vetting and oversight procedures. Hamas has cynically wielded UNRWA facilities as shields to protect its underground commando tunnels that were deliberately built beneath or alongside the agency’s buildings. Hamas and other militant groups have a history of firing unguided rockets at Israel from sites adjacent to UNRWA buildings for similar reasons. It’s a practice commonly known as “human shields”, which is recognised as a war crime in the United States and the UN, among others.

Supporting an organisation so deeply beset with problems is a glaring misallocation of American and United Nations resources at any time. But it’s especially egregious when those resources are sorely needed elsewhere as the refugee crisis in Ukraine spirals out of control.

By one conservative estimate, 7 million Ukrainians are internally displaced as a result of the war. No fewer than 5 million refugees have already fled Ukraine. The UN predicts a total of approximately 8.35 million refugees by the end of this year. According to one British House of Commons report on Ukraine, “29% of Ukraine’s 44 million population (12.8 million people) have been forcibly displaced within the country or beyond it. The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) said it is the fastest growing refugee crisis since World War II.”

Poland, Moldova, Hungary, and Slovakia are among the front-line states in this crisis. They will need significant international assistance to absorb the massive numbers of refugees streaming across their borders. The President’s decision to throw more money at UNRWA is downright bizarre in this context.

A responsible policy would be to divert some of these resources, if not most of them, to the escalating refugee crisis gripping Europe.

Throwing good money after bad at the UN is nothing new, of course. The massive refugee crisis stemming from the civil war in Syria should have prompted a shift in policy. The same goes for the internal displacement of Yemenis from that country’s civil war, prompted primarily by the Iran-backed Houthi terrorist groups. But those crises may soon pale in comparison to the misery from the war in Ukraine.

With an acute refugee crisis already underway, coupled with a food scarcity predicted to hit next year, the time has come for a shift in global refugee policies. UNRWA sits at the top of the list of agencies that divert funds from needy refugees worldwide.

Donors from the Arab world have reportedly curtailed support to UNRWA in recent years, even before the Ukraine crisis. So have Britain and Austria. The result has been a scramble at the UN to make up the shortfall – without giving thought to why there’s a shortfall in the first place. In fact, the message is unmistakable: The world’s confidence in this agency has fallen.

For now, the damage is done. Biden is not likely to reverse course. In fact, his allocation of funds to UNRWA looks like he is doubling down on this controversial policy. His own State Department recently hired Elizabeth Campbell, formerly UNRWA’s Washington lobbyist who notoriously helped disseminate bigoted education lessons to Palestinians via agency textbooks.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has already highlighted what the United Nations can’t do: It has little to deter Vladimir Putin’s war machine. But the UN can and should continue to coordinate refugee relief; it’s an area in which it has demonstrated relative competence. As the Ukrainian refugee crisis worsens, the Biden Administration should conduct a review of its refugee assistance policies, with an eye toward optimising them. Congress can play an important role in spurring this oversight. Better efficiency is urgently needed. So is purging hate and vitriol. This should not inhibit assistance to the refugees who need America’s help the most. Neither should it mean an end to assistance programs that support Palestinians. But it should prompt a long-overdue review of the efficacy of the refugee initiatives America supports, with the goal of much-needed change.

Dr. Asaf Romirowsky is Executive Director of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East. Dr. Jonathan Schanzer is Senior Vice President for Research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. The article originally appeared in the Washington Examiner. Reprinted by permission of the authors, all rights reserved.

Israel Uncensored: Finding Loopholes to Fund the PA

While Israel’s government cabinet yesterday decided to deduct tax revenues for the PA as long as they continue to fund their “pay to slay” program, in which terrorists are rewarded for murdering and injuring Jews, experts are saying the money is still being creatively handed over the PA in the form of “loans.” On today’s Israel Uncensored with Josh Hasten, Josh argues that if Israel is going to take the international community to task for its funding of the PA and turn a blind eye to their pay to slay program, then Israel should end the hypocrisy and also stop funding the PA terrorists in suits.

<

The lethal indoctrination of children in Palestinian education

Signaling yet another unfortunate reversal of Trump-era policies, President Joe Biden was in Bethlehem on July 15 to affirm U.S. support for the long-aggrieved Palestinians.

During his meeting with Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas, Biden said that “Palestinian refugees deserve to live in dignity, to see their basic needs addressed and to have hope for the future.” One remedy for their woes, he said, is U.S. aid, namely, “an additional $201 million for the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) to continue delivering critical services to Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria.”

UNRWA, a U.N. organization dedicated solely to Palestinian refugees, has been the subject of much scrutiny and criticism, which is why in 2018 the Trump administration eliminated further funding for the controversial agency. That was a good move, since UNRWA, established when some 400,000-700,000 Palestinians became refugees in 1948, has perversely served as a political and diplomatic weapon that has kept the Palestinians stateless, as if preserved in amber, and is used as a hammer with which to bludgeon Israel. This is done by blaming the Jewish state for the conditions in which these refugees, as well as millions of their descendants, now find themselves.

Maintaining the Palestinian refugee problem as a scab on the Middle East body politic is UNRWA’s principal role. Its influence on Palestinian culture and society, however, is also profound, particularly since some 58% of its $1 billion annual budget is allocated to educational programs.

UNRWA’s mission statement purports to offer a “quality education for Palestine refugees … for the teaching and learning of human rights, conflict resolution and tolerance.” But UNRWA’s schools have been conclusively shown to be incubators of hatred in which Palestinian children are taught to loathe Zionism, Israelis and Jews; question the very existence and legitimacy of the Jewish state; justify jihad and terror against Israel; strive for martyrdom in the name of jihad; and commit to a life of resistance, aggression and terror against the allegedly criminal Zionist regime.

How UNRWA’s schools are used to indoctrinate Palestinian children is revealed quite clearly in a just-released study by the organization IMPACT-se, entitled, “Review of 2022 UNRWA-Produced Study Materials in the Palestinian Territories: Selected Examples.” The report audited textbooks used in UNRWA schools and found that children are being taught a false narrative that makes them the perennial victim of a usurping colonial occupier—the defiling Jew. Liberation, the narrative claims, can only be obtained through a prolonged struggle. “Resistance” to occupation, which is defined as the very existence of a Jewish state, is declared mandatory for all Muslims. Terror and martyrdom are portrayed as an integral and noble part of the effort.

The report notes, for example, a fifth-grade text called “Hurray for Heroes,” which “praises Palestinian militant figures such as Izz al-Din al-Qassam and Dalal Mughrabi, known for leading violent operations against Jewish civilians; both are presented as positive role models. The UNRWA material requires students to read the text and identify the Palestinian ‘heroes,’ while suggesting: ‘we all hope to be like those heroes.’”

An UNRWA booklet designed to teach numbers to third-grade students directs “them to a specific exercise in a P.A. math textbook which asks students to choose the correct number of martyrs in the First Intifada from a list of suggested numbers.” Martyrdom, of course, is portrayed as a noble aspiration. Eighth-grade study cards reinforce this same perverse aspiration, “featuring themes of jihad, martyrdom, prison and conflict.”

A sixth-grade study card, the report found, “utilizes militaristic, nationalistic and violent imagery to teach Arabic grammar principles which encourage jihad and martyrdom. Such examples include phrases like ‘We shall defend the motherland with blood’; ‘The Palestinian died as a martyr … to defend his motherland’; ‘The resistance fighter attacked the Enemy’s position.’”

The IMPACT-se report mirrors revelations of the toxicity of UNRWA teaching materials in a 2020 report by Dr. Arnon Groiss of the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, entitled, “Israel, Jews and Peace in Palestinian Authority Schoolbooks and Teachers’ Guides.” This report examined some 400 textbooks and more than 100 teachers’ guides published by the Palestinian Education Ministry from 2013 to 2020.

While the familiar narrative among diplomats and on the Arab “street” has long voiced support for the notion of “two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace,” the reality is that maps in textbooks used by Arab children do not even show Israel. In other words, the Jewish state does not exist as either a geographic or political entity. So, the idea that children or their parents have been raised to think that reconciliation is possible is a fantasy, something that apologists for the Palestinians regularly ignore.

“In none of the P.A.’s schoolbooks has any call for the resolution of the conflict peacefully, or any mentioning of coexistence with Israel, been found,” Groiss wrote. “The ‘Zionist enemy,’ according to the description appearing in the schoolbooks, is wholly evil and constitutes an existential threat to the Palestinians, who are depicted as the ultimate victim, with no shared responsibility for the conflict.”

“Moreover,” the report noted, “Israel itself is taught to be completely illegal and illegitimate.” It adds, “The name ‘Israel’ has been replaced most of the times by the epithet ‘the Zionist occupation.’”

“The struggle against the State of Israel has thus become a struggle against Zionism that is perceived as a mythical and a wholly evil entity, which creates feelings of fear and hatred,” the report states.

The Groiss report concludes that the lessons in the texts encourage and perpetuate both a justification for terror and the likelihood that it will continue to be used. “Reference to terror is more explicit in the newer schoolbooks,” the report noted. “Terrorist operations perpetrated throughout the years of conflict with Israel are presented as heroic actions in the framework of the ‘revolution,’ ‘resistance’ and ‘self-sacrifice’” (emphasis added).

The report made it clear that incitement and the teaching of hate, both in classrooms and on the Arab street, must be curbed. Educators must make authentic changes in the social, cultural and moral messages being taught to Arab children. If this does not happen, the Palestinian cause will be eternally hobbled by its blind loathing of the Jewish state.

As long as Palestinian children cling to the impossible fantasy of destroying Israel, they have condemned themselves to further generations of disappointment, disillusionment and tragedy. And as long as UNRWA and the P.A. use their schools as incubators for hatred and indoctrination, Palestinian intransigence and hostility toward the Jewish state will never disappear.

Richard L. Cravatts, Ph.D., a Freedom Center Journalism Fellow in Academic Free Speech and President Emeritus of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, is the author of the forthcoming book The Slow Death of the University: How Radicalism, Israel Hatred and Race Obsession are Destroying Academia.