Statement on World Refugee Day

Each year on 20 June, the world commemorates World Refugee Day reflecting on the ongoing suffering and hardships endured by refugees worldwide while seeking viable solutions to alleviate their plight. Meanwhile, the Israeli occupation of Palestine continues to persist, subjecting our Palestinian people to vicious acts of violence, displacement, killing, oppression, and ethnic cleansing, further exacerbating the suffering of more than nine million Palestinian refugees scattered across the globe.

In the face of the Palestinian refugees’ increasing suffering, the international community remains silent and fails to put an end to the occupation forces’ violations against them.

On this anniversary, the Palestinian Resistance Movement Hamas states the following:

First: Hamas hails the Palestinian refugees and expresses its appreciation for the refugees’ active role in the Palestinian people’s quest for freedom and return.

Second: Hamas upholds the refugees’ inalienable right to return to their land from which they have been forcibly expelled and rejects all proposed solutions aimed at denying the refugees their sacred right.

Third: Hamas emphasises that the Palestinian people will continue to resist the fascist Israeli occupation until liberation and return.

Fourth: Hamas reiterates the obligation of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) to deliver its essential services to all Palestinian refugees until their return. We firmly reject any endeavours to transfer or delegate these services to external entities.

Fifth: Palestinian refugees are an integral part of the Palestinian people who have been safeguarding their rights, principles, and sacred sites.

Sixth: We call on Palestinian refugees at home and abroad to promote unity and cooperation in the face of the Israeli occupation’s schemes and aggressive projects.

Seventh: We urge the host countries and rights and humanitarian organisations to show solidarity with the Palestinian refugees who reject resettlement plans and aspire to return to their homeland.

Hamas Movement

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

Safeguarding the Truth about Karabakh

A couple of years ago, I accompanied former Israeli Communication Minister Ayoob Kara and a group of foreign journalists on a trip to the war-torn Karabakh region, seven months after the conclusion of the Second Karabakh War, which ended in November 2020.   Former Israeli Communications Minister Ayoob Kara described then what we witnessed there to be worse than anything he experienced in Lebanon in the 1980’s.   As a veteran of Israel’s First Lebanon War, he knows what he is talking about.

Mile after mile, we drove zig-zag, as the roads were completely destroyed and surrounded by landmines.  According to the Jerusalem Post, Armenia planted over 1.5 million landmines throughout Karabakh.  Furthermore, in 2021, Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev stressed that only 25 percent of the landmine maps that Armenia has handed over to Azerbaijan are usable.    Since the Second Karabakh War ended, 302 Azerbaijani civilians have fallen victim to mine explosions, 57 of whom died and 245 of whom were severely injured.  As the British newspaper Express noted, “the Armenians used Russian made mines, but they made many copies of their own.”

Due to the massive volume of landmines planted in the war-torn Karabakh region, we passed by cars that did not survive the journey.  Our own bus also broke down and we were stranded for hours in an area full of landmines. There, we witnessed a landscape full of uprooted trees, burnt agricultural fields, destroyed cultural heritage sites, desecrated holy places, ruined villages, towns and even cities, and rivers without fish, as pollution had killed all of them.   In fact, some of the fires were still raging on as we drove by.

Back then, in the war-torn Karabakh region, there was no airport, no cafes, no restaurants, no grocery stores and no hotel except for a run-down one in Shusha, where the former Israeli Communication Minister and I were forced to camp out in without electricity.    This is because the entire area was ethnically cleansed of Azerbaijanis in violation of four UN Security Council resolutions, thus forcing one million people to become internally displaced persons as 20 percent of their country’s territory was stolen from them.

While the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission speaks of “safe-guarding the people of Nagorno-Karabakh,” it is pivotal to remember that Nagorno is a Russian word that was added to the name of the region by Soviet colonialists and Karabakh is a Turkish word, which means “black garden.”   This means that the original native people of Karabakh are Azerbaijani Turks, whose rights to this land have been recognized by UN Security Council resolutions 822, 853, 874 and 884, which were unanimously adopted in 1993.

This means that the United States also recognizes Azerbaijan’s undisputable right to the war-torn Karabakh region under international law.  In fact, Armenia illegally occupied this region of Azerbaijan for thirty years in defiance of the international community and engaged in illegal settler colonialism, where Armenian settlers literally lived among the ruins of what used to be Azerbaijani cities and towns.

Inspired by the Spanish Inquisition who placed pigs inside of historic synagogues, the Armenians decided to treat mosques in the war-torn Karabakh region in a similar manner.    None of this should be considered surprising.  After all, the Nazi war criminal Garegin Nzhdeh is considered a national hero in Armenia.  As one Armenian man who worked for a nationalist organization proclaimed in Republic Square in Yerevan, “The swastika is the symbol of the Indo-European Aryan people.  Gypsies were killed as a parasite nation.  And Hitler killed Jews because they engaged in incitement.  They have bloody money.  No difference, Jews are very harmful.  If rats live in your house, will it be good?  Do you know that in 1915 the Armenian genocide was organized by Jews?”

Unfortunately, such prejudice against the other which compares Jews to rats and Gypsies to parasites remains widespread within Armenia.  Thus, in the name of Nzhdehism, a fascist ideology that is taught in the Armenian school system and which runs the Armenian state today, all of the mosques in the region were either demolished, used as observation towers, defiled with pigs or transformed into Iranian mosques, with the indigenous Azerbaijani heritage getting completely obliterated.   More than sixty mosques in the Karabakh region were entirely destroyed.

Unlike the Greeks, who after a massive fire in 1917 destroyed the historic sixteenth and seventeenth century Ottoman-era synagogues, decided to root the Jews out of Salonika by rebuilding the city as a Hellenized cosmopolitan center, the Armenians did not even bother to do that and built homes in Shusha among the headquarters of a destroyed Azerbaijani newspaper, a destroyed Azerbaijani government office, a destroyed Azerbaijani bank, and a palace belonging to Azerbaijani poet Khurshidbanu Natavan, while the native inhabitants were compelled to live in internally displaced persons camps far away from their historic homeland.

The Armenian settler colonialists literally lived among the ruins of the nation that they ethnically cleansed from the area.    They did not even bother to rebuild Shusha in their image because they knew in their hearts that this was the cultural capital city of Azerbaijan, the homeland of countless Azerbaijani poets, musicians and patrons of the arts dating back centuries, and never really belonged to them, so they did not bother to plant proper roots there.

In 2022, I returned to Karabakh together with former Israeli Communication Minister Ayoob Kara.  By then, the roads were much better, the five-star Karabakh Hotel and the Fizouli Airport were built, the food situation in Karabakh dramatically improved, and the greenery was beginning to be restored to the area.   However, this was thanks to the heroic efforts performed by the Azerbaijani government to rebuild their homeland from nothing and had nothing to do with the Armenians.

If anything, the Armenians did everything in their power to sabotage reconstruction efforts, as over 2,700 anti-personnel mines produced in Armenia in 2021 were discovered in Azerbaijani territory.   In fact, not only did Armenia refrain from handing over all of the landmine maps and continue to plant landmines, but they also attacked Azerbaijani soldiers, cooperated with Russia to illegally extract Azerbaijani resources in violation of international law, and committed other acts of sabotage, which complicated reconstruction efforts.

As a result, it will take at least thirty years to rebuild Karabakh, if not longer.   In fact, the remnants of Armenia’s ethnic cleansing campaign remain to be seen in Karabakh to date.   Together with Minister Kara, I went to the Ivarant Cemetery, which contained the graves of prominent members of the Karabakh Khanate, dating back to the 18th and 19th centuries.   The graves were gone and the beautiful Turkic architecture of the royal tombs lay in ruins, completely run down from the Armenians utilizing these historic tombs as pig pens.  They treated this site like this even though it was labeled as a world heritage site.  According to a local guide, “The Armenians were taking stuff away from here and selling them to the Iranians.”

During his trip to Karabakh, Kara learned that for two hundred dollars, everything inside the homes of Aghdam, whether refrigerators, washing machines, family heirlooms or raw construction materials were torn from the homes and were sold to the Iranians, who were able to profit from the destruction of an entire city and the ethnic cleansing of the Karabakh region in the 1990’s.  After they took everything, they burnt everything down, thus leaving many of the homes without roofs, as the roofs were made of wood.   The Imarat Cemetery was not the only historic place that they desecrated.  They also destroyed the historic Bread Museum, complete with a loaf of bread dating from the Second World War.

The consequences of this conflict are still experienced by the Azerbaijani people to date.   Within the past month, I attended a UN conference in Aghdam, where I saw how Azerbaijani landmine victims were struggling to play soccer with amputated legs and arms.  In the past, I also visited the Mazasir Refugee Camp, where I saw how Azerbaijani internally displaced persons (IDP’s) continue to live in horrific conditions due to the fact that Armenia destroyed their homes.   Talib Mammadov, an IDP from the Aghdam region that I interviewed, stated: “In our family, there was a mother, father and three brothers.  During the First Karabakh War, all four men in my family got injured.  I also got injured in the war in the abdomen.   After that, my life changed.  Everything changed.    My life became exceedingly difficult.    I lost my homeland.   Furthermore, I was incredibly sad that Aghdam became a ghost town without people.  The tragic fate of Aghdam killed my mother.”

He told me: “Imagine what it is like to open your eyes and one day see that you did not have anything, and that you have to move to another region for God knows how long. The taste of food, the taste of water, everything is different. That is why my mother passed away in 1998, for it was exceedingly difficult for her.”   However, the Armenians did not just ethnically cleanse Karabakh and the seven Azerbaijani districts of Azerbaijanis.   They also massacred 613 innocent Azerbaijani men, women and children in one day in Khojaly for the crime of being Azerbaijani.    Over 20 US states have passed resolutions condemning this genocide.

Yasemon Hasenova, a Khojaly Genocide survivor, related: “When I was 12 years old, I experienced the terrible days of the Khojaly genocide. I lost my father, the Azerbaijani national hero Huseynov Tofig, my mother, grandparents, uncle, aunts, and my aunt’s two kids. This genocide took away my childhood. I experienced a great tragedy. I could not reconcile with the loss of my relatives.  What do you think it means to lose both parents, relatives and loved ones in one night? For 29 years, I do not know what parental love is.”

Raoul Conteras wrote in Murdered in the Mountains: War Crime in Khojaly and the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict about the horrendous sexual torture endured by the survivors of the Khojaly Genocide, a narrative which is often neglected in the West.    The testimony given by Durdana was particularly shocking: “She was bound to a chair and slapped and hit time after time.  One of the soldiers lit cigarettes for his comrades and they took turns burning her legs with lighted cigarettes.  They beat her with a metal stick, which was probably a pipe.  When his arm tired, another soldier took the pipe and continued to beat her.” A soldier mashed his boot into her face and then she was gang raped in front of the other prisoners, until she passed out.

Azerbaijani women who endured such sexual torture are forced to live with such memories and they are never again the same.   In Judaism, rape is considered to be equivalent to murder for precisely this reason as it literally slaughters the soul of the person.

Considering this history, one must emphasize that Azerbaijan did not blockade any corridor when they set up camp along the Lachin Corridor.  They merely restored their territorial integrity in accordance with four UN Security Council resolutions in order to ensure that there will be a complete halt to the Armenians smuggling weapons, landmines and other items that sabotage the peace and to ensure that there is a rapid end to Armenians engaging in ecological terrorism, after the Azerbaijani environmental activists sought to protest until monitors are permitted to evaluate the ecological damage caused by Armenia’s and Russia’s illegal exploitation of Azerbaijan’s natural resources in violation of international law.   The purpose of the protests was to raise awareness about Armenia’s environmental terrorism, Armenia’s violations of international law and the plight of the environment in the areas under the control of Russian Peace Keepers.

Azerbaijani journalist Orkhan Amashov noted, “We got evidence that Azerbaijan’s gold, copper and other natural resources are being exploited by the forces inside the Russian Peace Keeping Contingent. It is very clear that this is impunity and that something must be done about it.”  Unfortunately, this commission is completely silent about that, even though the goal of the protests was not to cause a humanitarian crisis for local Armenian residents in the area.   In fact, between December 12, 2022 and January 5, 2023, a total of 370 vehicles passed in both directions along the Lachin Corridor.   Three hundred thirty of these vehicles belonged to the Russian Peace Keepers, 31 were ambulances from the International Red Cross and another three belonged to local Armenian residents.  During this period, Russian Peace Keepers provided the local Armenian population with transports of food that included rice, canned meat, pasta, flour, potatoes, onion, chicken, vegetables, cabbage, sugar, coffee and other types of food.

It is a travesty of justice that a human rights commission named after Congressman Tom Lantos, a Holocaust survivor, would be supporting the aggressor in this conflict.   As Professor Brenda Schaffer tweeted, “I met and briefed Congressman Tom Lantos many times. I doubt he would have supported a hearing on his name which shows blatant disregard for the territorial integrity of an ardent U.S. ally and ally of Israel.”  It is a historic fact that Armenia is a proxy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.    According to the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, “Iranian munitions – the same ones now undergoing field testing in Ukraine – were actively used by the Armenian military during the previous round of fighting, and Iranian UAVs were used by Armenia in April 2023. Iranian emissaries are reported to have been seen in Karabakh, a separatist enclave populated by Armenians on Azerbaijani territory.”

Iran also opposes Azerbaijan regaining the Zangezur Corridor as stipulated in the Trilateral Agreement that ended the hostilities, as this would inhibit Iran’s ability to use Armenia to bypass Western sanctions.    As a result, Iran is doing everything today to discourage Armenia from making peace with Azerbaijan, which has led to the mistaken impression in Yerevan that they can continue to refuse to sign a peace treaty and stay viable with the backing of Putin and the mullahs.   The Armenians had good teachers when it came to learning obstinacy.

According to the political scientist Michael Gunter, “the ASALA (Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia) terrorists who seized the Turkish Consulate in Paris in September 1981 told the police they were trained in Palestinian camps.   Evidence exists that extremist Palestinian factions collaborated with ASALA in its bloody attack on the Ankara Airport in August 1982.   After its forces overran the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization) strongholds in Lebanon during the summer of 1982, Israel reported that captured PLO documents confirmed the ASALA-PLO connection.”  Unfortunately, when the US Congress hosts events like this, they help encourage Armenian obstinacy regarding signing a peace treaty and assist Iran in using Armenia to bypass Western-imposed sanctions.

Azerbaijan has noted many times that they are willing to peacefully coexist beside Armenians.   The Azerbaijanis are more than willing to grant ethnic Armenians living in Karabakh equal rights as Azerbaijani citizens.  Even though Armenia has caused Azerbaijan so much suffering, they are still waving an olive branch because they dream of a brighter future for both peoples.  While the Armenians have systematically destroyed mosques in the war-torn Karabakh region, an Armenian church is still standing unmolested in the middle of Baku.  Furthermore, as the Azerbaijanis rebuild Karabakh, they not only plan on rebuilding the mosques in the region but also the churches.  This is because Azerbaijan pursues a multi-culturalism policy, where the followers of every faith and religion receive an equal amount of respect and support. In fact, it is normal in Azerbaijan for everyone to celebrate Easter, Novruz and Passover in unison, with the members of each faith greeting each other on their respective holidays.

While many Jews in America are afraid to wear a Star of David necklace due to anti-Semitism, the two synagogues in Oghuz remain unlocked year-round with zero security, as anti-Semitism is alien to the Azerbaijani culture and way of life.  Thus, instead of this commission worrying about the plight of Armenian settler colonialists, they should focus on trying to encourage Armenia to sign a peace treaty with its neighbors, and to stop being a proxy of Iran and a stooge for Russian President Vladimir Putin, who to date uses his presence in the region in order to sabotage American and European interests in the area.

The famous Holocaust scholar Elie Wiesel once stated, “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.”   As an American citizen who was born down the street from the White House, I am utterly dismayed that the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission is desecrating the memory of a Holocaust survivor who served in the US Congress by using their name to host a panel on federal government property in honor of a proxy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who is allied with the Palestinian national movement against the Jewish people and seeks to harm one of Israel’s closest allies in the Islamic world.

Rachel Avraham is the CEO of the Dona Gracia Center for Diplomacy and an Israel-based journalist, who has published in the Hill, the Washington Times, I24, the Jerusalem Post, Israel Hayom, the Daily Wire, JNS and many other publications.  

She has an MA in Middle Eastern Studies from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and a BA in government and politics with minors in Jewish Studies and Middle Eastern Studies from the University of Maryland at College Park.   She also has a certificate in Peace Studies and Regional Security from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.   

Avraham was born in Washington, DC and grew up in Rockville, Maryland, but has been living in Israel since 2009.    She is the author of “Women and Jihad: Debating Palestinian Female Suicide Bombings in the American, Israeli and Arab Media,” which was published by the prestigious Gefen Publishing House.   She also wrote “Ayoob Kara: The Man Behind the Abraham Accords,” which is in the process of getting published.           

UNRWA’S Ever-Expanding List of ‘Refugees’

The Palestinians are indeed the most privileged and cosseted of all the hundreds of millions of refugees created in the world since 1945. For every other refugee community in the world, the only people who count as “refugees” are those who actually leave, flee, or are expelled from their country of origin. The children of these refugees, born abroad, are not themselves refugees. Henry Kissinger can be described as a “German Jewish refugee.” His son David, born in New York, is not. Vladimir Nabokov was a “Russian refugee.” His son Dmitri, born in Berlin, was not. That has always been the universal rule: the children of refugees are not themselves considered to be refugees if they are born outside the parents; country of origin. But a special rule has always applied to the Palestinians, and only the Palestinians. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, or UNRWA, was set up in 1949 to tend to all the needs of Palestinian “refugees.” But UNRWA decided to treat the children of refugees, born outside “Palestine,” as refugees themselves. And so would the grandchildren, and indeed all succeeding generations. No one seems to know quite how UNRWA managed to convince the donor nations, and the world, that such special dispensation should be applied uniquely to Palestinian refugees.

One could argue that a great many of those who were described as “refugees” by UNRWA in 1949 were not true refugees. That is, they were not fleeing persecution or killing. In fact, most of them left willingly, encouraged by Arab leaders who told them to leave “Palestine” so that the Arab armies could get in, and once the Jews had been destroyed, those Arabs of Palestine – the “Palestinians” as a separate people would only be invented in the late 1960s – could safely return to reclaim not only their own homes, but also whatever property the Jews, having fled or been killed, left behind.

More on UNRWA’s ever-expanding definition of the “Palestinian refugee” can be found here: “UNRWA gives free services to 775,000 who aren’t refugees even by its own definition!,” Elder of Ziyon, June 14, 2023.

We’ve discussed many times how the UNRWA definition of “refugee” is completely at odds with the official UN definition of refugee, drastically inflating the number of real refugees they raise funds for. They include descendants of refugees that UNHCR would never consider refugees, they include two million Jordanian citizens, they include well over two million Palestinians who are citizens of the Palestinian Authority.

The UN’s accepted definition of refugees is taken from the 1951 Convention on Refugees, and reads as follows:

Any person who…owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.

Note that nothing is said to suggest that the progeny of such a person are also refugees. Elder of Ziyon continues:

We’ve seen how their “registered refugee” metric includes hundreds of thousands of people who no longer live in their areas of operation but whom UNRWA still counts as receiving services.

We’ve seen how hundreds of thousands of today’s UNRWA “registered refugees”  were not even refugees under their own definition when it started, but UNRWA registered them anyway and today hundreds of thousands of UNRWA’s “Palestine refugees” didn’t even descend from real refugees in 1948.

Here Is UNRWA’s original definition of a refugee:

DEFINITION OF A REFUGEE

For working purposes, the Agency has decided that a refugee is a needy person, who, as a result of the war in Palestine, has lost his home and his means of livelihood. A large measure of flexibility in the interpretation of the above definition is accorded to chief district officers to meet the many border-line cases which inevitably arise. In some circumstances, a family may have lost part or all of its land from which its living was secured, but it may still have a house to live in. Others may have lived on one side of the boundary but worked in what is now Israel most of the year. Others, such as Bedouins, normally moved from one area of the country to another, and some escaped with part or all of their goods but cannot return to the area where they formerly resided the greater part of the time. These examples give an idea of the varying conditions that must be met in administering the relief programme.

Using its own definition of a refugee, should UNRWA cover those who are not “needy” — just as it has been doing? And can those who left “Palestine” between, say, November 1947 and May 1948, before the war started, be considered to be people who “as a result of the war in Palestine,” have lost their homes and means of livelihood? And are those who could have remained, but chose not to, so as to make things easier for the invading Arab armies, be considered to be ‘refugees” according to UNRWA’s own definition? In each case, ignoring its own definition, UNRWA has treated these people as “refugees.”

A Palestinian “refugee” could be living far from any UNRWA camp, say in New York or Stockholm, as a well-paid American or Swedish citizen, yet he or she would continue to be on UNRWA’s rolls, still counted as receiving services from UNRWA that in fact were not being supplied. In this way do UNRWA’s rolls never decrease, as very few people are ever taken off the rolls, no matter where they live or how prosperous they are, and that includes even those who have died but remain on UNRWA’s rolls, so that UNRWA can ask donors for more money.

According to UNRWA, they provide services to over 770,000 people who aren’t refugees even according to its own bizarre and counterfactual definition.

Doing some digging, I found the definition of “non-refugee” spouses and children.

The UNRWA definition of “other eligible population” includes: (i) “Non-Refugee Wives” – women who are (or were) married to registered Palestine refugees, and as such are eligible to register to receive UNRWA services; (ii) “Non-Refugee Husbands” and “Non-Refugee Descendants” (including legally adopted children) – husbands and descendants of women who are Registered Refugees and are (or were) married to a non-refugee. They are also eligible to register to receive UNRWA services. Once they are registered with UNRWA, persons in this category are referred to as Married to Non-Refugee (MNR) Family Members.

So being married to a “refugee” makes one eligible to access free UNRWA health and housing. Which would have made Palestinian “refugees” very attractive marriage partners! According to this, some 450,000 non-refugees have married UNRWA aid recipients – an astonishing number.

Moreover, even if the spouses get divorced, he or she can keep getting those benefits forever – and so can their descendants! Not a bad deal!

Think about that. Not only are the children, and grandchildren, and ever more distant descendants of refugees, treated by UNRWA as refugees themselves, but upon marriage, the non-refugee spouses of refugees suddenly become transformed into refugees themselves. Still better, even if they get a divorce, they remain “refugees” in UNRWA’s view forever, and for the rest of their lives, they will be receiving housing, medical care, family allowances, and much other largesse from UNRWAA non-refugee woman could be married to a refugee male for a year, a month, a week, get a divorce, and from then on be the recipient of UNRWA’s lifetime support. Nice work if you can get it.

Think of how many non-refugees get married to refugees, no matter how short the marriage may last.

What about “frontier villagers,” “Jerusalem poor” and “Gaza poor”?

UNRWA’s Commissioner-General (then Director) stated in his annual report to the General Assembly in 1961: “The Agency’s definition of a refugee eligible for assistance is narrowly drawn and stipulates the loss of both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 hostilities. Substantial numbers of Palestine Arabs do not qualify for Agency relief on the technical grounds that they did not lose both home and means of livelihood, i.e. they may have lost their source of income and may be wholly destitute, but did not lose their home. This category has become known as ‘economic refugees’ and includes frontier villagers in Jordan, some destitute inhabitants of Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, and certain Bedouin expelled after 1948. The General Assembly has more than once confirmed that, despite the undoubted need of these unfortunate people, the Agency’s mandate does not extend to them.

That was 1961. Since then, “The present Agency position is that, while registered for the purposes of receiving UNRWA services, these persons are not counted as part of the official registered Palestine refugee population. Except for descendants through the male line, UNRWA does not accept new applications from persons wishing to be registered in these categories.

So if a person was considered a “frontier villager” or “Jerusalem poor” in 1950, even though they weren’t refugees and the UN consistently said they are not to receive UNRWA services during the 1950s, today their descendants can continue to receive UNRWA benefits as a poverty stricken Palestinian – even if they live in a mansion in Ramallah.

The UN (not UNRWA) in 1950 did not consider that the Jerusalem or Gazan poor were “refugees” to whom UNRWA needed to provide relief. And throughout the 1950s, UNRWA did not consider them as such. But since then, UNRWA has managed to provide the Palestinian poor, even if living in Gaza and the West Bank, where they never were refugees, as beneficiaries of UNRWA’s largesse. And even when some of those who started out poor become rich – “living in a mansion in Ramallah,” as Elder of Ziyon puts it – they remain recipients of UNRWA benefits. UNRWA has no means test to determine eligibility; the millionaire grandson of a refugee, who like his father was born and grew up in London, can still be on UNRWA’s rolls as eligible to receive benefits. If this sounds crazy, it’s because it is crazy.

UNRWA was set up in 1949 to provide for the care and feeding of just one group of refugees – those who left “Palestine” during the 1948 war. All other refugees, who since 1948 have numbered in the hundreds of millions (and today there are more than one hundred million), are provided with just one UN body to look after their welfare — the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees). No one can explain, much less justify, why “Palestinian refugees” alone should be so favored as to have a massive agency devoted only to them.

Only “Palestinian refugees” have been allowed to pass on, as if it were an inheritable trait, the status of “refugee.” For all other refugees – there have been hundreds of millions of refugees since 1948 — that status is not passed on to their progeny, but stops with them. Those of their children, who were born in countries other than the one their parents fled, are not themselves refugees.

Palestinian refugees can not only pass on their status to descendants, but also to non-refugee spouses. 450,000 non-refugee spouses have through marriage been placed on UNRWA rolls, which entitles them to lifetime benefits. Even if they divorce, these ex-wives and ex-husbands retain their lifetime eligibility for UNRWA benefits.

The children adopted by a Palestinian refugee are also eligible for lifetime benefits from UNRWA.

UNRWA’s rolls now include many of the Gazan and West Bank poor, even if neither they nor any of their ancestors were refugees.

Many of the refugees who have died since 1949 nonetheless remain on the UNRWA rolls, thus the number of refugees UNRWA claims to care for never decreases, nor does the amount of money UNRWA asks of donors.

With each new birth of a descendant of a refugee, no matter how distant, UNRWA rolls increase, and so do demands on donors for increased aid.

Even the Arab states have stopped contributing to UNRWA. The Agency, recently wracked with money and sex scandals at the very top, needs to be put out of its – and our — misery. Let the donor aid continue to dry up, the bloated staff of 30,000 forced to make severe cuts. Above all, at long last, donors must insist — with the Americans in the lead — that Palestinian “refugees” must be treated like all other refugee groups. That means that only those who left “Palestine” because they were driven out during the 1948 war (many left because they were convinced they would soon return) should be eligible for UNRWA benefits. That will shrink the UNRWA rolls from the inflated claim of 5.7 million to less than 30,000, with the numbers of genuine refugees diminishing each day.

UNRWA gives free services to 775,000 who aren’t refugees even by its own definition!

We’ve discussed many times how the UNRWA definition of “refugee” is completely at odds with the official UN definition of refugee, drastically inflating the number of real refugees they raise funds for. They include descendants of refugees that UNHCR would never consider refugees, they include two million Jordanian citizens, they include well over two million Palestinians who are citizens of the Palestinian Authority.
We’ve seen how their “registered refugee” metric includes hundreds of thousands of people who no longer live in their areas of operation but whom UNRWA still counts as receiving services.
We’ve seen how hundreds of thousands of today’s UNRWA “registered refugees”  were not even refugees under their own definition when it started, but UNRWA registered them anyway and today hundreds of thousands of UNRWA’s “Palestine refugees” didn’t even descend from real refugees in 1948.
But this chart shows even more duplicity.
According to UNRWA, they provide services to over 770,000 people who aren’t refugees even according to its own bizarre and counterfactual definition.
Doing some digging, I found the definition of “non-refugee” spouses and children.

 

UNRWA definition of “other eligible population” includes: (i) “Non-Refugee Wives” – women who are (or were) married to registered Palestine refugees, and as such are eligible to register to receive UNRWA services; (ii) “Non-Refugee Husbands” and “Non-Refugee Descendants” (including legally adopted children) – husbands and descendants of women who are Registered Refugees and are (or were) married to a non-refugee. They are also eligible to register to receive UNRWA services. Once they are registered with UNRWA, persons in this category are referred to as Married to Non-Refugee (MNR) Family Members.

So being married to a “refugee” makes one eligible to access free UNRWA health and housing. Which would have made Palestinian “refugees” very attractive marriage partners! According to this, some 450,000 non-refugees have married UNRWA aid recipients – an astonishing number.
Moreover, even if the spouses get divorced, he or she can keep getting those benefits forever – and so can their descendants! Not a bad deal!

UNRWA’s Commissioner-General (then Director) stated in his annual report to the General Assembly in 1961: “The Agency’s definition of a refugee eligible for assistance is narrowly drawn and stipulates the loss of both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 hostilities. Substantial numbers of Palestine Arabs do not qualify for Agency relief on the technical grounds that they did not lose both home and means of livelihood, i.e. they may have lost their source of income and may be wholly destitute, but did not lose their home. This category has become known as ‘economic refugees’ and includes frontier villagers in Jordan, some destitute inhabitants of Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, and certain Bedouin expelled after 1948. The General Assembly has more than once confirmed that, despite the undoubted need of these unfortunate people, the Agency’s mandate does not extend to them.

That was 1961. Since then, “The present Agency position is that, while registered for the purposes of receiving UNRWA services, these persons are not counted as part of the official registered Palestine refugee population. Except for descendants through the male line, UNRWA does not accept new applications from persons wishing to be registered in these categories.
So if a person was considered a “frontier villager” or “Jerusalem poor” in 1950, even though they weren’t refugees and the UN consistently said they are not to receive UNRWA services during the 1950s, today their descendants can continue to receive UNRWA benefits as a poverty stricken Palestinian – even if they live in a mansion in Ramallah.
Do the UNRWA donors even know that UNRWA spends 11% of its budget on people who aren’t “refugees” even under its own definitions?
The problem is, as we’ve mentioned before, that, unlike UNHCR, UNRWA has no means to remove anyone’s “refugee” status. The vast majority of UNRWA’s “Palestine refugees” are not refugees in any sense. And now we see that even non-refugees continue to receive UNRWA services forever.
There are more non-refugees under UNRWA’s own definition receiving services today than there were real refugees in 1948. That shows, in a nutshell, why UNRWA must be abolished.

Behind The Scene With David Bedein

UNRWA Faces Funding Crisis, Announces Major Service Cuts

US Funds Withheld and Incitement Concerns Lead to Severe Reduction in UNRWA Services

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) held a donors conference on June 2 at the UN headquarters in New York. The conference aimed to raise funds for the agency, which operates 59 temporary refugee camps for Arabs displaced after the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. With 67 nations and 33 nonprofit organizations providing health, education, and welfare services to the 6.7 million UNRWA refugee population, including descendants of the original 700,000 refugees, the event was crucial for securing support.

Despite seeking to raise $1.6 billion to cover the full UNRWA budget, Commissioner Phillipe Lazzarini announced that only 30% of the budget was raised, leading to a significant reduction in UNRWA services. The majority of the budget, 58%, is allocated to education.

However, the ongoing US policy of freezing funds to UNRWA remains a significant obstacle. The US has withheld its funds until UNRWA demonstrates its commitment to the US-UNRWA Accord, which prohibits funding as long as incitement to violence persists in UNRWA schools.

Due to this policy, UNRWA cannot access the $211 million allocated by the US this year. Recent revelations, such as UNRWA conducting summer camps in honor of terrorists involved in acts of murder, further complicate the situation. The UNRWA commissioner is unlikely to witness the resumption of US cash flow to the agency under these circumstances.

Additionally, the use of a fourth-grade textbook glorifying an Arab woman terrorist who led a lethal attack in 1978, resulting in the deaths of over 30 Jews, including 13 children, adds to the concerns surrounding UNRWA’s activities.

Maps of Israel No Longer Provided in Jerusalem Hotels

Israel Ministry of Tourism Alters Distribution Policy, Citing Smartphone Usage

Hotels in Jerusalem have recently ceased providing maps of Israel to their guests. When contacted, the spokesperson for the Israel Ministry of Tourism, Haim Katz, confirmed that this change in practice is intentional. The ministry now expects guests to rely on their smartphones for accessing maps of Israel. The spokesperson clarified that privately produced maps are available upon request, but the ministry will no longer distribute maps to hotels as before.

However, a hotel administrator in Jerusalem shared an incident where they called Tourism Minister Katz directly to request a map of Israel, only to be instructed to collect one personally from the ministry’s Jerusalem office.

Maps are crucial for visitors who may be unaware of the proximity of proposed Palestinian territories to Jewish communities in Israel. While the ministry cites smartphone usage as a reason for the change, the decision has sparked questions about the accessibility and convenience of maps for tourists who may not have reliable internet access or prefer traditional printed maps.

Get thej.ca a Pro Israel Voice by Email. Never miss a top story that effects you, your family & your community

Concerns Arise Over Abbas’ Health Amidst China Visit

Fatah Sources Report Deteriorating Health, Contradicting Public Image

Reports from Fatah sources in Beirut indicate that Mahmoud Abbas, the 88-year-old head of Fatah and the Palestine National Authority, is facing deteriorating health. However, Abbas’s recent visit to China seems to contradict these reports, as he appeared in apparent good health during his arrival in Beijing, captured by TV cameras.

This unexpected development raises questions about Abbas’s health and the purpose of his trip. It is unusual for a leader coping with health issues to embark on international visits unless medically advised.

Some have expressed skepticism, wondering if the visit to China serves as a distraction from his health concerns.

It’s not a laughing matter

Quite often, one is faced with a situation so absurd that laughter seems to be the only suitable response.

On closer examination, however, it invariably turns out that the subject concerned is far more serious and warrants a much more robust reaction.

Some people react by dismissing the topic altogether and hoping that by ignoring it, the inconvenient topic or statement will disappear on its own accord. This method of dealing with absurdities is beloved by establishment figures and politicians who do not want to face hard truths. Silence may be golden, but it is suspect because muteness in the face of blatant lies and incitement is merely another form of acquiescence and a refusal to tackle reality.

This past week has been another vintage occasion where the absurd and the fake have taken centre stage and where the responses have been utterly inadequate. In fact, there has been a total non-response to some of the occurrences.

The cold peace with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is a classic example of how avoiding inconvenient facts and pretending that nothing is amiss leads to disgusting hypocrisy. This has resulted in the absurd acceptance of Jordanian guardianship of religious freedom for everyone except Jews.

This situation was starkly highlighted once again when members of an Israeli delegation tried visiting the Kingdom. It has been known for quite some time that religious Jews wanting to visit Jordan must divest themselves of any identifiable Jewish apparel, prayer books and items such as a tallit (prayer shawl) and tefillin (phylacteries). Predictably, this massive affront has been conveniently swept under the carpet in order not to upset the authorities in Amman.

According to a report in Israel’s largest circulation newspaper (Israel Hayom), a delegation of Israeli Municipal leaders experienced a humiliating encounter. Trying to enter Jordan via the border crossing in Eilat, the Jordanian border guards ordered them to lift up their shirts so that they could see whether the men were wearing any Jewish garments underneath (tzitzit). Those who were found to be doing so and who were also wearing kippot were refused entry. One member of the delegation described how a border guard took off his kippah and threw it into the trash.

The secular participants who presumably were untainted by any association with Judaism were permitted to enter the country while their religious colleagues were denied and were forced to return to Israel.

There are several aspects of this disgusting event that need to be emphasised and questioned.

 

  • Why has the Jordanian ambassador not been summoned to the Israel Foreign Ministry and read the riot act?
  • Why has this blatant example of religious and ethnic discrimination not been the subject of a Knesset investigation and debate?
  • Why has the general media, domestic and foreign, buried this scandal?
  • Why are all the usual self-loathers, post and anti-Zionists masquerading as human rights champions remaining silent?
  • Why has the UN failed to convene in emergency session to denounce Jordanian violation of religious freedom?
  • Why did the secular members of the Israeli municipal delegation proceed with their visit in the face of their religious colleagues being refused entry?
  • Why are Israeli Jews still putting up with this hypocritical double standard and continuing to visit Jordan?
  • Why does the Israeli Government perpetuate the myth that Jordan is the guarantor of religious freedom on the Temple Mount when it is blatantly obvious that this claim is an outright lie?

Can you imagine the worldwide uproar if Israel were to confiscate Korans, prayer beads and head coverings from Muslim tourists?

The lack of either domestic or international outrage at Jordan’s actions confirms that when it comes to discrimination against Jews, anything goes. Imagine what would happen if ever the PLO, Hamas and friends had sovereignty in Jerusalem or anywhere else for that matter. That is why most sane Israelis will have nothing to do with giving them the opportunity to do so.

In a recent report in the UK Jewish Chronicle the Palestinian National Council President stated that Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims have inhabited Jerusalem for over one and half MILLION years while Jews have only been in the region for six thousand years. According to his logic it followed that Palestine in its entirety belongs to the Palestinians and to nobody else which means that it cannot be shared with anyone.

If ever there was a pronouncement worthy of uncontrolled laughter, this assertion would be a prime candidate for derision.

The problem, however, is that even statements as ludicrous and historically fake as this one become the accepted gospel. Truth and facts do not matter because in this age of social media, the big lies gain traction and authenticity is irrelevant.

Knowledgeable and informed people may very well dismiss these fables and myths as the ranting of fanatical lunatics but the sad fact is that the uninformed and anti-Israel masses will lap it up. In the blink of an eye or more likely as quick as it takes to turn on a smartphone or, these moronic claims will circle the globe.

Amazingly but not surprisingly, it is not just the misinformed masses who fall for this sort of poisonous garbage.

One would logically think that given the almost daily outpouring of incitement and historical fantasies against Israel and its Jewish connection that at least foreign Governments might be prepared to take a stand.

No such luck, however, as the US State Department once again proves.

The US Assistant Deputy Secretary of State declared that “we want to rebuild relationships with the Palestinians.” The Biden Administration has provided nearly one billion dollars in aid to the PA. All this and more in the pipeline, despite the PA rewarding murderers of Israelis and promoting revisionist rubbish.

As if all this was not enough to make one convulse in anger rather than laughter, this following item should take first prize.

It seems that Israel’s Security Minister has decided to put an end to security prisoners (a polite term for incarcerated terrorists) receiving free dental treatment. When I first read this, it seemed unreal. Ordinary hard-working Israelis have to pay out large sums of money in order to receive dental care while jailed terrorists are entitled to have their teeth fixed for free!!

I am now waiting for the expected eruption of outrage from the usual suspects at the horrendous prospect of this benefit being terminated.

One doesn’t know whether to laugh or cry.

Amnesty’s new Israel report goes to war with reality

The nongovernmental human rights organization Amnesty International does some valuable work around the world. This includes bringing attention to human rights abuses such as China’s genocide against its Uyghur Muslim population, for example. Unfortunately, when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Amnesty’s work often fails the truth test.

A new report released on Monday emphasized as much. Focused on Israel’s recent mid-May conflict with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, or the PIJ, Amnesty’s report misreads both the laws of war and the nature of the battles.

Click  here to read full article. 

Imam Mohammad Tawhidi on Peace Between Jews and Muslims: Permissible and Achievable

Imam Mohammad Tawhidi is an Islamic scholar, educator, and vice president of the Global Imams Council (GIC), a global council of fourteen hundred Islamic scholars and faith leaders, both Sunni and Shia, from a wide array of Islamic sects and schools of thought. Tawhidi spoke to a June 9th Middle East Forum Webinar (video) about the prospects for peace between Muslims and Jews. The following is a summary of the imam’s comments:

click here to read full article. 

Gaza kids camp