“When I Heard My Son Died I Was Happy, Proud”

There is a new, shocking and unprecedented phenomenon among the families of the Palestinian shahids.

Um-Nidal, the mother of Mohammed Farahat, 17, who perpetrated the suicide attack in Atzmona in which five yeshiva students were murdered, encouraged her son to perpetrate the terror attacks, was party to planning the attack and had her picture taken with her son as a memento before she said goodbye to him one last time.

“I’m proud of my four sons who were all raised to carry out terror attacks against the Israelis,” said Um-Nidal, a resident of Gaza, who is named for her eldest son Nidal, 31, who is on Israel’s wanted list. Her second son, Ahmed, also went to perpetrate a terror attack, but was caught, tried and sentenced to 11 years in an Israeli prison. Her third son, Muamin, is seen regularly with the leader of the Hamas movement, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.

The Saudi daily, A-Shark al-Awsat, which yesterday published the chilling testimony of the Palestinian mother who encouraged her son to perpetrate a suicide attack, stressed that this is the first time in the history of terror attacks in the Arab world that the parents of a suicide bomber are involved in planning that terror attack in all its details, and are photographed together with the shahid as a memento, before his death.

The mother recounted, “My young son Mohammed joined Izzadin Kassam, the Hamas movement’s military branch, when he was seven. He was very close to the organization’s leader, Imad Akel, who lived in our home, and was assassinated by the Israelis seven years ago. From a young age Mohammed was a party to planning the terror attacks, and I encouraged him to commit suicide.”

When Mohammed left to perpetrate that terror attack in Atzmona, his mother took a video camera and a regular camera, and had her picture taken with him as a memento. “It was clear to me that these pictures would be a memento, and I was proud of him and his bravery. I knew the timetable of the planned terror attack, and as the time drew near, I sat at the entrance to the house and waited for the news of his death. When I heard the number of casualties the Israelis suffered I knew I should be proud. His friends reported his death to me and I was very happy.”

CNN: The Difference Between CNN Europe and CNN USA

This is a copy of letter I sent to Jerrold Kessel at CNN, jerrold.kessel@turner.com, 6/5/02

Dear Mr. Kessel,

I would like to bring to your attention more of the disturbing, growing = media bias existing in CNN Europe.

Today, after a horrific terrorist attack in Israel, the Main Page of the CNN Europe website shows a picture of an Israeli tank with its barrel aimed at the viewer.

The Headline reads,”Israeli Tanks Enter Jenin”.

When you click on the headline, the next page shows your article “Car Bomb Kills 16 on Bus in Israel”.

Why wasn’t your article with the burnt out shell of the bus on the Front Page where it should have been? This is consistant with CNN’s incessant portrayal of Israel to Europe as aggressive while minimizing and redefining terrorism against Israel.

Just yesterday, CNN edited out an interview of the mother of an Israeli baby and grandmother killed by a suicide bomber and instead tried to perversely gain sympathy for the terrorist’s mother by showing her interview instead.

Is CNN so afraid of Arab populations and pressure in Europe that it would allow itself to be used as a tool of media propaganda and slander against Israel and its army? Please address this dire situation.

Marlene Young
3409 Shelburne Rd
Baltimore, MD 21208
(410) 764-6131

Israel’s Peculiar Position

The Jews are a peculiar people: things permitted to other nations are forbidden to the Jews.

Other nations drive out thousands, even millions of people and there is no refugee problem.

Russia did it, Poland and Czechoslovakia did it,

Turkey threw out a million Greeks, and Algeria a million Frenchman. Indonesia threw out heaven knows how many Chinese-and no one says a word about refugees.

But in the case of Israel the displaced Arabs have become eternal refugees. Everyone insists that Israel must take back every single Arab

Arnold Toynbee calls the displacement of the Arabs an atrocity greater than any committed by the Nazis.

Other nations when victorious on the battlefield dictate peace terms. But when Israel is victorious it must sue for peace. Everyone expects the Jews to be the only real Christians in this world.

Other nations when they are defeated survive and recover but should Israel be defeated it would be destroyed. Had Nasser triumphed last June he would have wiped Israel off the map, and no one would have lifted a finger to save the Jews. No commitment to the Jews by any government, including our own, is worth the paper it is written on.

There is a cry of outrage all over the world when people die in Vietnam or when two Negroes are executed in Rhodesia. But when Hitler slaughtered Jews no one remonstrated with him. The Swedes, who are ready to break off diplomatic relations with America because of what we do in Vietnam, did not let out a peep when Hitler was slaughtering Jews. They sent Hitler choice iron ore, and ball bearings, and serviced his troop trains to Norway.

The Jews are alone in the world. If Israel survives, it will be solely becauseof Jewish efforts.

And Jewish resources. Yet at this moment Israel is our only reliable and unconditional ally.

We can rely more on Israel than Israel can rely on us. And one has only to imagine what would have happened last summer had the Arabs and their Russian backers won the war to realize how vital the survival of Israel is to America and the West in general.

I have a premonition that will not leave me; as it goes with Israel so will it go with all of us. Should Israel perish the holocaust will be upon us.

This piece appeared in the LA Times on May 26, 1968

CNN Statement Concerning the Interview with the Keinan Family

CNN deeply regrets any extra anguish the Keinan family has suffered as a result of CNN’s broadcast Friday night.

The Keinan family did two interviews with CNN on Friday. The first interview was broadcast live in the USA and was replayed later day. The interview was soon posted on CNN.com for its worldwide audience.

Later Friday, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer selected excerpts of the interview for the basis of a report about the family that aired on CNN in the US and to the international audience a number times on Saturday.

Our intention had been to use other excerpts from the second interview Friday night and Saturday on the international service, however this did not happen and we apologize for the error. This mistake was compounded by fact that we were running a previously recorded package on the suspected motivation of the suicide bombing.

We are airing extended excerpts from that interview on CNN International on Wednesday. Also, the second interview contained a specific message from the family to CNN’s European viewers and that will be aired later this week as a central part of a special CNN Q&A program about the European view of the Mideast conflict.

Chairman of US House Task Force on Terrorism Calls for Inquiry of UNRWA

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Eric Cantor, Chairman of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, today released a policy paper on the recent controversy surrounding the United Nations Relief Works Agency (UNRWA). UNRWA is a temporary United Nations organization tasked with providing humanitarian aid to Palestinian refugees. The organization was created more than 50 years ago with the intention of bettering the lives of these refugees. Unfortunately, it appears that camps under UNRWA’s control have become launching pads for terrorist activity against civilian populations.

“Buildings and warehouses under UNRWA’s supervision are allegedly being used as storage areas for Palestinian ammunition and counterfeit currency factories,” Congressman Cantor said. “It is disturbing that millions upon millions of American taxpayer dollars are going to fund an organization that has allegedly looked the other way when terrorists operate under their supervision. The United States is currently engaged in a war against terrorism, and I stand behind President Bush in his vow to root out terrorists and the countries that harbor them. If terrorist activity is thriving under UNRWA’s control, all U.S. funding from that organization must be withdrawn.”

The full text of the paper is attached.

TASK FORCE ON
TERRORISM & UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515

ERIC CANTOR, Virginia
CHAIRMAN

May 22, 2002

The United Nations Relief Works Agency (UNRWA) was founded in 1950 after the first Arab-Israeli War to assist and coordinate the actions of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) with the actions of Palestinian refugees. The establishment of UNRWA was the result of the Arab world’s botched attempt to destroy the newborn state of Israel and was intended to be a temporary solution to deal with displaced Palestinians in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. Unfortunately, over the last 50 years, UNRWA’s assistance has not improved the quality of life of the Palestinian people. In fact, under UNRWA’s control and supervision, the Palestinians have created an active and deadly terrorist regime.

At the time of UNRWA’s creation, the West Bank was under the control of the Jordanians, and the Gaza Strip was under the control of the Egyptians. It was not until 1967, when Israel fought a defensive war against its Arab neighbors, that the Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank and Gaza Strip fell under Israeli control. While UNRWA claims to only assist refugees who fled their homes to join Arab forces attacking Israel in 1948, it is evident by refugee rolls that this is not the case. Even though UNRWA counts nearly four million Palestinians as refugees, it is likely that many of their ancestors are not from the land that is now Israel.

Currently, 50 years after the temporary organization was created, UNRWA is still involved in the Middle East by wholly funding and largely administrating the West Bank refugee camps that are under Yasser Arafat’s control. At the center of controversy today is the UNRWA-run camp of Jenin. This camp was the focal point of the latest Israeli attempt to destroy the terrorism infrastructure of the Palestinian Authority. The Israeli military has provided ample evidence that the Jenin camp is the central command for suicide bombers. The Palestinians seem to agree, as they refer to the Jenin camp as the “suicide capital” and continue to launch many attacks against Israeli civilians from the location.

This continued assault from the Jenin camp against the only democracy in the Middle East forces us to question the manner in which UNRWA is running its refugee camps. Many allegations of abuse by UNRWA staff and of UNRWA resources have surfaced around the Jenin refugee camp. In UNRWA-funded and staffed schools, Palestinian children are taught that “Palestine’s” borders run from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. By failing to acknowledge the existence of Israel, UNWRA fosters hatred in children toward the people of Israel and the belief that Israel has no right to exist. Furthermore, UNRWA hosts summer school training camps where young students are taught tactics that further the cause of the Intifada and the supposed honor of Martyrdom. Buildings and warehouses under UNRWA’s supervision are allegedly being used as storage areas for Palestinian ammunition and counterfeit currency factories. It is even alleged that the extreme terrorist organization, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, openly controls the UNRWA workers’ union. UNRWA denies that this occurs, but has not provided satisfactory evidence to the contrary.

In Jenin, and especially inside the refugee camp, an extensive infrastructure of terrorist organizations exists. All of these terrorist organizations are allegedly under the supervision of UNRWA. These terrorist organizations include Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Fatah and are responsible for launching homicide attacks into Israel. Internal Fatah documents are available which demonstrate that even among the Palestinians, Jenin is considered the suicide capital.

For example, a letter to a Fatah official contains the following statement:
“(Jenin refugee camp) is characterized by an exceptional presence of fighting men who take the initiative (on behalf of) the national activity. Nothing will beat them and nothing worries them. Therefore, they are ready for self-sacrifice with all the means. And therefore, it is not strange, that Jenin (has been termed) the suicide capital” (A’simat Al-Istashidin, in Arabic).

Furthermore, while UNWRA claims to be a humanitarian organization, it allows terrorist organizations in Jenin to use local civilians as human shields. While terrorists launch attacks against the Israeli army out of occupied houses and apartment buildings, UNWRA turns its head. When innocent civilians are caught in the crossfire, UNRWA allows the terrorists to create sympathy for the Palestinian cause, thus swaying the Israelis from responding to attacks. The terrorists have also rigged civilian houses in Jenin so that Israeli troops would be killed while hunting for terrorists. This despicable lack of consideration for human life, which UNWRA seems to condone by not stepping in, is only one of the weapons that the terrorist groups use against their own people and Israeli civilians. Where is UNRWA while this is taking place?

Even more disturbing is the amount of American taxpayer dollars that funds UNRWA and the fact that the State Department has requested $30 million in additional aid for UNRWA this year. For Fiscal Year 2001, the United States voluntarily contributed an outrageous $101 million above UN dues. Though a finalized amount has not yet been determined for UNWRA funding in Fiscal Year 2002, there have already been calls to further increase that funding.

UNRWA has one underlying failure that will continue to prevent it from ever truly assisting the Palestinian refugees. UNRWA believes that its mandate is not to assist the refugees out of these camps, but rather to assist their living in the camps. This faulty logic, similar to that of the welfare system in the United States before 1996, leads to generations after generations of refugees remaining in camps. This means that the little or no movement out of the camps prevents the refugees from ever bettering their lives. Part of the Palestinian’s problems stem from their refugee status, so U.S. policy should enhance their lives and teach them skills so that they can abandon refugee life and live a normal life contributing to a peaceful society. Maintaining this “welfare” status quo is not helping anyone. Rather than continuing to fund this poorly mandated and misguided United Nations’ program, Congress should begin a thorough review of UNRWA’s practices. The American taxpayers deserve more responsible government actions.

Growing Demands for Investigations of CNN Israel Bureau

A non-profit organization for “Truth in Israel” has asked Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein to order an investigation launched against CNN, which the NPO alleges tarnishes Israel’s name and places the lives of Israelis in jeopardy.

In a letter to the attorney general the NPO requested that he take action against the network quickly and order an investigation launched for alleged incitement against the State of Israel and its citizens. According to the NPO, CNN’s decisions are guided by the economic and trade interests that the network has in Arab countries and not by professional criteria, as ought to be the case.

MK Avraham Herschson (Likud) has demanded that CNN broadcasts on Israeli cable and satellite television be stopped in the wake of the report run on Israel Radio’s “Documedia” program that CNN refrained from broadcasting an interview it held with Hen Keinan, whose daughter Sinai and mother Ruti Peled were murdered in the terror attack in Petah Tikva, and instead opted to broadcast an interview with the mother of the suicide bomber.

Jacky Hugi reports: Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and the Arab television network Al-Jazeera have traded barbs. Peres said in an interview to Israel Radio that “that station incites to hatred,” and a senior official in the station dubbed Peres’s statement as “stupid.”

This article ran in Maariv on June 3, 2002

As Arab Terror Recovers, Palestinian Media Returns to Old Form: Encouraging Terror, Israeli Arab Militancy and Supporting Iraq

During the month-long Israeli military (IDF) operation in the West Bank, Yasser Arafat’s voice – the Voice of Palestine radio- went silent for several weeks, as the IDF kept the Palestinians off the air.

But when the Israeli army withdrew its forces around Arafat’s headquarters and when Arafat himself actually allowed his radio and some newspapers to publish Arafat’s own condemnation of one terror attack (the May 19 bombing of the Netanya market), there was the hint of a hope that things might be changing.

A survey of the Palestinian print and broadcast media over the last two weeks, however, shows that Arafat’s state-controlled media have not entered a more moderate period, but have returned with more force to their old ways:

  • Winking at attacks on Israeli civilians, but especially encouraging attacks on Israeli soldiers and “settlers”;
  • Hinting broadly at support for Iraq’s Saddam Hussein;
  • And boldly encouraging militancy and separatism by Israel’s own Arab citizens.

“Israel is expanding its terror that is directed against the sons of our people inside the Green Line,” declared Voice of Palestine anchorman Nizar al-Ghul, opening the Sunday morning. news hour (June2).

Al-Ghul and his colleagues at Voice of Palestine radio in Ramallah and Palestinian state television in Gaza have never used the term “terror” (“irhaab” in Arabic) to define any Arab act against a Jew, and they, like Arafat himself, have never clearly labeled those who commit attacks on Jews of any kind as “terrorists.”

But over the two-week period surveyed the broadcasters of Palestinian radio and television routinely called Israeli actions “terroristic,” “criminal” and “Nazi-like.”

“The Israelis have not stopped carrying out their terrorism and their aggression against the inhabitants of Nablus and the Balata Refugee Camp,” announced Sunday Muhammad Sanouri, who reads news bulletins on V.O.P.

“In another new Nazi crime, the occupation soldiers interrupted a celebration and bound the hands of Bakir Najiy Alaan of Beit Hanina, keeping him bound for several hours,” said Sanoury.

“The Israeli soldiers also carried out their terrorism against other members of the area,” added V.O.P. announcer Sanoury, never telling listeners that Israeli authorities had already captured several suicide bombers in Beit Hanina and nearby Shuefat in northern Jerusalem in the last two weeks.

Indeed, Avi Dichter, the head of the Israeli counter-intelligence organization – commonly called the “Shin Bet” or the “Shabak”- told a committee in Israel’s parliament that 40 such bombers had been arrested or killed in the last three weeks before they reach their targets inside Israel.

Sanoury, al-Ghul and the other announcers never mention that Nablus and the Balata Camp have been bomb-making centers for Arafat’s own FATAH organization, especially the “Brigades of the Martyrs of Al-Aqsa” which has carried out scores of suicide bomb attacks on Israel in recent months.

When members of these organizations have blown themselves up inside Israeli malls, supermarkets and hotels, they are still described as “shouhada”-an Arabic word meaning “martyrs.”

The act of suicide bombing itself is described in the Palestinian broadcast media and the Arafat-controlled newspapers Al-Ayyam and Al-Hayat al-Jadida as “amaliyya tafjiriyya” -“an explosive operation” or “Amaliyyat istish-haad”-“an operation of heroic martyrdom.”

Arafat and other members of his Palestinian Authority (PA) have formalistically criticized “terror attacks on civilians of any side,” hinting that attacks on Israelis inside “the Green Line” (the pre-1967 frontiers of Israel) was “counter-productive.”

But the Palestinian Leadership and its media openly embrace those who kill Israeli soldiers and Israeli “settlers.”

In a strange Sunday morning feature that appeared right after the news bulletin, V.O.P. reporter Juma’a Kuneis described internet and computer games where virtual Israelis are virtually shot and blown up.

“Israeli and Arab ‘hackers’ attack each other regularly on this channel,” remarked Kuneis.

She offered a recommendation for one such internet game that was careful to allow shooting only at settlers and soldiers, not at targets inside Israel. “There is no sign of the explosive operations inside Israel,” concluded Kuneis

Israel, however, is a fair target for Palestinian media incitement aimed at Israel’s own Arab citizens, openly encouraging them to stake out more militant positions and to adopt a separatist stance.

“The relations of the Arab masses in Israel are in a state of constant decay because of Israel’s racist policies,” proclaimed Hashem Mahmid, an Israeli Arab member of Knesset (MK), Israel’s parliament, in a broadcast interview last week.

Mahmid and other Israeli Arab parliamentarians-Muhammad Baraka, Azmi Bashara and Ahmad Tibi-have become regular features of Palestinian television and radio, making statements they would hesitate to make on the Israeli airwaves.

“The extremist right-wing Jewish members of the Israeli parliament will not stop until they have evicted all Arabs from the parliamentary game,” asserted announcer Al-Ghul as he introduced an interview with Ahmad Tibi, the Israeli Arab MK who has also served as a political advisor to Arafat himself.

The mustachioed Tibi, who likes to strike a pose of “moderation” and “against violence” when on the Israeli airwaves, takes a totally different stance when he thinks only Arabs are listening.

“We have to assail (Israel’s) ‘democracy’-around in the world and in newspapers– because of its limitations and its inherent racism,” said Tibi, whose first profession was gynecology but who has been accused of being less than delicate in his second profession as politician.

An Israeli parliamentary committee voted last week to limit Tibi’s parliamentary immunity after at least four brawling incidents where Tibi physically assaulted Israeli police or court officers during the last year.

“Just show me who they are, and I’ll make sure they can never walk the street again,” yelled Tibi inside the Knesset committee room when told that even one or two Arab MK’s were embarrassed by his behavior and privately asked that he be disciplined. Tibi did NOT know that his comments were picked up by radio reporter outside the committee room.

“There is no one who can keep me from visiting the sons of our people in Gaza and in Ramallah,” bragged Tibi on Palestinian radio last week.

“They are my people,” he said referring to West Bankers and Gazans, “and no one can stop me.”

The growing radicalization and Palestinian media prominence of Israeli Arab politicians comes at a time when an increasing number of Israeli Arabs have been taking part in Palestinian terror operations against Israel.

The most recent publicized case involved two pairs of sisters from the towns of Arabeh and Sakhneen in northern Israel, and these cases have brought calls inside Israel for tougher policies against Arab militants.

That is why, privately, some Israeli Arabs are not so fond of the militant policies of Tibi and his fellow MK’s.

“His name is Ahmad Tivi, but inside his home town of Taibeh, people have started to make fun of him by calling him ‘Ahmad TV,'” said an Israeli intelligence official.

The Palestinian state media themselves openly court Israeli Arab citizens, who are called “our brothers inside the Green Line” or “our brothers from 1948.” The Palestinian do not use the term Israel in reference to Arabs, hinting broadly that the Israeli Arabs will one day return to join their brothers under Arab rule.

Another area of Arab solidarity in the Palestinian media is the constantly favorable attention given to Iraq’s Saddam Hussein.

The newspapers Al-Ayyam and Al-Hayyat al-Jadida both featured front page stories in their internet editions last week, supporting Saddam.

“Two martyrs in southern Iraq in missile attack by Americans,” said one headline, giving “martyr” status to Iraqis killed in the battle against American and British planes.

Another front-page story favorably summarized the chances for a mending of fences between Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

Speeches by Saddam and diplomatic meetings between Iraqi officials and other Arab officials are also always covered favorably-partly a sign of Palestinian thanks for continued Iraqi financial payments to the families of Palestinian martyrs, particularly suicide bombers who died attacking Israelis.

Indoctrinating Palestinians to hate Israel starts early on Palestinian television.

For the last two weeks, perhaps as a lead-up to the World Cup soccer tournament, Palestinian television has featured afternoon movies that include an Israeli atrocity committed against Palestinian children playing soccer.

In the short film features, which air at two or three in the afternoon (for optimum viewing by children), a gang of Israeli soldiers (played by Egyptian and Palestinian actors) decides to use the ten-year-old Palestinian soccer kids as shooting targets.

There is no reason for the attack by the Israeli soldiers, most of whom are pictured wearing kipot or yarmulkes-the Jewish skull caps worn by religious Jews.

After killings several of the kids in the middle of the field, the Israeli soldiers are seen patting each other on the back laughingly while the camera moves in for a close-up shot of the dead Palestinian children.

Fuller versions of this article available at www.theMediaLine.org

Norway’s Real Interest in the Middle East: Oil

[The reason for Norway’s interest in the middle east has to do with the economics of oil. Saudi Arabia is Norway’s no. #1 competitor in the international oil market of the 21st century. For Oslo to gain a foothood in the middle east would mean a great deal for the Norwegian economy and a boon for Norwegian intelligence.]

Production of oil in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea began on the Ekofisk field in 1971. Now, on the threshold of a new century, Norway holds the position of the world’s second largest exporter of oil after Saudi Arabia and is expected to maintain this high level of production for several years to come. After all, the country has only reached the halfway point of its so-called Oil Age.

It is not without a certain amount of excitement about industry and energy strategy that Norway is entering what has been dubbed the Gas Century: natural gas is becoming an increasingly sought-after and eco-acceptable energy commodity. Norwegian exports of gas to countries in Europe will nearly triple from now until 2005, in competition with gas from Russia and Algeria and other countries. Norwegian gas exports to Europe nevertheless have a 90-year perspective.

Norway’s position as the second largest exporter of oil may seem remarkable when you consider how much of the world’s oil is found on the Norwegian continental shelf: Only one per cent of the world’s reserves are located in Norwegian territory. Why Norway ranks so high is because it exports a total of 90 per cent of its oil production.

The situation for gas is a little different: Norway has three per cent of the world’s gas reserves and by 2005 will be one of the five largest producers of gas in the world.

European dominance

In a European context, however, Norway’s position as an oil and gas nation is substantially greater, in that Norway sits on approximately half of all remaining petroleum resources in Europe.

The Norwegian continental shelf is four times as large as mainland Norway and accounts for one-third of Europe’s continental shelf.

The development of the Norwegian continental shelf has taken place by leaps and bounds: today it takes only three days to produce as much oil as was produced in all of 1971 – the first year of oil production from the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. Norway’s Oil Age is commonly referred to as the “oil adventure”.

A long Norwegian maritime industry tradition, featuring some of the world’s largest fisheries and shipping fleets operated from Norway, has been extended with the most modern technology needed to utilize the ocean’s resources today.

The numbers speak for themselves: In 1998 oil and gas made up one-third of Norway’s total exports, over 40 per cent of total investments, 12 per cent of all value creation in the country and 13 per cent of the gross domestic product.

There can be no doubt that Norway lives in a so-called petroleum economy, with all of the advantages and disadvantages this entails, e.g. fluctuating oil prices.

More than 90,000 people work in the oil industry today. Around 20,000 are shift workers on the oil and gas platforms in the North and Norwegian Seas, Norway’s two main oil and gas-producing areas.

Government petroleum fund for the future

The Norwegian government is an active participant in and co-owner of Norwegian petroleum operations, both through the state-owned oil company Statoil and the government’s direct financial involvement. Norway currently enjoys huge revenues from oil, but in order to meet economic challenges after its oil runs out, part of the state oil revenues are set aside in a so-called petroleum fund.

In other words, Norway’s petroleum wealth is being converted into financial assets in order to safeguard the future of the Norwegian welfare state.

Arctic exploration

Despite intense exploration, no discoveries have made and developed at this time in the third main area-the Barents Sea in the Arctic part of Norway.

Plans to develop the so-called Snøhvit field on the Tromsø field are in hand and can be realized in a few years. Snøhvit would then become the first fixed point in the so-called northern areas, where substantial gas reserves have been found on the Russian side of the Barents Sea.

Cooperation in the petroleum sector is one of two subjects currently being discussed by Norway and Russia in connection with the negotiations over the sector line in the Barents Sea.

As big as Texas

Norway has been looking for oil and gas in the north since 1980 but has yet to find appreciable deposits. Despite the disappointments, oil companies in Norway will continue to explore the Far North, with its vast potential. The net exploration area in the Barents Sea makes up two-thirds of the Norwegian continental shelf and is equal in size to Texas.

The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate calculates that 27 per cent of the undiscovered petroleum resources on the Norwegian continental shelf are located in the Barents Sea, which must be regarded as the frontier region of the Norwegian continental shelf compared with the North and Norwegian Seas.

North Sea biggest

The North Sea will for many years nevertheless remain the hub of the Norwegian petroleum industry while the development of the Norwegian Sea continues. The Ekofisk, Frigg, Oseberg and Snorre fields in the North Sea are some of the most expensive and technically complicated industrial projects in the world. All have been financed via large joint ventures involving the world’s largest oil companies.

From 1971 to 1996 a total of NOK 1,500 billion was invested in exploration, construction and operations on the Norwegian continental shelf. This is equivalent to what it takes to run the entire country for three years at the 1999 level.

Similar investments are expected from now until 2025 provided the price of oil stays at a “reasonable level” by Norwegian standards.

Started in Groningen

The discovery of an enormous gas field on land in the Dutch province of Groningen in 1959 prompted the world’s largest oil companies to prospect for oil and gas in the North Sea: Geologists believed that the same geology had to stretch out into the North Sea.

Western Europe was already then a growing oil market-and now gas from Groningen would create the foundation for a gas market in Western Europe too. Already one of the world’s largest, it is destined to grow even bigger in the next century.

Still oil and gas

Calculations indicate that fossil fuels, particularly oil and gas, will dominate the world’s energy markets for 40 to 80 years into the next century.

It is precisely during this period that Norway will produce most of its remaining oil and gas deposits. Fresh resource estimates from the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate show that only one-third of the oil-and only nine per cent of the gas-believed to exist on the Norwegian continental shelf has been produced so far.

On the waiting list

The bulk of future production will for many years continue to come from the 56 oil and gas fields already in production in the North and Norwegian Seas.

In addition, 136 small and medium-sized discoveries are waiting to be developed. Thirty of them will be developed over the next 10 years and a further 50 in the subsequent decade, according to fresh estimates from the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.

From the very start in 1966-when the world’s oil explorers arrived in Norway-the North Sea was described as the “world’s harshest exploration area for oil and gas”.

The development of Norway’s oil riches involved considerable trial and error before the exploration platforms and production facilities were adapted to the North Sea’s challenging environmental conditions.

Taller than the Empire State Building

While equipment and know-how in the beginning had to come from the outside, Norway gradually built up both competencies and technologies adapted to the special conditions of the Norwegian continental shelf.

The linchpin in this process is the Condeep platforms, the gargantuan steel and concrete production platforms which, if placed beside the world’s largest and best-known buildings, would tower above the Eiffel Tower in Paris or the Empire State Building in New York.

Norwegian concrete technology has also been employed in the world’s first Arctic offshore oil development-the Hibernia field outside Newfoundland.

Consequently, the North Sea quickly acquired a reputation as a laboratory for developing offshore oil and gas technology. There is only one difference between large land-based projects and today’s offshore technology: the installations are hidden from people by the sea. Only those working out on the platforms can experience how far the boundaries of technology have been stretched to pump oil and gas from the depths of the ocean.

A universe beneath the sea

Fantastic development has taken place within what can be called quieter technology, e.g. seismic surveying and greater precision in and remote control of drilling operations. Seismology is a type of ultrasound technique that makes it possible to peer into the bottom of the ocean where oil and gas may have been formed hundreds of millions of years ago, thousands of metres underneath the seabed.

The knowledge amassed today about the ocean is so great that people talk today about a “universe beneath the sea” in which not least petroleum activities have brought about great progress, including on the Northeast Atlantic continental shelf where Norway has extensive petroleum operations.

Challenging nature

Another invisible technical experiment that has succeeded 100 per cent in Norway is enhanced recovery. When oil production started on Ekofisk in 1971, it was thought that only 17 per cent of the oil deposits present in the ground could be recovered. Norway was unwilling to accept this and decided to challenge nature’s own processes.

Thanks to the injection of water, gas, chemicals and horizontal drilling, oil recovery on the Norwegian continental shelf currently averages 44 per cent; the goal is 50 per cent and perhaps more if technological development continues at its present pace over the next 10 years.

Enhanced recovery allows Norway to earn several hundred billion extra kroner and has taken on greater importance other places in the world, including Canada and the U.S.

Akin to space travel

The future challenge on the Norwegian continental shelf lies in developing new more simple technology, even better drilling methods and seismic technology, deepwater development, and having a major portion of operations run by remote control on the seabed or down in the production wells. From a technical and economic point of view, this is just as challenging and demanding as space travel.

Norway’s Oil Age began at a depth of 70 metres in the southern part of the North Sea-and even the biggest and best companies with experience from all over the world took a hammering from the North Sea in those initial years, whether the depth was 70 or 100 metres.

Today the Norwegian oil industry has experience in drilling at depths of 1,200-1,300 metres in the Norwegian Sea and drilling is done to a depth of 5,900 metres at a distance of up to nine kilometres from the mother platform.

The whole operation is controlled and operated from fixed or floating platforms on the surface of the ocean. A steadily increasing number of production systems are being installed on the seabed and operated by remote control using space technology principles.

Deep-water future

Preparations are currently underway to develop the huge Ormen Lange gas field in the Norwegian Sea, at a depth of 1,100 meters. Yet another epoch awaits: deep water, as in rest of the world. This is the future facing a country which for centuries has used the sea as an economic resource in building up its prosperity through fishing and shipping.

The oil and gas epoch has already expanded and pushed all Norwegian maritime skills and knowledge forward-with more to come.

The sea rules

The preface to a major work about Norway states: “If people are to live on the coast, they have to come to terms with the ocean.”

Norway and Norwegians have been doing this for centuries. The oil and gas age is nevertheless a distinct epoch, whose scope may perhaps take another 100 years to fully comprehend.

A major element in the development of the Norwegian offshore oil industry has been safety: the safety of workers and the safeguarding of the environment, assets and regular production. Sprinkled like islands throughout Norwegian ocean areas, which are also a gigantic larder, are rows and clusters of oil and gas platforms that are in essence highly productive floating factories manned by thousands of oil workers from all over Norway.

Like the Vikings, mariners and fishermen before them, Norwegians have learned to relate to the sea in a new way. Oil and gas have set new parameters for Norway, and the country has risen to the challenge.

January Hagland is Director of Information for the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.

Hen Keinan: “CNN Interview About My Murdered Daughter Turned Into a Show About the Terrorist’s Mother

The parents of the infant Sinai Keinan, who was murdered last week in the terror attack in Petah Tikva, were interviewed last week on CNN, and tearfully told the story of their loss.

When they later viewed the program, they said they were alarmed to see that instead of their story, only the mother of the terrorist who carried out the terror attack appeared on the program.

Last Friday Hen Keinan and her husband Lior were asked to be interviewed on the CNN program called “International Hour”. This is a program that is broadcast in many countries all over the world. They were asked to talk about their feelings following the murder of their 14 month old infant daughter, Sinai, and Hen’s mother, Ruti Peled, 56, who was also killed in the terror attack.

Hen, who speaks English well, and her husband Lior, already prepared at the hospital, very carefully, the message they wished to convey to the world, and “especially to the Europeans who give legitimacy to terror.”

Before the taped interview began, Hen was asked to speak, in a live broadcast, to an American broadcast of the network, and among other things, she said: “We love you. Help us as much as you can”.

Afterwards the two went for a special interview. The journalist who interviewed them, asked Hen, among other things: “How do you feel”? And she responded with a question: “Do you have a mother? Do you have children”? “Close your eyes for a minute and imagine that they were murdered in front of your eyes. Only then will you know in what hell I live”. Her husband, Lior, showed the journalist the broken parts of Sinai’s baby carriage, and all the members of the broadcast team shed tears.

“That same evening”, related Hen painfully, “We sat down to watch the special interview with us, and instead, to our amazement, we got only the interview with the mother of the terrorist who carried out the terror attack in which my daughter and mother were murdered”.

The terrorist’s mother related during the interview, among other things, that before he left on his mission, she gave him her blessings.

“Only the day after were portions of my interview broadcast, in another program, with my statements having been edited”, related Hen last night on the Israeli TV show, Documedia. She said that the special interview with her was not even broadcast. She expressed anger about the “unfair and unprofessional” treatment by CNN. Hen said that she expects that in wake of this, the Israeli Foreign Ministry would remove foreign journalists from Israel, as they serve the Palestinian public relations goals.

CNN had made no comment to make.

This piece ran in Yediot Aharonot on June 3, 2002

Secret Middle East Talks in Britain

Israelis and Palestinians have met in Britain to hold their highest-level talks since the failed Taba meetings of January 2001. Key figures in the Northern Ireland peace process were brought in for the first time to advise the belligerent parties.

In three days of discussions, hosted by the Guardian, Irish politicians, including the former IRA commander Martin McGuinness and David Ervine, leader of the Progressive Unionist party, urged both sides in the Middle East to seek outside help in moving the conflict out of its impasse.

“If you had said 10 years ago that there would be peace in Northern Ireland or South Africa, many would have been extremely sceptical, but there is no reason why the Middle East should not take the same road,” Mr McGuinness said.

For the past 18 months senior Palestinians and Israelis have only had snatched meetings on an individual basis. Yesterday’s talks brought together two Palestinian ministers with the speaker and deputy speaker of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, and marked a rare chance for the parties to debate, away from the pressures of conflict.

The Israelis and Palestinians said they had learned lessons they would take back to the region. Several plans for pushing forward the stalled peace process began to take shape, including joint Israeli- Palestinian initiatives.

The secret talks, chaired by Jonathan Freedland, were held at Weston House, a country house near Stafford where Northern Ireland negotiations were conducted last year.

Alan Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, said that the Northern Ireland delegates were “great evangelists for their peace process and were keen to offer practical advice and heartfelt encouragement. The two situations are, of course, different in many ways. But this group found so much in common and genuinely felt they learned much from each other over the three days.”

As well as Avraham Burg, speaker of the Knesset, the Israeli side included General Amnon Lipkin-Shahak, the former chief of staff of the Israeli army; Yossi Beilin, the former justice minister and one of the architects of the 1993 Oslo peace accords; and Naomi Chazan, the deputy speaker of the Knesset.

The Palestinian side included Professor Nabeel Kassis, a Palestinian minister without portfolio; Yezid Sayigh, a former negotiator; and Salim Tamari, another former negotiator. Mr Burg and Mr Beilin are members of the Israeli Labour party, which is in Mr Sharon’s coalition government.

The Northern Ireland quartet was made up of: Martin McGuinness, now Northern Ireland education minister; David Ervine, who temporarily walked out of Weston Park talks last year; Mark Durkan, leader of the nationalist Social Democratic Labour Party; and Sir Reg Empey, one of the leaders of the Ulster Unionist party.

Absent from the talks was anyone from the Likud party, which is led by the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon.

New initiatives to emerge from yesterday’s talks include:

  • creation of a shadow Israeli-Palestinian government as an alternative to Mr Sharon’s government
  • drafting of a peace plan that will flesh out the proposals at Taba, including setting out for the first time an exact figure of how many of the 3.5 million Palestinians will be given the right to return
  • a draft document setting out two or three points about how to secure peace to be signed by key Israeli and Palestinian figures and published.

This piece ran on Saturday June 1, 2002 in the Guardian in London.