Mohammad Raad, who heads Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc, says that the “resistance” (a reference to Hezbollah) stood to the right of the authorities in Lebanon during the indirect negotiations they conducted with the “Israeli enemy” regarding the maritime demarcation borders.
Raad stated that Hezbollah’s goal was to strengthen Lebanon’s position in the negotiations, and thanks to this, the agreement on gas production in the Mediterranean Sea was reached.
“We are still delaying the publication of our final position regarding this understanding, even though we know its many details, and the reason is simple, which is that we do not trust this enemy or his masters,” he continued.
Raad emphasized that “the weapon of the resistance (Hezbollah) is the guarantee that the parties will not deviate from the content of the understandings and their essence… these understandings will not exist and will not last long unless we are strong.”
Israel’s security cabinet voted on Wednesday afternoon to back the maritime boundary deal with Lebanon, sending the tentative agreement to the full cabinet for ratification.
Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked voted against the agreement, while Alternate Prime Minister Naftali Bennett backed the agreement, even as he downplayed its significance.”
“This is neither a time for a victory lap nor for lamenting, as if this were some kind of catastrophe,” Bennett said. “This agreement is not a historic diplomatic victory, but at the same time it is not a terrible defeat. This is a necessary arrangement, made obligatory by the situation we are in, with problematic timing.”
“Unfortunately, even this meeting on an important security issue for Israel, based on strategic needs, was carried out with political considerations mixed in, from all sides. As someone with no political interests, I learned the subject in depth and I made my decision responsibly.”
Despite pressure from the opposition to bring the deal to a vote in the full Knesset, the government will only allow the Knesset to review the agreement, but without holding a vote on the matter.
On Thursday, Lebanese President Michel Aoun confirmed that the country has approved the US-mediated maritime border deal with Israel.
“This indirect agreement responds to Lebanese demands and maintains all our rights,” Aoun stated.
In his remarks, Aoun also thanked Hezbollah and said, “A double thank you to you, Lebanese men and women, because through your steadfastness, your stability, your resistance proved to be a factor of strength for Lebanon – you contributed to the strengthening of the Lebanese position in the negotiations and the conflict, and you accomplished this achievement for you and for future generations.”
Lapid hailed the maritime agreement with Lebanon as a “great achievement for the State of Israel, for Israel’s security and for Israel’s economy”.
Opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, accused the government of surrendering to Hezbollah.
World Israel News reported on Wednesday that after the cabinet approved the agreement, Prime Minister Yair Lapid said war with Hezbollah will be “less likely.”
In a press conference Wednesday evening, Lapid said, “Israel is not afraid of Hezbollah. The IDF is stronger than any terrorist organization. At the same time, if we can avoid a war, it is the job of any responsible government to do so.”
“Instead of war, the agreement gives Israeli citizens billions and energy security for the coming years,” claimed Lapid.
WIN also reported that on Wednesday morning, Lapid convened a meeting of the Security Cabinet to deliberate on the agreement, which cedes waters previously claimed by Israel to Lebanon, including part of the Qana offshore gas field.
With just under two weeks until Election Day, and Israel’s continued standing as a bastion of democratic stability and regional military superpower at stake, many recent contradictory revelations concerning the military service of Israel’s alternative and caretaker Prime Minister, Yair Lapid, have only reinforced the pervasive feeling that he has been less than honest with the public and raises questions about his capability to lead the State of Israel. While no one doubts that Lapid served three years of military service as a military correspondent, recent revelations have raised numerous unanswered questions as to how he evaded combat service with no hard evidence or information being provided by the acting Prime Minister’s office as to how he became a military correspondent, and how he has been able to keep what should be easily accessible information about his military service from being disclosed. If Israel had an objective media, journalists could have been expected to provide critical information and due diligence in their reporting about Yair Lapid’s questionable military service, however what we got instead, with a few notable exceptions has been a media silence and cover-up of what should have forced Yair Lapid to immediately resign from public service.
Israel is a small country, and it’s virtually impossible to make claims about one’s military service without someone else who was there on the front lines who can verify what has been claimed. I, like thousands of others served in Lebanon during Israel’s first Lebanese War in 1982. Many of us served in the very same units and participated in the very same events that Yair Lapid claimed that he witnessed or participated in. Lapid has claimed that he served in battalion No. 195 of the 500th Armored Division in Lebanon. Much of what Lapid has claimed over the years is not only impossible but proves that he has no idea of how forward units operate other than what he himself read, wrote, or invented as a gifted reporter.
During the period of two years that I served as a divisional mental health field officer in the Beirut area and later in the Eastern front, I examined, assessed, and treated many soldiers suffering from PTSD and other emotional states that were common among soldiers in the front lines including psychosomatic reactions such as asthmatic attacks. This type of reaction is commonly referred to as the fight-or-flight response, also known as the acute stress response, and refers to the physiological reaction that occurs when in the presence of something mentally or physically terrifying. This response is triggered by the release of hormones that prepare your body to either stay or deal with a threat or to run away to safety. Lapid chose the latter, and ran away to the safety of a cushy position as a military correspondent in the heart of Tel-Aviv Yafo. Lapid didn’t run away from the front lines or the heat of battle but rather from the riggers and mundane regiment of basic training.
Lapid began his basic training at an Air Defense unit that was nowhere near Lebanon during the weeks of military training. Only soldiers with a medical profile of 65 and above were allowed to serve in combat areas, Lapid has claimed that his medical profile was lowered to 45 as a result of an asthma attack. Lapid has also claimed that he was present during an operational event that was known to many and widely reported because of its tragic ending and the involvement of Brigadier General Doron Reuven ז”ל who was promoted to head the 500th Armored Division only three days before the outbreak of the first Lebanon War. During the battle at Ein Zachlata, three officers in a jeep crossed inadvertently beyond enemy lines controlled by Commando Syrian forces. Two officers were killed immediately and the third officer was injured. General Doron Reuven ז”ל crossed enemy lines, under fire to retrieve their bodies and save the surviving officer. Yair Lapid has claimed that he was on that jeep and claims that he was saved by getting off the jeep to go eat lunch on the way. Lapid’s claim that he was involved in this heroic event is a disgrace to the honor and bravery of General Doron Reuven ז”ל and blessed memory of the officers killed in this tragic operational event.
The relevancy of this event and Yair Lapid’s alleged involvement tells us much about his psychological makeup when push comes to shove. Lapid’s actions over the past three months as alternative and caretaker Prime Minister have “flight” written all over them. The most recent example of his natural predisposition to run away rather than stand his ground can best be seen in the recent negotiations with the State of Lebanon concerning negotiations on the gas and oil fields in the Mediterranean Sea opposite the northern coast of Israel. Lapid was personally involved in negotiating and concluding a maritime agreement with Lebanon, an enemy state that has publicly claimed that the agreement will obligate Israel in perpetuity. According to a report by Caroline Glick : “The Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) agreement Israel concluded with Hezbollah-controlled Lebanon will fundamentally alter Israel’s maritime borders, deny the Jewish state tens of billions of dollars, which will go instead to a government controlled by Iran’s Lebanese foreign legion, Hezbollah, and transform Hezbollah and Iran into actors in the eastern Mediterranean.”
Leaders of nations have an obligation to stand up and preserve the national interests of the nation that they are leading. They must make every effort to put up a fight and not forfeit legitimate territorial claims and secure borders for the nation that they lead. Yair Lapid doesn’t have the psychological make-up for standing up and fight, but chooses instead to stand down as he did during his military service. Lapid’s surrender to Lebanon, a failed state in total chaos controlled by the Hezbollah terrorist organization wholeheartedly controlled by Iran is a testament to Lapid’s personal inclination to choose flight rather than fight, as he has done throughout his political career and during his military service.
“Israel seems to be going to supply weapons to the Kiev regime. A very rash step. It will destroy all interstate relations between our countries,” he said on his Telegram account.
The statement is ominous as Russia is in the middle of a counter attack after the Kremlin pulled back its troops from the Northeast. The newest Russian general to command the war effort is nicknamed the Armageddon General and has been given a green light to use whatever means necessary to win.
Medvedev was answering what appears to be Ukraine’s intention to ask Israel for military aid after Russia’s use of Iranian drones on Kiev. “We will send an official request to Israel for immediate delivery of air defense systems and cooperation in the field,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said in an official statement.
While Israeli PM Yair Lapid has been far more vocal in his support of Ukraine than his predecessor Naftali Bennett who continued Bibi Netanyahu’s policy of neutrality, but Lapid has so far refrained from arming Ukraine directly.
If the current caretaker government does in fact arm Ukraine, Putin’s response will be significant and extreme. After all, outside of the Ukraine, the largest amount of Russian troops on foreign soil is in Syria – not too far away from Jerusalem.
The problem with the drones that Iran is supplying Russia is not that they are significantly improving the military achievements of Vladimir Putin’s army on the various battle fronts in Ukraine.
The cameras installed on the Qods Mohajer-6 drones do improve the Russian army’s ability to collect intel from the battle field, and help it trace artillery and anti-aircraft forces, and movement of Ukrainian armored columns.
The United Nations praised the role of Qatar’s Assistant Foreign Minister Lolwah Al Khater and the Gulf nation for its support of Palestinian refugees.
In a meeting in Doha between Al Khater and the UN’s Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), the Qatari official was described as “a great advocate” for Palestinian refugees.
The agency was represented by Tamara Alrifai, UNRWA’s Director of External Relations and Communications.
“Assistant Foreign Minister Lolwah Alkhater is a great advocate for Palestine refugees, here in discussion about UNRWA’s role in protecting rights and contributing to stability in the region through our programmes especially in education,” said UNRWA.
The agency also applauded the Gulf state’s “longstanding support” of Palestinian refugees, as Al Khater “commended the outstanding work done by UNRWA”.
“Qatar’s historical support to the Palestinians stems from the moral stance of its leadership and people. I shall remind ALL of their duty to stop the shameful attacks of the Israeli occupation on Islam’s 3rd holiest mosque Al-Aqsa,” tweeted Al Khater.
Doha has continued to provide much-needed support to Palestinians through UNRWA with the help of various Qatari entities for more than 70 years.
Some of the local organisations include the Qatar Fund for Development (QFFD), Education Above All (EAA), and Qatar Charity. With Qatar’s help, the organisation was able to provide humanitarian assistance to more than five million Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan.
UNRWA was formed in 1949, a year after the launch of the Nakba, or catastrophe, in which Israel forcibly displaced and killd Palestinians.
Between 1947 until 1949, at least 750,000 Palestinian from a 1.9 million native population were forced out of their own land by Zionists militias who later established Israel.
At least 450 towns and villages were depopulated.
There are up to 5.6 million Palestinian refugees, with at least 28.4% scattered in 58 UNRWA-run camps in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza.
More than 70 massacres have been committed by the Israal as it continues to forcibly displace Palestinians.
Qatar’s support
In April, Qatar Charity contributed $1.5 million to the UN agency to support at least 90,300 Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip. The donation provided the beseiged population with food aid that benefitted them for three months.
Last year, the QFFD contributed $1,252,800 towards the UNRWA Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) programme in Syria. The major contribution was under an initial donation of $20.7 million in 2019.
QFFD aimed to provide support to at least 438,000 Palestinian refugees in Syria who have been bearing the consequences of the worsening situation. In addition to their forced displacement by the Israeli occupation, Palestinain refugees suffer under the violence of the Syrian regime.
In 2020, QFFD donated $1 million in cash assistance to Palestinian refugees in Syria grappling with the conflict coupled with the Covid-19 outbreak. The donation was also part of the 2019 agreement between the Qatari organisation and UNRWA.
Qatar’s ongoing support for Palestinians comes as part of its advocate support for Palestine as the Israeli occupation continues.
The Palestinian cause has long been at the heart of Qatar’s foreign policy, with Qatari officials continuously condemning the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestine and slam its ethnic cleansing of indegineous Palestinians.
During his speech at this year’s United Nations General Assembly in New York, Amir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani highlighted key issues concerning the Middle East region.
Amir Tamim renewed the need to implement international resolutions and press Israel to end its illegal occupation.
“The Palestinian cause is still unresolved, and in light of the failure to implement the resolutions of international legitimacy and with the persistent change of facts on the ground the settler-occupation has pursued a fait accompli policy,” said Sheikh Tamim.
The leader renewed Qatar’s full solidarity with Palestinians “in their aspiration for justice” while calling on the Security Council to “compel Israel to end the Palestinian territories’ occupation.”
The latest developments come amid a wave of controversial moves by some Arab nations to normalise ties with Israel.
In 2020, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain signed the Abraham Accords to establish full ties with Tel Aviv, in a move condemned by Palestinian factions across the board as a betrayal of their cause.
When it comes to major international conflicts throughout history, the Palestinian leadership has often, if not always, chosen to support “the wrong side.” From Adolf Hitler to Saddam Hussein, and now Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has opted to side.
During World War II, the Palestinians faced the decision to either support the Axis alliance or the great Allied powers. They chose the German Nazi Reich. Their then-leader Mufti Hajj Amim al-Husseini spent the duration of the war in Berlin, and allegedly advised Hitler to destroy all Jews in the Arab world. Local Arab communities were ecstatic when Nazi general Erwin Rommel invaded Egypt, and headed for Palestine.
Aprovocative ad campaign against antisemitism that used a digital image of Hitler raising his right arm concerned many at UC Berkeley this week and disturbed members of the Jewish community, according to the campus Hillel.
It also sparked ire. On Thursday, vandals threw “several” rocks at the vehicle, according to an organizer of the campaign, scaring its driver and damaging the truck and “part of the graphic,” the organizer said. In photos, a green patch on the display is visible where one of the rocks hit.
The Washington, D.C.-based conservative nonprofit Accuracy in Media sponsored the campaign, which was meant to oppose what the organization described as Berkeley Law’s “ban on Jews.” The campaign launched after a group of law students passed pro-BDS resolutions in August that included bans on hosting speakers who support Israel.
The truck said: “All in favor of banning Jews, raise your right hand.”
The BDS measures, which J. covered at the time, concerned Jewish and pro-Israel students on campus, but were thrust into the national spotlight more recently after an op-ed in the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles used Nazi language to describe them. “Berkeley Develops Jewish-Free Zones,” in which attorney Kenneth J. Marcus argued that the bylaws were plainly discriminatory against Jews and represented civil rights violations, gained the attention of the national and Israeli media and was shared by prominent figures such as Barbra Streisand and Sarah Silverman to millions of Twitter followers.
The op-ed also prompted rebuttals, including from Jewish UC Berkeley professors who criticized the headline as misleading considering Berkeley’s robust Jewish community and Israel scholarship, and from Jewish journalist Rob Eshman who called the article “factual dross.”
The truck scared the crap out of us.
The mobile ad campaign consisted of a black box truck bearing digital images of a uniformed Adolf Hitler alongside other Nazis. It had been parked in front of Berkeley Law, according to Accuracy in Media president Adam Guillette, but then circled the campus after the rock-throwing incident.
The impetus behind the campaign, Guillette said, was outrage over a rise in antisemitism on college campuses.
“Things have gone from ‘very bad’ to ‘even worse,’” he wrote in a text message from an airplane to J., saying he had met with “thousands of students on literally hundreds of campuses throughout North America over the last two decades.”
“The amount of hatred, intolerance, and antisemitism is morally outrageous and it’s time for us to (non-violently) fight back,” he wrote.
As to criticism that the campaign was disturbing, Guillette said, “the growing anti-semitic climate on America’s universities is exceptionally disturbing, and it’s time we stood up to these hateful bullies.”
Reporting about $2 million in annual revenue, Accuracy in Media is a group “working to expose bias in mainstream” media, according to its website. It publishes investigations exposing what it views as a media slant toward progressivism on issues ranging from abortion to gender to Critical Race Theory.
The truck made several stops around Berkeley. (Photo/Courtesy Accuracy In Media)
Guillette, though, rejected the characterization “right wing” or even “conservative” to describe his group, saying AIM is a “freedom-oriented organization with staffers from a variety of ideologies and political parties.” It describes itself as being “on the forefront of the culture wars.”
A one-time political activist who launched the Florida chapter of Americans for Prosperity, Guillette has experience capturing media attention — he was formerly a vice president at Project Veritas, an influential and highly controversial right-wing organization known for surreptitiously recording and publishing interviews with liberal activists to generate negative publicity for progressive causes.
While AIM’s campaign garnered some approval on social media from those outraged at the Berkeley Law groups’ Zionist bans, it received pushback from a number of Jewish community members including leadership of the Berkeley campus Hillel.
Some said they were shocked and disturbed by the images of Hitler, or could not discern what their political angle was.
“Saw this bus on my morning run,” wrote Grace Stewart, a UC Berkeley student, on Instagram. “Very scary.”
The San Francisco office of the Anti-Defamation League decried the campaign in a tweet, even as it said it opposes efforts by Berkeley Law groups to ban Zionist speakers.
“The addition of more antisemitism, like using Hitler imagery to score cheap rhetoric points, only trivializes the memories of the six million,” the ADL wrote.
Berkeley Hillel released a statement offering support to students who had seen the images, saying staff were on hand to talk “24/7.”
“We know some of you may have seen a truck driving around campus this morning with a disturbing image prominently displayed,” the group wrote in an Instagram post. “Berkeley Hillel rejects antisemitism of any kind, and in all its forms. We also reject subjecting Jewish students to additional fear and trauma.”
“During the season of Sukkot, a time of joy and celebration, we are saddened that students are having to confront such ugly images,” the statement said.
The box truck campaign was just the beginning of a larger effort from Accuracy in Media, leadership said, to oppose antisemitism including with geo-targeted digital ads.
“This will be a long, long campaign,” Guillette said.
At Berkeley this week, in the midst of ongoing news and social media attention on the anti-Zionist bylaws (coverage that has exasperated the law school dean, a progressive Zionist himself), the AIM truck was but one of a few campaigns on campus to combat antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment.
On Thursday, the pro-Israel activist and actress Noa Tishby visited Sproul Plaza to speak with students, attracting some protests from pro-Palestinian students.
Also this week the Jewish-run nonprofit JewBelong, which combats antisemitism with cheeky billboards and viral messaging, parked one of its box trucks outside the Berkeley Hillel. Its box truck, which is bright pink, is part of a campaign launched in October targeting Bay Area universities and well-frequented sites with messages opposing antisemitism. It said: “We’re just 75 years since the gas chambers. So no, a billboard calling out Jew hate isn’t an overreaction.”
JewBelong had nothing to do with the AIM truck, co-founder Archie Gottesman said. “The truck scared the crap out of us,” she added.
Today, a palestinian Arab doctor was reportedly among those killed during a shootout between IDF troops and palestinian Arab terrorists in Jenin. Other reports have him as seriously injured.
Either way, the haters are already trying to paint him as a new Shireen Abu Aqleh, the victim of an Israeli “execution.” But like in the case of Shireen, we do not know for sure who shot him.
We do, however, know a number of things.
Palestinian Arab terrorists took cover behind an ambulance
Footage shows the terrorists using an ambulance for cover, the occupants acting as “human shields.”
Another video being shared on social media seems to show how while the ambulance was entering the alley to retrieve a terrorist’s body, there was no shooting from the bottom of the alley where our soldiers were standing. Only after the ambulance blocked the alley did shooting resume, seemingly from the terrorist side.
Palestinians are sharing an edited clip on social media The deceased doctor was a terrorist supporter and possible terrorist himself
The doctor killed was named as Dr Abdullah Abu Tin. Here is what he looked like at his day job:
He has also been pictured holding a weapon:
as well as with two armed children:
who are presumably his own kids:
No matter what, Israel will be blamed
If an investigation reveals Israel did shoot the doctor, albeit accidentally, we already know how it plays out.
If an investigation shows a terrorist bullet was the cause, the world media, so-called human rights organizations, and Israel-haters will be silent.
Updates:
14/11/22: According to the Jerusalem Post, Secretary of the Fatah Movement of Jenin Province told Quds News Agency that al Teen was killed while “fighting side by side” with the palestinian Arab terrorists.
14/11/22: A further indication he was a terrorist:
15/10/22: Arab media posts confirm he was a terrorist (hat tip: Uri):
Auto-translation: Equipment of the intertwined doctor Abdullah Abu al-Tin.
His gun lasted against the invaders and the approach of the resister lasted.
May God accept him from among the martyrs
Auto-translation: This is what the engaged commander, Doctor Abdullah Al-Ahmad Abu Tin, left and the location of the sniper’s bullet that hit him.