Doubling Australian aid to UNRWA: A VITAL PERSPECTIVE

Producer, 20 SHORT UNRWA DOCUMENTARIES – ALL SHOT ON LOCATION.
https://www.cfnepr.com/205640/Movies
The Australian government has announced that it will double to its aid to UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.
On Saturday evening. October 8, 2022, rioting took place in Shuafat. Following an attack on an Israel security vehicle, where a female Israel security officer was killed.
Shuafat hosts at least 30,000 descendants of Arab refugees who left their homes during the 1948 Arab Israel war. There is an UNRWA refugee camp located in Shuafat.
Here is a link to a movie which I produced and filmed in 2019 on location at the UNRWA
refugee camp in Jerusalem.

(*) https://israelbehindthenews.com/?s=shuafat
The UN created UNRWA as a “temporary” entity in the wake of the Israel War of
Independence, to help half a million Arabs displaced as a result of these hostilities.
Seventy-three years later, in texts taught in the UNRWA schools, Israel does not exist and is replaced by an entity known as “Palestine.”

Doubling Australian aid to UNRWA IN PERSPECTIVE 9.10.22

Rate of Illegal Arab Construction in Area C Increased by 80% in 2022

A report released by the Regavim Movement reveals that in 2022, illegal Palestinian Authority Arab construction in Area C, the portion of Judea and Samaria under full Israeli jurisdiction, increased by 80%. The report documents 5535 new illegal structures built in 2022, compared to 3076 structures in the same period in 2021. Regavim: “The Israeli government is creating a de facto Palestinian state.”

Illegal Arab construction in Area C of Judea & Samaria.

In 2022, illegal Arab construction in Area C of Judea and Samaria boomed, outpacing the already-alarming rate seen in 2021 by 80%. Regavim’s most recent report, based on data collected through meticulous fieldwork, aerial photography and GIS mapping, compared the situation on the ground in 2021 to that of 2022. The study covered the period of April 2021 through April 2022, analyzing the number of structures, the legal status of the land on which they were built and the jurisdictional lines dictated by international law.

Regavim’s exhaustive study indicates that in comparison to previous years, the data for the most recent period are unprecedented, both in quality and quantity. The structures in built in recent months are not temporary shacks or makeshift shelters that characterized much of the illegal activity in earlier years; in 2022, new Palestinian construction is characterized by “palatial residences, sprawling holiday resorts, amusement and entertainment compounds and event halls, swimming pools and vacation villages, and high-rise residential and commercial towers.” In addition to the mass-scale construction, in many areas development and infrastructure work was carried out to lay the groundwork for future full-scale neighborhoods, such as at Khirbet Khattha near Tarkumiyeh and Lakef near Karnei Shomron.

Regavim studied construction patterns exclusively in Area C, the portion of Judea and Samaria placed under full Israeli jurisdiction in the Oslo Accords framework. At present, according to Regavim’s research, there are 81,317 illegal Arab-built structures in this area, covering an area of approximately 150,000 dunams – twice the total area of Jewish settlement in Judea and Samaria all told, legal and illegal.

Illegal Jewish construction stands at 4,382 structures, of which 406 new structures were built in the time period of the new study. Although the disparity in number is striking, it is far overshadowed by the disparity in quality: Whereas illegal Arab-built structures are located in desolate, remote areas far from existing villages or settlement clusters, all of the illegal construction in the Jewish sector is located within the municipal “blue line” boundaries of Jewish settlements.

Illegal Arab vs. Jewish construction.

Analysis of the hard data reveals several additional important facts: Aerial photos show that in Areas A and B – the sections of Judea and Samaria placed under full Palestinian Authority civil jurisdiction under the Oslo framework, there are abundant empty spaces that remain undeveloped and completely un-utilized.

Rather than developing in Area A, Arab construction has continued to seep into the open spaces of Area C. Additionally, these same aerial photos leave no room for doubt: Arab construction is neither random nor haphazard. Construction is strategically placed, in accordance with the Fayyad Plan, according to pre-established criteria and objectives: Creating contiguous Arab settlement – a pattern that is particularly pronounced in northern Samaria; isolation and strangulation of Jewish communities; construction on the route of planned traffic arteries such as the Funduk Bypass Road and the Tekoa – Ibei HaNachal Access Road in eastern Gush Etzion; construction alongside existing highways, including Route 55 and Route 60, the main roads of Samaria and Judea respectively.

“The Israeli government is creating a de facto Palestinian state,” says Meir Deutsch, Director General of Regavim. “Over the years we have documented the illegal construction on a daily basis and sounded the alarm about the Palestinian annexation of Judea and Samaria, but the most recent construction data are clear and unequivocal: Under the present government there has been a meteoric rise in the extent of illegal construction and the Palestinian takeover of land. This is not a warning light – it’s a wailing, deafening siren. Before our eyes, a Palestinian state is taking shape – and it is already posing an existential threat to the future of the State of Israel. The data indicate that the present government did not merely turn a blind eye to this phenomenon; this a clear and conscious policy, reflected in recent statements by Interim Prime Minister Yair Lapid regarding the creation of a Palestinian state.”

Recently, Minister of Defense Benny Gantz announced: “We are enforcing the law against illegal construction in area C – on both sides, both Jewish and Arab, and I am proud of it.”

The data revealed by Regavim indicate that Gantz’s statement should be cause for concern “primarily because it exposes the Minster of Defense’s complete failure to grasp the impact and inevitable outcome of failure to protect the territory under Israel’s jurisdiction,” said Deutsch. “No less cause for concern is the failure of so many of our elected officials and political hopefuls, as well as a very large segment of the Israeli public, to grasp the danger posed by Benny Gantz to the security of the State of Israel.”

A nechtiker tog

This exquisite Yiddish expression loosely translated means “whom are you trying to fool?”

After two thousand years of being abused, kicked around, targeted, slandered and accused of a myriad array of theological and political crimes, one would think that those dark days were well and truly a relic of the past.

The original Zionist vision of a world purged of its Jewish phobias and replaced with a love for the return of Jews to their ancestral homeland is, unfortunately, still a dream. We may will it but it won’t become a reality in a hurry, if at all.

We are in a much better condition these days to combat Judeophobia articulated and enacted by those whose hostility is openly and unabashedly displayed. The real and major challenge, however, revolves around those individuals and nations which profess to “love” us but, in actual fact, are working assiduously to undermine us both as a nation-state and as members of the world’s original monotheistic faith.

I wish that all our detractors, Jewish and non-Jewish, would listen to the words of the Hebrew prophet Jeremiah, which we read on the second day of Rosh Hashanah.

“You will be rebuilt. You will yet plant vineyards in the mountains of Samaria. The planters will plant and redeem. Behold, I will bring them from the northern land and gather them from the ends of the earth. Among them will be the blind, the lame, pregnant and birthing mothers together. A great congregation will return here. Hear the word of the Lord oh nations and relate it in distant islands (NZ?): He shall gather them in and guard them as a shepherd guards his flock.”

As I looked around our local minyan, the words of Jeremiah resonated loud and clear. Here was truly an ingathering of exiles from distant lands. From New Zealand and Australia, Canada and the USA, the UK, Sweden and Russia and most interesting of all from Brazil, where generations after the inquisition sought to extinguish any vestige of Judaism increasing numbers are returning to the faith of their ancestors. As the entire assembled multitude, including native born Israelis whose families several generations back escaped from the horrors of Europe, listened to the Prophet’s words one could not escape the miraculous fact that here we are settled in the very places our Patriarchs and Matriarchs lived.

Switching on the media after the Chag hurled us straight back into the surreal and bizarre reality of most of the rest of the world convulsing over the fact that Jews were defending themselves against terror.

From the White House, State Department and the US Ambassador to Israel (he who refuses to visit the very places Jeremiah talks about) came a stream of crocodile tears over terrorists eliminated either before or after murdering Israelis. Nides (the ambassador) condemned the heinous crime of “settlement growth.” Obviously he is deliberately oblivious to our ancient and legal claim to this land and prefers as so many Jewish genetic Democrats do, to believe that if only we would fold up our tents and surrender to the falsifiers of history, all will be well in the world.

Our touted “best friends” feel sufficiently emboldened to interfere in a most blatant manner in how we govern Israel. “Leaks” from “well informed” US Government sources and expressions of horror from Democratic members of Congress and the Senate, warned Israeli politicians against including members of a right-wing nationalist party in any future coalition. The unmitigated gall behind this gross and blatant interference in Israel’s electoral process demonstrates yet again the double standards prevailing in Washington.

Any Israeli political party or aspiring Knesset member failing to meet the democratic standards set by the Supreme Court is banned from taking part in the elections. One may not like the politics of a particular party or the views of a candidate but at the end of the day it is up to the Israeli electorate to decide in free and fair balloting. The fact that, no doubt after a series of “wink, wink, nudge, nudge” gestures behind the scenes, American officials feel emboldened to demand who should be or not be included in our next coalition speaks volumes about actual “friendship.”

At the same time our local self proclaimed liberals and defenders of their version of democracy are up in arms because anyone who does not conform to their leftist dogma must be by default a “fascist” and therefore beyond the pale.

Just imagine the uproar if Israeli politicians demanded that AOC and her squad plus all the “progressives” who obsess about Israel be banned from the US political process. Yet these same individuals feel no shame and compunction in interfering in our domestic affairs.

Whom are they trying to fool with their false and hypocritical, hysterical posturing?

There are two leading contenders for the “nechtiker tog” award of the year.

The first is the new and beleaguered Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Liz Truss. Whether her economic policies will fatally wreck the country’s finances or create an economic miracle remains to be seen. The polls don’t look good but then anything could happen between now and when elections are due in 2024.

Prior to her elevation to Downing Street and in an effort to round up the Jewish vote she declared that if chosen she would investigate the possibility of moving the UK Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. She reiterated this pledge again when she subsequently met Israel’s PM.

Anyone with even only a smattering of previous and current British policies towards Israel knows that Truss’s declarations are just hot air. Trump may have been successful in squashing the anti-Israel State Dept but Truss has no show whatsoever of doing the same with the Foreign Office whose track record since Balfour and San Remo has been consistently hostile. Already the howls of outrage have emanated forth from Arab nations, Islamic spokespersons, Corbyn groupies and of course media outlets such as the Guardian.

As usual, gullible UK Jewish and Israeli “machers” were quick to applaud Liz Truss. The fact that not one of them managed to decipher the real meaning behind the word “investigate” and instead cheered a non-existent event speaks volumes.

The second contender for the “nechtiker tog” award must surely go to the wackiest “peace” plan ever promoted in recent times if not ever.

At first glance I thought the Hashemite Kingdom of Palestine was a new spoof from John Cleese and Fawlty Towers or a new episode of the Life of Brian. Instead, it turns out that a Saudi author and commentator has discovered a solution to the seemingly unsolvable problem of Israel’s place in the Middle East.

He suggests that Jordan merge with Gaza and part of Judea and Samaria in order to create this weird creature called the Hashemite Kingdom of Palestine.

The proponents of this plan are frustrated that neither Israelis nor the Hashemites let alone the Ramallah and Gaza based Palestinian Arabs have embraced his vision of peace on earth and goodwill to all. The reasons are very simple and as those concerned still cannot understand the refusal to embrace it I will try to clarify.

  • This is not an official Saudi offer. The Saudi authorities have been strikingly silent.
  • The Hashemite Monarch is hardly likely to commit hari kari by dissolving his country and getting into bed with the likes of the PLO and Hamas.
  • Israelis have no intention of handing large parts of Judea and Samaria over to a terror sponsoring entity, no matter what exotic name it adopts.
  • Joining the terror territory of Gaza with Israeli sovereign territory is an exercise in lunacy.
  • Can anyone in their right mind imagine that the Palestinian Arabs, having been brainwashed for generations, will willingly renounce their intention to destroy the Jewish State and settle for Amman as their Capital?
  • As reported by PMW, Abbas has described the creation of Israel as “a disgrace to humanity.”

These are just a few of the fatal flaws which doom this plan from ever being implemented. Like others of its ilk, peddled by the UN and a pathetically inept American Administration, if implemented the intended cure would prove fatal as far as Israeli Jews are concerned.

What the promoters of such schemes still fail to internalize is the fundamental fact that it is the refusal to acknowledge any legitimate Jewish presence in this Land by Islamic extremists which is the sole core of the problem. Unlike some of the Gulf States the current Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the PLO/Hamas/Hezbollah terrorists only envisage a land ethnically cleansed of Jews.

The ever expanding numbers of “refugees” in UNRWA camps where they are brainwashed to believe in a Judenrein Palestine constitute yet another challenge. Unfortunately, thanks to increased funding by nations such as New Zealand and Australia, UNRWA will continue to contribute to the absence of any sort of peace.

Unless and until all these realities are tackled and dealt with our response to hallucinatory mirages must be “a nechtiker tog.”

Coalition for unrwa education policy change

View of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) building during a strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 26, 2018. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** אונר"א
עזה
בניין
שביתה

The time has come to launch a coalition for Unrwa Education Policy Change, with initiators from Israel, Germany, Sweden, the UK, Canada, US and Australia, all major funders of UNRWAthe United Nations Relief and Works Agency, launched as a temporary agency for refugees from the 1948 war. Their descendants have been there ever since.
Let us ask citizens in each of these prominent UNRWA donor nations to ameliorate the current UNRWA school system, which now defies the values of the United Nations.

The first Unrwa Education Policy Change conference will convene, following November elections, in the US and in Israel.

Let us raise funds to provide an alternative to the current direction of UNRWA education, which does not allow any child to see past the illusion of the “right of return”

The coalition for Unrwa Education Policy Change has one purpose in mind: to transform UNRWA schools into an oasis of peace and reconciliation, so that a future of dignity can be advanced for the next generation of UNRWA young people to see beyond the squalor of 59 “temporary” refugee camps, where their families have dwelled with no hope and no future for over 70 years.

The coalition for Unrwa Education Policy Change will provide a practial vision of peace and reconciliation for the 6.7 million descendants of the 1948 war which they have never seen.

Injustices at Berkeley

From Boston to Los Angeles, what started as a trickle of outrage has cascaded into huge marches in the streets in solidarity with the long-suffering Iranian people after the Ayatollah Khamenei regime’s torture and brutal murder of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman, for failing to fully cover her hair.
You would expect that such an outrageous crime against humanity would bring to the front lines women’s rights leader Linda Sarsour, and US Congresswomen Omar, Tlaib, and AOC. Nothing. Crickets.

You would hope that the nearly three weeks of protests by Iranian trade union members and university students, some of whom have been arrested, maimed, or killed, would kindle mass acts of solidarity. That the rising death toll and mounting arrests would inspire demands that members of faculties at major US universities – including Princeton and Oberlin – who’ve defended the Holocaust-denying ayatollah and his regime’s horrific crushing of the human rights of their own people, be removed from their seats in America’s “Ivory Tower of Academia.”

And how about the elites at the University of California, Berkeley? Back in the roiling 1960s, Berkeley students practically invented sit-ins and student strikes – demanding an end to any and all censorship and full freedom of speech on campus.

And today? Are they working to galvanize a nation to stand for the oppressed in Iran? In Ukraine? In China? In North Korea? In Cuba? In Nicaragua? Have they shown solidarity with the estimated 80% of the world’s believers who are discriminated against because of their faiths?

Perhaps there are some voices on campus trying to do their share to speak out for the truly oppressed. But if they exist, they’re drowned out by the Berkeley University Law School elite who are uniting to condemn, demonize and silence the most dangerous people on the planet – Zionists, and to in effect create “Jew-free” zones to protect the righteous zip code from such poison.

In a campaign worthy of Soviet universities in the heyday of Stalin’s Russia, or Mao’s China, or Ayatollah Khamenei’s Iran, nine different law student groups at the University of California, Berkeley’s School of Law, launched this new academic year by amending their bylaws to ensure that they will never invite any speakers that support Israel or Zionism. They include a who’s who of our nation’s future legal elite: Women of Berkeley Law, Asian Pacific American Law Students Association, Middle Eastern and North African Law Students Association, Law Students of African Descent, and the Queer Caucus.

Please spare us the phony argument that this is merely an anti-Zionist, not anti-Semitic, exercise. Today, the world’s largest Jewish community, nearly 7 million Jews, resides in Israel, fulfilling 2,000 years of yearning and prayer by Jews the world over to return to Zion, the land of Israel. The overwhelming majority of Jews in the Diaspora support Israel in word and deed.

None of this means that Israel or any other state deserves a moral blank check for everything they do. No nation does. But in 2022 we are witnessing an assault not on Israeli policies but on the very legitimacy of a sovereign Jewish state. Israel, and Israel alone, is slandered as an apartheid state, a colonialist afterthought, a Nazi-like occupier, a harvester of Palestinian organs, a serial murderer of children. All lies. Yet all these cancers spread through our campuses, poisoning attitudes toward Jews.

Then, if Israelis are Nazis, what should you do when threatened by Nazis? You kill them. So that’s not terrorism, that’s heroism, acts by innocent Palestinians yearning to be free.

How to react to Israel’s Zionist supporters? You boycott them, you threaten their synagogues, schools, and leaders with online maps listing names and addresses on social media; you create hostile environments so that many Jews begin to hide their Stars of David and remove their kippahs in public. Against this backdrop, the continuing surge of anti-Semitic acts continues to plague cities with large Jewish populations, including the biggest one of all – New York City.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center is urging the UC Regents and California Gov. Gavin Newsom to take action, to withhold any state funding from law school-linked student associations. We urge UC Berkeley to call out law students who are seeking to destroy freedom of speech and to institute Stalin-like censorship.

But more must be done and not only at Berkeley.

Our institution’s namesake, Simon Wiesenthal, a Jewish architect who lost 89 members of his family in the Nazi Holocaust and went on to become the famed Nazi hunter, told us that the Holocaust taught him that Jews alone will never defeat antisemitism. We need friends and new allies to act against history’s oldest hate, Wiesenthal said.

Now is the time we Jews need our neighbors, university alumni, philanthropic donors, elected officials, and social influencers from New York to Illinois to California to take on the latest pernicious variant of this deadly virus.

Remember, too, that history has shown time and again that it begins with the Jews, it never ends with the Jews.

Rabbi Marvin Hier is the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s founder, CEO and a two-time Academy Award-winner. Rabbi Abraham Cooper is the center’s associate dean and global social action director.

This is the report of an intelligence officer with decades of experience in the Russian world and deep insights into the Soviet mindset.

Premise

1. Putin is a ruthless KGB officer. No less ruthless than Stalin and Hitler.
2. Putin firmly holds that the Russian nation, with its values, culture and orthodox religion constitutes the last bastion of Christendom against moral corruption and death.
3. Corruption and moral death in his worldview are embodied by profiteering, cosmopolitanism, individualism, hedonism and sexual immorality.
4. The global centers of this decadence are Hollywood, Las Vegas and Wall Street.

Corollary

Due to the premises listed above Putin is a latent anti-Semite. So far his antisemitism has been kept in check by the following factors:

1. Jews are an economic, cultural and PR blessing for every land they reside in. Putin, as a history buff, understands this well.
2. Putin knows that the Jewish people and the Russian people both suffered terribly under a common enemy: Nazism.
3. Whatever misgivings Putin may have always felt about Jewish political liberalism, cultural avantgardism and cosmopolitanism, he has felt it wiser to hug Russian Jews in order to be on friendly terms with them and their “international networks”.

Anti-Corollary

Putin now feels betrayed by Jews around him and by the Jewish world as a whole:

1. Few Russian Jewish personalities have supported his military campaign against Ukraine.
2. Russian Jews have been disproportionately hostile to the military campaign against Kyiv.
3. Russian Jewish emigration has by far exceeded that of other ethnic communities in the Russian Federation. This threatens Putin with a brain drain and is viewed by him as a personal “Dolchstoss”.
4. Many visible leaders of resistance to Putin’s plans are Jewish: Zelensky, Blinken, the famous artist Pugacheva who has recently fled to Israel with her husband and countless oligarchs and influential bloggers and intellectuals.

Consequences

Putin has started talking a threatening language towards the Jewish people:

1. He has curbed the activities of the Jewish Agency.
2. He has publicly demanded more “patriotism” and “commitment” from Russian Jews.
3. He has invoked Satan in his speeches. From a Christian metaphysical viewpoint, there is nothing closer to Satan than those whom Christian orthodox tradition blames of having murdered the Lord.

Warning

Putin, if pushed too much into a corner, could be tempted to strike the Jewish state. Why?

1. Since Israel is not a NATO-member this would not invite immediate retaliation against Russia.
2. The Arab and Muslim world, together with scores of antisemites all over the globe, would celebrate this assault and view Russia and Putin as redeemers.
3. Zelensky would be caught in the crucible of fighting and/or negotiating as a Ukrainian or as a Jew. An impossible dilemma! Anthony Blinken will blink too.

Solution

1. Israel must preserve its neutrality between Russia and Ukraine at all costs.
2. Israel should on Twitter ask Zelensky to seek a fair peace and remember that he is no Conan the Barbarian or Rambo. The message of this quip will be clear.
3. In exchange for Russian diplomatic and economic pressure on Iran, Israel should quietly allow Azerbaijan to deliver drones to Russia.

The former strategy will have these advantages:

1. Israel will demonstrate to the non-hawkish Biden administration and to the dovish German government that it does not want Zelensky to push Putin into a corner and possibly unleash a nuclear war.
2. Israel will demonstrate to Putin that Jews do not by default support other Jews, as Zelensky assumed when he addressed the Knesset and as so do too many non-Jews.
3. If push comes to shove, Israel can argue to Russian emissaries that Zelensky, with his Gentile wife and baptized children, is a terrible Jewish hero that the Jewish State wishes to cut to size.
4. Azerbaijan will exhaust its drone reserves and Israel will assure America and France on the side that it will not replenish these stocks in order for Armenia to be less vulnerable to another Azerbaijani assault.
5. Pressured also by Russia and under intense domestic turmoil, Iran will submit to the conditions demanded by the international community for the neutralization of its nuclear goals.
6. Russia will hold its ground militarily and the resulting stalemate will lead to a negotiated peace agreement that will have no clear winners, but one clear loser: Putin and his clique.

These outcomes are far superior than humiliating Russia and causing a social and political collapse in the Russian Federation akin to that of Germany in 1918 or that of Iraq after its liberation. Nuclear powers cannot be pushed to implode for the sake of the world as a whole.

For further clarification of these issues, feel free to reply to this message

Babi Yar: Erev Yom Kippur September 1941

On September 29-30, 1941, the eve of Yom Kippur, the Germans murdered 33,771 Jewish men, women and children in Babi Yar, almost four miles from the center of Kiev, the capital of the Soviet Ukrainian Republic. Although Babi Yar was “not the largest Holocaust era mass-murder site on Soviet soil,” it was significant for two reasons, historian Shay Pilnik explains. Kiev, with a Jewish population of 160,000, was “the hub for Jewish culture,” and the first European capital to become Judenrein (free of Jews) during the Holocaust.

Pilnik quotes historian Lucy Dawidowicz, who remarked that the “unprecedented” pace of the killings, which occurred within 36 hours, is the second reason for Babi Yar’s importance. The numbers established “a record in the annals of mass murder,” she said. At Auschwitz-Birkenau, the total capacity of the four gas chambers and crematoria was a maximum of 6,0000 a day at its peak.

Another justification for Babi Yar’s uniqueness Shay said, was that although the site “was not the largest killing field during World War II in the Soviet Union, the approximate number of 100,000 dead in Babi Yar, the overwhelming majority of whom were Jewish, helped establish Babi Yar’s position as the centerpiece of the Holocaust in the USSR.”

Arrival in Kiev

On September 19, 1941 German troops entered Kiev, Dawidowicz noted. They were accompanied by Sonderkommando (special commando) 4a, an advance group of Einsatzgruppe C that had been assigned to Ukraine. By September 25, the entire Einsatzgruppe C had arrived in Kiev. Before the Soviet troops escaped from the capital, they placed delayed time explosives in downtown Kiev. On September 24, the bombs began exploding, engulfing the entire city center in flames. Many buildings were completely gutted and destroyed, with people having to be evacuated. Approximately 25,000 were left homeless.

An Excuse to Murder Jews

The Germans seized the opportunity to accuse the Jews of Kiev of planting the bombs. “Judaism in the East,” Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the Reich Security Main Office [RSHA], advised them, “is the source of Bolshevism and must therefore be wiped out in accordance with the Fuhrer’s aims.” After a meeting with Emil Otto Rasch, Einsatzgruppe A Commander, Sonderkommando commanding officer Paul Blobel had explosives placed under the Dormition Cathedral at the Pechersk Monastery, which destroyed a significant portion of the nearly 900-year-old building, according to historian Richard Breitman.

Blobel then had placards printed instructing all Jews of Kiev to meet on September 29 at 8 a.m. near the Jewish and Russian cemeteries. The notices were distributed throughout the city by the recently recruited Ukrainian militia, Dawidowicz said. She also noted that many people in Ukraine and in other areas of the Soviet Union hailed the German invaders, with some having actively “collaborated in the wholesale slaughter.”

Jews were ordered to bring “documents, money, valuables and also warm clothing, underwear, etc.,” Dawidowicz added. They were told that those who defied the directive would be shot. Like the Jews in other areas of the Soviet Union, the Jews in Kiev had little or no knowledge about the antisemitic designs of the Third Reich. A German intelligence officer observed how Russian Jews were “shockingly ill-informed about our attitude toward them.” Practically everyone assumed they would be “resettled,” since they were to gather near a railroad siding. Some believed the rumors that Germans were sending them to Palestine.

As uninformed as the Jews were about the German ultimate objectives, they began their hopeless march with a sense of uncertainty and apprehension, Dawidowicz said. Some Ukrainians offered to assist their friends, although most watched “with indifference.”

The Procession to Babi Yar

On September 29, Breitman said, more than 30,000 Jews appeared as directed, in spite of the cold weather. The streets leading to the ravine in the northwest part of Kiev were blocked as the Jews were being led to their death. As their food and possessions were being confiscated and placed on mounds, the Jews began to be frightened; panic ensued. “The lines,” Dawidowicz said, “seemed to stop moving, and people were crushed together, exhausted, terrified. The children were crying. Disorder, despair, nightmare.”

Describing the horrifying scene afterwards she said: “Then the Germans began shoving the Jews into new narrower lines. They moved very slowly. After a long walk, they came to a passageway formed by German soldiers with truncheons and police dogs. The Jews were whipped through. The dogs went at those who fell. But the pressure of the surging lines behind was irresistible, and the weak and the injured were trod underfoot. Bruised and bloodied, numbed by the incomprehensibility of their fate, the Jews emerged onto a grassy clearing. They had arrived at Babi Yar; ahead of them lay the ravine. The ground was strewn with clothing. Ukrainian militiamen, supervised by Germans, ordered the Jews to undress. Those who balked, who resisted, were assaulted, their clothes ripped off. Naked bleeding people were everywhere. Screams and hysterical laughter filled the air. Some people’s hair turned gray on the spot. Others went mad in moments.”

The Jews were then led to a narrow ledge near the ravines. Obscured from view, the Germans arranged machine guns so that when the ledge held as many Jews as it could accommodate, they opened fire. Dawidowicz noted, “The bodies toppled into the ravine, piling up layer upon layer. Where once a clear stream flowed, now blood ran.”

The executions lasted for an hour at a time, before the men were relieved, and another group took over. At certain points, the Germans and Ukrainian militiamen went down to the ravine, “trampling over the bodies” to make sure the Jews were dead, pushing them down to allow more to be buried, and then covering the bodies with sand from the quarry.

A Final Note

Murders continued at Babi Yar for a number of months, Dawidowicz said, but never to the extent as on September 29-30, when 33,771 Jews were slaughtered, simply because they were Jews. “Mass murder transforms … the physical environment” observed historian Wendy Lower. “What were rolling hills and sylvan glades in Ukraine became rough craters, death mounds and scorched patches.” There were also ravines like Babi Yar, which were packed with bodies and lime chloride, then sealed by dynamite.

These sites were not in remote areas, Lower points out. Very often, they “encroached on shortcuts and paths that connected towns.” They were locations of interest and of plundering. German men and women used the “meadows for picnics, the forests for hunting, and the swimming holes for cooling off and sunbathing.”

Dawidowicz concluded that “inside the Soviet Union … Babi Yar has come to represent more than the site of a Nazi massacre, one among dozens. It speaks as well to a whole range of Jewish experience in Russia, an often harsh and sometimes bloodstained history that reaches back to pogroms under the czars and on to the arrests and virulent propaganda attacks” in the former Soviet Union.

Dr. Alex Grobman is the senior resident scholar at the John C. Danforth Society, a member of the Council of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, and on the advisory board of The National Christian Leadership Conference of Israel (NCLCI). He lives in Jerusalem.

I’ve Studied 13 Days of the Cuban Missile Crisis. This Is What I See When I Look at Putin.

Mr. Dobbs is a former foreign correspondent who covered the collapse of communism and the author of “One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War.”

Two nuclear-armed states on a collision course with no obvious exit ramp. An erratic Russian leader using apocalyptic language — “if you want us to all meet in hell, it’s up to you.” Showdowns at the United Nations, with each side accusing the other of essentially gambling with Armageddon.

For six decades, the Cuban missile crisis has been viewed as the defining confrontation of the modern age, the world’s closest brush with nuclear annihilation. The war in Ukraine presents perils of at least equal magnitude, particularly now that Vladimir Putin has backed himself into a corner by declaring large chunks of neighboring Ukraine as belonging to Russia “forever.”

As two countries proceed up an escalatory ladder, mistakes become increasingly likely — as the Cuban missile crisis made clear. In a conventional war, it is possible for political leaders to make significant mistakes and for the human race to survive, battered but intact. In a nuclear standoff, even a minor misunderstanding or miscommunication can have catastrophic consequences.

In October 1962, it was President John Kennedy who declared a naval blockade, or quarantine, of Cuba to prevent reinforcement of the Soviet military position on the island. This put the onus on his Kremlin counterpart, Nikita Khrushchev, to either accept the clearly signaled American condition for ending the crisis (a full withdrawal of Soviet missiles from Cuba) or risk nuclear war.

This time, the roles are reversed: Mr. Putin is seeking to enforce a red line by insisting he will use “all available means,” including his nuclear arsenal, to defend the newly, unilaterally expanded borders of Mother Russia. President Biden has promised to support Ukraine’s attempts to defend itself. It is unclear how Mr. Putin will react to his red line being ignored.

Even if we assume Mr. Putin is a rational actor who wishes to avoid nuclear annihilation, that is not necessarily reassuring. Contrary to popular belief, the biggest danger of nuclear war in October 1962 did not arise from the so-called eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation between Khrushchev and Kennedy but from their inability to control events that they themselves had set in motion.

As I discovered when I assembled a minute-by-minute chronology of the most dangerous phase of the crisis, there were times when both leaders were unaware of developments on the battlefield that assumed a logic and momentum of their own.

Khrushchev never authorized the shooting down of an American U-2 spy plane over Cuba by a Soviet missile on Oct. 27, 1962, the most dangerous day of the crisis. Kennedy was unaware that another U-2 strayed over Russian airspace the same day, triggering Soviet air defenses. “There’s always some sonofabitch that doesn’t get the word,” was how he put it later.

While the war in Ukraine is obviously different from the Cuban missile crisis, it is not hard to imagine comparable failures and miscalculations. A stray shell from either side could cause an accident at a nuclear power plant, spewing radioactive fallout over much of Europe. A bungled attempt by Russia to interdict Western military supplies to Ukraine could spill over into NATO countries like Poland, triggering an automatic U.S. response. A Russian decision to use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukrainian troop formations could escalate into a full-blown nuclear exchange with the United States.

While the U.S. intelligence community has chalked up some impressive successes in Ukraine, most notably its accurate prediction of Russia’s invasion, which occurred on Feb. 24, the 1962 crisis should serve as a reminder of the limits of intelligence gathering. Kennedy was belatedly informed about the deployment of medium-range Soviet missiles to Cuba, but was left in the dark about other equally important matters. He was unaware, for example, of the presence of nearly 100 Soviet tactical nuclear missiles in Cuba targeted on the Guantánamo naval base and a potential American invading force. The C.I.A. underestimated Soviet troop strength on the island and was unable to track the movement of any of the nuclear warheads.

What both Kennedy and Khrushchev did possess was an intuitive understanding of the peril confronting not just their own countries but the entire world if the crisis was allowed to escalate. That is why they maintained a back channel to communicate with each other privately (through the president’s brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, and the Soviet ambassador to Washington, Anatoly Dobrynin) even as they denounced each other publicly. It is also why they acted swiftly to reach a compromise deal (kept secret for decades) that involved the dismantling of U.S. medium-range missiles in Turkey in exchange for a Soviet nuclear withdrawal from Cuba.

Like Kennedy, Khrushchev had experienced the horror of World War II. He knew that nuclear war would be many times more destructive. Kremlin archives show that for all his bloodcurdling rhetoric, Khrushchev was determined to find a peaceful solution as soon as it became clear that his nuclear gamble had failed. Mr. Putin, by contrast, has chosen to raise the stakes at every critical point. Escalation has become his preferred tactic.

All this is taking place against the background of a communications revolution that has sped up the pace of warfare and diplomacy, resolving some of the technological challenges faced by Kennedy and Khrushchev but creating new ones in their place. It no longer takes 12 hours to transmit a coded telegram from Washington to Moscow. These days, news travels from the battlefield almost instantaneously, putting pressure on political leaders to make hasty decisions. A U.S. president no longer has the luxury that Kennedy enjoyed in October 1962 of taking six days to consider his response to the discovery of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba.

We have not begun to approach the nuclear alert levels that characterized the Cuban missile crisis. While Mr. Putin has talked about putting his nuclear forces on heightened alert, there appears to be no confirmation of unusual movements in that direction. The most dangerous phase of the Cuban missile crisis lasted just 13 days; we are already in the eighth month of the war in Ukraine, with no end in sight. The longer it drags on, the greater the threat of some terrible miscalculation.

Michael Dobbs is a former foreign correspondent who covered the collapse of communism and is the author of “One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on FacebookTwitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Kfar Duma Arson Case

Since the July 2015 arson attack on the Dawabsheh family’s house Kfar Duma, Honenu has assisted many Jews accused of involvement with the crime. To familiarize our readers with the case, Honenu has gathered – click here – various articles and short videos on the subject. For a selection of cases in which Honenu Attorneys represented defendants and GSS interrogatees, see the links below

September 22, 2022: Honenu to Chief Rabbis: Help Ben Uliel pray with a minyan

September 11, 2022: Honenu: Allow Ben Uliel his religious rights on the High Holidays

September 1, 2022: Attorney Feldman: Supreme Court ruling authorizes confession by torture

September 1, 2022: Supreme Court rejects Ben Uliel appeal

August 31, 2022: Tomorrow: Supreme Court decision on Ben Uliel appeal

August 18, 2022: Against regulations, Ben Uliel not allowed to hug his daughter at visit

July 4, 2022: “Welcome to your GSS interrogation” – A detainee breaks his silence

March 31, 2022: Ben Uliel still held under severe conditions

March 8, 2022: Rabbinical establishment demands fair trial for Ben Uliel

March 7, 2022: First Supreme Court hearing held on Ben Uliel’s appeal

March 7, 2022: Protest for Ben Uliel: “Torture Leads To Lies!”

March 6, 2022: Six house-torchings in one year: What actually happened in Kfar Duma?

March 6, 2022: The car that was or wasn’t

March 6, 2022: The reenactment – Where is the missing recording?

Screenshot, Malchut Ben Uliel; Courtesy of the family

March 6, 2022: The cement pillars that Ben Uliel did not remember

March 6, 2022: The matter of “concealed information”

March 6, 2022: The black car, selective validation of testimony

March 6, 2022: The GSS admitted that the Kfar Duma murder has not been completely solved

March 6, 2022: Ben Uliel’s daughter: “It’s very hard for me. Please come to the protest.”

March 1, 2022: Duma case: New video demonstrates GSS torture method

September 1, 2021: “Wedding of Hate” defendants exonerated

August 17, 2021: Supreme Court ordered DA’s office to present confidential material

July 27, 2021: Honenu – Podcast listings

July 27, 2021: Episode 4 of Honenu’s podcast: Duma case, Part 4

July 15, 2021: Court rejects Duma case minor’s appeal

July 7, 2021: Episode 3 of Honenu’s podcast: Duma case, Part 3

June 30, 2021: Episode 2 of Honenu’s podcast: Duma case, Part 2

June 27, 2021: Ben Uliel’s attorneys request investigative material – Appeals stage

June 22, 2021: Honenu launches podcast

April 28, 2021: Defense might request retrial for Duma case minor

April 19, 2021: Ya’alon to testify for the defense in “Wedding of Hate” trial

March 15, 2021: Ben Uliel’s attorneys request gag order cancellation

March 11, 2021: Gag order on appeal by Ben Uliel

March 8, 2021: Ben Uliel’s attorneys request investigative material

December 21, 2020: Minor in Duma case: “I want to return to normal life”

October 29, 2020: Defense team being formed for Ben Uliel’s appeal

September 27, 2020: Will Ben Uliel pray in a minyan on Yom Kippur?

September 17, 2020: Rabbi Levanon: Ben Uliel not guilty

September 16, 2020: 42 months’ imprisonment for minor in Duma case

September 14, 2020: Rabbis support campaign to fund Ben Uliel’s Supreme Court appeal

September 7, 2020: Ben Uliel’s conviction left standing

September 7, 2020: Orian Ben Uliel sent letter to Central District Court

August 6, 2020: New evidence in Kfar Duma case

June 11, 2020: Progress in “Wedding of Hate” case

June 9, 2020: Joint List members cause disturbance at Duma trial

May 18, 2020: “You have imprisoned an innocent man!”

May 17, 2020: Verdict to be handed down for Ben Uliel

May 12, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 4

May 3, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 3

April 23, 2020: Verdict postponed in Kfar Duma case

April 23, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 2

April 16, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 1

March 19, 2020: Ben Uliel not allowed contact with family

March 3, 2020: Many irregularities in Kfar Duma case

February 29, 2020: Bill of indictment contradicts eye witnesses

February 27, 2020: Court canceled Ben Uliel’s petition

February 25, 2020: Ben Uliel to be transferred to Eshel Prison

October 24, 2019: Kfar Duma trial: Verdict handed down to minor

October 23, 2019: Kfar Duma trial: Verdict for GSS tortured minor

October 8, 2019: Request: Allow prisoners minyan on Yom Kippur

August 11, 2019: Kfar Duma case: DA’s office rejects District Court’s opinion

July 24, 2019: Expert opinion: Kfar Duma graffiti not by Ben Uliel

June 26, 2019: Kfar Duma trial, defense phase

May 16, 2019: Kfar Duma resident speaks to PI

May 12, 2019: Plea bargain disconnects minor from Duma case

April 30, 2019: More evidence lost in ‘Wedding of Hate’ case

April 6, 2019: Duma case survey: GSS version not reliable

December 21, 2018: Former GSS Deputy Director on false confessions

December 12, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: Evidence from scene incompatible with confessions

December 9, 2018: GSS agent to testify in Kfar Duma trial

December 3, 2018: “Duma Blood Libel” Facebook page administrators to distribute booklet

November 16, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: Ben Uliel’s alibi not investigated

October 28, 2018: Call to reexamine Kfar Duma case

October 22, 2018: Evidence lost in ‘Wedding of Hate’ trial

October 14, 2018: Kfar Duma trial to be held in open courtroom

September 6, 2018: GSS testimonies in Kfar Duma trial to remain under immunity

September 6, 2018: Will GSS agents’ testimonies of torture be revealed?

September 5, 2018: The Kfar Duma trial continues

July 15, 2018: Honenu director Meidad: “Release Ben Uliel!”

July 15, 2018: Supreme Court releases minor in Kfar Duma case

July 13, 2018: AG’s office appeals decision in Kfar Duma case

July 12, 2018: Deliberation on minor in Kfar Duma case

July 12, 2018: Kfar Duma case: Deliberation expected to be held shortly

July 11, 2018: Deliberation to be held in Kfar Duma case

July 8, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: Court demands expert opinion from Probation Service

June 25, 2018: Deliberation on release of minor in Kfar Duma case

June 23, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: confessions invalidated, deliberation on Sunday – POSTPONED

June 22, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: confessions invalidated, deliberation on Sunday

June 19, 2018: Father of detainee in Kfar Duma case responds to verdict

June 19, 2018: Verdict in Kfar Duma case read at Lod District Court

June 14, 2018: Kfar Duma case: Protest opposite Justice Minister’s residence

June 11, 2018: Severe criticism by Rabbi Druckman of Kfar Duma trial

June 7, 2018: Demonstration of Kfar Duma interrogation torture methods

June 6, 2018: Kfar Duma case torture methods revealed by GSS interrogators

June 5, 2018: Rabbis demand investigation of Kfar Duma case torture

June 1, 2018: Parents of minor in Kfar Duma case level harsh criticism

May 13, 2018: Supreme Court orders consideration of remand alternative

April 16, 2018: Developments in Kfar Duma trial

March 29, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: “Allow our son to celebrate the Seder at home”

March 15, 2018: Kfar Duma arson incident trial

November 2, 2016: “Cover up”: Documents in the Kfar Duma case disappeared

June 19, 2016: Kfar Duma incident: Youth coordinator exonerated of all guilt

March 20, 2016: New developments in Kfar Duma case

January 6, 2016: Attorney General’s office cancels hearing

January 4, 2016: Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem: “Check claims of torture”

January 3, 2016: Honenu demands: Lift the gag order!

December 30, 2015: Minors released from remand

December 30, 2015: Photographic evidence: Detained minor attempted suicide

December 29, 2015: Court orders release, State Prosecutor and police refuse

December 28, 2015: Judge orders Kfar Duma case detainee released

December 28, 2015: Detainee held under extreme conditions charged with minor incident

December 23, 2015: Demonstrators violently detained

December 23, 2015: Demonstrators detained protesting GSS torture released

December 23, 2015: Honenu Attorney to Knesset Minister: “No justification for sadistic torture in this case”

December 20, 2015: Revealed during deliberation: One of the detainees attempted suicide

December 20, 2015: Two Kfar Duma case detainees to be released

December 17, 2015: Honenu press conference: Interrogators applied severe methods of torture

December 16, 2015: Detainee’s mother faints in court

December 9, 2015: Open letter from Kochav HaShachar: “Red lines have been crossed.”

December 8, 2015: Detainees not allowed to lay tefilin, light Hanukkah candles

December 6, 2015: GSS interrogated detainee’s relatives

September 1, 2015: Minor released from remand, issued administrative order

August 23, 2015: Nine administrative orders served in one day

August 19, 2015: Minors suspected of arson to be released

August 18, 2015: District court accepted appeal by police, Honenu appealed to Supreme Court

August 17, 2015: Detainees released to house arrest, police appealed

 

Shortly after the arson attack in Kfar Duma, Meir Ettinger, Eviatar Slonim and Mordechai Meyer were detained on suspicion of involvement with the attack. They were held in remand, part of the time in solitary confinement after being illegally transferred to a high security wing, and in the end released without being charged. For an overview of their cases, please click on the links below. Slonim was released from administrative detention to house arrest at night for six months. Meyer was released after it turned out that Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon had signed a six-month administrative detention order on the basis of erroneous information transferred to him by the GSS.

 

January 27, 2016: Hunger striking detainee loses consciousness

January 26, 2016: Two administrative detainees on hunger strike

January 3, 2016: Administrative detainee to be released, not involved with incident attributed to him

November 17, 2015: Ettinger and Slonim to remain under administrative detention, court cited “extreme ideology”

November 4, 2015: Decision to be given in 6 weeks on administrative detainees

October 27, 2015: Imprisoned terrorists repeatedly threaten administrative detainee

October 13, 2015: Ettinger allowed to speak to family, ends hunger strike

October 13, 2015: Court authorizes transfer of administrative detainees to solitary confinement

October 11, 2015: Prison Service admits to violation of law

October 8, 2015: Meir Ettinger starts hunger strike

October 7, 2015: Administrative detainees illegally transferred to high security wing

September 20, 2015: Court authorized administrative order for Ettinger

September 10, 2015: “Confidential material” included articles posted openly on Internet

August 14, 2015: Mordechai Meyer’s parents sent letter to Defense Minister

August 6, 2015: Representatives of the State did not give suitable answers

August 4, 2015: Complaint sent to AG on GSS interrogation methods

Top NGO donors to UNRWA

View of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) building during a strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 26, 2018. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** אונר"א
עזה
בניין
שביתה

Donor Contribution (US$)
UNRWA USA National Committee 3,008,050
Islamic Relief USA 2,740,000
King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Centre 2,455,000
UNRWA Spanish Committee 1,665,579
Qatar Charity 1,500,000
Al Ansari Holding L.L.C 1,000,000
Muslim World League 1,000,000
Novo Nordisk 736,050
Foundation to Promote Open Society (FPOS) 700,000
Norwegian Refugee Council 688,686
Development Action without Borders, Naba’a 573,640
International Islamic Charitable Organizat​​ion (IICO) 519,292
RedR Australia 471,932
Southern New Hampshire University 225,000
Campaign For the Children of Palestine, Japan 218,614
Hasene International e.V 186,258
Handicap International 171,900
RKK 129,652
IDB 120,000
Kuwait Red Crescent Society 115,000
  Contribution data accurate as of 31 December 2020.

 

 

Source: UNRWA.org