Coalition for unrwa education policy change

View of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) building during a strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 26, 2018. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** אונר"א
עזה
בניין
שביתה

The time has come to launch a coalition for Unrwa Education Policy Change, with initiators from Israel, Germany, Sweden, the UK, Canada, US and Australia, all major funders of UNRWAthe United Nations Relief and Works Agency, launched as a temporary agency for refugees from the 1948 war. Their descendants have been there ever since.
Let us ask citizens in each of these prominent UNRWA donor nations to ameliorate the current UNRWA school system, which now defies the values of the United Nations.

The first Unrwa Education Policy Change conference will convene, following November elections, in the US and in Israel.

Let us raise funds to provide an alternative to the current direction of UNRWA education, which does not allow any child to see past the illusion of the “right of return”

The coalition for Unrwa Education Policy Change has one purpose in mind: to transform UNRWA schools into an oasis of peace and reconciliation, so that a future of dignity can be advanced for the next generation of UNRWA young people to see beyond the squalor of 59 “temporary” refugee camps, where their families have dwelled with no hope and no future for over 70 years.

The coalition for Unrwa Education Policy Change will provide a practial vision of peace and reconciliation for the 6.7 million descendants of the 1948 war which they have never seen.

Injustices at Berkeley

From Boston to Los Angeles, what started as a trickle of outrage has cascaded into huge marches in the streets in solidarity with the long-suffering Iranian people after the Ayatollah Khamenei regime’s torture and brutal murder of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman, for failing to fully cover her hair.
You would expect that such an outrageous crime against humanity would bring to the front lines women’s rights leader Linda Sarsour, and US Congresswomen Omar, Tlaib, and AOC. Nothing. Crickets.

You would hope that the nearly three weeks of protests by Iranian trade union members and university students, some of whom have been arrested, maimed, or killed, would kindle mass acts of solidarity. That the rising death toll and mounting arrests would inspire demands that members of faculties at major US universities – including Princeton and Oberlin – who’ve defended the Holocaust-denying ayatollah and his regime’s horrific crushing of the human rights of their own people, be removed from their seats in America’s “Ivory Tower of Academia.”

And how about the elites at the University of California, Berkeley? Back in the roiling 1960s, Berkeley students practically invented sit-ins and student strikes – demanding an end to any and all censorship and full freedom of speech on campus.

And today? Are they working to galvanize a nation to stand for the oppressed in Iran? In Ukraine? In China? In North Korea? In Cuba? In Nicaragua? Have they shown solidarity with the estimated 80% of the world’s believers who are discriminated against because of their faiths?

Perhaps there are some voices on campus trying to do their share to speak out for the truly oppressed. But if they exist, they’re drowned out by the Berkeley University Law School elite who are uniting to condemn, demonize and silence the most dangerous people on the planet – Zionists, and to in effect create “Jew-free” zones to protect the righteous zip code from such poison.

In a campaign worthy of Soviet universities in the heyday of Stalin’s Russia, or Mao’s China, or Ayatollah Khamenei’s Iran, nine different law student groups at the University of California, Berkeley’s School of Law, launched this new academic year by amending their bylaws to ensure that they will never invite any speakers that support Israel or Zionism. They include a who’s who of our nation’s future legal elite: Women of Berkeley Law, Asian Pacific American Law Students Association, Middle Eastern and North African Law Students Association, Law Students of African Descent, and the Queer Caucus.

Please spare us the phony argument that this is merely an anti-Zionist, not anti-Semitic, exercise. Today, the world’s largest Jewish community, nearly 7 million Jews, resides in Israel, fulfilling 2,000 years of yearning and prayer by Jews the world over to return to Zion, the land of Israel. The overwhelming majority of Jews in the Diaspora support Israel in word and deed.

None of this means that Israel or any other state deserves a moral blank check for everything they do. No nation does. But in 2022 we are witnessing an assault not on Israeli policies but on the very legitimacy of a sovereign Jewish state. Israel, and Israel alone, is slandered as an apartheid state, a colonialist afterthought, a Nazi-like occupier, a harvester of Palestinian organs, a serial murderer of children. All lies. Yet all these cancers spread through our campuses, poisoning attitudes toward Jews.

Then, if Israelis are Nazis, what should you do when threatened by Nazis? You kill them. So that’s not terrorism, that’s heroism, acts by innocent Palestinians yearning to be free.

How to react to Israel’s Zionist supporters? You boycott them, you threaten their synagogues, schools, and leaders with online maps listing names and addresses on social media; you create hostile environments so that many Jews begin to hide their Stars of David and remove their kippahs in public. Against this backdrop, the continuing surge of anti-Semitic acts continues to plague cities with large Jewish populations, including the biggest one of all – New York City.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center is urging the UC Regents and California Gov. Gavin Newsom to take action, to withhold any state funding from law school-linked student associations. We urge UC Berkeley to call out law students who are seeking to destroy freedom of speech and to institute Stalin-like censorship.

But more must be done and not only at Berkeley.

Our institution’s namesake, Simon Wiesenthal, a Jewish architect who lost 89 members of his family in the Nazi Holocaust and went on to become the famed Nazi hunter, told us that the Holocaust taught him that Jews alone will never defeat antisemitism. We need friends and new allies to act against history’s oldest hate, Wiesenthal said.

Now is the time we Jews need our neighbors, university alumni, philanthropic donors, elected officials, and social influencers from New York to Illinois to California to take on the latest pernicious variant of this deadly virus.

Remember, too, that history has shown time and again that it begins with the Jews, it never ends with the Jews.

Rabbi Marvin Hier is the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s founder, CEO and a two-time Academy Award-winner. Rabbi Abraham Cooper is the center’s associate dean and global social action director.

This is the report of an intelligence officer with decades of experience in the Russian world and deep insights into the Soviet mindset.

Premise

1. Putin is a ruthless KGB officer. No less ruthless than Stalin and Hitler.
2. Putin firmly holds that the Russian nation, with its values, culture and orthodox religion constitutes the last bastion of Christendom against moral corruption and death.
3. Corruption and moral death in his worldview are embodied by profiteering, cosmopolitanism, individualism, hedonism and sexual immorality.
4. The global centers of this decadence are Hollywood, Las Vegas and Wall Street.

Corollary

Due to the premises listed above Putin is a latent anti-Semite. So far his antisemitism has been kept in check by the following factors:

1. Jews are an economic, cultural and PR blessing for every land they reside in. Putin, as a history buff, understands this well.
2. Putin knows that the Jewish people and the Russian people both suffered terribly under a common enemy: Nazism.
3. Whatever misgivings Putin may have always felt about Jewish political liberalism, cultural avantgardism and cosmopolitanism, he has felt it wiser to hug Russian Jews in order to be on friendly terms with them and their “international networks”.

Anti-Corollary

Putin now feels betrayed by Jews around him and by the Jewish world as a whole:

1. Few Russian Jewish personalities have supported his military campaign against Ukraine.
2. Russian Jews have been disproportionately hostile to the military campaign against Kyiv.
3. Russian Jewish emigration has by far exceeded that of other ethnic communities in the Russian Federation. This threatens Putin with a brain drain and is viewed by him as a personal “Dolchstoss”.
4. Many visible leaders of resistance to Putin’s plans are Jewish: Zelensky, Blinken, the famous artist Pugacheva who has recently fled to Israel with her husband and countless oligarchs and influential bloggers and intellectuals.

Consequences

Putin has started talking a threatening language towards the Jewish people:

1. He has curbed the activities of the Jewish Agency.
2. He has publicly demanded more “patriotism” and “commitment” from Russian Jews.
3. He has invoked Satan in his speeches. From a Christian metaphysical viewpoint, there is nothing closer to Satan than those whom Christian orthodox tradition blames of having murdered the Lord.

Warning

Putin, if pushed too much into a corner, could be tempted to strike the Jewish state. Why?

1. Since Israel is not a NATO-member this would not invite immediate retaliation against Russia.
2. The Arab and Muslim world, together with scores of antisemites all over the globe, would celebrate this assault and view Russia and Putin as redeemers.
3. Zelensky would be caught in the crucible of fighting and/or negotiating as a Ukrainian or as a Jew. An impossible dilemma! Anthony Blinken will blink too.

Solution

1. Israel must preserve its neutrality between Russia and Ukraine at all costs.
2. Israel should on Twitter ask Zelensky to seek a fair peace and remember that he is no Conan the Barbarian or Rambo. The message of this quip will be clear.
3. In exchange for Russian diplomatic and economic pressure on Iran, Israel should quietly allow Azerbaijan to deliver drones to Russia.

The former strategy will have these advantages:

1. Israel will demonstrate to the non-hawkish Biden administration and to the dovish German government that it does not want Zelensky to push Putin into a corner and possibly unleash a nuclear war.
2. Israel will demonstrate to Putin that Jews do not by default support other Jews, as Zelensky assumed when he addressed the Knesset and as so do too many non-Jews.
3. If push comes to shove, Israel can argue to Russian emissaries that Zelensky, with his Gentile wife and baptized children, is a terrible Jewish hero that the Jewish State wishes to cut to size.
4. Azerbaijan will exhaust its drone reserves and Israel will assure America and France on the side that it will not replenish these stocks in order for Armenia to be less vulnerable to another Azerbaijani assault.
5. Pressured also by Russia and under intense domestic turmoil, Iran will submit to the conditions demanded by the international community for the neutralization of its nuclear goals.
6. Russia will hold its ground militarily and the resulting stalemate will lead to a negotiated peace agreement that will have no clear winners, but one clear loser: Putin and his clique.

These outcomes are far superior than humiliating Russia and causing a social and political collapse in the Russian Federation akin to that of Germany in 1918 or that of Iraq after its liberation. Nuclear powers cannot be pushed to implode for the sake of the world as a whole.

For further clarification of these issues, feel free to reply to this message

Babi Yar: Erev Yom Kippur September 1941

On September 29-30, 1941, the eve of Yom Kippur, the Germans murdered 33,771 Jewish men, women and children in Babi Yar, almost four miles from the center of Kiev, the capital of the Soviet Ukrainian Republic. Although Babi Yar was “not the largest Holocaust era mass-murder site on Soviet soil,” it was significant for two reasons, historian Shay Pilnik explains. Kiev, with a Jewish population of 160,000, was “the hub for Jewish culture,” and the first European capital to become Judenrein (free of Jews) during the Holocaust.

Pilnik quotes historian Lucy Dawidowicz, who remarked that the “unprecedented” pace of the killings, which occurred within 36 hours, is the second reason for Babi Yar’s importance. The numbers established “a record in the annals of mass murder,” she said. At Auschwitz-Birkenau, the total capacity of the four gas chambers and crematoria was a maximum of 6,0000 a day at its peak.

Another justification for Babi Yar’s uniqueness Shay said, was that although the site “was not the largest killing field during World War II in the Soviet Union, the approximate number of 100,000 dead in Babi Yar, the overwhelming majority of whom were Jewish, helped establish Babi Yar’s position as the centerpiece of the Holocaust in the USSR.”

Arrival in Kiev

On September 19, 1941 German troops entered Kiev, Dawidowicz noted. They were accompanied by Sonderkommando (special commando) 4a, an advance group of Einsatzgruppe C that had been assigned to Ukraine. By September 25, the entire Einsatzgruppe C had arrived in Kiev. Before the Soviet troops escaped from the capital, they placed delayed time explosives in downtown Kiev. On September 24, the bombs began exploding, engulfing the entire city center in flames. Many buildings were completely gutted and destroyed, with people having to be evacuated. Approximately 25,000 were left homeless.

An Excuse to Murder Jews

The Germans seized the opportunity to accuse the Jews of Kiev of planting the bombs. “Judaism in the East,” Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the Reich Security Main Office [RSHA], advised them, “is the source of Bolshevism and must therefore be wiped out in accordance with the Fuhrer’s aims.” After a meeting with Emil Otto Rasch, Einsatzgruppe A Commander, Sonderkommando commanding officer Paul Blobel had explosives placed under the Dormition Cathedral at the Pechersk Monastery, which destroyed a significant portion of the nearly 900-year-old building, according to historian Richard Breitman.

Blobel then had placards printed instructing all Jews of Kiev to meet on September 29 at 8 a.m. near the Jewish and Russian cemeteries. The notices were distributed throughout the city by the recently recruited Ukrainian militia, Dawidowicz said. She also noted that many people in Ukraine and in other areas of the Soviet Union hailed the German invaders, with some having actively “collaborated in the wholesale slaughter.”

Jews were ordered to bring “documents, money, valuables and also warm clothing, underwear, etc.,” Dawidowicz added. They were told that those who defied the directive would be shot. Like the Jews in other areas of the Soviet Union, the Jews in Kiev had little or no knowledge about the antisemitic designs of the Third Reich. A German intelligence officer observed how Russian Jews were “shockingly ill-informed about our attitude toward them.” Practically everyone assumed they would be “resettled,” since they were to gather near a railroad siding. Some believed the rumors that Germans were sending them to Palestine.

As uninformed as the Jews were about the German ultimate objectives, they began their hopeless march with a sense of uncertainty and apprehension, Dawidowicz said. Some Ukrainians offered to assist their friends, although most watched “with indifference.”

The Procession to Babi Yar

On September 29, Breitman said, more than 30,000 Jews appeared as directed, in spite of the cold weather. The streets leading to the ravine in the northwest part of Kiev were blocked as the Jews were being led to their death. As their food and possessions were being confiscated and placed on mounds, the Jews began to be frightened; panic ensued. “The lines,” Dawidowicz said, “seemed to stop moving, and people were crushed together, exhausted, terrified. The children were crying. Disorder, despair, nightmare.”

Describing the horrifying scene afterwards she said: “Then the Germans began shoving the Jews into new narrower lines. They moved very slowly. After a long walk, they came to a passageway formed by German soldiers with truncheons and police dogs. The Jews were whipped through. The dogs went at those who fell. But the pressure of the surging lines behind was irresistible, and the weak and the injured were trod underfoot. Bruised and bloodied, numbed by the incomprehensibility of their fate, the Jews emerged onto a grassy clearing. They had arrived at Babi Yar; ahead of them lay the ravine. The ground was strewn with clothing. Ukrainian militiamen, supervised by Germans, ordered the Jews to undress. Those who balked, who resisted, were assaulted, their clothes ripped off. Naked bleeding people were everywhere. Screams and hysterical laughter filled the air. Some people’s hair turned gray on the spot. Others went mad in moments.”

The Jews were then led to a narrow ledge near the ravines. Obscured from view, the Germans arranged machine guns so that when the ledge held as many Jews as it could accommodate, they opened fire. Dawidowicz noted, “The bodies toppled into the ravine, piling up layer upon layer. Where once a clear stream flowed, now blood ran.”

The executions lasted for an hour at a time, before the men were relieved, and another group took over. At certain points, the Germans and Ukrainian militiamen went down to the ravine, “trampling over the bodies” to make sure the Jews were dead, pushing them down to allow more to be buried, and then covering the bodies with sand from the quarry.

A Final Note

Murders continued at Babi Yar for a number of months, Dawidowicz said, but never to the extent as on September 29-30, when 33,771 Jews were slaughtered, simply because they were Jews. “Mass murder transforms … the physical environment” observed historian Wendy Lower. “What were rolling hills and sylvan glades in Ukraine became rough craters, death mounds and scorched patches.” There were also ravines like Babi Yar, which were packed with bodies and lime chloride, then sealed by dynamite.

These sites were not in remote areas, Lower points out. Very often, they “encroached on shortcuts and paths that connected towns.” They were locations of interest and of plundering. German men and women used the “meadows for picnics, the forests for hunting, and the swimming holes for cooling off and sunbathing.”

Dawidowicz concluded that “inside the Soviet Union … Babi Yar has come to represent more than the site of a Nazi massacre, one among dozens. It speaks as well to a whole range of Jewish experience in Russia, an often harsh and sometimes bloodstained history that reaches back to pogroms under the czars and on to the arrests and virulent propaganda attacks” in the former Soviet Union.

Dr. Alex Grobman is the senior resident scholar at the John C. Danforth Society, a member of the Council of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, and on the advisory board of The National Christian Leadership Conference of Israel (NCLCI). He lives in Jerusalem.

I’ve Studied 13 Days of the Cuban Missile Crisis. This Is What I See When I Look at Putin.

Mr. Dobbs is a former foreign correspondent who covered the collapse of communism and the author of “One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War.”

Two nuclear-armed states on a collision course with no obvious exit ramp. An erratic Russian leader using apocalyptic language — “if you want us to all meet in hell, it’s up to you.” Showdowns at the United Nations, with each side accusing the other of essentially gambling with Armageddon.

For six decades, the Cuban missile crisis has been viewed as the defining confrontation of the modern age, the world’s closest brush with nuclear annihilation. The war in Ukraine presents perils of at least equal magnitude, particularly now that Vladimir Putin has backed himself into a corner by declaring large chunks of neighboring Ukraine as belonging to Russia “forever.”

As two countries proceed up an escalatory ladder, mistakes become increasingly likely — as the Cuban missile crisis made clear. In a conventional war, it is possible for political leaders to make significant mistakes and for the human race to survive, battered but intact. In a nuclear standoff, even a minor misunderstanding or miscommunication can have catastrophic consequences.

In October 1962, it was President John Kennedy who declared a naval blockade, or quarantine, of Cuba to prevent reinforcement of the Soviet military position on the island. This put the onus on his Kremlin counterpart, Nikita Khrushchev, to either accept the clearly signaled American condition for ending the crisis (a full withdrawal of Soviet missiles from Cuba) or risk nuclear war.

This time, the roles are reversed: Mr. Putin is seeking to enforce a red line by insisting he will use “all available means,” including his nuclear arsenal, to defend the newly, unilaterally expanded borders of Mother Russia. President Biden has promised to support Ukraine’s attempts to defend itself. It is unclear how Mr. Putin will react to his red line being ignored.

Even if we assume Mr. Putin is a rational actor who wishes to avoid nuclear annihilation, that is not necessarily reassuring. Contrary to popular belief, the biggest danger of nuclear war in October 1962 did not arise from the so-called eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation between Khrushchev and Kennedy but from their inability to control events that they themselves had set in motion.

As I discovered when I assembled a minute-by-minute chronology of the most dangerous phase of the crisis, there were times when both leaders were unaware of developments on the battlefield that assumed a logic and momentum of their own.

Khrushchev never authorized the shooting down of an American U-2 spy plane over Cuba by a Soviet missile on Oct. 27, 1962, the most dangerous day of the crisis. Kennedy was unaware that another U-2 strayed over Russian airspace the same day, triggering Soviet air defenses. “There’s always some sonofabitch that doesn’t get the word,” was how he put it later.

While the war in Ukraine is obviously different from the Cuban missile crisis, it is not hard to imagine comparable failures and miscalculations. A stray shell from either side could cause an accident at a nuclear power plant, spewing radioactive fallout over much of Europe. A bungled attempt by Russia to interdict Western military supplies to Ukraine could spill over into NATO countries like Poland, triggering an automatic U.S. response. A Russian decision to use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukrainian troop formations could escalate into a full-blown nuclear exchange with the United States.

While the U.S. intelligence community has chalked up some impressive successes in Ukraine, most notably its accurate prediction of Russia’s invasion, which occurred on Feb. 24, the 1962 crisis should serve as a reminder of the limits of intelligence gathering. Kennedy was belatedly informed about the deployment of medium-range Soviet missiles to Cuba, but was left in the dark about other equally important matters. He was unaware, for example, of the presence of nearly 100 Soviet tactical nuclear missiles in Cuba targeted on the Guantánamo naval base and a potential American invading force. The C.I.A. underestimated Soviet troop strength on the island and was unable to track the movement of any of the nuclear warheads.

What both Kennedy and Khrushchev did possess was an intuitive understanding of the peril confronting not just their own countries but the entire world if the crisis was allowed to escalate. That is why they maintained a back channel to communicate with each other privately (through the president’s brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, and the Soviet ambassador to Washington, Anatoly Dobrynin) even as they denounced each other publicly. It is also why they acted swiftly to reach a compromise deal (kept secret for decades) that involved the dismantling of U.S. medium-range missiles in Turkey in exchange for a Soviet nuclear withdrawal from Cuba.

Like Kennedy, Khrushchev had experienced the horror of World War II. He knew that nuclear war would be many times more destructive. Kremlin archives show that for all his bloodcurdling rhetoric, Khrushchev was determined to find a peaceful solution as soon as it became clear that his nuclear gamble had failed. Mr. Putin, by contrast, has chosen to raise the stakes at every critical point. Escalation has become his preferred tactic.

All this is taking place against the background of a communications revolution that has sped up the pace of warfare and diplomacy, resolving some of the technological challenges faced by Kennedy and Khrushchev but creating new ones in their place. It no longer takes 12 hours to transmit a coded telegram from Washington to Moscow. These days, news travels from the battlefield almost instantaneously, putting pressure on political leaders to make hasty decisions. A U.S. president no longer has the luxury that Kennedy enjoyed in October 1962 of taking six days to consider his response to the discovery of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba.

We have not begun to approach the nuclear alert levels that characterized the Cuban missile crisis. While Mr. Putin has talked about putting his nuclear forces on heightened alert, there appears to be no confirmation of unusual movements in that direction. The most dangerous phase of the Cuban missile crisis lasted just 13 days; we are already in the eighth month of the war in Ukraine, with no end in sight. The longer it drags on, the greater the threat of some terrible miscalculation.

Michael Dobbs is a former foreign correspondent who covered the collapse of communism and is the author of “One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on FacebookTwitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Kfar Duma Arson Case

Since the July 2015 arson attack on the Dawabsheh family’s house Kfar Duma, Honenu has assisted many Jews accused of involvement with the crime. To familiarize our readers with the case, Honenu has gathered – click here – various articles and short videos on the subject. For a selection of cases in which Honenu Attorneys represented defendants and GSS interrogatees, see the links below

September 22, 2022: Honenu to Chief Rabbis: Help Ben Uliel pray with a minyan

September 11, 2022: Honenu: Allow Ben Uliel his religious rights on the High Holidays

September 1, 2022: Attorney Feldman: Supreme Court ruling authorizes confession by torture

September 1, 2022: Supreme Court rejects Ben Uliel appeal

August 31, 2022: Tomorrow: Supreme Court decision on Ben Uliel appeal

August 18, 2022: Against regulations, Ben Uliel not allowed to hug his daughter at visit

July 4, 2022: “Welcome to your GSS interrogation” – A detainee breaks his silence

March 31, 2022: Ben Uliel still held under severe conditions

March 8, 2022: Rabbinical establishment demands fair trial for Ben Uliel

March 7, 2022: First Supreme Court hearing held on Ben Uliel’s appeal

March 7, 2022: Protest for Ben Uliel: “Torture Leads To Lies!”

March 6, 2022: Six house-torchings in one year: What actually happened in Kfar Duma?

March 6, 2022: The car that was or wasn’t

March 6, 2022: The reenactment – Where is the missing recording?

Screenshot, Malchut Ben Uliel; Courtesy of the family

March 6, 2022: The cement pillars that Ben Uliel did not remember

March 6, 2022: The matter of “concealed information”

March 6, 2022: The black car, selective validation of testimony

March 6, 2022: The GSS admitted that the Kfar Duma murder has not been completely solved

March 6, 2022: Ben Uliel’s daughter: “It’s very hard for me. Please come to the protest.”

March 1, 2022: Duma case: New video demonstrates GSS torture method

September 1, 2021: “Wedding of Hate” defendants exonerated

August 17, 2021: Supreme Court ordered DA’s office to present confidential material

July 27, 2021: Honenu – Podcast listings

July 27, 2021: Episode 4 of Honenu’s podcast: Duma case, Part 4

July 15, 2021: Court rejects Duma case minor’s appeal

July 7, 2021: Episode 3 of Honenu’s podcast: Duma case, Part 3

June 30, 2021: Episode 2 of Honenu’s podcast: Duma case, Part 2

June 27, 2021: Ben Uliel’s attorneys request investigative material – Appeals stage

June 22, 2021: Honenu launches podcast

April 28, 2021: Defense might request retrial for Duma case minor

April 19, 2021: Ya’alon to testify for the defense in “Wedding of Hate” trial

March 15, 2021: Ben Uliel’s attorneys request gag order cancellation

March 11, 2021: Gag order on appeal by Ben Uliel

March 8, 2021: Ben Uliel’s attorneys request investigative material

December 21, 2020: Minor in Duma case: “I want to return to normal life”

October 29, 2020: Defense team being formed for Ben Uliel’s appeal

September 27, 2020: Will Ben Uliel pray in a minyan on Yom Kippur?

September 17, 2020: Rabbi Levanon: Ben Uliel not guilty

September 16, 2020: 42 months’ imprisonment for minor in Duma case

September 14, 2020: Rabbis support campaign to fund Ben Uliel’s Supreme Court appeal

September 7, 2020: Ben Uliel’s conviction left standing

September 7, 2020: Orian Ben Uliel sent letter to Central District Court

August 6, 2020: New evidence in Kfar Duma case

June 11, 2020: Progress in “Wedding of Hate” case

June 9, 2020: Joint List members cause disturbance at Duma trial

May 18, 2020: “You have imprisoned an innocent man!”

May 17, 2020: Verdict to be handed down for Ben Uliel

May 12, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 4

May 3, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 3

April 23, 2020: Verdict postponed in Kfar Duma case

April 23, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 2

April 16, 2020: “Exposing the Duma Blood Libel” – Part 1

March 19, 2020: Ben Uliel not allowed contact with family

March 3, 2020: Many irregularities in Kfar Duma case

February 29, 2020: Bill of indictment contradicts eye witnesses

February 27, 2020: Court canceled Ben Uliel’s petition

February 25, 2020: Ben Uliel to be transferred to Eshel Prison

October 24, 2019: Kfar Duma trial: Verdict handed down to minor

October 23, 2019: Kfar Duma trial: Verdict for GSS tortured minor

October 8, 2019: Request: Allow prisoners minyan on Yom Kippur

August 11, 2019: Kfar Duma case: DA’s office rejects District Court’s opinion

July 24, 2019: Expert opinion: Kfar Duma graffiti not by Ben Uliel

June 26, 2019: Kfar Duma trial, defense phase

May 16, 2019: Kfar Duma resident speaks to PI

May 12, 2019: Plea bargain disconnects minor from Duma case

April 30, 2019: More evidence lost in ‘Wedding of Hate’ case

April 6, 2019: Duma case survey: GSS version not reliable

December 21, 2018: Former GSS Deputy Director on false confessions

December 12, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: Evidence from scene incompatible with confessions

December 9, 2018: GSS agent to testify in Kfar Duma trial

December 3, 2018: “Duma Blood Libel” Facebook page administrators to distribute booklet

November 16, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: Ben Uliel’s alibi not investigated

October 28, 2018: Call to reexamine Kfar Duma case

October 22, 2018: Evidence lost in ‘Wedding of Hate’ trial

October 14, 2018: Kfar Duma trial to be held in open courtroom

September 6, 2018: GSS testimonies in Kfar Duma trial to remain under immunity

September 6, 2018: Will GSS agents’ testimonies of torture be revealed?

September 5, 2018: The Kfar Duma trial continues

July 15, 2018: Honenu director Meidad: “Release Ben Uliel!”

July 15, 2018: Supreme Court releases minor in Kfar Duma case

July 13, 2018: AG’s office appeals decision in Kfar Duma case

July 12, 2018: Deliberation on minor in Kfar Duma case

July 12, 2018: Kfar Duma case: Deliberation expected to be held shortly

July 11, 2018: Deliberation to be held in Kfar Duma case

July 8, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: Court demands expert opinion from Probation Service

June 25, 2018: Deliberation on release of minor in Kfar Duma case

June 23, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: confessions invalidated, deliberation on Sunday – POSTPONED

June 22, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: confessions invalidated, deliberation on Sunday

June 19, 2018: Father of detainee in Kfar Duma case responds to verdict

June 19, 2018: Verdict in Kfar Duma case read at Lod District Court

June 14, 2018: Kfar Duma case: Protest opposite Justice Minister’s residence

June 11, 2018: Severe criticism by Rabbi Druckman of Kfar Duma trial

June 7, 2018: Demonstration of Kfar Duma interrogation torture methods

June 6, 2018: Kfar Duma case torture methods revealed by GSS interrogators

June 5, 2018: Rabbis demand investigation of Kfar Duma case torture

June 1, 2018: Parents of minor in Kfar Duma case level harsh criticism

May 13, 2018: Supreme Court orders consideration of remand alternative

April 16, 2018: Developments in Kfar Duma trial

March 29, 2018: Kfar Duma trial: “Allow our son to celebrate the Seder at home”

March 15, 2018: Kfar Duma arson incident trial

November 2, 2016: “Cover up”: Documents in the Kfar Duma case disappeared

June 19, 2016: Kfar Duma incident: Youth coordinator exonerated of all guilt

March 20, 2016: New developments in Kfar Duma case

January 6, 2016: Attorney General’s office cancels hearing

January 4, 2016: Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem: “Check claims of torture”

January 3, 2016: Honenu demands: Lift the gag order!

December 30, 2015: Minors released from remand

December 30, 2015: Photographic evidence: Detained minor attempted suicide

December 29, 2015: Court orders release, State Prosecutor and police refuse

December 28, 2015: Judge orders Kfar Duma case detainee released

December 28, 2015: Detainee held under extreme conditions charged with minor incident

December 23, 2015: Demonstrators violently detained

December 23, 2015: Demonstrators detained protesting GSS torture released

December 23, 2015: Honenu Attorney to Knesset Minister: “No justification for sadistic torture in this case”

December 20, 2015: Revealed during deliberation: One of the detainees attempted suicide

December 20, 2015: Two Kfar Duma case detainees to be released

December 17, 2015: Honenu press conference: Interrogators applied severe methods of torture

December 16, 2015: Detainee’s mother faints in court

December 9, 2015: Open letter from Kochav HaShachar: “Red lines have been crossed.”

December 8, 2015: Detainees not allowed to lay tefilin, light Hanukkah candles

December 6, 2015: GSS interrogated detainee’s relatives

September 1, 2015: Minor released from remand, issued administrative order

August 23, 2015: Nine administrative orders served in one day

August 19, 2015: Minors suspected of arson to be released

August 18, 2015: District court accepted appeal by police, Honenu appealed to Supreme Court

August 17, 2015: Detainees released to house arrest, police appealed

 

Shortly after the arson attack in Kfar Duma, Meir Ettinger, Eviatar Slonim and Mordechai Meyer were detained on suspicion of involvement with the attack. They were held in remand, part of the time in solitary confinement after being illegally transferred to a high security wing, and in the end released without being charged. For an overview of their cases, please click on the links below. Slonim was released from administrative detention to house arrest at night for six months. Meyer was released after it turned out that Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon had signed a six-month administrative detention order on the basis of erroneous information transferred to him by the GSS.

 

January 27, 2016: Hunger striking detainee loses consciousness

January 26, 2016: Two administrative detainees on hunger strike

January 3, 2016: Administrative detainee to be released, not involved with incident attributed to him

November 17, 2015: Ettinger and Slonim to remain under administrative detention, court cited “extreme ideology”

November 4, 2015: Decision to be given in 6 weeks on administrative detainees

October 27, 2015: Imprisoned terrorists repeatedly threaten administrative detainee

October 13, 2015: Ettinger allowed to speak to family, ends hunger strike

October 13, 2015: Court authorizes transfer of administrative detainees to solitary confinement

October 11, 2015: Prison Service admits to violation of law

October 8, 2015: Meir Ettinger starts hunger strike

October 7, 2015: Administrative detainees illegally transferred to high security wing

September 20, 2015: Court authorized administrative order for Ettinger

September 10, 2015: “Confidential material” included articles posted openly on Internet

August 14, 2015: Mordechai Meyer’s parents sent letter to Defense Minister

August 6, 2015: Representatives of the State did not give suitable answers

August 4, 2015: Complaint sent to AG on GSS interrogation methods

Top NGO donors to UNRWA

View of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) building during a strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 26, 2018. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** אונר"א
עזה
בניין
שביתה

Donor Contribution (US$)
UNRWA USA National Committee 3,008,050
Islamic Relief USA 2,740,000
King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Centre 2,455,000
UNRWA Spanish Committee 1,665,579
Qatar Charity 1,500,000
Al Ansari Holding L.L.C 1,000,000
Muslim World League 1,000,000
Novo Nordisk 736,050
Foundation to Promote Open Society (FPOS) 700,000
Norwegian Refugee Council 688,686
Development Action without Borders, Naba’a 573,640
International Islamic Charitable Organizat​​ion (IICO) 519,292
RedR Australia 471,932
Southern New Hampshire University 225,000
Campaign For the Children of Palestine, Japan 218,614
Hasene International e.V 186,258
Handicap International 171,900
RKK 129,652
IDB 120,000
Kuwait Red Crescent Society 115,000
  Contribution data accurate as of 31 December 2020.

 

 

Source: UNRWA.org

Doubling Australian aid to UNRWA: A VITAL PERSPECTIVE,

The Australian government has announced that it will double to its aid to UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, which the UN created as a “temporary” entity in the wake of the Israel War of Independence, to help half a million Arabs displaced as a result of these hostilities.

Seventy-three years later, in texts taught in the UNRWA schools, Israel does not exist and is replaced by an entity known as “Palestine.”

In its defense, UNRWA claims that it has a robust system in place to ensure that the education it delivers in its classroom, including through the use of textbooks, is in line with UN values and principles.

As a journalist who has commissioned experts to examine 1000 books used in UNRWA schools in the West Bank and Gaza since their first appearance in 2000, I beg to differ.

UNRWA “education” is instead based on:

  1. De-legitimization of both the existence of the State of Israel and the Jews’ very presence in the country. Israel does not appear on the map and is replaced by Palestine as the sovereign state in the region. The Jews are presented as colonialist settlers and their cities — including Tel Aviv — do not appear on the map as well. The Jews’ holy places in the country are not recognized as such but rather presented as Muslim holy places usurped by the Jews (the Western Wall in Jerusalem, the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron and Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem).
  2. Massive demonization of both Israel and the Jews, with the latter being presented as enemies of Islam since its very beginning. Israel is depicted as an entirely evil entity with exclusive responsibility for the conflict while the Palestinians are portrayed as the ultimate victim. No objective information is given by UNRWA about Israel and the Jews that would balance this picture even slightly. Nor is there any reference in the books to Jewish-Israeli individuals as ordinary human beings. Rather, they are dealt with as a group, with the accompanying connotations of alienation and existential threat to the Palestinians.
  3. Absence of education for peace and coexistence with Israel. Instead, the books feature a call for a violent struggle for “the liberation of Palestine”.

All this begs the question: Will UNRWA continue to confine millions of these descendents of 1948 refugees to the indignity of life in 59 “temporary” refugee facilities for yet another 70 years?

While UNRWA acts under the aegis of the UN General Assembly, which will never allow a change in the UNRWA mandate to keep Arab refugees in refugee perpetuity, nothing prevents UNRWA donors such as the US from adopting policies that would solve the plight of five million people confined to the indignity of refugee life for perpetuity. In that context, the US could lead the 67 UNRWA donations to make the following reasonable conditions to renew aid to UNRWA:

  1. Cancel the new UNRWA curriculum, based on Jihad, martyrdom and the “right of return by force of arms”, which have no place in UN education, whose theme is “Peace Begins Here”. UNRWA contracts for exclusive use of Palestinian Authority schoolbooks in Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem and Gaza. Like all UN agencies, UNRWA is supposed to run schools based on the UN slogan “Peace Begins Here.” PA education, however, runs schools based on the ideology of the Palestine Liberation Organization: Conquest of Palestine by force of arms. The time has come for UNRWA donor nations, beginning with the US, ask for a cancelation of that UNRWA-PA contract.
  2. Cease paramilitary training in all UNRWA schools, an absurdity that our news agency and think tank has filmed and documented and shared with all UNRWA donor nations.
  3. Insist that UNRWA dismiss employees affiliated with Hamas- in accordance with laws on the books in western nations that forbid aid to any agency that employs members of a terrorist organization.
  4. Demand that UNRWA advance resettlement of fourth and fifth generation refugees from the 1948 war, who have spent seven decades relegated to the indignity of refugee status, passed down from one generation to another.
  5. Facilitate an audit of $1.5 billion donor funds that emanate from 67 nations, much of it in cash, which has resulted in wasted resources, duplication of services and an undesired flow of cash to the UNRWA-based terror groups that have dominated UNRWA operations for years.

*DAVID BEDEIN HAS COVERED UNRWA, SINCE HE PIONEERED AN INDEPENDENT NEWS AGENCY AND THINK TANK IN JERUSALEM IN DECEMBER 1987.

WITH UNRWA AS HIS NEWS FOCUS, DAVID HAS PRODUCED 24 FILMS SHOT ON LOCATION IN THE UNRWA REFUGEE CAMPS, AUTHORED TWO BOOKS ALONG WITH HUNDREDS OF IN-DEPTH ARTICLES THAT APPEAR ON HIS WEBSITES, UNRWA-MONITOR.COM AND ISRAELBEHINDTHENEWS.COM

HOLDING A MASTER’S DEGREE IN COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION SOCIAL WORK FROM YESHIVA UNIVERSITY, IN 1980, DAVID HAS MADE NUMEROUS PRESENTATIONS ABOUT UNRWA FOR THE US CONGRESS, THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENT, THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT, THE SWEDISH PARLIAMENT AND THE GERMAN BUNDESTAG, WITH ONE PURPOSE IN MIND: UNRWA POLICY REFORM. https://israelbehindthenews.com/2018/02/06/david-bedein-leading-fight-unrwa-reform-initiative/

David is now producing  a  new movie about UNRWA policy, shot on location at UNRWA refugee  facilities in Jerusalem and in Gaza, for presentation  at the UN, at the Knesset and at the Parliaments of  leading UNRWA donor nations. 

Funds needed to produce and promote the new UNRWA documentary. 

Donations can be contributed in any currency towards that goal. https://israelbehindthenews.com/donations/

 

*ABOUT THE AUTHOR

David Bedein, who grew up in Philadelphia and moved to Israel in 1970 at the age of 20, is an MSW community organizer by profession and an investigative journalist by avocation. In 1987 David established the Israel Resource News Agency, with offices at the Beit Agron Int’l Press Center in Jerusalem, where he also serves as Director of the Center for Near East Policy Research. In 1991, Bedein was the special CNN middle east radio correspondent. Since 2001, Bedein has contributed features to the newspaper Makor Rishon. In 2006, Bedein became the foreign correspondent for the Philadelphia Bulletin, writing 1,062 articles until the newspaper ceased operation in 2010. He is the author of ” The Genesis of the Palestinian Authority” and “ROADBLOCK TO PEACE- How the UN Perpetuates the Arab-Israeli Conflict: UNRWA policies reconsidered” and has produces twenty  short films about UNRWA policy- shot on location- which can be viewed at: http://tinyurl.com/lxc6xvs

A political ploy to curb free speech

In an act of chutzpah characteristic of the Israeli left, Prime Minister Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid Party has petitioned the Central Elections Committee (CEC) to declare Channel 14 a “propaganda platform” for Likud, headed by opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to the petition, submitted to the CEC on Wednesday by Economy and Industry Minister Orna Barbivai and Energy Minister Karine Elharrar, the right-wing news outlet, owned by billionaire Yitzchak Mirilashvili, “is a real threat to the basic principles” of Israeli elections, as it is “fully harnessed in favor of a candidate and a party, without balance and contrary to every standard of reasonableness, fairness and common sense.”

Click here to read full article. 

What the public at large has a right to know before the Nov. 1 elections

What is Not Generally Known to the Public in IsraeL, one month before elections:

The Palestinian Security Forces (PSF), trained by the IDF, now carry out daily attacks against Jews through its PSF elite unit known as the Al Aqsa Brigades.

Yet the government of Israel continues full security cooperation with the PSF . (1)

With the knowledge of the government of Israel, the Palestinian Authority has enacted unprecedented legislation to provide a salary for life for anyone who murders a Jew. (2)

People in Israel know that the PA often pays killers.

Few know that there is a law in this regard.

The government of Israel has never asked for the repeal of this PA law, which functions as an incentive to kill.

Instead, The government of Israeli reduces allocations to the PA according to the amount that the PA pays convicted killers, while allowing Saudi Arabia, Qatar & other nations to fill in the cash flow gap for convicted felons.

With the full knowledge of the government of Israel, the Palestinian Authority has fostered a new school curriculum which indoctrinates children to make war on the Jews.(3)ADVERTISEMENT

The government of Israel could veto that curriculum, yet does not use its authority to do so.

The government of Israel will not even demand that the PA remove a new PA textbook which presents Dalal Al Mugrabi, who murdered 35 Jews, including 12 children, as a role model for the next generation (4)

UNRWA allocates a $1.6 billion budget to maintain 6.7 million descendants of Arab refugees in 59 “temporary” refugee camps, as refugees for perpetuity, while inculcating the “right of return” to villages which existed before 1948. COGAT, the Israel Civil Administration, which oversees UNRWA, will not ask for any change in UNRWA policy (5)

Meanwhile, PA texts used by UNRWA now provide 120 new maps in UNRWA
schools which replace any Jewish presence with Arabic names –on both sides of the 1967 line- a new form of Judenrein. (6)ADVERTISEMENT

The government of Israel could order COGAT to stop distribution of these maps.

Israel could demand that the PA and UNRWA use standard world maps in their schools that depict the geographic details of each member state of the UN, including Israel.

Yet the current government of Israel will not make that demand.

Instead, the government of Israel encourages Israel business interests to invest in the Palestinian Authority, yet without vetting terror connections of their PA business partners. (7)

All this occurs, without beginning to mention the Arab encroachments in area C of Judea and Samaria that Regavim has documented so meticulously, while the government of Israel allows this to occur.
https://www.regavim.org/


1. https://israelbehindthenews.com/2011/05/05/dangers-us-aid-palestinian-security-forces-2/

2. https://israelbehindthenews.com/2017/01/11/incentivizing-terrorism-palestinian-authority-allocations-terrorists-families/

3. https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/?s=GROISS

4. https://israelbehindthenews.com/2021/11/30/dalal-al-mughrabi-a-murderous-terrorist-as-a-role-model-in-palestinian-authority-schoolbooks-used-by-unrwa-2/

5. https://israelbehindthenews.com/2019/04/02/six-policy-challenges-to-guide-unrwa-policy-reform/

6. https://israelbehindthenews.com/2022/09/24/revealing-maps-the-palestinian-vision-as-taught-in-unrwa-schools/

7,. https://israelbehindthenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Proposed-investigation-of-Israeli-Corporate-Corruption.pdf