Palestinian arabs are still actively fighting the 1947-9 war against the Jewish state

The president of the Palestinian Authority always fails to impress at the annual United Nations General Assembly forum. This year, he outdid himself in spectacular fashion, showcasing why there is no chance for peace anytime soon.

The 48 minute ramble was a disgrace from beginning to end. It is not worth a detailed review of the spouted delusions, but a summary is important to consider the mental and emotional state of this restless people. In short, Abbas believes the world is stuck with him in 1947; deems the Oslo Accords signed between Israel and the PA dead; considers Israelis as racist terrorists; and glorifies terrorists openly.

Abbas Now Accepts the 1947 UN Partition Plan

Abbas said that Israel has been colonizing Palestine for 75 years, since its very founding. He built on his term for Israel of a “painful historic settlement“, illegal as far as he is concerned for the past 100 years, not only since 1967.

He demanded that the United States, the United Kingdom and Israel apologize for the 1917 Balfour Declaration, the 1922 Mandate of Palestine, and the entire Zionist enterprise. He put it forward as an “official request” for the “major crime” and sought remedy and compensation.

Abbas also asked the entire UN to enforce Resolution 181 (@25:30). That resolution was the partition plan put forward in November 1947, which was accepted by Zionists but rejected by the entire Arab world, opting instead for war to destroy the Jews. Abbas said with a pointed finger, “Resolution 181 which you have adopted. Resolution 181 is the resolution that we want to be implemented. We want you to implement Resolution 181.”

It boggles the mind how the party which rejected the resolution – 75 years ago! – launched a war which killed one percent of the Israeli population – just a few years after the European Holocaust! – can somehow state that it has changed his mind. If the Arabs had known then that they’d lose the war and more territory, they might have accepted the plan.

Should Abbas figure out how to bring back the thousands of Jews murdered by Arabs over the past 75 years, I’m sure Israel would agree to go back to the borders proposed by the UN in 1947.

Oslo Accords Are Dead

Abbas made clear that he considers the Oslo Accords of 1993 (and 1995) to be dead, as he mistakenly believes that Israel tramples on the accords and only the Palestinians abide by them.

Somehow the multi-year 2000-2004 intifada-terrorism didn’t register in Abbas’ memory. The several wars from Hamas since the terrorist-political group took over Gaza, with over 20,000 rockets fired into Israel, did not trample on the accords. Israel giving the PA Areas A and B and the Gaza Strip was completely ignored.

Did Abbas even read the accords? Nowhere does it say that Israel cannot build homes for Jews in Area C. It says exactly the opposite, that Israel has sole control of the region until it gives more territory to the PA.

One of the conditions of the accords was that the PA would not seek recognition at any UN bodies – which it nevertheless did. Abbas said that the PA will now seek admission to even more organizations.

If Abbas truly wants to end the relationship with Israel established with the Accords, he must realize that he is inviting Israel to take back all of the land that was given to the PA under those same agreements.

Abbas Smears Israelis As Racist Terrorist

Abbas attacked Israel at 12:26, saying “Israel is enacting racist laws, consecrating the apartheid regime. Yes, apartheid, and if they do not like the appellation, this is the truth. They are an apartheid regime.” It was quite a comment, after Abbas had just said at 7:43 of the speech that “Israel did not leave us any land on which we can establish an independent state, in the frame of its frantic expansion. Where will our people live in freedom and dignity? Where can we build our independent state that will live in peace with its neighbors? We want to live in peace with them, with Israel. The settlements unfortunately constitute 751,000 [Jews], or 25% of the total population. 25 percent in the West Bank. The Palestinian land which remains for us. Israel is killing our people with impunity.”

Doesn’t Abbas realize that 26% of Israel’s population is not Jewish? If he believes that so many Jews possibly living in a new Palestinian State prevents Arabs from living in freedom and dignity, how does he possibly suggest Israel take in millions of Arab refugees when the country is only 74% Jewish now? How does he accuse Israel of being an apartheid regime when so many Arabs have full citizenship? Does Abbas blush at his hypocrisy as he demands a new country free of Jews and has existing laws against selling any land to Jews?

To make sure that the entire world and not just Israel was disgusted by his charges, Abbas doubled down on his heinous comment of a few weeks ago in Berlin, Germany when he accused Israel of committing “50 Holocausts” against Palestinians. At 16:30 of his rant Abbas said that “Israel has committed more than 50 massacres since 1948 until today.” The disgusting charge was clearly intended to simultaneously satisfy his Palestinian Arab constituents and repulse the civilized world.

Abbas Glorifies Terrorists

After the long an rambling tirade meant to insult Israel in every manner possible, Abbas wrapped up his speech glorifying Arabs who killed Israelis, and promised that the Palestinian Authority will forever support the terrorists’ families.

For the last seven minutes of his speech, starting at 41:30, Abbas declared that no foreign body can dictate anything to the PA and they will do whatever they choose. (This comment, after demanding the UN and other countries place pressure on Israel.) He used that lead-in to say that he supports the martyrs and prisoners who are Palestinian heroes. They will get the full support of the PA, in the much criticized “pay-to-slay” program, which the world has rightly condemned as funding terror.

Abbas flipped the bird to the world and said he didn’t care.

Abbas specifically singled out Nasser Abu Hamid as a “martyr” and “a hero” several times. Hamid was convicted in 1990 by Israel of killing five people but he was released as part of the Oslo Accords. In the Second Intifada-terrorism wave, Hamid began killing again. He confessed to killing seven people in five attacks between 2000 and 2002, including the infamous lynching and desecration of the bodies of IDF Corporal Vadim Nurzhitz and Yossi Avrahami during the Ramallah Lynching in October 2000.

Abbas called this murderer a “hero” to the Palestinian people over and again.

Mahmoud Abbas demonstrated to the world his intransigence, hypocrisy, insanity, and consequently, why there is no peace with Israel. The Arab world has grown tired of him and his cause, disavowing the terrorism that he and the Iranian regime support, and are beginning to deepen their countries’ relationships with Israel.

Use by date expires

A red inked rubber stamp, with a grungy texture to simulate the effect of ink on paper. AI10 EPS is saved in a CMYK color space for optimal printing.

When use by dates expire for food and medicine, we dispose of the remaining items to avoid being either poisoned or adversely affected.

Watching and listening to the latest prattling by world leaders at the annual farce of the United Nations General Assembly gathering, it should be abundantly clear to all but the totally disconnected from reality that this organisation’s use by date has well and truly expired.

That being the case, it is imperative that the democratic members who are now a distinct minority abandon their current reluctance to challenge the morally corrupt majority and call it a day.

Who funds the continued major part of the UN’s running expenses?

We all know the answer to that question. Why should the long-suffering taxpayers of New Zealand, Australia and Israel, for example, continue to keep afloat an increasingly ineffective and corrupt body when its original worthy charter has long ago become subverted by a majority of countries for whom democratic values and respect for human rights is worth nothing?

Has the time not arrived to pull the plug before the swamp of hypocrisy and double standards fatally poisons any sort of moral standard which might still exist?

The choice is stark and clear.

Either leave and create if possible a more equitable and effective guardian of democratic values or, like the passengers on the Titanic, stay and go down with the ship. After all, that is exactly what occurred with the UN’s predecessor. The League of Nations was subverted by the same type of abusers and terror-promoting regimes and in the face of appeasement by democratic members and a refusal to challenge and confront them, the body established to safeguard peace became fatally impotent. As a consequence, the League became an irrelevance where terrorist States dominated, others pontificated and the world hurtled headlong into the Shoah.

The League died, taking all its members with it. Unless today’s nations screw up their collective courage and actually act, they will likewise be responsible for the UN’s demise.

One does not need to be any sort of genius or political whizz kid to see which way the wind is blowing. Apart from politicians who spout hot air and are mesmerised by their own infallible rhetoric and those of the public who have been successfully brainwashed by a biased media, the spectacle on display at the UN General Assembly should prove that the UN and some of its associated bodies are living on borrowed time.

It is only necessary to witness the pathetic performances at the recent General Assembly to realise that rock bottom has been reached.

Two of the permanent Security Council members who wield veto powers, China and Russia, successfully thwart any and every attempt to take meaningful action against rogue nations like North Korea and Iran. Needless to say the immunity they have to flout the most basic conventions and rules of the UN makes a mockery of the charter they are theoretically pledged to uphold.

One of the fatal flaws of the deceased League was its impotence in protecting the sovereignty of small countries and preventing the bullies of the day from trampling the freedom and human rights of their neighbours. The same pitiful performance is being repeated today, and, as in the past, threats to wipe out those deemed expendable are now made. In the absence of credible consequences and with weak democratic leadership the stage is well and truly set for the criminals to take over the UN. Actually, they have already subverted it.

We know that the UN has already succumbed because one of the surest signs of this moral collapse is the fact that a scapegoat must be found to divert attention away from the real crimes.

What better scapegoat can be conjured up than the Jewish State?

When all else fails, and it is deemed necessary to unite around a common enemy, especially at times others are breaking every rule and abusing life, liberty and freedom, it is always a sure bet to pick on Israel. We have seen how well this works with the UN Human Rights Council and other associated bodies.

Just when you think that the UN cannot sink any lower, the usual suspects prove otherwise. This current session of the General Assembly is a classic case in point.

China suppresses religious and national freedoms, threatens Taiwan and erases Tibetan sovereignty. North Korea threatens its neighbours and blackmails with nuclear impunity. Afghanistan sends its female citizens back to the dark ages. Russia invades and annexes while a repeat of Communist-era suppression looms. Iran thumbs its nose at the UN as it races towards nuclear blackmail capabilities and murders women for not dressing “modestly” enough. To compound the total morass swirling in the immoral swamp of the UN, the President of Iran, who questions whether the Shoah actually occurred, is feted as an honoured member. These are just a few of the most blatant examples which marked this year’s annual farce.

The top prizes for “chutzpah” however, must undoubtedly be awarded to the Hashemite Monarch and the Palestinian Arab President for life. The former revels in his self-glorifying role as “defender” of Islamic and Christian sites in Jerusalem, and the latter basks in the international beneficence bestowed on him while he simultaneously issues venomous lies.

Abdullah of Jordan used his speech to once again vilify Israel accusing it of “putting Christians under fire in Jerusalem and undermining the status quo.” This pompous performance of unsubstantiated lies garnered no declarations of outrage from the assembled delegates and like the litany of libels which traipsed forth from other masqueraders of democratic freedoms, were listened to with nary a murmur of dissent.

The other star performer was, of course, Abbas from the PA. Having dazzled in Germany with his “fifty holocausts” accusations against Israel, he was bound to put on a repeat performance in New York. Obviously, his speech writers made sure this time that holocaust was replaced by massacres but apart from that the script was almost the same and pre-ordained. With no doubt, a majority of the General Assembly already prepared to crown him as the anointed saviour of a fake Palestine, he could be assured of a rapturous audience ready and willing to embrace every libel and lie which dripped from his mouth. All the usual and familiar crimes the Jewish State is accused of were enumerated and once again, apart from Israel, there were no condemnations of any consequence forthcoming from the rest of the assembled delegates.

His subsequent New Year greetings to Israel’s President and PM dripped with insincerity and would fool only the most gullible, of which unfortunately, there are still far too many.

None of this is surprising to any normal observer of what passes for international hot air gatherings these days.

One has, however, to query whether going along with this farce is still worthwhile.

How long can democratic nations continue to prop up an increasingly corrupt, ineffective and dysfunctional organisation?

When the use-by date has expired, it’s time to dispose of the tainted goods.

The sooner, the better.

David Cicilline, Jewish progressive, is new chair of House Middle East subcommittee

Democrats on the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee voted to name as chairman of its influential Middle East subcommittee Rep. David Cicilline, a Jewish Rhode Islander who is a member of the party’s Progressive Caucus.

Cicilline bested Brad Schneider, a moderate Jewish Illinois Democrat, in an 18-6 vote.

Cicilline and Schneider are both close to the mainstream pro-Israel community and are both endorsed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s affiliated political action committee, but establishment pro-Israel insiders had favored Schneider and lobbied for him because his ties are closer. Schneider held lay leader positions at AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, and Chicago-area Jewish groups and has taken the lead in advancing pro-Israel legislation.

Cicilline replaces Ted Deutch, the Florida Democrat who is quitting Congress to lead the American Jewish Committee, and who, like Schneider, is close to the mainstream pro-Israel community. Cicilline plans to run again to lead Democrats on the subcommittee in December. The subcommittee shapes policy on Israel and Iran, among other issues of intense focus to the organized Jewish community.

A committee insider told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that Cicilline prevailed because of his seniority, usually the most important factor when Democrats choose congressional leaders. Cicilline was elected in 2010 and has served since; Schneider was elected in 2012 but lost in 2014 before being reelected in 2016.

Cicilline stands out in the Progressive Caucus, where he is one of eight vice chairs, for being vocally pro-Israel among a faction of House members who have grown increasingly critical of the country in recent years. In addition to being endorsed by AIPAC’s PAC, he is also endorsed by the political action committee associated with J Street, the left-leaning Jewish Middle East policy group; Schneider does not have J Street’s endorsement.

Cicilline did not mention Israel in a statement after the vote but spoke in general terms of unity. “At a time of instability around the world, including in the Middle East, I believe that it is more important than ever that we work together, as members of the committee, to do everything we can to address humanitarian crises, human rights abuses, and political upheaval throughout the region,” he said.

Justice for Amiram!, Second Amiram Zoom Call, October 2 The mitzva of “redeeming captives”

Take part in the mitzvah of “redeeming captives” before this Yom Kippur. Join us in a special Zoom meeting dedicated to helping bring about the release of Amiram Ben Uliel.

The main speaker will be Steve Rodan, who will share from his experience advice on how to get Amiram released. He has been a journalist for more than 40 years and worked for major outlets in Israel, Europe, and the United States, including the Jerusalem Post, Israel Radio, Jane’s Defence Weekly, and Defense News. In 2021, Rodan and Elly Sinclair wrote and published In Jewish Blood: The Zionist Alliance with Germany, 1933-1963, which is available on Amazon.

The Zoom call will take place on Sunday, October 2 (7 Tishrei)
10:00 AM Eastern US Time
5:00 PM Israel Time

Click on the link below to register and receive the link for the Zoom call:
Registration For Second Amiram Zoom Call

Or paste the link into your browser
https://www.honenu.org/amiram-zoom-call-registration

This is NOT a political issue!

This is NOT an issue of right or left!

This is an issue of HUMAN RIGHTS!

Help Honenu stop brutal treatment of GSS interogatees and ensure fair treatment by the Israeli government and the courts; PARTNER with us.

Jordan, Sweden seek further funding for UNRWA

  • Meeting discussed mobilizing support for UNGA vote to renew agency’s mandate
  • Jordan’s deputy PM: UNRWA’s role important for regional stability

AMMAN: Jordan and Sweden have co-chaired a ministerial meeting focused on developing policies and strategies to ensure the sustainability of financing the UN Relief and Works Agency’s programs.

Jordan’s deputy prime minister and minister of foreign affairs and expatriates, Ayman Safadi, together with Sweden’s Foreign Minister Ann Linde, chaired Thursday’s ministerial meeting to support UNRWA, with the participation of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, reported the Jordan News Agency.
UNRWA’s Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini, foreign ministers and representatives of 40 countries and international organizations attended the meeting that discussed the best sustainable means to finance the agency’s programs to enable it to provide vital services to Palestinian refugees, said a ministry statement published by Jordan News Agency.
The meeting further discussed mobilizing support for the vote in the UN General Assembly to renew UNRWA’s mandate next December.
Guterres stressed the important role of UNRWA in enhancing stability in the Middle East, calling for adequate funding for the agency. He noted that the organization still needs more than $100 million.
He said without its vital services, there would be no education for children or shelter for families.
He added that support for UNRWA is a moral responsibility, and that any disruption of its work would lead to increased frustration and provide terrorist organizations with a fertile environment for recruitment.
Safadi said the agency’s role is an important factor for stability in the region, and stressed the need to continue to implement its international mandate.
He also emphasized the importance of the international community to provide political and financial support to UNRWA so that “it can continue to provide its vital services to the refugees.”
Safadi highlighted Jordan’s continued work with Sweden and international partners to provide the support the agency needs.
He also stressed the need to work on developing policies, strategies and a predictable budget through a three-year funding scheme that would enable UNRWA to fund its program from the UN’s regular budget.
Safadi said the agency must continue to provide its services until the refugee issue is resolved in accordance with international law.
He added that this should happen in the context of a comprehensive settlement based on the two-state solution that embodies the establishment of an independent, sovereign Palestinian state with occupied Jerusalem as its capital, living side by side with Israel in peace and security.
Linde said the meeting confirmed the international community’s willingness to support UNRWA and its basic role, stressing the importance of providing sustainable and stable financial support to the agency.
Lazzarini spoke about the challenges facing the agency and its financial deficit, the plan for coming years, and efforts to provide necessary support for it.

Australia promises to double aid to UNRWA to 20 million AUD

Australia promises to double aid to UNRWA to 20 million AUD
Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong announced on Friday that her country will double its humanitarian and development assistance contribution to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) this financial year to 20 million Australian dollars.

“In recognition of the vital work UNRWA undertakes I am pleased to announce today that Australia plans to double our contribution to UNRWA this financial year, from $10 to $20 million Australian dollars,” she reported in a statement.

She said, “Australia remains a strong supporter of a two-state solution, in which Israel and a future Palestinian state coexist, in peace and security, within internationally recognised borders. Viewing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from one perspective will not achieve that goal.”

“A two-state solution can only be achieved through a negotiated outcome between the two parties. Australia encourages Israel and the Palestinians to return to direct negotiations in good faith. We would welcome any initiative that can assist in the resumption of direct peace negotiations, to arrive at a sustainable and resilient settlement.”

EU aims for Israel reboot with summit

The EU is seeking to reset its often testy relationship with Israel next week, convening a summit on Monday of senior political figures for the first time in a decade.

The meeting format, known as the EU-Israel Association Council, has essentially been dormant since 2013, when Israel canceled a gathering in protest over the EU’s stance on Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Since then, the two sides have continued to clash over similar issues.

But the 2021 exit of hardline Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opened the door for current rapprochement. His replacement, Yair Lapid, who also holds the foreign minister role, has embraced a two-state solution with Palestine — a position more in line with many EU countries’ approach, even if several countries are still expected to express disapproval of Israel’s Palestinian policies on Monday. Brussels is also eager to shore up energy supplies from Israel amid Russia’s war in Ukraine.

“There’s a big hope that the upcoming association council between the EU and Israel will bring … a new wind into our relationship,” Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavský told POLITICO last week at the United Nations General Assembly, expressing optimism that the development will be one of the key achievements of the Czechs’ six-month rotating EU presidency.

Still, getting EU consensus on one of the world’s most notoriously contentious conflicts is not going to be easy.

Countries like Ireland and Sweden have traditionally taken a more pro-Palestinian stance — Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas stopped off in Dublin for a meeting with the Irish prime minister earlier this month en route to the U.N. annual gathering. On the other end of the spectrum, Israel has strong supporters within the EU. Hungary, for example, is a staunch ally with economic and ideological bonds forged over the years between Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and Netanyahu.

Before the EU-Israel council went dark, it had served for more than a decade as a forum for officials to regularly meet and discuss these issues. Now, with the council set to be revived, member states are tinkering with an official communique that needs to satisfy the spectrum of views regarding EU-Israeli relations.

Finding common language can mean weeks of fighting over a single word while backroom deals are cut to appease the myriad interests at play. Palestinian officials are also watching closely, demanding not to be left out of a similar diplomatic engagement with Brussels.

The EU’s complicated role in the Israel-Palestine conflict has played out in numerous controversies this year alone.

This spring, the European Commission was forced to delay funding for the Palestinian Authority over the content of textbooks, which critics say included anti-Israeli incitements to violence.

The decision to block the funds was led by Hungarian EU Enlargement Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi. As POLITICO first reported, 15 countries sent a letter to the Commission in April blasting the move. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen finally announced the money would be disbursed during a visit to the Palestinian city Ramallah in July.

Further tensions with Tel Aviv emerged following an Israeli raid in July on the offices of Palestinian NGOs.

Israel had accused the groups — some of which received funds from EU countries — of being terrorist organizations. But numerous EU countries weren’t convinced.

In a joint statement at the time, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden all blasted Israel, saying it had not supplied “substantial information” to justify the raids. The bloc reiterated those “deep concerns” in August after further Israeli raids on civil society groups.

Another dynamic affecting the EU’s relationship with Israel is the Continent’s energy woes. As Europe scrambles to find alternative sources of Russian gas, furthering energy ties with Israel is one possible answer.

In a June visit to Israel, von der Leyen signed a memorandum of understanding with Israel and Egypt to boost gas exports. The EU is also Israel’s largest trade market and accounts for about a third of Israel’s total trade.

But while economic imperatives explain part of the new push for engagement with Israel, long-term observers say the outreach also reflects a new willingness to engage with Tel Aviv after Lapid came to power this summer. Lapid entered office as part of a power-sharing arrangement with Naftali Bennett, who held the job for a year prior to him.

“I think it is a genuine shift,” said Maya Sion-Tzidkiyahu, who helms the Israel-Europe Program at Mitvim Institute, an Israeli think tank. “The change of tone was made by Lapid, who shares much of the EU’s normative stance on the liberal democratic world order. It’s now much more positive than during Netanyahu’s government, even if Bennett and now Lapid government is not advancing the peace process.”

Sion-Tzidkiyahu said mutually beneficial scenarios are helping to replace “megaphone diplomacy” with closer dialogue.

“Disagreements on contentious issues such as the Palestinian or Iranian one will not disappear, but perhaps there are now better understanding for the concerns of each side,” she said.

Lipavský, the Czech foreign minister, is aware of the concerns some EU countries have about the Israeli’s government actions in the West Bank and towards Palestinians.

“We need to discuss [these concerns] openly, but I don’t think that one issue should block the debate about the others,” he said.

Officially, the EU supports the two-state solution that sees a Palestinian state living side-by-side in peace and security with Israel — a vision also shared by the United States. But making that prospect a reality seems as far away as ever.

Sven Koopmans, the EU special representative for the Middle East peace process, wrote earlier this month that all parties needed to help identify ways to solve the man-made conflict.

“The current situation is increasingly seen as a structural human rights problem, in which Israel has the upper hand,” he wrote in the Israeli outlet Haaretz. “That negatively affects how the world perceives Israel, and holds risks for the long-term. It should not be that way.”

When it comes to resuming the peace process, Sion-Tzidkiyahu is not confident.

“Under the current political circumstances in the Palestinian Authority and Israel, such development is not foreseen,” she said. “At most, the EU can push for more practical steps by Israel to improve Palestinian’s condition.”

Lapid’s “Two –State Solution” Spells Disaster for Israel

Any pro-Israel supporter with at least a smidgeon of common sense and a brief history of the Jewish State’s many useless attempts to make peace with, coddle up to, make nice to, kiss the butt of and even make suicidal gestures to the Palestinians, would cringe at Israel’s current Prime Minister Yair Lapid’s speech to last week’s session of the UN, in which he offered to accept a “Two State Solution” with the Palestinian Authority. We felt we were looking at the makings of another clueless PM, the UK’s Neville Chamberlain, who nearly sold the democratic world down the drain with his cave-in-to-Hitler deal in 1938. We hope we were wrong.

Israel started back in 1948, agreeing to live in peace with its Arab neighbors. Then they signed alongside Arab leaders, deals promising to live in peace with one another. All down the drain. Included in the wasting of ink and the cost in Jewish lives were the following agreements instantly voided by the Palestinians: The Oslo Accords, The Camp David deals, Annapolis Deal, Hebron Agreement, Wye River, Taba Talks, Road Map to Peace Deal and the Arab peace Initiative, to name just some. The 1993 Oslo Accords were even negotiated with Yasser Arafat, the murderous PLO leader, famous for the Israeli Olympic Team Munich Massacre in 1972 and the slaughter of thousands more Israelis. All these “peace” deal failures because of the religious zeal and hatred of Jews as outlined in the Koran.

And this current move by Lapid would be an extension of the suicidal lunacy of Jews who refuse to acknowledge the goals of their enemies. Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu knew with whom he was dealing when he faced the Palestinians. This is one of his comments regarding Lapid’s move: “Lapid is bringing the Palestinians back to the forefront of the world stage and putting Israel right into the Palestinian hole.” Yariv Levin, Chairman of the Likud Party said: “Lapid surrendered shamefully to the Palestinian Authority and dealt a fatal blow to Israel’s political standing. Lapid bowed down to the haters of Israel,” adding that “Lapid has undone years of political achievements pushed by Netanyahu to keep Israel safe.

Although the world wants a two-state solution to create an independent Palestine, the reality is that there are insurmountable problems within the Palestinian community that would never be resolved. Firstly, there is an ongoing hatred and perpetual violence between two Arab factions, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, that no one has mentioned. Hamas controls Gaza. How would they split their governments and when would they ever make peace? Would there end up being a “Three State Solution?” And what international authority would oversee the eventual militarization of the independent nation of Palestine?

They would be a sitting member of the Israel hating, United Nation’s General Assembly and wold surely be funded by and supported militarily by the likes of Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Korea and presumably China. The Palestinian state would be nose-to-nose against Israel as we are to Mexico. And look how our border secures us from millions of  illegals and tons of death dealing narcotics flowing into our nation.

Lapid, in his UN oratorical disaster, cracked sort of a joke by stating that Israel has, “Only one condition: That a future Palestinian state will be a peaceful one. That it will not become another terror base from which to threaten the well-being and the very existence of Israel.” “Hey, no problem!” would be the response of Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority, who just a day after Lapid kissed the terrorist leader’s tuchis with a plea to give his rabble an independent nation, told the UN assembly that “Israel is not a reliable peace partner.” Coming from Arafat’s number two man who promised to “have Jewish blood run through the streets of Jerusalem,” and the planner of the Munich Olympic slaughter, that says a lot. Get ready for disaster if Lapid gets his way.

China in the Middle East

From S.R.

Israel’s academic cooperation with China has become the focus of U.S. attention. Washington is convinced that Beijing has used such cooperation to buy or steal Israeli technology. So far, Israel has not instituted guidelines to control or restrict academic cooperation with a country regarded as a strategic rival of the West. Stay tuned.

He said. She said.

“For national security officials in Jerusalem, it will be crucial they gain the cooperation of the nation’s top researchers and scientists…”

Focus

 

Photos | Li Ka Shing Foundation

In 2013, Li Ka Shing gave Israel’s Technion $130 million to set up a research center in China.

U.S. moves to China-U.S. Academic Ties

The United States has managed to stop Israeli collaboration with China in defense, security, technology and infrastructure. Now, it is moving to end or severely restrict Israeli cooperation with Chinese universities.

Washington has been lobbying Jerusalem to discourage Israeli universities from working with their Chinese counterparts. The administration of President Joe Biden has pressured Israel to impose restrictions on Israeli schools and research centers to ensure that Beijing cannot access sensitive information.

“If Israel wants to solidify its relationship with the U.S. while limiting the gateways China could conceivably use to access or acquire the country’s technology and innovation in certain dual-use domains, it must also ensure that its research, intellectual property [IP], and expert knowledge in these areas is sufficiently protected,” a report said.

On Sept. 20, Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, regarded as close to Washington, issued a report that reflected the latest U.S. concerns regarding Israeli relations with Beijing. Authored by British researcher Casey Babb, the report, titled “Proceed with Caution: Israeli Research Collaboration with China,” listed the major Israeli institutions that received hundreds of millions of dollars from their Chinese counterparts.

Nearly every major Israeli university has signed an agreement with Beijing. The first was in 2013 when Israel’s leading technology research center, the Technion, received a $130 million grant from the Li Ka Shing Foundation to establish a research center linked to Shantou University, in Guangdong Province. A year later, Tel Aviv University worked with Tsinghua University to invest $300 million in a research center in China that covered such areas as biotech and solar energy.

In 2016, China and Israel signed seven agreements for cooperation with Chinese universities, which included joint institutes and student exchanges. That led to additional cooperation, including with Haifa University, designed to construct artificial intelligence hubs in Israel and China. In 2019, the two countries opened a center in China based on scientific and technological cooperation and overseen by the Chinese Communist Party.

“Despite these and other examples of China-Israel partnerships in fields with potential dual-use capability, or in fields that could benefit China’s pursuit of civil-military fusion, little is publicly available on whether Israel has faced any substantial research loss at the hands of the CCP,” Babb, a fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, said. “Certainly, this could be a case of ‘dogs that don’t bark,’ but China’s track record around the world suggests otherwise.”

Washington has been concerned over Chinese-Israeli academic cooperation. Amid Chinese protests, U.S. pressure has whittled away at Israeli links with Beijing in most fields, including infrastructure, desalination and 5G. In July 2022, Israel and the United States announced what was deemed a new strategic technology dialogue that focused on Beijing. The Americans have claimed that China was seeking to buy or steal Israeli technology.

U.S. authorities have tracked the involvement of American academics with Beijing. A former Harvard University professor was convicted for concealing his affiliation with a Chinese university.

Beijing has not limited its efforts to Israel or the United States. China was said to have sent hundreds of scientists to NATO members. In response, several of these country have established guidelines on dealing with China.

In contrast, Israel, deemed a technology and innovation leader, has not openly restricted its universities. Babb urged that the Jewish state adopt the guidelines of such Western allies as Britain, Canada and the United States, including screening foreign students.

“For national security officials in Jerusalem, it will be crucial they gain the cooperation of the nation’s top researchers and scientists – even those that may approach the topic with skepticism and unease,” the report said. “If Israeli academics, researchers, and scientists are indeed losing their IP, expertise, and assets to Chinese spies, not only will the country’s innovation base suffer, so too will Israel’s economic competitiveness, along with its relations with key allies and partners — notably the U.S.”

Ticker Tape

…China has intensified diplomacy in the Middle East. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi issued four proposals for stability in the region as part of the Global Security Initiative. In a briefing on Sept. 21, Wang said his country was ready to a play a leading role with Middle East partners, including developing a regional security dialogue. At the opening ceremony of the second Middle East Security Forum, he said China cited the need for what it termed common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security.

…China and Turkey have reaffirmed their strategic partnership at their latest summit. The presidents of the two countries pledged to expand their relations, including energy, security and the Belt and Road Initiative. On Sept. 16, Xi Jinping and Recep Erdogan also agreed to increase trade and investment as well as coordinate Turkey’s Middle Corridor with BRI.

…China has sought to develop ties with Somalia. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi expressed support for the new government in Somalia and the Arab country’s sovereignty. In a meeting with Somali Foreign Minister Abshir Omar Huruse on Sept. 21, Wang said Somalia marked an important element in Beijing’s policy in Africa. The foreign minister said his country will continue support to Somalia but did not elaborate.

…China is interested in expanding non-energy investments in the United Arab Emirates. Chinese diplomats have been inspecting UAE companies for their suitability. On Sept. 13, China’s ambassador to the UAE, Zhang Yiming, toured Emirates Global Aluminium, the largest non-energy industrial concern in the emirates. EGA, with mines in Guinea, has been a supplier of bauxite, the main source of aluminum, for China. In 2021, EGA, engaged with China for 25 years, earned $16.6 million in trade with 55 Chinese firms.

…A Syrian doctoral student has been honored by the Chinese Foreign Ministry. The ministry published an article about Zine El Abidine Walid Ali, one of many Syrian students in China. The article, viewed more than 90 million times in China alone, talked of El Abidine’s volunteer activities during the Covid-19 pandemic. Beijing and Damascus have improved relations in a range of areas over the last year, particularly in reconstruction of Syria.

NZ Announces Funding For Glorification Of Terror

New Zealand’s Foreign Minister, Hon Minister Mahuta, has moved NZ further from its 5 eyes allies by rewarding incitement to terror via her announcement on Twitter that New Zealand will provide UNWRA with“ $3 million over 3 years” and that “Aotearoa New Zealand is pleased to be a longstanding supporter of the Agency’s work.”

UNRWA has, for decades, been found to use school textbooks replete with racism and glorification of terror. The funding decision distances New Zealand further from the United States, with whom we are meant to be lobbying for a free trade agreement. Meanwhile, the EU, Australia and other countries have condemned the racism and incitement within UNRWA schools.

The NZ UNWRA announcement comes just days after the United States House of Foreign Affairs Committee unanimously supported the Peace and Tolerance in Palestinian Education Act, which draws attention to the glorification of terror and hate taught in UNRWA schools.

The New Zealand announcement also comes only weeks after the EU Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee repeatedly challenged UNRWA chief Lazzarini on continued teaching of hate, violence and antisemitism. Members criticised UNRWA over what they called “truly horrific” new self-produced hate materials.

While other democratic countries have spoken out and reduced funding – Australia halved their contribution in 2020, the UK cut funding by a similar proportion, and The United Arab Emirates sharply reduced their funding in early 2021 – New Zealand stands out by not even acknowledging the issues.

The timing of the Tweet is also curious, given that the Minister had made the decision by the end of last year, according to documents released under the Official Information Act.

Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, is due to speak at the UN soon and to co-convene the Christchurch Call to Action Leaders’ Summit. The Christchurch Call was founded to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online and is spearheaded by MFAT.

That MFAT supports funding the glorification of terror in schools, while world leaders convene to combat terror online, seems hypocritical. A government that purports to stand against hate should not be so proud to fund violent extremist content overseas.

The Israel Institute of New Zealand has shown that Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) officials failed to brief previous Foreign Ministers, which could explain their lack of action to prevent Kiwi taxpayer dollars from inciting violence. However, due to pressure from IINZ and the NZ Human Rights Commission, Minister Mahuta was briefed on the issues that MFAT claims to take “extremely seriously”.

An MFAT briefing to Minister Mahuta in December 2021 recognises that “concerns have been raised in Aotearoa New Zealand and internationally that education textbooks produced by the Palestinian Authority (PA) Ministry of Education contain material that may foster hatred, violence, and antisemitism among Palestinian children”. The briefing also referenced the EU-funded Georg Eckert Institute report that confirmed problematic content, which MFAT officials said “did not come as a surprise”.

Chief Human Rights Commissioner, Paul Hunt, has said “NZ’s international human rights obligations do not stop where its territorial sea ends… If NZ taxpayer funds are being used to publish antisemitic textbooks, this would place NZ in breach of its international human rights obligations.”

In July 2022, Commissioner Hunt wrote to Jonathan Kings, Deputy Secretary of Pacific and Development Group at MFAT, expressing concern about the antisemitism that MFAT funds and asking “know what arrangements are in place to ensure that Aotearoa New Zealand’s national and international human rights commitments are considered when MFAT is devising its development and aid initiatives.”

MFAT has not yet responded at the time of this article (19 Sept 2022).